Forum Topics

council fined by LGO for housing and compaints maladministration

Council found guilty of “severe maladministration” in respect of housing and its complaints procedure. No news to me and my neighbours.  We recall the horrors of the time the Council was operating a hostel at 354-6 Uxbridge Road - contrary to planning regulations.  More recently council officer Mark Wiltshire relicensed a landlord as “a fit and proper person” to hold a licence on a large HMO when he knew he had been housing tenants in filth and fire hazard (walls damp and mouldy, smoke alarm taped over, fire escape route blocked with old furniture and rubbish), and knew he was failing to prevent his tenants causing antisocial nuisance in the neighbourhood.   Shocking.  More shocking:  Wiltshire still has his job.  The complaints procedure?  We complained about him. It was dealt with by Helen Harris, Director legal and Democratic Services.  Required to respond within twenty days, she procrastinated for nearly five months!  The Council apologised for her “unacceptable” behaviour.  The complaint passed to officer Alison Reynolds. Before we had had a chance to request escalation, she had already refused to escalate the complaint. “I would like to advise you that the Council will no longer enter into any more correspondence with you or your associates”.  It was our right to request escalation. She corrupted due process, Shocking.  More shocking. She still has her job. History has repeated itself and will go on doing so under Mason.  He asked residents to email him with concerns about the borough.  I emailed him about this.  He ignored the email.  

Andrew Farmer ● 1393d1 Comments ● 1387d

Public Open Space Covenants & Stipulations on Council-held land

In the neighbouring London Borough of Hillingdon (our Prime Minister - The Right Hon. Boris Johnson's constituency), the Leader of the Labour Group of Councillors made the following Motion at Cabinet on 13th January 2022."That this Council believes that restrictive covenants on public & communal land plays an important role in ensuring that the value and enjoyment of the land is, and continues to be, preserved. Restrictive covenants enhance and protect our borough for our residents’ benefit and that of future generations.This Council, therefore, believes that it should set the example and do all within its power to uphold restrictive covenants especially on council land.This Council, therefore, calls on the Cabinet to abolish their current plans to remove the restrictive covenant in Yiewsley in order to develop on the recreation ground and library site.This Council calls on the Cabinet to enter into dialogue with local residents to devise alternative options for the use of the land in Yiewsley that complies with the restrictive covenants put in place to preserve the enjoyment and benefit for Hillingdon residents.Furthermore, this Council commits to uphold restrictive covenants across the borough for the benefit of residents."The above declaration in the Motion is reminiscent of the admirable Manifesto Pledge made by Cllr. John Cudmore, former Acton Councillor and the Leader of the Labour Group in Ealing at the time of his party's successful efforts to win the administration control of Ealing Council in May 1994 at the local 4-yearly election promising that the Council would respect the views of residents and protect the borough's conservation areas and green spaces from backland developments, etc.Victor Mishiku  16/1/2022"The Covenant Movement" Ealing.

Victor Mishiku ● 1389d2 Comments ● 1387d

The continuing tragedy of Gunnersbury Park

Neglected by two boroughs who could not manage to tie a shoe-lace together for decades, handed over in an appallingly formulated way to a Cop-out CIC, then packed out with Cronies of like mindsets and connections, a TfL approach to funding where even a tuft of grass is fiscally overpricedSome good stuff, but from a a lot of grant funding which is unaccounted for and overseen with sort of knowledge that would make an IKEA shelf priced at £2500 plus fitting seem "very reasonable". Much core infrastructure for a public park remains as poor as it has been for 25 plus years. A complete contradiction to 'Community Interest Company " and with not even a freedom of information clause - which needless to say this management wriggled out of. Because it's overseers, both Trustees and Councils, deemed it irrelevant.Even a Velcro shoe strap is too challenging for this CIOC who only know how to bully and manipulate with help from their 'friends'Loss of cheap affordable to all public park amenities and replaced by exclusivity with a patronising faux front of inclusivity.Change is welcome, but that will only be change for the better if ALL the existing league of cronies and those at the trough are not involved in any form.  A completely new broom of more open and honest management put in place properly answerable to the local people of Ealing, Acton and Brentford who seem to be considered as irrelevant unless they can afford it. Community groups must be on the board and as trustees, not just selected politicians and 'preferred' individuals.Local people, not council officers with close connections, or politicians who seem to have failed with Gunnersbury time and time again, need to be far more in control of a Park that was purchased at a knock down price on the premise that it was for the well being of All the local people of Ealing Acton Brentford and Chiswick.Will this be any better? With how things are carried out in our name?I doubt it. It seems more like another move to making it a pay to enter venue like Syon or Kew and not what it is supposed to be, a Public park owned in trust by two boroughs for it's inhabitants

Raymond Havelock ● 1405d1 Comments ● 1404d

Freedom of Information Refused by Ealing

I have strong reason to feel that the courts are partisan and are assisting Ealing Council in getting their way in court cases . ( at least with pricate individuals ) so i asked Ealing if they could provide me with some simple data FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT 2000 - INFORMATION REQUESTThank you for your Freedom of Information request received by the Council on 13th December 2021.Your request:• What percentage of court cases Ealing win and lose and where these court cases areheld?• The names of the deputy district judges and judges who hear your cases• I would also like to know how many court cases you instigate and how many courtcases are instigated against you.Your request has been assessed and the following information is provided in response:This information is not recorded. It would take longer than 18 hours to answer this request, due to theneed to peruse hundreds of files from many different council departments. Note that it is not just thelegal team that deal with legal proceedings brought against the council; many departments (eg.Insurance, housing, planning) deal with many cases independently. Some non-legal teams also onoccasion bring proceedings on behalf of the council.the reason for my request was to see if Ealing was given special treatment and if certain judges were given the cases related to the borough it seems a reasonable FOI request to me because my own experience suggests networking between Ealing Council and the judges who fail to act with impartiality and have ethnic and political links with the Councils senior leadership

P Taylor ● 1414d11 Comments ● 1406d

Is this ok?

I recently had a remote hearing at Brentford County court , Ealing Council won £1600 based upon their claim taht there is no law that requires the council to respond to a local resident . this means that according to the judge absolutely NOBODY has any actual right to a response regardles sof the topic . i regard this as a denial of basic justice . after the hearing I went online and discovered that the Judge Michael Shelton was a co religionist of the Councils lawyer and indeed the leader of Ealing Council . I am no legal expert but where there are significant political and religious links I would have thought it would be prudent to avoid any possibility of favouritism. I had emailed the editor of Ealing today but got no reply . Ealing Council have all kinds of stated policies on treating residents with respect that they violate , the new leader Peter Mason ( he probably is) claimed that his administration would be open and transparent and that is absolutely not the case . The council have an exprert legal team and very warm relations with Brentford Court , i have submitted a FOI request to ask what percentage of Ealings court cases are won and lost . in my opinion the small claims court should be a simple straightforward method for average people to get justice but in reality it is a minefield of corruption, legalese, jargon , how the hell can I who brought the case because i have been IGNORED for 6 years be given costs to the wealthy council of £1600 in the SMALL CLAIMS COURT based upon the idea that no law is actually some sort of law and using obscure civil procedure rules . so far a couple of people have been helpful but i am determined not to allow Ealing Council to get away with this and you should help me because the idea that teh council can legally ignore us must be absolutely unacceptable in a so called democracy and that there must be no overt links between the politicians and the judges as was in this case , you are welcome to call me on 07396534522 Paul

P Taylor ● 1418d9 Comments ● 1415d

Sadiq Khan is misusing our money 

Khan is giving £25,000 grants to help people 'decolonise' their street names, part of his million-pound Untold Stories fund, which was “inspired by the BLM protests”. The protests, let us not forget, saw a female police officer injured when one of the defund-the-police activists threw a bottle at her and were inspired by the death of a drug-fuelled armed black burglar who terrorised a woman in her home, yes, good old Georgie Floyd. Renaming a road requires a consultation.   It is a two-sided affair.  Why is Khan, in fairness, not funding those who oppose the renaming?  His obligation is to represent not only people who voted for him but all residents of London.  This is a politically biased and when its detail is examined a racially-discriminatory handout that favours the interest of one section of the community. It was redundant as far as Ealing is concerned.  As soon as Khan first introduced this scheme, Julian Bell was up at dawn, tongue in Khan’s anus, suggesting a specific road-name change, Havelock Road in Southall.  No one there had requested or paid for the change, but the council had heard that people wanted it and so adopted the proposal. The protocol applicable at the time did not permit the name-change so the Council changed it allow it to go ahead. This dishonest stratagem was endorsed by the Cabinet.  Of course. Back to Khan.  This is the man who referred to the “passing” of Sir David Amess as if he died peacefully in his sleep. Nick Price of the Crown Prosecution Service has stated: "We will submit to the court that this murder has a terrorist connection, namely that it had both religious and ideological motivations.”  Which religion would that be?  Is there something embarrassing to Khan in what happened so that he disrespectfully to the memory of David Amess tries to make light of its the horror?  Khan has embarked upon a scheme to undermine our culture and rewrite our history.  Whatever the merits of that, the question is what does he want to replace it with?  One founded on the culture of his ancestral homeland?   I do not want to live in Pakistan-on-Thames.

Andrew Farmer ● 1467d34 Comments ● 1443d

Action against Ealing Council December 7th

i am attempting to get justice against Ealing Council who for 6 years have been ignoring my on topic emails and calls relating to housing issues , the argument that Ealing give is that there is no law that obliges them to respond, how can a council obtain money from local ratepayers without an obligation to reply . do you agree with Ealing council , please note that I am not attempting to locate a missing cat , my emails are about vital housing issues and negligance by the council that have harmed me personally . This matter has been escalated via the official complaints procedures and I had previously been given esacalation reference numbers none of which resulted in any action , My local councillor Anthony Young who is well past retirement age and has out of date details on his landing page also refused to respond fact is that with the exception of bin emptying, street cleaning and parks which at least down my way are well done . i also note a point made by the excellent Andrew Farmer that the promises of new council leader Peter Mason are just empty rhetoric and hot air . there is no point in pretending to make a fresh start after the atrocious Julian Bell and then simply duplicate his policies . anyway if any of you who have experience with Ealing Council would like to asisst me my contact number is 07396534522 and please can you state publicly if you agree that Ealing Council can legally be allowed to ignore the legitimate correspondence of local residents and ratepayers

P Taylor ● 1456d4 Comments ● 1453d

Ealing Independents announces Southall Candidate to compete against Peter Mason.

I have nothing to do with Ealing Independents, just thought folk would like to be aware:-EALING INDEPENDENTS ANNOUNCES SOUTHALL CANDIDATE TO COMPETE AGAINST CURRENT EALING LABOUR AND COUNCIL LEADER PETER MASON IN THE WARD OF SOUTHALL GREEN FOR THE MAY 2022 EALING COUNCIL ELECTIONSDate: 26/10/2021 10:00From: Ealing Independents PRESS RELEASEEALING INDEPENDENTS ANNOUNCES SOUTHALL CANDIDATE TO COMPETE AGAINST CURRENT EALING LABOUR AND COUNCIL LEADER PETER MASON IN THE WARD OF SOUTHALL GREEN FOR THE MAY 2022 EALING COUNCIL ELECTIONSEaling Independents (www.EalingIndependents.com), the grassroots group founded by Ealing resident Leslie Bunder is delighted to announce the first of its many candidates who will be standing for Ealing Independents in the forthcoming May 2022 Ealing elections.These independent candidates will represent their local community and are the first of many to be standing across all towns of Ealing which include Acton, Ealing, Greenford, Hanwell, Northolt, Perivale, and Southall.(Ealing, London, UK – October 26, 2021) – Ealing Independents (www.EalingIndependents.com), the grassroots group standing up for all Ealing residents, is proud to announce that members of the public who wish to improve the lives of their local communities in towns such as Southall are to stand as candidates in their local wards in the May 2022 Ealing elections.These independent candidates, as councillors, will ensure that all Ealing residents and businesses in its seven towns (Acton, Ealing, Greenford, Hanwell, Northolt, Perivale, Southall) have better services to improve life in Ealing and make it better, safer, cleaner and greener.Unlike the current leader of Ealing Council, Labour's Peter Mason who doesn’t live in the ward he is councillor for and has failed to hold any resident surgeries (including virtual) for over a year despite having a contract to do so, Ealing Independents councillors live and are a part of community the wards they will represent.“I moved to Southall Green fifteen years ago. I live with my wife and two young children, who attend school and nursery in Southall,” says Southall Green resident and candidate for councillor David Marsden.“I’ve worked in Southall for the last six years supporting better neighbourhoods in West London, and Southall in particular.”“I’ve been a leading campaigner in the fight for Clean Air for Southall and Hayes, and I’ve opposed the unsafe development of the highly toxic old Gasworks site at Council meetings and community protests.”Marsden added: “I’ve been an active local Labour party member since 2019. Ordinary Labour party members and a few councillors have always shown solidarity and offered practical help. But we have all been blocked from changing anything for the better by former Ealing Labour Council Leader Julian Bell and his successor Peter Mason, who is also an elected councillor for Southall Green ward. Both are very much on the right wing of the party, and only interested in serving their own interests, not the interests of the people of Southall, whose votes they take for granted.”“Both Bell and Mason accepted over £30,000 in gifts and hospitality from the Gasworks developers, yet refused to openly and transparently declare their financial interests at the public meeting in 2019. Mason, as chair of that meeting, tried to prevent me from speaking to reveal that one of the chemicals being dug up at the Gasworks site, and one of the main causes of the bad smell, is potentially fatal to some people with Asian and African genetic heritage.”“Instead of standing up for residents in his own council ward, Mason took time off to get a Masters degree in Town Planning. Now we are faced with tower blocks going up everywhere, 10,000 new homes, 40,000 new residents and their cars. No wonder they want us all to get on our bikes!”“It’s clear that Mason’s and Labour’s priorities are not in the best interests of Southall residents. It’s time to tell Mason and Labour to get on their bikes, and get out of Southall!”“If elected as an Ealing Independents councillor, I will stand up and make sure that the voices of Southall people are heard in the Council Chamber and elsewhere. I will fight for the rights of Southall people to live, work, learn and play in a cleaner, safer Southall that we can all be proud to call home. I will always be open to listen to people’s problems, concerns, ideas and suggestions in person, by phone, text, email, WhatsApp, Twitter, Facebook and any other means where possible. I will make sure Southall people’s views are represented.”ABOUT EALING INDEPENDENTSSince launching in February 2021 with the sole aim to support all residents and stand up for them, Ealing Independents has focused on ensuring that local people have a party that puts them first.Ealing Independents candidates will give residents something that national political parties do not offer – elected councillors putting the interests of residents ahead of their own self-interest or national party interest.Ealing Independents is committed to ensuring it creates and delivers the borough’s first and only people’s manifesto.This manifesto involves Ealing Independents actively listening to residents and local businesses across the borough and its seven towns to ensure that as a council it follows what the people need – a council that listens to them, helps them, and ensures they are protected.Ealing Independents is the party that loves Ealing, and its councillors will ensure residents are never ignored.All residents in Ealing are invited to submit their thoughts of their priorities for a better Ealing at hello@ealingindependents.com where the party will read every email and listen to the feedback.Among the failures to Ealing residents since 2010, Ealing Labour has:Fought against Southall residents who suffer toxic air from the Southall gasworks development by not taking action against developers and hiding information that advises of the issues causing toxic air.Failed for years to pay Ealing Schools catering staff a Living Wage despite the council claiming to be a Living Wage employer.Poorly engaged with residents instead of creating and ensuring a partnership is developed to improve roads for all users, including cars, bikes and pedestrians in order to unite communities to work together and tackle climate change.Closed youth centres and deprived young people of safe and secure facilities to meet, socialise and develop as citizens.Allowed tower buildings to be approved without listening to local residents and creating architectural and environmental eyesores as well as not helping to provide council homes. These buildings are put up without consideration for the need for services, such as GPs and schools to accommodate residents’ needs.Allowed many of its councillors to ignore residents, not respond to their enquiries and fail to provide meaningful actions to help their wards and those living in it.Poorly maintained public pavements and roads making it difficult for disabled as well as able bodied to get out.Allowed trees to over-grow on pavements along with an increase of refuse on footpaths making them a hazard to walkersClosed recycling refuse centres making it difficult for residents to get to them, and resulting in an increase in fly tipping.For more information on Ealing Independents, email: hello@ealingindependents.com or call 07862 748611.You can also visit our website: www.ealingindependents.comor follow us on Twitter at @ealingindys   - www.Twitter.com/EalingIndysEaling Independentsweb: www.EalingIndependents.comtwitter: www.twitter.com/EalingIndysemail: hello@EalingIndependents.comtel: 07862 748611Ealing Independents is a grassroots group exploring the opportunity for independent candidates to be elected in May 2022 and make Ealing better for all.

Rosco White ● 1471d10 Comments ● 1456d

Transparecy and openess promised by Council Leader Peter Mason, or is it censorship?

Peter Mason, when he become Council Leader, said on Tuesday 18th May 2021 that, "I will lead an open, inclusive and transparent council, that engages local people in the challenges we face" (source: Ealing Today 20/05/2021). Yet I would like to bring to your attention an example of Ealing Council's censorship. When submitting comments/objections to planning applications on the council planning portal, Ealing Council are applying moralistic political censorship, which seems to show them to be wilfully ignorant of past history. On 2nd November 2021, I submitted my objection to Planning Application 215857FUL, the developer's land grab of Friary Place Green. I was the 208th commentator at 11.03pm. On the next day, 3rd November, I looked through the planning portal comments page, and my comments/objections that I submitted had been taken down. This led me to re-submit my comments at 12.39pm, as commentator 222, after someone at W12 0RF. These comments/objections were taken down/censored when I looked at around 1.30pm. All this suggests that the present Ealing Council leadership seem predetermined to approve of this land grab by developer Catalyst/Mount Anvil. My second submission to the Ealing Council planning portal, which is almost identical to my first submission. The only difference is instead of Hitler, I wrote H....r, and instead of Friary Park Estate, I changed the capital "E" into a lower case "e".All this led me to copy my second submission and put it on the ActonW3.com discussion forum under the "Catalyst and Mount Anvil attempt Common Lands Grab through dubious planning application" topic/thread. Below is the text of my first submission to Planning Application 215857FUL. Thanks.  Friary Place Green is Common Land, its derogation cannot be changed without a formal consultation carried out by the Council. A Consultation has not taken place. The Council should be protecting Common Land for the people, and not letting others who do not own it redevelop it for their own profits.  "Salami Slicing Imperialism", that Adolf Hitler practised before World War Two is being applied at local level by the developer, Catalyst and Mount Anvil. "One Man", i.e. the developer is trying to impose his will on the thousands of residents, and objectors, that live in the local area. Why is Ealing Council being feckless towards the "salami slicing" of the peoples' Common Land - Friary Place Green, by greedy avaricious developer.  Please do not let Ealing Council be a malleable Quisling, Chaim Rumkowski or a Vichy Republic lackey collaborator for the avaricious developer. Catalyst and Mount Anvil should have planned for the children's play area and cycle hub on the Friary Park Estate that they are redeveloping into an over dense battery council tax farm. Among other things in this redevelopment, they want to erect a 37 and a 29 storey death trap tower blocks. They should not be allowed to parasite on land that they do not own for their own profit desires. Please protect the peoples' Common Land - Friary Place Green, and the environment in general, and reject planning application 215857FUL.

Anthony Hawran ● 1461d7 Comments ● 1456d

FREE CONFIDENCE COURSE (includes one week self-defence) @REYNOLDS SPORTS CENTRE

A local training academy is offering female residents the chance to participate in their FREE six-week confidence building course (includes one week of self-defence) for free. The course aims to give the participants more independence and learn new techniques.Starting Saturday, 13th November 2021, the course held from 11.00am to 1.00pm and is open to women and girls aged 14 years and older who are looking to learn skills to protect themselves and build confidence.This is the eight occasion Sev Necati Training has offered the courses and based on the feedback received, places will be booked quickly.Read below feedback from participants of last year’s course:“I feel very empowered and strong, really inspired and ready. You will grow, gain independence, grow in strength and be able to help others. I really appreciated the opportunity. I feel very lucky and responsible to help others,” Bethany-Anne said.“I’ve never done a course like this before and wanted to know what it was about. It was brilliant, very fun yet professional. Do it! Every girl and woman should do it,” Virginia said."Reynolds Sports Centre in Acton, West London has hosted several Course’s which also includes self-defence training for women and girls 13 years old upwards. These funded classes in conjunction with the Met Police and MOPAC to name but a few are run by Sev Necati Training. Sev’s classes are professionally run and are expertly delivered and increase confidence in everyone who attends.Reynolds Sports Centre and Everyone Active are proud to host and assist with the running of Sev’s classes in the West London area." General Manager, L.CurtainSev Necati, director, said: “We’re delighted to be running another free course in Ealing. This is a great opportunity for women and girls who want to increase their independence and confidence to take advantage of this offer. The course will provide practical techniques, regardless of their background, age or ability which will include one week in self-defence training and vital knowledge on street safety. At the end of the course participants will feel empowered, more confident and improvement in self-worth.”Sign upThere is one course being offered this time on Saturday from 13th November 2021 to Saturday 18th December 2021.  Held from 11:00am to 1:00pm.Held at Reynolds Sport Centre, Ark Acton Academy, Gunnersbury Lane, W3 8EY. A £10.50 deposit is required to secure a place, which will be returned at the end of the course.For more information and to book your place, email info@sevnecatitraining.comYou must contact Sev on the above e-mail address to book a place and for further information

Sev Necati ● 1471d0 Comments ● 1471d

Restrictive Covenant Breach - Compensation of £224,000 awarded to Ealing neighbours

In March 2018, I was contacted by residents of Elmcroft Close, which is adjacent to 59 Eaton Rise, Ealing W5. This was in connection with a new planning application for a substantial 3-Storey extension to the Victorian house plus a smaller outbuilding in the rear garden. The detached Victorian house at No.59 has a large rear garden which some 28 years ago was subject to several unsuccessful attempts to carry out backland development by the then owner, Mr Richard Millett, on the back of his garden. The Planning Committee refused the application and a subsequent appeal was dismissed by The Planning Inspectorate in Bristol. At that time we were fighting purely on planning grounds. On this occasion in March 2018, I also investigated if there might be a restrictive covenant of any assistance to the Objectors. Eventually after a determined campaign by the Objectors, planning permission was granted by Ealing Council for the new development in February 2020 to convert the property from 2 flats into 7 self-contained flats. The Restrictive Covenant was created in the mid-1960s and stipulated what could be built at the rear of No.59 which included the former boundary wall. Although the wall was replaced by a fence long ago, the covenant limited any new building to that of the original wall-height at that time. Subsequently, this was estimated to be about a metre high. The proposed 3-Storey rear extension would of course be very substantially higher this modest wall and therefore was in clear breach of the Restrictive Covenant. The neighbours raised this issue with the developer and eventually having received planning permission in February last year, the developer subsequently made an Application to the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) for a modification of the Restrictive Covenant so as the permit the extension and outbuilding. The original proposal was for 8 flats but this had been replaced by a revised planning application for 7 flats in October 2018. After a Hearing of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) on 27th & 28th July 2021, the Tribunal Member, Chartered Surveyor Ms Diane Martin MRICS FAAVA, decided to allow the proposed modification of the Restrictive Covenant but ON TERMS. The terms are according to the 28-page Decision of the Upper Tribunal (Lands Chamber) which can be read in full on the Internet is that in order to obtain the proposed Modification, the developer, Mr Emil Moskofian, must pay a total sum of £224,000 to 11 Objectors who reside in the houses at Elmcroft Close (No.1-11) as Compensation. The highest award was of £40,000 to one Objector and the lowest £8,000; five others were awarded £16,000 each and four more were awarded £24,000 each. In past days, the Tribunal might have even turned the application down as the compensation is quite large. This is the third highest award of Compensation in a Middlesex covenant case I know of. In this borough, the highest was £350,000 (flats instead of private dwellinghouses), in Wembley £230,000 for a school building on a playing field where houses are anyway allowed but never built). I note with satisfaction that on page 9 of the Decision, Ms Martin stated with regard to a precedent having been set by their lack of previous objection to height above the boundary of the garden trees, and construction of the first floor balcony, that the objectors originally “were unaware of the covenant until alerted to it by a neighbour in March 2018…“ That neighbour (myself) was able to assist the residents at the start of their battle due to long experience with Restrictive Covenants since our first ever case in December 1986 - March 1991 at 8 Longfield Road Ealing W5 (which took 4 years in the High Court and Lands Tribunal - the longest single covenant case ever fought in Ealing with 6 days in court) preventing a major backland development behind the sequence of gardens of houses in Longfield Road, Castlebar Road and Gordon Road on the “Hanger Hill Estate, Ealing” and the proposed use of the garden of 8 Longfield Road as a Vehicular Access Road after demolition of the red-bricked 1883 dwellinghouse built by James Wills, who lived at 43 Castlebar Road. This lends some weight to the words of a past Tribunal Member that the benefit of a restrictive covenant may be found “like hidden treasure in the hour of need”. Finally, I am glad that I did not take Mr Richard Millett’s advice some 27 years ago when he wrote to me telling me to “go back to Japan and save Tokyo”. Victor Mishiku 29/9/2021 “The Covenant Movement”

Victor Mishiku ● 1497d8 Comments ● 1476d

Backgarden development refused tonight at Committee

I attended the Planning Committee tonight at Ealing Town Hall.  I have been doing so for the last 35 years now.I was interested in the case at 1 Golden Manor W7 which is both in a Conservation Area and faces an adjoining Conservation Area and a small Public Open Space (the "Rose Garden").  In 2017 & 2018, I assisted neighbours fight off a previous worse proposal (which was being recommended for granting by the Planning Department) as on this occasion tonight.Upon arrival, I asked to see the Agenda for the 10 items under discussion.  The Committee Clerk gave me her only copy (and there were 9 members of the public there including former MP, Stephen Pound).  The 1 Golden Manor application was listed as Item 10 on the Agenda but the Agenda I was given only went up to Item 3 (last page 185).On reading the index, I realised that there are supposed to be 264 pages and the ones I wanted to read were pages 219 - 264 but they were all missing!    I was able to read the "Briefing Notes" which were placed on the public seats right at the end of the Victoria Hall (away from the loudspeaker) and straight away I noticed a fatal error in them where the Planning Department had come to the bizarre conclusion that the garden at 1 Golden Manor was "previously-developed" land - in fact it is "Greenfield" as residential gardens in built-up areas are now designated as "Greenfield" since 9th June 2010 when the law was changed to protect green open spaces.  This is not the first time a senior planner has made this mistake (uncorrected by her Area Manager, Ms Alex Jackson - as occurred in another case in W13 as Cllr. Mahmood may recall).After the Objectors' representative addressed the Committee very fully and after they then heard from the developer party, the Members of the Planning Committee discussed the application which Ward Councillor Ray Wall (Chair of the Planning Committee) had called in.I was very impressed by the comments of many of the Committee Members who were not afraid to question the recommendation of the Case Officer who was wholly in favour of the development.A number of the Members expressed concern about the inadequate plot size of the proposed development, the loss of garden land especially when "climate change" is much to the fore these days, actual harm to the Conservation Area and the fact that the proposed development would be out of keeping with the character of the Conservation Area and its original carefully laid-out housing and spacious gardens.The acting Chair, Cllr. Tariq Mahmood, called for a vote and the result was 8 - 3 to REFUSE the planning application.Well done to the residents who stood up to the garden-grabbers!Victor Mishiku  Wednesday 21/7/2021"The Covenant Movement"  vmfree@madasafish.com

Victor Mishiku ● 1567d8 Comments ● 1479d

LTNs gone - but a more fundamental issue.....

