Forum Topic

Proposed Uxbridge Road Cycling Measures

I don't travel along this stretch of the Uxbridge Road regularly enough to comment on the proposals which are detailed on the front page with any great authority but the thinking behind them appears sound. It is certainly the case that if you are going to be delayed on this road it will be in the town centres and therefore it doesn't seem to be too unbelievable that the dual carriageways represent spare capacity that can be better used and there is a big win if cycling can be made safer and quicker. It was interesting to learn that 80% of trips along this road are made by bus — presumably this is on a per person basis. What that means is that these changes could go badly wrong if they have an undue impact on bus travel times. The council seem to be saying that the changes will be scrapped if bus travel times are affected 'significantly' but this is not defined. My concern is that the more zealous of the pro-cycling brigade have often tended to quote quite misleading data when it comes to bus travel times when it comes to the recent Streetspace measures. We've seen statistics for whole routes for the whole day and then been told that any delays were minimal. The key data is for travel times within the affected sector of the route during the busiest parts of the day. A five minute delay in rush hour might be evened out over the course of the whole route but that is irrelevant to a bus user who has already got off. On a 20 minute trip that's a 25% increase in travel time which will encourage modal shift. As anyone who has ever used a bus can tell you, relatively short delays can lead to buses becoming very overcrowded very quickly. If the changes make travel slower and less comfortable for 80% of the users of the route then they are going to switch to other modes of transport but not all will take up cycling and many will use cars. In this case you risk the situation entering a vicious cycle — pun not intended — in which more traffic leads to fewer people using the bus. To avoid this the council needs to accurately survey the opinions of bus users and drivers and treat the data honestly not cherry picking to present an argument for a pre-determined course of action.



Gordon Southwell ● 1029d56 Comments

This conversation has wondered off the point of the change of lane use on the Uxbridge Road to personal name calling. To bring the discussion back to the original point, it is blindingly obvious that restricting cars to only one lane on this stretch of road will create additional delays – THIS IS THE WHOLE POINT! This is part of a raft of measures taken specifically to reduce car use – the council, Mayor etc. have been relatively clear about this. The measures aren’t particularly pro-cycling – any benefits to cyclists will be purely coincidental. As a previous poster pointed out, there is already more than enough capacity for safe cycling on this section of road – if riders don’t want to use the bus lane, they will use the pavement, and will continue to do so even after the dedicated cycle lane has been created. We can see this in other sections of road, such as that alongside West Middlesex Hospital – the wanded-off lane seldom has any bikes on it. Restricting lane capacity westbound will mean that traffic intending to go straight on into Southall will be in the same lane as traffic intending to turn left down Windmill Lane – any hold-ups on either road will affect ALL westbound traffic. Any fool can see that these proposals will create a massive bottleneck. And don’t count on the “consultation” having any effect on the proposals – this will be ignored as have all previous ones. The decision has been made and the change will go ahead – the contractors will already have been booked and the permits applied for. It’s happening, and it will be horrible.

Graham Thorpe ● 1021d