Claims Made That LTN Consultation Not Impartial

Company that developed digital platform used employs Labour Councillor

Cllr Peter Mason

An Ealing councillor is claiming that the borough’s consultation on Low Traffic Neighbourhood Schemes (LTNs) will lack impartiality and transparency because of the platform being used. He is demanding an investigation into a potential conflict of interest.

The Council has given the contract to Commonplace Digital Ltd to use their online digital platform to capture responses from residents to the controversial schemes being implemented across the borough.

Council officers recently wrote to councillors saying, “Commonplace, an online surveying tool, has now been purchased and is being set up to capture formal responses to the LTN schemes as part of the consultation process. This tool will allow us to better understand residents’ perceptions of LTNs on a much larger scale.”

This company employs Labour councillor Peter Mason as its Sales and Public Affairs Manager. Cllr Mason was a member of Ealing’s cabinet until 29 September when he stood down after the failed no confidence vote for Julian Bell. He formerly had responsibility for planning and housing.

On announcing his appointment earlier this year the company said, “He joins Commonplace at a key moment for the company. The digital engagement platform is undergoing rapid growth as the prop and civictech standard bearers for inclusive and purposeful consultation. Commonplace’s platform, which enables the public to interact with plans and proposals for planning, infrastructure and housing growth has been key in diffusing controversial applications across the country.”

David Millican, a Conservative councillor representing Northfield Ward Ealing, which has two LTN schemes, said, “How on earth can residents expect a fair, transparent and impartial consultation on such a hugely controversial scheme when Ealing Council purchases the online digital platform from one of its own councillors; and the Council Leader is actively promoting support for the continuation of the scheme?"

"Let’s not forget that 3,000 local residents recently marched along Northfields Ave to Ealing Town Hall opposing the schemes; and over 9,060 have signed the online petition opposing for the LTNs, whereas only 750 have signed the petition supporting the LTNs”

“I await a response to my request to Ealing Council’s Director of Legal and Democratic Services asking for an investigation into the conflict of interest and whether the tender process was conducted fairly.”

Cllr Millican also claims that the consultation process has been compromised by council leader Julian Bell’s unequivocal support for the schemes on social media where he urged his followers to sign a petition in favour of the schemes.

We have asked the Council for a comment on Cllr Millican's claims and await a response.

Residents can visit the low traffic neighbourhoods' page of the council’s website for further information on the schemes.

Residents can email feedback to, or post them to the Highways Service, Perceval House, 14-16 Uxbridge Road, W5 2HL, quoting reference ORD XXX.

An online petition against LTNs in Ealing has been signed by over 9,000 people. A counter petition in support of the new schemes has, at the time of writing, over 700 signatures.


Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More

This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.

Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.

We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.

However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.

We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.

A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.

One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.

If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.

For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.


October 8, 2020