Forum Topics

Ealing Council to cut £89 million over four years

While it comes as a shock that Ealing Council is going to have to make cuts amounting to £89 million over the next four years I cannot but hope it will be somewhat more humane than during the last round of cuts that saw the closure of so many facilities for the sick and disabled, not to mention the bizarre attack on thr  borough library network that underpins the very fabric of Ealing.If cuts are to be made I would hope that a more humanistic approach, rather than a pride-driven approach is taken. I cannot see how Ealing can justify cutting a single care worker, however, I can think of several non-essential acitivities that could be pruned that are of somewhat lesser value than the effect that a single care worker on the well-being of needy people, for example:*To abolish the honorary and non-political or administrative office of the mayor of Ealing along with the deputy mayor, full time administrative staff, office space, and cars.*To abolish the Ealing Council Events Department, as however nice having free or subsidised entertainment may be it is not essential to the quality of life of people relying on welfare and care services.*To leave the appalling recycled plastic bottle Christmas Tree in storage and not put it up outside the Town Hall ever again saving on labour and admin and of course power.*To not put up unnecessary civic Chrismas decorations and to not proliferate these into new areas of the Borough saving on electricity and also reducing Ealing's carbon footprint for the electricity saved.*To rent out under say 20 year leases (as I am loathe to see beautiful historic civic buildings sold off) the old Town Hall and the so-called Pitxhanger Manor in Walpole Park (perhaps it could be to somebody like the YMCA who could provide much-needed temporary social accomodation).*To stop wasting time effort and money on ridiculous posturing like creating a virtual National Park of London.These are things that come to mind that would "save a care worker" from being cut if people are prioritised above political posturing.

Neil F. Weber ● 4163d45 Comments ● 4159d

October smile

An Irish MiracleMurphy drops some buttered toast on the kitchen floor and it lands butter-side-up.He looks down in astonishment, for he knows that it's a law of nature of the universethat buttered toast always falls butter-down.  So he rushes round to the presbytery to fetch Father Flanagan.  He tells the priest that a miracle has occurred in his kitchen.  But he won't say what it is, so he asks Fr. Flanagan to come and see it with his own eyes.He leads Fr. Flanagan into the kitchen and asks him what he sees on the floor."Well," says the priest, "it's pretty obvious. Someone has dropped some buttered toast on the floorand then, for some reason, they flipped it over so that the butter was on top.""No, Father, I dropped it and it landed like that!" exclaimed Murphy  "Oh my Lord," says Fr. Flanagan, "dropped toast never fallswith the butter side up. It's a miracle .Wait... it's not for me to say it's a miracle. I'll have to report this matterto the Bishop and he'll have to deal with it.He'll send some people round; to interview you, take photos, etc."A thorough investigation is conducted, not only by the archdiocesebut by scientists sent over from the Curia in Rome.No expense is spared. There is great excitement in the townas everyone knows that a miracle will bring in much need tourism revenue.Then, after 8 long weeks and with great fanfare, the Bishop announces the final ruling."It is certain that some kind of an extraordinary event took place in Murphy's kitchen,quite outside the natural laws of the universe. Yet the Holy See must be very cautiousbefore ruling a miracle.  All other explanations must be ruled out.  Unfortunately, in this case, it has been declared 'No Miracle' because they thinkthat Murphy may have buttered the toast on the wrong side!"

