Forum Topics

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

To save people the agony of having to deal with a future nightmare  with Look After My Bills and Utility Point please read their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.                                  This is an email I received from Trustpilot this week.                                                People are reading your review!Hi Neil Milkins,You recently wrote a review on Trustpilot and it looks like people find it helpful.117 people have already read your review.                                                                                                       LOOK AFTER MY BILLS SHAMBLES.It is now 12 weeks since Look After My Bills without my knowledge or permission changed my energy provider from S.S.E. to Utility Point. Jacqueline Loughman promised me 9 weeks ago that they would resolve the matter within 14 days. A week ago their senior complaints manager Daniel promised me he would phone me on (29-12-20) and have the matter resolved. No phone call and no answer to my emails to him. In the meantime I am going to have a sky high electric and gas bill when this matter is resolved. It is near impossible to get a reply from them once you have emailed and phoned them and it is totally impossible to phone Utility Point as ALL their phone lines have been cut off. I have been on the phone and emailing 19 hours in total trying to sort this mess out. Anyone thinking of going with Look After My Bills or Utility Point please check their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.

Neil Milkins ● 1577d14 Comments ● 1566d

Renaming Havelock Road Council corruption

Renaming Havelock Road may be a trivial issue. The way it was achieved is an illustration of how Ealing Council at its highest level goes about its business: dishonestly. The decision to rename the road Havelock Road was made by “two pillars of the community”, Julian Bell, Council Leader, and Paul Najserak, CEO.   Bell suggested the idea (10.6.20.)  Why?  He doesn’t live on the road or in Southall.   ANSWER:  he depends on Southall councillors for support and is in the pay of the local MP.    Self-interest. On 14.7.20 the matter appeared on the agenda of the Cabinet, never having been discussed by them before.  The Cabinet had it all done and dusted there and then.   They decided a council officer could make the decision. Democracy?  No. Decisions should be made by our elected representatives, not by council employees.  Paul Najserak made the decision.  Between Bell making the suggestion and Najserak making the decision what occurred appears to be a conspiracy to subvert due process so that Southall could be given what Southall wanted -  FREE.FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST I have been trying to get straight answers about what occurred for weeks.  I am still trying. A Freedom of information Request is needed to secure the minutes of meetings and internal memoranda. I believe someone has already made one.  If that person is reading this, would they please let us know the result - if there was one.Meanwhile: LETTER SENT TO BELL “Dear Julian Bell, Why did the Cabinet deal with renaming Havelock Road rather than leaving it to a resident to make an application?   There was no reason a resident could not do so and it is the routine way for such applications to happen?  Your sincerely, Andrew Farmer”

Andrew Farmer ● 1602d10 Comments ● 1569d

Ealing Planning! Object extension of further storey in the modern house in quiet Oxford Road

IMPORTANT!Dear Neighbours, it's Yulia from the Grove.As you may know, the modern house on 69 Oxford Rd has submitted a planning application to Ealing Council to build a further storey on top of their existing building, despite the original planning application being for a single storey onlyThe application is very professional and has gone through pre-consultation with the Council. So it will be hard to stop. The Plannint Case Officer (Smruti Patel) has confirmed that the number of objections will make a big difference to the case for blocking planning permission. So far only 10 objections have been received - we ideally need 50-60Possible grounds for objection:- overdevelopment - out of character with surrounding conservation area - potential for reduced parking- reduced light for gardens close to the property- sets a precedent for other modern developments in the conservation arePLEASE SUBMIT AN OBJECTION - it only takes 2 mins to write 1-2 lines in your own words referring to the grounds of objection abovehttps://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=QHS9ZZJMFX500The link above is where you submit your objection. You need to fill in your personal details. Select 'neighbour' for 'commenter type', select 'object' for 'stance' and then tick the following boxes under 'reason for comment': close to adjoining properties // development too high // inadequate parking provision

Yulia Chaplina ● 1609d6 Comments ● 1593d

A moste interestinge article with which I (of course!) heartily agree:-

However, we do live, currently, and despite the concerted efforts of many, in a free speaking society, and this is a Forum, so all opinions and comments are welcome to debate!https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9057393/CALVIN-ROBINSON-Good-riddance-bunkum-unconscious-race-bias-classes.htmlDaily Mail / Calvin RobinsonPUBLISHED: 23:19, 15 December 2020 | UPDATED: 23:21, 15 December 2020As diversity lessons for the civil service are scrapped, it's good riddance to the bunkum of 'unconscious race-bias' classes.Despite huge demographic changes in recent decades, our political system has not been scarred by extremism, nor has our society been gripped by racial discord.Britain is a remarkably tolerant country with an impressive record on integration.Despite huge demographic changes in recent decades, our political system has not been scarred by extremism, nor has our society been gripped by racial discord.Our national spirit of openness is precisely why so many migrants wish to settle here.It is therefore a bitter paradox that this success story is being undermined by a small minority who pose as the champions of anti-racism but who only promote friction as they seek to paint Britain as a land wracked by bigotry.The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’.TwistedBut today’s self-styled ‘anti-racists’ have turned that ideal on its head, holding that we should all be defined by our ethnicity. In their twisted narrative, colour blindness is not a virtue but a vice.This divisive outlook is reflected in the fashion for ‘unconscious bias training’, now common in British workplaces, especially in the public sector.Such training — which can range from lectures to online tests — aims to root out any hidden prejudices that may inadvertently influence staff behaviour or decisions.That may sound like politically correct nonsense. But, in recent years, even our political class has succumbed to it.Since 2014, when completing four ‘modules’ in diversity and inclusion training became a requirement for all Whitehall staff, 170,000 civil servants have undergone it.And in the summer, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, Sir Keir Starmer decided all Labour Party employees should undergo such instruction.But now a welcome stand has been made by the Government against this fad.Yesterday, the Cabinet Office announced that ‘unconscious- bias training’ will be scrapped for the civil service, after an internal review found the courses did nothing for equality and, in some cases, were even counter-productive as they fuelled resentment.In the present institutionalised fervour about race, the decision is a bold one.But it is absolutely correct. For the review is only the latest in a string of reports that confirm that bias training is, put simply, a load of bunkum.In 2018, the Equality and Human Rights Commission found the evidence for the ‘ability [of unconscious bias training] to change behaviour is limited’.A year later, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development declared that the courses in bias ‘had no sustained impact on behaviour’.This is hardly surprising given that the whole method is profoundly flawed and riddled with contradictions.It supposedly celebrates diversity, but demands rigid conformity with its dogma. Its ostensible purpose is to build harmony, but its bullying, hectoring tone causes hostility and defensiveness.Stereotypes are denounced under the doctrine, yet sweeping generalisations are made about white people. It preaches responsibility for personal actions, yet infantilises and patronises users.This was highlighted by a recent such course in Parliament, where MPs were lectured by a diversity consultant using a glove puppet.More importantly, it has no intellectual basis of any substance.Calvin Robinson: The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’ +3Calvin Robinson: The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’First developed in the 1990s from the Implicit Association Test, a tool for ‘psychological diagnosis’ developed by American social psychologists, it is a hopelessly unreliable pseudo-science, like astrology or phrenology (the belief that character can be assessed from the shape of the head).That lack of credibility stems from the fact that its primary purpose is not scientific at all, but political: namely, to be used by cultural warriors to ensure that everyone conforms to their world view.Queen Elizabeth I famously declared that she had ‘no desire to make windows into men’s souls’. For her, as long as her subjects obeyed the law, she did not care what they thought privately.That has been the British tradition for centuries.But bias trainers have a very different approach.Like the Thought Police of George Orwell’s novel 1984, they want to control minds by delving into the unconscious, where they would like to eradicate unpalatable ideas and impose compliance.And as with any attempt to change people’s thinking, the premise behind unconscious-bias training only operates in one direction, where white people are the eternal oppressors and ethnic minorities the permanent victims.It is inconceivable that on any course a black or Asian client would be berated by a trainer for showing prejudice against a white colleague.This one-sided attitude also gives rise to the racially charged concept of ‘white privilege’, which is not only nasty but absurd.A white supermarket shelf stacker has far less wealth and power than a successful black barrister or an Asian medical consultant.GuiltBut the bias trainers set a trap for anyone who dares to challenge them.They refer to ‘white fragility’ to describe any negative reaction to any accusations of racial prejudice.Surprise, surprise — their white clients can never win.If they submit, they are admitting to their guilt as unconscious racists. If they refuse, they are attacked for being in denial, too ‘fragile’ to handle the truth.Either way, the bias trainers — who charge a minimum of £300-an-hour for the opportunity to hector their customers — end up laughing all the way to the bank.One consultancy I came across yesterday charges a £1,750 fee for a day’s course in ‘unconscious bias and cross-cultural training’. But this mix of indoctrination and cash-grabbing has to end.Pictured: Femi Otitoju with ‘UB’ puppet, that is said to be used in the 'unconscious bias' training given to MPs in a course designed by Challenge Consultancy +3Pictured: Femi Otitoju with ‘UB’ puppet, that is said to be used in the 'unconscious bias' training given to MPs in a course designed by Challenge ConsultancyThat is why the Government’s decision yesterday was so welcome and could mark a turning point in the fight back against the spread of the pernicious woke agenda.The Tories have been in power for ten successive years and, after the last election triumph, enjoy an 80-seat majority in the Commons.Yet they have been astonishingly timid about defending liberalism and British values against the race-obsessed minority who have held sway for far too long.While, of course, there remain inequalities that need addressing, this cause has come to predominate in civic life.Museums are browbeaten into removing statues, schools into ‘decolonising’ their lessons.The National Trust, which has entirely succumbed to the PC onslaught, recently drew up a list of shame, featuring historic properties that have links to British imperialism or the slave trade.LaughableSome of the grievances would be laughable were they not so offensive.Only last month, the late Poet Laureate Ted Hughes was denounced because one of his distant ancestors had a connection to slavery.Meanwhile, without any sense of irony at all, Prince Harry, a self-appointed high priest of the diversity cult, has the nerve to lecture us about white privilege.Even the much-cherished British pastime of horticulture is in the dock, with BBC Countryfile presenter James Wong declaring last week that ‘UK gardening culture has racism baked into its DNA’.Welcome to the mad world of contemporary ‘anti-racism’, where even pruning the roses may be a thought crime.The Government’s decision is a much-needed blow for sanity against such lunacy.Britain is a great country with so much that people of all races can celebrate.We cannot allow its appeal to be destroyed by fanatics bent on whipping up racial disunity for their own self-serving ends.Calvin Robinson is a former teacher and now governor at a London state school.

Rosco White ● 1594d0 Comments ● 1594d

No 15 Blakesley Avenue W5 - Planning enforcement

No 15 Blakesley Avenue has appealed to the Sec of State against the enforcement notice issued by Ealing Council. This is the property that has breached planning regs and built a single storey rear extension and an unauthorised enlargement of a basement extension. They are continuing to build and no doubt the plan is to use the property as self contained flats without permission. This is similar to no 59 Eaton Rise where the application was to convert a family home into 7 self contained flats. Don't let this one set the precedent for the others and whilst it may not be happening on your doorstep today, large family homes are being lost more and more to scrupulous property developers who think they have found a way to make money by overdeveloping into these spaces, with or without permission.If you can help preserve our conservation area please forward to neighbours and friends in the Ealing area and if they wish to comment on the appeal, please can you do so online at https://www.gov.uk/appeal-enforcement-notice/comment-on-an-appeal or you can email your comments to teame1@planninginspectorate.gov.uk or a letter can be sent to The Planning Inspectorate, Room 3/23A, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Bristol BS1 6PN. The appeal ref to quote is APP/A5270/C/20/3258722. LAST DATE TO RESPOND 5 JANUARY 2021.An application for planning has just been made by no 13 Blakesley Avenue (neighbours of the above and we suspect related parties) to convert a same double fronted home into 8 self contained flats. Again if you can please ask friends and family, neighbours to lodge their comments at https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/PLAN/204232FULThanks for all your help neighbours! Please forward and share on all social media sites.

Rukhi Sohi ● 1608d2 Comments ● 1608d

How other boroughs do it better

The Future of the Great British Town Hall – everywhere but Ealing “There is no alternative but to talk to the representatives of the community who are actively going to participate in this [civic building] long after we as architectural practitioners have moved on to other things. The term I use? ‘Ruthlessly inclusive’” – Ivan Harbour, Senior Partner, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners Town Halls are architectural icons from an era of optimism and utopia, which aimed to give power back to local communities. Whilst the buildings still carry those founding principles, there is a perception that they have lost their connection to the community and many have fallen into disrepair.Local Authorities, but not Ealing, are increasingly finding inventive ways to reverse this decline by re-imagining town halls, re-establishing them as public assets, and often successfully placing them at the centre of local regeneration and industrial growth strategies.Ealing council have closed the local town halls in the borough leaving only Ealing. Ealing borough residents were not consulted about the future of the old Town Tall and had only a brief chance to view some boards in the Broadway Centre, the done deal for Perceval House. Unlike the boroughs in this webinar our Illustrious Leader and his cabal of nodding donkeys have no vision.  Senior council officers share responsibility, they are employed to adviseThis webinar shows what can be done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdMYHiW-Ev4&feature=emb_logo

Libby Kemp ● 1619d2 Comments ● 1614d

Something Fishy About The Brexit Negotiations

The PM is disappearing off into the attic room in 10 Downing Street just as the Brexit policy he has championed is reaching a crisis point. He is now insisting on a rigorous interpretation of the rules having been exposed to Covid-19 because he had previously been totally unbothered about adhering to them. Whether this is because he wanted sometime away from Princess Nut Nuts or was hoping to catch up with The Crown and Breaking Bad we won't find out until he publishes his memoirs but whatever the reason his competence has once again been proven sorely wanting. Bad as the pandemic is, there is good reason to believe that a no deal Brexit would have more dire consequences for this country in the longer term. By Spring we hopefully will have a vaccine but the deleterious consequences of having no proper trading agreement with our neighbours will last for decades. The two things that seem to be driving us to no deal are the UK's government insistence on state aid and the issue of fishing. I can't begin to understand why a Conservative government would deem state aid to be so important — what on earth would Mrs Thatcher think? It was her driving forward the single market that significantly reduced government support across Europe for ailing industries and made the EU much more internationally competitive. I originally thought fishing was more straightforward. Although it is a tiny industry, fair enough that this country should be able to control its own waters. However, I now learn that most fishermen or fisherpeople as we now apparently must call them, don't want to leave the EU. This is because it has started to become clear that although British trawlers will be able to catch more fish, there will be nobody to buy it. We eat a relatively small proportion of the fish caught in domestic waters and the EU bought a large amount. These exports would now be subject to tariffs. Worse still more people are employed in processing fish than there are catching them and when a non-British ship currently brings in a haul from British waters it will go to our fish processing plants which are the largest in Europe. These ships will no longer bring their catch onshore because they would then be subject to tariffs so they will be processed in facilities in the EU. Because the catch of British ships alone will not be sufficient to make up the difference, so some of the processing facilities will inevitably close leading to large scale job losses in the industry. Is there anybody who still supports Brexit who can explain to me why if, even if the only industry supposedly benefiting from all this is being harmed, why we are going down this road other than the man supposed to be at the wheel has bu**ered off just when he is needed.




Gordon Southwell ● 1623d5 Comments ● 1618d

The War for Johnson's Ear

For anyone who has had the misfortune to study Tudor court politics what is happening in Number 10 seems depressingly familiar. Weak and incapacitated leadership from the top is leading to factions vying for power. It hasn't been stated explicitly in any of the news reports I have seen on this so far but it is difficult not to conclude that the Biden election victory has set this all off. Channel 4 did some proper investigative journalism to show the extent to which former members of the very small Vote Leave team now dominate at the Cabinet Office and Number 10.  This country has already had its reputation sullied by the current government but appointing someone who is best known for dressing up as a chicken as Chief of Staff would clearly have been a step too far. Channel 4 highlighted how the current cabinet has effectively been rendered powerless by the Cummings cliques grip on power so it has been left to the only apparent adult left in the room, Carrie Symonds, to act. The only possible argument for a no deal Brexit was that it would allow a transformative deal with the US which would partially compensate for the economic damage done. Biden may have called Johnson before other European leaders but it wasn't a sign of favour but to issue a warning about the Internal Market Bill and the Good Friday Agreement. Johnson has been told that if he continues on this path he will be very much on his on and it will be no deal with the US as well as with Europe which would be an economic disaster several levels up from what would have happened if we left without a deal under Trump. Today it looks alarmingly like a hostage situation is developing in Downing Street with Cummings and David Frost threatening to resign if Johnson doesn't stick to their programme. He may be tempted to give into their demands because a u-turn now would mean he would have to go back on all the pledges he made  after being elected.  However, there is some cause for optimism because it is hard to thing of a pledge that Johnson hasn't gone back on and there are signs that even a cabinet handpicked for their loyalty to Brexit are increasingly realising the current path is the one to national ruination. That said, if Cummings isn't out by the end of today I think it will be a very bad sign.

Gordon Southwell ● 1628d2 Comments ● 1624d

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads backed up.

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Bernard Allen ● 1653d19 Comments ● 1629d

Black History Matters - Community Circle

Join us on Sunday 18th October at Ravenor Park at 10.30am as we hold a Safe Space to Share. This is a family-friendly Community Circle with a welcoming atmosphere and music. Meet your neighbours, exchange ideas and create social change. Creating a Open Community in Ealing to overcome racism together.Please Remember Distancing Guidelines.Supported By BLMWestLondonhttp://www.blmwestlondon.co.uk/https://www.instagram.com/blmwestlondon/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuS23lZplfKqRZtXHMVTwEw/about?view_as=subscriberhttps://mobile.twitter.com/blmwestlondonInviting all individuals interested in overcoming racism locally to this safe space. We would love to hear from people who would love to offer their skills to the community. Come along, lets talk and introduce our beautiful selves to each other.Rough Schedule:10 am - 10.30 am : Meet and Greet - Introduction of Safe Space. @45 Ruislip Rd, Greenford UB6 9QD, Entrance to Ravenor Park from Ruislip Road.10.30 am : Opening Drumming, Chanting and Clapping Circle10.35 am: Open Mic - History10.55 am: Open Mic - Poetry11.30 am: Taking the Knee followed by Poetry and Yoga11.45 am: Open Mic - Black Business Shout Out12.15 pm: Open Mic - Community Circle12.45 pm: Well Being and Grounding12.55 pm Music Jam ( Bring your Instruments, Pots, Pans and wooden Sticks)1.15pm Anyone who would like to come and support All Black Lives UK March in the Central London. Marble Arch to Parliament Square 2pm-6pm Feel free to come with your spirit and energy to hear the speeches and raise the vibrations with your voices.https://www.instagram.com/allblacklivesuk/Aim-Bring the community together in a safe and healing space.Learn and share our History, Culture and Experiences with each other.Remembering the Traumas of the past and current. Healing with our SharingEmpower the Voices of Ealing and Wider Area. Coming up with local projects and ideas.A Litterpick if any rubbish is made of the area to ensure a clean and peaceful community action. Please bring a bag to put rubbish in.Let us know if you want to Help: Organise, Promote(social media), want help setting up Community Building like this in your local area.Looking for individuals connected to:Black BusinessesTherapistsYoga Instructors - Guided meditationsMusiciansPerformersPoetsIdeas on how to make it better for everyoneContact: blmwestlondon@protonmail.comIF YOU HAVE SYMPTOMS PLEASE DO NOT ATTEND

Anil Patel ● 1654d0 Comments ● 1654d

ANOTHER BOGUS "CONSULTATION": HAVELOCK ROAD S

ANOTHER BOGUS CONSULTATION: HAVELOCK ROADHow many of you knew that the Havelock Road consultation began on August the 10th?  I learnt about it only when it appeared on Ealing Today on 28.8.20.  If I had relied on the Acton website, I would not know about it at all. Anyone who has taken part in one of these “consultations” knows they are hypocritical exercises to give an appearance of democracy to decisions already made.   We have a tick-the-box opportunity to express our opinion.  There is no possibility of dialogue in these consultations, of having one’s arguments responded to.  And who will assess the results?   Julian Bell will, along with senior council officers, who naturally will not wish to offend the great man, their boss. They will “summarise” the results, which allows them to put their spin on them.  These “summaries” are also where unique or substantial contributions can be lost to avoid having to deal with them.    As to the present matter, Bell was already in favour of changing the name the minute he received his “instructions” from Mayor Khan in early June.  Well, he would be wouldn’t he: he is kept in power by Southall votes.  The move was “welcomed” by MP Virendra Sharma, Mr Bell’s former/present (?) employer, who is evidently unaware of the custom of MPs’ keeping their nose out of local politics.  I can find no evidence of a council meeting at which the proposal was discussed and adopted.  This should have happened and information about it should have headed any proposal for consultation. This is this local government by dictat.  The proposition is put in positive terms.   It is to celebrate the birth of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism.  A new tradition?   Can someone direct me to Abraham Road, Jesus Road, or Ron Hubbard Road?   The enterprise has of course the negative purpose of getting rid of the name “Havelock” (at least on the designated stretch of the road).   It is part of a cultural replacement agenda.  No case is made for expunging “Havelock”.  It should be.We shall no doubt have to pay for the work in changing the signage, but residents of the road will not be compensated for the changes they will have to make to documentation etc.. That is unjust. The blurb gives an account of the history and ethos of Sikhism, including its treatment of women, but fails to mention a matter that brings Sikhism into the news:  honour killings.  Such events are rare in the UK and “honour killing” is not a feature of the religion’s ideology, indeed it is contrary to it.  It is a cultural not religious matter.   However, if attitudes to women are what is being discussed, it should be mentioned if only to deal with it and make the points I have just made. Sikhism is not a problem, certainly not in Ealing.  Julian Bell is our problem.  He is pursuing this matter to follow instructions  from Khan, out of self-interest (votes) and with the approval of one of his “cash points”, Sharma.  

Andrew Farmer ● 1698d3 Comments ● 1694d

Gunnserbury Park Bowling Club

Some readers may have read the very sad and alarming news that the bowling green at Gunnersbury Park is to be "repurposed" as a putting green (also known as a crazy golf course).Much has changed since the incorporation of the Community Interest Company (CIC) in 2015. In that year, as part of a leisure strategy for the Park, it was stated that "the location of the bowls club and its green is seen as a positive to the scheme in terms of development of the club, membership and participation. For example use of the sports hall for indoor short matt bowls and general increase in footfall to the site. The councils have met with the bowls club committee and will continue to work together in developing these proposals."There is no question that the CIC faces formidable financial challenges, greatly exacerbated by the Covid crisis and by the fire at the cafe. However other significant problems, including the one year delay in the completion of the Sports Hub, appear to be due to poor project management rather than to bad luck.The CIC is a not-for-profit community interest company set up to manage Gunnersbury Park and Museum. The CIC is managed by a board of 6 people, supported by an executive arm comprising the CEO and other salaried staff. Amongst other things a CIC is statutorily responsible for ensuring that the company is run in a way that satisfies the community interest test. In practice, this means that it may be required to give more weight to the interests of the community than to financial returns although, like any other company, it is required to remain solvent.A matter of very significant public concern is the "democratic deficit" which characterises the CIC's activities. This is manifested in a lack of transparency, accountabilty, and reluctance to engage with the community. For example, the CIC publishes no lists of meeting dates, agendas, minutes, or agreed action points.This latest announcement by the CIC presages the wanton destruction of a precious community facility which was founded in 1931 and which could still be reinstated. It is clear that the CIC is bent on the cynical engineering of a situation whereby they hope that a planning permission for a cafe/restaurant at the bowling club pavilion will be be granted in due course.Descriptions of events over recent years have been characterised by misunderstandings, blatant misinformation and, like any other sports club, some internal dissension. At the end of its life the Bowling Club had 25 members, of which 22 were active. The Club was fully aware of the need to grow its membership, of all ages. To this end, the CIC were approached and a strategy was presented to them. A 2-year plan, allowing for completion of the new Sports Hub building, then 1 year exposure to all the visitors to the Hub, and then 1 year of open days and free training and associated publicity. It was felt that as a result the membership could easily be raised to 60 or more particularly as there were positive signs of a revival in the sport.The CIC rejected the plan out of hand.The club was given notice to quit the site by 9 January 2020. The CIC had reneged on an agreed extension of the Licence to Occupy and thereby forced the departure of the bowls club.All of those involved in the CIC's decision should hang their heads in shame. Brentford Voice wishes to do all in its very limited power to rescue the situation. To that end we would welcome any comments, suggestions, and expressions of support.Please post your replies on this Forum or send an email to info@brentfordvoice.co.uk

Jim Storrar ● 1721d4 Comments ● 1718d

Left-wing indoctrination in schools?

