Southfield ward councillor says the proposed solution falls short
Cllr Andrew Steed
The Grenfell fire, where 72 people died, is nearly four years ago, and the implications for affected residents are still a long way from being resolved. Successive Conservative ministers have failed to fix the problem despite promising to do so. It will come as no great surprise that similar pledges by the Prime Minister have also failed to address the problem.
No one with any knowledge of the issues (and there are many) thinks the £3.5 billion is anything like enough to solve the problem, largely because the money is designed to only pay for work removing unsafe cladding for blocks of 18 metres and higher.
Liberal Democrats say this will not fund other aspects of fire safety work such as fire alarms, fire doors, cavity barriers, balconies, and intumescent paint. Add in the costs of 'waking watches' by guards and increased insurance premiums. The most glaring omission is the lack of funding for buildings under 18 metres: the work on buildings between four and six storeys will be funded through loans, but so far it is unclear if the freeholder or the leaseholder should apply. There is nothing in place for buildings below that height.
Liberal Democrats know that many people affected by the crisis have been unable to sell their flats because mortgage companies will not lend against them. Leaseholders are getting served Section 20 notices that their service charges are going to rocket, and some people will not be able to pay them. A survey of the mental health of affected residents in May 2020 found seven out of ten had trouble sleeping, which is understandable if you live in constant fear of fire and/or a repair bill in the region of £100,000.
The question of who is to blame will have to wait until the Grenfell Inquiry is completed, but you would start with a list including inadequate building regulations, overworked building control officials, cost cutting developers and suppliers of dangerous building materials.
Although the Tory government announced a new levy on developers to cover the cost of grants, which will be applied when they seek planning permission. A separate tax will be introduced from next year on money made in UK residential property development to raise £2 billion over a decade-though details need to be finalised.
Clearly there is a local interest with the recent granting of permission for the TfL development on Bollo Lane-one assumes as permission has been granted they will not have to pay the new levy, but they would pay eventually the development tax?
Liberal Democrat candidate for Mayor of London Luisa Porritt, who visited Chiswick in October, said: “It’s staggering the Government still doesn’t grasp the scale and seriousness of the cladding crisis, years on from the Grenfell disaster. Today’s announcement is a betrayal of all those left unsupported by the Government’s narrow criteria. People living in unsafe buildings are being told that their buildings are not tall enough or don’t have the right kind of safety defects to receive support. This is simply not good enough. If a car manufacturer put a dodgy car onto the market, we would not expect the drivers to cover the costs of putting it right. The same must apply to people’s homes. Leaseholders must not pay for building safety defects that are not their fault.”
Southfield Liberal Democrat Councillor, Andrew Steed
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We’ve always done that and won’t be changing, in fact we’d like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact firstname.lastname@example.org and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we’d be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least one article a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you’d like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
February 13, 2021