Graham Weeks ● 4197d32 Comments ● 4172d

Car Wash at TESCO at Gillette Corner

There was a thread on here recently about car valets. I posted on this about my reservations at using one off of South Ealing Rd and I think I mentioned the one at TESCO Osterely. Today I went against my better judgement and put the car in at TESCO Gillette Corner whilst I went to a meeting at SKY. So here I am issuing a WARNING to all to stay away from this place!!!!I returned after over 2 hours and was shocked at the state the outside of the car was left in. The "Main Man" came to me and said it wasn't finished and would be done in 2 or 3 minutes. Off I went to get a sandwich and 10 mind later returned to see the car still not done to a good standard and the bloke washing it starts arguing with me that these marks aren't down to him and won't come off. He slaps more polish on and what surprise with a little bit of effort we have an area of the car which is okay but the rest still naff. Then the killer....I noticed a huge scratch across the roof by the windscreen which was fresh and 1000% wasn't there before. Cue the "Main Man" returns and an almighty row kicks off with him accusing me of not wanting to pay. Apparently he's a professional and it's impossible to make these scratches with soap, water and a sponge. It didn't take long for the East European workforce to gather around giving me the folded arms and one eyed glare.It was only after I did one and insisted on paying for a crap job that it dawned on me.... The scratches where perfect arm length and would've been caused quite easily by a watch!!!!I'm still fuming but you've got no chance with these dogs so all I can do is warn as many people off as I can.DONT USE THE CAR WASH AT TESCO OSTERELY!!!!

Colin Goodman ● 4220d20 Comments ● 4190d

Gross family request - yellow ribbon removal

The official pages on Twitter and Facebook report that the Gross family would like the yellow ribbons to be removed - this is the text posted to the Facebook page yesterday:A message about Yellow Ribbons For Alice. The outpouring of love and support for Alice and her family since 28 August has been amazing. The yellow ribbons that have blanketed the area are enormously appreciated by the Gross family, and they have asked us to thank all the ribbon fairies on their behalf. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts. The sight of six thousand yellow ribbons worn by the runners, marshals and spectators at the Ealing Half Marathon was awe-inspiring. Each and every ribbon was made by hand with love, and we thank all concerned for their help and support. Thank you also to everyone, wherever you live, who has tied, worn or shared a real or virtual ribbon. Your support has brought comfort in these dark days, and you have done us all proud. Our yellow ribbons have been a symbol of all the best in our fantastic community. They have raised awareness of Alice’s disappearance and they have conveyed the hope of her safe return. For the last week they have served as a mark of respect following the heartbreaking news of her death. Now the time has come for us to take down the yellow ribbons. We and the family should be grateful if you could please help to take them down over this weekend. However, the ribbons, flowers and tributes at the Hanwell clock tower can remain for now. Thank you. On behalf of the Gross family the administrators of the Find Alice Gross Facebook group should like to thank each and every one of you for your continued, wonderful support. It means so very much to all of us.

Guy Edema ● 4198d0 Comments ● 4198d

The Chef's Protege - anyone seen it?

Is this programme the most damning indictment of the UK's education system ever? My wife and I just started watching this programme, catching up on episodes from the last month or so. For anyone who hasn't seen it, Michel Roux Jr, Theo Randall and Tom Kitchin go back to the catering colleges where they trained, to try to find a young protege to mentor. What they find has me totally astounded: -A 3rd year student (3rd year at catering college!) who cannot make scrambled eggs without a microwave. She has a long think about it, but after coming up blank, has to be instructed as how to make them in a pan, with which she then fails abysmally. -A 3rd year student who didn't know that olives had stones in them-A 2nd year student who didn't know to add oil to a pan to fry something, tried to dry fry mushrooms. -A student (I forget which, but 2nd/3rd year) who'd had a risotto once, when her Mum made it. -None of them had made pasta before, including a 2nd year who claimed never to have encountered Italian food. Now at the age of 18/19, I certainly wouldn't have claimed to be the best or most knowledgeable chef, but if I'd sent (& paid for) my kids to go to catering college I'd expect them to know these things within the first day/week, which makes me wonder what the hell do they do there? What DO they learn about? Anyone been to one, who could enlighten me? Or is it just the path of least resistance to get some sort of qualifications? What makes it worse is that the candidates put forward for the show were the colleges' most promising students supposedly!!