Left-wing indoctrination in schools? The decolonising project Following an earlier thread in respect of this matter, I have submitted a list of questions to the council officer, Julie Lewis, who is responsible for the decolonising project.  As yet, it is not even clear what it comprises.  There is no official statement in respect of it.    The Black Lives Matter Movement, however, appears to be its spring-board and at the centre of its interest.  One of my questions was which manifestation of the movement Ealing Council was in step with.  The movement has recently taken a sinister “black-shirt”, paramilitary-style turn.  We shall have to be on the look-out for Julian Bell goose-stepping down the Uxbridge Road, not likely, but, if the price was right -----Here are the questions.   1. THE DECOLONISING PROJECTI learned about it only from an item on the Ealing Today website.  I tried to find an official statement about the project but failed to locate one.Does Ealing Council have an official statement about the project?  [Q1]If so, may I have a copy and will you publish it?  [Q2]2. THE EALING LEARNING PARTNERSHIPThis is an association of Council officers and head teachers. You are its director.   I hoped I might find further information here but I am denied access because “full access is only available to registered users” and user accounts are only available for Ealing maintained schools and academies staff and Ealing LA staff. Why are they not available to the people who are funding it? [Q3]Do you consider it appropriate for the Council or ELP to operate in this covert manner in respect of children’s education, avoiding scrutiny by the public?   [Q4]Will you give me access to all the information about this organisation that I am presently denied?   [Q5]If not, what is your reason for refusing?  There is no issue of confidentiality involved. [Q6]3. THOSE INVOLVED IN THE DECOLONISING PROJECTThis initiative was arranged “in a meeting between education union representatives and Ealing Council on Tuesday, June 30” and you “welcomed the steps from the unions”.    “A union rep at Twyford High School” was also involved.Will you please supply a list of the other organisations and pressure groups whom you have consulted?  [Q7] This is to reassure us that this is not merely a one-sided, left-wing inspired endeavour but one that takes into account a spectrum of political opinion in respect of matters educational, the present issue in particular.Why did you not consult the people of Ealing?  What is taught in our schools, how it is taught and who influences what is taught is a matter of concern to all the people of Ealing. [Q8]Are you a member of a union?  Which?  One would not normally ask this question, but, in the circumstances, it is necessary in order to establish that you are behaving with the impartiality required of you as a public servant and by the council’s code for employees.   [Q9]4. THE “PROBLEM”You allude to government data in which “black Caribbean students’ attainment was below the average for England in all subjects and at all key stages.”   This was your reason for selecting this issue to act upon.There is also ample evidence that white working-class boys are underachieving.   The problem was discussed in Parliament on 12.3.20.  Statistics were reeled off and the opening speaker concluded by saying: I am concerned that this issue has been brushed under the carpet … by modern society, which refuses to see the plight of young white males, even those from disadvantaged backgrounds.Why are you concerned with one racial group and not another?   The two matters could surely be pursued in parallel, instructively so. There is no evidence of any similar endeavour in respect of white working-class boys. Your present approach, if not racist, is manifestly RACIALLY-DISCRIMINATORY.   What is your explanation?   The reason you give for pursuing the one matter applies equally to the other. [Q10]5. THE PROBLEM LOCALLYYou are concerned that black Caribbean students’ attainment is below the average in England.  What evidence do you have that this is the case in Ealing? [Q11]Which schools in Ealing are operating the curriculum to the disadvantage of black Caribbean pupils so that it is necessary to “decolonise” the curriculum in their case?   Please name them.  [Q12]If you have no such evidence, why burden schools with this issue at a time that is difficult enough for them as they prepare to reopen?  [Q13]Why are you acting upon generalised data and mere assumption?  [Q14]6.THE CURRICULUM  It is difficult to understand how the manner in which mathematics is taught at GCSE or A level can disadvantage black Caribbean-heritage pupils as, while socio-economic factors may affect their diligence, success in the subject essentially depends upon a capacity for abstract reasoning.  How does one decolonise a quadratic equation?  With other subjects, though not all, it might make more sense.Please supply a list of subjects with an explanation of what “decolonise” MEANS in the context of each. [Q15]The union representative, has some suggestions. LiteratureHe writes: “The English curriculum has a lot of dead white men in it, and yet whilst those suggestions are literally very good examples, there is a wealth of other authors and poets that can be studied that would be just as good, just as relevant, and perhaps more engaging for our population.”Which, in your opinion are the “dead white men”  - and let us not forget the ladies - whose works are no longer considered relevant?  Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Milton, Dickens, Austin, the Brontes?   And, more importantly, the names, please, of the “authors and poets who are just as good”.  [Q16]GeographyHe refers to progress being made by a rep who set up a WhatsApp group now with more than 100 geography teachers, academics and professors looking how to make the subject anti-racist.  More information, please. In what way is geography as presently taught in Ealing schools racist?   Which schools in Ealing are guilty of this racism? [Q17]HistoryYour union man asks: “Will Ealing and ELP work with the NEU in putting together a curriculum which has been decolonised and has got anti-racism threaded through all parts of the curriculum and not just having a Black History Month?”This sounds very much like what we were promised had Labour won the last election. Even the phraseology resembles Labour’s Race and Faith manifesto. (“The history of colonialism should be ‘part and parcel of what our children learn all year round’” and "not just in Black History Month".   A Trust was to be set up to ensure “the historical injustices of colonialism, and the role of the British Empire was properly integrated into the National Curriculum, to teach powerful Black history which is also British history”.)Which schools in Ealing have been failing to teach the “dark side” of the history of the British Empire?  Please name them. [Q18]Is it the opinion of Ealing Council that the British Empire had no good effects? [Q19]Will you explain how the Ealing Council will make sure that a balanced account of the British Empire will be presented in the classroom?   The indications are that it will not be. The very terms of discussion suggest the matter is already settled. [Q20]The analysis of the content of any part of the curriculum can only be plausibly carried out by a person qualified in that subject.  Please state in respect of each part of the curriculum, each subject, the name, status and qualifications of the person who will be examining that part of the curriculum in order to decolonise it. [Q21]7. TWYFORD HIGH SCHOOLTwyford School is singled out on the local website. It is an Academy.  There is no reason Ealing Council should not have discussions with academies along with its own schools, but an academy is free within the law to determine its own curriculum.  What business is it of Ealing Council, to seek to pressure schools into going along with your decolonising agenda?   I say “pressure” because head teachers may well feel intimidated into going along with it for fear of being called racist, which is the bullying ploy of left-wing agitators. Twyford High School was not put in the spotlight by a communication from the school but by a “union rep” at the school.  The latter “revealed” that a letter has been received from 700 current and former pupils urging the school to “decolonise” the curriculum and support Black Lives Matter.  A working group is being set up at the school for September. The suspicion is that the union rep might have been behind organising the letter and be behind setting up the working group. Who is the “union rep”?  His name, please.  To whom did the rep “reveal” this?   To you or some other officer of Ealing Council?  Or to whom? [Q22]The union “rep” appears to be distracting pupils from their education at a time when concentration upon it is particularly difficult and attempting to set up a posse of left-wing BLM activists?  Irrespective of his obligations as a teacher, it is difficult to see how this activity conforms to the proper purpose of a students’ union as defined in legislation.Is it Ealing Council’s opinion that the proper purpose of a students’ union is to facilitate politically-motivated activism as against allowing it to have input into the “domestic”, day-to-day affairs of the school? [Q23}Twyford School has an excellent report from Ofsted.   It did particularly well in respect of black pupils.“A well-above-average proportion of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds, mainly Black or Black British, mixed race, Asian or Asian British, and White other than British   ---  Pupils of all backgrounds and abilities make excellent progress in tir studies and achieve well in almost all their lessons  --- The gap is also narrowing significantly between the performance of certain minority ethnic groups, such as Black African and Caribbean pupils, and their peers at Twyford. They have done well in the past compared with national averages for their heritage group, and are now catching up with national norms for all pupils …. Exclusions of Black Caribbean boys has been higher than for other groups in the past but a specific focus on these pupils’ needs, responding with an effective curriculum, has reduced the number of incidents.In the light of this, what reason is there to interfere with the curriculum in this school? [Q24]8. BLACK LIVES MATTERYour project is floated on the tide of enthusiasm for the “Black Lives Matter” movement.  Indeed, your ELP “provides information and guidance relating to Black Lives Matter and anti-racism, and presentations addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matters protests”. This was a statement made with “partners in Hackney and Brent on changing what youngsters learn in schools”.In any case, we are clearly not talking about BLM as a slogan or sentiment (about which there is no dispute) but as an organisationWhat advice have you given and are you giving in respect of presentations “addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matters protests”?  Please may I have a copy? [Q25]What guidance are you as a council officer or director of ELP giving to schools in respect of the BLM movement?  Please may I have a copy? Which “Black Lives Matter” organisation is Ealing Council supporting?  Please respond in respect of each of the following. [Q26](i) Is it the original organisation formed by three black feminist lesbians?(ii) Is it the present USA organisation with its Defund the Police agenda and at the moment devoted to the political purpose of influencing the USA election? (iii) Is it an English version?   If so, details of that, please. (iv) Is it the recent “Black Trans Lives Matter” variant?  (v) Is it the Black Lives Matter movement in its Marxist manifestation in which the black/white polarity is interpreted as the oppressed/oppressor scenario of the “long march”?  This was voiced recently in Oxford by an activist.   “Racism is based on Capitalism”, she began.  She continued, “We need a black militia.   They have pepper sprays.  We have a pepper spray.  The police is no different from the KKK.   British values do not exist.  Put you fist in the air. BLACK POWER!  Don’t let a Jewish man make you unheard.   Free Palestine!” Does Ealing Council endorse these views? If not, reject each one specifically and in turn. Failure to do so will indicate that Ealing Council is in agreement with these sentiments and aims.(vi) Is it the BLM we have seen in action, rioting in Central London and injuring members of the police force, attacking and abusing black officers, committing acts of criminal damage in Bristol, rioting again in Brixton, whose members interviewed on TV have stated that its aim is to destroy capitalism?Will you dissociate yourself unequivocally and in specific terms from the manifestations of the BLM movement I have described?   If you do not, I shall assume you approve of them and are approaching your work in a politically-motivated manner and that their views are your politics. [Q27]9. POLITICS IN EDUCATIONThe BLM movement, however it manifests itself, is a political movement. Council officers are allowed to reflect council policy, for instance the Borough Plan in considering planning applications.  In respect of education and politics they are not, nor should they seek to influence schools and teachers in respect of a particular political outlook, neither should a local authority, neither should schools.Schools have a legal duty to teach children about politics in a balanced way.  The Education Act 1996, Part V. Ch IV at 406 1 (b) prohibits “the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school” and at 407 requires that (1) the local education authority, governing body and head teacher shall take such steps … that where political issues are brought to the attention of pupils (b) they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views.“There is no reason why a teacher should not discuss the BLM Movement, but it should be done in an objective, non-partisan manner.  That is not what is proposed here. Here, we have a union-led endeavour supported by Labour MPs, with a left-wing doctrinaire agenda, evident in, for instance, the “corbynated” attitude to the British Empire and your adding “BLM” to the ELP’s list of committees as though it were one of its functions. Will you explain how your present activity conforms to your obligations under the Act? [Q28]Within in each section I have numbered the questions and requests in square brackets so that you can keep a tally of them.  Please answer them by number, rather than by generalised, catch-all comments. 

Andrew Farmer ● 1720d5 Comments ● 1718d

Major Squeeze on Parking Spaces in the Borough

It is disappointing not to have had the opportunity to have commented on the plan to convert lots of parking spaces in the borough to electronic car charing stations. I'm not against it in principle as it is clearly necessary that if there are more electric cars they will need more places to charge them. However, more consideration needs to be given to the implications of the sharp reduction in the number of parking spaces in the borough.We would all, I would hope, by now have reduced the amount we use our cars by and cut out unnecessary short journeys. However, it is only a small proportion of families that can dispense with a car altogether and the rest of us need somewhere to park them.The LTNs planned across the borough all seem to be taking out quite a few parking spaces.All those new flats being built, while notionally car free, will inevitably cause more pressure on available parking space. We all know the dodges used by people - dubious blue badge claims, business permits etc. to be able to park.Once the number of parking spaces falls below the number of cars needing to park in the area then you will see an increase in traffic in residential areas as people circle round looking for space. Combined with LTN restrictions this could mean some roads that were previously quiet will have a constant stream of traffic.If you think it is worth the price consider the position of a woman who works irregular hours and needs a car for her work coming home at night and not being able to park particularly close to her home.

Tricia Arbuthnot ● 1733d20 Comments ● 1721d

Decolonising the curriculum?!

We learn from Ealing Today that the borough is involved in a drive to ‘decolonize the curriculum and to replace it with anti-racist learning’. Are teachers surprised to be told that their current teaching has been ‘racist’? What is going on in Ealing? Who is messing with the curriculum in our secondary schools and on what authority?  The school curriculum is established in law. It’s intended beneficiaries are pupils and parents.   If change to the curriculum is envisaged, these are the “stakeholders” who need first to be considered and who should lead the conversation, not the Ealing Learning Partnership, a quango condescending from above.  And not unions.   One wonders how loudly the voices of parents and pupils are heard in the ELP, directly even, rather than mediated by headteachers.  What does the ELP do?  Six committees have been established.  How often do they meet?  Are minutes kept?  Unfortunately, if I want to read more, “full access is only available to registered users from schools and settings that subscribe to the Ealing Learning Partnership” and user accounts are currently only available for Ealing maintained schools and academies staff and Ealing LA staff.  Why Ealing LA staff?   Why not parents and pupils?  Why not concerned council-tax payers who are funding the enterprise?  The idea that the ELP can operate in secrecy, without scrutiny by those most concerned, is outrageous.  If this organisation is publicly funded, its papers should be publicly available. The ELP also provides information and guidance relating to Black Lives Matter and anti-racism, and presentations addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matter protests.  It is produced by the Hackney Learning Trust and shared with Ealing in the spirit of collaboration, but of course not shared with Ealing Council council-tax payers.  Sadly, I can’t ask the date of the next demo and what to take along to throw at a policeman.  Is it a LA’s role to give advice about protests, particularly one with a politically motivated agenda and violent reputation?What, as council-tax payers are we getting for our money in funding the ELP?  The recent contribution of Ms Julie Lewis (Ealing’s director learning, standards and school partnerships) to Ealing Today suggests not much. She tells Ealing Today a ‘huge amount’ is being done to tackle the under achievement of Black Caribbean students in the borough and that the ‘learning outcome of this work is ……of much wider and greater significance.’ Ms Lewis had the opportunity to tell Ealing Today’s reporter something specific, but her comments amount to little more than amorphous guff. In this she is matched by the contribution from Stefan Simms, secretary of Ealing’s National Education Union. He is another master of vague superlatives, ‘immense amount of enthusiasm and willingness’. Is that really worth saying?    The whole of the ELP’s literature is couched in this embarrassing mission-statement drivel because of course it has A VISION.  Don’t they all!  Mr Simms goes further than Ms Lewis. He takes on the current curriculum in English in schools: ‘Michael Gove insisted that the English curriculum has a lot of dead white men in it’. Well, he didn’t actually. It was Mary Bousted, General Secretary of the National Education Union, thinking, no doubt, of Fevre and Bancroft’s Dead White Men and Other Important People (2010, 2016). She said, 'schools must look beyond dead white men to make the curriculum more diverse'.   Leaving that aside, Mr Simms goes on to say ‘there is a wealth of other authors and poets that can be studied that would be just as good, just as relevant, and perhaps more engaging for our population.’   The idea, in that last phrase, that literature can be better studied because it mirrors the consumer’s own culture and, thereby, becomes more engaging defeats the object of teaching which is to extend the pupil’s awareness from the familiar to the less familiar. Did it not cross Mr Simms’ mind that, if Shakespeare were not still relevant today, he would long ago have joined the ranks of the dead forgotten? I recently saw young children in a production of The Tempest in a London primary school, simplified and abbreviated and incorporating additional songs and dances but performed with huge vigour, enthusiasm and excitement by a cast of widely differing ethnicities. They also gave us Macbeth (another of that dead white man’s efforts) with several Macbeths and Lady Macbeths from a variety of races. A clever way of making long roles more manageable and the whole thing very enjoyable for actors and audience.  Mr Simms and those who think like him fail to appreciate just how alive those dead white men are for kids and would seek to deprive them of the opportunity of finding out. It is noticeable that pressure for change to the curriculum does not come from kids. It comes from adults who have their own agendas. Kids do not, to my knowledge, quarrel with the curriculum qua curriculum. They get on with doing The Hunger Games or whatever and get something out of it.Pupils’ under-achievement is a complex issue. A recent article by Jonny Brooks-Bartlett, a Black Caribbean graduate in Maths with a Ph D from Oxford, in the magazine Chalkdust never once mentions deficiencies/ biases in school curricula to explain Black Caribbean under-achievement. On balance, he suggests, under achievement stems from the narrow expectations of parents, encouraging children in subjects which they think will lead to good jobs, and, mistakenly, failing to encourage proficiency in other subjects which have equally good career prospects. I do not know if he is right. But, I think, on balance the socio-economic positioning of Black Caribbean children is far more likely to explain their underachievement than a school curriculum that needs to be decolonised.           

vincent paul wrigley ● 1747d11 Comments ● 1743d

The Perverse closure of Occupation Lane

Hounslow Council is claiming a victory in closing Occupation Lane.Only within hours some facts have come to light that expose the using of Covid as a front for Traffic schemes as a complete deception to residents.Today has seen motor cyclists using Occupation Lane as a race track and making a mockery of the concrete blocks which now prevent any sort of pursuit.This already dodgy to be after dark location which is according to CovidTraffic is "deemed a suitable place to walk and cycle will no doubtt be a new haven for drug dealing and low level crime.But worse still. This is the main route for access to Clayponds Hospital. This is where patients go for rehabilitation from operations and long term injuries and ailments.  Being a rather isolated location are the Covid Traffic experts answering why this has been made almost inaccessible?No because they have not even considered it. Older people are  to relevant to their policy idealsCertainly not infirm elderly, they are going to die of Covid anyway so lets forget them.Clearly the attitude of several Labour Councillors in both Ealing and Hounslow and several senior officers.They have overlooked that Occupation Lane was resurfaced sans Speed humps to allow smooth transit for patients being driven by ambulance or private vehicles, it took years for this to take place and constant requests from Ramp Ambulance drivers and other care drivers. Largely because the roads south of Clayponds have been notorious for 40 years plus with dreadful road surfaces and narrow pinch points.The roads have been resurfaced but speed humps remain that are not possible for ambulances to completely avoid and two full speed humps are in bad condition and cannot be avoided.The Lane was the original access road to the Hospital until part of the site was sold off and the hospital rebuilt but the access was moved.So now we have patients and local patients mainly of Ealing placed at risk when transported particularly after treatment and a racetrack and criminal activity site that will no doubt use up more of the Police budget.Just how incompetent are these experts? And why not a word from councillors who will have to take the rap for such myopic knee-jerk implementation of schemes? Early making best use of resources for the NHS or those who support patient care.

Raymond Havelock ● 1757d10 Comments ● 1747d

One can but hope that the new sports centre in Gunnersbury Park burns down too- Gunnersbury Feedback

Gunnersbury Park was established as a place of recreation for the people of Ealing not as a charitable/non-profit organisation for the paying of Sir Somebody-or-other's extortionate salary for running it. It is bounded by three council estates, what did the trustees directors or whoever think was going to happen when then tried to create an haute-cuisine dining experience that charged three times as much as the affordable -public service' (and much loved) cafe did? If they ever catch whoever torched this travesty of public trust that is the new restaurant I hope to contribute to their defence fund, they performed a public service. I can only hope that a similar 'act-of-God' strikes the new sports centre that is designed to provide revenue to fund the salaries of charity/non-profit liggers and not to provide value recreation to local, and often disadvantaged local residents. So much for the 'Gunnersbury Park Historic Buildings Survey ExtendedYour views on uses for small mansion and stables wanted' article on today's Ealing Today, there is plenty of feedback, albeit in the form of arson, it is just that nobody is listening. Endless input to local councillors who view it as more important (and put in more effort) to preserve the operation of their favourite late-night drug-dealing drinking joints than to preserve a useful and accessible public space and facility

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1766d7 Comments ● 1766d

Two metres/Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission

Let us hope Boris does not reduce the social distancing requirements to one metre or three feet in response to requests by pub, restaurant, bar and other hostility trade businesses when they re-open'Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts say' - CNNhttps://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-05-28-20-intl/index.html14 hr 47 min agoSix feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts sayFrom CNN’s Arman AzadPublic health officials have called on people to stay six feet apart to slow the spread of coronavirus through so-called respiratory droplets. But three experts are warning that six feet may not be enough – and they say the world needs to take airborne transmission of the virus seriously.In a commentary published in the journal Science, the experts called for “regular, widespread testing” to find asymptomatic cases, and they pointed to places where mask wearing is universal and the virus has been controlled, like Hong Kong and Taiwan. World Health Organization guidance might not be enough in all situations, they said.“Evidence suggests that (the novel coronavirus) is silently spreading in aerosols exhaled by highly contagious infected individuals with no symptoms,” wrote Chia Wang of National Sun Yat-sen University in Taiwan and Kimberly Prather and Dr. Robert Schooley of the University of California, San Diego.    “Increasing evidence for (the coronavirus) suggests the six foot WHO recommendation is likely not enough under many indoor conditions where aerosols can remain airborne for hours, accumulate over time, and follow air flows over distances further than six feet,” they wrote.The three experts, who are specialists in chemistry and infectious diseases, said aerosols from breathing and speaking “can accumulate, remain infectious in indoor air for hours, and be easily inhaled deep into the lungs.” That makes wearing masks all the more essential, they said, even when people are keeping their distance. More on this: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has focused on so-called respiratory droplets produced when a person coughs or sneezes. The droplets don’t linger in the air for long, but the CDC says they “can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs.” Spread is more likely when people are in close contact with one another, or “within about 6 feet,” the CDC says. That’s because respiratory droplets are relatively large and fall to the ground – unlike aerosols, which are smaller and more likely to stay in the air longer.Despite the focus on droplets from US health officials and others, the experts said “a large proportion of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) appears to be occurring through airborne transmission of aerosols produced by asymptomatic individuals during breathing and speaking.” While more research is needed, they called for robust testing schemes and said people need to mask up. “For society to resume, measures designed to reduce aerosol transmission must be implemented, including universal masking and regular, widespread testing to identify and isolate infected asymptomatic individuals,” they said.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1796d15 Comments ● 1767d

Stop Press Shock Horror Probe Expose Revisionist UK Govment change truth to say face masks useful

Stop Press Shock Horror Probe Expose Revisionist Flat-Earther Post Truth Fake News UK Government to change truth to say face masks now useful against Covid-19 illnessThe Government is about to re-write the truth as it builds a stockpile of face masks for the public to use in shops and on public transport as it might  actually  help to control the spread of Coronavirus (now THAT is sarcasm Mr Trump) having told us that face masks are of no use for the public. Meanwhile, Nicola Sturgeon has told the Scots to wear masks. I wonder what chinless-wonder-inbred-Whitehall-SAGEMEMBER-public-school-Atheneum-Club-Member had to be 'put down' to get the fact that face mask might be useful past the flat-earth society?https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/28/sturgeon-urges-scots-to-wear-coronavirus-face-masks-for-shopping-and-travelSturgeon says Scots should wear face masks for shopping and travelFirst minister issues new virus guidance but insists there is no ‘divide or split’ with UK adviceSturgeon says Scots should wear face masks for shopping and travelFirst minister issues new virus guidance but insists there is no ‘divide or split’ with UK advicehttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/britain-to-stockpile-masks-for-public-to-use-while-shopping-and-on-transport-b8d3vbm2d Britain to stockpile masks for public to use while shopping and on transport | News | The TimesBritain is to build a stockpile of face masks for people to wear while shopping and on public transport, it was announced, after Nicola Sturgeon pre-empted what is expected to be UK-wide guidance.Thewww.thetimes.co.ukBritain to stockpile masks for public to use while shopping and on transportBritain is to build a stockpile of face masks for people to wear while shopping and on public transport, it was announced, after Nicola Sturgeon pre-empted what is expected to be UK-wide guidance.The Scottish first minister confirmed that the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) had concluded that covering the face with a scarf or other cloth mask would probably help to slow the transmission of coronavirus in confined spaces as she recommended that people wore them “as a precautionary measure”.-

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1826d12 Comments ● 1779d

NAJSAREK and BELL

An open letter to Julian Bell.Dear Julian Bell,We have again had contact with Mr Najsarek and again have cause to doubt his integrity and suitability to occupy the post of CEO.  The question of how he managed to gain employment with Ealing Council will not go away. In February 2016, when he was appointed, you wrote: “I am delighted that we have been able to attract someone of Paul’s calibre to Ealing …Paul has an excellent record of achievement in local government”.: All we knew of his record in his previous appointment in Bolton was that he had been in his post there a short while.On June 30 2016, we learned from the national press, that, when he applied for his job here in Ealing, he had taken legal action to prevent his behaviour in his previous employment becoming known.  His “record of achievement” in Bolton was a front-page scandal: he was, it seemed from the reports, a financial liability and a man who could not be trusted to keep his word.  We had been sold or you had bought for us the CEO equivalent of a “dodgy motor”.  Ealing Council did not even see fit to comment on the disquieting disclosure. We cannot blame you for Mr Najsarek’s appointment if you were deceived as we were.  The question is: Were you? Did you already know anything of what appeared in the press on June 30 2016 in respect of Mr Najsarek’s behaviour in Bolton when you appointed him? “Yes” or “No” will do by way of a response.  Your sincerely,Andrew Farmer

Andrew Farmer ● 1785d16 Comments ● 1779d

Ealing's Lending to Thurrock - when will they ever learn?

