Forum Topic

Re    More facts to follow.            xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  SMALL extract from an article sent me yesterday :-    " Amid the pomp and ceremony of England’s recent Diamond Jubilee,marking sixty years of the Queen’s reign, a grim truth was beingglossed over: England is gradually capitulating to the law of thejungle.Last month, nine Muslim men were convicted for organized sex crimesranging from rape to sex trafficking over more than two decades ofsexual violence against underage white girls in the north of England.The gang passed the victims around to have sex with several men a day,several times a week in houses, cars, taxis and kebab shops. Onethirteen-year-old was forced to have sex with twenty men in one night.The kicker is that authorities had evidence of it as far back as 1991and could have prevented years of abuse to dozens of young girls. Butcomplaints to the police and social workers were ignored.Why? Former Member of Parliament Ann Cryer declared that theauthorities were “petrified of being called racist and so reverted tothe default of political correctness.” As journalist Melanie Phillipsputs it, in politically correct Britain, no criticism of religious orethnic identities is allowed: “And so the child rape industryproceeded with repeated failures to prosecute.”Who are the British authorities not reluctant to punish? A 42-year-oldwhite secretary who complained, in an expletive-filled rant caught onvideo, about the decaying effects of immigration and multiculturalismon British civilization. For that verbal explosion, which no doubtrepresented a collective sense of her countrymen’s frustration, shereceived 21 weeks in jail. The Islamist enemies within Britain canopenly express their desire to destroy the country and yet still stayon the government dole; but a peaceful white working-class citizen whois fed up with watching her country go down the drain is sentenced tojail. "

Tony Price ● 5073d

Re  Take the trouble to look around you,read official reports and surveys,          xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  It is abundantly clear that G K has got rattled, just look at his posts and see how he is obsessed with me, masses of personal abuse ( oft regarded as the last refuge of the scoundrel ). People don't get rattled if they can express themselves logically, eruditely and effectively, which obviously some sycophants on here of mass immigration realise they can't  or pull the wool over the eyes of the population of the UK, 80% of whom the effects of immigration was their main concern, overtaken for the time being by the economy etc. If one analyses what some sycophants have written  eg " why do you hate me if you have never met me?" Gawd 'elp us, whoever said anyone hated that poster. They must be on the Forums just to stir up disharmony. And not one of them has explained what is not immoral re the dispersal of communities ( Southall as a perfect LOCAL example ) by the influx of others. Consevationists won't even allow flora, fauna and land and sea creatures to be uprooted by developers, so why should the most sentient of all be expected to be kicked around and like it. There is something or someone behind these sycophants, hidden agenda,and/or hidden hands with hidden agendas. Otherwise,  their behaviour doesn't make sense. And to try to get me silenced for saying what the great part of the population say is very interesting, disturbing in fact. To quote some of what is felt, I picked the following up yesterday from an article  to which some had made comments :-        stephen4) 4 hours agoI live in central London, (Westminster) We have a social housing flat and we are completly surronded by Afgans, Iraqs, Somalians, Sudan, India, China, Pakistan, Nigeria, and so called other dark looking europeans.10% of my child school is only British white, and they are breeding and breeding.So when the goverment say that know immigrants get social housing, well take it from me they do.It's a sh*t hole, they throw rotten food and sanitry towels, nappies from there balconys, and this is Westminster.Less70 21 Replies (6)Hide repliesReport SpamPrevious repliesWrite a reply...keith powell (listento the law)4 hours agoRoger Asquith.....Think we have lived parallel lives...I too lived for twenty years in PS California....Im there with you all the way.....London is so very very bad now.....LA and SF too are overcrowded with foreigners that LOVE their cities.... foreigners here have just taken the UK for granted and ruined it!!!!!        chollerton 5 hours agocant ever see the attraction with london,i worked there for 7 years and found it a filthy city with hardly any english people living there!!61 13 Replies 15 14 Replies (0)Hide repliesReport SpamPrevious repliesWrite a reply...David Martin (davey m)5 hours agoYeah London's ok I once bumped into an English guy there - that made 2 of us Happy Days       Someone7 hours agoLondon is rubbish. The only decent thing about our capital is its history74 29 Replies (0)Hide replies                xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  More facts to follow.