The LTNs may (mostly) be gone but like other British politicians in history many Ealing councillors failed to understand the political climate of the day. After over 16 months of restrictions the last thing people wanted was more control and more restrictions - they want their freedoms and their normal way of life back. But whether or not you believed that Low Traffic Neighbourhoods were a good or a bad idea, and notwithstanding any policy from central Government or finance from TfL, whether it’s the LTN fiasco or other issues such as high rise towers or Victoria Hall  the whole saga is symptomatic of a more fundamental issue. That is:  the abuse of position and the erosion of democracy.  With their dogma and their own political agenda they become arrogant, don’t listen, think they know better than the people, and that residents should subscribe to their world view. Driven more by party political agenda than respect for the wishes of the local community, they have lost touch with the residents they are supposed to represent. Ill-thought-out policies alienate local residents, creating an anger and resentment which in itself does not promote a healthy and harmonious community. There are a few very good councillors, but generally our party political system does not produce competent individuals suitable for running a local community for the benefit of its residents. As the respected linguist, historian and political activist Noam Chomsky observed, there are always those prepared to reduce our democracy in order to further their agenda. The same people are still in council and there remains an existential threat to our communities and our democracy. But whatever your political persuasion, residents should remain vigilant else there is the risk of more of a ‘Culture of Control’ and an increasingly authoritarian administration. Local communities do not need party agenda driven politicians. Local communities do need honest and trustworthy people as councillors, who are competent, without party-political ideology, and who listen to the local residents who elect them to office to represent their majority wishes. Certain councillors may not like it, but it’s called democracy. Councillors are our local public servants, not our masters - they are not in power, they are in office at our sufferance. They might do well to remember this. 

Mike Davidson ● 1491d85 Comments ● 1482d

Croydon: Borough’s voters choose directly-elected Mayor system in referendum

Support for a change in the governance arrangement was overwhelming (by DAVE HILL)Croydon Council will be led by a directly-elected Mayor (DEM) in future after voters expressed a strong preference for switching to the mayoral system at a local referendum held yesterday.Of the 58,897 people who cast votes, an overwhelming 47,165 chose to adopt a mayoral model, while only 11,519 opted to retain the current leader-and-cabinet set-up, under which the council leader is elected by fellow councillors rather than by voters. Turnout was 21 per cent.The referendum was held after a petition raised by pro-DEM campaigners last year secured enough signatures of borough electors, five per cent of them, to require the plebiscite to take place.The leader of the Labour-run council at the time, Tony Newman, was opposed to switching to the mayoral system. However, following Newman’s departure a year ago amid severe financial problems at the borough, his successor, Hamida Ali, took a more conciliatory approach.Hackney, Lewisham, Newham and Tower Hamlets have had directly-elected Mayors since early this century, and governance referendums held in the latter two boroughs in May saw local electors vote strongly in favour of retaining them.The workings of the mayoral system can vary, however, with power concentrated in the hands of a Mayor or devolved to councillors in different ways and to differing degrees. Croydon Council says its Mayor will appoint a cabinet and delegate powers to it “so that decisions are made collectively, as at present under the leader/cabinet model.”Both the mayoral and the leader-and-cabinet arrangements are termed executive models of governance, with most decision-making powers held at cabinet level.Labour in Croydon has been divided over the governance question, with local MPs Steve Reed and Sarah Jones opposed to adopting the mayoral system while key activists in the south of the borough have favoured it, along with Croydon South Conservative MP Chris Philp.The referendum petition was supported by a political coalition embracing Labour, a former UKIP candidate and residents’ groups unhappy with the “growth borough” policies of the council under Newman, particularly its enthusiasm for more house-building in a borough that has experienced a rapid population increase.Advocates argued that candidates seeking to become Mayor will have an interest in seeking support across the whole of the borough and tailoring policies accordingly, rather than concentrating their efforts on electoral wards they know they can win. Criticisms of the pro-DEM campaign have included claims that it is motivated by a desire to prevent more homes being built in affluent areas.SOURCE: https://www.onlondon.co.uk/croydon-boroughs-voters-choose-directly-elected-mayor-system-in-referendum/?utm_campaign=12721421_Key%20Issues%2013%20Oct%202021&utm_medium=email&utm_source=London%20Councils&dm_i=192K,7KNWT,M4M0DR,UU03B,1

Rosco White ● 1484d5 Comments ● 1483d

Failure to Display Public Notice on Planning Application

Ever since Ealing Planning Department stopped sending out Notification Letters giving 21 days in which to respond to planning applications nearby, the system of putting up the yellow Public Notices on lampposts has been less than perfect.Disregarding instances where developers have likely pulled them down, the Planning Department itself has not always acted sensibly to ensure that affected neighbours know what it being proposed at close proximity.In a case in Rotherwick Hill (part of the Haymills Estate in Ealing W5), an unneighbourly play tower & platform was erected without planning permission.  Eventually, planning applications were made but the Council did not put up any Notices in the road where the adjoining back garden of an Ashbourne Close neighbour would be badly affected and where the neighbour had previously complained about the unauthorised structure overlooking their garden.Because no yellow Public Notice was put up in Ashbourne Close, the most affected neighbour was unaware of the latest application and therefore did not write in within the usual 21 days - only finding out that an Appeal to The Planning Inspectorate (PINS) had been lodged months later.   Because the neighbour had not filed an objection at first instance, the rules did not allow her to respond to the Appeal!The writer contacted PINS to explain the situation which was made worse as the Appellant's Planning Consultants were stressing that the neighbour had not objected at first instance and therefore there was no problem!PINS however were not satisfied that natural justice was being observed and ruled that the affected neighbour should be allowed to make her objections.The Appeal was dismissed by PINS yesterday  - please see at:https://www.dropbox.com/preview/AppealDecisionDismissedByPINS.13thMay2021.pdf?role=personalThis result vindicates the objection of the neighbour in Ashbourne Close - the road in which the Planning Department failed to put up a Public Notice!V.Mishiku  - "The Covenant Movement" vmfree@madasafish.com

Victor Mishiku ● 1635d37 Comments ● 1500d

Anyone know anything about the new "Ealing Independents" standing in the next Council Elections?

I have just emailed and asked them if they still exist and what they're doing.Will post the reply here as/when/if I receive one.     😊https://ealingindependents.com/Ealing Independents is a fast growing grassroots group set up by Ealing resident Leslie Bunder to explore the opportunity for independent candidates to contest Ealing local elections.  This is through an umbrella alliance of like-minded people standing united on a shared vision and manifesto, which Ealing Independents is developing for a better, safer, cleaner and greener Ealing for all.These independent candidates will be standing to be councillors to ensure that Ealing residents and businesses get improved and better services to improve life in Ealing and make it better, safer, cleaner and greener.The independent candidates will represent Ealing residents and businesses in Acton, Ealing, Greenford, Hanwell, Northolt, Perivale and Southall.We are not a party at present but have formed a group to support the importance independent candidates can play in local elections.Ealing Independents wants to see Ealing becomes a better place for everyone to live, work and study in.We will work to ensure Ealing becomes a be better, safer, cleaner and greener borough for all.This website serves as an introduction to Ealing Independents and will be updated on a regular basis as we develop our plans.Local independent candidates offer an alternative to the existing political parties who place national politics ahead of local people and issues in Ealing.The next local elections in Ealing for councillors will take place in May 2022.We support and will help create a true local manifesto for Ealing in time for the next election.Before then, we are listening to all residents and businesses across Ealing. We want to ensure the manifesto reflects their needs so that Ealing Council run by independents will provide better services to all.A change of council is needed, as the existing political parties have let down residents and businesses by following their own national party political agendas.Party politics has been allowed to damage Ealing and hurts residents and local businesses alike.We are people from all parts of the community united to making Ealing better after years of not being listened to by the established parties who have shown total disregard to residents and local businesses.Like so many residents and businesses, we are fed up with the way the existing council has been run. It has failed to listen to local people, not been open or transparent and provides very little accountability.We will be challenging the established parties by championing true local candidates who are not influenced by party politics but instead are driven to making Ealing a better place for residents and businesses.Ealing Independents will listen and help in supporting Ealing residents and businesses by seeking to ensure local independent candidates have the opportunity to challenge the established parties.Ealing Independents is all about putting Ealing residents and businesses first and ensuring their needs are represented and their issues are fully addressed to ensure Ealing becomes a better place for all

Rosco White ● 1509d7 Comments ● 1507d

JULIAN BELL HONESTY TEST UPDATE

Julian Bell Honesty Test.  Update. I asked Bell a simple question over a month ago.  It concerned the circumstances in which Mr Najsarek gained employment with Ealing Council?  It was: “Did you already know anything of what appeared in the press on June 30 2016 in respect of Mr Najsarek’s behaviour in Bolton when you appointed him?”  Bell must have known the answer.  All he needed to say was yes or no.   A dilemma.  If he said “yes”, he would reveal that he had been dishonest with the people of Ealing when he praised Najserak’s wonderful record of public service.  If you said “no”, he would confirm that Mr Najserak had successfully deceived his way into Ealing Council.A test of integrity for a public servant!   Not Bell.   He ignored the email.  He was guilty of a LIE BY OMISSION. As an avowed Christian, Bell, I am sure, would have been familiar with the Epistle of St James, the origin of this concept. It was his obligation as a public servant to make himself accountable.  He failed. It is was his obligation as a public servant to be honest.   It is my opinion and allegation (which I believe is supported by the simple evidence of this case) that he is a public liar and, as such, unfit for public office. I have told him to understand that every working day from now on I am asking the same question.  HOW OFTEN WILL JULIAN BELL LIE TO ANDREW FARMER?  FIVE DAYS SO FAR – AND COUNTING.

Andrew Farmer ● 1936d105 Comments ● 1570d

Julian Bell fights back claiming LTNs were popular

Interesting article in the Guardian featuring 'analysis' from Julian Bell about the Mayoral election results and what they tell us about LTNs. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2021/jun/02/cycling-schemes-popular-with-london-voters-analysis-finds He seems to be getting a very obvious dig in at Peter Mason as the Commonplace consultation system presented a very different picture. Although the central claim of the piece, that the LTNs were actually popular and a vote winner for Labour, is nonsense the analysis does raise some very interesting points. You can reach a definitive conclusion about the popularity of LTNs based on Mayoral results. People will have voted on a whole range of issues and, time and time again research has confirmed that national politics determines how a large proportion of people vote in local elections. The LTN wards were also the Remain supporting, predominantly middle class professional wards that did so well across the country for Labour so it is a huge leap to say the result was an endorsement of the former leader's policies particularly as he was actually implementing it in partnership with a Conservative government. However, it cannot be denied that there is no evidence of a significant swing away from Labour as a result of LTNs. While it can't be claimed that the results show that LTNs are popular it also is clear that they aren't the main issue most people in the borough are concerned about at the moment. The only firm conclusion these results can really bring us to is that it is wrong to be distracted by noise made by people on social media.





Gordon Southwell ● 1617d56 Comments ● 1576d

Looking for feedback on real estate project - Under Garden apartments built by Robots

Hello everyone,I am currently on an internship for a company that is looking to help solve a number of problems related to housing in London, many of which have been exacerbated by the COVID pandemic:(1) The availability and affordability of property for those looking to relocate closer to loved ones - made all the more pressing where they may have lost a partner as a result of the pandemic.(2) New ways in which people can release value to their homes without having to sell up.(3) Solutions which might work for those living in one of the many conservation areas in Dulwich and other parts of London.(4) Something that will appreciate in value - as opposed to that of garden buildings that will depreciate over timeThe company has come up with a way (excavation robots and a sinking concrete shell) to create living/working space underground allowing the vast majority of the garden to remain in use. They are starting off by building a self-contained under garden apartment with a sunken courtyard garden, providing natural light to the whole apartment. The apartment should work as a home for elderly parents or grown up kids that would be closer to loved ones and significantly less expensive than trying to buy a property off the open market.What do you think of this idea?What problems do you see or concerns do you have?Is it something that you or someone you know might be interested in?Thank you in advance.

Mira Markova ● 1576d0 Comments ● 1576d

Proposed Uxbridge Road Cycling Measures

I don't travel along this stretch of the Uxbridge Road regularly enough to comment on the proposals which are detailed on the front page with any great authority but the thinking behind them appears sound. It is certainly the case that if you are going to be delayed on this road it will be in the town centres and therefore it doesn't seem to be too unbelievable that the dual carriageways represent spare capacity that can be better used and there is a big win if cycling can be made safer and quicker. It was interesting to learn that 80% of trips along this road are made by bus — presumably this is on a per person basis. What that means is that these changes could go badly wrong if they have an undue impact on bus travel times. The council seem to be saying that the changes will be scrapped if bus travel times are affected 'significantly' but this is not defined. My concern is that the more zealous of the pro-cycling brigade have often tended to quote quite misleading data when it comes to bus travel times when it comes to the recent Streetspace measures. We've seen statistics for whole routes for the whole day and then been told that any delays were minimal. The key data is for travel times within the affected sector of the route during the busiest parts of the day. A five minute delay in rush hour might be evened out over the course of the whole route but that is irrelevant to a bus user who has already got off. On a 20 minute trip that's a 25% increase in travel time which will encourage modal shift. As anyone who has ever used a bus can tell you, relatively short delays can lead to buses becoming very overcrowded very quickly. If the changes make travel slower and less comfortable for 80% of the users of the route then they are going to switch to other modes of transport but not all will take up cycling and many will use cars. In this case you risk the situation entering a vicious cycle — pun not intended — in which more traffic leads to fewer people using the bus. To avoid this the council needs to accurately survey the opinions of bus users and drivers and treat the data honestly not cherry picking to present an argument for a pre-determined course of action.



Gordon Southwell ● 1588d56 Comments ● 1577d

Are Ealing, Hounslow and TfL conspiring?

Most LTN streets and former streets as well as distributor and main roads have been installed with basic road monitoring cables. installed by A-T-R Ltd of York St W1.However the nature or indeed the instigator of this survey seems to be rather clouded and so far to glean any information requires a Freedom of Information enquiry.  Enquiries to both LBH and LBE have so far resulted in no response whatsoever.All the installations in both Ealing and Brentford were at the same time.  But several streets in remaining LTNs that have had steep increases in local traffic levels just trying to get in and out of their neighbourhoods have been omitted.But it all points to TfL, who also do not wish to discuss " matters of internal confidential and commercial nature". Rather odd.However what kind of survey results will clickers get?South ealing Road still has road works causing disruption, currently additional resurfacing adding to that.Swyncome Avenue remains closed with no sign of the roadworks that would render it impassable in both directions.Windmill Roads 1 week closure now has signs saying 8 weeks at both locations.Several small streets like Trent Ave have had road closed signs with minuscule works which would never require closure. ROAD CLOSED signs all over South Ealing placed where there are no closure and incorrect as it's only from 8pm but causing all manner to traffic to deviate unnecessarily.Areas where road works are causing excessive and extensive delays and exacerbated by LTN blockades not having them temporarily removed to allow even local resident access.Yet the very reason for the removal of LTN 21 was for that very problem.It's either monumental incompetence by Highways executives or is it a deliberate bit of gerrymandering to create a false picture and maximise traffic problems?Either way with all this created disruption, it's simply not going to make any survey have and credibility or valid illustration.So have these authorities, smarting from the backlash now resorting to subversive tactics and collusion?

Raymond Havelock ● 1607d2 Comments ● 1605d

Mass vaccination at Twickenham Stadium tomorrow

On Bank Holiday Monday, Twickenham Rugby Stadium will be turned into the biggest vaccination venue so far in North West London, covering residents of Brent, Ealing, Hammersmith & Fulham, Harrow, Hillingdon, Hammersmith & Fulham, Hounslow, Kensington & Chelsea and WestminsterUp to 15,000 vaccinations ready to be administered on the day both appointments and walk ins availableThis vaccination event, Let’s Tackle Covid, will give eligible residents (age 30+) the opportunity to have their first dose of the vaccination without delay. This is in response to an increase in the number of cases of coronavirus in the areaThe event will take place from 10am to 8pm on Monday 31 May at Twickenham StadiumAccording to Chelsea and Westminster Hospital who are organising the event the Pfizer vaccine will be used. For first dose only. It will take place in the open air but under coverIf you have one, remember to bring your NHS number with you. This makes registration faster if you have itSome car parking spaces are available at Rosebine Car Park (entry via A316/Chertsey Road).Disabled parking bays and pickup/drop-off points are located at Twickenham Stadium (entry via Rugby Road)Register for an appointment here:https://www.eventbrite.co.uk/e/lets-tackle-covid-surge-vaccination-event-registration-156925312835The full story:https://www.chelwest.nhs.uk/about-us/news/massive-vaccination-twickenham-stadium-bank-holiday-monday

Angie Gray ● 1619d2 Comments ● 1618d

Ealing Labour group imploding?

I’ve heard that a Labour Councillor, Lewis Cox, Hobbayne, resigned last night & his resignation statement doesnt make good reading, this was from another page: It’s now just over three years since I was elected a Labour councillor by the residents of Hobbayne ward. I remember that election night well. It was a huge moment of personal pride for me that the people of the community where I live would put their trust in me to look after their interests. It was also a surprise. There’s still a very real sense that people like me don’t get elected as councillors – that they don’t get elected to very much, really. But back in 2017, when I was first selected as a candidate, there was a real sense of change in the Labour Party. A sense of hope. It became possible to believe that a working-class lad from Yorkshire, working shifts as cabin crew for an airline at Heathrow might not only be able to get elected but might have a voice and something to add within the Ealing Labour Group and Council, which would make a difference and help improve people’s lives.Of course, it wasn’t all plain sailing. The establishment of the Labour Party locally (people who were leaders then and are leaders now) threw every possible obstacle they could find in the way to prevent me – and members like me – from becoming candidates, let alone councillors. I will admit, it made my victory twice as sweet when I managed to dodge those obstacles and, despite not being wanted, getting myself elected as a Labour councillor in Ealing.The only benefit to that, as far as I can tell was that it allowed me to join Labour Group with eyes wide open – to know that I’d be met with disinterest, if not open hostility, and that I’d be forever consigned to the back benches, at least until the time that I promised my vote to a candidate for Labour Group leader who did not deserve it. For ours is not a system of meritocracy, where the most qualified or most experienced are put in the Cabinet or gifted roles with responsibility-so that we might best serve the interests of residents. No – it was when I joined, and remains tonight, a system very much based on patronage, back-room deals and cronyism.I’m afraid that has very much been my experience of these past three years. Nonetheless, for much of it I have got my head down and done the work required of a ward councillor – looking after the needs of Hobbayne residents. I have tried, when I can, to challenge decisions I think are wrong and to hold the Labour Group leadership and its appointees to account. I have hoped for a time when the situation might change, when we could have a fresh leadership and be better – and do better- than we have for years. Ealing Labour is increasingly a toxic brand. Something had to change. However, not all change is good. That is a realisation that I have come to. And one which I fear the residents of Ealing are about to realise.A week ago, at Labour Group AGM, I was faced with a choice that was really no choice at all. To vote as our leader a person that had done untold damage to the reputation of Ealing Labour for year after year, or to vote for his apprentice – effectively for a person who was no less implicated in many of the bad decisions that have turned residents against us and, worse still, who played a key role in widening the divisions in the Labour Party for factional ends. Members will understand why, in the end, I voted for neither.I’ve spent a lot of time thinking this past week – about my decision but also about the outcome of that vote and what it will mean for Ealing Labour and Ealing Council – none of it good. I’ve reflected too on the bitter disappointment I feel with regard to my fellow councillors – those who didn’t take a principled stand, look at what we were being offered as a choice for Labour Group leader, and see and say ‘No, it’s simply not good enough’. Instead, I see many of those councillors tonight getting rewarded with positions and special responsibility allowances having gifted their vote. Different faces, for sure, but the same old cynical and self-serving practices as before.The easy option for me now, of course, would be to spend the next 12 months sitting quietly on the back benches while continuing to claim my councillors allowance - but for those of you who know me, know that sitting quietly isn’t one of my strengths. I also think it’s about time that one of us was honest with the people we were elected to represent. By continuing to serve under Cllr Mason- I would effectively be endorsing him and his toxic brand of politics and that is not something I am willing to do - so tonight I am informing you that I no longer feel able to serve as a Ealing Labour councillor and will be resigning as a councillor with immediate effect.I don’t regret the decision I am making, but I do regret the causes of it – that when we were presented with the opportunity to pick a new and better leader for Ealing Labour, to improve our performance and our electoral prospects, that we were unable as individuals or as a group to replace the bad with anything better.--ends--

N V Brooks ● 1631d17 Comments ● 1630d

Urgent Rethink Needed onEaling's Neighbourhood Recycling Bins To Be Removed

Big story that will sort out the pseuds among the local councilors. I think it does not come out much more hyper local than this and our green councillors should be jumping up and down to protect their local ahre of the recycling bins in their wards. No action to save them should be seem to translate into no vote in ward elections.Rather than eradicating these bins due to perceived deficiencies in dumping perhpas a consultation period with an independent consultancy to see how the recycling could be got to work.The first of the problems is that of litter bins. Take the Maytrees Rest Garden in South Ealing opposite the tube station, the bins were ALL taken away with the rational (much supported, and endorsed by Philippa Bond) of providing mixed use single bin recycling units which she advocated for the litter instead. Sadly, the point she missed was that most of what the litter bins in the parked received would get you a fine as the recycling bins only deal with specific categories of recyclable waste. So while the cardboard of a Costa Cup is recyclable, the lid is not IN EALING as it is not the right sort of plastic. The same with other LDPE plastic like plastic bags, food wrappers, and even ice lolly sticks. This results in polluted recycling which costs extra to sort and where the lollipop stick is dumping and a fineable offence. Ealing does not recycle LDPE plastic, hard plastic like PVC, polystyrene, plastic bags, and anything black and made out of plastic because the sorting machines cannot identify black plastic objects and process them.The answer to me seems to be to put more bins out there in bigger groups, however, with greater focus , e.g. carpet, mattresses, metal, wood, glass, cardbard, LDPE, HDPE, hard plastic, paper, electricals, engine oil, cooking oil, clothes, shoes and the like. Have something that produces some practical results and also deploy litter bins in parks like the Maytrees Rest Garden - the litter has to go SOMEWHERE after all!

