Is anyone else unhappy about the graphic photos pertaining to the above?
Simon Wycombe ● 1172d8 Comments
I have no problem whatsoever with your opinion, however I do still stick with mine.
Rosco White ● 1170d
Doubt it is anything to do with 'PC Liberal Wokery'. I guess that a restriction on not keeping animals might be seen as denying someone from a rural area the opportunity to make a living so the law is framed to accommodate them.
Gordon Southwell ● 1170d
"I can't understand the rationale of not making the ban for life."I can, most of us can Mr Southwell.It's called PC Liberal Wokery.(I have omitted the Lefty this time, Righty's are also equally afflicted. 😂 )
I can't understand the rationale of not making the ban for life. As for the use of the photos, they weren't particularly graphic and publishing them was fully justified in this context.
Gordon Southwell ● 1171d
Leniency for despicable and not so despicable crimes has been the trend for decades now, get used to it.I don't need to comment any more, regular readers on here will know my thoughts. 😉
Rosco White ● 1172d
Perhaps Mr Gill?As they presumably were released by the RSPCA the intention is clearly to get people's attention on this issue. If it is an approach that works, it should be applauded.
Andy Jones ● 1172d
Don't often agree with you NV, but 100% on this issue.Bit of prison time or big fine too.
Keith Iddon ● 1172d
Not unhappy as the graphic nature of the photos shows the hideous nature of this crime against animals. The banshould have been for life and the fine significantly higher
N V Brooks ● 1172d