Forum Topic

Ealing Council Lying and misleading and manipulating again

So the Council who have denied any issues with emergency services and refuse crews or the increased costs on refuse services due to the LTN imposition, are now resorting to gadgets.So they are as anyone can see deeply flawed and playing with peoples lives.So now they are resorting to Parking data and and as ever mixing percentages whilst leaving out actual numbers.What constitutes a car from afar?  Parked in Northfields but register in South Ealing?What might be the nature of the occupant parked from afar?70% of parked cars are from other places?  Given the parking restrictions and how empty the streets are most of the time just how many vehicles is 70%50% are local -ish. Again How many vehicles is 50%/ It could be 1 car out of 2 or it could be 5 out of 10.You can crunch numbers in many ways but withholding the datum points and just publishing the figures is pure malevolent misleading.Rather like the figure of surveyed people carried out last December for LTN planningJust 126 people out of a district of several thousand and yet the % figures claim " A high percentage in support" A high percentage of invited and vetted residents and organisation members but barely a percentage of the actual local populous.Just how corrupt is this Authority revealing itself to be?

Raymond Havelock ● 2021d8 Comments

Yes.  First Najserak, who gained employment here having taken legal action to prevent his record with his former employer (Bolton) being revealed.  I wonder what kind of reference they wrote for him!  It can hardly have been an honest one. In correspondence with Najserak, I formed the opinion that he was lying.  It was then I checked his record. Then there are the three senior officers against whom I and 5 of my neighbours have made formal complaints, alleging that they are public liars.  Deputy Leader Johnson has been procrastinating in the matter of investigating the complaints for months.  The problem?  Between them the three control the complaints procedure. I have formed the opinion that lying is the default reaction for Ealing's senior officers, not least in order to save face or protect a colleague. If by mistake, Ealing one day employed on honest individual, they would be unable to behave honestly. In fact, usually honest junior officer get dragged into the lies of their superiors.Employees can only be as honest as the organisation they work for and doing an honest day's work for Ealing's Labour Council is about as possible as doing charity work for the Gestapo.  You remember the Gestapo:  they were anti-semitic.

Andrew Farmer ● 2016d

I think you have a VERY good point Mr Havelock.We are all aware of and suffering from the rotten politics at The Ealing Kremlin, but there also needs to be an urgent clearout of all the rotten Executives, Directors and Other Senior Management. They are all equally culpable.

Rosco White ● 2016d

So all the dismissals of what local people and professionals have said, many publicly on this forum and others ought now to be taken seriously by LBE.They are still trying to twist and manipulate.It will take a catastrophe ( which no-one wants to happen) and even then these idiots and their cohorts will still fid a way of being exonerated from culpability.That includes Executives like Taylor and co who feed at the trough but quietly push all this through as though butter would not melt in their mouths.  All those who promoted, planned and connived in secret to make this happen when it usually takes 6 months just to sweep a street must accept culpability and resign or step back from their actions along with this raft of deceiving politicians

Raymond Havelock ● 2016d

The council has admitted it DID NOT consult with London Ambulance Service about the LTN schemes. This is a direct contradiction to everything it has said to residents and the media for weeks.https://www.ealing.gov.uk/news/article/2034/statement_on_low_traffic_neighbourhoods?fbclid=IwAR000dBZjcIns6WGYFg19AKAeIYWAX6Zm8ZrfYkVgKft_ywrMnRlglbbCCs

Simon Hayes ● 2016d

Well, SOMEBODY keeps voting for BellEnd, and there were even MORE of them last time.Summit's fishy in Denmark?

Rosco White ● 2017d

I thought they had consulted with emergency services re barriers! Obviously not. What a waste of money! They have reverted to ANPR at great expense but of course it will be a revenue cash cow. Disgusting. Vote them out!

Elizabeth Price ● 2017d

Agreed it is a fairly flagrant misuse of a statistic. It also undermines their own policy - if such a high proportion of traffic is non-local, why not give exemption to residents from the ANPR enforcement?

Andy Jones ● 2020d

You can tell when a politician is lying as their mouth is moving, Bell is no different and one of the worst.VOTE HIM AND HIS CRONIES OUT FIRST CHANCEAs noted above one bare faced lie has been exposed, where there’s one there’s countless more.Talk to a copper and ask them if they think it’s worth chasing villains down the back streets of Ealing now....all of them where LTN barriers are; not just those listed for removal one month after installation. You can guess the answer.Have a chat with the lead op doing your rubbish collection - he may tell you they’ve applied for significant extra money due to the need for rerouting and overtime. It goes deeper....Will you notice delivery charges to your door slowly increasing?What price your leisure time when you needlessly have to add 30 mins per journey onto your day? Quadruple that if you are a bus user travelling on the severely clogged artery roads Are any new Employers really going to base their businesses in static Ealing? How long will your current Employer remain?Talk to someone else about the huge rise in pollution due to increased dense pockets of static traffic and the stress levels of residents and drivers alike...BELL OUT

Colin Goodman ● 2020d