Forum Topic

Council proposes draconian clampdown on car owners

Be very afraid if you need a car to go about your business in Ealing. Latest proposals from the lunatics in the Town Hall will see free stop and shop scrapped, radical increases in CPZ operation (which will affect visitors arriving by car), and a raft of other anti-car ideas. Of course this is all based on the presumption that everyone has a) the time to walk or cycle or take public transport for everything they do away from home; b) everyone lives within easy walking/cycling distance of shops and services and c) nobody needs to take small children and/or heavy shopping anywhere.No doubt it will please the mouth-foamers who view all car use as evil but this is going to kill a lot of small businesses in areas such as Northfields and simply make life impossible for a large number of people. How ironic that this is the same council so committed to easy access to things it wants to shut all the local libraries to which most people.....walk! Morons.You can see the draft proposals at https://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=%2fDTc9rYgKb92hbpqUaP%2bqgqnE6W4RcF0RKePDrcv9hWnhQpP5iiVPA%3d%3d&rUzwRPf%2bZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3d%3d=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2fLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3d%3d&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&kCx1AnS9%2fpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2bAJvYtyA%3d%3d=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&FgPlIEJYlotS%2bYGoBi5olA%3d%3d=NHdURQburHA%3d&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3d

Simon Hayes ● 2582d24 Comments

There’s a very arrogant presumption about how people should behave. In an ideal world we would all have everything we need within five minutes walk from our front doors. The reality is somewhat different.As I said in a previous post no consideration has been given to how local shops are used by customers. They are for convenience and parades such as the one on South Ealing Road or Northfield Avenue don’t have the array of shops and services to make them destinations in the way that Ealing Broadway is. Thus passing trade from drivers forms an essential component on which these shops survive.If someone knows they will have to walk for 20 minutes to visit a shop for three minutes and then have another 20 minute walk home again they simply won’t bother, especially if the weather is bad. The exception is if you are going somewhere for an appointment, a dentist for example, where the time spent at the destination is longer. The same applies to a local library where browsing is an important element of the offer. Nobody spends half an hour browsing in a newsagents.What strikes me about the arguments put forward for scrapping stop and shop is how it’s weighted towards the idea that people abuse the system and park longer than allowed. Surely that’s an enforcement problem, resolved by allocating more wardens or putting up cameras to record arrival times. Making people pay for short stop parking will be counter-productive and will hit small traders hard.By the way, a grand total of 467 people responded to this consultation. Still no information about what they said.

Simon Hayes ● 2578d

The law on implementing CPZs is pretty clear. They are a traffic management tool for improving access for residents. They are not designed to raise revenue.The mischief here, apart from the non consultation, is that the Council is effectively discriminating against a proportion of the population who live here, namely car owners who have no option but to pay for a permit. Fine, you might get some who decide to ‘ditch their dirty vehicles’ as the council so eloquently put it, but that’s not an option for many people. Nor is spending huge amounts on an electric vehicle (and they have their own issues which I won’t go into here).What these measures won’t do is provide any incentive for car owners who don’t live in a CPZ to make a ‘modal shift’ to other forms of transport. Take a look at the kinds of vehicles parked on many drives and you’ll see how many are very big diesel driven ones.These measures will do zero to tackle the main cause of pollution in the borough, the vast volumes of through traffic using main arterial routes like the A40 and A406. Those are TfL controlled roads outside the remit of the council.I also wonder how many of our Labour councillors drive dirty polluting cars, or have they decided to set an example for us to follow and ditched them?I suspect what the Council would like to do is put a congestion charge in the borough but they know full well that would be political suicide.A lot of the traffic clogging our streets is delivery vans, as the council acknowledges. Perhaps you internet shopping addicts should think more carefully about how your latest purchase gets to you.You might be quite surprised to see how little traffic there is in much of the borough during the day. Outside peak hours in the morning and evening the traffic is light, most roads are quiet.And I still don’t think it’s Khan or Bell’s place to dictate to me how I should get around. I walk when I can but that’s not always practical or possible. And closing the local library will mean one less place to walk to.

Simon Hayes ● 2578d

So it transpires that the Council carried out a laughable consultation on a policy that will have a massive impact right across the borough, potentially crippling businesses, cutting down road space and spending huge amounts of money on cycling infrastructure.It ran the consultation for one month, ending on December 7. The only information given about it in Around Ealing was a small paragraph at the foot of page 8 in December’s edition. A bit late for a lot of people who would simply not have seen it.Interestingly the details of the consultation have not been put on the past consultations page of the council website, even though other ones carried out at similar time are.A cynic might say that the Council merely paid lip service to the idea of a consultation to tick a legal box. It may be they had no responses.This plan will potentially see a red route put on Uxbridge Road, changes to parking availability near schools and shops, the imposition of controlled parking zones in new areas, an increase in permit fees in existing CPZs, the building of cycle lanes on main routes and the roll out of electric charging points across the borough.That’s a lot of information affecting lots of stakeholders yet the consultation only ran for a month. The library consultation is lasting three months and includes public meetings.This is a serious abuse of power by the council. Consultation is not an exercise of validation for a decision that’s already been made. It is to listen to the views of people who may be affected and should be considered before the decision is made.Democracy in Ealing under Julian Bell is dead.

Simon Hayes ● 2579d