Forum Topic

Tom I genuinely appreciate and accept your efforts in trying to compromise and reach a common ground in all of this. The fact that even as we are both writing these posts,there have been several more terrorist activities in various parts of the world today which exacerbates the situation even more. I am accused of hatred, which is not the case but yes I hate the actions of a group of people who commit these horrendous atrocities. Yes, I do hold the view that these people are intent on taking over not just our country but the world...their stated mission is that Islam will rule the world and their attempts are borne out by their activities. It is foolhardy to minimize the situation by assuming that the perpetrators are 'only' a small minority but ALL muslims live by shariah and the Koran so all are committed to those teachings. Remember it only took one nineteen year old teenager to reek devastating havoc and misery in Boston and brought the entire city to lock down. Surely you have heard the saying-not all Muslims are terrorists but all terrorists are Muslim. Do you not worry about their activities? It terrifies me that we should have these people amongst us. There is enough evidence that they are dangerous and are indoctrinating the next generation to follow them as with the two young men in Boston who were radicalized. Abu Qatada and Abu Hamsa are very local figures both of whom are criminals, did not belong here and preached hatred so who are the haters here...not me. It's usual that anyone who dares to make a negative comment is automatically labeled as a hater or racist..I am a realist. It's the sheer complacency and tolerance which is so concerning and folks just seem to turn a blind eye or maybe they just don't have the courage to take a stand. For my part I state my case because I fear for the future of life in this country for my children and grandchildren. Also as my friend died in 9/11 and have many family members in Boston I also have a personal perspective. For the past month I have had way too much time on my hands following hip replacement surgery so spending too much time on the computer. However, I will soon step off my soap box and return to work when I will be far too busy to be wittering on the forum. It has been interesting and enlightening and in general I remain steadfast in my convictions. Again thankyou for taking the trouble to return and I will leave it to others to carry the banner !! Bye.

Marie OConnell ● 4755d

There are plenty of happy Muslims out there.One in particular of my acquaintance is a Muslim woman in Redditch who came to this country with nothing (including no education) as a child of 14 and in just six years or so (after the best part of 20 years in poverty in the UK) has now elevated herself to a position of such wealth and respect that she spends a substantial part of each day looking for opportunities to dish out random acts of kindness to strangers.She is an observant Muslim and dresses modestly when outside the house.  The ones in burkas are very much a minority.  Even more "Muslims" are actually no more observant than the typical English person is in respect of Christianity.It is a tiny minority that causes all the murder and mayhem.The bulk of "Muslims" are as open to communicating with you as you are with them - but they are cautious at first because many of them have had bad experiences.I can't see this Sharia Law thing in East London gaining too much traction in the long run.  It is abhorrent and will not be allowed to continue IMHO.I really don't like all these mosques being built personally, but then I really don't like any large religious symbols being erected - and that goes for all the churches that got put up in the past as well.With respect to communicating with each other in their mother tongue - how do you thing English-speaking people behave when they are abroad?  I have friends who have lived in France for over 20 years now and they still speak in English within their own home (and, despite not being language luddites at all) find it difficult even now to keep up with the French indigs when the banter starts to fly at dinner parties.  It is normal.

Tony Colliver ● 4755d

Re  What makes them hate everyone so much?          xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    That is what they are told in the Koran, to kill infidels , especially Jews. Other  than that it is a question of submission to them in their countries,  by a tax being levelled on non Muslims. Whether that is still  required to be paid nowadays  in Muslim countries I do not know. Btw, Christians in Egypt are being persecuted, churches  destroyed etc BUT Christianity was THE religion of that country and the Muslim  came and took over. As I have said, the UN turns a blind eye to the  murdering, raping, kidnapping of Christian girls, burning of churches etc in Muslim lands and does sod all about it, neither does any representative of a Western country stand up and demand action. WHY is everyone so scared of Muslims. Should we take action in this country before we are taken over more than we are now. I cannot understand the obeisance to all things  Muslim that our leaders and even petty officials make to Muslims and their ways etc. Why should we do away  with Christmas, and all other signs and trappings of our  culture and customs, just to please or not upset immigrants. For example, a few years ago the British Red Cross ordered all their shops not to display anything to do with Christianity, Christmas cards etc etc. I wrote and asked the CEO why, answer was  as the B R C operates in Muslim countries, they do not want to upset them!. So because Muslims in their own countries might  get upset re B R C showing ANYTHING to do with OUR national religion and customs etc in our own country, the B R C ordered the dismissal of all things Christian. After an a wider uproar in the UK over that, the  B R C rescinded but  the damage was done as far as I was concerned and have refused to support them since.          Excellent post btw, Jean. Basic commonsense, not too well received by some, sadly.