Philip Slater ● 4221d10 Comments ● 4217d

{press release} new protest group over draconioan Ealing Policy

Press Release distributed to various media outlets this week:- Local man refuses to have his kerb dropped until Ealing Council reviews their draconian policy on dropped kerbsMany people feel restrictions set by the Ealing Council on Driveway Crossover / Dropped Kerb is completely ridiculous.  Now they have set up a pressure group and are lobbying for change.Sometimes laws and regulations are hardly well thought out at all and seem to be created by politicians who are completely divorced from the real world.  According to a new pressure group recently launched in Ealing, that's exactly the case with the Ealing driveway crossover / dropped kerb restriction.  They've decided to take it to social media and the press and demand the restrictions are modified to something more sensible.1 man in particular Mohamed Alwakeel (the spokesperson for the new group) refuses to implement a dropped curb on his property for his driveway until such time as this draconian policy is reviewed through Public Consultation, rather than the closed committees that usually decide on this policy. Mohamed has good ground to believe that his rights under the European Convention on Human Rights under article article 8 have been infringed by the pointless Council Policy. Beurocrats will tell you the policy is related to pedestrian safety as well as the look of the street, yet ask any member of the public and they will tell you they have never heard of anyone being hurt due to the pavement being dropped.  Mohamed strongly believes this policy should be dictated by public consulatation not meetings behind closed doors. Mohamed's next door neighbour has a dropped curb over 5 metres, yet no one has ever complained about it, or been hurt by it. Currently the maximum allocation for a single dropped kerb is 2.4m and 1 per household, irrespective of other factors.  The pressure group would like to see this changed to the 4.8 metres which is what the council would seize on the public road in order for allocation of 1 parking bay, be it for parking permit or disability etc.  Anything less is quite ridiculous. There should not be 1 rule for the council paying public and 1 rule for council beurocrats who wish to seize land on the public road.  Brent, a neighboring council for example has a maximum allocation of 4.8 for dropped curb and will even consider granting 2 dropped curbs if your home is wide enough, this is a much more reasonable policy. The group plans on continuing to voice their opinion until a change comes in effect.For more information or to join visit https://www.facebook.com/ealingcrossover.

mohamed alwakeel ● 4223d50 Comments ● 4218d

e-petition to Ealing Council to take tougher action against public drinking and associated litter

Please could you sign and circulate to your family and friends this e-petition to Ealing Council to take tougher action against public drinking and associated littering and anti social behaviour in Greenford and Perivale.  To sign the petition please follow this link: http://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/ePetitions/tabid/96/ID/9/Consumption-of-alcohol-in-public-and-associated-littering-in-Greenford-and-Perivale.aspx The petition is open to be signed until 22nd September and states as follows: 'We the undersigned ask Ealing Council to actively campaign against public consumption of alcohol in Greenford and Perivale, to recognise the chronic increase in litter that public drinking is creating in the area from discarded beer cans, bottles, cigarette packets, plastic bags used to carry the drinking vessels and associated waste and the eyesore, public health hazard, including increased incidence of rats, and danger to wildlife that this litter creates in our streets, car parks, parks other public open spaces and private gardens. We ask the Council to recognise the unacceptable impact public drinking and associated antisocial behaviour from drunkenness is having on the lives of residents, including urinating and littering on private property and unwanted sexual advances to vulnerable residents. We ask the Council to act on these issues by: - launching a campaign with Council officers, Councillors and residents meeting public drinkers together with police officers, to increase the number and size of no street drinking signage;- creating an office in the Council specifically dedicated to cracking down on public drinking and enforcing the Controlled Drinking Zone; - increasing the numbers of litter bins in litter hotspots- sending letters to all households in the area informing residents that the Council is cracking down on public drinking;- working with the local police to ensure more is done to enforce the Controlled Drinking Zone and to reduce public drinking.'