I found the report on this site about Ealing council's loans to Thurrock both compelling and unsettling. However, there was a serious omission in the article in that no mention was made of Ealing's previous problems with loans made to Icelandic banks.Without that history it could be argued that it was perfectly reasonable for Ealing to lend to Thurrock because the risk was close to zero but that is exactly what was said when they joined in the rush to lend to a number of Icelandic banks that nobody had previously heard of. Just like Thurrock, Iceland ended up with an unsustainable debt burden. I think in the end Ealing got most of its capital back but it was still a grave error of judgement.Hammersmith & Fulham seem to have dodged this particular bullet but that is probably because they put in proper oversight when their officers lost huge sums gambling on index swaps.The management of councils' spare cash seems to be an area that is desperately short of regulation. Time and again some council officer with visions of being a master of the Universe in the City forgets that there is an unbreakable relationship between risk and reward. If someone is willing to pay you a higher rate for the money they borrow from you then there will always be a reason.Thurrock looks set to unwind in quite a messy way. No council is going to be willing to roll over loans and the point will come when won't be able to repay their creditors. I don't know where Ealing will be in the queue but the prospect of a very nasty loss is there at the very time when it is least needed. The hope would be that the government can sweep this under the carpet and cover any losses from Councils that lent to Thurrock but the worry is that there are many other councils at the same game and a systemic collapse of inter-council lending is on the cards. When that particular tide goes out we will find out who hasn't got any swimming trunks.

Gordon Southwell ● 1791d2 Comments ● 1790d

The Council's Corrupted Complaints Procedure

WE HAVE A PROBLEM Ealing Council’s corrupted complaints procedure.    The procedure is fine.  The senior officers who run it are not. I complained about a green rubbish collection.  It was sorted out immediately by a junior duty officer. However, when I and five neighbours complained about the conduct of senior officers, it was dealt with by senior officers. They failed to treat with us with honestly.The reason is obvious. Complaints against senior officers are dealt with by senior colleagues who in all likelihood know them and with whom they may have social or other relationships.   Though their obligation as public servants is to deal with complaints with IMPARTIALITY, they act as “counsel for the defence” for their friends, in contravention of the Council’s Code for Employees and the Seven Principles of Public Life.  They bring the Council into disrepute. A FORMULA FOR CORRUPTION has emerged.  To avoid investigating allegations against senior colleagues, officers (1) claim the matter has already been dealt with, (2) fail to produce evidence of that when asked to demonstrate it is other than a lie, and (3) attempt to terminate the procedure prematurely, denying complainants the right that Council policy affords them to request escalation.  In particularly disgraceful examples, (4) this has been accompanied by a threat to accuse the complainant of being a “persistent complainant” and deny them Council services if they continued to assert their right.  If this fails, they (5) falsely claim the complaint has run its course in the internal procedure so that they can foist their responsibility off onto the Local Government Ombudsman. The latest news: the Council’s senior legal officer colluded with a senior colleague about whom a complaint had been made and allowed her herself to decide whether the complaint against her should go ahead!  She decided to ignore it.   Well, she would, wouldn’t she!   Ealing’s senior legal officer seems unaware of the principle of natural justice that no one should be judge of their own cause (Nemo Judex in Causa Sua). We have been obliged to make complaints against a succession of seven officers as the lie (“already dealt with”) has been passed down the line.  “Tell one for the team” seems to be the esprit de corps in Ealing’s top offices. Our most serious concerns are with the officers who presently control the complaints procedure:  Ms Reynolds, Director of Customer and Transactional Services and so in charge of Ealing’s complaints procedure,  Ms Harris Director of Legal and Democratic Services and Mr Najserak, the CEO. What is needed is a PUBLIC enquiry by an independent agency into the behaviour of these officers in which they can be called to account and questioned by the complainants.   And that should be the arrangement whenever a complaint against a senior officer reaches stage three.   A system of that kind might enjoy confidence.  I have put this matter to every one of Ealing’s elected members.  They may at present be concerned with constituents’ problems, but I am hoping they may at an appropriate time in the future be able to respond.   The problem is not going to go away.

Andrew Farmer ● 1808d5 Comments ● 1806d

We are being lied to by Matt Hancock Secretary of State Health Social Care about the NHS Restoration

Beware, the NHS Restoration that Matt Hancock Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is a complete lie. What is more likely is that you will receive a discharge letter like I received today from the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in the form of St Mary's Hospital for treatment that you have battled to get for years and fought to get. There will be no prcoessing of people in queues or waiting for treatment or starting treatment, no catch-up, no restoration, Mr Hancock is a LIAR. You will get a letter with the words: "Dear Patient, Due to the ongoing situation with Coronavirus pandemic,..... As it could be an extended time until normal planned services can resume, the clinical team have confirmed that under the current circumstances it would be appropriate to return your care to your GP in the short term, where you will ne able to refer at a later date if necessary."A nice simple way to fudge the statistics, refer your patients undergoing treatment back to their GPs so that they can wait for a FEW MORE YEARS before getting another referral.So much for the bollocks that Hancock said today: 'our message is that the NHS is open', 'seek help as you always would', 'the NHS will always be there as you need it', and 'starting tomorrow we will strt the restoration of the NHS.Absolutely a restoration once ALL THE PATIENTS HAVE BEEN DISCHARGED.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1827d12 Comments ● 1810d

WAITROSE and SOCIAL DISTANCING

Am I alone in finding West Ealing Waitrose falling sadly short of government requirements re social distancing during the Covid 19 crisis?Customers, for the most part, are not at fault. They keep two metres apart while waiting for the store to open but staff seem to think they are immune from the virus and the need to observe social distancing. I was waiting in the queue this morning at 7.15. A member of staff came bustling up to me and I had to put my hand out to tell her to 'Back off, please, and observe the 2 metre rule.' Her reply? 'Don't talk to me like that'.Once inside the shop, customers and shelf-stackers get in each other's way and the 2 metre rule goes out of the window. Shelf-stacking when the store is open early for more vulnerable customers is not a good idea. This morning, as I left the store, I looked in at the window and could hardly believe my eyes. The manager was holding a meeting in the cafeteria area (currently out of use qua cafeteria) with some 12 or so members of his staff where, if anything, there was less than one metre between persons. I felt grateful that there was a plate-glass window between me and that aberrancy.I sympathise with shop-keepers. Social distancing is not easy to enforce, but, currently, Waitrose is setting a poor example and, since Covid 19 is likely to be with us for a long time, it needs to scrutinise current practice and make changes. Let's start with a  wipe of trolley-handles (90% isopropyl, please). Tesco does it. Why not Waitrose? After that, better instore practice needs to follow. Customers and staff don't want to be exposed to unnecessary transmission risks nor do they want, potentially, to add to the massive burden already on NHS shoulders.

vincent paul wrigley ● 1831d10 Comments ● 1830d

Why SARS-CoV-2, Why Covid? Some thoughts

Pope says Covid-19 pandemic could be nature's "response" to climate change (CNN)For those of us looking for meaning in this plague about why SARS-Cov-2 and Covid-19 happened the Roman Catholic Pope Francis is providing food for thought into the "why" as we go into the great Christian festival of Easter. The philospher and spiritual leader thinks that, (according to CNN https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-04-08-20/h_fa578270a745eb4e5b1321742a5a87f4), 'The coronavirus outbreak is one of “nature’s responses” to human beings ignoring the ecological crisis, said Pope Francis Wednesday.“We did not respond to the partial catastrophes. Who now speaks of the fires in Australia, or remembers that 18 months ago a boat could cross the North Pole because the glaciers had all melted? Who speaks now of the floods?" the Pope told British Catholic journalist Austen Ivereigh in an email interview published Wednesday in The Tablet and Commonwealth magazines.thI don’t know if these are the revenge of nature, but they are certainly nature’s responses.”Pope Francis also said he is recovering from his bronchitis and praying even more from his residence in the Vatican during this "time of great uncertainty."Francis revealed he goes to confession every Tuesday to ask forgiveness for his own selfishness. “I take care of things there,” he said.Francis said the homeless should be quarantined in hotels and not in parking lots.“A photo appeared the other day of a parking lot in Las Vegas where they [the homeless] had been put in quarantine. And the hotels were empty. But the homeless cannot go to a hotel,” the Pope said.“This is the moment to see the poor,” he said, whom society often treats as "rescued animals."The Pope warned against the rise of populist politicians, who he said are giving speeches reminiscent of Hitler in 1933, and others who are focusing solely on the economy.“I am worried by the hypocrisy of certain political personalities who speak of facing up to the crisis, of the problem of hunger in the world, but who in the meantime manufacture weapons,” he said.“Today I believe we have to slow down our rate of production and consumption and to learn to understand and contemplate the natural world."The Pope encouraged people at home on lockdown to find creative ways of being at home.“Take care of yourselves for a future that will come,” Francis said.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1844d2 Comments ● 1844d

Time to Postpone Trade Talks with the EU?

It perplexes me that more people are not raising the obvious question of why we are intending to persist with reshaping our relationship with the EU, a path which will involve a huge amount of dislocation for our economy when the coronavirus is already causing this to happen. This doesn't mean rejoining the EU but postponing the trade talks and remaining aligned with the single market until we are clear of the current crisis. The massive demands that the talks will place on an already overstretched civil service are bound to create a range of difficulties.Our PM is not known for his work ethic but even a more conscientous leader would struggle to cope with the workload that will be placed on them.If we leave the EU during a pandemic we reduce the ability of our universities to work with other institutions in Europe to develop a cure.It has already been reported that outside EU institutions we will not have the same access to EU developed vaccines that hopefully will become available.We have over the past few days had ample demonstration how even minor disruptions to supply chains can lead to hoarding and shortages. If the pandemic is still an issue and any new trading arrangement interrupt the free low of goods, there will be far worse scenes in our local shops and many people will have to go without basic essentials.The notion that freedom of movement presents an extra risk during a pandemic has been thoroughly disproven with EU countries closing their borders to each other for health reasons.If you don't agree that trade talks should be put on hold could you explain to me what are the benefits which outweigh all the negatives detailed above?

Mark Evans ● 1869d27 Comments ● 1862d

GOOD NEWS.

Although we are going through a worldwide crisis, possibly never known so bad in human history, things are going to get better. The Bible promises: "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." ( Revelation 21 v 4.) At present the whole world is going through a period known as the "last days" of a system that is about to be put right.2 Timothy 3:1-5 New International Version (NIV) says:(1)"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. (2) People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, (3) without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, (4) treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— (5) having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people."Is that a huge coincindence or is that an apt description of how many people in the world are today?Luke 21:10-11 New International Version (NIV) states:10 Then he (Jesus) said to them: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events........"What is happening worldwide surely qualifies as seeing fulfillment today.This is the storm before the calm.“ALL creation keeps on groaning together and being in pain together until now.” So said the apostle Paul. (Romans 8:22) Despite advances in medical science, sickness and death continue to plague the human race. How wonderful, then, the promise that climaxes this part of Isaiah’s prophecy! Imagine the time when “no resident will say: ‘I am sick.’” (Isaiah 33:24)

Neil Milkins ● 1863d0 Comments ● 1863d

CllrJulian Bell on Covid-19 Response "This is the time to get to get the reserves out and use them.”

I watched some children playing with their parents on the playground equipment in Walpole Park earlier and I wondered if you knew that the contagious result of touching the equpment even thee days later lingers there up to three days. The same with sports equipment in the park or in the gym. Likewise in a pub or cafe or restaurant oor even a business meeting,,microscopic water droplets hang in the air after an infected persons' visit for three hours, and were infectious for up to that long. Could Ealing not at least regulalry spray the outised playgrounds and sport equipment. Sadly running into Cllr Mik Saviers and Rupa Huq M.P a week ago I encountered a brick wall of ignorance, arrogrance, and a desire to spend nothing because onlo £9.8 million in the Council Reserves was available to Ealing Council and the rest was allocated. Oh their great emphasis was on the flu-related disaster plans that everyone had been touting in total ignorance of the enormous differece between flu and Covid-19. Unmitigated political bollocks from people who had no idea that there was  even Covid-19 in the Borough at that particular time.As the number of Covid-19 confirmed cases double from 21 to 42 overnight in Ealing  (as of 09:00) Wedneday 18th 2020 it was a belated relief to here an announcement by Council Leader Julian Bell:“I have already talked to my officers about how we need to have our own coronavirus emergency fund and use reserves for that,” Cllr Bell explained.“We always say reserves are for a rainy day and blimey this is a rainy day. This is the time to get the reserves out and use them.”First might I be so bold as to ask heim to a) empower chemists to make their own hand-sanitizer which they are not allowed to, b) divert front line staff to disinfect the children playground in the Boroughs, c) disinfect railings in popluar places such parks, tube stations, schools (those that are not closing), bus stop benches, ATM machines, lift buttons and interiors, buses, tube trains and trains, and perhaps even provide hand sanitisation stations all over the Borough, not forgetting any table or counter surface that has been touched as a plastic surface can carry an infectious load virus for up to three day. Likewise, ventilation is a must, and the virus droplets can hang around as microscopic droplets in the air around three hours and can causes infection, so open those hours and crack the air-conditioning system up to provide the most fresh coming in and old air getting out, it may be uncomfortable but it might save you from contracting the disease/ It is essential that hard surfaces like table and chairs and bar tops are regularly wiped and that the local cafes, pubs, glubs, restautans and their toilets and eashrooms are checked to make sure that there is soap hot water and towes and drierst ath workd (and perhaps some heatingin this cold weather too).The three hour aerosol virus in the air can be mitigated by goo ventilation such as opening windows and hours with the ait conditioning running on maximum fresh air into the building and old air oout of rather than recirculating it. Signs everwhere to remind people to wipe tables as well as thie hands.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1866d0 Comments ● 1866d

If you are self employed or a sole operator/trader

Many self employed are finding all their bookings and contracts being cancelled or postponed indefinitely.  Worse still many are having invoiced payments deferred using Coronavirus as justification.Many of these larger companies will be receiving help and directors may well be keeping their huge salaries and bonuses.There are several petitions to help long term self employed who pay Tax and NI in full but do not get any assistance that people in PAYE get.Govt on TV today stated Local Authorities have a remit to help but both Govt and Local council websites are full of hot air and no actual proper contact or pragmatic adviceHowever The House of Commons are asking for specific questions from this quite large sector of society so, as posted to me from others posted below for others for whom this is a concern.“Include self-employed in statutory sick pay during Coronavirus”:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300336As the result of the large numbers of petitions and signatures we've received on coronavirus, we will be putting your concerns and questions directly to the Government at an evidence session (a question and answer session with representatives from the Government) in the coming days.Tell us what question(s) you'd like us to the ask the Government and experts in this short survey: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/petitionscommittee/We'll email you again to let you know more about the session, including when it's going to happen, who'll be taking part and how you can watch it live.We will also email you a link to the video and a transcript of the session afterwards.Who are we?We are the House of Commons Petitions Committee. We are a cross-party group of MPs that looks at e-petitions submitted on petition.parliament.uk. We are independent from Government. You can find out more about us and our work on our website: http://www.parliament.uk/petitions-committee/role

Raymond Havelock ● 1867d0 Comments ● 1867d

Cases of Covid-19 in Ealing continue to rise while Ealing Council and Politians are in denail

As of 9 a.m. this morning Sunday March 8th there were five cases of Covid-19 in the London Borough of Ealing. In London there are now 51.In the last three days the London figure as gone from 22 to 48 to 51.I had occassion to run into one of our M.P.'s Dr Rupa Huq this morning being escorted around by a man who I think was Mik Sabiersmwo very rudely shut me down and was really most unpleasant. It appears Ealing is unwilling to do anything and will not spend any nmoney as there is "only £8.9 million" in the reserves that could be spent in the area of sanitising Ealing and the like. According to Mr Sabiers, it the "job of the local health authority"I wrote a letter to Dr Huq M.P. which follows, Dear Dr Huq, M.P.I am somewhat stunned by the attitude of the Councillor, Mik Sabiers, who was taking you around Ealing this morning. I have rarely encountered a less pleasant individual on the streets of Ealing. I hope I did not startle you too much when I imparted the information that you did not know about the five cases of Covid-19 confirmed in Ealing as of yesterday morning, or the that the number had risen to 38 from 28 the day before for the whole of London. I tried to ask why if New York had declared a state of emergency for 17 cases why London had as yet to do anything. Your colleagues intervention at this point was inappropriate and very rude. He was wrong to say that this was an issue for the Health Authority. I had more to say, and following on from your article in Ealing Today about combating loneliness by stopping and talking to people  I took to mean that you actually cared about talking to people. Your colleague sent you away and handled me in a most dismissive and contemptuous manner. When I pointed out to him that he had been rude in interrupting my conversation with you and sending you away, he said that it is I who had in fact been rude, and that you were out to meet people. I guess I am not important enough to qualify. I tried to take to him about Covid-19 preparedness and got a load of political b/s. As he became more and more obnoxious about communication anything in a conversation I pressed him on the point of sanitation of bus stops, benches, etc, and all he did was become more and more agitated. He gave funding as an issues, and I pointed that there were reserves that could be spent, he said that only £8.9 million was available as the rest was committed, I pointed out that that would be a good start. I told him that he was the most obnoxious and unpleasant politician that I had ever eoncountered, to which he said: "Good" before leaving.I would strongly suggest that you not associate yourself with him on the streets of Ealing as he is doing nothing to win votes for the Labour Party at either the Council or Central Government level,What a horrible man,Yours sincerely,Mark Raymond,Ealing

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1877d4 Comments ● 1877d

Is our real problem Ealing's pension deficit?

Watching the rugby at the weekend I got into conversation with another group of people who were in the same bar and it turned into a very convivial afternoon. Given the result we wanted to talk about something more cheery so natuarally the subject switched to pensions rather than the match.The chap I was talking to seemed to know his stuff and told me that Ealing Council in particular had a major problem with their fund which was running a very substantial deficit. He said most local authorities had an issue because fewer people were joining council schemes because of outsourcing and head count reduction and more and more people were retiring and living longer but Ealing's short fall was more than most. He also said that at some point soon, just like many companies the borough will have to start covering the deficit which could be in the region of half a billion. There is no prospect that scheme income will make it self funding because, although head count has reduced, average salaries have increased significantly and generous early retirement packages remain in place. He said that Ealing like many other councils have reduced costs by persuading people to take retirement. This is actually more expensive but pushes when it needs to be paid for out into the future. His estimate was that by the end of this decade local taxes would need to double to make sure the pension fund was adequately funded.I really don't know enough about pensions and the way they work to know if this is alarmist nonesense or a timely warning. I have heard people say similar things before. It there anyone with expertise in these matters who could comment?

Andy Jones ● 1909d6 Comments ● 1893d

The Slow Death of the BBC

I was vaguely aware of how these might be difficult times for the BBC but until I read some coverage of recent event and spoke to people with some direct knowledge this weekend, I had little conception of how bad things where. The four hundred or so people who were sacked recently were told in no uncertain terms that they lost their jobs because the corporation needed to make savings after all the pay increases that became necessary after the Samira Ahmed judgement. They are so terrified of legal action about unfair pay (even from men) that they have erred on the side of caution. As they can no longer use the excuse of celebrity or public profile for paying someone more then they have to pay 'star' wages to people who are clearly not stars.  If this was the extent of their problems then they could weather the storm but this government (particular Dominic Cummings) really wants the corporation dismantled. The decriminalisation of non payment of the licence fee might seem a rational and fair move but it will have a massive impact on the BBC's finances as well having to fund over-75s licence fees. Restrictions on licence fee increases means that the ongoing squeeze on the BBC will continue and accelerate. Like most organisations forced to cut costs they seem incapable of trimming in the middle management executive positions where most of the fat is and content creation is where most of the jobs are going. They also have quite intractable unions to deal with and a pension fund deficit of £1.9bn and rising. Increasingly what's left of the BBC licence fee will go to fund this deficit and the pay of an unsackable but unproductive layer of middle management and fewer and fewer programmes will be made.

Gordon Southwell ● 1904d26 Comments ● 1894d

Ealing Labour Council and the hypocrisy of building 27 Council Homes

Ref: Ealing Council building 27 council homes on Dabbs Hill and Eastcote LaneLooking at the land in question, they could have built a lot more than 27 homes for council housing purposes.The phrase 'smoke and mirrors' comes to mind, and I would like Ealing Today to ask why this large expanse of land is only suitable for a total development of 45 homes (when you add the shared ownership angle and 4 private ones) at 4 storeys high when developers are convincing the Council to build 300 homes in high rise buildings, at 30 storeys,  in North Acton with only a small fraction going to take anyone off the council waiting list.I suppose we all know the answer though don't we...housing developers approaching the council prefer the resale capability of Acton etc, closer to the City etc, more £ for building smaller units if you are a major house builder.It seems the Council will headline this development, get pictured in their non-pressed, non-matching chinos and suit jacket (my word is this man Julian Bell really the leader of our area?), but it does nothing to address the concerns of normal people in our area that we are having our amenity provision and character ruined for generations by a Council completely hell bent on following Sadiq Khan's housing target numbers - that will do wonders for him as national politician, but erode communities that make up our city.They make a big play on this consultation - they only consult when it suits them!  Ask the residents over the type of consultation that go on by their established partner A2 Dominion for instance,  they put an animated, line drawing together in their recent proposals for West Ealing that even masked the height of the development, and did one afternoon presentation in the basement of a pub, and this consultation was for 25 storeys!  You could always email in though.....They only consult properly when it suits them, and I implore Ealing Today and all media organisations to get to the root of the issues here not just picture them handing over a set of keys and run a press release from them.I am really, really disappointed in Ealing Labour generally, the glad handing on this and it's telling that James Murray MP has joined the charade as he like the rest of the MPs are quick to tell us that planning is the Council's responsibility - so can we now write to him now and expect a valid response on the monstrosities that are planned in our Borough?  That have a small fraction of social housing element, but get waved through planning on this basis?  He wants pictured here on a planning housing issue so is it now permissible he will get involved in all matters on housing?Anyway not long now for Ealing's Labour Council and friends annual jolly to MPIM, a property conference, and sell off more of our Borough!

Steve Young ● 1915d16 Comments ● 1900d

Fuller Smith and Turner's Ecological Hypocrisy in Rose and Crown South Ealing's Plastic Lawn

Friends of mine continue to be shocked by the petroleum product based plastic lawn that now carpets the garden at the back. Not a living blade of grass. Not a living thing.Few who went into the Rose and Crown last summer were not shocked by the appearance of acres of plastic lawn. Home of the Hanwell and Ealing Allotment Group, the Friends of the Ascott Allotment, and even Transition Town Ealing (not to mention Ealing'g green vicar, Steve, next door in St Mary's Church with his own ecological movement) one could not fathom Fuller's rationale behind this, clearly it was not going to grow the business by dumping a ton of petroleum-sourced chemical grass in the back garden, was it trying to distance itself from the ecowarriors?Not according to Fuller's website:https://www.fullers.co.uk/corporate/csr/environment"Environment"Fuller’s is committed to a programme of continuous environmental improvement, constantly investigating new ways to cut carbon emissions, reduce waste and save water."By targeting high-energy areas of the business, including kitchen extract, refrigeration and the lighting and heating of our pubs, we aim to match or exceed the UK Government’s long-term carbon reduction targets."The Government targets came into effect in 2008, and seek to reduce the nation’s overall emissions to 2,782 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e)"There is much on the Fuller's website about environmental responsibility and in the annual report too.What has gone wrong here at the Rose and Crown in South Ealing, a rogue establishment creating a blot in the Fuller's eco-copybook and eco-play. How can the local environmentalists cope with this sacrilige of theire favourite (once eco) venue?

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1904d4 Comments ● 1903d

Beware of new NO ENTRY sign on Manor Road, West Ealing when picking up your parcels

In November my wife got two PCNs for ignoring a brand new NO ENTRY sign on Manor Road which stops you going straight back out to Argyle Road after you have picked up your parcels from the Post Office depot on Manor Road.  Talking to the bloke in the enforcement van/car this new restriction has been in place for three weeks and they are giving out lots of tickets.  My wife is not the type to ignore street signs but she is the type to not notice that the road layout has changed if it is only discreetly signed.   There is no NO LEFT TURN sign on the adjacent Drayton Road and there are no yellow additional information signs of the type the council was forced to put up when they changed the layout around the Town Hall.  It is a bit of a trap for the unwary.  I will post some photos underneath.  The council must know that Manor Road attracts infrequent but regular visitors who are likely to get caught by a change in the road layout.  I did ask the guy behind the counter in the Post Office if they could put up a sign to inform their customers but he was practically indignant that I should suggest such a thing.  Jobsworthism still alive and well in the privatised Post Office parcels business.  In passing I asked a CEO (traffic warden in old money) why they didn't ticket the Post Office vans on the single yellow lines outside the Post Office.  Apparently the parking managers insists they wait 20 minutes!  So one rule for the Post Office and one rule for everyone else.

Phil Taylor ● 1970d12 Comments ● 1906d

Is Expanding Durston House School good for everyone?

