Forum Topic

It is the packaging companies who certainly were at the top of the Rich List.We have been paying to dispose of an increasing amount of packaging because there was no limit at all on the amount or type used. Only because the public started to say 'no' we didn't ask for it/don't want it have companies including the supermarkets started to re-look at their packaging and modify it (and there have been some great changes).I liked the Tesco idea (not widespread enough and not publicised enough) of asking their customers to leave their unwanted packaging at the till but it is not enough and will be considered by many as 'greenwash'. In Germany you can do this anyway.  It would be better to not have that unnecessary packaging though and so not have to have extra carrier bags to take it away if you've forgotten them/can't be bothered. Why should we have to pay to dispose of it/recycle it?  Why should we have the bother?Less in = Less out.I think there are better things to spend Council Tax money on - I'd prefer mine to go on some of the services that are being cut for those that are less able - and I think it would be better to have the choice of being able to buy our food without having to pay for carrier bags 'factored in'.The supermarkets have their own league tables and there is a lot of oneupmanship going on. They are forever trying to win customers off each other. Check out the Corporate Responsibility sections of their websites for some marketing spin.There is a lot of lobbying going on the world of plastics - just as there is in politics.  There is a lot of money and power involved. Consequently there is a gentleman's agreement to reduce the amount and every so often the politicians stamp their little feet.

Philippa Bond ● 5027d

You have your own bags for life or you re-use your current bags, actually so do I, as do others on this forum. None of the bags that come into my home are simply put into the black bag, if not reused they go in the recycling.A service I pay for.You ask why not buy them, the answer is that I am already paying for them with the price of the food.  It's all factored in and Mr Sainsbury or Mr Tesco ain't going broke.  Mark & Spencer are a long way from hitting the breadline.  Mr Waitrose makes so much wonga they give the staff a bonus.What you seem blinkered to, is that the boys and girls running the show have worked out how to do yet more penny pinching from us.  Someone has worked out that if they tell us the world will end unless we do X,Y and Z, we will follow and open up our purses without question to give to the cause.Reminds me of religion in some ways.  You say giving them out free encourages us to eat more, I buy what I need when I need it, easy in a place like Ealing.I'm also not overwieght, are you?So it isn't me or you who is contributing to this and the next "crisis" (which will soon be uncovered) and we all managed to change our behaviour without having to pay a surcharge on our shopping.MP's are known for telling the truth aren't they?  MP's are known for caring about what happens on their patch, they are responsible individuals who, 24/7, think about the people who voted them in, they NEVER have any second jobs, they NEVER have any sidelines or distractions and NEVER abuse the system or the population for personal gain

Amy Brookes ● 5028d

The supermarkets have an agreement with the Government called the Courtauld Commitment.  The idea is that rather than legislation against the issue of these bags they will reduce the number that they give out.  However this is David Cameron last year:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/sep/29/cameron-law-plastic-bag-useand before that in 2006 we had Ben Bradshaw the Minister for the Environment telling us to leave packaging at the tillhttp://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/nov/14/supermarkets.ethicallivingIn 2009 Tesco had this initiative:http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2009/apr/01/tesco-packaging-waste-trialSupermarkets use carrier bags as advertising. There is a very good essay called The Perils of Plastic Amnesia which details how the supermarkets started by giving away an extra bag (extra to our basket that we always used to take shopping) then more and more. Now they deliver lorryloads of food to homes.  The more we buy the more we pay, the more we eat, the fatter we get and the fatter we get the more we want to eat.When quizzed on why they couldn't all agree to stop giving free carrier bags the answe was if we all decided that would be considered as having a cartel.  There is tremendous rivalry amongst the supermarkets.They do not have to sell items at cost they often sell items as loss leaders in order to get shoppers into their stores eg alcohol and milk.  They place the basics in different areas of the store so that you have to pass more tempting items as you go from one to the other.Never go shopping on an empty stomach you will buy totally different things from thos that you buy when you have just eaten. Perhaps it would be better if all packaging was taxed. Then they'd think more about whether we actually need it.

Philippa Bond ● 5029d