Forum Topic

Is it always the driver's fault when a pedestrian is knocked down on a zebra crossing?It has an awful lot to do with vulnerability.We all need to take care to look and to be seen.I still remember in the 70s a bus screeching to a halt in front of me as I crossed a zebra wearing a bright yellow sailing mac.  I wasn't running (like the jogger who comes up from behind and crosses on a zebra) but for whatever reason he just kept on coming.  Cycles often can't be seen side on.  There are reflectors you can put on the spokes.  I am amazed at the number of cyclists who ride without ANY lights.  I also think that cyclists (pedal and motor) should bear in mind how far back from the car's headlamps the eyes of the driver are.  It is not the headlamps that need to see you in daytime and at night-time/poor visibility it is both the headlamps and the eyes of the driver.Take extra care as a cyclist/motorcyclist just because you can overtake at the traffic lights when cars are stationary as there may be side roads with cars trying to cross.  Don't just focus on the traffic lights. I saw a nasty accident where this happened.I was also nearly run down by a light-jumping fast cyclist overtaking a stopped car at the lights outside the Town Hall. The crossing was beeping indicating it was safe to cross. We were commenting just the other day though that people don't seem to slow down for roundabouts any more.  Just because it looks clear when you are yards away doesn't mean it actually will be when you get there (and sometimes there is another road user hidden behind the one you can see).It is interesting to look at old film of people cycling to work.  They ride sedately and not as if they are trying to set a speed record with their heads down staring at the road until the front wheel.More haste less speed!I think we should all be taking more care.Don't let it stop you cycling. 

Philippa Bond ● 5172d

Hope you're OK and not too shaken by what happened. I have never learned to drive or ridden a bike (I grew up in a cobbled mews - too bumpy) so my experience of bad behaviour on the part of cyclists is based on being a pedestrian or a passenger in cars and buses. I walk home every weekday evening after work from West Ealing to Greenford, have done for almost five years, and have come to the conclusion that a cyclist will kill or seriously injure me one day. The journey along Uxbridge Road/Argyle Road/A40/Greenford Road can be absolutely terrifying but fares are now so high it isn't worth my working unless I walk home. Cyclists screech to a halt no more than a couple of inches from me on pavements and narrowly avoid me as they sail through red lights at crossings. I have been a car passenger when one rode the wrong way around a roundabout on Argyle Road in the dark, no lights or bright clothing, and had to swerve to avoid us. The same idiot frequently rides at speed along the same road, swerving on and off the pavement. Cyclists of all ages seem to think that wobbling along (on the road or the pavement) while trying to text is a mature way to behave and do not apologise when they ride straight into you. They seem to be in a world of their own.Last week I watched a blind woman prepare to cross at the lights outside Daniels in Uxbridge Road and actually closed my eyes as she stepped onto the crossing because I assumed that she would be hit by a cyclist that she couldn't see. This crossing has a particular problem with drivers and cyclists who ignore red lights. Yesterday, as I crossed a bit further up Uxbridge Road, a cyclist had to grab the traffic light post to stop herself and stay upright because I had given her a dirty look as I crossed. From the embarrassed smirk on her face I could tell she knew she was in the wrong. I have considered carrying a can of spray paint to mark these idiots out so that I can report them but would, of course, be liable to prosecution myself.I accept that there are fools of every variety on the world's roads and pavements, but it cannot be that hard to deal with the ones who repeatedly put their own and other lives at risk. I believe the confiscation of whichever car or bike they were using at the time might a least put them off for a while.

Albertina McNeill ● 5184d

Aarrgghhhh!  This makes my blood boil.As a car driver, cyclist, and past motorcyclist I simply cannot accept that cyclists are the totally innocent party in all of this.To adopt a very broad brush approach for the sake of brevity - there are two types of cyclists – sane ones, and insane** ones. [** Of course the same applies to all other road users as well, but we are dealing with cyclist here.]I will spend no more time on the insane fraction of cyclists, as they have been adequately covered in other posts to this topic.But as a car driver who tries very hard not to hit stuff – whether it be a cyclist or anything else – I WOULD LIKE TO ADVISE ALL CYCLISTS VERY CLEARLY THAT THEY ARE EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO SPOT AT TIMES, and no amount of righteous hogwash about drivers not taking enough care is ever going to change that.  Therefore it is absolutely imperative if accidents involving cyclists are to be reduced that they start to take more responsibility for their own safety and ride accordingly.Over some thirty odd years of driving I have had half a dozen or so near misses with cyclists that I have not seen when I should have done.  Fortunately, disaster has always been averted to date, but I live in dread of a day coming when the cyclist and I are not so lucky.  The plain fact of the matter is that cyclist *ARE* extremely difficult to see at times and it simply cannot be avoided by brushing it under the carpet and trying to ignore it.  All that will happen as a result is that cyclists will continue to be maimed.  Cyclists therefore need to take this into account as they move about on the roads.For many years in my twenties I rode high powered motorbikes.  At times I rode very fast.  I never had an accident (plenty of speeding tickets but no accidents). This is down to one simple mantra that I used to repeat to myself every single time that I got on the bike – referring to car (and other) drivers (and pedestrians as well!):    “Remember, they really *ARE* out to kill you!”  Of course this is not literally true – it simply reflects the reality that, even on a large motorbike, presenting maybe four times the profile of a cyclist, and with its headlight blazing wherever it went, a significant fraction of drivers of other vehicles would simply not see you.  Speed is not a factor here by the way – a car driver can look straight through you as if you are not there all the way from stationary to seventy miles an hour.  As a consequence, I rode everywhere on the basis that I was effectively invisible to all others on the road unless and until their actions proved otherwise.  I am clear that adopting this simple mindset every single time that I left the house was a significant aid in staying alive where so many other motorcyclists had not been so lucky.  Cyclists need to adopt this approach as well.I continue to practice it today – regardless of what I am driving or riding - and it stand me in good stead, as the standard of car driving (and cycling) on the roads seems to be getting worse as time goes by.  Barely a week goes by without me being responsible for averting a collision or other adverse event which it really should have been the “responsibility” of the other party to have prevented occurring in the first place had they been adequately attentive.  But it is no good me getting self-righteous about this situation. I simply accept it as a fact of life.  To do otherwise would be to sustain dents and bumps (or worse) to my own vehicle which I otherwise manage to avoid.  And of course the whole point of this policy is to recognise human failing – including my own – and hope that in those occasional moments when my own senses fail me the guy coming the other way is looking out in the same way that I always strive to. Other road users (well at least the sane fraction of them anyway) really would prefer not to cause cyclists any harm but the realities of the way that the human vision system and brain works means that cyclists would be very unwise to abdicate responsibility for their own safety to others.  You cannot buck the physics & biology of the situation however much you might like to.  Result: those that try get hurt!We all have responsibility to look after our own safety all of the time.BTW – whilst I’m on the subject of being seen – I understand that it is no longer illegal to sport flashing lights on your bike, but cyclists should be under no illusion that it makes them easier to be seen if their lights are flashing.  It doesn’t!This is why the authorities rejected the idea of flashing lights for so many years.  Again, as a car driver, I can advise that cyclists sporting constant lights are much easier to see – especially in London, where there are so many other visual distractions in the driver’s eye-line at all times.  By all means carry additional lights which flash, but never as your sole light.  Having white lights which flash at the front are even worse – especially with some of the very high powered LED models now coming onto the market – as they have a tendency to render the oncoming driver blind for the duration thus increasing the risks for all concerned until they pass.

Tony Colliver ● 5185d