Victor Helm ● 1633d1 Comments ● 1633d

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club and the Sports Hub

We are delighted to see that the Sports Hub is now open. The Bowls Club wishes every success for this enterprise.For the Bowls Club, the photograph in the article is particularly poignant in that it features the bowls pavilion and bowls green. The statements from officers of LB Hounslow and LB Ealing talk of delivering "important community, sports and leisure facilities for residents in the local area" and a vision for Gunnersbury Park "where local people can enjoy sport, beautiful green spaces and a rich local history long into the future.."Meanwhile, bowling in Gunnersbury Park is facing extinction after a history of 90 years. The Community Interest Company is bent on ensuring this fate through a policy of intentional neglect.Members and supporters of the Bowls Club have repeatedly been refused access to the site to carry out extremely urgent maintenance to the green. We learned yesterday that an expert and fully accredited third party has also been refused access by the CIC. This party had very kindly offered to carry out maintenance on behalf of the Bowls Club.The planning application from Putt in the Park has yet to be determined by Hounslow Planning Committee. We believe that by the time this decision is made, whether it is to refuse or to permit, the bowls green will be beyond repair.You may, as does the Bowls Club, wonder how it has been possible to arrive at this situation in what is, after all, a public park which was conceived to be for the benefit of the entire community.

Jim Storrar ● 1665d3 Comments ● 1665d

My Heroes Seema Misra and Jo Hamilton

Readers may be able to help. The ladies above were caught-up in the Sub-postmasters scandal in which the accounting computer system and the management failed. This caused Seema to be imprisoned and Jo to have to choose by pleading guilty to false accounting in order to escape the more serious charge of theft. There had been redacting and shredding of data to hide the innocence of these ladies. Those who had done this should go to prison. Why were the police not immediately involved? The possible charge was theft after all and so the police could have taken individuals in the post office management for interfering with the evidence. The police are the gatekeepers of part of the legal system and appear reluctant to become involved in rip-offs by authority. Something similar happened in Ealing when some motorists were not electronically reminded that their CPZ resident parking permit was due for renewal. Some residents were reimbursed but how many were not? And now we have the council charging otherwise law abiding motorists for passing through very unusual LTN barriers. The LBE officers who I spoke to last week at the Culmington Road barrier said that all the signage was in order under the signage legislation (when it wasn't) and I said the message wasn't getting through evidenced by the enormous numbers of motorists being charged. The evidence told the story and one of the officers flounced off. End of meeting. This fraudulent abuse of power and entrapment must stop. The police have to act as it brings all authority into disrepute. Gatekeepers in the police heirarcy and there are many are rejecting this in that it has nothing to do with them. That's not right.

Arthur Breens ● 1688d2 Comments ● 1679d

Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club - Petition

The Gunnersbury Park Community Interest Company has refused to grant access by the Bowls Club to the bowls green to carry out urgent maintenance work.Some readers may wish to sign this petition:https://petitions.hounslow.gov.uk/GPBowlsClub/Our request is that all councillors, whether members of the Planning Committee or not, should seek to use their good offices to persuade the CIC to allow the Bowls Club access to the bowls green.Gunnersbury Estate (2026) Community Interest Company (the CIC) is responsible for the management of Gunnersbury Park on behalf of the joint owners, the London Boroughs of Hounslow and Ealing.In April 2020 a planning application was refused for the conversion of the bowls clubhouse to a cafe/restaurant. In January 2021, a decision on a further, almost identical, planning application was deferred by Hounslow Planning Committee. This proposal would lead to the re-purposing of the bowls green as a mini-golf facility which would mean the end of bowls in Gunnersbury Park after 90 years.In deferring their decision, the Planning Committee wished to have more time to consider all of the relevant facts, including the consideration of alternative sites for the mini-golf facility.The Bowls Club and volunteers from the wider community have been refused access by the CIC to carry out urgent maintenance work. Without this work the bowls green will rapidly deteriorate to a condition beyond repair and this will mean that the Planning Committee will be faced with a situation where bowls is no longer a viable use for the site of the bowls green.The Bowls Club is not opposed to the establishment of a mini-golf facility in the Park. Indeed, it supports the principle of this important source of revenue for the CIC but not at the expense of the bowls green and the Bowls Club itself.

Jim Storrar ● 1706d14 Comments ● 1686d

DISHONEST TRADING.

Misleading information provided by energy switching company Look After My Bills to the public has been addressed by the Advertising Standards Authority. Below is a post shared by Nick Blagg, a member of:                                                                                                                                                                        "Look After My Bills Problem Reporting Page."                                                                                                                                                     Nick Blagg shared a link.The complaint made to the advertising standards agency against LAMB has been upheld !! It feels like a partial victory to me based on what the ruling is (see below) but it’s still a win and the more of us that continue to complain the more pressure is applied.  Keep it up guys. 👍🏻Dear Mr Blagg,Thank you for your continued patience.  Further to the below, we received another complaint which raised issues similar to those highlighted in your complaint.  Based on the information you and the other complainant provided, we considered that advertising content from Look After My Bills was likely to break the advertising rules we apply.  Therefore, we contacted the advertiser to ask for their assurance that future ads do not misleadingly imply that users of the service will have access to every single energy company and every single energy deal on the market.  They have provided this assurance.This now resolves your complaint, and the case will be closed.  Basic information including the advertiser’s name and where the ad appeared will be published on www.asa.org.ukThank you for bringing this matter to our attention.Kind regards,JamesJames JonesComplaints ExecutiveDirect Line 020 7492 2214Please note, I do not work on FridaysAdvertising Standards AuthorityCastle House, 37-45 Paul StreetLondon EC2A 4LSTelephone 020 7492 2222

Neil Milkins ● 1695d0 Comments ● 1695d

Gas and electric suppliers.

ENERGY SUPPLIERS.Because I haven't got a head for figures I have stuck with SSE Swalek for 47 years. But owing to Look After My Bills without my permission signing me up to Utility Point in October 2021, I have had the opportunity to try and figure out which energy provider gives the best deal. I have learned that using switching companies provides the worst deals and leave behind a trail of stress. For instance Look  After My Bills and Utility Point for 4 months have both blamed each other and both have launched an investigation into the mess they have dropped me in. And the situation has not been resolved with 2 BBC consumer programmes investigating hundreds if not thousands of complaints against these 2 companies.My energy provider for 47 years, SSE had suggested that I start off with them as a new customer and on 12-1-21 a contract was agreed with a customer service agent emailing me the following details."Good day Mr Milkins,This is to confirm the effective start date with Swalec-SSE is the 29 January 2021 to take over the gas and electricity supply.This means that you will only be charged from the date mentioned above going forward. All other charges will be applied by your current supplier until the date your supply starts with Swalec-SSE.Thank you.Regards,Yolanda."Hooray. Then I get the following  email from Jolene from SSE on 20-1-20."I understand that you have been sent an email regarding the dates the supply has come back to us and you were advised that you would not have a bill until SSE started [29-1-21], feedback is being provided to that adviser so this incorrect information is not given in the future, for this I can offer a goodwill payment of £30.00 for incorrect information given. SSE can keep their £30 !!!!!!!!!!I have now learned how easy it is to find the cheapest deal for gas and electric. Find a company offering a 2 year fixed tariff which I have done. To date, the best deal offers a 2 year fixed tariff.                                 For gas, the daily standing charge is 27 pence per day. The charge for gas is 2.952 pence per kw hour.For electric, the standing charge is 24.02 pence per day. The charge for electric is 17.42 per kw hour.These prices are considerably cheaper than my former supplier. If anyone can direct me to a better deal, please let me know as haven't signed up to EDF yet.

Neil Milkins ● 1748d5 Comments ● 1715d

Shameful Gunnersbury Park CIC

Surely Ealing and Hounslow Councils need to call an enquiry into just how Gunnersbury Park is being run.Clearly, it is far from interested in being a community organisation but obsessed with their own agenda and rather deluded.The way in which the Bowls club, a long established club accessible for all, at costs that local people can afford, self financing, run and maintained fully by members for the past 25 years as a result of the complete failure of Ealing and Hounslow to maintain this parks facilities for near 50 years is nasty, ageist and wholly conceited.The silence from Ealing Councillors is yet again, underlining how ageist and removed they are from local community.  Hounslow councillors fare little better but at least have become aware that something fishy is going on with this Organisation.Far too many cosy arrangements to be healthy.I understand that somehow, this Organisation is exempt from any form of open access from Freedom of Information to public accountability. And yet they are funded by grants, awards and ultimately source from taxpayers and public money. None of which has found it's way to the Bowls club or other basic aspects of this park.  But above average salaries for those within the CiC and it's associates remain.Truly appalling. Local people, whether they be interested in Bowls or not, or how a public park with public amenities is being turned into a commercialised profit centre at the expense of basic amenities affordable and accessible for all ought to be asking their elected representatives to ask questions.Bowls is a multicultural genteel sport played all over the world. It is reviving and can be played from a young age right through to old age. Not many Sports than can accommodate that.When it's gone it's gone. A proper sports facility, a public amenity replaced by a Fast food outlet and a sideshow crazy golf. That's not a sport or a public amenity. It is a profit business.Did this not happen with Walpole Park and a Coffee Hut? That was another case of bullying and closed door dealing. And it went wrong. Very Wrong.Especially now that we are being told by authorities to walk, cycle and stay local.

Raymond Havelock ● 1724d8 Comments ● 1721d

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

This is a post from today (Monday 8 February) put on the Facebook page, Look After My Bills Problem Reporting Page by B**** Orm***"After initially being attracted by the promise of finding consumers the best market deal and starting the registration process, I read some worrying reviews and immediately cancelled - told LAMB that I had changed my mind and did not want them to look after my bills. Subsequently I continued to receive emails saying I had been transferred, causing me grief and frustration. I again informed them that I did not want LAMB to look after my bills and also emailed my current supplier to tell them I did not want LAMB to transfer me and that I wished to remain with Coop Energy. LAMB continued to email me about my transfer. What a nightmare! Fortunately Coop Energy stepped in on my behalf. This was quite some time ago and I continued to receive email from them but I have blocked them. Neil I wish you luck. Once they get their claws in you they fill your life with worry and anxiety. Relentless!"                                                                                                                                                                     For some reason, Money Saving Expert Martin Lewis on Saturday 6 February urged energy users to use switching companies such as Look After My Bills to try to get cheaper energy.                               All I can say is, before you consider doing this look at the Facebook groups page Look after My Bills Problem Reporting Page and Trustpilot, Look After My Bills reviews before making a decision you may regret for months to come.

Neil Milkins ● 1731d2 Comments ● 1730d

More ANPR cameras to be installed LTN 30 is a problem

Thank you Ealingtoday for reporting this. I am not a road traffic professional but I worked in the safety industry and carried a Home Office warrant for some time and took courses at university in the psychology of perception. I've held a clean licence for 55years.I would strongly recommend the council review this ANPR camera at least before rushing to put in more. 1)There are 4 routes to the barrier in Culmington Road yet only one speed camera warning sign. That one is positioned after the camera at the barrier. In normal life warnings are given BEFORE the danger i.e. before the camera that allows the message to sink-in and appropriate action be taken.  The camera sign is often linked to speed cameras and many motorists probably check their speedometer when they see one; a dangerous detraction. 2)There are warning signs "No access to Culmington Road ahead except cycles". For strangers that means nothing. One sign is even sited IN Culmington Road. Strangers won't know what it means and even the Council have made 3 road name mistakes in public notices. These are "unique signs" and have to be interpreted by the motorist. Standard signs showing road closed ahead would have been cheaper and carried more information at a glance. Motorists absorb standard signs without thinking; subliminally. There should have been standard signs on each of the 4 limbs approaching this junction. To be continued

Arthur Breens ● 1756d36 Comments ● 1735d

Ealing's reliance on parking fine income betrays Labour party principles

Probably not a surprise that Ealing is one of the highest issuer of parking fines in the country according to a report on currently on this site. Judging by a ticket place on a car parked near my home, enforcement continues unabated despite the supposed lockdown.It is no longer worth pretending these fines don't act as a local tax with the revenue being used to cover the shortfall in Council Tax and government grant funding.PCNs are not adjusted for income so you get the same for parking in the wrong place at the wrong time if you have a Fiat Uno or a Ferrari. It will be argued that as the very poorest in society don't tend to own cars then as a tax this is a reasonably point. However, people who need to use cars for their work will tend to be on below or around average income with a large proportion of fines going to those in the building trade, carers, minicab or delivery drivers.Better off drivers probably make up the bulk of people who successfully appear these fines.Some will say that it is a voluntary tax and if you can't afford to pay it obey the rules. Our family have received two parking fines over the last decade in Ealing - in both cases we had thought we had parked correctly in areas we were familiar with but the signs were misleading. Appeals were dismissed out of hand and no attempt was made to improve the signage. Very few people parking in Ealing will do so on the basis they hope to get away with it because by now most are aware how intensive enforcement is so most fines are issued to people who have made a genuine mistake.This effectively means that the parking fines operate as a highly regressive tax something that is directly opposed to the founding principles of the Labour party. Yet it seems to be Labour authorities, like Ealing that use this most as a method of raising finance. I appreciate that this is a challenging time for council finances but the over dependence of this borough on this form of income is not healthy or fair on residents.

Mark Evans ● 1750d8 Comments ● 1742d

FUNERAL ARRANGEMENTS.

FUNERAL ARRANGEMENTS.For some people it is not bearable to think about, or to plan for their own funeral or for that of their spouse. However in these uncertain times I believe it is a responsible thing to do to take some of the pressure and grief off family members by not leaving things to late. Myself and my wife have taken steps to leave very little for our family members to worry about regarding these arrangementsWe have taken steps to arrange Pure Cremation funerals which was catapulted into the news a few years ago by singer David Bowie. For instance, if I die first, my wife will contact a funeral director in Hampshire. They will take care of all the arrangements needed. I would be collected from my home or from anywhere else and taken to Hampshire to to the funeral director's own private crematorium for disposal. No flowers, no family present and no funeral service. Arrangements have already been made for a memorial service shortly after my death.The benefits of doing things this way is that the cost to my wife and family is minimal. If I die at home the cost of the complete funeral arrangement is £1195.00 or £1.445 if I die in hospital or nursing home. The average cost of a cremation funeral in the UK is £3,986, sometimes thousands more.Being a very competitive business I am sure that some funeral directors would charge less than £1195.00.Nobody wants to die, but time and unforeseen events befall us all. In the mean time wash your hands and socially distance.

Neil Milkins ● 1744d0 Comments ● 1744d

Government says public should have right to ask councils to release land for redevelopment.

The government has published for consultation proposals that would enable the public to challenge councils and other public bodies to release underused land for redevelopment.The ‘right to regenerate’ proposals mean that underused public land could be sold to individuals or communities by default – unless there is a “compelling reason” for the owner to keep itPublic bodies would need to demonstrate clear plans for the land in the near future – even if it is a temporary use before later development. If it were kept for long without being used, it would have to be sold.The rights would also apply to unused publicly owned social housing and garages. The government notes that the latest figures show there were more than 25,000 vacant council-owned homes and recent Freedom of Information data shows there were more 100,000 empty council-owned garages last year.The government says it wishes to provide local communities with an opportunity to “transform eyesores” into something they want in their area. It builds on government work to encourage development on brownfield land.Jenrick said: “Right to regenerate is the simple way to turn public land into public good, with land sold by default unless there is a very compelling reason not to do so.“We are cutting through red tape so that communities can make better use of available land and derelict buildings, which means more new homes, businesses and community assets.“Millions of people will now be able to buy that empty property, unused garage or parcel of land and turn it into something good for them and their community.”Tom Chance, chief executive of the National Community Land Trust Network, welcomed the idea.“There are hundreds of community land trusts across the country wanting to build much-needed affordable housing, but getting hold of land at an affordable price is a huge barrier.“The potential for communities to be given first right of refusal could be a game changer. We encourage everyone to read through the proposals and respond to the consultation.”Ian Harvey, executive director of Civic Voice, added: “Across the country, communities see land that remains empty and wonder why. They imagine how it could be used for communities – from green space, to housing – but when they enquire about enhancing the space it’s never clear who owns it.“If a community has a viable use for this land, they must be given the opportunity to take these ideas forward.“The ‘right to regenerate’ is a great step forward to build on previous attempts at doing this and we believe it will increase the chance for communities to come together to bring vacant land into the heart of the community. We look forward to working with communities on this latest community right.”The consultation, which closes on 13 March, can be found here on the UK Government website.18 January 2021Laura Edgar, The Plannerhttps://www.planningportal.co.uk/news/article/750/planning_news_-_21_january_2021?utm_source=PPQ+Newsletter&utm_campaign=efc81fca0a-Newsletter_11072019_HTML_COPY_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_734e0b63a9-efc81fca0a-7282665#two

Rosco White ● 1749d0 Comments ● 1749d

Look After My Bills Nightmare.

To save people the agony of having to deal with a future nightmare  with Look After My Bills and Utility Point please read their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.                                  This is an email I received from Trustpilot this week.                                                People are reading your review!Hi Neil Milkins,You recently wrote a review on Trustpilot and it looks like people find it helpful.117 people have already read your review.                                                                                                       LOOK AFTER MY BILLS SHAMBLES.It is now 12 weeks since Look After My Bills without my knowledge or permission changed my energy provider from S.S.E. to Utility Point. Jacqueline Loughman promised me 9 weeks ago that they would resolve the matter within 14 days. A week ago their senior complaints manager Daniel promised me he would phone me on (29-12-20) and have the matter resolved. No phone call and no answer to my emails to him. In the meantime I am going to have a sky high electric and gas bill when this matter is resolved. It is near impossible to get a reply from them once you have emailed and phoned them and it is totally impossible to phone Utility Point as ALL their phone lines have been cut off. I have been on the phone and emailing 19 hours in total trying to sort this mess out. Anyone thinking of going with Look After My Bills or Utility Point please check their horrendous reviews on Trustpilot.

Neil Milkins ● 1768d14 Comments ● 1757d

Renaming Havelock Road Council corruption

Renaming Havelock Road may be a trivial issue. The way it was achieved is an illustration of how Ealing Council at its highest level goes about its business: dishonestly. The decision to rename the road Havelock Road was made by “two pillars of the community”, Julian Bell, Council Leader, and Paul Najserak, CEO.   Bell suggested the idea (10.6.20.)  Why?  He doesn’t live on the road or in Southall.   ANSWER:  he depends on Southall councillors for support and is in the pay of the local MP.    Self-interest. On 14.7.20 the matter appeared on the agenda of the Cabinet, never having been discussed by them before.  The Cabinet had it all done and dusted there and then.   They decided a council officer could make the decision. Democracy?  No. Decisions should be made by our elected representatives, not by council employees.  Paul Najserak made the decision.  Between Bell making the suggestion and Najserak making the decision what occurred appears to be a conspiracy to subvert due process so that Southall could be given what Southall wanted -  FREE.FREEDOM OF INFORMATION REQUEST I have been trying to get straight answers about what occurred for weeks.  I am still trying. A Freedom of information Request is needed to secure the minutes of meetings and internal memoranda. I believe someone has already made one.  If that person is reading this, would they please let us know the result - if there was one.Meanwhile: LETTER SENT TO BELL “Dear Julian Bell, Why did the Cabinet deal with renaming Havelock Road rather than leaving it to a resident to make an application?   There was no reason a resident could not do so and it is the routine way for such applications to happen?  Your sincerely, Andrew Farmer”

Andrew Farmer ● 1793d10 Comments ● 1760d

Ealing Planning! Object extension of further storey in the modern house in quiet Oxford Road

IMPORTANT!Dear Neighbours, it's Yulia from the Grove.As you may know, the modern house on 69 Oxford Rd has submitted a planning application to Ealing Council to build a further storey on top of their existing building, despite the original planning application being for a single storey onlyThe application is very professional and has gone through pre-consultation with the Council. So it will be hard to stop. The Plannint Case Officer (Smruti Patel) has confirmed that the number of objections will make a big difference to the case for blocking planning permission. So far only 10 objections have been received - we ideally need 50-60Possible grounds for objection:- overdevelopment - out of character with surrounding conservation area - potential for reduced parking- reduced light for gardens close to the property- sets a precedent for other modern developments in the conservation arePLEASE SUBMIT AN OBJECTION - it only takes 2 mins to write 1-2 lines in your own words referring to the grounds of objection abovehttps://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/applicationDetails.do?activeTab=makeComment&keyVal=QHS9ZZJMFX500The link above is where you submit your objection. You need to fill in your personal details. Select 'neighbour' for 'commenter type', select 'object' for 'stance' and then tick the following boxes under 'reason for comment': close to adjoining properties // development too high // inadequate parking provision

Yulia Chaplina ● 1800d6 Comments ● 1784d

A moste interestinge article with which I (of course!) heartily agree:-

However, we do live, currently, and despite the concerted efforts of many, in a free speaking society, and this is a Forum, so all opinions and comments are welcome to debate!https://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-9057393/CALVIN-ROBINSON-Good-riddance-bunkum-unconscious-race-bias-classes.htmlDaily Mail / Calvin RobinsonPUBLISHED: 23:19, 15 December 2020 | UPDATED: 23:21, 15 December 2020As diversity lessons for the civil service are scrapped, it's good riddance to the bunkum of 'unconscious race-bias' classes.Despite huge demographic changes in recent decades, our political system has not been scarred by extremism, nor has our society been gripped by racial discord.Britain is a remarkably tolerant country with an impressive record on integration.Despite huge demographic changes in recent decades, our political system has not been scarred by extremism, nor has our society been gripped by racial discord.Our national spirit of openness is precisely why so many migrants wish to settle here.It is therefore a bitter paradox that this success story is being undermined by a small minority who pose as the champions of anti-racism but who only promote friction as they seek to paint Britain as a land wracked by bigotry.The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’.TwistedBut today’s self-styled ‘anti-racists’ have turned that ideal on its head, holding that we should all be defined by our ethnicity. In their twisted narrative, colour blindness is not a virtue but a vice.This divisive outlook is reflected in the fashion for ‘unconscious bias training’, now common in British workplaces, especially in the public sector.Such training — which can range from lectures to online tests — aims to root out any hidden prejudices that may inadvertently influence staff behaviour or decisions.That may sound like politically correct nonsense. But, in recent years, even our political class has succumbed to it.Since 2014, when completing four ‘modules’ in diversity and inclusion training became a requirement for all Whitehall staff, 170,000 civil servants have undergone it.And in the summer, at the height of the Black Lives Matter protests, Sir Keir Starmer decided all Labour Party employees should undergo such instruction.But now a welcome stand has been made by the Government against this fad.Yesterday, the Cabinet Office announced that ‘unconscious- bias training’ will be scrapped for the civil service, after an internal review found the courses did nothing for equality and, in some cases, were even counter-productive as they fuelled resentment.In the present institutionalised fervour about race, the decision is a bold one.But it is absolutely correct. For the review is only the latest in a string of reports that confirm that bias training is, put simply, a load of bunkum.In 2018, the Equality and Human Rights Commission found the evidence for the ‘ability [of unconscious bias training] to change behaviour is limited’.A year later, the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development declared that the courses in bias ‘had no sustained impact on behaviour’.This is hardly surprising given that the whole method is profoundly flawed and riddled with contradictions.It supposedly celebrates diversity, but demands rigid conformity with its dogma. Its ostensible purpose is to build harmony, but its bullying, hectoring tone causes hostility and defensiveness.Stereotypes are denounced under the doctrine, yet sweeping generalisations are made about white people. It preaches responsibility for personal actions, yet infantilises and patronises users.This was highlighted by a recent such course in Parliament, where MPs were lectured by a diversity consultant using a glove puppet.More importantly, it has no intellectual basis of any substance.Calvin Robinson: The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’ +3Calvin Robinson: The great American civil rights leader Dr Martin Luther King urged that, in the fight for equality, people should ‘not be judged by the colour of their skin, but by the content of their character’First developed in the 1990s from the Implicit Association Test, a tool for ‘psychological diagnosis’ developed by American social psychologists, it is a hopelessly unreliable pseudo-science, like astrology or phrenology (the belief that character can be assessed from the shape of the head).That lack of credibility stems from the fact that its primary purpose is not scientific at all, but political: namely, to be used by cultural warriors to ensure that everyone conforms to their world view.Queen Elizabeth I famously declared that she had ‘no desire to make windows into men’s souls’. For her, as long as her subjects obeyed the law, she did not care what they thought privately.That has been the British tradition for centuries.But bias trainers have a very different approach.Like the Thought Police of George Orwell’s novel 1984, they want to control minds by delving into the unconscious, where they would like to eradicate unpalatable ideas and impose compliance.And as with any attempt to change people’s thinking, the premise behind unconscious-bias training only operates in one direction, where white people are the eternal oppressors and ethnic minorities the permanent victims.It is inconceivable that on any course a black or Asian client would be berated by a trainer for showing prejudice against a white colleague.This one-sided attitude also gives rise to the racially charged concept of ‘white privilege’, which is not only nasty but absurd.A white supermarket shelf stacker has far less wealth and power than a successful black barrister or an Asian medical consultant.GuiltBut the bias trainers set a trap for anyone who dares to challenge them.They refer to ‘white fragility’ to describe any negative reaction to any accusations of racial prejudice.Surprise, surprise — their white clients can never win.If they submit, they are admitting to their guilt as unconscious racists. If they refuse, they are attacked for being in denial, too ‘fragile’ to handle the truth.Either way, the bias trainers — who charge a minimum of £300-an-hour for the opportunity to hector their customers — end up laughing all the way to the bank.One consultancy I came across yesterday charges a £1,750 fee for a day’s course in ‘unconscious bias and cross-cultural training’. But this mix of indoctrination and cash-grabbing has to end.Pictured: Femi Otitoju with ‘UB’ puppet, that is said to be used in the 'unconscious bias' training given to MPs in a course designed by Challenge Consultancy +3Pictured: Femi Otitoju with ‘UB’ puppet, that is said to be used in the 'unconscious bias' training given to MPs in a course designed by Challenge ConsultancyThat is why the Government’s decision yesterday was so welcome and could mark a turning point in the fight back against the spread of the pernicious woke agenda.The Tories have been in power for ten successive years and, after the last election triumph, enjoy an 80-seat majority in the Commons.Yet they have been astonishingly timid about defending liberalism and British values against the race-obsessed minority who have held sway for far too long.While, of course, there remain inequalities that need addressing, this cause has come to predominate in civic life.Museums are browbeaten into removing statues, schools into ‘decolonising’ their lessons.The National Trust, which has entirely succumbed to the PC onslaught, recently drew up a list of shame, featuring historic properties that have links to British imperialism or the slave trade.LaughableSome of the grievances would be laughable were they not so offensive.Only last month, the late Poet Laureate Ted Hughes was denounced because one of his distant ancestors had a connection to slavery.Meanwhile, without any sense of irony at all, Prince Harry, a self-appointed high priest of the diversity cult, has the nerve to lecture us about white privilege.Even the much-cherished British pastime of horticulture is in the dock, with BBC Countryfile presenter James Wong declaring last week that ‘UK gardening culture has racism baked into its DNA’.Welcome to the mad world of contemporary ‘anti-racism’, where even pruning the roses may be a thought crime.The Government’s decision is a much-needed blow for sanity against such lunacy.Britain is a great country with so much that people of all races can celebrate.We cannot allow its appeal to be destroyed by fanatics bent on whipping up racial disunity for their own self-serving ends.Calvin Robinson is a former teacher and now governor at a London state school.

