Forum Topic

Thankfully Boris Johnson moves away from 'mitigation'-based herd immunity strategy to 'suppression'https://news.sky.com/story/coronavirus-govt-ramped-up-measures-after-new-prediction-of-250-000-deaths-11958680 Coronavirus: PM shifts towards 'suppression' after new analysis of coronavirus death rateSky News understands the UK shifted to tougher measures on Monday partly as a result of the document produced by experts.Greg Heffer, political reporterGreg HefferThe government ramped up measures against the coronavirus epidemic following new predictions that the UK could otherwise have seen 250,000 deaths.A new document published by the COVID-19 team at London's Imperial College - which is advising the government on its coronavirus response - warns the current public health threat is the "most serious" from a respiratory virus since the Spanish Flu in 1918.They advised the UK adopts a strategy of "epidemic suppression" - for a period of potentially 18 months or more - rather than "mitigation".Coronavirus: What do mitigation and suppression mean?Coronavirus: What do mitigation and suppression mean?Modelling of the "most effective" mitigation strategy examined had revealed that NHS capacities could be exceeded by at least eightfold - and about 250,000 people could die.The Imperial team described the suppression of the coronavirus outbreak as "the only viable strategy at the current time" - even if the "social and economic effects of the measures which are needed to achieve this policy goal will be profound".They said: "Many countries have adopted such measures already, but even those countries at an earlier stage of their epidemic [such as the UK] will need to do so imminently."On Monday, Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced a significant escalation of UK measures in response to coronavirus, including advising everyone in the country to avoid pubs, clubs, restaurants and theatres and to only make essential journeys.Sky News understands the government shifted to tougher measures on Monday partly as a result of the document produced by the team at Imperial.The Imperial team described "mitigation" as focusing on "slowing but not necessarily stopping epidemic spread" to reduce NHS demand at the peak of an outbreak.By contrast, "suppression" aims to "reverse epidemic growth, reducing case numbers to low levels and maintaining that situation indefinitely".Suppression measures would require social distancing by the "entire population" with "home isolation of cases and household quarantine of their family members" as well as possible school closures, according to the document.Such measures will need to be maintained until a COVID-19 vaccine becomes available - a period of potentially 18 months or more, the team said.They added: "For suppression, early action is important, and interventions need to be in place well before healthcare capacity is overwhelmed."However, the team warned it is "not at all certain that suppression will succeed long term" as "no public health intervention with such disruptive effects on society has been previously attempted for such a long duration of time".The document added: "How populations and societies will respond remains unclear."Having based their findings on health service demand levels in China, Italy and the UK, the Imperial team only reached their conclusions "in the last few days".In their examination of the "most effective mitigation strategy", they concluded: "The surge limits for both general ward and ICU [intensive care unit] beds would be exceeded by at least eightfold under the more optimistic scenario for critical care requirements that we examined."In addition, even if all patients were able to be treated, we predict there would still be in the order of 250,000 deaths in GB, and 1.1 to 1.2 million in the US."A government spokesperson said: "This is a very fast-moving situation."In order to give the most robust scientific advice SAGE [the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies] draws upon and considers a range of evidence and views to reach its recommendations."Part of this evidence includes the latest modelling data from a number of experts."All SAGE recommendations are in line with the best current evidence. We will be publishing further evidence shortly."

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2210d

Rosco, my comment about Boris' marbles is about the "herd immunity" approach, MANY would die for this to happen. And arguably many more than if we locked-down completely like in  Wuhan, China, and in other European countries as well. The quarantine of elderly and vulnerable people I see as a utilitarian approach that will save the most elderly and vulnerable people.I don't know how to put this gently,  there are 4,000 ventilators in the U.K (most of them in use already). The most at risk group of dying from this virus are the over seventies. If there is a general ourbreak as is prophesied they will need a lot more thatn 4,000 ventilators as ten percent of people developing the virus need one to survive, those most likley to need this support are elderly. There just would not be enough support available to save everyone. By getting the elderly to stay at home MANY more elderly probably survive. By defering the spread of the illness more people get treated over a longer time period (including the elderly). It is not "anti-elderly", it is actually helpful.The disease has a much more profound effect on the elederly and the vulnerable (diabetes, hyoertension) so reducing the numbers of these exposed means that there are fewer ill at any one time and hence there is more chance of the, getting treatment over a longer period of time rather than if there is a deluge of hundreds of thousands of cases at one go. Most of the younger people will recover having had  a "flu-like illness", most of the elederly cases will not, unless given ventilator-supported hospital ICU care, of which we don't have enough of.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2211d

The Guardian Newspaper TodayWHO urges countries to 'track and trace' every Covid-19 caseAdvice comes day after UK decides to stop community tests and only test hospital casesSarah Boseley Health editorFri 13 Mar 2020 18.13 GMTLast modified on Fri 13 Mar 2020 18.44 GMTCountries should find and test every case of coronavirus to stop the pandemic, the World Health Organization has said a day after the UK announced that only the most seriously ill will be tested.“You can’t fight a virus if you don’t know where it is,” the WHO’s director general, Dr Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, said at a briefing on Friday. “Find, isolate, test and treat every case to break the chains of Covid transmission. Every case we find and treat limits the expansion of the disease.”The UK government said on Thursday that it would no longer try to “track and trace” everyone suspected of having the virus. Instead, under plans outlined by Boris Johnson and his medical and scientific advisers, testing would be limited to patients in hospital with serious breathing problems, which may be caused by coronavirus but could also be because of flu. Isolation at home would be a voluntary measure, but anyone with a persistent cough or temperature would be asked to do so.The prime minister’s briefing, which followed an emergency Cobra meeting, also marked a sudden and significant U-turn in NHS policy. Just a day earlier NHS England had announced an increase in testing in the community. A “significant expansion of coronavirus testing, with enhanced labs” would help the health service carry out 10,000 tests a day, it said.However, after the WHO declared coronavirus a pandemic, the government moved the UK from the “containment” phase into “delay”, accepting the inevitability of millions of infections. This also moved the testing strategy to one where people are no longer tested, but anyone with a temperature or a continuous cough is advised to stay home for seven days, to reduce the number of people they will infect.People with symptoms are not even advised to call NHS 111, but look at the online advice. The only time to seek medical help is if they get worse, not better.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2214d