Forum Topic

I have pointed out before that what you have said is factually incorrect but I'll repeat it anyway.The NHS is not collapsing due to usage by illegal immigrants. They account for a tiny, tiny proportion of total spending. Obviously an attempt should be made to limit this but it is not the major issue you present it to be.Immigrants in general make a positive contribution to the NHS. No serious economist disputes this - you have to accept it as a fact.The NHS is not collapsing but it is struggling to cope with an ageing population and increased life expectancy. Without immigration it probably would collapse. Many immigrants are from EU countries where we have reciprocal agreements for health care allowing us to get free treatment in their countries. A large proportion of EU immigrants in this area are from Eastern Europe so we don't necessarily get back as much as we spend but 100,000s of British people benefit from free treatment when on holiday in Europe and the Spanish taxpayer pays a huge bill for British people living there so it all evens out. As for immigrants from non-EU countries (who are these days a relatively small proportion) are you expecting them to come here and pay taxes yet not be entitled to health care? This would be fundamentally unfair and very difficult to administer and probably end up saving hardly any money.The problem seems to be that as you live in an area with a high level of immigration when you go to your Doctors you see mainly people who are not English. You are extrapolating this experience to the whole country and imagining that it is just immigrants that use the NHS. This is not the case - they probably use it less than the generality of the population because they tend to be younger than average.

Andy Jones ● 4921d

'I distinctly recall having read  differently, that the "gain " is so small as being  not worth having but when  other aspects taken into consideration such as costs  to schooling, N H S etc , a great deficit ( those things so beloved of the previous government )is the end result.'You can distinctly recall reading this but not where you read it. Wherever it was it is untrue. The net contribution of immigrants to the exchequer is a substantial positive."large proportion will leave the country if they can't find work - you must be joking"I'm not. Since 2009 there has been a marked increase in immigrants having been made unemployed leaving the UK. That is one of the reason for the sharp fall in the net migration numbers."Re paid in tax by immigrants far exceeds the amount paid to provide them health care. -but you should relate what they take from the N H S to what they pay in Nat. Insce. contributions, and only part thereof."Why? National insurance is not hypothecated for spending on the Health Service.Reread my earlier post and you see that I did not use the total tax take from immigrants as the basis for working out their net contribution to the NHS but the proportion of their tax paid that would go to the NHS.You have made the claim that because you say 8% of benefits claimants are immigrants and because immigrants are 8% of the population are immigrants therefore all immigrants claim benefits. To put it kindly this shows that you don't really understand how statistics work. By trying to base your opinions on them you are invariably wrong.

Andy Jones ● 4933d

'I don't think that is true, have not Migration Watch  dispelled that NL illusion.'No, they haven't. Migration Watch don't deny that immigration has been and can be beneficial to the economy they just argue it has been too high in recent years and therefore economies at a local level have been unable to adjust. They may be right but in any case net immigration has fallen sharply.No economist disputes that immigration has been an overall positive for the UK economy though some have reservations about the scale in the last decade.'And as most [immigrants] are on benefits,' This in completely untrue. In fact immigrants are much less likely to be on benefits than the general population because they tend to be of working age and a large proportion will leave the country if they can't find work. You are probably thinking of asylum seekers who are forced to go on benefits because they are not allowed to work. As soon as they are granted residency they are much more likely to take full-time employment than the general population.'immigrants etc are of benefit to the NHS.... mainly as recipients I would suggest?'No.The concept of net benefit is something that clearly you find difficult to grasp as a concept so I'll try and explain in the simplest possible terms. The amount paid in tax by immigrants far exceeds the amount paid to provide them health care. If you only consider the proportion of tax paid by immigrants equivalent to the proportion of Government spending on health they still will make a significant net contribution. This is not even considering the very significant proportion of the skilled NHS workforce that immigrants account for.

Andy Jones ● 4933d

I watched the programme. Firstly, this problem has nothing to do with immigrants. There is a clue in the title with the use of the word 'tourist'. The issue here is of foreign nationals coming to this country to illegally gain access to health care - they go home when they are cured. This is obviously wrong but to say that it is causing the country to 'descend into the depths of ruination' is comically over the top. The total cost of treatment of foreign nationals was estimated to be £50 million of which 80% was successfully reclaimed. The remaining £10 million is a tiny fraction of 1% of the overall health budget.I presume I am one of the misguided do-gooders being referred to as I have previously tried to point out facts to counter some of the ridiculous and untrue statements made on this forum.There are two facts which are not disputed by anyone with an IQ of over 100 because they are true. Firstly immigrants net make a positive contribution to the exchequer and secondly the NHS could not function without recruiting skilled staff from overseas.A few years ago my aunt was struck down with liver cancer. She spent here final few weeks in hospital under the care of a skilled oncologist and a team of nurses who set the highest standards for professionals. The Doctor was from Malaysia and not a single member of the nursing staff was trained in this country. Any one who says immigrants are not of benefit to the NHS is speaking from prejudice and not direct experience.

Andy Jones ● 4934d