Rosco White ● 1785d0 Comments ● 1785d

No 15 Blakesley Avenue W5 - Planning enforcement

No 15 Blakesley Avenue has appealed to the Sec of State against the enforcement notice issued by Ealing Council. This is the property that has breached planning regs and built a single storey rear extension and an unauthorised enlargement of a basement extension. They are continuing to build and no doubt the plan is to use the property as self contained flats without permission. This is similar to no 59 Eaton Rise where the application was to convert a family home into 7 self contained flats. Don't let this one set the precedent for the others and whilst it may not be happening on your doorstep today, large family homes are being lost more and more to scrupulous property developers who think they have found a way to make money by overdeveloping into these spaces, with or without permission.If you can help preserve our conservation area please forward to neighbours and friends in the Ealing area and if they wish to comment on the appeal, please can you do so online at https://www.gov.uk/appeal-enforcement-notice/comment-on-an-appeal or you can email your comments to teame1@planninginspectorate.gov.uk or a letter can be sent to The Planning Inspectorate, Room 3/23A, Temple Quay House, 2 The Square, Bristol BS1 6PN. The appeal ref to quote is APP/A5270/C/20/3258722. LAST DATE TO RESPOND 5 JANUARY 2021.An application for planning has just been made by no 13 Blakesley Avenue (neighbours of the above and we suspect related parties) to convert a same double fronted home into 8 self contained flats. Again if you can please ask friends and family, neighbours to lodge their comments at https://pam.ealing.gov.uk/online-applications/PLAN/204232FULThanks for all your help neighbours! Please forward and share on all social media sites.

Rukhi Sohi ● 1798d2 Comments ● 1798d

How other boroughs do it better

The Future of the Great British Town Hall – everywhere but Ealing “There is no alternative but to talk to the representatives of the community who are actively going to participate in this [civic building] long after we as architectural practitioners have moved on to other things. The term I use? ‘Ruthlessly inclusive’” – Ivan Harbour, Senior Partner, Rogers Stirk Harbour + Partners Town Halls are architectural icons from an era of optimism and utopia, which aimed to give power back to local communities. Whilst the buildings still carry those founding principles, there is a perception that they have lost their connection to the community and many have fallen into disrepair.Local Authorities, but not Ealing, are increasingly finding inventive ways to reverse this decline by re-imagining town halls, re-establishing them as public assets, and often successfully placing them at the centre of local regeneration and industrial growth strategies.Ealing council have closed the local town halls in the borough leaving only Ealing. Ealing borough residents were not consulted about the future of the old Town Tall and had only a brief chance to view some boards in the Broadway Centre, the done deal for Perceval House. Unlike the boroughs in this webinar our Illustrious Leader and his cabal of nodding donkeys have no vision.  Senior council officers share responsibility, they are employed to adviseThis webinar shows what can be done. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YdMYHiW-Ev4&feature=emb_logo

Libby Kemp ● 1810d2 Comments ● 1805d

Something Fishy About The Brexit Negotiations

The PM is disappearing off into the attic room in 10 Downing Street just as the Brexit policy he has championed is reaching a crisis point. He is now insisting on a rigorous interpretation of the rules having been exposed to Covid-19 because he had previously been totally unbothered about adhering to them. Whether this is because he wanted sometime away from Princess Nut Nuts or was hoping to catch up with The Crown and Breaking Bad we won't find out until he publishes his memoirs but whatever the reason his competence has once again been proven sorely wanting. Bad as the pandemic is, there is good reason to believe that a no deal Brexit would have more dire consequences for this country in the longer term. By Spring we hopefully will have a vaccine but the deleterious consequences of having no proper trading agreement with our neighbours will last for decades. The two things that seem to be driving us to no deal are the UK's government insistence on state aid and the issue of fishing. I can't begin to understand why a Conservative government would deem state aid to be so important — what on earth would Mrs Thatcher think? It was her driving forward the single market that significantly reduced government support across Europe for ailing industries and made the EU much more internationally competitive. I originally thought fishing was more straightforward. Although it is a tiny industry, fair enough that this country should be able to control its own waters. However, I now learn that most fishermen or fisherpeople as we now apparently must call them, don't want to leave the EU. This is because it has started to become clear that although British trawlers will be able to catch more fish, there will be nobody to buy it. We eat a relatively small proportion of the fish caught in domestic waters and the EU bought a large amount. These exports would now be subject to tariffs. Worse still more people are employed in processing fish than there are catching them and when a non-British ship currently brings in a haul from British waters it will go to our fish processing plants which are the largest in Europe. These ships will no longer bring their catch onshore because they would then be subject to tariffs so they will be processed in facilities in the EU. Because the catch of British ships alone will not be sufficient to make up the difference, so some of the processing facilities will inevitably close leading to large scale job losses in the industry. Is there anybody who still supports Brexit who can explain to me why if, even if the only industry supposedly benefiting from all this is being harmed, why we are going down this road other than the man supposed to be at the wheel has bu**ered off just when he is needed.




Gordon Southwell ● 1814d5 Comments ● 1808d

The War for Johnson's Ear

For anyone who has had the misfortune to study Tudor court politics what is happening in Number 10 seems depressingly familiar. Weak and incapacitated leadership from the top is leading to factions vying for power. It hasn't been stated explicitly in any of the news reports I have seen on this so far but it is difficult not to conclude that the Biden election victory has set this all off. Channel 4 did some proper investigative journalism to show the extent to which former members of the very small Vote Leave team now dominate at the Cabinet Office and Number 10.  This country has already had its reputation sullied by the current government but appointing someone who is best known for dressing up as a chicken as Chief of Staff would clearly have been a step too far. Channel 4 highlighted how the current cabinet has effectively been rendered powerless by the Cummings cliques grip on power so it has been left to the only apparent adult left in the room, Carrie Symonds, to act. The only possible argument for a no deal Brexit was that it would allow a transformative deal with the US which would partially compensate for the economic damage done. Biden may have called Johnson before other European leaders but it wasn't a sign of favour but to issue a warning about the Internal Market Bill and the Good Friday Agreement. Johnson has been told that if he continues on this path he will be very much on his on and it will be no deal with the US as well as with Europe which would be an economic disaster several levels up from what would have happened if we left without a deal under Trump. Today it looks alarmingly like a hostage situation is developing in Downing Street with Cummings and David Frost threatening to resign if Johnson doesn't stick to their programme. He may be tempted to give into their demands because a u-turn now would mean he would have to go back on all the pledges he made  after being elected.  However, there is some cause for optimism because it is hard to thing of a pledge that Johnson hasn't gone back on and there are signs that even a cabinet handpicked for their loyalty to Brexit are increasingly realising the current path is the one to national ruination. That said, if Cummings isn't out by the end of today I think it will be a very bad sign.

Gordon Southwell ● 1819d2 Comments ● 1815d

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads backed up.

Transport Secretary admits new cycle lanes are leaving roads 'backed up' with trafficGrant Shapps warns he is 'not prepared to tolerate' badly designed closures and cycle lanes, imposing 'sweeping changes' to communities. The Transport Secretary has admitted too many cycle lanes are being left “unused” with traffic “backed up” as a result of his green transport revolution, The Telegraph can reveal.In a strongly worded letter sent to councils, Grant Shapps has warned he is “not prepared to tolerate” badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes which are imposing “sweeping changes” to entire communities.And in a move that will infuriate cycling and green campaigners, he has declared the Government is not anti-car, explaining: “No one should be in doubt about our support for motorists.”Mr Shapps announced a £250 million Emergency Active Travel Fund in May intended to promote walking and cycling as the country emerged from lockdown. Councils were invited to apply for the cash by drawing up projects intended to entice people away from their cars and take more active forms of travel.However, critics have complained that badly designed road closures and new cycle lanes have in fact increased traffic and pollution on main roads, as well as reduced the number of people visiting high streets at a time when small businesses are desperate to recover from lockdown.Private residents have even launched legal action, claiming that because the schemes were introduced under emergency Covid powers, disability groups, local residents and businesses were not consulted, and consequently, normal local democratic procedures have been ignored.Meanwhile, so-called ‘Low Traffic Neighbourhoods’, where bollards and planters close off residential streets to traffic, have resulted in delays to 999 emergency response times as police, paramedics and fire crews encounter newly shut roads.The letter, sent on Friday to local authority transport bosses and local highways authorities and seen by The Telegraph, warns how a “notable number of councils used their funding poorly and were simply out of step with the needs of the local communities.”Mr Shapps continues: “I saw or heard from the public and parliamentary colleagues about far too many instances where temporary cycles lanes were unused due to their location and design, while their creation left motor traffic backed up alongside them; of wide pavements causing unnecessary congestion in town centres; and other issues that many have, rightly, reacted angrily to.”He explains how he had ordered his staff to “engage” with those councils where he had “concerns”, because badly thought out road closures and cycle lanes had been introduced.“Since then, numerous schemes have been scaled back and revised,” he wrote. “I am pleased with this, but the work will continue where local residents continue to have concerns.”He warns the second round of funding in the scheme could see some town halls receiving “considerably less” money if they fail to “embrace good design” or “consult their local communities”.He adds: “We all want to see the benefits that active travel brings to be realised, but poorly implemented schemes will make no friends for the policy or more broadly for active travel…“The crucial test is, does it deliver for the community it serves, and has it been done with their consultation.“Schemes must balance the needs of cyclists and pedestrians with the needs of other road users, including motorists and local businesses.“Only authorities which have passed these key tests will receive the funding they have asked for.“I want to be absolutely clear: we are not prepared to tolerate hastily introduced schemes which will create sweeping changes to communities without consultation, and ones where the benefits to cycling and walking do not outweigh the dis-benefits for other road users.”With The letter comes after thousands of people have held demonstrations and signed petitions forcing some town hall bosses into a series of humiliating U-turns after they introduced schemes with little or no public consultation.Last week, the Telegraph revealed how some councils were making hundreds of thousands of pounds in fines from motorists driving on newly closed roads.Projects in some parts of London have proven so divisive that planters have been daubed with graffiti and bollards ripped from the concrete. In one West London borough, opposition has been so vehement that police have had to attend to support council workers as they installed planters and bollards to close roads.So far, a total of £42,102,454 has been secured by 111 councils in England, including many London boroughs where opposition has been most vocal.https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics/2020/10/17/transport-secretary-admits-new-cycle-lanes-leaving-roads-backed/

Bernard Allen ● 1843d19 Comments ● 1819d

Black History Matters - Community Circle

Join us on Sunday 18th October at Ravenor Park at 10.30am as we hold a Safe Space to Share. This is a family-friendly Community Circle with a welcoming atmosphere and music. Meet your neighbours, exchange ideas and create social change. Creating a Open Community in Ealing to overcome racism together.Please Remember Distancing Guidelines.Supported By BLMWestLondonhttp://www.blmwestlondon.co.uk/https://www.instagram.com/blmwestlondon/https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuS23lZplfKqRZtXHMVTwEw/about?view_as=subscriberhttps://mobile.twitter.com/blmwestlondonInviting all individuals interested in overcoming racism locally to this safe space. We would love to hear from people who would love to offer their skills to the community. Come along, lets talk and introduce our beautiful selves to each other.Rough Schedule:10 am - 10.30 am : Meet and Greet - Introduction of Safe Space. @45 Ruislip Rd, Greenford UB6 9QD, Entrance to Ravenor Park from Ruislip Road.10.30 am : Opening Drumming, Chanting and Clapping Circle10.35 am: Open Mic - History10.55 am: Open Mic - Poetry11.30 am: Taking the Knee followed by Poetry and Yoga11.45 am: Open Mic - Black Business Shout Out12.15 pm: Open Mic - Community Circle12.45 pm: Well Being and Grounding12.55 pm Music Jam ( Bring your Instruments, Pots, Pans and wooden Sticks)1.15pm Anyone who would like to come and support All Black Lives UK March in the Central London. Marble Arch to Parliament Square 2pm-6pm Feel free to come with your spirit and energy to hear the speeches and raise the vibrations with your voices.https://www.instagram.com/allblacklivesuk/Aim-Bring the community together in a safe and healing space.Learn and share our History, Culture and Experiences with each other.Remembering the Traumas of the past and current. Healing with our SharingEmpower the Voices of Ealing and Wider Area. Coming up with local projects and ideas.A Litterpick if any rubbish is made of the area to ensure a clean and peaceful community action. Please bring a bag to put rubbish in.Let us know if you want to Help: Organise, Promote(social media), want help setting up Community Building like this in your local area.Looking for individuals connected to:Black BusinessesTherapistsYoga Instructors - Guided meditationsMusiciansPerformersPoetsIdeas on how to make it better for everyoneContact: blmwestlondon@protonmail.comIF YOU HAVE SYMPTOMS PLEASE DO NOT ATTEND

Anil Patel ● 1845d0 Comments ● 1845d

ANOTHER BOGUS "CONSULTATION": HAVELOCK ROAD S

ANOTHER BOGUS CONSULTATION: HAVELOCK ROADHow many of you knew that the Havelock Road consultation began on August the 10th?  I learnt about it only when it appeared on Ealing Today on 28.8.20.  If I had relied on the Acton website, I would not know about it at all. Anyone who has taken part in one of these “consultations” knows they are hypocritical exercises to give an appearance of democracy to decisions already made.   We have a tick-the-box opportunity to express our opinion.  There is no possibility of dialogue in these consultations, of having one’s arguments responded to.  And who will assess the results?   Julian Bell will, along with senior council officers, who naturally will not wish to offend the great man, their boss. They will “summarise” the results, which allows them to put their spin on them.  These “summaries” are also where unique or substantial contributions can be lost to avoid having to deal with them.    As to the present matter, Bell was already in favour of changing the name the minute he received his “instructions” from Mayor Khan in early June.  Well, he would be wouldn’t he: he is kept in power by Southall votes.  The move was “welcomed” by MP Virendra Sharma, Mr Bell’s former/present (?) employer, who is evidently unaware of the custom of MPs’ keeping their nose out of local politics.  I can find no evidence of a council meeting at which the proposal was discussed and adopted.  This should have happened and information about it should have headed any proposal for consultation. This is this local government by dictat.  The proposition is put in positive terms.   It is to celebrate the birth of Guru Nanak, the founder of Sikhism.  A new tradition?   Can someone direct me to Abraham Road, Jesus Road, or Ron Hubbard Road?   The enterprise has of course the negative purpose of getting rid of the name “Havelock” (at least on the designated stretch of the road).   It is part of a cultural replacement agenda.  No case is made for expunging “Havelock”.  It should be.We shall no doubt have to pay for the work in changing the signage, but residents of the road will not be compensated for the changes they will have to make to documentation etc.. That is unjust. The blurb gives an account of the history and ethos of Sikhism, including its treatment of women, but fails to mention a matter that brings Sikhism into the news:  honour killings.  Such events are rare in the UK and “honour killing” is not a feature of the religion’s ideology, indeed it is contrary to it.  It is a cultural not religious matter.   However, if attitudes to women are what is being discussed, it should be mentioned if only to deal with it and make the points I have just made. Sikhism is not a problem, certainly not in Ealing.  Julian Bell is our problem.  He is pursuing this matter to follow instructions  from Khan, out of self-interest (votes) and with the approval of one of his “cash points”, Sharma.  

Andrew Farmer ● 1889d3 Comments ● 1885d

Gunnserbury Park Bowling Club

Some readers may have read the very sad and alarming news that the bowling green at Gunnersbury Park is to be "repurposed" as a putting green (also known as a crazy golf course).Much has changed since the incorporation of the Community Interest Company (CIC) in 2015. In that year, as part of a leisure strategy for the Park, it was stated that "the location of the bowls club and its green is seen as a positive to the scheme in terms of development of the club, membership and participation. For example use of the sports hall for indoor short matt bowls and general increase in footfall to the site. The councils have met with the bowls club committee and will continue to work together in developing these proposals."There is no question that the CIC faces formidable financial challenges, greatly exacerbated by the Covid crisis and by the fire at the cafe. However other significant problems, including the one year delay in the completion of the Sports Hub, appear to be due to poor project management rather than to bad luck.The CIC is a not-for-profit community interest company set up to manage Gunnersbury Park and Museum. The CIC is managed by a board of 6 people, supported by an executive arm comprising the CEO and other salaried staff. Amongst other things a CIC is statutorily responsible for ensuring that the company is run in a way that satisfies the community interest test. In practice, this means that it may be required to give more weight to the interests of the community than to financial returns although, like any other company, it is required to remain solvent.A matter of very significant public concern is the "democratic deficit" which characterises the CIC's activities. This is manifested in a lack of transparency, accountabilty, and reluctance to engage with the community. For example, the CIC publishes no lists of meeting dates, agendas, minutes, or agreed action points.This latest announcement by the CIC presages the wanton destruction of a precious community facility which was founded in 1931 and which could still be reinstated. It is clear that the CIC is bent on the cynical engineering of a situation whereby they hope that a planning permission for a cafe/restaurant at the bowling club pavilion will be be granted in due course.Descriptions of events over recent years have been characterised by misunderstandings, blatant misinformation and, like any other sports club, some internal dissension. At the end of its life the Bowling Club had 25 members, of which 22 were active. The Club was fully aware of the need to grow its membership, of all ages. To this end, the CIC were approached and a strategy was presented to them. A 2-year plan, allowing for completion of the new Sports Hub building, then 1 year exposure to all the visitors to the Hub, and then 1 year of open days and free training and associated publicity. It was felt that as a result the membership could easily be raised to 60 or more particularly as there were positive signs of a revival in the sport.The CIC rejected the plan out of hand.The club was given notice to quit the site by 9 January 2020. The CIC had reneged on an agreed extension of the Licence to Occupy and thereby forced the departure of the bowls club.All of those involved in the CIC's decision should hang their heads in shame. Brentford Voice wishes to do all in its very limited power to rescue the situation. To that end we would welcome any comments, suggestions, and expressions of support.Please post your replies on this Forum or send an email to info@brentfordvoice.co.uk

Jim Storrar ● 1911d4 Comments ● 1908d

Left-wing indoctrination in schools?

