GordonEaling Council is well aware of the boundaries it can push on the ‘legality’ of its public notices. It does the bare minimum because a lot of its plans are deeply unpopular.Let me provide an example. It created a draft Local Implementation Plan a couple of years ago. This was to have drastic impacts on many people in Ealing, not least local businesses and shops already under financial pressure. It proposed scrapping free stop and shop parking (under the guise of environmental concerns - ie stop people driving to local shops), as well as huge spending on cycling infrastructure projects that were of debatable merit.There was a statutory duty to consult with the public on this plan but there was precious little information available and next to no publicity. Apart from the piss poor Ealing News Extra sure, which very few visit regularly, there was only a tiny mention of it anywhere else: a small paragraph in the December 2018 Around Ealing magazine, published three days before consultation closed. Even that was just a post directing readers to a n online link, ignoring those who have no easy internet access but who might want their say.Some key ‘stakeholders’ (whoever they might be) were contacted by email but many realised the paucity of proper information meant they could not comment accurately on the proposals. Even enlisting the help of local councillors failed to illuminate the murky wording and simple lack of clear information in the consultation document.In fact the only people encouraged to comment positively were cycling lobbyists who stood to gain the most from multi million pound investment in bike lanes dns other paraphernalia to which they would pay nothing.Around 480 responses were received by the council. Pretty poor considering the many millions earmarked for spending under this plan. Most Ealing residents were blissfully unaware of anything contained within it. The first they would know would be when their free 30 minute parking disappeared, shortly followed by the small shops they have occasionally frequent.This is the standard mode of operation by this council. It did the same with increasing CPZ permit charges, with many drivers discovering their costs had doubled with little warning. Again, there was a ‘consultation’, but blink and you missed it.As a nation we are deeply imperilled by the march towards shackling a free and independent press. Dissent is not tolerated by the political class at any level, and many media outlets are running scared of losing lucrative advertising from local and national administrations. Hence the relentless reprinting of press releases in the pages of the Gazette and other ‘papers’.As has been evidenced since time immemorial it is foolish to believe for one moment that our leaders are beyond questioning, investigation or reproach. The billions spent on PR campaigns - and the current health crisis is no exception - should not blind anyone to repeated and often dangerous mistakes.
Simon Hayes ● 1826d