Tony Price ● 4755d

Tony,You mentioned that moderate Muslims are genuinely frightened of these thugs but they are also frightened by the indigs since they have not been universally welcomed to date so have learned to keep themselves to themselves to avoid drawing attention.How can one communicate with a person covered from head to foot in a burka, some with just their eyes peeping out from under the veil?One can hear these people just communicating with one another in their own tongue without making any effort to integrate.Can they blame the indiginous population for being wary when such a lot of what they do is alien to us? We cannot understand why some Muslims hate us with such vengence.How can these people repay a country which welcomed them with open arms (well the government of the day did) and how can one blame the indigs for being very worried about the men in beards and strange attire who do not look one in the eye?Their ways are so different from ours, for instance I was watching Panorama last night. This programme was about Sharia Law which is widely practiced in this country. Muslims wishing to divorce and so on. Muslims do not recognise British Law, or marry according to the law of the land. They prefer to marry according to their own tradition. Therefore when the marriage breaks down they go to a Sharia Law Centre in Leyton, East London hoping for a fair hearing.There they are advised NOT to go to the Police at any cost even if they are being badly beaten by their husband! It would seem that Muslim women are treated very unfairly in this respect and sometimes end up with nothing after they finally do get a divorce. Sometimes this process takes many years.So it is understandable that the whole situation regarding Muslims seems so strange to us but if they fail to integrate with their neighbours and set up no-go areas where they say Sharia Law prevails, how are the indigs expected to behave? Are to supposed to accept this ruling that certain areas of this country are no-go areas, Muslim territory if you like? They put signs on lamp posts to say that drinking and so on is not allowed in their area and refer to Sharia Law.Can you imagine someone from his country trying to do something like this in a Muslim country?  You wouldn't last 5 minutes I can assure you.Our leaders have been so accommodating to Muslims and their religion allowing the building of Mosques in every neighbourhood. Again I ask, would Christians be permitted to build lots of churches in Muslim countries?  You think so??? Why are they so intolerant to others? In each and every country where terrorists are involved it is almost always Muslims behind that atrocity.What are they trying to achieve? What is their goal? Surely their actions wouod not make people embrace that religion?  What makes them hate everyone so much?Are there ANY happy Muslims out there?

Jean F Fernandez ● 4755d

You don't make it clear which god you follow but from what you say it is clearly not the Christian God of the Bible.Jesus is absolutely unambiguous in his guidance on these matters and there is no way that what he says can be interpreted in any other way that he would expect us to be tolerant and understanding of minorities in our midst. In fact he puts this principle right at the centre of his teaching and if you don't believe it you cannot in any way claim to be a Christian.In Matthew 22:36-40 it says,  "Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?" Jesus replied: " `Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.' This is the first and greatest commandment. And the second is like it: `Love your neighbor as yourself.' All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments."Just in case this is not clear he give us the parable of the Good Samaritan. The Samaritans were a distrusted and despised ethnic minority in the Holy Land in the time of Jesus on earth. There is no room for argument that he is telling us that we should treat people as individuals and not groups who we collectively regard ourselves as better than.The sad fact is that these most important teachings of Jesus have often been disregarded. The Samaritans themselves were ultimately wiped out by ethnic cleansing and the doctrines of people like Marie O'Connell continue be spouted by people who in ignorance call themselves Christians.

Maria Plunkett ● 4756d

It's a crazy world we live in. When God made the world he put many groups of people in various parts of the world each with their  own language religion culture,  customs, dress, food etc  and he gave them the skin which was suited to the climate. - black in very hot countries so they wouldn't burn in the sun, brown where it is a bit cooler and white in weather like ours. People are happy in their own groups mongst their own kind, all peaceful and natural. Then someone came up with idea of interfering with nature and God's plan . They thiought. It would be a good idea to change the  dynamics and mix people up outside their established areas . It was done in the name of. ' diversity '  and everyone wa supposed  to be the same and get on harmoniously . Well , it was not a good idea  - and naturally people strived to live their own way of life in theses strange lands and it all went wrong which is why there is so much conflict in the world today.  If something isn't natural, it isn't right. Now we have Muslims living in the west where they  expect to be accommodated to live their lifestyle and have been made welcome yet they outwardly hate us and want to take us over . They should revert to God's original plan and go back to where he put them in the first place since they dislike  his western world so much. Maybe then they wouldn't feel the need to terrorise, kill and maime people who are not of their kind and don't want to be dominated by them . The conflict will not stop while they continue to  defy nature  so the message is for them as well as any other misplaced group to go back to their original land where they had put down their roots .

