Forum Topic

Just over twenty years ago one of the first CPZs was installed near my home. The next thing I knew was that our road from being empty became full of parked vehicles. That happened suddenly without warning or consultation. I protested,"All affected should be consulted!". "You were consulted was the reply. The Traffic Orders were published in the Gazette. You are supposed to read them", went the official council rebuttal. After that I started to read all the notices in the Gazette and attend council meetings. One I remember clearly soon after that CPZ went live was when a trader spoke who ran the wholefood shop opposite St Mary's Church. As he spoke his wife next to him cried. He had to cease trading because his takings had dropped so much so quickly. It was after and because of this that stop and shop bays were introduced. In most places they work well. On the other hand there are all sorts of problems with these Council "proposals" (Please see them as done deals not as proposals) and others contained in the LIP document. They reflect all manner of things that are wrong or flawed in the thinking and logic of the transport department and the councillors who are involved. Anyone with an education would cry at the crafting of the LIP documents that went to cabinet) LIP stands for Local Implementation Plan. Some items say will happen and some are very vague. Beware the word trial. You think that means like a scientific trial. No, install it and leave it there, collect no data and lie if you have to. All have to be subject to consultation and that is where the problem lies. Officers like to very loosely and unfairly interpret consultation. My human rights training started when I was young. Saturday cinema. Native American Chief says, "White man speak with forked tongue". Keep that in mind.

Arthur Breens ● 2572d