Over three quarters of residents who responded want changes removed
One of the barriers within LTN21. Picture: John Townley
Coldershaw and Midhurst Traffic Action Group (CAMTAG) has published the results of its interim survey into a West Ealing Low Traffic Neighbourhood scheme – LTN21.
A team of 80 volunteers distributed leaflets to 5,807 households within the scheme boundaries at the end of last month. 1360 responses were received, a participation rate of 23%. Of those 78% said they wished the road changes to be removed with just 19% of respondents in favour of their retention.
76% said that the changes had made their area a worse place to live in and there was little variation of opinion after the changes made by Ealing Council to the scheme in February of this year.
The results are similar to those shown by the comments received on the council's Commonplace consultation system.
In August 2020, Ealing Council installed the LTN consisting of 11 roadblocks across the area making it one of the largest such zones in the country.
For the purposes of the survey CAMTAG divided LTN21 into five zones to allow the views of sectors with similar characteristics to be reported separately.
Zone A: BROADWAY Streets able to exit to The Broadway only
Zone B: NORTHFIELDS Streets able to exit to Northfield Ave only
Zone C: BOSTON Streets able to exit to Boston Road and Boston Gardens only
Zone D: MONTAGUE A distinct and discrete area of Hanwell
Zone E: BORDERS Streets on the east, south and west borders of LTN21.
Zone E showed the highest level of opposition to the scheme with 94% of residents wanting it removed. In Zone D there was an even split between residents for and against retention of the scheme.
In all areas there was overwhelming dissatisfaction with the way Ealing Council consulted residents about the schemes.
CAMTAG's division of LTN21 into zones
CAMTAG will now analyse the comments made by residents who participated in the survey. These will be used in the development of the planned full survey on the scheme to be done in the summer which will be published at the end of the official consultation period on the scheme.
The results have been sent to senior officers of Ealing Council, local councillors, the two local MPs and the area’s London Assembly members. We have asked Ealing Council for a comment on the survey results but have yet to receive a response.
CAMTAG was founded by residents within LTN21 who were of the belief that the scheme was badly designed and could have a seriously adverse effect on the neighbourhood and actually increase congestion and pollution. It believes the LTN draws a roadblock barrier across the spine of the area, Coldershaw and Midhurst Roads, as well as severing the link between Leighton Road and Northfield Avenue.
On 29 September 2020 CAMTAG joined with other Ealing LTN groups in a legal challenge to the Orders used to implement the LTNs. This led to the Council having to issue new Orders, including for LTN21, and as a consequence to extend the public consultation period to August 2021.
The results of the survey may also have some bearing on any legal challenge to the scheme. CAMTAG plans to carry out a more comprehensive survey in the summer using primarily door-to-door visits supported by postal and online options.
A march against LTNs in Ealing is being held on Saturday 24 April organised by the Ealing Low Traffic Neighbourhood Residents Action Group assembling at 3pm in Blondin Park before progressing to Perceval House.
There are currently nine LTNs being trialled in Ealing. You can also have your say on LTNs in the borough via the council’s Commonplace website.
Residents can visit the low traffic neighbourhoods' page of Ealing council's website for further information on the schemes it has already implemented.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
April 22, 2021