I should say from the outset I'm very much against private education in principle and would readily accept its prevalence in the UK is divisive and chronically undermines social mobility. However we have the education system that we have and lack the funds to build a perfect one. Therefore we have to consider what is best for everyone. The big argument for private education and the general good is that it takes the cost of education a significant number of children away from the state. The provision of a hundred extra places by Durston House will be one hundred fewer than the rest of us have to pay for. There are good reasons for people in the area around the school to be concerned about extra traffic but most of this is not generated by the school rather it is the result of council policy. Traffic caused by the school will be concentrated into two relatively short and predictable periods each day. Having lived near a school myself I know it is just a matter of avoiding unnecessary travel at these times to ensure the impact on your life is minimal. The current application seems to provide the option of more facilities that will be available to the local community. What people shouldn't forget is that ultimately planning applications are decided on the basis of whether or not they are within planning law not whether they have public support. The land belongs to the school and if expansion is turned down they might consider alternative uses that would be even less welcome.

Dennis O'Shea ● 2196d25 Comments ● 1916d

Avoid B&Q Chiswick it no longer has toilets for customers, practically no plants in thegarden centre

I have written to B and Q, meanwhile the nearest facilities are probably a tree Gunnersbury Park 200 yards up the North Circular Road over the railway bridge. Be prepared. The question that comes to mind is B&Q running the Chiswick store down to close it?To the CEO of B & QWhere have the toilets gone in B&Q Chiswick? Why has the garden centre got no seasonal stock like trees and shrubs? Are you closing the store?Mr Graham BellCEOB and QUK and IrelandDear Mr Bell,I make no excuses about contacting a man as busy as you are as I was absolutely stunned when I (somewhat painfully) found out that the B&Q Superstore on the Chiswick Rooundabout in London no longer has toilets for customers. When I asked where they were I was told: "We don't have any". There have been toilets there in the past, I know I have made use of them. Is this a new policy for the whole of B&Q or unique to B&Q Chisiwck Roundabout (2 Larch Dr, Gunnersbury Ave, London W4 5QL)?.  As more progressive retailers move towards more enlightened facilities such as baby change and feeding areas. I find this move on the part of your company strange to say the least. I note that on your list of facilitieson the B&Q website  for this store include-Portable induction loops available-Customer wheelchairs available-Disabled parking bays availableBut with all this why no toilets?There is a bathroom showroom showing toilet, you can buy a toilet in the store, but there are no customer toilets for use by customers.I had noticed on recent visits the almost complete lack of living plant stock (to my inconvenience) in the garden centre which should be filled with trees and srhubs that are planted between late Autumn and early Spring, however it is barren. I must ask, are you about to close this store? That is the only explanation that I can find in my mind for the removal of basic sanitary facilities and the abscence of relevant seasonal garden stock?Somewhat flabbergasted,I remain,Yours sincerely,Mark Julian Raymond

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1928d15 Comments ● 1918d

The Victoria Hall DOES NOT NEED SAVING, help Ealing people rather than mouldering victoriana

The Victoria Hall (part of the Old Town Hall) DOES NOT NEED SAVING, it is a piece of uneconomic Vistoriana (of questionnable architectural merit as Charles Jones who designed and builtit apparently started off training as an architect, but ended up qualified as an engineer) that without the investment of several million poinds cannot be used for anything other than as a draughty Victorian hall. As libraries close, disabled centres disappear, mental health support disappears we are left with a bunch of second-rate activists looking for a cause. Hey, if we need a theatre then put a plan together, raise the money and build one, if it is economically viable as the acitivists claim then they should put their money where their mouths are, get a great big mortgage, put up their houses and business as collateral and make a fat profit, if it is not profitable then why are the people of Ealing being asked to underwrite a fools errand?If the plan was to turn it into half-way housing, short term social housing, a disabled support facility, a multi-media library resource facility, even a soup kitchem, so many things that people could get behind to hekp others in Ealing, however, a subsidised entertainment facility with a bar?To me it makes more sense to shed the overhead of this relic (having preserved its architectural heritage (such as it is) which is happening, move on and spend the money saved from not having to maintain this decaying facikity along with the money earned through renting it out to a hotel into something USEFUL, social housing, a libray, a much, much better option

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1934d22 Comments ● 1927d

MindFood - all our nature-based courses are FREE!!

Happy New Year from everyone at MindFood! For anyone who doesn’t know us yet, we are a small local charity (reg. no 1185639) running nature-based courses that help people to tackle stress, depression, anxiety and isolation. All our sessions are FREE, run 6 days a week, and we can sign you up right away...so why wait to feel better : )Our Growing Wellbeing courses are a fun and informal way to reconnect with nature, learn how to grow food, and pick up tips and techniques to improve wellbeing, like mindfulness. Participants can take home veg they’ve helped to grow, and can even join a free trip to Kew at the end. Here are the upcoming dates:Wed 22nd Jan 10.30-12.30 at Cleveley Crescent AllotmentsFriday 24th Jan 1-3.30pm at Cleveley Crescent Allotments (W5 1DZ)Tues 25th Feb at Horsenden Farm (UB6 7PB)We’ve chosen to run the Cleveley Crescent courses at around the same time to allow participants to swap into another session in the same week if they can’t make their usual one. This makes it easier to complete the whole programme - so these sessions are ideal for anyone juggling tricky work or care commitments. It’s even possible to join in week 2 if timing’s are tight.We also run Naturally Creative sessions at Horsenden on Thursdays 10-12, which combine mindful nature-based activities eg a walk or a forage (or both!) and an opportunity to develop your creative side with sketching, making collages, willow-weaving, and more...Every Saturday, we have Plot to Plate sessions at the Farm from 10-12 - they’re the ideal way to de-stress after a busy week, and a great way to meet more of your community.And finally, look out for details of our Seed Swap event in February - you’re sure to pick up a bargain, and some unusual finds. Follow us on facebook, or sign up for our monthly newsletter to stay up to date with our latest news.To sign up or find out more, just email Lucy at info@mindfood.org.uk

Lucy Clark ● 1929d0 Comments ● 1929d

MindFood - all our nature-based courses are FREE!!

Happy New Year from everyone at MindFood! For anyone who doesn’t know us yet, we are a small local charity (reg. no 1185639) running nature-based courses that help people to tackle stress, depression, anxiety and isolation. All our sessions are FREE, run 6 days a week, and we can sign you up right away...so why wait to feel better : )Our Growing Wellbeing courses are a fun and informal way to reconnect with nature, learn how to grow food, and pick up tips and techniques to improve wellbeing, like mindfulness. Participants can take home veg they’ve helped to grow, and can even join a free trip to Kew at the end. Here are the upcoming dates:Wed 22nd Jan 10.30-12.30 at Cleveley Crescent AllotmentsFriday 24th Jan 1-3.30pm at Cleveley Crescent Allotments (W5 1DZ)Tues 25th Feb at Horsenden Farm (UB6 7PB)We’ve chosen to run the Cleveley Crescent courses at around the same time to allow participants to swap into another session in the same week if they can’t make their usual one. This makes it easier to complete the whole programme - so these sessions are ideal for anyone juggling tricky work or care commitments. It’s even possible to join in week 2 if timing’s are tight.We also run Naturally Creative sessions at Horsenden on Thursdays 10-12, which combine mindful nature-based activities eg a walk or a forage (or both!) and an opportunity to develop your creative side with sketching, making collages, willow-weaving, and more...Every Saturday, we have Plot to Plate sessions at the Farm from 10-12 - they’re the ideal way to de-stress after a busy week, and a great way to meet more of your community.And finally, look out for details of our Seed Swap event in February - you’re sure to pick up a bargain, and some unusual finds. Follow us on facebook, or sign up for our monthly newsletter to stay up to date with our latest news.To sign up or find out more, just email Lucy at info@mindfood.org.uk

Lucy Clark ● 1929d0 Comments ● 1929d

Discover Me! open day today at Oaktree Acton

Your friendly local church, Oaktree, are putting on a number of events which might be of interest to people in the community on the theme of “Discover Me!” There will be an open day TODAY Saturday 11th January from 11am to 4pm at the Oaktree Centre at 216, High Street, Acton W3 9NX when people can come along and find out more / sign up – everyone very welcome!The groups will be running for 9/10 weeks from the end of the month and are as follows:West London Wellbeing CourseThis is a fun 9 week course covering themes such as move eat sleep relax - actions that can increase our health and happiness. There'll be a mix of video, individual and small group chat, and lots of fun.Sign up up on Eventbrite: bit.ly/38Poo03  The Enneagram HubWe will look at the 9 personality types, not for teaching an intellectual understanding, but for transformation and growth as a community, experiencing the Enneagram together.The Parenting Children CourseFamily life is under great pressure today and parents face bewildering choices about how to parent effectively. Discovering we are not alone in the challenges we face and picking up ideas from other parents can make a huge difference. We can all learn how to make even the happiest family better. The Parenting Children Course and The Parenting Teenagers Course were developed to equip parents and carers of children with long-term strategies and practical tools to build a healthy family life. Here is an introductory video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY8thZ_W2gYThe Marriage CourseA seven-session course designed to help couples invest in their relationship and build a stronger marriage. There is food, a practical talk, and a time for private discussion between you and your partner. There is no group work. It will help you build strong foundations, communicate more effectively and resolve any differences well. Here is a video flyer: www.youtube.com/watch?v=qba2wYpXgUs&feat…Finding God in PoetryPoetry allows one to see into the soul of another person, to see what is weighing on their minds and on their hearts, and can open doors to feelings that are sometimes suppressed until that door is opened" (Robert Brewer)This group is an invitation to reflect on these deepest thoughts and feelings, and to learn more about God and His relationship with us. No prior knowledge of poetry is required. Just a willingness to slow down, reflect and explore! Sign up here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/finding-god-in-poetry-tickets-87530340605The Bible CourseThis is a Bible Society course that uses a storyline to show how the key events, books and characters fit in the Bible. You get to see how the Bible applies to your life.If anyone is interested but can’t get to the open day today, feel free to PM me via the site.

Prabal Ray ● 1934d1 Comments ● 1933d

Recycle Your Cooking Oil  and Stop Feeding the Rats

Ealing started offering a free collection of cooking oil from businesses several years ago.  It now seems that residents can recyle their cooking oil too.  You only have to see the photographs of the sewers to realise why the rats like it down there and why this is a good idea!Here is the Council Press Release regarding this."Ealing slick at cooking oil recyclingPublished 7 January 2011An Ealing Council recycling centre is top of the tables for waste cooking oil collection. Greenford Recycling Centre has collected the most cooking oil for recycling in London, and the second highest volume in the country. In the last two years, residents have deposited a massive 6,110 litres at Greenford, and another 1,950 litres at Acton making a total of 8,060 litres.Just one litre of used cooking oil can be converted into a new green fuel called LF100 to produce enough clean electricity to make 240 cups of tea. The total amount collected in Ealing is enough to power eight homes for a year or an energy-saving 20W light bulb for each Ealing resident for five and a half hours*.Residents can dispose of old cooking oil at Ealing Council’s Reuse and Recycling centres in Acton and Greenford. The waste cooking oil is recycled by Living Fuels - part of the British group Renewable Energy Generation - to produce a green fuel to power electricity generators which feed into the National Grid.Pouring cooking oil down the sink is a problem for a number of reasons - it clogs up drains and sewers, is hazardous to wildlife if it is allowed to seep into the water table, and it wastes precious unused energy.Councillor Bassam Mahfouz, cabinet member for Transport and Environment, said: “It’s great news that residents have taken to waste oil recycling with the same enthusiasm that they have shown for all our other recycling services. I would encourage everyone to save used cooking oil left over from cooking, and take it to their nearest recycling centre. Not only will this produce clean and green electricity, it will also save drains from getting blocked.“So, do an extra bit for the environment and make recycling your used cooking oil one of this year's resolutions." Acton Re-use and Recycling Centre in Stirling Road, Greenford Re-use and Recycling Centre in Greenford Road, and Southall Re-use and Recycling Centre in Gordon Road are open Mon-Sun, 8am-5pm (between 1 April-30 September) and 8am-4pm (between 1 October-31 March). Further information on recycling in Ealing is available. * Based on statistics from the Centre for Alternative Technology. "

Philippa Bond ● 5198d11 Comments ● 1937d

Rupa Huq and animal cruelty

Fox-hunting is in the news, apparently.  I don’t know why as the Conservative Party has at last had the humanity to abandon any attempt to re-legalise it. Labour candidate Rupa Huq, however, claims (3.12.19) she has received emails asking her views.  She writes: “I am resolutely AGAINST and oppose all blood sports which I find cruel and barbaric.  Here I am campaigning on the issue with Brian May, Queen guitarist.  This is a piece of retrospective virtue-signalling and a chance to fish out an old photo of herself with a celebrity.But what about the cruel and barbaric practice of halal slaughter? The Labour manifesto states it will ensure policy is informed by the latest scientific evidence on animal sentience.  There is mention of “a review of standards within slaughterhouses.” No mention of the present dispensation in law for religious groups to slaughter without stunning.  Rupa Huq wrote about it (7.1.18).   Let us examine her words.   They reveal her character.  She promotes the practice and defames people who object to it as racists.  She wrote (7.1.18): “Was sent this from as colleague in Oxford. Some mums there are up in arms with a primary school’s decision to serve halal meat only. There are loads of comments up. They are divided between the usual “political correctness gone mad” brigade and those who see these protests as just an excuse for covert racism – I tend towards the latter.”So, she thinks that this group of people – none of whom she knows - are racists.  Upon what basis?  None.  They are racists just because they oppose halal slaughter.  And ALL of them are racist.  Demonising a whole group of people is STEREOTYPING, particularly perverse in Huq’s case because she knows none of them.  “Presumably these parents don’t complain in Indian restaurants where halal meat served?" Why presume that?  If they don’t wish to consume halal meat the logical presumption is that they would. This silly remark is intended to paint the people as islamophobic. “It can be argued that halal and kosher slaughter of animals – a simple slit to the throat by knife is more humane than a long-lingering death by stun gun.”The phrase “a simple slit” betrays Huq’s ignorance. The evidence of the RSPCA is that even a rapid movement with a sharp knife cuts through skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks, and numerous minor nerves, resulting in significant pain and distress before insensibility supervenes, which in the case of a calf can last up to 2 minutes. .As to her “long lingering death by stun gun”. What is her scientific evidence to support that argument?   She has none.  Evidence is to the contrary. The proposition is inherently ridiculous.  She goes on:“Both McDonalds in Southall and Subway sandwich bar on Kingston University campus only serve halal meat as (i) there is a demand from customers and (ii) people of other religions or none are not forbidden from eating it." They are not “forbidden”, but they choose not to eat halal meat because of the pain it has inflicted on animals.  It is their right to do that and to say what they say according to their moral beliefs which are just as valid as her religious beliefs.    They are forbidden by their own conscience and sense of human decency in not wishing to consume the product of animal cruelty.  Huq, in her intolerance of other people’s beliefs, brands them as racists. According to Huq, anyone who objects to halal slaughter is guilty of “covert racism”. That must include the  RSPCA.  And, of course, they must be guilty of Islamophobia by expressing an opinion critical of the beliefs and practices of Islam.   As to a university campus, A student at Lancaster University was banned from lectures after he said he wouldn’t eat a Subway or a KFC because they used halal meat. “I’m completely against ritual slaughter - it causes the animal to suffer. I said this is showing the impact of the UK becoming Islamified.”  Fellow students complained.  He was suspended unless he took part in a ‘diversity training course’.  Every university, I suspect, has a pack of alt-left activists who bully in order to suppress a right to free speech. I wonder, if such an incident had arisen in Kingston University, what the opinion of member of staff Rupa Huq would have been?  She would have “tended” to call him a racist.Huq cares for the animals when there is a political point to be made, not as a matter of principle.  She reveals herself in her short message to be intolerant and disrespectful of other people’s beliefs and casually accuses them of racism, a criminal offence. 

Andrew Farmer ● 1968d12 Comments ● 1964d

CIC Forces Closure of Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

The following was posted by Bela Cunha on the Chiswick forum: Gunnersbury Park Bowling Club was founded in 1931. When the Community (now, there's a misnomer!) Interest Company took over the running of the Park, bowls club members were assured that CIC valued bowling, wished to see it continue and wanted to discuss ways of increasing the general public's use of the green. What were those assurances worth? Or Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, with its laudable aims of promoting both, but, in reality, nothing but hot air? Now the sports hall is running massively late and needs more money (were late-finishing penalties not included in the building contract?) and CIC have decided to kick out the bowls club to replace it with a secret sporting activity to produce revenue. CIC refuse to reveal what the secret activity is or explain why there is such a need for secrecy. The bowls club did not cost the councils a penny; members looked after everything, including the upkeep of the green. Yet we are the sacrificial lamb, in another example of CIC short-sighted short-termism. They claim our site is just right for the secret activity, but is it really believable that, had there been any goodwill or readiness to look for another alternative, there is nowhere else in the park that could accommodate it? When/if this venture fails to generate the required revenue and packs up and leaves the park, the bowling green cannot be restored. Bowling was the one activity in the park for the older members of the community; the bowling club was for many years the place where we stayed active, socialised with friends and held competitions with other local clubs. All that has been disregarded and summarily thrown out by the autocratic CIC - judge and jury, unaccountable to the community whose interests it's meant to safeguard, not subject to oversight and strangers to transparency.

Gordon Southwell ● 1977d12 Comments ● 1965d

RUPA HUQ UNFIT FOR PUBLIC OFFICE

Unfit for office for many reasons.When asked to condemn a landlord who had tenants living in filth and fire-hazard for years and the council officer who perversely reappointed him as fit to preside over an HMO, Rupa Huq failed to respond.  She put protecting the reputation of the local Labour council above care for the safety of her constituents.She has failed to respond to representations from constituents whose lives are being made a misery by a gang of Ukrainians who conduct a trading activity outside their homes and threaten and attack residents, all this occurring due to the negligence of Ealing Council. She defended the anti-semitic posts of Naz Shah.   All she could say in her own defence was that she was naïve.  She is over forty and supposedly well-educated. I want something better than “naïve” for my MP, especially when it leads to defending anti-semitic obscenities such as saying “everything Hitler did was legal” and suggesting the SOLUTION (sinister word) for the Israel/Palestinian problem was relocating Israel in the USA.    When asked to condemn Shah’s post and condemn her for anti-semitism, she ignored the correspondence.  She failed to condemn. She condoned.  She is as bad as Shah. When asked to condemn the violent language of Jess Phillips, who wrote she would knife Jeremy Corbyn “in the front, not the back” if it looked like he was damaging the party’s chances of electoral success, she failed to respond to the correspondence.  She failed to condemn the words.  She condoned them.  She is as bad as Phillips.    When asked to condemn Shah, who shared a tweet saying child abuse victims “should keep their mouths shut” for the sake of Diversity and next posted a tribute to Winnie Mandela with a “meme”  which promoted murdering people by putting a tyre round their necks and burning them to death, she failed to respond to the correspondence.  She failed to condemn the words.  She condoned them.  She is as bad as Shah.  She defended the use of halal slaughter, condemned by the RSPCA, and did so in total ignorance of scientific evidence.  She condemned as racists a group of people of whom she knew nothing for no other reason than that they opposed it according to their own moral values. She was intolerant of other people’s beliefs.  The accusation was unfounded and defamatory. She was accused of anti-semitic behaviour by staff. The supposed investigation was held in secret. When asked for a transcript of the proceedings, her representative made the idiotic excuse that it could not be released because it would undermine the independence of the investigation.  How could a report of an investigation affect its independence once it has been concluded!  She also misrepresented the verdict of “insufficient evidence” and declared Huq had been completely exonerated.   A vote for Huq is a vote for tolerance of anti-semitic hate-speech and violent language by MPs and unfounded accusations against people who happen to disagree with Islamic practices.  It is a vote for indifference to the conditions in which people in HMOs are obliged to live.  And, if you have hope that Labour Party concern for the humane treatment of animals will lead to banning unstunned slaughter, I think you know how Huq would vote.  Carry on slitting the throats of the lambs of God!  When you vote, vote for whomsoever you judge best placed to rid us of the shame of having Huq as our MP.

Andrew Farmer ● 1967d1 Comments ● 1966d

CHEAP GOT CHEAPER

Cheap got cheaper.  I pointed out how cheap it was of Rupa Huq to make political capital out of the stabbing that occurred near me home.  It was all to do with “the cuts”.  Here we go again.  Two people murdered by a moslem terrorist.  First Khan, the mayor not the moslem terrorist, tells us how wonderful Diversity is.  Some people hate it, he said. Little wonder when it yields an individual such as Kahn. Then we have Labour laying the blame for his release and so the murders on cuts in the funding of prisons and the probation service.   The blame for the incident was Kahn.  He was evil.   Not a word one hears too often today.  Instead we have excuses.   In this case in the Guardian from Kahn’s lawyer.   “He requested intervention by a deradicaliser when he was in prison, Sharif said”.Might that have been because he wanted to look good as he was intending to appeal? “The only option was the probation service ….  Probation do a good job with conventional offenders but they can’t deal with ideological offenders.”They can deal with ALL inmates according the obligation of their role,  which is not to discuss interpretations of religions.   For that, inmates have representatives of various religions available.    I cannot believe Kahn did not have access to an Imam during his years of imprisonment.  If he did, then the statement that “the only option was the probation service” is a false statement.His lawyer claims he “accepted his understanding of Islam was deficient” but “extremists may have targeted him to be regroomed after release from jail”. It’s those groomers again, never the responsibility of the individual.And what was his understanding of Islam?  And what is the proper understanding of Islam, according to its Scholars?  When they make up their minds, they will be able to tell us.   For now, the politically convenient understanding is that it the religion of peace.  

Andrew Farmer ● 1975d0 Comments ● 1975d

Is Ealing Central and Acton a safe seat for Labour?

I've had a number of conversations in the area about what seems likely to be a general election in the near future. Nearly everybody I have spoken to voted Labour in the last election, these included not just life-long Labour party supporters but dyed in the wool Tories and floating voters.The reasons were various but boiled down to three main factors with Brexit being the main one obviously. The other factors most often mentioned were Theresa May's social care plans and the belief that there was zero chance of Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister.Given that Rupa Huq is widely acknowledged to be a good constituency MP and she won a massive majority last time out it may seem preposterous to think in terms of her not winning at the next vote. However, it shouldn't be forgotten that she previously held the seat with a tiny majority and it was initially expected that she might not win.My unrepresentative sample suggests that circumstances this time will deprive her of some of the votes she had before. Jeremy Corbyn being prime minister is a much more likely scenario which means that disaffected Tories and many habitual Labour voters are not going to back her. Also her huge majority was in large part a protest vote against Brexit. Although her personal record on the subject is impeccable, her party's is not and many people wanting to signal support for remaining in the EU are going to vote Lib Dem. Plus this time the Greens will probably stand losing her more votes.Whether or not these changes are enough to put the seat at risk is debatable but Rupa probably needs to brace herself for a much reduced majority. It will be interesting to see the resources the Tories committ to the constituency because they will probably need a few surprise results to form a government and no doubt Dominic Cummings is looking very closely at all the data.

Andy Jones ● 2054d46 Comments ● 1978d

Equality Trust Pledge - Where are the Torys?

The Equality Trust was founded in 2009 to examine the effects of inequality on society and, following the significant findings, is now funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Great inequality is the scourge of modern societies. The Equality Trust has provided the evidence on each of eleven different health and social problems: physical health, mental health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community life, violence, teenage births, and child well-being. For all eleven of these health and social problems, outcomes are very substantially worse in more unequal societies. They have also checked the relationships wherever possible in two independent test beds: internationally among the rich countries, and then again among the 50 states of the USA. In almost every case they have found the same tendency for outcomes to be much worse in more unequal societies in both settings.During this election period the Trust has asked parliamentary and local council candidates to show they're committed to reducing income inequality by signing the following statement:"Compelling new evidence presented by The Equality Trust shows that more equal societies - those with a narrower gap between rich and poor – are more cohesive, healthier, suffer fewer social problems and are more environmentally sustainable. In view of these findings I am committed to making the UK a more equal society as the most effective means of building a better society. I will therefore actively support the case for policies designed to narrow the gap between rich and poor; and engage with the debate on which measures should be implemented to achieve that aim."The 290 pledges given so far (Sat 10th) give us an interesting picture. The percentages by party I have discovered are: Green Party: 36%Liberal Democrats: 32%Labour: 21%Conservative: 7%Other: 4%Readers can draw their own conclusions from this and some candidates may say that they were unaware of the pledge which is in any case telling.The question for me is if so few conservatives are unaware or unwilling to make this pledge how can the Tory’s “Big Society” idea really be the panacea that David 's Cameron talks about?However I do welcome the upper limit for the public sector announced by the Tory at 20 times that of the lowest paid. However, if this is to have any real impact (20 times has little impact) it should be set at 10 times as set by the Greens for both the private and public sectors. To my mind the “Big Society” can only succeed without the “Great Inequality”.http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/ C BRYANhttp://conradbryan.blogspot.com/

Conrad Bryan ● 5483d27 Comments ● 1981d

Does Rupa Huq Car?