Left-wing indoctrination in schools? The decolonising project Following an earlier thread in respect of this matter, I have submitted a list of questions to the council officer, Julie Lewis, who is responsible for the decolonising project.  As yet, it is not even clear what it comprises.  There is no official statement in respect of it.    The Black Lives Matter Movement, however, appears to be its spring-board and at the centre of its interest.  One of my questions was which manifestation of the movement Ealing Council was in step with.  The movement has recently taken a sinister “black-shirt”, paramilitary-style turn.  We shall have to be on the look-out for Julian Bell goose-stepping down the Uxbridge Road, not likely, but, if the price was right -----Here are the questions.   1. THE DECOLONISING PROJECTI learned about it only from an item on the Ealing Today website.  I tried to find an official statement about the project but failed to locate one.Does Ealing Council have an official statement about the project?  [Q1]If so, may I have a copy and will you publish it?  [Q2]2. THE EALING LEARNING PARTNERSHIPThis is an association of Council officers and head teachers. You are its director.   I hoped I might find further information here but I am denied access because “full access is only available to registered users” and user accounts are only available for Ealing maintained schools and academies staff and Ealing LA staff. Why are they not available to the people who are funding it? [Q3]Do you consider it appropriate for the Council or ELP to operate in this covert manner in respect of children’s education, avoiding scrutiny by the public?   [Q4]Will you give me access to all the information about this organisation that I am presently denied?   [Q5]If not, what is your reason for refusing?  There is no issue of confidentiality involved. [Q6]3. THOSE INVOLVED IN THE DECOLONISING PROJECTThis initiative was arranged “in a meeting between education union representatives and Ealing Council on Tuesday, June 30” and you “welcomed the steps from the unions”.    “A union rep at Twyford High School” was also involved.Will you please supply a list of the other organisations and pressure groups whom you have consulted?  [Q7] This is to reassure us that this is not merely a one-sided, left-wing inspired endeavour but one that takes into account a spectrum of political opinion in respect of matters educational, the present issue in particular.Why did you not consult the people of Ealing?  What is taught in our schools, how it is taught and who influences what is taught is a matter of concern to all the people of Ealing. [Q8]Are you a member of a union?  Which?  One would not normally ask this question, but, in the circumstances, it is necessary in order to establish that you are behaving with the impartiality required of you as a public servant and by the council’s code for employees.   [Q9]4. THE “PROBLEM”You allude to government data in which “black Caribbean students’ attainment was below the average for England in all subjects and at all key stages.”   This was your reason for selecting this issue to act upon.There is also ample evidence that white working-class boys are underachieving.   The problem was discussed in Parliament on 12.3.20.  Statistics were reeled off and the opening speaker concluded by saying: I am concerned that this issue has been brushed under the carpet … by modern society, which refuses to see the plight of young white males, even those from disadvantaged backgrounds.Why are you concerned with one racial group and not another?   The two matters could surely be pursued in parallel, instructively so. There is no evidence of any similar endeavour in respect of white working-class boys. Your present approach, if not racist, is manifestly RACIALLY-DISCRIMINATORY.   What is your explanation?   The reason you give for pursuing the one matter applies equally to the other. [Q10]5. THE PROBLEM LOCALLYYou are concerned that black Caribbean students’ attainment is below the average in England.  What evidence do you have that this is the case in Ealing? [Q11]Which schools in Ealing are operating the curriculum to the disadvantage of black Caribbean pupils so that it is necessary to “decolonise” the curriculum in their case?   Please name them.  [Q12]If you have no such evidence, why burden schools with this issue at a time that is difficult enough for them as they prepare to reopen?  [Q13]Why are you acting upon generalised data and mere assumption?  [Q14]6.THE CURRICULUM  It is difficult to understand how the manner in which mathematics is taught at GCSE or A level can disadvantage black Caribbean-heritage pupils as, while socio-economic factors may affect their diligence, success in the subject essentially depends upon a capacity for abstract reasoning.  How does one decolonise a quadratic equation?  With other subjects, though not all, it might make more sense.Please supply a list of subjects with an explanation of what “decolonise” MEANS in the context of each. [Q15]The union representative, has some suggestions. LiteratureHe writes: “The English curriculum has a lot of dead white men in it, and yet whilst those suggestions are literally very good examples, there is a wealth of other authors and poets that can be studied that would be just as good, just as relevant, and perhaps more engaging for our population.”Which, in your opinion are the “dead white men”  - and let us not forget the ladies - whose works are no longer considered relevant?  Shakespeare, Wordsworth, Milton, Dickens, Austin, the Brontes?   And, more importantly, the names, please, of the “authors and poets who are just as good”.  [Q16]GeographyHe refers to progress being made by a rep who set up a WhatsApp group now with more than 100 geography teachers, academics and professors looking how to make the subject anti-racist.  More information, please. In what way is geography as presently taught in Ealing schools racist?   Which schools in Ealing are guilty of this racism? [Q17]HistoryYour union man asks: “Will Ealing and ELP work with the NEU in putting together a curriculum which has been decolonised and has got anti-racism threaded through all parts of the curriculum and not just having a Black History Month?”This sounds very much like what we were promised had Labour won the last election. Even the phraseology resembles Labour’s Race and Faith manifesto. (“The history of colonialism should be ‘part and parcel of what our children learn all year round’” and "not just in Black History Month".   A Trust was to be set up to ensure “the historical injustices of colonialism, and the role of the British Empire was properly integrated into the National Curriculum, to teach powerful Black history which is also British history”.)Which schools in Ealing have been failing to teach the “dark side” of the history of the British Empire?  Please name them. [Q18]Is it the opinion of Ealing Council that the British Empire had no good effects? [Q19]Will you explain how the Ealing Council will make sure that a balanced account of the British Empire will be presented in the classroom?   The indications are that it will not be. The very terms of discussion suggest the matter is already settled. [Q20]The analysis of the content of any part of the curriculum can only be plausibly carried out by a person qualified in that subject.  Please state in respect of each part of the curriculum, each subject, the name, status and qualifications of the person who will be examining that part of the curriculum in order to decolonise it. [Q21]7. TWYFORD HIGH SCHOOLTwyford School is singled out on the local website. It is an Academy.  There is no reason Ealing Council should not have discussions with academies along with its own schools, but an academy is free within the law to determine its own curriculum.  What business is it of Ealing Council, to seek to pressure schools into going along with your decolonising agenda?   I say “pressure” because head teachers may well feel intimidated into going along with it for fear of being called racist, which is the bullying ploy of left-wing agitators. Twyford High School was not put in the spotlight by a communication from the school but by a “union rep” at the school.  The latter “revealed” that a letter has been received from 700 current and former pupils urging the school to “decolonise” the curriculum and support Black Lives Matter.  A working group is being set up at the school for September. The suspicion is that the union rep might have been behind organising the letter and be behind setting up the working group. Who is the “union rep”?  His name, please.  To whom did the rep “reveal” this?   To you or some other officer of Ealing Council?  Or to whom? [Q22]The union “rep” appears to be distracting pupils from their education at a time when concentration upon it is particularly difficult and attempting to set up a posse of left-wing BLM activists?  Irrespective of his obligations as a teacher, it is difficult to see how this activity conforms to the proper purpose of a students’ union as defined in legislation.Is it Ealing Council’s opinion that the proper purpose of a students’ union is to facilitate politically-motivated activism as against allowing it to have input into the “domestic”, day-to-day affairs of the school? [Q23}Twyford School has an excellent report from Ofsted.   It did particularly well in respect of black pupils.“A well-above-average proportion of pupils are from minority ethnic backgrounds, mainly Black or Black British, mixed race, Asian or Asian British, and White other than British   ---  Pupils of all backgrounds and abilities make excellent progress in tir studies and achieve well in almost all their lessons  --- The gap is also narrowing significantly between the performance of certain minority ethnic groups, such as Black African and Caribbean pupils, and their peers at Twyford. They have done well in the past compared with national averages for their heritage group, and are now catching up with national norms for all pupils …. Exclusions of Black Caribbean boys has been higher than for other groups in the past but a specific focus on these pupils’ needs, responding with an effective curriculum, has reduced the number of incidents.In the light of this, what reason is there to interfere with the curriculum in this school? [Q24]8. BLACK LIVES MATTERYour project is floated on the tide of enthusiasm for the “Black Lives Matter” movement.  Indeed, your ELP “provides information and guidance relating to Black Lives Matter and anti-racism, and presentations addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matters protests”. This was a statement made with “partners in Hackney and Brent on changing what youngsters learn in schools”.In any case, we are clearly not talking about BLM as a slogan or sentiment (about which there is no dispute) but as an organisationWhat advice have you given and are you giving in respect of presentations “addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matters protests”?  Please may I have a copy? [Q25]What guidance are you as a council officer or director of ELP giving to schools in respect of the BLM movement?  Please may I have a copy? Which “Black Lives Matter” organisation is Ealing Council supporting?  Please respond in respect of each of the following. [Q26](i) Is it the original organisation formed by three black feminist lesbians?(ii) Is it the present USA organisation with its Defund the Police agenda and at the moment devoted to the political purpose of influencing the USA election? (iii) Is it an English version?   If so, details of that, please. (iv) Is it the recent “Black Trans Lives Matter” variant?  (v) Is it the Black Lives Matter movement in its Marxist manifestation in which the black/white polarity is interpreted as the oppressed/oppressor scenario of the “long march”?  This was voiced recently in Oxford by an activist.   “Racism is based on Capitalism”, she began.  She continued, “We need a black militia.   They have pepper sprays.  We have a pepper spray.  The police is no different from the KKK.   British values do not exist.  Put you fist in the air. BLACK POWER!  Don’t let a Jewish man make you unheard.   Free Palestine!” Does Ealing Council endorse these views? If not, reject each one specifically and in turn. Failure to do so will indicate that Ealing Council is in agreement with these sentiments and aims.(vi) Is it the BLM we have seen in action, rioting in Central London and injuring members of the police force, attacking and abusing black officers, committing acts of criminal damage in Bristol, rioting again in Brixton, whose members interviewed on TV have stated that its aim is to destroy capitalism?Will you dissociate yourself unequivocally and in specific terms from the manifestations of the BLM movement I have described?   If you do not, I shall assume you approve of them and are approaching your work in a politically-motivated manner and that their views are your politics. [Q27]9. POLITICS IN EDUCATIONThe BLM movement, however it manifests itself, is a political movement. Council officers are allowed to reflect council policy, for instance the Borough Plan in considering planning applications.  In respect of education and politics they are not, nor should they seek to influence schools and teachers in respect of a particular political outlook, neither should a local authority, neither should schools.Schools have a legal duty to teach children about politics in a balanced way.  The Education Act 1996, Part V. Ch IV at 406 1 (b) prohibits “the promotion of partisan political views in the teaching of any subject in the school” and at 407 requires that (1) the local education authority, governing body and head teacher shall take such steps … that where political issues are brought to the attention of pupils (b) they are offered a balanced presentation of opposing views.“There is no reason why a teacher should not discuss the BLM Movement, but it should be done in an objective, non-partisan manner.  That is not what is proposed here. Here, we have a union-led endeavour supported by Labour MPs, with a left-wing doctrinaire agenda, evident in, for instance, the “corbynated” attitude to the British Empire and your adding “BLM” to the ELP’s list of committees as though it were one of its functions. Will you explain how your present activity conforms to your obligations under the Act? [Q28]Within in each section I have numbered the questions and requests in square brackets so that you can keep a tally of them.  Please answer them by number, rather than by generalised, catch-all comments. 

Andrew Farmer ● 1911d5 Comments ● 1909d

Major Squeeze on Parking Spaces in the Borough

It is disappointing not to have had the opportunity to have commented on the plan to convert lots of parking spaces in the borough to electronic car charing stations. I'm not against it in principle as it is clearly necessary that if there are more electric cars they will need more places to charge them. However, more consideration needs to be given to the implications of the sharp reduction in the number of parking spaces in the borough.We would all, I would hope, by now have reduced the amount we use our cars by and cut out unnecessary short journeys. However, it is only a small proportion of families that can dispense with a car altogether and the rest of us need somewhere to park them.The LTNs planned across the borough all seem to be taking out quite a few parking spaces.All those new flats being built, while notionally car free, will inevitably cause more pressure on available parking space. We all know the dodges used by people - dubious blue badge claims, business permits etc. to be able to park.Once the number of parking spaces falls below the number of cars needing to park in the area then you will see an increase in traffic in residential areas as people circle round looking for space. Combined with LTN restrictions this could mean some roads that were previously quiet will have a constant stream of traffic.If you think it is worth the price consider the position of a woman who works irregular hours and needs a car for her work coming home at night and not being able to park particularly close to her home.

Tricia Arbuthnot ● 1924d20 Comments ● 1912d

Decolonising the curriculum?!

We learn from Ealing Today that the borough is involved in a drive to ‘decolonize the curriculum and to replace it with anti-racist learning’. Are teachers surprised to be told that their current teaching has been ‘racist’? What is going on in Ealing? Who is messing with the curriculum in our secondary schools and on what authority?  The school curriculum is established in law. It’s intended beneficiaries are pupils and parents.   If change to the curriculum is envisaged, these are the “stakeholders” who need first to be considered and who should lead the conversation, not the Ealing Learning Partnership, a quango condescending from above.  And not unions.   One wonders how loudly the voices of parents and pupils are heard in the ELP, directly even, rather than mediated by headteachers.  What does the ELP do?  Six committees have been established.  How often do they meet?  Are minutes kept?  Unfortunately, if I want to read more, “full access is only available to registered users from schools and settings that subscribe to the Ealing Learning Partnership” and user accounts are currently only available for Ealing maintained schools and academies staff and Ealing LA staff.  Why Ealing LA staff?   Why not parents and pupils?  Why not concerned council-tax payers who are funding the enterprise?  The idea that the ELP can operate in secrecy, without scrutiny by those most concerned, is outrageous.  If this organisation is publicly funded, its papers should be publicly available. The ELP also provides information and guidance relating to Black Lives Matter and anti-racism, and presentations addressing George Floyd’s murder and the Black Lives Matter protests.  It is produced by the Hackney Learning Trust and shared with Ealing in the spirit of collaboration, but of course not shared with Ealing Council council-tax payers.  Sadly, I can’t ask the date of the next demo and what to take along to throw at a policeman.  Is it a LA’s role to give advice about protests, particularly one with a politically motivated agenda and violent reputation?What, as council-tax payers are we getting for our money in funding the ELP?  The recent contribution of Ms Julie Lewis (Ealing’s director learning, standards and school partnerships) to Ealing Today suggests not much. She tells Ealing Today a ‘huge amount’ is being done to tackle the under achievement of Black Caribbean students in the borough and that the ‘learning outcome of this work is ……of much wider and greater significance.’ Ms Lewis had the opportunity to tell Ealing Today’s reporter something specific, but her comments amount to little more than amorphous guff. In this she is matched by the contribution from Stefan Simms, secretary of Ealing’s National Education Union. He is another master of vague superlatives, ‘immense amount of enthusiasm and willingness’. Is that really worth saying?    The whole of the ELP’s literature is couched in this embarrassing mission-statement drivel because of course it has A VISION.  Don’t they all!  Mr Simms goes further than Ms Lewis. He takes on the current curriculum in English in schools: ‘Michael Gove insisted that the English curriculum has a lot of dead white men in it’. Well, he didn’t actually. It was Mary Bousted, General Secretary of the National Education Union, thinking, no doubt, of Fevre and Bancroft’s Dead White Men and Other Important People (2010, 2016). She said, 'schools must look beyond dead white men to make the curriculum more diverse'.   Leaving that aside, Mr Simms goes on to say ‘there is a wealth of other authors and poets that can be studied that would be just as good, just as relevant, and perhaps more engaging for our population.’   The idea, in that last phrase, that literature can be better studied because it mirrors the consumer’s own culture and, thereby, becomes more engaging defeats the object of teaching which is to extend the pupil’s awareness from the familiar to the less familiar. Did it not cross Mr Simms’ mind that, if Shakespeare were not still relevant today, he would long ago have joined the ranks of the dead forgotten? I recently saw young children in a production of The Tempest in a London primary school, simplified and abbreviated and incorporating additional songs and dances but performed with huge vigour, enthusiasm and excitement by a cast of widely differing ethnicities. They also gave us Macbeth (another of that dead white man’s efforts) with several Macbeths and Lady Macbeths from a variety of races. A clever way of making long roles more manageable and the whole thing very enjoyable for actors and audience.  Mr Simms and those who think like him fail to appreciate just how alive those dead white men are for kids and would seek to deprive them of the opportunity of finding out. It is noticeable that pressure for change to the curriculum does not come from kids. It comes from adults who have their own agendas. Kids do not, to my knowledge, quarrel with the curriculum qua curriculum. They get on with doing The Hunger Games or whatever and get something out of it.Pupils’ under-achievement is a complex issue. A recent article by Jonny Brooks-Bartlett, a Black Caribbean graduate in Maths with a Ph D from Oxford, in the magazine Chalkdust never once mentions deficiencies/ biases in school curricula to explain Black Caribbean under-achievement. On balance, he suggests, under achievement stems from the narrow expectations of parents, encouraging children in subjects which they think will lead to good jobs, and, mistakenly, failing to encourage proficiency in other subjects which have equally good career prospects. I do not know if he is right. But, I think, on balance the socio-economic positioning of Black Caribbean children is far more likely to explain their underachievement than a school curriculum that needs to be decolonised.           

vincent paul wrigley ● 1938d11 Comments ● 1933d

The Perverse closure of Occupation Lane

Hounslow Council is claiming a victory in closing Occupation Lane.Only within hours some facts have come to light that expose the using of Covid as a front for Traffic schemes as a complete deception to residents.Today has seen motor cyclists using Occupation Lane as a race track and making a mockery of the concrete blocks which now prevent any sort of pursuit.This already dodgy to be after dark location which is according to CovidTraffic is "deemed a suitable place to walk and cycle will no doubtt be a new haven for drug dealing and low level crime.But worse still. This is the main route for access to Clayponds Hospital. This is where patients go for rehabilitation from operations and long term injuries and ailments.  Being a rather isolated location are the Covid Traffic experts answering why this has been made almost inaccessible?No because they have not even considered it. Older people are  to relevant to their policy idealsCertainly not infirm elderly, they are going to die of Covid anyway so lets forget them.Clearly the attitude of several Labour Councillors in both Ealing and Hounslow and several senior officers.They have overlooked that Occupation Lane was resurfaced sans Speed humps to allow smooth transit for patients being driven by ambulance or private vehicles, it took years for this to take place and constant requests from Ramp Ambulance drivers and other care drivers. Largely because the roads south of Clayponds have been notorious for 40 years plus with dreadful road surfaces and narrow pinch points.The roads have been resurfaced but speed humps remain that are not possible for ambulances to completely avoid and two full speed humps are in bad condition and cannot be avoided.The Lane was the original access road to the Hospital until part of the site was sold off and the hospital rebuilt but the access was moved.So now we have patients and local patients mainly of Ealing placed at risk when transported particularly after treatment and a racetrack and criminal activity site that will no doubt use up more of the Police budget.Just how incompetent are these experts? And why not a word from councillors who will have to take the rap for such myopic knee-jerk implementation of schemes? Early making best use of resources for the NHS or those who support patient care.

Raymond Havelock ● 1948d10 Comments ● 1938d

One can but hope that the new sports centre in Gunnersbury Park burns down too- Gunnersbury Feedback

Gunnersbury Park was established as a place of recreation for the people of Ealing not as a charitable/non-profit organisation for the paying of Sir Somebody-or-other's extortionate salary for running it. It is bounded by three council estates, what did the trustees directors or whoever think was going to happen when then tried to create an haute-cuisine dining experience that charged three times as much as the affordable -public service' (and much loved) cafe did? If they ever catch whoever torched this travesty of public trust that is the new restaurant I hope to contribute to their defence fund, they performed a public service. I can only hope that a similar 'act-of-God' strikes the new sports centre that is designed to provide revenue to fund the salaries of charity/non-profit liggers and not to provide value recreation to local, and often disadvantaged local residents. So much for the 'Gunnersbury Park Historic Buildings Survey ExtendedYour views on uses for small mansion and stables wanted' article on today's Ealing Today, there is plenty of feedback, albeit in the form of arson, it is just that nobody is listening. Endless input to local councillors who view it as more important (and put in more effort) to preserve the operation of their favourite late-night drug-dealing drinking joints than to preserve a useful and accessible public space and facility

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1957d7 Comments ● 1957d

Two metres/Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission

Let us hope Boris does not reduce the social distancing requirements to one metre or three feet in response to requests by pub, restaurant, bar and other hostility trade businesses when they re-open'Six feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts say' - CNNhttps://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-05-28-20-intl/index.html14 hr 47 min agoSix feet of distance may not be enough to prevent coronavirus transmission, experts sayFrom CNN’s Arman AzadPublic health officials have called on people to stay six feet apart to slow the spread of coronavirus through so-called respiratory droplets. But three experts are warning that six feet may not be enough – and they say the world needs to take airborne transmission of the virus seriously.In a commentary published in the journal Science, the experts called for “regular, widespread testing” to find asymptomatic cases, and they pointed to places where mask wearing is universal and the virus has been controlled, like Hong Kong and Taiwan. World Health Organization guidance might not be enough in all situations, they said.“Evidence suggests that (the novel coronavirus) is silently spreading in aerosols exhaled by highly contagious infected individuals with no symptoms,” wrote Chia Wang of National Sun Yat-sen University in Taiwan and Kimberly Prather and Dr. Robert Schooley of the University of California, San Diego.    “Increasing evidence for (the coronavirus) suggests the six foot WHO recommendation is likely not enough under many indoor conditions where aerosols can remain airborne for hours, accumulate over time, and follow air flows over distances further than six feet,” they wrote.The three experts, who are specialists in chemistry and infectious diseases, said aerosols from breathing and speaking “can accumulate, remain infectious in indoor air for hours, and be easily inhaled deep into the lungs.” That makes wearing masks all the more essential, they said, even when people are keeping their distance. More on this: The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has focused on so-called respiratory droplets produced when a person coughs or sneezes. The droplets don’t linger in the air for long, but the CDC says they “can land in the mouths or noses of people who are nearby or possibly be inhaled into the lungs.” Spread is more likely when people are in close contact with one another, or “within about 6 feet,” the CDC says. That’s because respiratory droplets are relatively large and fall to the ground – unlike aerosols, which are smaller and more likely to stay in the air longer.Despite the focus on droplets from US health officials and others, the experts said “a large proportion of the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) appears to be occurring through airborne transmission of aerosols produced by asymptomatic individuals during breathing and speaking.” While more research is needed, they called for robust testing schemes and said people need to mask up. “For society to resume, measures designed to reduce aerosol transmission must be implemented, including universal masking and regular, widespread testing to identify and isolate infected asymptomatic individuals,” they said.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 1986d15 Comments ● 1957d

Stop Press Shock Horror Probe Expose Revisionist UK Govment change truth to say face masks useful

Stop Press Shock Horror Probe Expose Revisionist Flat-Earther Post Truth Fake News UK Government to change truth to say face masks now useful against Covid-19 illnessThe Government is about to re-write the truth as it builds a stockpile of face masks for the public to use in shops and on public transport as it might  actually  help to control the spread of Coronavirus (now THAT is sarcasm Mr Trump) having told us that face masks are of no use for the public. Meanwhile, Nicola Sturgeon has told the Scots to wear masks. I wonder what chinless-wonder-inbred-Whitehall-SAGEMEMBER-public-school-Atheneum-Club-Member had to be 'put down' to get the fact that face mask might be useful past the flat-earth society?https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/apr/28/sturgeon-urges-scots-to-wear-coronavirus-face-masks-for-shopping-and-travelSturgeon says Scots should wear face masks for shopping and travelFirst minister issues new virus guidance but insists there is no ‘divide or split’ with UK adviceSturgeon says Scots should wear face masks for shopping and travelFirst minister issues new virus guidance but insists there is no ‘divide or split’ with UK advicehttps://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/britain-to-stockpile-masks-for-public-to-use-while-shopping-and-on-transport-b8d3vbm2d Britain to stockpile masks for public to use while shopping and on transport | News | The TimesBritain is to build a stockpile of face masks for people to wear while shopping and on public transport, it was announced, after Nicola Sturgeon pre-empted what is expected to be UK-wide guidance.Thewww.thetimes.co.ukBritain to stockpile masks for public to use while shopping and on transportBritain is to build a stockpile of face masks for people to wear while shopping and on public transport, it was announced, after Nicola Sturgeon pre-empted what is expected to be UK-wide guidance.The Scottish first minister confirmed that the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) had concluded that covering the face with a scarf or other cloth mask would probably help to slow the transmission of coronavirus in confined spaces as she recommended that people wore them “as a precautionary measure”.-

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2016d12 Comments ● 1970d

NAJSAREK and BELL

An open letter to Julian Bell.Dear Julian Bell,We have again had contact with Mr Najsarek and again have cause to doubt his integrity and suitability to occupy the post of CEO.  The question of how he managed to gain employment with Ealing Council will not go away. In February 2016, when he was appointed, you wrote: “I am delighted that we have been able to attract someone of Paul’s calibre to Ealing …Paul has an excellent record of achievement in local government”.: All we knew of his record in his previous appointment in Bolton was that he had been in his post there a short while.On June 30 2016, we learned from the national press, that, when he applied for his job here in Ealing, he had taken legal action to prevent his behaviour in his previous employment becoming known.  His “record of achievement” in Bolton was a front-page scandal: he was, it seemed from the reports, a financial liability and a man who could not be trusted to keep his word.  We had been sold or you had bought for us the CEO equivalent of a “dodgy motor”.  Ealing Council did not even see fit to comment on the disquieting disclosure. We cannot blame you for Mr Najsarek’s appointment if you were deceived as we were.  The question is: Were you? Did you already know anything of what appeared in the press on June 30 2016 in respect of Mr Najsarek’s behaviour in Bolton when you appointed him? “Yes” or “No” will do by way of a response.  Your sincerely,Andrew Farmer

Andrew Farmer ● 1976d16 Comments ● 1970d

Ealing's Lending to Thurrock - when will they ever learn?

I found the report on this site about Ealing council's loans to Thurrock both compelling and unsettling. However, there was a serious omission in the article in that no mention was made of Ealing's previous problems with loans made to Icelandic banks.Without that history it could be argued that it was perfectly reasonable for Ealing to lend to Thurrock because the risk was close to zero but that is exactly what was said when they joined in the rush to lend to a number of Icelandic banks that nobody had previously heard of. Just like Thurrock, Iceland ended up with an unsustainable debt burden. I think in the end Ealing got most of its capital back but it was still a grave error of judgement.Hammersmith & Fulham seem to have dodged this particular bullet but that is probably because they put in proper oversight when their officers lost huge sums gambling on index swaps.The management of councils' spare cash seems to be an area that is desperately short of regulation. Time and again some council officer with visions of being a master of the Universe in the City forgets that there is an unbreakable relationship between risk and reward. If someone is willing to pay you a higher rate for the money they borrow from you then there will always be a reason.Thurrock looks set to unwind in quite a messy way. No council is going to be willing to roll over loans and the point will come when won't be able to repay their creditors. I don't know where Ealing will be in the queue but the prospect of a very nasty loss is there at the very time when it is least needed. The hope would be that the government can sweep this under the carpet and cover any losses from Councils that lent to Thurrock but the worry is that there are many other councils at the same game and a systemic collapse of inter-council lending is on the cards. When that particular tide goes out we will find out who hasn't got any swimming trunks.

