Forum Topic

Equality Trust Pledge - Where are the Torys?

The Equality Trust was founded in 2009 to examine the effects of inequality on society and, following the significant findings, is now funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Great inequality is the scourge of modern societies. The Equality Trust has provided the evidence on each of eleven different health and social problems: physical health, mental health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community life, violence, teenage births, and child well-being. For all eleven of these health and social problems, outcomes are very substantially worse in more unequal societies. They have also checked the relationships wherever possible in two independent test beds: internationally among the rich countries, and then again among the 50 states of the USA. In almost every case they have found the same tendency for outcomes to be much worse in more unequal societies in both settings.During this election period the Trust has asked parliamentary and local council candidates to show they're committed to reducing income inequality by signing the following statement:"Compelling new evidence presented by The Equality Trust shows that more equal societies - those with a narrower gap between rich and poor – are more cohesive, healthier, suffer fewer social problems and are more environmentally sustainable. In view of these findings I am committed to making the UK a more equal society as the most effective means of building a better society. I will therefore actively support the case for policies designed to narrow the gap between rich and poor; and engage with the debate on which measures should be implemented to achieve that aim."The 290 pledges given so far (Sat 10th) give us an interesting picture. The percentages by party I have discovered are: Green Party: 36%Liberal Democrats: 32%Labour: 21%Conservative: 7%Other: 4%Readers can draw their own conclusions from this and some candidates may say that they were unaware of the pledge which is in any case telling.The question for me is if so few conservatives are unaware or unwilling to make this pledge how can the Tory’s “Big Society” idea really be the panacea that David 's Cameron talks about?However I do welcome the upper limit for the public sector announced by the Tory at 20 times that of the lowest paid. However, if this is to have any real impact (20 times has little impact) it should be set at 10 times as set by the Greens for both the private and public sectors. To my mind the “Big Society” can only succeed without the “Great Inequality”.http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/ C BRYANhttp://conradbryan.blogspot.com/

Conrad Bryan ● 5824d27 Comments

Sam Akaki, the independent candidate for ‘Independent Ealing and Acton Communities for Public Services’ is the only one who has the right ideas on how to tackle inequality in Ealing & Acton. Why?According to the Libdems, Labour and the Conservatives (LibLabCons!), inequality is all about the differences in the amount of money in our pockets and bank balance figures. To that extent, the argument goes; the problem can be rectified by giving miserable increases in weekly benefits and tax credits. Clearly, the issue of inequality, like other social policy issues, has become a political football to be kicked around by the main parties for short term electoral advantages. No wonder inequality has been increasing.‘Independent Ealing and Acton Communities for Public Services’ strongly believe that real inequality is in our abilities or lack of abilities to access quality public services including housing, education, health-care, transport, provisions for young families, well-paid jobs, care for older and other vulnerable people.  These cannot be solved by giving more weekly benefits and tax credits.  They need strategic long-term planning, involving local communities.For example, while canvassing in South Acton estate, the local residents gave me a catalogue of problems including old and inhabitable tower blocks, insufficient health and safety facilities, poor transport, drug and alcohol misuse, overcrowding, boarded-up flats, and thousands of young men who were not in education, training or employment (NEAT). I was informed that these problems had been accumulating since the last Tory government, which used to blame the poor for their poverty!Today, Mr David Freud, the author of Labour’s controversial welfare reforms, has become an advisor to the Tories, having defected to them last year, carrying his file along.  No wonder that Labour and the Tories’ welfare policies are the same!Even if their policies were different, the Labour, Tory and Libdem candidates would not be able to do much, if anything about inequality in Ealing and Acton, if they were elected.  The Three-Line Whip system which is used by all the parties will compel them to speak and vote the way their parties want, not way you want.  Moreover, their powerful corporate and non-domicile funders (The Trade Unions, big businesses, Lord Ashcroft and Lord Paul, Michael Brown for the Libdems etc) will certainly expect them vote in a particular way, if only to pay back the money that was used to support their campaigns. After all, he who pays the piper calls the tune!In other words, the Labour, Conservative and Libdem candidate are nothing more than the local agents of vested interest.  Consequently, a vote for the “LibLabCons” will be a wasted vote that will do nothing to address inequality in Ealing and Acton.By contrast, with no party Whip or millionaire funders to influence my actions, I will freely speak and vote with other independent-minded MPs to tackle inequality in Ealing and Acton.My vote will become even more critical in the event of a hung parliament.  It will be the magic vote that will carry or sink any Bill, depending on how it affects efforts to reduce inequality.Finally, it is worthy to note that I was effectively and Apprentice MP from January 2010 until March 2010 when I resigned my post as a parliamentary Officer to contest this election.  I will be ready to participate in the legislative processes from day one, if election.Meanwhile, I will leave you with this inequality-focused tune ‘Remake the World’ by Jimmy Cliff.  It goes: “Too many people are suffering; too many people are sad; too little people have everything; while too many people got nothing - put your conscience to the test;  get racism out of your sight - be you black, be you white - let us remake the world", You could be forgiven for thinking that Jimmy Cliff had today’s South Acton and West Ealing in mind when he wrote song over 30 years ago! Please listen to the tune on my campaign websitehttp://www.ealingactoncommunity.com/wp/?cat=23

