Forum Topic

We used to have to collect biodegradable bags from the Library which is quite a long way away for many people.  It was also not open when we wanted them.  Like many we were working in Central London so were unable to collect during the lunchtime, early in the morning on the way to work or after work because the library was closed by the time we got home.When the reusable bags were issued the rates of recycling increased greatly.  This was because it was free, every week and easy to do with bags that were available.  People who were putting it into the black sack collection were easily persuaded to change with a ready alternative. However the fact that it was so easy also meant that many people who were composting stopped.  This doesn't appear to have been something that was envisaged and was not something that was wanted.The Council should have considered the residents and consulted with the residents more before deciding to charge.  Unfortunately they appear to have rather misguidedly believed a consultancy who told them it was an easy way to make money.  If you can't actually provide the service people had signed up for and paid for  - especially a fortnightly one - then you are unlikely to find the residents bowled over by it.  The fact that the important residual waste collection - the vulnerable black sack collection - went spectacularly and completely wrong - there were bags and boxes all over the place.League tables have a lot to answer for.  What is the point of a greater recycling rate when the quality is so poor that  you don't get a good price for it - or it ends up in landfill because it has been contaminated?

Philippa Bond ● 4550d

I feel this thread is somehow gone off topic. I have recently received Around Ealing and it dedicates two full pages to recycling. First of all let’s have a chat to its heading “50% by 2020”. I remember sitting in the Council chamber when time and time again the then Shadow cabinet member (not other than Cllr Mafhouz) who is now the portfolio holder responsible for transport and environment, kept criticising the then Conservatives Administration of not wanting to commit itself to achieve 50% recycling rate by 2015. When his group took control of the Council in 2010 they have given themselves not 5 but 10 years to reach that target. (‘Do as I say but don’t do as I do’ comes to mind here!).Secondly, let’s have a look at the 41% current recycling rate. By end of 2010, under the old contractor, recycling rates was 39% - a 20% increase from 2006 when Labour was booted out. The following year, still under the old contractor, recycling rates reached the 43% mark. It then came the disastrous new contract which was meant, it was claimed, to save the council millions of pounds. With it came the stealth tax of £40 to Ealing residents who wanted to have their green waste collected fortnightly.  Over 5,000 residents signed our petition but, as in true Labour style, it was ignored. The council was warned that residents were not prepared to pay for a service that used to be free and weekly and would not use it.  Not only that but this tax would discourage people from recycling more. Compound to this was the great mess from the contractors: missed collections; not enough lorries and/or lorries of the wrong size for our streets; the mixed collections; difficulties in getting  replacement items and so on – and then they wonder why after three years in power recycling rate is dropping rather than rising. If in three years it has just managed to rise of a 1%, what chances does the council has to reach the 50% in seven years’ time???To try and lure people into subscribing to the garden waste Labour is now offering a 25% discount. What is not clear, however, is whether this discount also applies to pensioners and disabled residents as well who have already benefited from a 25% discount. It will be interested to see if this incentive will increase the uptake of this service. I doubt it very much!

Rosa Popham ● 4552d