Dear Rupa Huq, Do you care? I wrote to you some time ago about a neighbourhood problem:  a landlord with an appalling record and a council officer who, knowing his record, licensed him as a fit and proper person to have control of an HMO.   I received an automated respond but nothing more.  I felt that, because there was criticism of the Labour Local Authority in my email, you were putting your party before the safety of the lives of your constituents.Here is a chance to redeem yourself.  I am putting the matter to you again. THE BAD LANDLORD:  ThamesHouse Property Ltd.  For several years the landlord had been using his property (354-6 Uxbridge Road) as an HMO without planning consent.   The tenants were housed in damp rooms with cracked, mouldy walls; the smoke-alarm was taped over; the fire escape route was blocked and there were no proper fire-doors.   THE COUNCIL OFFICER Mark Wiltshire Wilshire knew all this.  He also knew the tenants were causing neighbourhood nuisance.  He was supplied with evidence that the landlord had admitted it but was doing nothing about it.  He had over thirty statements from neighbours setting out the antisocial behaviour they were suffering from the tenants: drunken noise within the building and a squalid business they were operating in the street outside, polluting the air with engines left running, fouling the road with empty food cartons and intimating passers-by. Wiltshire licensed this landlord as a fit and proper person to have control of large-scale HMO. As a candidate for the social-justice Labour Party that claims to care for “generation rent”, will you condemn this landlord, whose record was of a merchant in filth and fire-hazard, as unfit to have control of a large-scale HMO and unwelcome in our Borough and will you condemn the council officer, who ignored his record and who know rejoices in the title Director of Safer Communities, as unit to hold office? And BEFORE the election would be nice, JUST TO SHOW THAT YOU CARE.I am copying this to the local Labour Party as I am not clear whether you are receiving emails via Westminster. Andrew Farmer

Andrew Farmer ● 1997d32 Comments ● 1985d

October smiles

If I had a dollar for every girl that found me unattractive, they'deventually find me attractive. I find it ironic that the colors red, white, and blue stand forfreedom, until they're flashing behind you. Today a man knocked on my door and asked for a small donation towardsthe local swimming pool, so I gave him a glass of water. I changed my password to "incorrect" so whenever I forget it thecomputer will say, "Your password is incorrect." Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. I'm great at multi-tasking--I can waste time, be unproductive, andprocrastinate all at once. If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame. Never tell your problems to anyone, because 20 percent don't care andthe other 80 percent are glad you have them. Doesn't expecting the unexpected mean that the unexpected is actually expected? Take my advice — I'm not using it. My wife and I were happy for twenty years; then we met. I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves soundperspicacious. Hospitality is the art of making guests feel like they're at home whenyou wish they were. Television may insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like acomputer. I bought a vacuum cleaner six months ago and so far all it's beendoing is gathering dust. Every time someone comes up with a foolproof solution, along comes amore-talented fool. I'll bet you $4,567 you can't guess how much I owe my bookie. Behind every great man is a woman rolling her eyes. If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have troubleputting on your pants. A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Ever stop to think and forget to start again? When I married Mr. Right, I had no idea his first name was Always. My wife got 8 out 10 on her driver's test--the other two guys managedto jump out of her way. There may be no excuse for laziness, but I'm still looking. Women spend more time wondering what men are thinking than men spend thinking. Give me ambiguity or give me something else. He who laughs last thinks slowest. Is it wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly? Women sometimes make fools of men, but most guys are the do-it-yourself type. I was going to give him a nasty look, but he already had one. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine. The grass may be greener on the other side but at least you don't haveto mow it. I like long walks, especially when they're taken by people who annoy me. I was going to wear my camouflage shirt today, but I couldn't find it. If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you. Sometimes I wake up grumpy; other times I let her sleep. If tomatoes are technically a fruit, is ketchup a smoothie? Money is the root of all wealth. No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be stationery. I asked the person if it was apathy or a lack of empathy, he said "I don't know and I don't care"

Graham Weeks ● 2008d0 Comments ● 2008d

Canning Town - the End for Extinction Rebellion

It's hard to decide what to make of the events at Canning Town train station. Overall I suppose it was a positive given the number of people who were prepared to stand between an angry mob and those who were determined to make their life more difficult. The incident perhaps shows the flaw in the idea of Extinction Rebellion. I am completely onboard with the idea that something needs to be urgently done on climate change and am comfortable with the idea that at times that might mean protest that skirts legality when there is no viable effective alternative. The problem that is developing is that many members of Extinction Rebellion have reached the conclusion that the strength and importance of their argument means that any protest they make must by definition be right. Causing inconvenience and financial loss to people who in many cases will be on much lower incomes than them is a necessary part of making their point they will claim. The idea of disrupting public transport is self-evidently daft but because Extinction Rebellion is against any sort of proper organisational structure there isn't really any way to stop people associated with the campaign from holding counter-active protests. This means that there probably will be more like the Canning Town incident in which the protestors are more interested in attention seeking than making a coherent point and this is what the media will focus on. Every time this happens more people will write Extinction Rebellion off as a group of deliberately annoying hippies.

Dennis O'Shea ● 2020d13 Comments ● 2016d

Ground Penetrating Radar Scan.

I am a True Crime Writer and Television Investigative Consultant. I have for the past 14 years been researching the horrendous crimes committed by Abertillery-born Harold Jones. In 1921, Jones then aged 15 murdered 2 Abertillery, Wales schoolgirls, Freda Burnell aged 8 and 11 year-old Florence Little. After being released from prison in 1941 Jones served 5 years in the army before settling in Fulham, Putney and finally Hammersmith where he died in 1971. Jones used a number of names during his time in London - first Harold Jones, then Harry Stevens and finally Harry Jones. Research has led myself and many criminal experts to believe that Jones went on to become the serial killer known as the Hammersmith Nudes' Killer (1959-1965.) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/488557/is-this-man-the-real-jack-the-stripper/These 8 unsolved killings have over the past 11 years been given much media attention. In 2011 a one hour drama documentary titled Fred Dinenage Murder Casebook - Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer has been shown repeatedly on various satellite Channels worldwide. (Google Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer.) This led to a major 90 minute national television documentary which was shown in January and February 2019. (Google Dark Son - The Hunt For A Serial Killer to see trailers.) In the early 1960's Jones using the name Harry Stevens  had lived in Fulham, 2 streets away from 3rd nudes's victim Hannah Tailford. In 1964 and 1965 whilst living in Putney under the name Harry Stevens, he was AT THE SAME TIME occupying a rented house in Hammersmith using the name Harry Jones. This was 2 streets away from 7th nudes victim Frances Brown and 8th nudes' victim Bridget O'Hara. It is my belief that there may be trophies buried in the garden at Hammersmith and the owner has now given me permission to use ground-penetrating radar to detect any such evidence.I am trying to locate someone in the film or media industry or anyone else who would be willing to cover the cost of the scan and record the garden being scanned. (Approximately 70 square metres.)On top of the circumstantial evidence regarding Jones living just 2 streets away from 3 of the murder victims below are a few more startling links.(1) Jones' own daughter has indicated that her father would leave her and her mother at home at the times of the killings and book into Rowton House, a doss house in Hammersmith whenever her parents would have a row. The daughter stated that she now believes her father would do this in fear that he may kill his wife in temper. Jones' own son-in-law stated that "There's no smoke without fire is there?"(2) Bridget O'Hara, the 8th victim was last seen leaving a pub near Rowton House on 11 January 1975 - Jones' birthday.(3) The person believed to be the killer had in 1964 shown one woman (a prostitute) a Metropolitan Police warrant card after she had got into his car. She stated that she felt very uncomfortable and made an excuse to get out of the vehicle. The driver gave her some cash before she got out. I believe the person was Harold Jones who was using the warrant card that had belonged to John Widdows, Jones father-in-law who had died just 2-3 years earlier. Widdows was a former London Metropolitan Police officer. Jones daughter stated that she still possessed her grandfather's retirement clock and Widdows may have possibly kept his warrant card when he retired.(4) At least 4 of the 8 murder victims were stored in a disused electricity sub-station on the Heron Trading Estate in East Acton. This was about 4 miles from Jones' rented property in Hammersmith. Jones daughter claims that her father worked in ACTON at the time of the murders but couldn't or wouldn't reveal which business premises he had worked at.(5) Jones left prison in 1941 after refusing treatment or discussing his crimes with the relevant authorities. The prison authorities noted that Jones, right to the day he was released showed no remorse for his crimes in Wales. Just shortly before his release the prison governor stated: "Sad as it seems, I can see no hopeful prospects for Jones in the future." The prison chaplain described Jones as "a no hoper." And then Jones was released onto an unsuspecting public possibly in the hope he would get killed in Libya where he served 5 years in the army.I am in contact with relatives of 6 of the 8 murder victims and they all (especially adult children of these women) are keen to know the identity of the killer in their lifetime. I am now 67 years old and I would like to know for sure the killer's identify in my lifetime.If anyone would like to come on board with this matter or have any practical suggestions I can be contacted at n.milkin@sky.com or 07989555376. Regards. Neil Milkins.

Neil Milkins ● 2037d2 Comments ● 2037d

The Rising Tide of Death on Our Streets

If you talk to anyone with day to day experience of dealing with young people in London today they will all tell you the same thing. The chances of a youth becoming involved in violent crime rises massively if there is no father figure in the household. No matter how loving and supportive a single mother is, she often can't impose the critical red lines on behaviour that enable boys to develop self-control. I'm not speaking with reference to the events last night in Ealing because we don't know any details. Also there are no studies to confirm what the professionals say because these days academic institutions shy away from research which is likely to generate controversy. However, we do know that there is a significant rise in fatherless boys occurring at the moment and this is coinciding with a sharp rise in knife crime. Unfortunately this is just the start of the rise and the problem is set to get worse if unchecked. The other issue is that the internet now allows rival gangs to communicate with each other and arrange confrontations — technology has made gang warfare more efficient. You can't put this genie back in the bottle. It also means that more police won't necessarily solve the problem. If fights can be arranged on encyrpted software even the best resourced force can't do anything about it. Tougher sentences are also demonstrably not going to work. We already lock up more people than any other country in western Europe and custodial sentences for minor offences just turns petty criminals into hardened ones. Higher tariffs for carrying knives has just resulted in gangs getting minors to bring knives to fights. The answer we may now have to look at is the fostering and adoption system. At the moment the presumption is in favour of the natural mother but huge resources will be ploughed into supporting her even though the outcome for the child is likely to be bad. If the bar was raised for when a mother would receive this support and more children were put up for adoption at an early stage we would see a reduction in crime in 15 years time.

Gordon Southwell ● 2042d12 Comments ● 2037d

Boris's Dilemma

After today's events I'm sure most people are as confused an uncertain about what is going on in UK politics as I am. Things are happening at such a pace it is difficult to keep track.  To make sense of it I thought it might be an idea to step back from the febrile atmosphere of news coverage of events and try and simplify what is going on. To start this it is probably best to accept from the outset that Boris Johnson has no guiding principles. That is meant as an observation rather than a criticism. Before opting to support Leave he laid out both sides of the argument and says he agonised over which to choose. That wasn't because he would have been persuaded by the strongest argument, he wanted to pick which would be best for his career. Boris has cultivated the party membership since he started in politics and, far more than any other Conservative politician has recognised that this is where true power lies within the party. Once he became leader it is now almost impossible to remove him as he will always have the backing of the membership. Getting close to the party rank and file has also made him well aware of their views and he was quick to realise they were unremittingly Eurosceptic. That they generally leaned that way was well known but he picked up quickly that since the referendum they had become obsessed with the issue beyond any other to the point that they would willingly compromise the economy or the Union to get Brexit. This meant that he knew any chance of him not becoming leader would be eliminated by him being the most unreservedly pro-Brexit candidate for leader. Right from the start he laid out his stall and effectively eliminated Dominic Raab who had previously outdone him for unbending Euroscepticism. However, this meant that he need to make pledges such as an unbreakable commitment to leave on 31 October. Having become leader he had to face the problem of his inadequate majority in the House which meant that any meaningful legislative programme was impractical even without Brexit. The normal solution would have been to call a general election but he faced the problem of another inadequate majority — that by which he holds Uxbridge and Hillingdon. If the Brexit party actively contests the seat and the Remain parties form an effective alliance he would probably lose. Therefore he needs to fight the election with some sort of pact with the Brexit party in place. The problem is that they are unlikely to stand aside unless he commits to a very hard Brexit as a campaign platform which his MPs may be unwilling to support. Assuming there is an election on 14 October cabinet would probably want him to say they would go for a negotiated deal without the backstop which the Brexit party say is not Brexit. This probably explains his confused and fairly pointless statement today. It would appear that the legislative challenge to 'no deal' Brexit is likely to work otherwise he wouldn't be threatening MPs with a loss of the whip. He now faces the choice of accepting an extension and missing the 31 October deadline or calling an election but he can't put no deal back on the table as a policy stance. However, an election would be an incredible roll of the dice. There are so many variables but the most likely outcome at this stage seems to be a Remain coalition with some chance that Boris may lose his seat. Of course a lot could happen in the meantime but Boris is essentially saddled with a policy stance that might appeal to his party's members but is unpalatable to the broader electorate. He probably recognises the chance of losing is high. On the other hand toughing it out as PM and reneging on his commitment to leave by 31 October even under duress may end his political career. Even he would have to consider resignation.  Neither of theses choices are particularly palatable for him but at least he has a dog now to give him some comfort.



Gordon Southwell ● 2065d45 Comments ● 2043d

Object by Friday 13th if you don't want 47 planes per Hour @ 2,000 feet flying directly over you.

If you haven’t already responded to Heathrow’s Consultation on a Third Runway, please send a short email message by this Friday 13 September 2019 to feedback@heathrowconsultation.com from your home postal address, saying for example a simple  “I am opposed to the expansion of Heathrow Airport “And adding one or more of the following that affect you:-It would bring many more planes over where I liveIt would bring many more planes over where I workThere would be aircraft noise overhead all the time, every dayI would be woken every morning by aircraft noise from 6amIt would cause increased pollution over the London areaThe air quality where I and my family live would be reduced from its present already poor levelI have asthma and the increased pollution caused by more aircraft would make it worseIt would cause the destruction of Harmondsworth and Longford villagesOver 750 homes would have to be demolished, and many more homes would become uninhabitable because of the noise and pollutionIt will alter the character of the whole of West London when the airport takes over all the land it says it needs for the third runway and associated airport useI will not be able to get on to the already overcrowded Piccadilly Line trains for my commute to and from workAny other comments you may wish to raise yourself and, of course, use your own wording and circumstances.And not to mention of course the drastic devaluation of your home if you're lucky enough to own one, after working hard all your life.Please note that The Department for Transport will take account of the actual number of responses, so it is important that we should all send our own response.   If you have neighbours or friends who share the same concerns, do please pass this message on to them ASAP..And then pat yourself on the back for getting off your backside and actually doing something - Strength In Numbers and all that folks!     :-)

Rosco White ● 2056d2 Comments ● 2055d

47 Planes a minute overhead, at 2,000 feet in Ealing/Acton! - Object NOW before 13 Sept:-

If you haven’t already responded to Heathrow’s Consultation on a Third Runway, please send a short email message by Friday 13 September 2019 to feedback@heathrowconsultation.com from your home postal address, saying for example a simple  “I am opposed to the expansion of Heathrow Airport “ And adding one or more of the following that affect you:-It would bring many more planes over where I liveIt would bring many more planes over where I workThere would be aircraft noise overhead all the time, every dayI would be woken every morning by aircraft noise from 6amIt would cause increased pollution over the London areaThe air quality where I and my family live would be reduced from its present already poor levelI have asthma and the increased pollution caused by more aircraft would make it worseIt would cause the destruction of Harmondsworth and Longford villagesOver 750 homes would have to be demolished, and many more homes would become uninhabitable because of the noise and pollutionIt will alter the character of the whole of West London when the airport takes over all the land it says it needs for the third runway and associated airport use I will not be able to get on to the already overcrowded Piccadilly Line trains for my commute to and from workAny other comments you may wish to raise yourself and, of course, use your own wording and circumstances.And not to mention of course the drastic devaluation of your home if you're lucky enough to own one, after working hard all your life.Please note that The Department for Transport will take account of the actual number of responses, so it is important that we should all send our own response.   If you have neighbours or friends who share the same concerns, do please pass this message on to them ASAP..And then pat yourself on the back for getting off your backside and actually doing something - Strength In Numbers folks!     :-)

Rosco White ● 2063d4 Comments ● 2063d

Volunteer at the Ealing Half Marathon 2019

Ealing Half Marathon still needs about 100 volunteers for this years event. You don’t have to be a runner to enjoy Ealing’s biggest event of the year. Last year, hundreds of volunteers got involved and had a great time making Ealing’s Half Marathon such a wonderful success for the runners and spectators alike resulting in the event winning the accolade of the Number One Best Half Marathon 2014, 2015 & 2016 at The Running Awards.This year we’ll be putting together an even bigger volunteer team of 700, looking after the race village in Lammas Park, and out on the roads of Ealing guiding the runners and helping local residents. It’s a fun & rewarding experience for all and we’d love you to get involved! You will need to be able to give between 4 to 6 hours on the day depending on where you are volunteering. The required start time for most volunteer areas will be 07:30am to allow for all the logistics on the day.As a thank you for creating such a great race we’ll provide you with a free breakfast roll, staff t-shirt and memento medal of the day for you to keep plus a FREE race place for 2020.There are a large number of roles available on race-day:Team LeadersTraffic co-ordinatorsRace marshalsWater station teamsBaggage & race village co-ordinatorsVolunteering is a great opportunity to feel part of the event and meet new like-minded people.You register at www.ealinghalfmarathon.com/volunteer

Sandra Courtney ● 2083d0 Comments ● 2083d

Age does weary us.

The young staff manning the recent Heathrow Airport Expansion Display on Ealing Common were surprised that although the Elizabeth Line had step free access to the trains the stations' forecourts at Ealing Broadway and West Ealing had no facility to pick-up and drop-off the disabled, those with luggage, pushchairs and the walking elderly. This is contrary to the British Standard for the design for station forecourts for access for the disabled.Only two Tube stations have step-free access in Ealing. One Acton town has a lift that cannot be used to drop off passengers illegally because LBE have a CCTV camera operating there. This generated fines for drivers who try to drop off passengers who have difficulty with stairs.Ealing's transport portfolio holder and senior officer assume that they might never get old like Peter Pan and need some help to be able to access our trains. I have written to Rt Hon Nusrat Ghani MP Accessibility Minister just  10 days ago complaining of this stupidity. The other body who might help are Transport for London who have a party in Dean Gardens this Saturday 20th July. The focus of this is to spend large amounts of dosh to improve the park but wasn't large amounts spent on it recently when it was out of action for 9 months. Perhaps they are Peter Pan-like too. Certainly they are like Nero hoping to feed cyclists to lorries and buses down the Uxbridge Road; another numptie idea.And all this electronic parking stuff ..all designed for the young. Now with libraries under threatPerhaps now is the time to up sticks and go to Torquay or Eastbourne. Clearly we aren't wanted in Ealing.

Arthur Breens ● 2110d47 Comments ● 2083d

Read with children!

Do you remember a character from a childhood book as fondly as an old friend?If you do, you’ll know the magic of being able to slip into another world as and when you need to, or how books can make your world a bigger, brighter place.For bookworms especially, it’s hard to believe that anyone could see reading as anything other than empowering, or even just a pleasure. For the third of children from disadvantaged areas who leave primary school without being able to read well, often it’s nothing but a chore.That’s why we like to turn up on the doorstep, with a backpack of books, two little stools, and a pair of volunteers who know that words take you places. Every week, come rain or shine, our volunteers bring the magic of reading directly into families’ homes every week, in low-income areas across London.Doorstep Library volunteers don’t just read stories; they do the silly voices, handpick the books, and give special recommendations. By making it fun first, we get to watch children transform into budding readers. We love when parents get stuck in with the sessions too and encourage them to get involved in their children’s education.Sometimes though, we’re just there to give a bit of extra support, whether we’re passing on info about a family activity, lending an ear, or even just being a friendly face. Then, before we go, we leave behind a selection of books for each child to borrow for the week.If this sounds like the role for you, these are the basics. We run projects on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday afternoons in estates across Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lambeth.In Hammersmith and Fulham, Monday and Tuesday projects start at 3.45pm and finish at 6.30pm, and Thursday projects start at 4.30pm and finishing at 7.00pm.If you'd like to know more contact Daniela Cardoso at volunteer@doorsteplibrary.org.uk

Daniela Cardoso ● 2104d16 Comments ● 2084d

ERECTILE DEVELOPMENTS COURTESY OF AN EALING COUNCIL CLIQUE

It seems that the few at the top of Ealing Council are intent on imposing on the many their vision of urbanizing "the queen of the suburbs", Ealing. his involves imposing high level erectile developments (by that I mean buildings, not the other kind) that would surely result in dysfunctional communities. The ruling Labour Party on Ealing Council has degenerated, posing as caring, but they are really concerned about total control and possession. The Council clique that are in control are the disingenuous few imposing this urbanizing vision on the many, pretending to care, but being officious and narcisstic at the expense of the many. Power corrupts.I write this because I have written to the Council, concerning two proposed erections in the vicinity of West Ealing Station. Below is the text of my email letter I sent to Council Leader Julian Bell and his colleague Peter Mason, the Council Lead on planning. Others were copied in, including local MPs, the local GLA member and community groups such as the Stop the Towers campaign group.HASTINGS ROAD AND MANOR ROAD DEVELOPMENTSAs you may know there are proposals to erect two high rise complexes. This includes one complex with a 25 storey block on the corner of Hastings Road and Drayton Green Road (proposed by A2Dominion) and another 26 storey complex on the corner of Manor Road with Drayton Green Road where Argyle Road begins (proposed by Southern Grove...). This site is known as 55west. They are diagonally opposite each other across the strategic railway line/CrossRail route with West Ealing station separating them.I write to you both in order to object to these developments. The Fire Brigade would have difficulty in fighting/extinguishing a fire at such high level developments. These proposed blocks are a fire liability, especially next to the CrossRail route.The existing Victorian and Edwardian architecture of the area should not be further compromised by a so-called contemporary twist of monolithic utilitarian Soviet Socialist style architecture. That already exists in the form of Sinclair and Dominion Houses, and Luminous City diagonally opposite it, across the rail line. The proposed architectural aesthetics are poor.There is a shortage of family housing, yet A2Dominion's proposal only has seven 3 bedroom homes (out of 183 flats), and the 55west site proposed development only has eight 3 bedroom homes (out of 150 flats). These overbearing and over dense fire liability tower blocks with little rabbit hutch flats would also seem to be there as a kind of “Council Tax yield farm” for privileged Council management nomenklatura. Will these proposals actually address the concerns of the homeless, including families within the L.B. of Ealing and reduce it's waiting list?As far as access and aesthetics are concerned, could not something more in keeping with the area be proposed? As an example, on Hastings Road, by the sharp bend on that road there is a "post war infill" block of flats - Hastings House, 42 flats on three storeys. It is certainly less of a fire hazard and is more accessible than the proposals from A2Dominion and Southern Grove. Lower rise and less dense housing developments would almost certainly be better appreciated by homeless families and their would be  neighbours. It would also reduce concerns about overlooking. These proposed erections would not address problems of car use. It would simply "kick the can down the road".It seems that the development proposals are put forward by people who are just blinkered by money and meeting targets for their own supposedly virtuous egos, like some officious status and power hungry driven Komissar in the Soviet Socialist empire of Hitler's one time mass murdering ally in the Kremlin.These proposed erections will surely set out a further precedent for the "slow rape" of "the Queen of the Suburbs", Ealing. It seems L.B. of Ealing Planning Department is fond of doing this. They have already inflicted this around North Acton/Gypsy Corner. They seem fond of using Ealing Borough residents' tax money to destroy/inflict environmental vandalism on the people of Ealing Borough.(END)THE COUNCIL SPENT 18 MONTHS IN SECRET PREPARING THESE PLANS, WITHOUT "CONSULTING" LOCAL EALING RESIDENTS. WHEN THE PLANS BECAME "RIPE" THEY "EXCRETED" THE PLANS OVER EALING RESIDENTS AS A "FAIT ACOMPLI". POWER REALLY DOES CORRUPT.

Anthony Hawran ● 2128d9 Comments ● 2123d

Should We All Be Praying for Dominic Raab To Be Our Next Prime Minister?

So it is the end of May and now the bun fight starts to be the next Tory leader. My personal preference among all the candidates so far is Rory Stewart as he can grasp detail and complex issues and has been a competent Minister. This can't be said for many other of the names being put in the hat. Failing him, Sajid Javid would be an interesting choice and he would probably be up to the job. The big issue though is how to prevent Boris Johnson winning. He is clearly the favourite among the Tory associations despite the overwhelming evidence that he would be an appalling Prime Minister. They clearly are reckoning that his name recognition would be the best way to block a Jeremy Corbyn election victory but that is a high price to pay. The hope would be that the MPs recognise how bad for the country Johnson would be as PM and refuse to get on his bandwagon. That would mean the two candidates to be put forward would be a hard Brexit one and a soft Brexit one. If Raab is positioned as the no compromise candidate this might take away MP votes from Johnson. The hard Brexit candidate would win the vote of the membership but as long as he is not Boris I think I could live with that. The new leader would then have to deal with the same parliamentary mathematics that stymied Theresa May and it is hard to see how a reduced willingness to compromise is going to lead to a majority in the House for whatever way forward is being proposed.