Gordon Southwell ● 1982d2 Comments ● 1980d

The Council's Corrupted Complaints Procedure

WE HAVE A PROBLEM Ealing Council’s corrupted complaints procedure.    The procedure is fine.  The senior officers who run it are not. I complained about a green rubbish collection.  It was sorted out immediately by a junior duty officer. However, when I and five neighbours complained about the conduct of senior officers, it was dealt with by senior officers. They failed to treat with us with honestly.The reason is obvious. Complaints against senior officers are dealt with by senior colleagues who in all likelihood know them and with whom they may have social or other relationships.   Though their obligation as public servants is to deal with complaints with IMPARTIALITY, they act as “counsel for the defence” for their friends, in contravention of the Council’s Code for Employees and the Seven Principles of Public Life.  They bring the Council into disrepute. A FORMULA FOR CORRUPTION has emerged.  To avoid investigating allegations against senior colleagues, officers (1) claim the matter has already been dealt with, (2) fail to produce evidence of that when asked to demonstrate it is other than a lie, and (3) attempt to terminate the procedure prematurely, denying complainants the right that Council policy affords them to request escalation.  In particularly disgraceful examples, (4) this has been accompanied by a threat to accuse the complainant of being a “persistent complainant” and deny them Council services if they continued to assert their right.  If this fails, they (5) falsely claim the complaint has run its course in the internal procedure so that they can foist their responsibility off onto the Local Government Ombudsman. The latest news: the Council’s senior legal officer colluded with a senior colleague about whom a complaint had been made and allowed her herself to decide whether the complaint against her should go ahead!  She decided to ignore it.   Well, she would, wouldn’t she!   Ealing’s senior legal officer seems unaware of the principle of natural justice that no one should be judge of their own cause (Nemo Judex in Causa Sua). We have been obliged to make complaints against a succession of seven officers as the lie (“already dealt with”) has been passed down the line.  “Tell one for the team” seems to be the esprit de corps in Ealing’s top offices. Our most serious concerns are with the officers who presently control the complaints procedure:  Ms Reynolds, Director of Customer and Transactional Services and so in charge of Ealing’s complaints procedure,  Ms Harris Director of Legal and Democratic Services and Mr Najserak, the CEO. What is needed is a PUBLIC enquiry by an independent agency into the behaviour of these officers in which they can be called to account and questioned by the complainants.   And that should be the arrangement whenever a complaint against a senior officer reaches stage three.   A system of that kind might enjoy confidence.  I have put this matter to every one of Ealing’s elected members.  They may at present be concerned with constituents’ problems, but I am hoping they may at an appropriate time in the future be able to respond.   The problem is not going to go away.

Andrew Farmer ● 1999d5 Comments ● 1997d

We are being lied to by Matt Hancock Secretary of State Health Social Care about the NHS Restoration

Beware, the NHS Restoration that Matt Hancock Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, is a complete lie. What is more likely is that you will receive a discharge letter like I received today from the Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust in the form of St Mary's Hospital for treatment that you have battled to get for years and fought to get. There will be no prcoessing of people in queues or waiting for treatment or starting treatment, no catch-up, no restoration, Mr Hancock is a LIAR. You will get a letter with the words: "Dear Patient, Due to the ongoing situation with Coronavirus pandemic,..... As it could be an extended time until normal planned services can resume, the clinical team have confirmed that under the current circumstances it would be appropriate to return your care to your GP in the short term, where you will ne able to refer at a later date if necessary."A nice simple way to fudge the statistics, refer your patients undergoing treatment back to their GPs so that they can wait for a FEW MORE YEARS before getting another referral.So much for the bollocks that Hancock said today: 'our message is that the NHS is open', 'seek help as you always would', 'the NHS will always be there as you need it', and 'starting tomorrow we will strt the restoration of the NHS.Absolutely a restoration once ALL THE PATIENTS HAVE BEEN DISCHARGED.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2017d12 Comments ● 2001d

WAITROSE and SOCIAL DISTANCING

Am I alone in finding West Ealing Waitrose falling sadly short of government requirements re social distancing during the Covid 19 crisis?Customers, for the most part, are not at fault. They keep two metres apart while waiting for the store to open but staff seem to think they are immune from the virus and the need to observe social distancing. I was waiting in the queue this morning at 7.15. A member of staff came bustling up to me and I had to put my hand out to tell her to 'Back off, please, and observe the 2 metre rule.' Her reply? 'Don't talk to me like that'.Once inside the shop, customers and shelf-stackers get in each other's way and the 2 metre rule goes out of the window. Shelf-stacking when the store is open early for more vulnerable customers is not a good idea. This morning, as I left the store, I looked in at the window and could hardly believe my eyes. The manager was holding a meeting in the cafeteria area (currently out of use qua cafeteria) with some 12 or so members of his staff where, if anything, there was less than one metre between persons. I felt grateful that there was a plate-glass window between me and that aberrancy.I sympathise with shop-keepers. Social distancing is not easy to enforce, but, currently, Waitrose is setting a poor example and, since Covid 19 is likely to be with us for a long time, it needs to scrutinise current practice and make changes. Let's start with a  wipe of trolley-handles (90% isopropyl, please). Tesco does it. Why not Waitrose? After that, better instore practice needs to follow. Customers and staff don't want to be exposed to unnecessary transmission risks nor do they want, potentially, to add to the massive burden already on NHS shoulders.

vincent paul wrigley ● 2022d10 Comments ● 2021d

Why SARS-CoV-2, Why Covid? Some thoughts

Pope says Covid-19 pandemic could be nature's "response" to climate change (CNN)For those of us looking for meaning in this plague about why SARS-Cov-2 and Covid-19 happened the Roman Catholic Pope Francis is providing food for thought into the "why" as we go into the great Christian festival of Easter. The philospher and spiritual leader thinks that, (according to CNN https://edition.cnn.com/world/live-news/coronavirus-pandemic-04-08-20/h_fa578270a745eb4e5b1321742a5a87f4), 'The coronavirus outbreak is one of “nature’s responses” to human beings ignoring the ecological crisis, said Pope Francis Wednesday.“We did not respond to the partial catastrophes. Who now speaks of the fires in Australia, or remembers that 18 months ago a boat could cross the North Pole because the glaciers had all melted? Who speaks now of the floods?" the Pope told British Catholic journalist Austen Ivereigh in an email interview published Wednesday in The Tablet and Commonwealth magazines.thI don’t know if these are the revenge of nature, but they are certainly nature’s responses.”Pope Francis also said he is recovering from his bronchitis and praying even more from his residence in the Vatican during this "time of great uncertainty."Francis revealed he goes to confession every Tuesday to ask forgiveness for his own selfishness. “I take care of things there,” he said.Francis said the homeless should be quarantined in hotels and not in parking lots.“A photo appeared the other day of a parking lot in Las Vegas where they [the homeless] had been put in quarantine. And the hotels were empty. But the homeless cannot go to a hotel,” the Pope said.“This is the moment to see the poor,” he said, whom society often treats as "rescued animals."The Pope warned against the rise of populist politicians, who he said are giving speeches reminiscent of Hitler in 1933, and others who are focusing solely on the economy.“I am worried by the hypocrisy of certain political personalities who speak of facing up to the crisis, of the problem of hunger in the world, but who in the meantime manufacture weapons,” he said.“Today I believe we have to slow down our rate of production and consumption and to learn to understand and contemplate the natural world."The Pope encouraged people at home on lockdown to find creative ways of being at home.“Take care of yourselves for a future that will come,” Francis said.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2034d2 Comments ● 2034d

Time to Postpone Trade Talks with the EU?

It perplexes me that more people are not raising the obvious question of why we are intending to persist with reshaping our relationship with the EU, a path which will involve a huge amount of dislocation for our economy when the coronavirus is already causing this to happen. This doesn't mean rejoining the EU but postponing the trade talks and remaining aligned with the single market until we are clear of the current crisis. The massive demands that the talks will place on an already overstretched civil service are bound to create a range of difficulties.Our PM is not known for his work ethic but even a more conscientous leader would struggle to cope with the workload that will be placed on them.If we leave the EU during a pandemic we reduce the ability of our universities to work with other institutions in Europe to develop a cure.It has already been reported that outside EU institutions we will not have the same access to EU developed vaccines that hopefully will become available.We have over the past few days had ample demonstration how even minor disruptions to supply chains can lead to hoarding and shortages. If the pandemic is still an issue and any new trading arrangement interrupt the free low of goods, there will be far worse scenes in our local shops and many people will have to go without basic essentials.The notion that freedom of movement presents an extra risk during a pandemic has been thoroughly disproven with EU countries closing their borders to each other for health reasons.If you don't agree that trade talks should be put on hold could you explain to me what are the benefits which outweigh all the negatives detailed above?

Mark Evans ● 2060d27 Comments ● 2053d

GOOD NEWS.

Although we are going through a worldwide crisis, possibly never known so bad in human history, things are going to get better. The Bible promises: "And God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for the former things are passed away." ( Revelation 21 v 4.) At present the whole world is going through a period known as the "last days" of a system that is about to be put right.2 Timothy 3:1-5 New International Version (NIV) says:(1)"But mark this: There will be terrible times in the last days. (2) People will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boastful, proud, abusive, disobedient to their parents, ungrateful, unholy, (3) without love, unforgiving, slanderous, without self-control, brutal, not lovers of the good, (4) treacherous, rash, conceited, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God— (5) having a form of godliness but denying its power. Have nothing to do with such people."Is that a huge coincindence or is that an apt description of how many people in the world are today?Luke 21:10-11 New International Version (NIV) states:10 Then he (Jesus) said to them: “Nation will rise against nation, and kingdom against kingdom. 11 There will be great earthquakes, famines and pestilences in various places, and fearful events........"What is happening worldwide surely qualifies as seeing fulfillment today.This is the storm before the calm.“ALL creation keeps on groaning together and being in pain together until now.” So said the apostle Paul. (Romans 8:22) Despite advances in medical science, sickness and death continue to plague the human race. How wonderful, then, the promise that climaxes this part of Isaiah’s prophecy! Imagine the time when “no resident will say: ‘I am sick.’” (Isaiah 33:24)

Neil Milkins ● 2054d0 Comments ● 2054d

CllrJulian Bell on Covid-19 Response "This is the time to get to get the reserves out and use them.”

I watched some children playing with their parents on the playground equipment in Walpole Park earlier and I wondered if you knew that the contagious result of touching the equpment even thee days later lingers there up to three days. The same with sports equipment in the park or in the gym. Likewise in a pub or cafe or restaurant oor even a business meeting,,microscopic water droplets hang in the air after an infected persons' visit for three hours, and were infectious for up to that long. Could Ealing not at least regulalry spray the outised playgrounds and sport equipment. Sadly running into Cllr Mik Saviers and Rupa Huq M.P a week ago I encountered a brick wall of ignorance, arrogrance, and a desire to spend nothing because onlo £9.8 million in the Council Reserves was available to Ealing Council and the rest was allocated. Oh their great emphasis was on the flu-related disaster plans that everyone had been touting in total ignorance of the enormous differece between flu and Covid-19. Unmitigated political bollocks from people who had no idea that there was  even Covid-19 in the Borough at that particular time.As the number of Covid-19 confirmed cases double from 21 to 42 overnight in Ealing  (as of 09:00) Wedneday 18th 2020 it was a belated relief to here an announcement by Council Leader Julian Bell:“I have already talked to my officers about how we need to have our own coronavirus emergency fund and use reserves for that,” Cllr Bell explained.“We always say reserves are for a rainy day and blimey this is a rainy day. This is the time to get the reserves out and use them.”First might I be so bold as to ask heim to a) empower chemists to make their own hand-sanitizer which they are not allowed to, b) divert front line staff to disinfect the children playground in the Boroughs, c) disinfect railings in popluar places such parks, tube stations, schools (those that are not closing), bus stop benches, ATM machines, lift buttons and interiors, buses, tube trains and trains, and perhaps even provide hand sanitisation stations all over the Borough, not forgetting any table or counter surface that has been touched as a plastic surface can carry an infectious load virus for up to three day. Likewise, ventilation is a must, and the virus droplets can hang around as microscopic droplets in the air around three hours and can causes infection, so open those hours and crack the air-conditioning system up to provide the most fresh coming in and old air getting out, it may be uncomfortable but it might save you from contracting the disease/ It is essential that hard surfaces like table and chairs and bar tops are regularly wiped and that the local cafes, pubs, glubs, restautans and their toilets and eashrooms are checked to make sure that there is soap hot water and towes and drierst ath workd (and perhaps some heatingin this cold weather too).The three hour aerosol virus in the air can be mitigated by goo ventilation such as opening windows and hours with the ait conditioning running on maximum fresh air into the building and old air oout of rather than recirculating it. Signs everwhere to remind people to wipe tables as well as thie hands.

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2057d0 Comments ● 2057d

If you are self employed or a sole operator/trader

Many self employed are finding all their bookings and contracts being cancelled or postponed indefinitely.  Worse still many are having invoiced payments deferred using Coronavirus as justification.Many of these larger companies will be receiving help and directors may well be keeping their huge salaries and bonuses.There are several petitions to help long term self employed who pay Tax and NI in full but do not get any assistance that people in PAYE get.Govt on TV today stated Local Authorities have a remit to help but both Govt and Local council websites are full of hot air and no actual proper contact or pragmatic adviceHowever The House of Commons are asking for specific questions from this quite large sector of society so, as posted to me from others posted below for others for whom this is a concern.“Include self-employed in statutory sick pay during Coronavirus”:https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/300336As the result of the large numbers of petitions and signatures we've received on coronavirus, we will be putting your concerns and questions directly to the Government at an evidence session (a question and answer session with representatives from the Government) in the coming days.Tell us what question(s) you'd like us to the ask the Government and experts in this short survey: https://www.smartsurvey.co.uk/s/petitionscommittee/We'll email you again to let you know more about the session, including when it's going to happen, who'll be taking part and how you can watch it live.We will also email you a link to the video and a transcript of the session afterwards.Who are we?We are the House of Commons Petitions Committee. We are a cross-party group of MPs that looks at e-petitions submitted on petition.parliament.uk. We are independent from Government. You can find out more about us and our work on our website: http://www.parliament.uk/petitions-committee/role

Raymond Havelock ● 2058d0 Comments ● 2058d

Cases of Covid-19 in Ealing continue to rise while Ealing Council and Politians are in denail

As of 9 a.m. this morning Sunday March 8th there were five cases of Covid-19 in the London Borough of Ealing. In London there are now 51.In the last three days the London figure as gone from 22 to 48 to 51.I had occassion to run into one of our M.P.'s Dr Rupa Huq this morning being escorted around by a man who I think was Mik Sabiersmwo very rudely shut me down and was really most unpleasant. It appears Ealing is unwilling to do anything and will not spend any nmoney as there is "only £8.9 million" in the reserves that could be spent in the area of sanitising Ealing and the like. According to Mr Sabiers, it the "job of the local health authority"I wrote a letter to Dr Huq M.P. which follows, Dear Dr Huq, M.P.I am somewhat stunned by the attitude of the Councillor, Mik Sabiers, who was taking you around Ealing this morning. I have rarely encountered a less pleasant individual on the streets of Ealing. I hope I did not startle you too much when I imparted the information that you did not know about the five cases of Covid-19 confirmed in Ealing as of yesterday morning, or the that the number had risen to 38 from 28 the day before for the whole of London. I tried to ask why if New York had declared a state of emergency for 17 cases why London had as yet to do anything. Your colleagues intervention at this point was inappropriate and very rude. He was wrong to say that this was an issue for the Health Authority. I had more to say, and following on from your article in Ealing Today about combating loneliness by stopping and talking to people  I took to mean that you actually cared about talking to people. Your colleague sent you away and handled me in a most dismissive and contemptuous manner. When I pointed out to him that he had been rude in interrupting my conversation with you and sending you away, he said that it is I who had in fact been rude, and that you were out to meet people. I guess I am not important enough to qualify. I tried to take to him about Covid-19 preparedness and got a load of political b/s. As he became more and more obnoxious about communication anything in a conversation I pressed him on the point of sanitation of bus stops, benches, etc, and all he did was become more and more agitated. He gave funding as an issues, and I pointed that there were reserves that could be spent, he said that only £8.9 million was available as the rest was committed, I pointed out that that would be a good start. I told him that he was the most obnoxious and unpleasant politician that I had ever eoncountered, to which he said: "Good" before leaving.I would strongly suggest that you not associate yourself with him on the streets of Ealing as he is doing nothing to win votes for the Labour Party at either the Council or Central Government level,What a horrible man,Yours sincerely,Mark Raymond,Ealing

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2068d4 Comments ● 2067d

Is our real problem Ealing's pension deficit?

Watching the rugby at the weekend I got into conversation with another group of people who were in the same bar and it turned into a very convivial afternoon. Given the result we wanted to talk about something more cheery so natuarally the subject switched to pensions rather than the match.The chap I was talking to seemed to know his stuff and told me that Ealing Council in particular had a major problem with their fund which was running a very substantial deficit. He said most local authorities had an issue because fewer people were joining council schemes because of outsourcing and head count reduction and more and more people were retiring and living longer but Ealing's short fall was more than most. He also said that at some point soon, just like many companies the borough will have to start covering the deficit which could be in the region of half a billion. There is no prospect that scheme income will make it self funding because, although head count has reduced, average salaries have increased significantly and generous early retirement packages remain in place. He said that Ealing like many other councils have reduced costs by persuading people to take retirement. This is actually more expensive but pushes when it needs to be paid for out into the future. His estimate was that by the end of this decade local taxes would need to double to make sure the pension fund was adequately funded.I really don't know enough about pensions and the way they work to know if this is alarmist nonesense or a timely warning. I have heard people say similar things before. It there anyone with expertise in these matters who could comment?

Andy Jones ● 2100d6 Comments ● 2084d

The Slow Death of the BBC

I was vaguely aware of how these might be difficult times for the BBC but until I read some coverage of recent event and spoke to people with some direct knowledge this weekend, I had little conception of how bad things where. The four hundred or so people who were sacked recently were told in no uncertain terms that they lost their jobs because the corporation needed to make savings after all the pay increases that became necessary after the Samira Ahmed judgement. They are so terrified of legal action about unfair pay (even from men) that they have erred on the side of caution. As they can no longer use the excuse of celebrity or public profile for paying someone more then they have to pay 'star' wages to people who are clearly not stars.  If this was the extent of their problems then they could weather the storm but this government (particular Dominic Cummings) really wants the corporation dismantled. The decriminalisation of non payment of the licence fee might seem a rational and fair move but it will have a massive impact on the BBC's finances as well having to fund over-75s licence fees. Restrictions on licence fee increases means that the ongoing squeeze on the BBC will continue and accelerate. Like most organisations forced to cut costs they seem incapable of trimming in the middle management executive positions where most of the fat is and content creation is where most of the jobs are going. They also have quite intractable unions to deal with and a pension fund deficit of £1.9bn and rising. Increasingly what's left of the BBC licence fee will go to fund this deficit and the pay of an unsackable but unproductive layer of middle management and fewer and fewer programmes will be made.

Gordon Southwell ● 2095d26 Comments ● 2085d

Ealing Labour Council and the hypocrisy of building 27 Council Homes

Ref: Ealing Council building 27 council homes on Dabbs Hill and Eastcote LaneLooking at the land in question, they could have built a lot more than 27 homes for council housing purposes.The phrase 'smoke and mirrors' comes to mind, and I would like Ealing Today to ask why this large expanse of land is only suitable for a total development of 45 homes (when you add the shared ownership angle and 4 private ones) at 4 storeys high when developers are convincing the Council to build 300 homes in high rise buildings, at 30 storeys,  in North Acton with only a small fraction going to take anyone off the council waiting list.I suppose we all know the answer though don't we...housing developers approaching the council prefer the resale capability of Acton etc, closer to the City etc, more £ for building smaller units if you are a major house builder.It seems the Council will headline this development, get pictured in their non-pressed, non-matching chinos and suit jacket (my word is this man Julian Bell really the leader of our area?), but it does nothing to address the concerns of normal people in our area that we are having our amenity provision and character ruined for generations by a Council completely hell bent on following Sadiq Khan's housing target numbers - that will do wonders for him as national politician, but erode communities that make up our city.They make a big play on this consultation - they only consult when it suits them!  Ask the residents over the type of consultation that go on by their established partner A2 Dominion for instance,  they put an animated, line drawing together in their recent proposals for West Ealing that even masked the height of the development, and did one afternoon presentation in the basement of a pub, and this consultation was for 25 storeys!  You could always email in though.....They only consult properly when it suits them, and I implore Ealing Today and all media organisations to get to the root of the issues here not just picture them handing over a set of keys and run a press release from them.I am really, really disappointed in Ealing Labour generally, the glad handing on this and it's telling that James Murray MP has joined the charade as he like the rest of the MPs are quick to tell us that planning is the Council's responsibility - so can we now write to him now and expect a valid response on the monstrosities that are planned in our Borough?  That have a small fraction of social housing element, but get waved through planning on this basis?  He wants pictured here on a planning housing issue so is it now permissible he will get involved in all matters on housing?Anyway not long now for Ealing's Labour Council and friends annual jolly to MPIM, a property conference, and sell off more of our Borough!

Steve Young ● 2106d16 Comments ● 2091d

Fuller Smith and Turner's Ecological Hypocrisy in Rose and Crown South Ealing's Plastic Lawn

Friends of mine continue to be shocked by the petroleum product based plastic lawn that now carpets the garden at the back. Not a living blade of grass. Not a living thing.Few who went into the Rose and Crown last summer were not shocked by the appearance of acres of plastic lawn. Home of the Hanwell and Ealing Allotment Group, the Friends of the Ascott Allotment, and even Transition Town Ealing (not to mention Ealing'g green vicar, Steve, next door in St Mary's Church with his own ecological movement) one could not fathom Fuller's rationale behind this, clearly it was not going to grow the business by dumping a ton of petroleum-sourced chemical grass in the back garden, was it trying to distance itself from the ecowarriors?Not according to Fuller's website:https://www.fullers.co.uk/corporate/csr/environment"Environment"Fuller’s is committed to a programme of continuous environmental improvement, constantly investigating new ways to cut carbon emissions, reduce waste and save water."By targeting high-energy areas of the business, including kitchen extract, refrigeration and the lighting and heating of our pubs, we aim to match or exceed the UK Government’s long-term carbon reduction targets."The Government targets came into effect in 2008, and seek to reduce the nation’s overall emissions to 2,782 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (MtCO2e)"There is much on the Fuller's website about environmental responsibility and in the annual report too.What has gone wrong here at the Rose and Crown in South Ealing, a rogue establishment creating a blot in the Fuller's eco-copybook and eco-play. How can the local environmentalists cope with this sacrilige of theire favourite (once eco) venue?

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2095d4 Comments ● 2094d

Beware of new NO ENTRY sign on Manor Road, West Ealing when picking up your parcels

In November my wife got two PCNs for ignoring a brand new NO ENTRY sign on Manor Road which stops you going straight back out to Argyle Road after you have picked up your parcels from the Post Office depot on Manor Road.  Talking to the bloke in the enforcement van/car this new restriction has been in place for three weeks and they are giving out lots of tickets.  My wife is not the type to ignore street signs but she is the type to not notice that the road layout has changed if it is only discreetly signed.   There is no NO LEFT TURN sign on the adjacent Drayton Road and there are no yellow additional information signs of the type the council was forced to put up when they changed the layout around the Town Hall.  It is a bit of a trap for the unwary.  I will post some photos underneath.  The council must know that Manor Road attracts infrequent but regular visitors who are likely to get caught by a change in the road layout.  I did ask the guy behind the counter in the Post Office if they could put up a sign to inform their customers but he was practically indignant that I should suggest such a thing.  Jobsworthism still alive and well in the privatised Post Office parcels business.  In passing I asked a CEO (traffic warden in old money) why they didn't ticket the Post Office vans on the single yellow lines outside the Post Office.  Apparently the parking managers insists they wait 20 minutes!  So one rule for the Post Office and one rule for everyone else.

Phil Taylor ● 2161d12 Comments ● 2097d

Is Expanding Durston House School good for everyone?

I should say from the outset I'm very much against private education in principle and would readily accept its prevalence in the UK is divisive and chronically undermines social mobility. However we have the education system that we have and lack the funds to build a perfect one. Therefore we have to consider what is best for everyone. The big argument for private education and the general good is that it takes the cost of education a significant number of children away from the state. The provision of a hundred extra places by Durston House will be one hundred fewer than the rest of us have to pay for. There are good reasons for people in the area around the school to be concerned about extra traffic but most of this is not generated by the school rather it is the result of council policy. Traffic caused by the school will be concentrated into two relatively short and predictable periods each day. Having lived near a school myself I know it is just a matter of avoiding unnecessary travel at these times to ensure the impact on your life is minimal. The current application seems to provide the option of more facilities that will be available to the local community. What people shouldn't forget is that ultimately planning applications are decided on the basis of whether or not they are within planning law not whether they have public support. The land belongs to the school and if expansion is turned down they might consider alternative uses that would be even less welcome.

