Forum Topic

Walpole cafe and PMGT

Further to PMGT’s response to Ealing today’s article on my cafe. I would like to respond:-I  would like to correct a few inaccuracies in PMGT’s statement to you.Firstly, neither PMGT or the council kept me informed that the operation of my cafe was going out to tender imminently. In fact, I received a telephone call from Chris Bunting from Ealing Council telling me the cafe was going out to tender and I would hear from PMGT in the next few days via email.  Accordingly the tender request came through a couple of days after this call on 3rd October. I immediately contacted Vivienne Cane- Honeysett one of the trustees who frequents the cafe, expressing my distress and shoddy treatment , as I had been running the cafe for nine years. I heard nothing back from either Vivienne or PMGT Trustees. You will appreciate from this, my invitation to tender was certainly not warm as PMGT state and no consideration was afforded me as a loyal proprietor that has supported both the council and PMGT through their extensive building programme. Can I make it clear I have been providing a good and constant service since I opened in 2009 in the old wooden cafe before it was demolished. PMGT state that we closed during this time, on the contrary we remained open throughout until the Rickyard cafe was built.We operated from a portacabin for nearly two years due to building works overrunning at the Rickyard centre. We never complained  and worked with the council to facilitate our move to the Rickyard  building. I have chosen to place this in the public domain,  because of how PMGT have handled this matter and also because I have been so encouraged by the local community and our supportive and fantastic customers.PMGT claim this is in the best interests of the wider Ealing community, but the community have not been consulted and there has been no transparency or involvement from any of the local community groups. This is why in less than 24 hours nearly 2,000 local people have signed our online petition in protest at PMGT’s proposed actions and treatment of a loyal small family run business.I am expected to walk away from a business that I have nurtured for nine years at great investment in both time and money and hand my business to a new operator. I would suspect it will be a large chain that will also take on the new garden restaurant at the front of the Manor House.  I am not sure that PMGT understands  what is actually in the best interests of the wider community, If they did they would consult and involve the community as a whole and ascertain exactly what the community want for their cafe. They have failed to do this. Alan Dillon

Alan Dillon ● 2928d36 Comments

Alan,Did you factor in "goodwill" into your bid and did the council factor in "goodwill" into the process?"Goodwill" is actually am accounting/business/banking term that sets a monetary value on the ability of a business to achieve its business (and hence monetary) goals and sets out to include the intangibles such as the accrued customer base, the "goodwill" with which that customer base views the business in terms of how well the customers, suppliers, and others, view the company which translates into its success.It is not unusual to increasre the the "book" value of a business by ten or twenty percent due to its "goodwill". It has even been known to double the value of a business.Was this factored into your bid? Did the council take "goodwill" in assessing you bid? These are legitimate questions that you could be putting into the scrutiny and appeal process. Politicans get "golden parachutes" when they lose an election after serving multiple terms in Parliament so why should the council not provide you with the same? You have served the community and council well over the years and is that not cause enough for some kind of pay off?Anyway, I think this contract should be examined and scrutinised (if necessary by independent auditors) to see if the decision was wise in terms of "goodwill".There is the council's Scrutiny Commitee, could not this be "called in" for review?Certainly the ombudsman is not out of the question, though remember the ombudsman deals with whether the process was followed correctly, not in whether the decision was necessarily right or wrong.To take this to the ombudsman you need to follow the council process before referring it upwards and this means making complaints to the council in writing.Write to the Chief Executive, copy in your local councillors and MPs, DATE and SIGN the letter or the council has no obligation to actually respond. E-mail it in and send it by recorded delivery (don't lose the receipt) or take it to the council offices (get a receipt AT THE DESK - you may need to provide your own form which they then stamp). Also, talk to the ombudsman's office too, while it cannot accept a complaint until the full council process has been exhausted it can advise you on how to proceed and "how" to structure the process so that they can take over if the council fails.Phew, I hope that is of some use.Remember, "Goodwill", that may be enough to open the door a crack into a review of this process.I am truly fed up with the council's preceived necessity to award contracts to the operators who cannot deliver on the (usually) absurdly low bid and have been shown to be unable to do so in other similar contracts (lack "goodwill").

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2901d