Gordon Southwell ● 2166d23 Comments ● 2139d

Volunteer! Read with local children

Do you remember a character from a childhood book as fondly as an old friend?If you do, you’ll know the magic of being able to slip into another world as and when you need to, or how books can make your world a bigger, brighter place.For bookworms especially, it’s hard to believe that anyone could see reading as anything other than empowering, or even just a pleasure. For the third of children from disadvantaged areas who leave primary school without being able to read well, often it’s nothing but a chore.That’s why we like to turn up on the doorstep, with a backpack of books, two little stools, and a pair of volunteers who know that words take you places. Every week, come rain or shine, our volunteers bring the magic of reading directly into families’ homes every week, in low-income areas across London.Doorstep Library volunteers don’t just read stories; they do the silly voices, handpick the books, and give special recommendations. By making it fun first, we get to watch children transform into budding readers. We love when parents get stuck in with the sessions too and encourage them to get involved in their children’s education.Sometimes though, we’re just there to give a bit of extra support, whether we’re passing on info about a family activity, lending an ear, or even just being a friendly face. Then, before we go, we leave behind a selection of books for each child to borrow for the week.If this sounds like the role for you, these are the basics. We run projects on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday afternoons in estates across Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lambeth.In Hammersmith and Fulham, we start at 3.45pm and finish at 6.30pm. With some projects starting 4.30pm and finishing at 7.00pm.If you'd like to know more contact Daniela Cardoso at volunteer@doorsteplibrary.org.uk

Daniela Cardoso ● 2146d0 Comments ● 2146d

Danny Baker

I'm a huge fan. He is the one radio broadcaster who can effortlessly fill air time with next to no prepared material. He is an intelligent, well-informed, funny man who manages to bring out the best in guests and people who call into his shows.Sometime back I remember him commenting on the British Gas ads which featured an animated family of chimps talking about their central heating. It caused a stir because there were complaints that it could be offensive to black people. Danny said that it was the complaints themselves that were offensive because why on earth would anyone make a particular association between a chimp and a black person.The fact is that some people do and Danny's tweet was ill-advised. He did the right thing deleted it, apologised unreservedly. I genuinely believe the possible racist connotations hadn't occurred to him when he made the post. Having listened to his shows for well over a decade my view is that he doesn't have a racist bone in his body.He probably is a difficult employee though and very much out of step with the culture at the BBC at the moment. He has made no secret of his dislike of management and they have sidelined him a number of times in the past but ultimately had to bring him back because of falling listener numbers. For many other presenters this Twitter storm would have meant a slap on the wrist but Danny's error has given them the chance to do what they have been wanting to do for some time. The BBC is much diminished by this affair.

Tricia Arbuthnot ● 2180d14 Comments ● 2169d

Is The Idea of a Gender Pay Gap a disaster for women?

At a wedding over the weekend I caught up with two of my college friends who were both working in the field of PR and we got talking about the Gender Pay Gap. They hadn't seen each other of years but they both had almost the same thing to say about the issue. Basically their job has become largely about ensuring the companies they work for are not seen as 'institutionally misogynist.'The challenge is that in both firms the highest paid people will be ones with particular professional qualifications and men make up the larger proportion who have the required skills. They have done everything they can to maximise the number of women recruited including short lists which are always split 50-50. However it is very difficult to recruit proportionally more women. Even though most interviews are carried out by women they tend to chose by qualifications and talent rather than by gender to the point that they select a lower proportion of women than male interviewers. The senior women are more concerned about the effectiveness of the people they work with than the gender balance at the firms. Even so at both firms a woman is likely to be paid more than a man with equivalent experience because of her scarcity value.This puts pressure on HR departments because it makes the gender pay ratio look really bad. You can't affect the numbers at the top end so the only solution is to look at the lower end of the pay scale. This has two impacts - firstly there is an unspoken rule to ensure that as many of the lowest paid jobs at the firms are taken by men. These are roles like cleaners and admin which would previously had been largely filled by women. Secondly they are reducing the proportion of women taken on at graduate recruitment level.The next result of a focus only on the gender pay gap is that women from lower income groups are losing out on much needed jobs and younger graduate women are not getting as many opportunities as they used to. In the longer term this is just going to make the gender pay issue worse.Both of my friends blamed the BBC for the problem saying that they see this issue purely through the prism of the gender pay gap and it has frightened many boards of directors into taking action. However, whether Clare Balding gets paid as well as John Humphries has little relevance for most companies.

Tricia Arbuthnot ● 2204d10 Comments ● 2178d

Dockless bicycles.

Just received the following email.Dear Sir or Madam,The following response has been made to the ePetition titled "Ask the council to, Debate, consult in public and review the dockless bike schemes in Ealing Borough." that you signed:The Council’s policy is to increase the cycling mode share, this has significant air quality and health benefits and is likely to reduce demand for car parking spaces over time. As such, the dockless cycle hire scheme is helping us achieve this policy.  There were over 2,000 rides last week week using dockless cycles and with very few complaints from the public since the scheme was first implemented in September 2017.  The vast majority of bikes are left in reasonable locations for future hire.  Leaving them in multiple places actually increases, not decreases access to a bicycle as claimed. If you do see a bicycle completely blocking the footway, the contact details on the bike will allow you to report it; the operators have a few hours to respond as per our agreement with them and to date they have been reasonably good at doing so and have been generally compliant with both the TfL code of practice and the agreement with the Council. Also, it is incorrect to state that Manchester rejected the scheme.  It was a commercial decision by Mobike to withdraw the service.  The levels of vandalism and theft are significantly lower in Ealing, but there is no cost to the public purse when this does occasionally occur.

Dennis Bailey ● 2218d42 Comments ● 2180d

Volunteer! Read with children

Do you remember a character from a childhood book as fondly as an old friend?If you do, you’ll know the magic of being able to slip into another world as and when you need to, or how books can make your world a bigger, brighter place.For bookworms especially, it’s hard to believe that anyone could see reading as anything other than empowering, or even just a pleasure. For the third of children from disadvantaged areas who leave primary school without being able to read well, often it’s nothing but a chore.That’s why we like to turn up on the doorstep, with a backpack of books, two little stools, and a pair of volunteers who know that words take you places. Every week, come rain or shine, our volunteers bring the magic of reading directly into families’ homes every week, in low-income areas across London.Doorstep Library volunteers don’t just read stories; they do the silly voices, handpick the books, and give special recommendations. By making it fun first, we get to watch children transform into budding readers. We love when parents get stuck in with the sessions too and encourage them to get involved in their children’s education.Sometimes though, we’re just there to give a bit of extra support, whether we’re passing on info about a family activity, lending an ear, or even just being a friendly face. Then, before we go, we leave behind a selection of books for each child to borrow for the week.If this sounds like the role for you, these are the basics. We run projects on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday afternoons in estates across Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lambeth.In Hammersmith and Fulham, we start at 3.45pm and finish at 6.30pm. With some projects starting 4.30pm and finishing at 7.00pm.If you'd like to know more contact Daniela Cardoso at volunteer@doorsteplibrary.org.uk

Daniela Cardoso ● 2188d0 Comments ● 2188d

What has happened to--------

I left Grosvenor Road in 1966, emigrating to Canada at 21years old.I now wonder what became of the White Hart Pub that was just across the Uxbridge Road, and the Wilkinsons that had a greengrocer stall there;and the rest of the Wilkinsons who had stalls at the Hole in the Wall ( which I believe was 'just around the corner' close to Sainsbury's ) and Stalls near Lido Rec/Park; most of whom lived in Shirley Gardens. One I remember well would have been Gloria Wilkinson, who would be a few years younger than I. We never dated, she must have intuitively known I was no catch.I remember reading when this site was Lammas something or the other that the Grosvenor Pub had changed hands and there was something back then on the Ealing Jazz Club that had the Rolling Stones playing Saturday night gigs, but got banned for causing fights  before I went there. I was there when Manfred Mann was the Saturday Night band. They had released one record I believe it was called "I'm Cock a Hoop" or something like it. I was not one for the girls I only really dated 2 girls and of those 2, I would like any information on Jacqueline Wiseman who in 1963 was 14 living on Oaklands Road with her parents and older sister and attending St. Josephs Catholic Grammar School for Girls ( which has also disappeared). The school was run by Nuns some of whom Jacqueline did not get along with and proudly got detention from them for her misbehaviour. Any info on any of the above would be appreciated.

Norman Ronald Mills ● 7070d28 Comments ● 2217d

Council proposes draconian clampdown on car owners

Be very afraid if you need a car to go about your business in Ealing. Latest proposals from the lunatics in the Town Hall will see free stop and shop scrapped, radical increases in CPZ operation (which will affect visitors arriving by car), and a raft of other anti-car ideas. Of course this is all based on the presumption that everyone has a) the time to walk or cycle or take public transport for everything they do away from home; b) everyone lives within easy walking/cycling distance of shops and services and c) nobody needs to take small children and/or heavy shopping anywhere.No doubt it will please the mouth-foamers who view all car use as evil but this is going to kill a lot of small businesses in areas such as Northfields and simply make life impossible for a large number of people. How ironic that this is the same council so committed to easy access to things it wants to shut all the local libraries to which most people.....walk! Morons.You can see the draft proposals at https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=%2fDTc9rYgKb92hbpqUaP%2bqgqnE6W4RcF0RKePDrcv9hWnhQpP5iiVPA%3d%3d&rUzwRPf%2bZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3d%3d=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2fLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3d%3d&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&kCx1AnS9%2fpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2bAJvYtyA%3d%3d=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&FgPlIEJYlotS%2bYGoBi5olA%3d%3d=NHdURQburHA%3d&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3d

Simon Hayes ● 2242d24 Comments ● 2223d

....meanwhile back in the pond

I love stupidity, especially when done in style. It helps me feel i'm not as alone in this world as i thought i once was.I have epilepsy, and like most epileptics i try to do something stupid once in a while. Every now and then i throw common sense out of the window, and perhaps pay the price afterwards.Recently I did the big no no for people like me and decided that i was going to cook myself an awesome meal, one that involved the cooker. Now my awesome meal that i planned involved digging out whatever is in the freezer and dump it in my slow cooker, fry up whatever meat is in the fridge, and throw that on top. Six hours later i have what i refer to as the blob, and my blobs are second to none. I work on the principle of if it don't move it's edible. Now epilepsy and frying pans don't go together, but i got away with that stupidity without a hitch. Now with my awesome blob, rice is called for, and i took my stupidity into the super league. While standing at the cooker boiling a saucepan of rice my epilepsy kicked in. This wasn't my big Frank Bruno seizures that bounces me around the floor ( a generalised seizure), it was one of my absences (a complex partial seizure) that lasts a few seconds. In those few seconds i ended up with with a saucepan of boiling water over my upper body. Once the ambulance arrived i was taken to the awesome Ealing hospital before being transferred to the specialist burns unit at the just as awesome Chelsea and Westminster. They put a figure of 20% of my arms were badly burned.Now i'm the only one to blame, me, no one else, just me for being stupid. During this episode though, i discovered that i'm not the only brain dead moronic fool in Ealing. Not only did i pour boiling water over myself, i also spilt some over the electric timer on the cooker, and that was mains powered, and it blew the circuit breaker in the fuse box. It was then that i found that my entire lighting lighting circuit and my kitchen use the same breaker. I spent twenty minutes fumbling around in total darkness screaming in agony before the thing would reset. I couldn't do thing but scream. The accident also extinguished the gas ring the saucepan was sitting on. Fortunately the safety flame out feature switched it off.Why isn't putting the lighting on its own dedicated fuse a legal requirement?Also, our ambulance service is broken. When i got my lights working again i spent an hour on the phone while someone at the ambulance control room read questions off a computer screen. Trying to answer questions while you are delirious with pain isn't easy, hence the hour long phone call. They refused to advance things at their end to calling an ambulance. It was an hour of answering questions, nothing would budge the person. Ealing hospital, Chelsea and Westminster, and my GP threw a wobbly when they heard of that hour.

Dennis Bailey ● 2243d5 Comments ● 2238d

New ePetition about Dockless bikes (Mobikes etc)

Are you happy with the way these new bikes just landed on our streets? Within weeks they seemed to become randomly distributed around all our local roads left in an amazing variety of inconvenient places – often on their side and some have even been seen in rivers.There’s a new petition about this on the Ealing Council website (there’s a separate one for Hounslow – below)https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx  • These are commercial schemes which should be creating a new, flexible and cheap choice of transport.  • Instead, many users seem to ignore pedestrians who might just want to walk on uncluttered pavements and roads    o With blocked thoroughfares life gets harder.    o Harder for the young    o Harder for Mums with buggies or pushchairs    o Harder for our more elderly neighbours    o Harder even for the users – who wants to get to a bike on the app at the end of a cul de sac?  • Any other type of pavement/road blockage is often regarded as unlawful  • There was recent news came that the bikes had also been used in drug related crime  • If the gps technology is vandalised they can simply go off grid and are left  • If the batteries run down the operators say they can simply go off grid and “disappear”  • It can also be argued the schemes are in breach of the tfl code of practice   • http://content.tfl.gov.uk/dockless-bike-share-code-of-practice.pdf  • There simply seems to be no scheme management at all which is not consistent with what tfl seem to think is appropriateThere are commercial schemes with negligible management or responsibilityThe petition on the council website (https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/E-petitions.aspx) needs 1500 signatures to “win” a council debate OBJECTIVES1. To have a council debate2. For the council to agree to a public consultation (in common with Hounslow council - https://haveyoursay.hounslow.gov.uk/traffic-and-transport/dockless/consultation/intro/ )3. Then for Ealing to agree to a complete scheme review based on the results of the public consultationThe deadline for the 1500 signatures is March 18th

Don Tanswell ● 2255d2 Comments ● 2253d

Dr Rupa Huq Plays the Race Card

Dr Huq reference to the casual racism of the 70s made me laugh as I loved Jim Davidson. What is not funny is that the anti-Catholic atheistic Marxists like Dr Huq and Jon Trickett who was obviously around in the 1970s are holding a Labour Party organised anti-Brexit rally they have deliberately mislabelled an Anti-Racism Rally. On Wednesday 27th February from 7:30pm till 9:30pm in St Mary’s Church Hall, St Mary’s Road, South Ealing. Eve Turner from the Ealing Trades Union Council will introduce Julian Bell then Steve Hadley of the militant Union of Rail, Maritime and Transport Workers then Nahella Ashraf, another Labour Party member in the Stand Up To Racism organisation. In apparently a Christian church hall this group of sad Remoaners are really creating another strand of @Project Fear by creating racial tension.Dr Huq has tried repeatedly tried to get on any media to fill her own pockets by accusing White people of being racists. It is the well tried tool of her mates like Diane Abbott who earns £200,000 a year from TV appearances. I do hope is Balwinder Rana, spokesperson for West London Stand Up To Racism will be available to answer questions. First I want to know about how much taxpayer’s money is being used to pay these anti-Catholic atheistic Marxists and rent the hall. Second since Jon Trickett, Labour MP for Hemsworth  has confessed that racism is in his DNA does he think all White people should be excluded from the Labour Party or just Yorkshiremen?Rupa Huq would not be allowed in the Independent Group or in any group that prevents racism as it is clear her only plan like her other pal Sadiq Khan is to get re-elected by calling all White people racists, imho

Martin Cain ● 2258d20 Comments ● 2253d

Woolworth's Facade

On 20th February Ealing Planning Cttee voted overwhelmingly to approve A2Dominion's development plans for total demolition of the old Woolworth's building in West Ealing. The recent article on Ealing Today incorrectly implies that the preservation of our local heritage, including the 1930's Art Deco Woolworth's facade in the Broadway, was removed from the Neighbourhood Plan for West Ealing Centre.The West Ealing Centre Neighbourhood Plan was drawn up after extensive community consultation over a period of almost 5 years and was formally adopted as an important element of Ealing's Local Statutory Development Plan on 3rd May 2018. The plan accurately reflects the hopes and wishes of local people, was approved at a public meeting of the membership and includes an important policy on preservation and conservation of our heritage.  Demolition of the much loved landmark Woolworth's facade is contrary to the Paragraph 5 of Heritage Policy 14 as well as Paragraphs 6.4 & 6.5. Indeed Paragraph 6 of the agreed plan makes specific provision for the use of Section 106 & CIL funding for the conservation & preservation of the Woolworth's facade. A copy of the adopted Neighbourhood Plan can be found on the council website. It appears that some members of the Ealing's Planning committee were unaware of the recommendations contained within the Neighbourhood Plan or maybe just didn't feel that the views of hundreds, if not thousands, of local people were relevant. How sad that central government is spending large amounts of public money and time encouraging local people to work together as a community only to have their views ignored by our planning system. Preservation of the Woolworth's facade is also supported by a petition of almost 1200 and the planning application for the site itself was vehemently opposed by around 300 people during the consultation stage. Local people believe that the structure could and should be preserved by incorporating it into the design of a new residential block.Is it now time to ask whether our planning system is representative and still fit for purpose?

David Randles ● 2258d9 Comments ● 2253d

The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq M.P. COULD have won the high ground instead of launchinga peer-level spat

The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq M.P. I.M.O. COULD have won the high ground instead of launching a peer-level spat with the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge while contributing towards the education of the U.K. population (if not the World) by educating rather than attacking. One of those wonderful, subtle, letters written on House of Commons headed paper sent to the "Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge" (and released to the press) informing her of her error in the use of the Ebglish language (of course pointing out that the Honourable M.P. for Penistone and Stockbridge could not be presumed to have been intentionally racist)  and explaining how the English language should be used when discussing ethnicity, race and origin). A minimum of a  dozen page guide including a dictionary, lexicon and taxonomy of the appropriate use of the English language (which I as an old git with a traditional education in English usage would find useful, e.g. a formal definition of "B.A.M.E." and its appropriate usage) would serve as a much more effective put down of the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge than an undignified frontal attach over an error of English usage. I am confident that the Honourable Angela Smith, MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge did not INTEND to be racist, and in British law there is the idea that for a crime to be committed there has to be the act as well as the MENS REA or guilty mind which is the intention to commit the crime!The Honourable Dr Rupa Huq, M.P. is an able analyst and meta-analyst of culture, race and ethnicity (as her books and publications show), and if ANYONE can put together a guide to inclusive and appropriate English it would be her absolutely.The idea of Parliament was that the M.P.s would debate and discuss rather than physically fight each other, hence the two opposing being two sword lengths and a hands-breadth apart so that even the sword tips could not engage. However, to allow such discussion we need an appropriate language to debate in where the meaning of issues are discussed rather than the undignified duelling other language errorsOver to you Doctor Huq M.P. educate and discuss or go to war? As long as we are talking we are not fighting!

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2254d0 Comments ● 2254d

Planning Committee February 20th

At Wednesday’s Planning Committee 3,155 units of housing will almost certainly be given planning permission. Of these 106 homes, 3.36% are social housing and 343 homes, 10.88% are at London Affordable rents:Sunrise/Margarine factory, Southall: This application should be turned down as it has no Social Housing. Only 201 of the 2,083 homes are at the London Living rent.Southall The Straight Phase B: This application should be turned down with 897 units of which 146 are “affordable” – 80% market rent and only 106, 12% social housing.96-102 Broadway West Ealing: The development is for 120 units of which only 26, 21% are for London Affordable rent and no social housing. This application falls below the social housing requirement identified in the London plan and should be turned down. Vanguard Site 4 Bilton Road Perivale: 55 units with no social housing and 10 homes at London Living Rents.  This application should be turned down.The borough is well below its social housing target and currently has 11,500 households on its waiting list,  These permissions will do very little to help these people and could be considerably increased within the London plan guidelines.The London Borough of Ealing in January 2018 had 11,498 households on the housing waiting list (FOI request Feb 2018) Ealing Planning Committee needs to be reminded Developers have to develop otherwise they cease to exist, and the borough has the upper hand in giving permissions, why do they not insist on more social and London Living rents, the gift is in their hands.Land is finite and these developments are not a good use of this quickly disappearing resource. What does your Ward Councilor think about these numbers?

Libby Kemp ● 2260d7 Comments ● 2259d

.......meanwhile back in the pond

I live in a council property. It use to be a residential home with a warden, but somewhere in the past the warden got replaced by a common all garden tenant like me. The property, which is a maisonette, has a high upper age limit to qualify for a tenancy. I’ve lived here for about six or seven years. I live on the ground floor.At about the same time that I moved in the lady in the flat above me moved in as a new tenant. Like me she has health issues, she has cancer. Treatment for her cancer involved removing portions of her body, followed by reconstructive surgery to replace the bits the hospital threw away. Unfortunately, the hospital never managed to remove all the cancer, so she had to undergo more surgery and more bits of her body was thrown away. It delayed the reconstructive surgery.Like everyone else she got to work decorating and furnishing the place. When she had finished her home was on par with Buckingham Palace. She threw her entire life’s saving into it. Her idea was that she was going to take early retirement and fight her cancer so she needed the place ready.When we both moved in we noticed the roof guttering was leaking. We both reported it. Nothing was done. We reported it again, and again nothing was done. This was the story for about five or so years. Slowly over time the guttering got worse and started to flood the balcony outside her front door. Still they council refused to respond to our request for someone to sort the guttering out.Last year We had a period of extra heavy rain. The inevitable happened, Water from the busted guttering flooded her out.  It poured in through the front door from the now badly flooding balcony, it poured in through the wall, it poured in through the ceiling. All the hard work, the new furniture, everything ruined. She contacts the council. The council told her the following, “ we are only responsible for our property, not yours.” They were adamant, The lady upstairs made phone call after phone call and they refused to budge. It was at this time she found out the cancer was back.Now downstairs in my place I start to have problems. The lady’s front door balcony sits on top of my kitchen and bathroom. Water starts coming through my bathroom wall. I reported it, along with the nasty crack it had left behind, and again it was ignored. During all this the guttering leak was now a waterfall. Directly under the now wrecked guttering is a drain. Over time the guttering had been pounding away at it. Slowly the earth around it gets washed away, leaving a floating drain. The pipe from the drain was the old terracotta type and fed into the sewer. The terracotta pipe which was now open to the elements was pounded to oblivion by the waterfall. Eventually I start to get effluent flooding around my back door.Meanwhile upstairs the lady has started to carry out repairs at her own expense. Wall plaster was replaced, ceilings replaced, fitted kitchen replaced, and wet furniture replaced. She’s still rattling the council’s cage over the damage with lots of calls. Because she had exhausted her finances getting the place fitted out the first time, she’s now using her credit card to fix the damage this time. Any hope of early retirement is well and truly gone while she clears them up. The lady upstairs has just had a phone call from the hospital. She’s now got a date to start the reconstruction surgery. She has booked two weeks holiday so she can have it. Then it’s back to work so she can get her credit card paid off. She needs a couple of months of work, hell she needs to retire.

Dennis Bailey ● 2279d4 Comments ● 2265d

Claiming money back for Council Tax Summons

Dear all,Having finally left the clutches of seemingly the world's most inefficient and useless council they have decided to try and have one final bite at the apple, so to speak.Accordingly, I am looking for any possible advice about claiming money back from Ealing Council for yet another kangaroo court appearance - I am on my fourth Council Tax Summons (with a win rate of 3 out of 3 to date), and have just been Summonsed for a fourth time from the charlatans at Ealing Council.To cut a long story short, I moved out of my previous address on September 26th, and began paying Council Tax immediately in Wadnsworth, my new sole and only residence, via direct debit. I duly completed Ealing's Moving In/ Moving Out form, informing them that although I had moved out the remaining tenant was still in the property for a further month.Having heard nothing from them by way of confirmation, I received in November a 'Council Tax Reminder' with both my name and the name of the other tenant on it for the month of October, which I forwarded on to him and emailed the council with an explanation that the other tenant does not reside with me and that I left in September, receipt of the Moving In/ Moving Out form and a copy of my current tenancy agreement. Despite this I had heard nothing back until early this week, where myself and the other tenant (who I have explained to Ealing Council until I am blue in the face does NOT live with me) were named to be Summonsed.I have absolutely no doubt that I will win yet another case, as I am now well versed in dealing with their inefficiencies having done so on a yearly basis since 2016, though if there is any further advice on anything I may have missed I would be obliged to receive it(!), though my main question is that, now having to come back from Wandsworth to Ealing in February to contest this incurring transport and off-work costs in the process, is there any way I can claim this back from the council for the time spent dealing with them, their summons and general irritation?On the plus side I have had absolutely no problem with my new council - who have already been more than pleasant in all dealings I have had with them. Their Moving In form was comparably a breeze!Many thanks in advance for any insights anyone may be able to give!

Olly Rogers ● 2292d10 Comments ● 2272d

Prolific Murderer - Harold Jones?