Dennis O'Shea ● 2387d25 Comments ● 2106d

Avoid B&Q Chiswick it no longer has toilets for customers, practically no plants in thegarden centre

I have written to B and Q, meanwhile the nearest facilities are probably a tree Gunnersbury Park 200 yards up the North Circular Road over the railway bridge. Be prepared. The question that comes to mind is B&Q running the Chiswick store down to close it?To the CEO of B & QWhere have the toilets gone in B&Q Chiswick? Why has the garden centre got no seasonal stock like trees and shrubs? Are you closing the store?Mr Graham BellCEOB and QUK and IrelandDear Mr Bell,I make no excuses about contacting a man as busy as you are as I was absolutely stunned when I (somewhat painfully) found out that the B&Q Superstore on the Chiswick Rooundabout in London no longer has toilets for customers. When I asked where they were I was told: "We don't have any". There have been toilets there in the past, I know I have made use of them. Is this a new policy for the whole of B&Q or unique to B&Q Chisiwck Roundabout (2 Larch Dr, Gunnersbury Ave, London W4 5QL)?.  As more progressive retailers move towards more enlightened facilities such as baby change and feeding areas. I find this move on the part of your company strange to say the least. I note that on your list of facilitieson the B&Q website  for this store include-Portable induction loops available-Customer wheelchairs available-Disabled parking bays availableBut with all this why no toilets?There is a bathroom showroom showing toilet, you can buy a toilet in the store, but there are no customer toilets for use by customers.I had noticed on recent visits the almost complete lack of living plant stock (to my inconvenience) in the garden centre which should be filled with trees and srhubs that are planted between late Autumn and early Spring, however it is barren. I must ask, are you about to close this store? That is the only explanation that I can find in my mind for the removal of basic sanitary facilities and the abscence of relevant seasonal garden stock?Somewhat flabbergasted,I remain,Yours sincerely,Mark Julian Raymond

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2118d15 Comments ● 2109d

The Victoria Hall DOES NOT NEED SAVING, help Ealing people rather than mouldering victoriana

The Victoria Hall (part of the Old Town Hall) DOES NOT NEED SAVING, it is a piece of uneconomic Vistoriana (of questionnable architectural merit as Charles Jones who designed and builtit apparently started off training as an architect, but ended up qualified as an engineer) that without the investment of several million poinds cannot be used for anything other than as a draughty Victorian hall. As libraries close, disabled centres disappear, mental health support disappears we are left with a bunch of second-rate activists looking for a cause. Hey, if we need a theatre then put a plan together, raise the money and build one, if it is economically viable as the acitivists claim then they should put their money where their mouths are, get a great big mortgage, put up their houses and business as collateral and make a fat profit, if it is not profitable then why are the people of Ealing being asked to underwrite a fools errand?If the plan was to turn it into half-way housing, short term social housing, a disabled support facility, a multi-media library resource facility, even a soup kitchem, so many things that people could get behind to hekp others in Ealing, however, a subsidised entertainment facility with a bar?To me it makes more sense to shed the overhead of this relic (having preserved its architectural heritage (such as it is) which is happening, move on and spend the money saved from not having to maintain this decaying facikity along with the money earned through renting it out to a hotel into something USEFUL, social housing, a libray, a much, much better option

Mark Julian Raymond ● 2125d22 Comments ● 2118d

MindFood - all our nature-based courses are FREE!!

Happy New Year from everyone at MindFood! For anyone who doesn’t know us yet, we are a small local charity (reg. no 1185639) running nature-based courses that help people to tackle stress, depression, anxiety and isolation. All our sessions are FREE, run 6 days a week, and we can sign you up right away...so why wait to feel better : )Our Growing Wellbeing courses are a fun and informal way to reconnect with nature, learn how to grow food, and pick up tips and techniques to improve wellbeing, like mindfulness. Participants can take home veg they’ve helped to grow, and can even join a free trip to Kew at the end. Here are the upcoming dates:Wed 22nd Jan 10.30-12.30 at Cleveley Crescent AllotmentsFriday 24th Jan 1-3.30pm at Cleveley Crescent Allotments (W5 1DZ)Tues 25th Feb at Horsenden Farm (UB6 7PB)We’ve chosen to run the Cleveley Crescent courses at around the same time to allow participants to swap into another session in the same week if they can’t make their usual one. This makes it easier to complete the whole programme - so these sessions are ideal for anyone juggling tricky work or care commitments. It’s even possible to join in week 2 if timing’s are tight.We also run Naturally Creative sessions at Horsenden on Thursdays 10-12, which combine mindful nature-based activities eg a walk or a forage (or both!) and an opportunity to develop your creative side with sketching, making collages, willow-weaving, and more...Every Saturday, we have Plot to Plate sessions at the Farm from 10-12 - they’re the ideal way to de-stress after a busy week, and a great way to meet more of your community.And finally, look out for details of our Seed Swap event in February - you’re sure to pick up a bargain, and some unusual finds. Follow us on facebook, or sign up for our monthly newsletter to stay up to date with our latest news.To sign up or find out more, just email Lucy at info@mindfood.org.uk

Lucy Clark ● 2120d0 Comments ● 2120d

MindFood - all our nature-based courses are FREE!!

Happy New Year from everyone at MindFood! For anyone who doesn’t know us yet, we are a small local charity (reg. no 1185639) running nature-based courses that help people to tackle stress, depression, anxiety and isolation. All our sessions are FREE, run 6 days a week, and we can sign you up right away...so why wait to feel better : )Our Growing Wellbeing courses are a fun and informal way to reconnect with nature, learn how to grow food, and pick up tips and techniques to improve wellbeing, like mindfulness. Participants can take home veg they’ve helped to grow, and can even join a free trip to Kew at the end. Here are the upcoming dates:Wed 22nd Jan 10.30-12.30 at Cleveley Crescent AllotmentsFriday 24th Jan 1-3.30pm at Cleveley Crescent Allotments (W5 1DZ)Tues 25th Feb at Horsenden Farm (UB6 7PB)We’ve chosen to run the Cleveley Crescent courses at around the same time to allow participants to swap into another session in the same week if they can’t make their usual one. This makes it easier to complete the whole programme - so these sessions are ideal for anyone juggling tricky work or care commitments. It’s even possible to join in week 2 if timing’s are tight.We also run Naturally Creative sessions at Horsenden on Thursdays 10-12, which combine mindful nature-based activities eg a walk or a forage (or both!) and an opportunity to develop your creative side with sketching, making collages, willow-weaving, and more...Every Saturday, we have Plot to Plate sessions at the Farm from 10-12 - they’re the ideal way to de-stress after a busy week, and a great way to meet more of your community.And finally, look out for details of our Seed Swap event in February - you’re sure to pick up a bargain, and some unusual finds. Follow us on facebook, or sign up for our monthly newsletter to stay up to date with our latest news.To sign up or find out more, just email Lucy at info@mindfood.org.uk

Lucy Clark ● 2120d0 Comments ● 2120d

Discover Me! open day today at Oaktree Acton

Your friendly local church, Oaktree, are putting on a number of events which might be of interest to people in the community on the theme of “Discover Me!” There will be an open day TODAY Saturday 11th January from 11am to 4pm at the Oaktree Centre at 216, High Street, Acton W3 9NX when people can come along and find out more / sign up – everyone very welcome!The groups will be running for 9/10 weeks from the end of the month and are as follows:West London Wellbeing CourseThis is a fun 9 week course covering themes such as move eat sleep relax - actions that can increase our health and happiness. There'll be a mix of video, individual and small group chat, and lots of fun.Sign up up on Eventbrite: bit.ly/38Poo03  The Enneagram HubWe will look at the 9 personality types, not for teaching an intellectual understanding, but for transformation and growth as a community, experiencing the Enneagram together.The Parenting Children CourseFamily life is under great pressure today and parents face bewildering choices about how to parent effectively. Discovering we are not alone in the challenges we face and picking up ideas from other parents can make a huge difference. We can all learn how to make even the happiest family better. The Parenting Children Course and The Parenting Teenagers Course were developed to equip parents and carers of children with long-term strategies and practical tools to build a healthy family life. Here is an introductory video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY8thZ_W2gYThe Marriage CourseA seven-session course designed to help couples invest in their relationship and build a stronger marriage. There is food, a practical talk, and a time for private discussion between you and your partner. There is no group work. It will help you build strong foundations, communicate more effectively and resolve any differences well. Here is a video flyer: www.youtube.com/watch?v=qba2wYpXgUs&feat…Finding God in PoetryPoetry allows one to see into the soul of another person, to see what is weighing on their minds and on their hearts, and can open doors to feelings that are sometimes suppressed until that door is opened" (Robert Brewer)This group is an invitation to reflect on these deepest thoughts and feelings, and to learn more about God and His relationship with us. No prior knowledge of poetry is required. Just a willingness to slow down, reflect and explore! Sign up here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/finding-god-in-poetry-tickets-87530340605The Bible CourseThis is a Bible Society course that uses a storyline to show how the key events, books and characters fit in the Bible. You get to see how the Bible applies to your life.If anyone is interested but can’t get to the open day today, feel free to PM me via the site.

Prabal Ray ● 2125d1 Comments ● 2124d

Recycle Your Cooking Oil  and Stop Feeding the Rats

Ealing started offering a free collection of cooking oil from businesses several years ago.  It now seems that residents can recyle their cooking oil too.  You only have to see the photographs of the sewers to realise why the rats like it down there and why this is a good idea!Here is the Council Press Release regarding this."Ealing slick at cooking oil recyclingPublished 7 January 2011An Ealing Council recycling centre is top of the tables for waste cooking oil collection. Greenford Recycling Centre has collected the most cooking oil for recycling in London, and the second highest volume in the country. In the last two years, residents have deposited a massive 6,110 litres at Greenford, and another 1,950 litres at Acton making a total of 8,060 litres.Just one litre of used cooking oil can be converted into a new green fuel called LF100 to produce enough clean electricity to make 240 cups of tea. The total amount collected in Ealing is enough to power eight homes for a year or an energy-saving 20W light bulb for each Ealing resident for five and a half hours*.Residents can dispose of old cooking oil at Ealing Council’s Reuse and Recycling centres in Acton and Greenford. The waste cooking oil is recycled by Living Fuels - part of the British group Renewable Energy Generation - to produce a green fuel to power electricity generators which feed into the National Grid.Pouring cooking oil down the sink is a problem for a number of reasons - it clogs up drains and sewers, is hazardous to wildlife if it is allowed to seep into the water table, and it wastes precious unused energy.Councillor Bassam Mahfouz, cabinet member for Transport and Environment, said: “It’s great news that residents have taken to waste oil recycling with the same enthusiasm that they have shown for all our other recycling services. I would encourage everyone to save used cooking oil left over from cooking, and take it to their nearest recycling centre. Not only will this produce clean and green electricity, it will also save drains from getting blocked.“So, do an extra bit for the environment and make recycling your used cooking oil one of this year's resolutions." Acton Re-use and Recycling Centre in Stirling Road, Greenford Re-use and Recycling Centre in Greenford Road, and Southall Re-use and Recycling Centre in Gordon Road are open Mon-Sun, 8am-5pm (between 1 April-30 September) and 8am-4pm (between 1 October-31 March). Further information on recycling in Ealing is available. * Based on statistics from the Centre for Alternative Technology. "

Philippa Bond ● 5389d11 Comments ● 2127d

Rupa Huq and animal cruelty

Fox-hunting is in the news, apparently.  I don’t know why as the Conservative Party has at last had the humanity to abandon any attempt to re-legalise it. Labour candidate Rupa Huq, however, claims (3.12.19) she has received emails asking her views.  She writes: “I am resolutely AGAINST and oppose all blood sports which I find cruel and barbaric.  Here I am campaigning on the issue with Brian May, Queen guitarist.  This is a piece of retrospective virtue-signalling and a chance to fish out an old photo of herself with a celebrity.But what about the cruel and barbaric practice of halal slaughter? The Labour manifesto states it will ensure policy is informed by the latest scientific evidence on animal sentience.  There is mention of “a review of standards within slaughterhouses.” No mention of the present dispensation in law for religious groups to slaughter without stunning.  Rupa Huq wrote about it (7.1.18).   Let us examine her words.   They reveal her character.  She promotes the practice and defames people who object to it as racists.  She wrote (7.1.18): “Was sent this from as colleague in Oxford. Some mums there are up in arms with a primary school’s decision to serve halal meat only. There are loads of comments up. They are divided between the usual “political correctness gone mad” brigade and those who see these protests as just an excuse for covert racism – I tend towards the latter.”So, she thinks that this group of people – none of whom she knows - are racists.  Upon what basis?  None.  They are racists just because they oppose halal slaughter.  And ALL of them are racist.  Demonising a whole group of people is STEREOTYPING, particularly perverse in Huq’s case because she knows none of them.  “Presumably these parents don’t complain in Indian restaurants where halal meat served?" Why presume that?  If they don’t wish to consume halal meat the logical presumption is that they would. This silly remark is intended to paint the people as islamophobic. “It can be argued that halal and kosher slaughter of animals – a simple slit to the throat by knife is more humane than a long-lingering death by stun gun.”The phrase “a simple slit” betrays Huq’s ignorance. The evidence of the RSPCA is that even a rapid movement with a sharp knife cuts through skin, muscle, trachea, oesophagus, carotid arteries, jugular veins, major nerve trunks, and numerous minor nerves, resulting in significant pain and distress before insensibility supervenes, which in the case of a calf can last up to 2 minutes. .As to her “long lingering death by stun gun”. What is her scientific evidence to support that argument?   She has none.  Evidence is to the contrary. The proposition is inherently ridiculous.  She goes on:“Both McDonalds in Southall and Subway sandwich bar on Kingston University campus only serve halal meat as (i) there is a demand from customers and (ii) people of other religions or none are not forbidden from eating it." They are not “forbidden”, but they choose not to eat halal meat because of the pain it has inflicted on animals.  It is their right to do that and to say what they say according to their moral beliefs which are just as valid as her religious beliefs.    They are forbidden by their own conscience and sense of human decency in not wishing to consume the product of animal cruelty.  Huq, in her intolerance of other people’s beliefs, brands them as racists. According to Huq, anyone who objects to halal slaughter is guilty of “covert racism”. That must include the  RSPCA.  And, of course, they must be guilty of Islamophobia by expressing an opinion critical of the beliefs and practices of Islam.   As to a university campus, A student at Lancaster University was banned from lectures after he said he wouldn’t eat a Subway or a KFC because they used halal meat. “I’m completely against ritual slaughter - it causes the animal to suffer. I said this is showing the impact of the UK becoming Islamified.”  Fellow students complained.  He was suspended unless he took part in a ‘diversity training course’.  Every university, I suspect, has a pack of alt-left activists who bully in order to suppress a right to free speech. I wonder, if such an incident had arisen in Kingston University, what the opinion of member of staff Rupa Huq would have been?  She would have “tended” to call him a racist.Huq cares for the animals when there is a political point to be made, not as a matter of principle.  She reveals herself in her short message to be intolerant and disrespectful of other people’s beliefs and casually accuses them of racism, a criminal offence. 

Andrew Farmer ● 2159d12 Comments ● 2155d

CIC Forces Closure of Gunnersbury Park Bowls Club

The following was posted by Bela Cunha on the Chiswick forum: Gunnersbury Park Bowling Club was founded in 1931. When the Community (now, there's a misnomer!) Interest Company took over the running of the Park, bowls club members were assured that CIC valued bowling, wished to see it continue and wanted to discuss ways of increasing the general public's use of the green. What were those assurances worth? Or Hounslow's Joint Health and Wellbeing Strategy, with its laudable aims of promoting both, but, in reality, nothing but hot air? Now the sports hall is running massively late and needs more money (were late-finishing penalties not included in the building contract?) and CIC have decided to kick out the bowls club to replace it with a secret sporting activity to produce revenue. CIC refuse to reveal what the secret activity is or explain why there is such a need for secrecy. The bowls club did not cost the councils a penny; members looked after everything, including the upkeep of the green. Yet we are the sacrificial lamb, in another example of CIC short-sighted short-termism. They claim our site is just right for the secret activity, but is it really believable that, had there been any goodwill or readiness to look for another alternative, there is nowhere else in the park that could accommodate it? When/if this venture fails to generate the required revenue and packs up and leaves the park, the bowling green cannot be restored. Bowling was the one activity in the park for the older members of the community; the bowling club was for many years the place where we stayed active, socialised with friends and held competitions with other local clubs. All that has been disregarded and summarily thrown out by the autocratic CIC - judge and jury, unaccountable to the community whose interests it's meant to safeguard, not subject to oversight and strangers to transparency.

Gordon Southwell ● 2168d12 Comments ● 2156d

RUPA HUQ UNFIT FOR PUBLIC OFFICE

Unfit for office for many reasons.When asked to condemn a landlord who had tenants living in filth and fire-hazard for years and the council officer who perversely reappointed him as fit to preside over an HMO, Rupa Huq failed to respond.  She put protecting the reputation of the local Labour council above care for the safety of her constituents.She has failed to respond to representations from constituents whose lives are being made a misery by a gang of Ukrainians who conduct a trading activity outside their homes and threaten and attack residents, all this occurring due to the negligence of Ealing Council. She defended the anti-semitic posts of Naz Shah.   All she could say in her own defence was that she was naïve.  She is over forty and supposedly well-educated. I want something better than “naïve” for my MP, especially when it leads to defending anti-semitic obscenities such as saying “everything Hitler did was legal” and suggesting the SOLUTION (sinister word) for the Israel/Palestinian problem was relocating Israel in the USA.    When asked to condemn Shah’s post and condemn her for anti-semitism, she ignored the correspondence.  She failed to condemn. She condoned.  She is as bad as Shah. When asked to condemn the violent language of Jess Phillips, who wrote she would knife Jeremy Corbyn “in the front, not the back” if it looked like he was damaging the party’s chances of electoral success, she failed to respond to the correspondence.  She failed to condemn the words.  She condoned them.  She is as bad as Phillips.    When asked to condemn Shah, who shared a tweet saying child abuse victims “should keep their mouths shut” for the sake of Diversity and next posted a tribute to Winnie Mandela with a “meme”  which promoted murdering people by putting a tyre round their necks and burning them to death, she failed to respond to the correspondence.  She failed to condemn the words.  She condoned them.  She is as bad as Shah.  She defended the use of halal slaughter, condemned by the RSPCA, and did so in total ignorance of scientific evidence.  She condemned as racists a group of people of whom she knew nothing for no other reason than that they opposed it according to their own moral values. She was intolerant of other people’s beliefs.  The accusation was unfounded and defamatory. She was accused of anti-semitic behaviour by staff. The supposed investigation was held in secret. When asked for a transcript of the proceedings, her representative made the idiotic excuse that it could not be released because it would undermine the independence of the investigation.  How could a report of an investigation affect its independence once it has been concluded!  She also misrepresented the verdict of “insufficient evidence” and declared Huq had been completely exonerated.   A vote for Huq is a vote for tolerance of anti-semitic hate-speech and violent language by MPs and unfounded accusations against people who happen to disagree with Islamic practices.  It is a vote for indifference to the conditions in which people in HMOs are obliged to live.  And, if you have hope that Labour Party concern for the humane treatment of animals will lead to banning unstunned slaughter, I think you know how Huq would vote.  Carry on slitting the throats of the lambs of God!  When you vote, vote for whomsoever you judge best placed to rid us of the shame of having Huq as our MP.

Andrew Farmer ● 2158d1 Comments ● 2157d

CHEAP GOT CHEAPER

Cheap got cheaper.  I pointed out how cheap it was of Rupa Huq to make political capital out of the stabbing that occurred near me home.  It was all to do with “the cuts”.  Here we go again.  Two people murdered by a moslem terrorist.  First Khan, the mayor not the moslem terrorist, tells us how wonderful Diversity is.  Some people hate it, he said. Little wonder when it yields an individual such as Kahn. Then we have Labour laying the blame for his release and so the murders on cuts in the funding of prisons and the probation service.   The blame for the incident was Kahn.  He was evil.   Not a word one hears too often today.  Instead we have excuses.   In this case in the Guardian from Kahn’s lawyer.   “He requested intervention by a deradicaliser when he was in prison, Sharif said”.Might that have been because he wanted to look good as he was intending to appeal? “The only option was the probation service ….  Probation do a good job with conventional offenders but they can’t deal with ideological offenders.”They can deal with ALL inmates according the obligation of their role,  which is not to discuss interpretations of religions.   For that, inmates have representatives of various religions available.    I cannot believe Kahn did not have access to an Imam during his years of imprisonment.  If he did, then the statement that “the only option was the probation service” is a false statement.His lawyer claims he “accepted his understanding of Islam was deficient” but “extremists may have targeted him to be regroomed after release from jail”. It’s those groomers again, never the responsibility of the individual.And what was his understanding of Islam?  And what is the proper understanding of Islam, according to its Scholars?  When they make up their minds, they will be able to tell us.   For now, the politically convenient understanding is that it the religion of peace.  

Andrew Farmer ● 2166d0 Comments ● 2166d

Is Ealing Central and Acton a safe seat for Labour?

I've had a number of conversations in the area about what seems likely to be a general election in the near future. Nearly everybody I have spoken to voted Labour in the last election, these included not just life-long Labour party supporters but dyed in the wool Tories and floating voters.The reasons were various but boiled down to three main factors with Brexit being the main one obviously. The other factors most often mentioned were Theresa May's social care plans and the belief that there was zero chance of Jeremy Corbyn becoming prime minister.Given that Rupa Huq is widely acknowledged to be a good constituency MP and she won a massive majority last time out it may seem preposterous to think in terms of her not winning at the next vote. However, it shouldn't be forgotten that she previously held the seat with a tiny majority and it was initially expected that she might not win.My unrepresentative sample suggests that circumstances this time will deprive her of some of the votes she had before. Jeremy Corbyn being prime minister is a much more likely scenario which means that disaffected Tories and many habitual Labour voters are not going to back her. Also her huge majority was in large part a protest vote against Brexit. Although her personal record on the subject is impeccable, her party's is not and many people wanting to signal support for remaining in the EU are going to vote Lib Dem. Plus this time the Greens will probably stand losing her more votes.Whether or not these changes are enough to put the seat at risk is debatable but Rupa probably needs to brace herself for a much reduced majority. It will be interesting to see the resources the Tories committ to the constituency because they will probably need a few surprise results to form a government and no doubt Dominic Cummings is looking very closely at all the data.

Andy Jones ● 2245d46 Comments ● 2169d

Equality Trust Pledge - Where are the Torys?

The Equality Trust was founded in 2009 to examine the effects of inequality on society and, following the significant findings, is now funded by the Joseph Rowntree Charitable Trust.Great inequality is the scourge of modern societies. The Equality Trust has provided the evidence on each of eleven different health and social problems: physical health, mental health, drug abuse, education, imprisonment, obesity, social mobility, trust and community life, violence, teenage births, and child well-being. For all eleven of these health and social problems, outcomes are very substantially worse in more unequal societies. They have also checked the relationships wherever possible in two independent test beds: internationally among the rich countries, and then again among the 50 states of the USA. In almost every case they have found the same tendency for outcomes to be much worse in more unequal societies in both settings.During this election period the Trust has asked parliamentary and local council candidates to show they're committed to reducing income inequality by signing the following statement:"Compelling new evidence presented by The Equality Trust shows that more equal societies - those with a narrower gap between rich and poor – are more cohesive, healthier, suffer fewer social problems and are more environmentally sustainable. In view of these findings I am committed to making the UK a more equal society as the most effective means of building a better society. I will therefore actively support the case for policies designed to narrow the gap between rich and poor; and engage with the debate on which measures should be implemented to achieve that aim."The 290 pledges given so far (Sat 10th) give us an interesting picture. The percentages by party I have discovered are: Green Party: 36%Liberal Democrats: 32%Labour: 21%Conservative: 7%Other: 4%Readers can draw their own conclusions from this and some candidates may say that they were unaware of the pledge which is in any case telling.The question for me is if so few conservatives are unaware or unwilling to make this pledge how can the Tory’s “Big Society” idea really be the panacea that David 's Cameron talks about?However I do welcome the upper limit for the public sector announced by the Tory at 20 times that of the lowest paid. However, if this is to have any real impact (20 times has little impact) it should be set at 10 times as set by the Greens for both the private and public sectors. To my mind the “Big Society” can only succeed without the “Great Inequality”.http://www.equalitytrust.org.uk/ C BRYANhttp://conradbryan.blogspot.com/

Conrad Bryan ● 5674d27 Comments ● 2172d

Does Rupa Huq Car?