Tony Price ● 5073d

In times of hardship perhaps we are guilty of looking for someone to blame for the situation in which we find ourselves? When money is tight then it would seem that even governments must tighten the belt and live within their means.Successive governments have rightly been put in the spotlight for seeming to concentrate their attention on newcomers to the detriment of the indigenous population.This is not a new situation - many will remember back in the 60's when signs in windows stated: 'No Blacks, No Irish, No Dogs' and I am sure we would not wish to go back to those days.However, until such time as our government is seen to be fairer on ALL members of our society rather than appearing to concentrate on some sections whilst ignoring the rest then I am afraid that their actions will surely only cause more ill-feeling and resentment amongst the population.When some people are trying to count the pennies and try to get by on a daily basis then it is hard for them to see what appears to be huge sums of money available to provide everything including luxury houses to newcomers.It is rather like having 10 children but spoiling just 1 child and ignoring the others!IDS has been trying his best to ensure that the benefits system is completely overhauled but he seems to come against massive opposition whichever way he turns. No-one wants to have their benefits cut or reduced yet some people think that they are entitled to benefits throughout their lives without bothering to seek employment. How can this be right?No idea what the solution is but the sooner one is found the better!

Jean F Fernandez ● 5073d

There are very few jobs around.  Don't you read the newspapers or watch the news?  Do you think youth unemployment figures are being made up? I think it's understandable if people eventually have the will to work eroded by being presented with rubbish jobs on rubbish pay or, more likely at the moment, not finding jobs at all. It's all very well pointing the finger at the 'workshy' - how well do you think you would bear up after applying for hundreds of jobs or being unable to find anything you can apply for week after week?Once the govt scrapped the EMA grant to college students, lots of young people could not afford to keep attending their course, thereby adding to the group of undereducated teenagers who cannot get their foot on the work ladder.  There are only so many unskilled, poorly paid jobs to go round and most of those have hundreds of applicants at the moment and a lot of those applicants are highly qualified people who have been made redundant and had to drop down the pay scale in order to get a job at all.As for stopping people reproducing:  good luck with that.  Like inefficiencies in the NHS, get used to it.  If you cut back on child benefit for poorer families with lots of children, guess what?  The family becomes poorer and the children have a poorer quality of life. Lovely to see professed Christians on here recommending cutting back on benefits for families with non-Western European numbers of children. I work full-time and have done for years.  That's a combination of my personal qualities and skills and pure luck.  Luck to be born in to a family where I was supported enough to move on to a higher standard of living as I got older.  Luck because I had friends and family to fall back on if I got into a tight spot.  Some people aren't so lucky and if anyone on here thinks they got where they are purely on their own merits, then you are delusional.

Allison Franklin ● 5078d

Can this be fair or right?A family of Somali benefits claimants living in a £2 million home courtesy of the taxpayer admitted they couldn't believe their luck yesterday.To the anger of neighbours, the family of ten are allowed to live in a six-bedroom end of terrace Georgian townhouse in one of London's most fashionable areas, populated by high flying lawyers and stockbrokers.The family use housing benefits to pay heavily discounted rent for the four-story house in Islington close to Tony Blair's former home which boasts a variety of features including chandeliers and wood flooring.The House also has balconies and a large back garden was almost £100,000 was spent on extensive renovations last year to create two extra bedrooms for the familyA fellow inhabitant Mohamed, 55 said we were on the Council waiting list. All adults in the home are on housing benefits and income support.We are lucky that is very big family I have been in temporary housing for years before this, we are good people.However there is less acceptance from some neighbors, a 72-year-old resident called Harry said this just not fair there are families are stuck in tiny flats and his family gets luxury.Most people in the country couldn't afford such a house. It seems wrong particularly when families are struggling during this recession. Then we see new carpets and TVs being brought in, where is the fairness in that? I don't think there's another country in the world where you can would be handed to £2 million House if you turned up.Another resident said she thought the Council should be forced to sell such prime properties and spend the money on social housing.It is unclear when the Somali family who have been living in the house for about a year, came to the UK and whether they arrived asylum-seekers. The precise breakdown of the benefits they receive is not known.Robert Oxley of the taxpayers alliance said the case showed why benefit reform was necessary to ensure that there is a safety net for the poorest and most vulnerable while protecting taxpayers against paying for the big expensive houses.A spokesman for Islington Council said Islington has a desperate shortage of affordable homes and is a highly valued area. This council home has been owned by the Council for many years and is currently listed as Islington family who were in great housing need.