Marie OConnell ● 4756d

"Perhaps those who are against violence are afraid of fellow Muslims so they keep quiet?"Yep, that's correct.I know a number of moderate Muslims in the Birmingham area and they refer to "the guys with the scary beards" - who it is clear one does not mess with."In Belfast during the troubles people would come out in the streets with banners saying 'NOT IN OUR NAME' and demanding PEACE"I don't doubt you for a moment, but you know, in all the tens of years that conflict was going on I was never once personally aware that that was happening.My point being that if the mainstream news doesn't routinely carry it then it is surprising how much one can remain in ignorance of.Perhaps Muslims are protesting but we just never see it.Every one of the Muslims that I know doesn't agree with what the "guys with scary beards" are getting up to but I also understand why they would not grandstand that - just the same as typical indigs wouldn't rush out to man the barriers at the drop of a hat either. Yes, they are genuinely frightened of these thugs, but they are also frightened of the indigs since they have not been universally welcomed to date so have learnt to keep themselves to themselves to avoid drawing attention.Interesting that the boot is on the other foot in Burma - the Buddhists including some monks - who I always assumed to be the very epitome of peace on the planet - are waging a vicious campaign against the Muslims - to include setting fire to a man in a street recently whilst the police looked on.

Tony Colliver ● 4756d

To live in harmony with one's fellow man one must show tolerance to those of another faith, or none. Surely it is up to each and everyone to treat his/her neighbour with respect, irrespective of whether or not that neighbour shares the same beliefs?This wonderful country of hours has welcomed people from overseas to live and work amongst us, but I feel that our way of life is changing at a rapid rate, so much so that areas of this land are barely recognisable.Cultures which do not integrate or tolerate their neighbours is surely a recipe for disaster. Why come here if you do not respect us, wish to mingle with us, hate us and wish us harm?This was predominately a Christian country but more and more this has been 'dummed down' in case we upset the minority. As Tony said, Christmas becomes 'Winterval' our meal must be halal, whether the majority like it or not.When you visit a country you should respect and abide by their laws, so even more so when you migrate to a country you should be willing to live by the laws and ways of that country, not try to change it to suit your own desires.Muslims sadly are NOT tolerant of those who do not follow their beliefs. I recall years ago in Malaysia a little Catholic Church was ordered to switch of a cross on the steeple as it was upsetting Muslims.Non Muslims were NOT permitted to purchase homes - there was a huge sign on developments stating 'Bumiputras Only' (Malays only). I am not saying that this would happen here but it does give some insight as to their mindset.I have rarely heard Muslims criticise their own people for terrorist activities. They are noted for their silence on this and other topics when it refers to their own.Unless and until these people change their views and their ways the feeling of alienation amongst the indigenous population can only get worse.We should follow the example of the Australian PM - you are welcome to come and live here amongst us but this is a Christian country and if you don't like our ways then you are welcome to leave.None of our leaders has the guts to speak out and we are termed racist when we air our views.

Jean F Fernandez ● 4760d

'you said there weren't any. I proved you were wrong, and who more do you want the the Grand Mufti  of Jerusalem no less.'Apologies. I seem to have confused you again by using sentence structures that you aren't able to cope with. I refer you back to the post where I say 'the overwhelming majority of Muslims fought against Hitler.' Majority is a word that means most but not all. Implicit in this statement is that some Muslims did indeed fight on the side of the Axis powers.What seems to have befuddled you is when I said 'Hitler had no Muslim allies'. Most people would assume this meant that no sovereign Muslim territories were allied to Hitler but you have taken the meaning to be that no single Muslim supported Hitler. To be clear, this is not what I meant.As to how many Muslims fought on the side of the Nazis I don't know the exact number but 'hundreds of thousands' is certainly not it. You appear to have just made that number up. Germany had no territories with signifcant Muslim populations. Italy had areas of North African but as much of this had been recently conquered by force they probably were unwilling participants certainly not the volunteers that the Muslims were who fought with the British. The Germans tried to make trouble for the British across their empire and in some cases they had existing adversories who were Muslim but little effective opposition came from these efforts.The point about British supporters of Hitler was aiming to try to demonstrate to you that in any nation/community there will be some that do choose a different direction. Their actions can't be used to characterise those of everyone else.I'm not sure how my insistence on historical accuracy on these matters constitutes an 'anti-indig Brit stance.' Surely a recognition of the debt we owe to everyone who supported us in our time of greatest need elevates us as a nation and a failure to acknowledge it would make us contemptible?