Dear Rupa Huq, Do you care? I wrote to you some time ago about a neighbourhood problem:  a landlord with an appalling record and a council officer who, knowing his record, licensed him as a fit and proper person to have control of an HMO.   I received an automated respond but nothing more.  I felt that, because there was criticism of the Labour Local Authority in my email, you were putting your party before the safety of the lives of your constituents.Here is a chance to redeem yourself.  I am putting the matter to you again. THE BAD LANDLORD:  ThamesHouse Property Ltd.  For several years the landlord had been using his property (354-6 Uxbridge Road) as an HMO without planning consent.   The tenants were housed in damp rooms with cracked, mouldy walls; the smoke-alarm was taped over; the fire escape route was blocked and there were no proper fire-doors.   THE COUNCIL OFFICER Mark Wiltshire Wilshire knew all this.  He also knew the tenants were causing neighbourhood nuisance.  He was supplied with evidence that the landlord had admitted it but was doing nothing about it.  He had over thirty statements from neighbours setting out the antisocial behaviour they were suffering from the tenants: drunken noise within the building and a squalid business they were operating in the street outside, polluting the air with engines left running, fouling the road with empty food cartons and intimating passers-by. Wiltshire licensed this landlord as a fit and proper person to have control of large-scale HMO. As a candidate for the social-justice Labour Party that claims to care for “generation rent”, will you condemn this landlord, whose record was of a merchant in filth and fire-hazard, as unfit to have control of a large-scale HMO and unwelcome in our Borough and will you condemn the council officer, who ignored his record and who know rejoices in the title Director of Safer Communities, as unit to hold office? And BEFORE the election would be nice, JUST TO SHOW THAT YOU CARE.I am copying this to the local Labour Party as I am not clear whether you are receiving emails via Westminster. Andrew Farmer

Andrew Farmer ● 2188d32 Comments ● 2176d

October smiles

If I had a dollar for every girl that found me unattractive, they'deventually find me attractive. I find it ironic that the colors red, white, and blue stand forfreedom, until they're flashing behind you. Today a man knocked on my door and asked for a small donation towardsthe local swimming pool, so I gave him a glass of water. I changed my password to "incorrect" so whenever I forget it thecomputer will say, "Your password is incorrect." Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity. I'm great at multi-tasking--I can waste time, be unproductive, andprocrastinate all at once. If you can smile when things go wrong, you have someone in mind to blame. Never tell your problems to anyone, because 20 percent don't care andthe other 80 percent are glad you have them. Doesn't expecting the unexpected mean that the unexpected is actually expected? Take my advice — I'm not using it. My wife and I were happy for twenty years; then we met. I hate it when people use big words just to make themselves soundperspicacious. Hospitality is the art of making guests feel like they're at home whenyou wish they were. Television may insult your intelligence, but nothing rubs it in like acomputer. I bought a vacuum cleaner six months ago and so far all it's beendoing is gathering dust. Every time someone comes up with a foolproof solution, along comes amore-talented fool. I'll bet you $4,567 you can't guess how much I owe my bookie. Behind every great man is a woman rolling her eyes. If you keep your feet firmly on the ground, you'll have troubleputting on your pants. A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing. Ever stop to think and forget to start again? When I married Mr. Right, I had no idea his first name was Always. My wife got 8 out 10 on her driver's test--the other two guys managedto jump out of her way. There may be no excuse for laziness, but I'm still looking. Women spend more time wondering what men are thinking than men spend thinking. Give me ambiguity or give me something else. He who laughs last thinks slowest. Is it wrong that only one company makes the game Monopoly? Women sometimes make fools of men, but most guys are the do-it-yourself type. I was going to give him a nasty look, but he already had one. Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine. The grass may be greener on the other side but at least you don't haveto mow it. I like long walks, especially when they're taken by people who annoy me. I was going to wear my camouflage shirt today, but I couldn't find it. If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you. Sometimes I wake up grumpy; other times I let her sleep. If tomatoes are technically a fruit, is ketchup a smoothie? Money is the root of all wealth. No matter how much you push the envelope, it'll still be stationery. I asked the person if it was apathy or a lack of empathy, he said "I don't know and I don't care"

Graham Weeks ● 2199d0 Comments ● 2199d

Canning Town - the End for Extinction Rebellion

It's hard to decide what to make of the events at Canning Town train station. Overall I suppose it was a positive given the number of people who were prepared to stand between an angry mob and those who were determined to make their life more difficult. The incident perhaps shows the flaw in the idea of Extinction Rebellion. I am completely onboard with the idea that something needs to be urgently done on climate change and am comfortable with the idea that at times that might mean protest that skirts legality when there is no viable effective alternative. The problem that is developing is that many members of Extinction Rebellion have reached the conclusion that the strength and importance of their argument means that any protest they make must by definition be right. Causing inconvenience and financial loss to people who in many cases will be on much lower incomes than them is a necessary part of making their point they will claim. The idea of disrupting public transport is self-evidently daft but because Extinction Rebellion is against any sort of proper organisational structure there isn't really any way to stop people associated with the campaign from holding counter-active protests. This means that there probably will be more like the Canning Town incident in which the protestors are more interested in attention seeking than making a coherent point and this is what the media will focus on. Every time this happens more people will write Extinction Rebellion off as a group of deliberately annoying hippies.

Dennis O'Shea ● 2211d13 Comments ● 2207d

Ground Penetrating Radar Scan.

I am a True Crime Writer and Television Investigative Consultant. I have for the past 14 years been researching the horrendous crimes committed by Abertillery-born Harold Jones. In 1921, Jones then aged 15 murdered 2 Abertillery, Wales schoolgirls, Freda Burnell aged 8 and 11 year-old Florence Little. After being released from prison in 1941 Jones served 5 years in the army before settling in Fulham, Putney and finally Hammersmith where he died in 1971. Jones used a number of names during his time in London - first Harold Jones, then Harry Stevens and finally Harry Jones. Research has led myself and many criminal experts to believe that Jones went on to become the serial killer known as the Hammersmith Nudes' Killer (1959-1965.) https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/488557/is-this-man-the-real-jack-the-stripper/These 8 unsolved killings have over the past 11 years been given much media attention. In 2011 a one hour drama documentary titled Fred Dinenage Murder Casebook - Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer has been shown repeatedly on various satellite Channels worldwide. (Google Harold Jones -The Welsh Killer.) This led to a major 90 minute national television documentary which was shown in January and February 2019. (Google Dark Son - The Hunt For A Serial Killer to see trailers.) In the early 1960's Jones using the name Harry Stevens  had lived in Fulham, 2 streets away from 3rd nudes's victim Hannah Tailford. In 1964 and 1965 whilst living in Putney under the name Harry Stevens, he was AT THE SAME TIME occupying a rented house in Hammersmith using the name Harry Jones. This was 2 streets away from 7th nudes victim Frances Brown and 8th nudes' victim Bridget O'Hara. It is my belief that there may be trophies buried in the garden at Hammersmith and the owner has now given me permission to use ground-penetrating radar to detect any such evidence.I am trying to locate someone in the film or media industry or anyone else who would be willing to cover the cost of the scan and record the garden being scanned. (Approximately 70 square metres.)On top of the circumstantial evidence regarding Jones living just 2 streets away from 3 of the murder victims below are a few more startling links.(1) Jones' own daughter has indicated that her father would leave her and her mother at home at the times of the killings and book into Rowton House, a doss house in Hammersmith whenever her parents would have a row. The daughter stated that she now believes her father would do this in fear that he may kill his wife in temper. Jones' own son-in-law stated that "There's no smoke without fire is there?"(2) Bridget O'Hara, the 8th victim was last seen leaving a pub near Rowton House on 11 January 1975 - Jones' birthday.(3) The person believed to be the killer had in 1964 shown one woman (a prostitute) a Metropolitan Police warrant card after she had got into his car. She stated that she felt very uncomfortable and made an excuse to get out of the vehicle. The driver gave her some cash before she got out. I believe the person was Harold Jones who was using the warrant card that had belonged to John Widdows, Jones father-in-law who had died just 2-3 years earlier. Widdows was a former London Metropolitan Police officer. Jones daughter stated that she still possessed her grandfather's retirement clock and Widdows may have possibly kept his warrant card when he retired.(4) At least 4 of the 8 murder victims were stored in a disused electricity sub-station on the Heron Trading Estate in East Acton. This was about 4 miles from Jones' rented property in Hammersmith. Jones daughter claims that her father worked in ACTON at the time of the murders but couldn't or wouldn't reveal which business premises he had worked at.(5) Jones left prison in 1941 after refusing treatment or discussing his crimes with the relevant authorities. The prison authorities noted that Jones, right to the day he was released showed no remorse for his crimes in Wales. Just shortly before his release the prison governor stated: "Sad as it seems, I can see no hopeful prospects for Jones in the future." The prison chaplain described Jones as "a no hoper." And then Jones was released onto an unsuspecting public possibly in the hope he would get killed in Libya where he served 5 years in the army.I am in contact with relatives of 6 of the 8 murder victims and they all (especially adult children of these women) are keen to know the identity of the killer in their lifetime. I am now 67 years old and I would like to know for sure the killer's identify in my lifetime.If anyone would like to come on board with this matter or have any practical suggestions I can be contacted at n.milkin@sky.com or 07989555376. Regards. Neil Milkins.

Neil Milkins ● 2227d2 Comments ● 2227d

The Rising Tide of Death on Our Streets

If you talk to anyone with day to day experience of dealing with young people in London today they will all tell you the same thing. The chances of a youth becoming involved in violent crime rises massively if there is no father figure in the household. No matter how loving and supportive a single mother is, she often can't impose the critical red lines on behaviour that enable boys to develop self-control. I'm not speaking with reference to the events last night in Ealing because we don't know any details. Also there are no studies to confirm what the professionals say because these days academic institutions shy away from research which is likely to generate controversy. However, we do know that there is a significant rise in fatherless boys occurring at the moment and this is coinciding with a sharp rise in knife crime. Unfortunately this is just the start of the rise and the problem is set to get worse if unchecked. The other issue is that the internet now allows rival gangs to communicate with each other and arrange confrontations — technology has made gang warfare more efficient. You can't put this genie back in the bottle. It also means that more police won't necessarily solve the problem. If fights can be arranged on encyrpted software even the best resourced force can't do anything about it. Tougher sentences are also demonstrably not going to work. We already lock up more people than any other country in western Europe and custodial sentences for minor offences just turns petty criminals into hardened ones. Higher tariffs for carrying knives has just resulted in gangs getting minors to bring knives to fights. The answer we may now have to look at is the fostering and adoption system. At the moment the presumption is in favour of the natural mother but huge resources will be ploughed into supporting her even though the outcome for the child is likely to be bad. If the bar was raised for when a mother would receive this support and more children were put up for adoption at an early stage we would see a reduction in crime in 15 years time.

Gordon Southwell ● 2233d12 Comments ● 2228d

Boris's Dilemma

After today's events I'm sure most people are as confused an uncertain about what is going on in UK politics as I am. Things are happening at such a pace it is difficult to keep track.  To make sense of it I thought it might be an idea to step back from the febrile atmosphere of news coverage of events and try and simplify what is going on. To start this it is probably best to accept from the outset that Boris Johnson has no guiding principles. That is meant as an observation rather than a criticism. Before opting to support Leave he laid out both sides of the argument and says he agonised over which to choose. That wasn't because he would have been persuaded by the strongest argument, he wanted to pick which would be best for his career. Boris has cultivated the party membership since he started in politics and, far more than any other Conservative politician has recognised that this is where true power lies within the party. Once he became leader it is now almost impossible to remove him as he will always have the backing of the membership. Getting close to the party rank and file has also made him well aware of their views and he was quick to realise they were unremittingly Eurosceptic. That they generally leaned that way was well known but he picked up quickly that since the referendum they had become obsessed with the issue beyond any other to the point that they would willingly compromise the economy or the Union to get Brexit. This meant that he knew any chance of him not becoming leader would be eliminated by him being the most unreservedly pro-Brexit candidate for leader. Right from the start he laid out his stall and effectively eliminated Dominic Raab who had previously outdone him for unbending Euroscepticism. However, this meant that he need to make pledges such as an unbreakable commitment to leave on 31 October. Having become leader he had to face the problem of his inadequate majority in the House which meant that any meaningful legislative programme was impractical even without Brexit. The normal solution would have been to call a general election but he faced the problem of another inadequate majority — that by which he holds Uxbridge and Hillingdon. If the Brexit party actively contests the seat and the Remain parties form an effective alliance he would probably lose. Therefore he needs to fight the election with some sort of pact with the Brexit party in place. The problem is that they are unlikely to stand aside unless he commits to a very hard Brexit as a campaign platform which his MPs may be unwilling to support. Assuming there is an election on 14 October cabinet would probably want him to say they would go for a negotiated deal without the backstop which the Brexit party say is not Brexit. This probably explains his confused and fairly pointless statement today. It would appear that the legislative challenge to 'no deal' Brexit is likely to work otherwise he wouldn't be threatening MPs with a loss of the whip. He now faces the choice of accepting an extension and missing the 31 October deadline or calling an election but he can't put no deal back on the table as a policy stance. However, an election would be an incredible roll of the dice. There are so many variables but the most likely outcome at this stage seems to be a Remain coalition with some chance that Boris may lose his seat. Of course a lot could happen in the meantime but Boris is essentially saddled with a policy stance that might appeal to his party's members but is unpalatable to the broader electorate. He probably recognises the chance of losing is high. On the other hand toughing it out as PM and reneging on his commitment to leave by 31 October even under duress may end his political career. Even he would have to consider resignation.  Neither of theses choices are particularly palatable for him but at least he has a dog now to give him some comfort.



Gordon Southwell ● 2255d45 Comments ● 2234d

Object by Friday 13th if you don't want 47 planes per Hour @ 2,000 feet flying directly over you.

If you haven’t already responded to Heathrow’s Consultation on a Third Runway, please send a short email message by this Friday 13 September 2019 to feedback@heathrowconsultation.com from your home postal address, saying for example a simple  “I am opposed to the expansion of Heathrow Airport “And adding one or more of the following that affect you:-It would bring many more planes over where I liveIt would bring many more planes over where I workThere would be aircraft noise overhead all the time, every dayI would be woken every morning by aircraft noise from 6amIt would cause increased pollution over the London areaThe air quality where I and my family live would be reduced from its present already poor levelI have asthma and the increased pollution caused by more aircraft would make it worseIt would cause the destruction of Harmondsworth and Longford villagesOver 750 homes would have to be demolished, and many more homes would become uninhabitable because of the noise and pollutionIt will alter the character of the whole of West London when the airport takes over all the land it says it needs for the third runway and associated airport useI will not be able to get on to the already overcrowded Piccadilly Line trains for my commute to and from workAny other comments you may wish to raise yourself and, of course, use your own wording and circumstances.And not to mention of course the drastic devaluation of your home if you're lucky enough to own one, after working hard all your life.Please note that The Department for Transport will take account of the actual number of responses, so it is important that we should all send our own response.   If you have neighbours or friends who share the same concerns, do please pass this message on to them ASAP..And then pat yourself on the back for getting off your backside and actually doing something - Strength In Numbers and all that folks!     :-)

Rosco White ● 2246d2 Comments ● 2246d

47 Planes a minute overhead, at 2,000 feet in Ealing/Acton! - Object NOW before 13 Sept:-

If you haven’t already responded to Heathrow’s Consultation on a Third Runway, please send a short email message by Friday 13 September 2019 to feedback@heathrowconsultation.com from your home postal address, saying for example a simple  “I am opposed to the expansion of Heathrow Airport “ And adding one or more of the following that affect you:-It would bring many more planes over where I liveIt would bring many more planes over where I workThere would be aircraft noise overhead all the time, every dayI would be woken every morning by aircraft noise from 6amIt would cause increased pollution over the London areaThe air quality where I and my family live would be reduced from its present already poor levelI have asthma and the increased pollution caused by more aircraft would make it worseIt would cause the destruction of Harmondsworth and Longford villagesOver 750 homes would have to be demolished, and many more homes would become uninhabitable because of the noise and pollutionIt will alter the character of the whole of West London when the airport takes over all the land it says it needs for the third runway and associated airport use I will not be able to get on to the already overcrowded Piccadilly Line trains for my commute to and from workAny other comments you may wish to raise yourself and, of course, use your own wording and circumstances.And not to mention of course the drastic devaluation of your home if you're lucky enough to own one, after working hard all your life.Please note that The Department for Transport will take account of the actual number of responses, so it is important that we should all send our own response.   If you have neighbours or friends who share the same concerns, do please pass this message on to them ASAP..And then pat yourself on the back for getting off your backside and actually doing something - Strength In Numbers folks!     :-)

Rosco White ● 2254d4 Comments ● 2253d

Volunteer at the Ealing Half Marathon 2019

Ealing Half Marathon still needs about 100 volunteers for this years event. You don’t have to be a runner to enjoy Ealing’s biggest event of the year. Last year, hundreds of volunteers got involved and had a great time making Ealing’s Half Marathon such a wonderful success for the runners and spectators alike resulting in the event winning the accolade of the Number One Best Half Marathon 2014, 2015 & 2016 at The Running Awards.This year we’ll be putting together an even bigger volunteer team of 700, looking after the race village in Lammas Park, and out on the roads of Ealing guiding the runners and helping local residents. It’s a fun & rewarding experience for all and we’d love you to get involved! You will need to be able to give between 4 to 6 hours on the day depending on where you are volunteering. The required start time for most volunteer areas will be 07:30am to allow for all the logistics on the day.As a thank you for creating such a great race we’ll provide you with a free breakfast roll, staff t-shirt and memento medal of the day for you to keep plus a FREE race place for 2020.There are a large number of roles available on race-day:Team LeadersTraffic co-ordinatorsRace marshalsWater station teamsBaggage & race village co-ordinatorsVolunteering is a great opportunity to feel part of the event and meet new like-minded people.You register at www.ealinghalfmarathon.com/volunteer

Sandra Courtney ● 2274d0 Comments ● 2274d

Age does weary us.

The young staff manning the recent Heathrow Airport Expansion Display on Ealing Common were surprised that although the Elizabeth Line had step free access to the trains the stations' forecourts at Ealing Broadway and West Ealing had no facility to pick-up and drop-off the disabled, those with luggage, pushchairs and the walking elderly. This is contrary to the British Standard for the design for station forecourts for access for the disabled.Only two Tube stations have step-free access in Ealing. One Acton town has a lift that cannot be used to drop off passengers illegally because LBE have a CCTV camera operating there. This generated fines for drivers who try to drop off passengers who have difficulty with stairs.Ealing's transport portfolio holder and senior officer assume that they might never get old like Peter Pan and need some help to be able to access our trains. I have written to Rt Hon Nusrat Ghani MP Accessibility Minister just  10 days ago complaining of this stupidity. The other body who might help are Transport for London who have a party in Dean Gardens this Saturday 20th July. The focus of this is to spend large amounts of dosh to improve the park but wasn't large amounts spent on it recently when it was out of action for 9 months. Perhaps they are Peter Pan-like too. Certainly they are like Nero hoping to feed cyclists to lorries and buses down the Uxbridge Road; another numptie idea.And all this electronic parking stuff ..all designed for the young. Now with libraries under threatPerhaps now is the time to up sticks and go to Torquay or Eastbourne. Clearly we aren't wanted in Ealing.

Arthur Breens ● 2301d47 Comments ● 2274d

Read with children!

Do you remember a character from a childhood book as fondly as an old friend?If you do, you’ll know the magic of being able to slip into another world as and when you need to, or how books can make your world a bigger, brighter place.For bookworms especially, it’s hard to believe that anyone could see reading as anything other than empowering, or even just a pleasure. For the third of children from disadvantaged areas who leave primary school without being able to read well, often it’s nothing but a chore.That’s why we like to turn up on the doorstep, with a backpack of books, two little stools, and a pair of volunteers who know that words take you places. Every week, come rain or shine, our volunteers bring the magic of reading directly into families’ homes every week, in low-income areas across London.Doorstep Library volunteers don’t just read stories; they do the silly voices, handpick the books, and give special recommendations. By making it fun first, we get to watch children transform into budding readers. We love when parents get stuck in with the sessions too and encourage them to get involved in their children’s education.Sometimes though, we’re just there to give a bit of extra support, whether we’re passing on info about a family activity, lending an ear, or even just being a friendly face. Then, before we go, we leave behind a selection of books for each child to borrow for the week.If this sounds like the role for you, these are the basics. We run projects on Monday, Tuesday and Thursday afternoons in estates across Westminster, Hammersmith and Fulham and Lambeth.In Hammersmith and Fulham, Monday and Tuesday projects start at 3.45pm and finish at 6.30pm, and Thursday projects start at 4.30pm and finishing at 7.00pm.If you'd like to know more contact Daniela Cardoso at volunteer@doorsteplibrary.org.uk

Daniela Cardoso ● 2295d16 Comments ● 2274d

ERECTILE DEVELOPMENTS COURTESY OF AN EALING COUNCIL CLIQUE

It seems that the few at the top of Ealing Council are intent on imposing on the many their vision of urbanizing "the queen of the suburbs", Ealing. his involves imposing high level erectile developments (by that I mean buildings, not the other kind) that would surely result in dysfunctional communities. The ruling Labour Party on Ealing Council has degenerated, posing as caring, but they are really concerned about total control and possession. The Council clique that are in control are the disingenuous few imposing this urbanizing vision on the many, pretending to care, but being officious and narcisstic at the expense of the many. Power corrupts.I write this because I have written to the Council, concerning two proposed erections in the vicinity of West Ealing Station. Below is the text of my email letter I sent to Council Leader Julian Bell and his colleague Peter Mason, the Council Lead on planning. Others were copied in, including local MPs, the local GLA member and community groups such as the Stop the Towers campaign group.HASTINGS ROAD AND MANOR ROAD DEVELOPMENTSAs you may know there are proposals to erect two high rise complexes. This includes one complex with a 25 storey block on the corner of Hastings Road and Drayton Green Road (proposed by A2Dominion) and another 26 storey complex on the corner of Manor Road with Drayton Green Road where Argyle Road begins (proposed by Southern Grove...). This site is known as 55west. They are diagonally opposite each other across the strategic railway line/CrossRail route with West Ealing station separating them.I write to you both in order to object to these developments. The Fire Brigade would have difficulty in fighting/extinguishing a fire at such high level developments. These proposed blocks are a fire liability, especially next to the CrossRail route.The existing Victorian and Edwardian architecture of the area should not be further compromised by a so-called contemporary twist of monolithic utilitarian Soviet Socialist style architecture. That already exists in the form of Sinclair and Dominion Houses, and Luminous City diagonally opposite it, across the rail line. The proposed architectural aesthetics are poor.There is a shortage of family housing, yet A2Dominion's proposal only has seven 3 bedroom homes (out of 183 flats), and the 55west site proposed development only has eight 3 bedroom homes (out of 150 flats). These overbearing and over dense fire liability tower blocks with little rabbit hutch flats would also seem to be there as a kind of “Council Tax yield farm” for privileged Council management nomenklatura. Will these proposals actually address the concerns of the homeless, including families within the L.B. of Ealing and reduce it's waiting list?As far as access and aesthetics are concerned, could not something more in keeping with the area be proposed? As an example, on Hastings Road, by the sharp bend on that road there is a "post war infill" block of flats - Hastings House, 42 flats on three storeys. It is certainly less of a fire hazard and is more accessible than the proposals from A2Dominion and Southern Grove. Lower rise and less dense housing developments would almost certainly be better appreciated by homeless families and their would be  neighbours. It would also reduce concerns about overlooking. These proposed erections would not address problems of car use. It would simply "kick the can down the road".It seems that the development proposals are put forward by people who are just blinkered by money and meeting targets for their own supposedly virtuous egos, like some officious status and power hungry driven Komissar in the Soviet Socialist empire of Hitler's one time mass murdering ally in the Kremlin.These proposed erections will surely set out a further precedent for the "slow rape" of "the Queen of the Suburbs", Ealing. It seems L.B. of Ealing Planning Department is fond of doing this. They have already inflicted this around North Acton/Gypsy Corner. They seem fond of using Ealing Borough residents' tax money to destroy/inflict environmental vandalism on the people of Ealing Borough.(END)THE COUNCIL SPENT 18 MONTHS IN SECRET PREPARING THESE PLANS, WITHOUT "CONSULTING" LOCAL EALING RESIDENTS. WHEN THE PLANS BECAME "RIPE" THEY "EXCRETED" THE PLANS OVER EALING RESIDENTS AS A "FAIT ACOMPLI". POWER REALLY DOES CORRUPT.

Anthony Hawran ● 2319d9 Comments ● 2313d