Jean F Fernandez ● 5079d

Apparently the government has a huge amount of unclaimed money which pensioners are entitled to but unfortunately a lot of these deserving members of our society are far too proud to apply for what they consider to be handouts. The application form can be very daunting for many to fill in and so the money, in many cases, goes unclaimed.There are huge savings which could probably be made if the government tackled the very rich who with clever accounting can easily avoid paying tax, likewise huge companies operating in the UK who also avoid paying the correct amount of tax. Bankers with their huge bonuses, how can they pay millions to those who brought some banks almost to their knees?Politicians arr also quite adept at making sure they milk the system for all they are worth - and get away with it!On the other hand pensioners are expected to live on a miserly pension (I would love to put some of our politicions in this position for a month and see how they manage to live on a pension). They would fail miserably!Pensioners are also penalised if they were thrifty enough to save a little for their retirement, then, should they need to go into a care home they have to fund their care, but on the other hand, those who never bothered to save for a rainy day are well looked after in their old age. So thrift is not rewarded but for those who never bothered to save are well looked after! Can this be fair?Another thought, how come that those who never bothered working, lived a life on benefits, also manage to get a nice pension in their old age? Why bother working in that case? What about those families where 2nd and 3rd generation never even bothered working? Again they are rewarded by the state. How can it be right that families would lose out if they went out to work?The entire system needs to be taken apart and start again from scratch but I bet there is not one politician with the will nor the inclination to do anything about it.To now even consider stopping the Freedom Pass for pensioners really is a step too far in my opinion. By trying to means test pensioners before they can get a Freedom Pass is a very expensive experiment. It will not work for the reasons stated above, many pensioners will not apply and therefore lose out.If a pensioner is unable to get out and about by using a Freedom Pass they may well end up feeling very lonely and vulnerable. It is actually improving the health and wellbeing of pensioners to allow them to get out and about to meet their friends, attend hospital appointments,go shopping, spend time in a park or at a local club. It would be a very hard hearted society who would allow this to happen surely? MP's (from ALL parties) are so far removed from what goes on in everyday life that they really ought to get out more and actually travel by bus, meet the people and see what goes on in society, not enjoy being ferried about in limousines all the time.Not all pensioners will use their Freedom Pass all the time of course, especially those with transport or with more money at their disposal. Then what about the Winter Fuel Allowance? Are politicians aware that in many cases pensioners have to make a decision whether or not to eat or to heat their homes to keep warm in winter? No I am sure they do not, otherwise they surely would drop the idea of stopping this allowance immediately! However, I cannot see the need to pay Winter Fuel Allowance to those pensioners living in very warm countries! It does not make much sense.Government should instead be doing much more to tackle these huge Utility Companies (Most not even owned by this country) milking us for all they are worth with ever increasing higher costs for heating, lighting and even for the water we drink. We don't own anything any more, all sold down the river!This country over the past decade or so attracted people from all over the globe to come and settle here, unfortunately quite a high proportion came for one reason and one reason only - BENEFITS. Now many won't like this statement but that is fact. Most pensioners have worked all their lives and at the end of their working career they are left to survive on a measley pension, and then hear MP's trying to somehow take any other little allowance away from them? Ridiculous!Gordon Brown even sold off our gold reserves at a rock bottom price. We need someone to run this country for the benefit of all who live in it, not to feather their own nests. Right now I really don't think anyone can sort this country out.

Jean F Fernandez ● 5079d