Further to the B.B.C. 4 documentary Dark Son - The Hunt for a Serial Killer being broadcast nationally at 9.00 pm on Tuesday February 12.  South Wales Police are actively pursuing forensic opportunities to link Abertillery-born Jones to the murder of 12 year-old Swansea school-girl Muriel Joan Drinkwater, 3 months after he left the army in 1946. A third cold-case team are actively researching Jones' possible involvement in the murder of Ignac Ulycz in Putney in August 1965. See information below from my book "Who Was Jack the Stripper? The Hammersmith Nudes' Murders."(At 10.45 pm on Sunday 15 August 1965, Mr Ignac Ulycz was fatally stabbed outside his own front gate at 323 Upper Richmond Road Putney...........Maddalena Ulycz told the police the assailant was between 50 and 60 years old. (Jones was 59.) Another witness said that the attacker had run around the corner into Colinette Road and just seemed to vanish into thin air. (Jones had been living in 20 Colinette Road.)The Wandsworth Boro' News of Friday 24 September 1965 reported on the inquest into the death of Mr Ulycz.........."The man who killed Mr Ulycz........may have been insane or a psychopath who every now and again feels the desire to attack someone in this way" suggests the Coroner Mr Gavin Thurston.)The fact has now emerged that Jones was living at 20 Colinette Road Putney using the name Harry Stevens while AT THE SAME TIME registered as living at 51 Aldensley Road Hammersmith under the name Harry Jones.

Neil Milkins ● 2272d0 Comments ● 2272d

Kensington to Hounslow corridor

Over the last 5 years there has been massive construction of private apartments along the corridor from Kensington to Hounslow, such that currently, during the morning and evening extended rush hours being able to get on a bus has become more and more difficult.On this route, the access to the Piccadilly line to get to Heathrow has escalator/lift access at only Hammersmith and East/West Hounslow. This means that disabled people, those who suffer from claustrophobia and those with heavy baggage in this area, are forced to use a taxi, at a cost of £20 - £40. When the matter has been raised over the last few years with TFL, the ongoing excuse is that it would make the route too long!  So if that is the case, would TFL give consideration to introducing a new service to start, when the N9 stops its extension during the day, known as an EXPRESS service 9 (X9) running during the day and only stopping at centres of commercial areas with many other local bus services, or underground, serving as a feeder service. This would have a considerable number of benefits for all users plus those who want to travel long distances on the existing services, being able to travel quicker than staying on the local bus service, as with the 607 along Uxbridge RoadPROPOSED BUS STOPSHammersmith Bus Station, (Start point of service) Stop BTurnham Green Church Stop DD/CVBrentford High Street Stop BL/BNIsleworth Stop FHounslow West Station Stop AHeathrow Central Bus Station Stand 19Heathrow T5 Stand 6All these stops are on the existing N9 service route.BONUSWith ongoing problem of existing road congestion, and the construction of the new runway, it is forecast that there will be considerable delays in the local area. As a case in point on the morning of 9 November I went to collect a passenger from T3 and it took 1 HOUR to get from the junction with the M4 into Terminal 3! In the event that these sorts of congestion arise again, the Local TFL area manager can decide to turn the bus around at Hounslow West station, thus allowing passengers for Heathrow to transfer onto the Piccadilly line into LHR.If you support this concept for an additional service, every concerned person would be gratefully appreciated. To do this, please send an email to your MP and London assembly representative.  Please also put any ideas that make the idea more relevant, and then post them to the forum.'See https://www.theyworkforyou.com/mp/ where you can find details of you MP and https://www.london.gov.uk/people/assembly for your GLA representative. When posting your support, copy and paste the above leaving the last paragraph off the paste.

Philip Weaver ● 2330d8 Comments ● 2301d

B.B.C. Documentary.

B,B.C. 2 Wales at 9.00 pm on January 12. For viewers with Sky and Freeview it can also be seen on the same date and time. Otherwise for viewers throughout the U.K it can be viewed at 9.00pm pm on B.B.C.4 on January 22.                                                                                                                             It is the biggest unsolved serial murder case in British criminal history - the so-called 'Jack the Stripper' murders took place in Swinging Sixties London.Six women lost their lives to a killer who was never caught. Criminologist Professor David Wilson leads an investigation to unmask the killer, who claimed more victims than even his notorious Victorian namesake, Jack the Ripper.Professor Wilson and his investigative team - which includes former detective Jackie Malton and forensic psychologist Professor Mike Berry - begin their hunt for the killer not in London, but 150 miles away in Abertillery, South Wales. In 1921, the Welsh mining town was devastated by the double murder of two schoolgirls when eight-year-old Freda Brunell and 11-year-old Florence Little were killed just weeks apart by a local boy 15-year-old Harold Jones, who the Abertillery residents still refer to as their 'Dark Son'.Those murders - especially the sadistic nature of their deaths, and the treatment of the bodies afterwards - have eerie parallels with the 'Jack the Stripper' murders. Could Harold Jones the boy killer really have matured in later life into a serial killer?To test this theory, the team revisit the scenes of the murders in west London. They use contemporary policing techniques such as geographical and offender profiling to see if the crimes of Jones the boy can be measured against those of Jack the Stripper. And from the outset, it becomes apparent there are many chilling similarities.

Neil Milkins ● 2306d0 Comments ● 2306d

December smile

A Nun Grading PapersCAN YOU IMAGINE THE NUN SITTING AT HER DESK GRADING THESE PAPERS, ALL THE WHILE TRYING TO KEEP A STRAIGHT FACE AND MAINTAIN HER COMPOSURE!PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO THE WORDING AND SPELLING. IF YOU KNOW THE BIBLE EVEN A LITTLE, YOU'LL FIND THIS HILARIOUS! IT COMES FROM A CATHOLIC ELEMENTARY SCHOOL TEST. KIDS WERE ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT THE OLD AND NEW TESTAMENTS. THE FOLLOWING 25 STATEMENTS ABOUT THE BIBLE WERE WRITTEN BY CHILDREN.THEY HAVE NOT BEEN RETOUCHED OR CORRECTED. INCORRECT SPELLING HAS BEEN LEFT IN.1. IN THE FIRST BOOK OF THE BIBLE, GUINESSIS. GOD GOT TIRED OF CREATING THE WORLD SO HE TOOK THE SABBATH OFF.2. ADAM AND EVE WERE CREATED FROM AN APPLE TREE. NOAH'S WIFE WAS JOAN OF ARK. NOAH BUILT AND ARK AND THE ANIMALS CAME ON IN PEARS. 3. LOTS WIFE WAS A PILLAR OF SALT DURING THE DAY, BUT A BALL OF FIRE DURING THE NIGHT. 4. THE JEWS WERE A PROUD PEOPLE AND THROUGHOUT HISTORY THEY HAD TROUBLE WITH UNSYMPATHETIC GENITALS.5. SAMPSON WAS A STRONGMAN WHO LET HIMSELF BE LED ASTRAY BY A JEZEBEL LIKE DELILAH. 6. SAMSON SLAYED THE PHILISTINES WITH THE AXE OF THE APOSTLES. 7. MOSES LED THE JEWS TO THE RED SEA WHERE THEY MADE UNLEAVENED BREAD, WHICH IS BREAD WITHOUT ANY INGREDIENTS. 8. THE EGYPTIANS WERE ALL DROWNED IN THE DESSERT. AFTERWARDS, MOSES WENT UP TO MOUNT CYANIDE TO GET THE TEN COMMANDMENTS.9. THE FIRST COMMANDMENTS WAS WHEN EVE TOLD ADAM TO EAT THE APPLE.10. THE SEVENTH COMMANDMENT IS THOU SHALT NOT ADMIT ADULTERY. 11. MOSES DIED BEFORE HE EVER REACHED CANADA THEN JOSHUA LED THE HEBREWS IN THE BATTLE OF GERITOL. 12. THE GREATEST MIRICLE IN THE BIBLE IS WHEN JOSHUA TOLD HIS SON TO STAND STILL AND HE OBEYED HIM.13. DAVID WAS A HEBREW KING WHO WAS SKILLED AT PLAYING THE LIAR. HE FOUGHT THE FINKELSTEINS, A RACE OF PEOPLE WHO LIVED IN BIBLICAL TIMES.14. SOLOMON, ONE OF DAVIDS SONS, HAD 300 WIVES AND 700 PORCUPINES. 15. WHEN MARY HEARD SHE WAS THE MOTHER OF JESUS, SHE SANG THE MAGNA CARTA. 16. WHEN THE THREE WISE GUYS FROM THE EAST SIDE ARRIVED THEY FOUND JESUS IN THE MANAGER. 17. JESUS WAS BORN BECAUSE MARY HAD AN IMMACULATE CONTRAPTION. 18. ST. JOHN THE BLACKSMITH DUMPED WATER ON HIS HEAD. 19. JESUS ENUNCIATED THE GOLDEN RULE, WHICH SAYS TO DO UNTO OTHERS BEFORE THEY DO ONE TO YOU. HE ALSO EXPLAINED A MAN DOTH NOT LIVE BY SWEAT ALONE.20. IT WAS A MIRICLE WHEN JESUS ROSE FROM THE DEAD AND MANAGED TO GET THE TOMBSTONE OFF THE ENTRANCE. 21. THE PEOPLE WHO FOLLOWED THE LORD WERE CALLED THE 12 DECIBELS.22. THE EPISTELS WERE THE WIVES OF THE APOSTLES.23. ONE OF THE OPPOSSUMS WAS ST. MATTHEW WHO WAS ALSO A TAXIMAN.24. ST. PAUL CAVORTED TO CHRISTIANITY, HE PREACHED HOLY ACRIMONY, WHICH IS ANOTHER NAME FOR MARRAIGE. 25. CHRISTIANS HAVE ONLY ONE SPOUSE. THIS IS CALLED MONOTONY.

Graham Weeks ● 2338d10 Comments ● 2313d

Another money making scheme from the Council

We are due to have a consultation about the installation of electric vehicle charging points.On the Council's website the relevant page states that anyone wishing to have one installed on the street outside their house MUST be prepared to make a financial contribution, probably in the region of £500. You might get some of this back but you will effectively be paying for a public service.The details are here: https://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/201173/transport_and_parking/1316/electric_cars_and_charging_points/2I have asked local councillors to clarify but have met with a smug response from Labour's Paul Driscoll. He seems to think that the word must doesn't infer an obligation - he's a teacher so I've suggested he talks to someone in the English department to clarify the meaning of the word.It seems there's not actually enough funding for this project, hence the need to ask for contributions. What it will do is put a further squeeze on parking spaces in CPZ zones. You won't get guaranteed use of the charging point even if you stump up the cash.It's all very well telling us that it's for the environment but the Council is not addressing the real pollution problem, which is the vast volume of traffic that passes through the borough every day on its way somewhere else. Poor road management and interminable road works slow the pace of this traffic and increase pollution. Adding costs to residents won't make a jot of difference.

Simon Hayes ● 2370d25 Comments ● 2363d

Walpole cafe and PMGT

Further to PMGT’s response to Ealing today’s article on my cafe. I would like to respond:-I  would like to correct a few inaccuracies in PMGT’s statement to you.Firstly, neither PMGT or the council kept me informed that the operation of my cafe was going out to tender imminently. In fact, I received a telephone call from Chris Bunting from Ealing Council telling me the cafe was going out to tender and I would hear from PMGT in the next few days via email.  Accordingly the tender request came through a couple of days after this call on 3rd October. I immediately contacted Vivienne Cane- Honeysett one of the trustees who frequents the cafe, expressing my distress and shoddy treatment , as I had been running the cafe for nine years. I heard nothing back from either Vivienne or PMGT Trustees. You will appreciate from this, my invitation to tender was certainly not warm as PMGT state and no consideration was afforded me as a loyal proprietor that has supported both the council and PMGT through their extensive building programme. Can I make it clear I have been providing a good and constant service since I opened in 2009 in the old wooden cafe before it was demolished. PMGT state that we closed during this time, on the contrary we remained open throughout until the Rickyard cafe was built.We operated from a portacabin for nearly two years due to building works overrunning at the Rickyard centre. We never complained  and worked with the council to facilitate our move to the Rickyard  building. I have chosen to place this in the public domain,  because of how PMGT have handled this matter and also because I have been so encouraged by the local community and our supportive and fantastic customers.PMGT claim this is in the best interests of the wider Ealing community, but the community have not been consulted and there has been no transparency or involvement from any of the local community groups. This is why in less than 24 hours nearly 2,000 local people have signed our online petition in protest at PMGT’s proposed actions and treatment of a loyal small family run business.I am expected to walk away from a business that I have nurtured for nine years at great investment in both time and money and hand my business to a new operator. I would suspect it will be a large chain that will also take on the new garden restaurant at the front of the Manor House.  I am not sure that PMGT understands  what is actually in the best interests of the wider community, If they did they would consult and involve the community as a whole and ascertain exactly what the community want for their cafe. They have failed to do this. Alan Dillon

Alan Dillon ● 2699d36 Comments ● 2365d

Was That Wise Hilary?

I've just been looking at some coverage of today's Labour party conference and a bit of a stir has been caused by a delegate from the Ealing Central and Acton constituency Hilary Wise. She made a speech to congress in which she said that the accusations of anti-semitism in the Labour party were overblown and the number of actual instances were miniscule. She blamed the growing the perception that Labour was anti-semitic on neo-Liberals withing the party and the mainstream media. She got a very positive reception from the hall although the chair apparently warned her for some of the language she used. I do wonder if Jeremy Corbyn was in the hall if his heart sank when she got up to speak. He has been spending the last few weeks trying to put this issue to bed and was presumably hoping that the conference would talk about things like renationalisation and higher taxes for the rich. Anything but Jews or Brexit basically. The other thing that really should have given Hilary pause for thought is that people are going to wonder about the motivations of anyone who solely focuses on the activities of Israel. By the standards of the middle east it has killed relatively few of its minorities.  While it is certainly true the Israelis tend to overreact to provocation, provoked they certainly are. The rights that a Palestinian has in Israel are significantly more extensive than they would have in Lebanon. This is an area of the world where there are a lot of bad actors and a lot of governments who don't behave the way they should including Israel. The question really is why do so many people in the Labour party think that it is exclusively the one run by Jews that is a problem?

Dennis O'Shea ● 2407d14 Comments ● 2395d

Free 24,000 Maple or Birch Trees for Londoners!! Two each by ballot. 50 trees for community groups

Plant a treeHelp to make London greener, healthier and wilder by joining London’s biggest ever tree planting weekend on 1 and 2 December. Plant trees in your garden, in your community, or at a mass planting event and help to make London a National Park City.You can get two free trees for your garden in a London-wide ballot, 50 trees for your community organisation and have your own group planting, or go to Perivale Park in Ealing that weekend and help plantHOW TO GET FREE TREES FOR YOUR GARDEN TO HELP MAKE LONDON GREENER AND WILDERThe Mayor of London/London Assembly is working with the Woodland Trust, The Queen’s Commonwealth Canopy and Sainsbury’s to give away 24,000 free trees by ballot to Londoners.How does it work? https://www.london.gov.uk/plant-a-tree/What type of trees will be provided - are they right for my garden?All of our trees are field maple or birch – beautiful garden species that are great for wildlife and easy to plant. The saplings will be between 20-40 cm high and the trees can be kept fairly small. Their spectacular autumn colours will look great in your garden.The trees come in packs of two – so you can plant one and give one to a friend.How does the ballot work?You’ll need to apply by 5 November and let us know where you’d like your saplings to be sent.Then you’ll be entered into a London-wide ballot to win one of the tree packs. The winning entries will be selected at random from all Londoners that apply.If I’m successful, what happens next?If your name is drawn, your pack of two saplings will be sent to you by the end of November. When they arrive, it will be right in the middle of planting season – and you’ll be able to join thousands of Londoners planting trees in neighbourhoods across London during our city-wide planting weekend on 1 and 2 December. All you’ll need is a spade!COMMUNITY ORGANISATIONS: GET 50 FREE TREES TO BRIGHTEN UP YOUR LONDON NEIGHBOURHOODThe Mayor of London/Londaon Assembly is working with The Conservation Volunteers to give away 25,000 trees to community groups across the city – and help bring cleaner, fresher air to all Londoners.https://www.london.gov.uk/community-treesWhat type of trees will be provided - are they right for my community?Your trees will be a mixture of UK native species specially chosen by The Conservation Volunteers - they are great for wildlife and easy to plant. The saplings will be between 20-60cm high and come in packs of 50, making them the perfect addition to any communal green space.How do I order my trees?You’ll need to apply before the 22 November and let us know where you’d like your saplings to be sent. They will be available on a first-come, first-served basis, so place your order now.What happens next?Your pack of trees will be sent to you by the end of November. When they arrive, it will be right in the middle of planting season – and you’ll be able to join thousands of Londoners planting trees in neighbourhoods across London during our city-wide planting weekend on 1 and 2 December. We’ll also send you a short planting guide to help you get started.VOLUNTEER AT A TREE PLANTING EVENTDon’t have your own space to plant a tree but still want to make London greener, healthier and wilder? Roll up your sleeves and get involved in an event on London’s biggest ever tree planting weekend on 1 and 2 December.https://www.london.gov.uk/what-we-do/environment/parks-green-spaces-and-biodiversity/tree-planting/volunteerCommunities across the capital will be planting trees, including 4 mass planting events with our lead events partner, Trees for Cities, at:    Forest Road Recreation Ground, Redbridge    Beckenham Place Park, Lewisham    Montagu Recreation Ground, Enfield    Perivale Park, EalingYou’ll be able to find out more about the events and how you can get involved later this month. Sign up to our mailing list and we’ll let you know when volunteering registration opens.If you would like to host a planting event, order your free pack of 50 trees now or email trees@london.gov.uk to add your event to our listings.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2399d2 Comments ● 2398d

Step free Northfields

It does seem strange that both South Ealing and Northfields stations, both very busy stations, still have no step free access between them.I do recall when working on a local paper in the 1980s at an LRT press conference, that part and parcel of the rebuilding of South Ealing station without a lift facility was because it would be included in the refurbishment of Northfields " in due course".This was of course in a period of run down and neglect of the Underground network in general and then followed the Kings Cross fire and all resources were redirected to stations with wooden escalators.Northfields station by then was a listed building and was eventually refurbished in keeping with it's listed status to a degree.However, the probable deferment and eventual dropping of any sort of lift access is more likely to do with the huge cost due to the actual structural construction method of the station buildings.   The huge cost is unviable as originally conceived.However,There may well be another option though which is still evidential on the trackside to the north and east of the station.Northfields Station had a long forgotten second entrance in Weymouth Avenue. Lurking in the overgrowth are the concrete pillars that supported the raised walkway which linked to a footbridge and stairs to the two platforms at the Eastern end of the station platforms.Two possibilities :1. To recreate the raised but covered walkway from Northfields Stn parallel to the platforms linking to lifts at the far end by reinstating the gantry bridge2. Additionally reinstating the link to Weymouth Avenue as a secondary access which would also be step free which would benefit those who cannot use South Ealing which is unlikely to ever be step free.This would mean minimal structural works to the actual station and platforms at Northfields making cost effective and thus a viable possibility.

Mark Kehoe ● 2411d7 Comments ● 2401d

EALING'S DANGEROUS TOWER BLOCKS

There are four tower blocks in Ealing with dangerous cladding.  The Council, however, has refused to say where they are. It is relying on Government Guidance not to reveal locations.  It is not mandatory to follow Guidance.  The “received wisdom” is that it should be followed unless a local authority has a good reason for acting against it.   There is every reason in this case to disregard it. My local councillor, Yvonne Johnson, has told me that the Council conducted a survey of tower blocks.  The dangerous ones were evidently not ones belonging to the Council, but the question remains:  Where are they?  There are further questions.  At what level in the Council and by whom specifically was it decided to follow Guidance and keep the locations secret? Does the Council, while not owning them, house people there?  Who does own them?  (If we knew the addresses, we could discover the owners’ names from the Land Registry). Have the owners done anything about the situation?  Are there still people living in them?  Allowing the public to know the locations and so the identity of the freehold owners of the properties would serve the purpose of putting pressure on them to do something about their dangerous buildings.  The Grenfell tragedy affected not only the residents of that block;  it also affected the wider neighbourhood.   The neighbours of these towers have every right to know they are living near to dangerous buildings.   This is not a situation in which secrecy is appropriate.   The information that is needed involves third parties (the owners of the blocks), but this is a case where the confidentially that might enjoy should be set aside in the interest of the greater public good.

Andrew Farmer ● 2405d1 Comments ● 2403d

South Ealing mobilises against Assyrian Centre club licence bid meet your ward councillor tonight

Ward Councillor David Millican is holding one of his "Meet the Councillors" evenings. Justine Greening MP will also be there on Wednesday 5 September. I know if several people who will be attending to make their thoughts known on the Assyrian Centre Crisis. Come and meet us and share your views on Wednesday 5 September from 7:30pm at The Harvester, Boston Rd W7 2AX.  There’s no charge but you are asked to buy yourself a drink from the bar.Everyone in South Ealing knows the Assyrian Centre with its ant-social activities. Its visitors park on the pavements, block the double yellow line safety corners, boy-race at all hours of the night and are violent and agressive towards residents who try and comment protest. Load music and disorder accompanies all its social events into the night and local residents are disturbed by drunks wandering down surrounding streets to try and find their cars at all ours of the night.Placed next door to Roddys Bar (or should it be Druggies Bar) and the L'Oro di Napoli it looks as though a new slum is being created. Every night for weeks now one of the L'Oro stafs been parking on the pavement on the Quad and most people cross the road to avoid walking past Roddys with its heaving mess of drugged and drunk people, South Ealing is becoming the scum corner of Ealing and we need to stop it. The last thing we need is a Barracuda Club or a giant Crispins attracting the night-time scum of EalingNorthfield Ward Councillor David Millicam is working hard on this issue and has already send this:This message was sent with High importance.David MillicanTue 04/09/2018, 16:10Dear South Ealing NeighboursAssyrian Centre Temple Road18LIC54301PREMThe Assyrian Centre have applied for a licence forFilmLive and Recorded musicSale of alcoholPerformance of DanceLate night refreshmentMonday to Thursday to midnightFriday and Saturday to 2:00amSunday to 1:00amThe licensing application is here, which spells out what they want to do.http://maps.ealing.gov.uk/webreports/m3pp/licence_consultation_lookup.aspMany of you have contacted me with complaints of loud music and of noisy and rowdy behaviour of attendees, past midnight and into the small hours, to events at this Assyrian Centre over several years.It is hard to imagine that this will change if this application is approved.You may care to send your comments by writing tolicensing@ealing.gov.ukI hope that this is helpful— David.Councillor David MillicanConservative representing Northfield Ward44 Claygate Road | London | W13 9XG020 8810 1989david.millican@btinternet.comThis license will destroy what's left of South Ealing. Reduce property value. Increase the crime right. Disturb nighttime sleep and should worry parents of young children.

