Forum Topic

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads backed up.

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Bernard Allen ● 1653d19 Comments

61 years on the planet and I have felt more in imminent danger of injury from cyclists on pavements over that time than I ever have from motorists - who, incidentally, can almost never be found 'motoring' on pavements.In fact, I can add motorcycles and mobility scooters (and now every increasingly those damned electric scooter things) to this list as well - all ahead of cars.Yes, some drivers can be very inconsiderate parkers indeed but in terms of representing an existential threat of unexpected injury whilst using a pavement they are way down the list.When our kids were younger I was in the habit of forcibly bringing pavement riding cyclists to an abrupt halt by standing across the pavement with my arms out and then lecturing them about the danger that they represented to my children.  Needless to say, this was never appreciated.  It was only the influence of my far more sensible wife that stopped me jamming my umbrella into their spokes as they went by.I do not of course include very small children riding on the pavement under the guidance of parents in this.Our house is close to a road barrier and until this was rebuilt to be "porous" to them last year, cyclists, including motorcyclists, would simply mount the pavement with impunity and at speed courtesy of the absence of kerb and nice ramp affording them easy access from the pavement frontage of the adjacent commercial premises.  This was absolutely lethal to anybody joining the pavement from our house, obscured as we are by a six foot brick wall as we do so.  Cyclists have collided with me twice over the years.  Luckily I have been unhurt.  On both occasions the idiots concerned somehow expected me to be sympathetic towards the injuries they incurred as they hit the deck hard as a result of bouncing off me.  Personally, I was happy to just leave them lying in their own blood with a few choice epitaphs from me ringing in their ears. Once I was quick witted enough to fend off a motorcyclist who would have hit me if I had not.  Apparently, he also thought that the damage to him and his machine was my fault.  My reply was (and remains) unprintable.

Tony Colliver ● 1629d

I received this last night, after the shambles of the Zoom Ealing Council meeting:Good evening,My thanks for your communication to me regarding the coronavirus imposed low traffic neighbourhoods in Ealing. I am a great believer in walking and cycling and more pleasant streets for us all but do have reservations about the situation that has arisen with the local schemes including democratic oversight and their divisive nature that seems to have seen communities split along cyclist v. motorist lines when many of us are both.These far-reaching changes which were dramatically introduced with no prior consultation which has raised eyebrows. Whilst I am myself a near-daily cyclist I am a great believer in evidence-led policy and something seemingly imposed with no traffic survey or clear rationale as to why the streets that were chosen were selected seems for me raises numerous questions.While other London boroughs have reined in their schemes to curb aspects which were not working (and in one case abolished it altogether) it seems from all the conversations I have had locally our council has no appetite to amend anything until the sixth month live trial is over in which time they believe the necessary behaviour changes to drive a modal shift from cars to “active travel” will occur.For me what happens next is crucial. I wrote to the council on 10th September setting out a number of questions on the basis of the trail and how its success/ failure would be judged which can be read here: https://www.rupahuq.org.uk/2020/09/14/rupa-huq-mp-seeks-clarity-on-low-traffic-neighbourhoods-from-ealing-council/ The reply received can be read here https://www.facebook.com/rupa4labour/posts/2896728257227528I find aspects of this concerning – that the council cabinet who are unashamedly if not evangelically in favour will decide the scheme’s fate to me seems to open the possibility for skewed conclusions when objective data is needed to reach this decision.I believe that these schemes can work where there is a need for traffic calming. However putting in measures in already quiet streets simply because a budget existed, not for any real need to address a pre-existing problem is to my mind wrong and a large number of unintended consequences of these schemes – more pollution and huge traffic problems for residential properties on main roads – have unfolded which need addressing.I have already discussed this issue with Grant Shapps Secretary of State for Transport and in light of his weekend remarks in the Telegraph that the instigators or such schemes need take residents with them not alienate I am seeking further clarification on the oversight of these schemes.I understand that there is a council meeting this evening. I wont be there but imagine little will change. I urge you to write to your ward representatives and leader of the council Julian Bell to make your voice heard.My thanks again to you for writing to me on this important issue. I hope you and yours are keeping well at this unprecedented time. Yours sincerely,Rupa Dr Rupa HuqMember of Parliament for Ealing Central and ActonHouse of CommonsLondonSW1A 0AA

Tania Bapuji ● 1650d