Andy Jones ● 4760d

Aaron Shaw wrote, "that is funny, just done some research and seems that today only 3% of the Indian army is muslim that is around only 29,000 troops... Now I am not sure about the war but i doubt your figure are anywhere close."The Second World War is over. In fact it finished over 60 years ago. Because they are not involved in a global conflict the Indian Government don't have as big an army as they used to. There was a larger proportion of Muslims in the Indian army in WWII because at that time the predominantly Muslim Pakistan and Bangladesh were part of India.Marie O'Connell wrote, "Don't need any more history lessons. Times, people and circumstances (except Muslims ) have changed and we need to deal with dangers these people represent today." When you say Muslims haven't changed, do you mean they would still be willing to fight and die for our freedoms as they did during WWII?A knowledge of history is critical for understanding of our current day society. There are vital lessons to be learned including that the demonisation and persecution of a minority by a majority always ends badly."Mosques cannot be compared to churches and in any case this is a Christian country..... as churches would not be allowed in an Islamic country so mosques should not be erected here"There are 57 Muslim majority countries in the World and Churches can be built in all but one - Saudi Arabia. They don't allow Churches as they believe all their land is sacred to their religion as that is where it was born. I don't believe that following that country's lead in forming policy in the UK as you advocate is a good idea.

Andy Jones ● 4760d

It does seem a shame that given that so many people of this faith fought and died for the freedoms we enjoy today and are now having their contributions denied.Tony Price has found examples of one or two individual Muslims who were persuaded to support Hitler but if he looked he could also find example of British people who supported and even fought for Hitler.The Indian army during WWII numbered 2.4 million of which about 750,000 were Muslims. Support for the British cause was more widespread amongst Muslims than Hindus who were more inclined to respond to Gandhi's pacifist messager. Aaron Shaw has raised the Sikh contribution which shouldn't be ignored but only 150,000 Sikh's fought for the British - the highest proportion of their population than any other religious group but still a fraction of the Muslim support. Please bear in mind this was a volunteer army - possibily the biggest in history. It was slightly smaller than the British army but not by much and saw action not just in Burma but across most theatres of war during the conflict. It would be hard for any one to convincingly argue it didn't make a decisive difference to the outcome.Perhaps the words of Winston Churchill might give you some pause for reflection. He said, ‘We must not on any account break with the Moslems, who represent a hundred million people, and the main army elements on which we must rely for the immediate fighting’The associations and friendships made between British and Indian servicemen during this time did lead to some of the latter settling here not just Sikhs but Muslims also. The associations continue in this area, for instance the RAF's Muslim Association is based in Northolt. I for one would think it would be wrong now to deport them, their children and their grandchildren.

Andy Jones ● 4761d

'I don't know the situation in WW1  but in WW11 the Muslims were well and truly on the side of Hitler, joining with him to defeat the British. Bearing in mind the antics of Lawrence of Arabia to win over the Arabs, it would not surprise me if in WW1 they were  " pro-German " ?'In WWII the overwhelming majority of Muslims would have been fighting on the side of the allies. There would have been a significant Muslim presence in the forces under General Slim in Burma. About 2.5mn soldiers saw combat from the Indian sub-continent and given that this includes current day Pakistan and Bangladesh that would have included at least a third who were Muslims. Elsewhere Muslims in territories occupied by the Japanese such as Indonesia and Malaya resisted bravely.Hitler had no Muslim allies. He did try to co-opt some Muslim nationalists to his side but had little success. The main supporters of the Axis in India were Hindus and they were a tiny minority who attracted no support.A bit of local history that you might find interesting is that the reason so many Indians, including Muslims, originally settled in West London is that they were invited back by their British friends and comrades in arms to a country rebuilding and in real need of their skills.In the first world war the Germans did have a Muslim ally in the Ottoman Empire. They were Turks and Lawrence of Arabia helped the Arabs rebel against them. Outside this theatre of conflict there would have been a large number of Muslims from the Indian Army and French colonial forces fighting for the allies and very few for the Central Powers.So, hundreds of thousands of Muslims fought on our side in both world wars and tens of thousands died. The British troops who fought beside them would be appalled that within living memory their sacrifice would be disregarded by some. Can I suggest reading some books to get a better understanding of your own country's history?

Andy Jones ● 4761d