Jane F. Tetter ● 2427d1 Comments ● 2406d

Return to Ealing and update

Return to Ealing, by John BetjemanReturn, return to Ealing,Worn poet of the farm!Regain your boyhood feelingOf uninvaded calm!For there the leafy avenuesOf lime and chestnut mix’dDo widely wind, by art designed,The costly houses ’twixt.No early morning tractorsThe thrush and blackbird drown,No nuclear reactorsBulge huge below the down,No youth upon his motor-bikeHis lust for power fulfilWith dentist’d drill intent to killThe silence of the hills.In Ealing on a SundayBell-haunted quiet falls,In Ealing on a Monday‘Milk-o!’ the milkman calls;No lorries grind in bottom gearUp steep and narrow lanes,Nor constant here offend the earLow-flying aeroplanes.Return, return to Ealing,Worn poet of the farm!Regain your boyhood feelingOf uninvaded calm!Where smoothly glides the bicycleAnd softly flows the BrentAnd a gentle gale from PerivaleSends up the hayfield scent.Return to Ealing, by GrahamReturn, return to Ealing,Worn poet from the sticks!Regain your boyhood feelingOf multi ethnic mix!For there the leafy avenuesOf lime and chestnut mix’dDo widely wind, by art designed,The costly houses ’twixt.No early morning tractorsThe thrush and blackbird drown,No nuclear reactorsBulge huge below the down,The youth upon his motor-bikeHis lust for power fulfilsAnd muggers on their mopedsSnatch mobiles at their wills.In Ealing on a SundaySunday trading malls,In Ealing on a MondayConstant mobile calls;Lorries grind in bottom gearPast buses faster lanes,And constant here offend the earHeathrow's aeroplanes.Return, return to Ealing,Worn poet from the sticks!Regain your boyhood feelingOf multi ethnic mix!Where smoothly glides the bicycleAnd softly flows the BrentAnd Hoovers now in PerivaleHas Tesco flats to rent

Graham Weeks ● 2408d1 Comments ● 2408d

A FESTIVAL OF LITTER

I have just watched the video of the chariot procession organised by the Shri Kanagathurkkai Amman Temple in West Ealing which took place last Sunday, 12 August. On Monday 13 August at 8.00am I made my own video of the aftermath of the event which I have forwarded to Ealing Environmental Services. The video shows Dean Gardens where the event culminates but you can hardly recognize it under the mountain of litter!How can any organisation abuse a public space in the way my video demonstrates and get off scot free? The litter is on a massive scale and is totally unacceptable. Clearly there were litter receptacles available in Dean Gardens but they were treated as though non-existent. I watched the yellow-jacketed litter-collectors wandering around as I made my video. They were in a daze, just not knowing where to begin.I quote from the Council’s own web-pages on the topic of litter:“The council has a zero tolerance policy towards litter and provides litter bins within parks and open spaces for disposal.We also encourage users to take home recycable items, such as cans and news papers, and put them in their household recycling for collection whenever possible, as litter collected in parks and open spaces is currently not recycled.The ranger service use national legislation in order to keep our parks and open spaces free of all unauthorised waste. Under the Environmental Protection Act 1990 it is illegal to drop litter or dump any waste or rubbish on private or public land.Those caught dropping litter which includes chewing gum, apple cores and cigarette butts, may receive a fixed penalty notice of £80 or face a maximum fine of up to £2,500. If necessary, we will take further legal action against other forms of illegal waste.”Well, where to begin?! Where is there any evidence that those attending this event were ‘encouraged’ to take their litter home? Were any ‘fixed penalty notices’ issued?Really, what is the point of publishing a policy on litter if it has no more clout than a piece of wet newspaper?People who use public spaces need to realize (whoever they are) that parks are shared spaces and must be treated with respect so that others can enjoy them too. Suppose, after this event, which should have finished by 4pm, I had wished to take a stroll in the park or walk my dog in the early evening - I would have had to turn back the moment I reached Dean Gardens in total disgust.I also understand that liaison with the organisers of this event and Ealing Council in respect of a Traffic Management Order failed to come to anything but the event was still allowed to proceed with no TMO in place. That is unacceptable. The Council and the organisers of this event need to get their act together so that in future years it is properly organised and the needs of the wider community (not just the Sri Lankan Tamils who are the majority attending the festival) are understood and respected.Perhaps all who attend should be issued with a complimentary large bin-bag and encouraged by prominently displayed posters to ‘Take Your Litter Home’.This is an annual event which is getting out of hand. It needs urgent review and proper future control.Yours,Kitsana Udomcharoen

Vincent Paul Wrigley ● 2448d13 Comments ● 2434d

August smile

What name do you give a lady who has to tell a joke twice? Repunzel.Son: “Dad, we’re learning about prisms at school. They’re fascinating.”Dad: “That’s good son, because as a dyslexic black boy you’re bound to end up in one.” Paddy decides to take up boxing and goes for the required medical. A few days later the doctor ‘phones and says “Paddy, you realise you’ve got sugar diabetes.”Paddy says, “Nice one, when do I fight him?” A dwarf goes to a very good but very busy doctor and asks "I know you are busy but do you treat dwarves?"The doctor replies "Yes, but you will have to be a little patient". In hindsight I should have posted my Facebook status as: "I've blown the head gasket on my 1997 XR3i" rather than "I've just bu**ered a  14 year old escort".The police still haven't seen the funny side, my lap top's been confiscated, and the wife has gone off to her mother.A Yorkshire man takes his cat to the vet.Yorkshireman: "Ayup, lad, I need to talk to thee about me cat."Vet: "Is it a tom?"Yorkshireman: "Nay, I've browt it with us."A Yorkshireman's dog dies and as it was a favourite pet he decides to have a gold statue made by a jeweller to remember the dog by.Yorkshireman: "Can tha mek us a gold statue of yon dog?"Jeweller: "Do you want it 18 carat?"Yorkshireman: "No I want it chewin' a bone yer daft begger!"The last is always bestBloke from Barnsley with piles asks chemist "Nah then lad, does tha sell arse cream?"Chemist replies "Aye, Magnum or Cornetto?"

Graham Weeks ● 2443d2 Comments ● 2440d

NOT another (slum of the future short lifespan) block of flats PLEASE (Wickes site South Ealing)

As Ealing is beaten into mediocrity by the rise of profiteering property developers building huge blocks of ecologically unsustainable flats with short lifespans (20 or 30 years) that clash with the victorian architecture we muat ask questions about what is going to happen with the site that has just changed hands that has the Wickes store on it in South Ealing.God help us if the new owners of the Wickes site want to build a residential tower block there.On the other hand if the site was to become an Aldi, Lidl, or ASDA than that would address the social community necessities of South Ealing from the new developments on the south side of the A4 through to Ealing Broadway with its half-sized Tesco, Morrisons et al. However, like many stores in the high land cost and high rent area of W5 including the shopping centre the Wickes in South Ealing is not a full Wickes as it is just not large enough. It only carries about three-quarters of the product range, an 'Ealing-factor' where all our superstores are too small due to freeholder/land-owner greed and deficient planning policy so I don't hold out too much hope for something that is not a development combining overpriced small retail spaces (no doubt to be filled with yet more chicken shops, hairdressers and small convenience stores) with shoebox studio flats so expensive that they will only be crammed with groups of students to each room, so I guess an overpriced convenience store of sorts is the best that we can expect there in future.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2444d12 Comments ● 2442d

EALING COUNCIL GUILTY OF MALADMINSTRATION

Ealing Council has been found guilty of maladministration by the Ombudsman for refusing to accept a complaint made by myself and 5 of my neighbours.  It concerned a run-down HMO on Uxbridge Road.  The rooms were damp.  The walls were mouldy and crumbling.  The fire-escape route was blocked with furniture and rubbish and there were no fire-doors.  The owner was forced to upgrade it.  No credit to him.   It shouldn’t have been in that state to start with.  Despite his record, the Council reappointed him as a fit and proper person to manage the place.   This is the Council that pretends to care about the conditions people live in! The Council refused to accept the complaint.  It was for that the Ombudsman found it guilty of maladministration.   Four senior officers were involved.   The last, the Executive Director for Corporate Resources,  threatened to declare us “persistent complainants” if we carried on.   We carried on and the Ombudsman supported us, not him.Did they learn their lesson?  No. The  Executive Director for Corporate Resources went ahead, accused us being persistent complainants and imposed a sanction.  Preposterous.  The Ombudsman found us right to persist.  If anything, the Executive Director should have apologised.  We asked CEO Najsarek to dissociate himself from his nonsense.  He failed to do that.  We have made a formal complaint about both of them.  We’ll keep you informed of its progress. The Ombudsman asked the Council to remind officers to handle complaints properly in future.  Two senior officers are still taking not a scrap of notice and sitting on complaints.  Disobeying their employer’s instruction.   Bad enough the LGO rebukes the Council.   10 times worse when the Council treats its findings with cynical scorn.  We were awarded a sum of money.  Who pays?   Thank you, people of Ealing.  You do, from your council tax.  We not only have to pay the salaries of these people we have to compensate ourselves for their misconduct.  This complaint was about senior officers and handled by senior officers.  They are a corrupt collective, covering up for one another. They get away with it because they know they can.  As long as they remain in post, no one can trust the Council’s complaints procedure. No one can trust the Council.What happened to the officer who reappointed the manager?  He is now in charge of Safer Communities.  Hope the fire-brigade is on alert.  It could only happen in London’s rottenest Borough!  

vincent paul WRIGLEY ● 2470d19 Comments ● 2447d

Ealing Restaurant Applying to Stay Open All Night

When I was searching for something else I incidentally came across an application by the Palm Grill on Hanger Lane for an extension of opening hours to 5am and to play recorded music for this time. It may be that proximity to the A40 means that residents aren't going to be particularly bothered about the extra noise but given that these things often sneak through because they are not properly publicised I thought I'd post details here:
LONDON BOROUGH OF EALING. LICENSING ACT 2003 NOTICE OF APPLICATION FOR NEW/VARIATION* PREMISES LICENCE / CLUB CERTIFICATE* Murtadha Rajab Has applied to Ealing Council for new/variation of a premises licence / club premises certificate* for:The Palm Grill, 11 Royal Parade, London, W5 1ET The proposed new/variations/timings are as follows: Provision of late night refreshments (from 23.00 to 05.00) and use of recorded music (from 12.00 to 05.00). Opening hours 12.00 to 05.00 Any person wishing to submit representations to this application must give notice in writing to:Licensing Team, Perceval House, 14-16 Uxbridge Road, Ealing W5 2HL. Tel 020 8825 6655. Fax: 020 8825 8750. Email: licensing@ealing.gov.uk Not later than 31/07/2018 Dated this 26 day of June 2018 Signed: Murtadha Rajab Note 1: Representations must relate to one or more of the four licensing objectives. 1. Prevention of crime and disorder. 2. Public safety. 3. Prevention of public nuisance. 4. Protection of children from harm Note 2: Anonymous representations cannot be accepted. Note 3: Copies of representations will be included in reports to the licensing sub-committee and therefore will pass into the public domain Note 4: It is an offence liable on conviction to a fine up to level 5 (£5’000) on the standard scale under section 158 of the Licensing Act 2003 to knowingly or recklessly make a false statement in connection with this application TM Ref: 225496609-01

Dennis O'Shea ● 2478d0 Comments ● 2478d

The Will of the People and Brexit

One thing that really surprised me after the referendum is how polarised and tribal the issue became after the result. Many people had quite fluid views before the vote but afterwards they seem to have become set in stone with a relatively small proportion changing their minds. Most of the polls held since have shown a majority of people now want to Remain but the swing is a result of people having been undecided at the time of the referendum changing their minds. The most recent Survation poll does suggest that this is starting to change with a 6% gap between Remain and Leave. This was held before the news about Airbus and BMW so that gap is only going to get bigger. I've had a number of conversations with ardent Leavers in recent weeks in which they have said that they still would vote the same way even though their son's/daughter's, grandson's/granddaughter's employer would be negatively affected by leaving the EU. It occurs to me that many people might be saying this because they don't want to admit an error or to changing their mind after arguing so stridently for one point of view but if they were given the chance again in a live vote rather than a poll they would put the interests of their family members ahead of their desire for vindication. This would mean that the polls currently are significantly understating the swing towards Remain and, if there were a second referendum, the will of the people would clearly be to stay in the EU. It would really be helpful for someone to explain to me why, given that the will of the British people seems to have decisively changed, that we should be inflicting something on them that is clearly not wanted or in their best interest.


Andy Jones ● 2499d65 Comments ● 2483d

Withdrawal of proposed increases in Resident Parking Permit Charges and introduction of shared use p

There is a second petition doing the rounds which stands a better chance of winning the council round, providing it gets enough signatures. There is nothing to stop anyone signing both petitions.  This one has been written by the residents in Southfields Ward and unlike other Wards, Julian Bell has agreed to meet with them and their Lib Dem Ward Councillors.The current proposals which include a borough roll out of Order 4114 (removal of some resident bays and introduction of shared bays amongst other things) to allow commuters and persons going to Heathrow to park close to Elizabeth Line and other stations.  Whilst resident permits will be made up of location and vehicle emissions rating, the incomers will only be charged on location and pay far less than they would at stations outside the borough or at the airport. Coupled with the inconvenience of an incomer parking for an estimated £4.00 a day outside your house for a couple of weeks just adds insult to injury. Ealing Borough is 55.53 kmsq, as a Zone 2 borough we have contributed £35 a msq, (you do the maths) for the building of Crossrail/Elizabeth Line. Crossrail was built to stop people driving into London.  Why are Ealing now encouraging people to do this? Their own Transport Strategy has been written to positively discourage its residents from driving. “Research indicates that annually, up to 9,000 early deaths across London and 387 early deaths within LB Ealing have been attributed to poor air quality” (from vehicle emissions). The increase of traffic at peak times rat running through the borough will also increase the potential for RTAs. And all this to raise mere extra £250,000 is just plain stupid and clearly unfair.Please read and sign this petition:http://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/ePetitions/tabid/96/ID/50/Withdrawal-of-proposed-increases-in-Resident-Parking-Permit-Charges-and-introduction-of-shared-use-parking-bays.aspx

Libby Kemp ● 2488d6 Comments ● 2488d

W13: Confirmed Animal Killer Incident

Please note that the police have confirmed that on Thursday in W13 there was a cat killed by the serial "UK Cat Killer", originally known as the Croyden Cat Killer. If you have a cat, the advice is to keep it indoors at night as this is when the killer is striking in the main.For those not aware of this case, the particular individual concerned has killed and mutilated at least 300 cats as well as foxes, squirrels, rabbits  and a deer.  These are just the confirmed cases.  There is a particular pattern for this killer and the police can and do confirm whether an incident fits the profile and they are actively on the case.The South Norwood Animal Rescue and Liberty (SNARL) charity are the main people co-ordinating cases with the police, who are very concerned that it not a big step for this person to progress to killing people as well.Every time an animal is killed, SNARL undertake a leaflet posting action in the local area.  If you can help with this in West London as needed, please contact SNARL.  https://www.facebook.com/South-Norwood-Animal-Rescue-and-Liberty-SNARL-624100301029007/SNARL will also pass on information about any of the crimes to the Police and any tips if people do not wish to contact the police directly about this.There have been a few copycat crimes since the cases have been publicised but the danger of this person is such that there has to be publicity to find this person, bring them to justice and get them off the streets.

Samantha-Jane Hunt ● 2501d0 Comments ● 2501d

Memorial Service.

On Saturday 4 August 2018 at 2.00pm, a memorial service is being held in the Metropole Theatre, Abertillery, South Wales for two Abertillery murder victims, 8 year-old Freda Burnell and 11 year-old Florence Little who were killed in Abertillery in 1921.Their killer, Harold Jones a.k.a Harry Stevens lived in Fulham, Putney and Hammersmith between 1946 and 1971 when he died. With a choir and town band performing at the memorial service there is expected to be over 250 people attending. There will be an expected 50 members of the 2 girls' family members attending from various parts of Britain. After the service there will be a re-dedication of the 2 girls' memorials at Brynithel Cemetery.Over the past 7 months, myself, Councillors Gill Clark and Julie Holt have raised nearly £3,400.00 towards the cost of restoring the 2 dilapidated memorials. We are still about £200 short of paying the memorial mason who has done the work at cost price and about £300 short of printing 260 memorial service programmes. These will consist of 8 pages each.We have now been given a donation to book the Metropole Theatre for the event. We  have also been kindly offered a donation of £300 towards the cost a buffet that will be held in the Metropole later in the afternoon.If anyone would like to consider making a donation for this worthy cause please contact me on 07989555376 or n.milkin@sky.comPlease google Florence Little/Freda Burnell  or Harold Jones - Killer for more information.Regards.Neil Milkins

Neil Milkins ● 2516d2 Comments ● 2515d

GARDENS:  National Gardens Scheme/Ealing in Bloom

Do you need inspiration?I happened upon a National Gardens Scheme (ngs) open garden when working in Hammersmith the other day and managed to grab a look.  It was inspirational - it was probably about 5m x 2 and a half.  Enough space to sit outside the kitchen on a bench and have a cup of coffee and enjoy the plants in front of you and growing up the walls/fence. A peaceful little green oasis away from the grey hard surfaced pavements and busy A4.  It had grass in the middle - not a lot but real grass proving that you don't have to turn any small garden into a patio.  I wished I'd had more time...  there were quite a few other gardens in the area which were open with the proceeds going to the charities that the ngs support.https://www.ngs.org.uk/(and apparently there is also tea and cake)Ealing in BloomNow I have heard of this but see fewer and fewer posters around.  The deadline for entering your garden, patio etc is 8th June.  You have to email or go to the library to get a form.https://www.ealingallotmentspartnership.co.uk/images/ealing-in-bloom/ealing-in-Bloom-2018-Poster.pdfPlease don't believe that it is so much easier to have a patio and pots because so many plants - if you choose the right ones ie not just the ones you fancy - will grow far better and will be less effort and less demanding growing in a garden than pots where you have to constantly keep on watering and feeding.  Have a look at the shrubs which grow well in gardens around you - and give a neighbour a hand when they become less mobile - please!  It will not only make our streets a lot more pleasant but will be good for the well-being of many.  

Philippa Bond ● 2520d1 Comments ● 2517d

From Detached Ealing House to Nine Flats?

Ealing Today reports plans to replace a house on St Stephens Road with 9 flats.  This is just one of a growing number of similar schemes across the borough.  Over the past 9 months, within less than a mile of one another in central Ealing similarly extravagant plans have been put in for 1 Westbury Road, 33 Amherst Road, 77 Madeley Road, 59 Eaton Rise, 107 St Stephens Road, 88 The Avenue and 98 Gordon Road - most of which lie in Conservation Areas. Every application has generated strong local opposition with angry letters, petitions, and threats of legal action. The picture seems similar in residential areas across the Borough.  Ealing’s planners used to refuse such proposals as being out of keeping with the area, and their decisions were usually supported by the Planning Inspectors. But things have drastically changed recently with little publicity. A draft New London Plan has set out to solve the capital’s housing shortage by imposing a target for Ealing to build 10,740 new homes on small sites (mainly back gardens) over the next 10 years. Why Ealing was given this target has not been explained, but the Borough does not seem to have objected to it. Similar boroughs to Ealing have far lower targets - Hounslow for instance is expected to build 6,800 homes, Richmond 6,340 and Hammersmith and Fulham just 2,980.There's been very little discussion of this new policy. What will people make of its impact on the places where they live and its affect on services like schools that are already overstretched?

Will French ● 2532d4 Comments ● 2522d

Woolworth's Facade

The latest proposal for regeneration of the old Woolworth's building in West Ealing is a truly dreadful piece of modern design that fails to preserve the much loved art-deco façade - one of the few remaining heritage assets in West Ealing, and an important landmark in our high street for almost 100 years. The façade should be preserved for future generations and should be sympathetically incorporated into any new design.The desire to destroy this heritage example conflicts with Policy 14 of the recently endorsed West Ealing Centre Neighbourhood Plan, is not supported by Historic England or the views of well over 1000 local people who have signed a petition in support of preservation. Application for the façade to be included in Ealing’s local heritage list was submitted in 2017 but no decision has yet been forthcoming from the Principal Conservation Officer and recent e-mails to the local authority remain unanswered. The proposal for up to 15 storeys is excessive and is completely out of keeping with the surrounding buildings, including the new West Ealing Islamic Centre. The proposal to reserve only 26 out of a total of 120 flats for social rent and the target of 35% affordable homes fails to meet both local authority targets and the aspirations of the London Plan. The proposed housing density also exceeds that specified in the London Plan. Objections to the planning application must be submitted before 8 June and can be posted on Ealing's Planning website for 96-102 Broadway,Ealing, W13. Anyone wishing to add their name to the preservation petition may also do so at www.wecnf.org

David Randles ● 2528d0 Comments ● 2528d

Barbara speake stage school and agency

If anybody is thinking of attending the Barbara speake stage school and agency please think carefully After being ignored for several weeks Miss Speake finally responded to my social worker. As you can see from the letter she states she is perfectly within her rights as an independent school to exclude a child if the parent is causing trouble.she describes what i have said as slander and that she had complaints about me over a long period of time, she also states a meeting which issues were raised and discussed and that i chose to pass on to other parents. Let me clarify a few things There is no mention of my daughter, she made it very clear she is an independent school and basically its her way or the high way, she also says parents complained about me and that i was a nuisance, if this is true why wasn't i informed that people had been talking about me in such a way that it was deemed so bad she had to expel my daughter. Miss speake is very good at speaking her mind and pulling people into the office and as i was on the school premises so much why didn't she do this? why did she listen to people and not talk to me directly after all i have know her and most of the teachers for over 20 years, This gets me onto my meeting with miss speak i chose to talk to her as a curtesy as i did respect her  and  I wanted to inform her about my withdrawal from the agency and the reasons for it and that i thought she should look into shereen the agent because i feel she ripped me off £70, i showed her all my paperwork as evidence and by her own admission she wasn't happy about the 800 casting app which shereen was promoting and as she was coming in for a meeting later that day she would bring it up with her.with regards to issues raised in the meeting it was only about the 800 casting app nothing more and yes i did tell people who asked because i didn't want anyone to be ripped off even though i was the only idiot to buy it.Miss speak has described what i have said as slander does she actually know what it means because everything i have said is the truth and if asked i have evidence to back EVERYTHING i have said up.Miss speak on the other hand uses her voice and people around her to say and do things to make her look good or even vanrable   Slander oral defamation, in which someone tells one or more persons an untruth about another which untruth will harm the reputation of the person so if anyone is causing Slander it is Miss Speak.

Tamara Armitage ● 2543d0 Comments ● 2543d

Tory Wipe Out in Ealing on 3rd May

Having made a throw away comment in another thread about the Conservatives losing all their seats in Ealing borough in the local elections I thought I'd take a closer look just to see if it was a real possibility. Having done so I have to say that it is and that the Conservatives will certainly have a low single figure number of councillors and maybe even a big fat zero. Amazing to think that within the last decade they controlled the Council. I'm not saying that this is a good thing - in fact Council's overly dominated by one party don't tend to be particularly well run. Some very good and diligent councillors look set to lose their seats.On a ward by ward basis if you take Cleveland, Ealing Common and Northfield ward the national and London-wide swing against the party makes it very unlikely they will hold onto any of the seats there as their margin is small. One exception might be David Millican's seat in Northfield where is high personal vote combined with three opposition parties all thinking they have a chance might allow him to hang on.The two Tory 'safe' wards of Hanger Hill and Ealing Broadway present a real problem for them. They had the second and fourth highest percentage votes in the borough for Remain both over 70% In addition they have an extremely high proportion of EU citizens from other countries - 19.3% and 18.0% respectively as of the 2011 census. EU citizens can vote and the number resident will have gone up substantially over the last seven years. If they hang on in these wards it will be because the opposition vote is split three ways.

Andy Jones ● 2568d45 Comments ● 2550d

Gold Ring Scam

I'd originally intended to post on here to theeffect "If anyone has lost a gold ring comingout of South Ealing Station then they'd be out of luck. As their ring had been found by some chap who clearly had no intention of handingit in. In fact he tried to sell it to me"However only afterwards did it occur to me that it was all a scam. Which it was. The same scam was/is quite common in Paris. As Google will confirm. Maybe its common in London as well andI should get out more. Anyway.I was walking along outside the Park opposite SouthEaling Station and it just so happened that this chapwalking in front of me bent down and apparently picked up a gold ring lying on the pavement. "Its not gold " I said to him without thinking. He immediately engaged me in conversation in broken English and was inmmediately able to make out the 375 engraved on the inside. (Now what'sthe chance of that happening as Harry Hill would say) When I suggested he hand it in Sainsburys he said he had no money and would I give him some money for the ring.Still not having "fallen in" at this stage I myselfgave him a sob story about how the person who'dlost the ring might have no money either. If I had too much time on my hands it might be entertaining to follow him around and watch him in action. In my opinion anyone who buys a "goldring" in such circumstances deserves all they get, as if it really is lost as they believe then theyare profiting from someone else's misfortune.michael adams    

Michael Adams ● 2582d10 Comments ● 2579d

THE SORRY STATE OF EALING PLANNING DEPARTMENT

The Ealing Planning Department is, to my mind, in serious disarray.  How many of you have experienced, directly or indirectly, evidence of its failures and shortcomings?  I attended a meeting on 19 October '16.   It considered two applications (items 02 and 03 on the agenda) in respect of a building that has been a neighbourhood problem for years now and still known by its former name as the Royal Crimea Guest House.  As you know, the public must be given access to all documents relating to planning applications. In the case of these applications not only was the public not fully briefed,  neither was the Council's own Planning Committee! I was amazed that the meeting went ahead and considered these applications despite these serious shortcomings and even more surprised that the minutes of the meeting make no mention of them. Please read through what follows and ask yourselves if Ealing Planning is giving us a responsible and honest service.What occurred was yet another disgrace for the Planning Department.  The Chairman of the Planning Committee conducted the meeting impartially in firm but friendly fashion, but went out of his way to rebuke Planning and that rebuke should have been recorded in the minutes. I remember very clearly the Chairman saying  that this had 'not been Planning's finest hour' : Planning had failed to provide briefing papers to  members of the committee on time. One of the Planning Officers made a mistake in his presentation of item 02 which the chairman had to correct. The minutes correctly record the Chair querying why 25 documents were added to one of the applications at the last minute, but omit the Chairman's imputation that Planning had been slovenly and too last minute in its presentation which had therefore given insufficient time for members to reflect on the issues before them.Even worse was the announcement that one of the applications had been altered,  a quick-fix, arranged, it would seem, on the morning of the site-visit a few days before, that denied the public any chance to voice an opinion. A committee member asked about the legality of accepting this last-minute change to the application. He was inadequately answered by a legal officer not introduced by name at the meeting and not named in the minutes. This was something which should have been voted on but was not.  None of this is reflected in the minutes.It is odd that the minutes give the names of councillors and of Mr W.Taylor who addressed the committee on behalf of residents but not the name of all of the planning officers involved!  It is not surprising when Planning is given the protection of anonymity that it fails to do its job to acceptable standards. The minutes, in effect, sanitise Planning when they should have recorded its shortcomings as a matter of public record and to act as a reminder to Planning to improve its performance. It appears to have deteriorated over the last six or more months which is extraordinary given what it was already like.Let's see if the Committee approve the minutes of this meeting (October 19, 2016) at its next meeting on November 16 as a true and accurate record of what occurred.

vincent paul WRIGLEY ● 3088d12 Comments ● 2601d