Sam Akaki ● 5821d

On the narrow point of results which flow from signing pledges.What is a pledge and how does it differ from a petition and from a political policy which in this thread is a fundamental one.In the context of this thread, in all cases I consider that an advocate or signatory is trying to put a viewpoint across in an endeavour to persuade.So I find it quite astonishing that it is not the Tory thing to sign pledges on the extremely spurious grounds that it doesn’t do any thing in itself. How much more stupid can our local Tory politicians get?  In the first place how absurd is it that the act of signing pledges has now got to be politicised. In the second place if signing pledges doesn’t do much then it raises the question as to whether two of our local Tory cabinet members give a toss about local opinion when it is presented to them by a lot of residents making a point of view. Arcadia being the best example just at the moment. Thirdly is the local Tory manifesto (full of pledges) worth the paper it is written on – when the grapevine tells us that very very significant cuts are being talked about in the Council.Their comments on this thread as regards their attitude to pledges is enough too make any intelligent person of any political hue feel that such an attitude should be avoided like the plague. It suggests that such people want power but do not wish to be representatives of the people – but just representatives of a minority. So, stuff freedom of speech.Endless national politicians make pledges. Cameron has pledged that the NHS will be safe. Yet two senior local Tory twits think pledges do not do much. Pledges in this context are about making statements in which they hope the populace will place trust. We now even better evidence locally that trust is cheap – at least so far as Tories are concerned.

George Knox ● 5822d

ConradAs a Tory I have to agree with Phil; we don’t tend to sign pledges because it does not do anything in itself. You adopt the typical leftie tactic and producing a motion that sounds well meaning and then accuse Tories of in some way being nasty because they don’t sign it. Anyone could sign this pledge as on one level it’s just motherhood and apple pie, but that’s not making any real change. At a deeper level it has a very clear left wing agenda."Compelling new evidence presented by The Equality Trust shows that more equal societies - those with a narrower gap between rich and poor – are more cohesive, healthier, suffer fewer social problems and are more environmentally sustainable”. This evidence fails to show cause and effect – does inequality result in social problems or do problems (such as poor education, crime, poor health) cause inequality? It does not identify why inequality arises. The evidence presented on the website is hardly convincing; it is acknowledged, for example, that there’s no significant statistical correlation between inequality and life expectancy or mental health (see http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/why/evidence/frequently-asked-questions#causality). As someone with a bit of statistical training I would question that most of the claimed ‘significant’ correlations are really strong enough to justify that description. “In view of these findings I am committed to making the UK a more equal society as the most effective means of building a better society”. Clearly this means equality of outcome rather than equality of opportunity. How much more equal? Is there an optimal level of equality? And why is equality of outcome more important than equality of opportunity?“I will therefore actively support the case for policies designed to narrow the gap between rich and poor; and engage with the debate on which measures should be implemented to achieve that aim." What policies – redistribution of wealth through taxation?This is a complicated subject which deserves better than a simplistic motion like this.And the website just reads like a plug for the book.

Vlod Barchuk ● 5822d

Phil,Thanks for the links. However I think you will find this book really useful: The Spirit Level by Richard Wilkinson and Kate Pickett.I have to say you seem to have taken a very narrow view of inequality when you take Education as your primary solution. Yes I agree this is an important aspect (and thanks for highlighting the Green education policies,) but there are more fundamental areas of inequality that need to be addressed by all parties such as women continuing to receive lower pay than men in equivalent jobs, such as the widening pay gap in the private sector, such as health inequalities and the list goes on. Education on its own is not the silver bullet you seem to be suggesting, we need to see a broad range of policies from all parties to address this issue. I can see David Cameron has attempted to address a tiny piece of this by looking at public sector pay and I welcome this but it doesn’t go far enough and why does he address this only in the public sector? You mentioned that it’s not a Tory thing to sign these sort of pledges (this statement came as a real surprise and disappointment as I think all parties should sign it), so why has Zac Goldsmith, your candidate in Richmond Park signed it and several other conservatives around the country, clearly some people in your party believe in the Equality Pledge.  By the way Phil, I like the Big Society idea but I really don’t see how this can work when we have such inequalities in society and the resulting lack of trust. I think the inequality issues need to be addressed first and the big society movement will naturally follow.

Conrad Bryan ● 5823d