Graham Weeks ● 4243d22 Comments ● 4219d

URGENT: Starlite Ballroom planning application

There is a revised planning application for the Starlite Ballroom, a venue that opened sixty years ago this year and hosted bands including the Who and Pink Floyd. Read more here: https://www.facebook.com/SaveTheStarliteGreenfordPlease help to save a precious asset for the whole borough by objecting to this application http://www.pam.ealing.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServletas soon as possible, mentioning some or all of the following points:- The Starlite Ballroom is an asset to the area, a UK music heritage site, the venue for some of the world's best known musicians, such as Jack Bruce, Eric Clapton, David Bowie and Jeff Beck.- It is the only large venue of its kind left in Greenford suitable for concerts, the stage at Greenford Hall is regarded as too high for that kind of event.- If restored it has the potential to stimulate regeneration in Greenford and the surrounding area, because its reopening would result in job creation and an increase in the general level of prosperity.- It has considerable potential for combined use as a combined community/arts centre and a commercial site, particularly because of its proximity to Sudbury Town Underground station. There is nothing of that kind in the area at the moment but there are successful examples of such projects such as Rich Mix London (http://www.richmix.org.uk/).- Residents have been asking for a local bus service connecting them with Ealing which would be justified and supported by the presence of the Starlite.- It is an unusual blend of pre-war and post-war Modernist architecture which reflects the changes in Greenford's architectural history. Its demolition would result in a loss of part of its local distinctiveness.- Having a prestige site like the Starlite on the doorstep on the doorstep is bound to lead to a rise in property values.- Its presence will stimulate local interest in heritage and attract tourist revenue, to the advantage of the borough as a whole. In January (16/1/2014, Vanessa Feltz Show, BBC 94.9) the Mayor of London said that there was potential for a music heritage trail through the borough - if there is nothing left to see there will be no point in creating it. Foreign tourists are already staying in the borough at hotels built in recent years.- If a block of flats replaces it there will be an increased concentration of residents needing more services, especially if they are bought to let and shared by multiple tenants, at a time when they are already stretched to breaking point.- It is highly likely that each new resident will own a car and as a result there could be a significant increase in the number of vehicles parked in the streets around it. Parking is already a problem there and fourteen off street spaces simply won't be enough. - Its use as a community centre would lead to an increase in pedestrian traffic, benefiting the small businesses around it.- New residents are more likely to do their regular weekly shopping at large supermarkets, rather than the small shops in its immediate vicinity.The whole of the borough of borough of Ealing has a tale to tell about the evolution of 20th century rock and blues, we already have events like The Hanwell Hootie and The Ealing Club has managed to retain its site at the Red Room in Ealing Broadway. If the council genuinely supports the preservation of local music heritage it must deny this planning application and support the Starlite.

Albertina McNeill ● 4260d3 Comments ● 4232d

IFTIKHAR FINALLY MADE A RACIST COMMENT

If you look at the context...it's racist.It's on the Brentford forum on the " gig is up " thread... his last post!"With out immigration, British society and economy would bleed to death. Britain is dying it natural death by aging population and low birth rate. Now the population would be replaced by Muslims.***    Did you forget how your white asses came on boats, robbed people of their wealth from colonies in East?   ***And killed and tortured them? Did you ´integrate´ then? You Britishers are-were nothing but thieves. Majority British population does not know its own history of crimes against humanity because your government there wants to regiment you with false propaganda and tell you bed time stories about your ´royalty´... who were, as I said, nothing but thieves. Whilst I agree that you have an immigration problem in this country, I don't think that this is your main problem. Your main problem is the disintegration of the family unit and the loveless binge drinking environment that your children are growing up in! NEVER in my life have I seen another country where people so seldom give their children a hug and a kiss like in this country and NEVER in my life have I seen another country where there are so many children from different fathers growing up in single parent households! Before you tackle the immigration problem (at least the immigrants LOVE their kids) you should first look at yourselves!"If I or anyone else would have used words like thieves, murderers and torturers... then referred to a specific skin colour there would be hell to pay would there not???If I had said that Muslims were brown arsed terrorists I'd be hung, drawn and quartered !!MODERATORS.... I WANT THIS MAN BANNED WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT !

Andy Wright ● 4265d13 Comments ● 4255d

Skip Hire Company Experience

I'm not recommending or warning... you can make your own mind up.I had a ring around for an 8 yard skip on LBE licensed skip hire companies.By far the cheapest was PINKLEAFI booked a skip on the Friday to arrive first drop on the following Tuesday (they said allow 48 hours to spin permit around)Booked my labour in to kick off Tuesday and they began digging.Chased PINKLEAF up at 10.00am as no sign of skip -- they confirmed "on it's way"At 11.00am another chase to PINKLEAF.. "the driver is just having his tacheometer break around the corner from you - be there in 15 mins"So at 1.30pm yet another call.. got the classic "wagon has broken down"... could only laugh!!!3.00pm just for devilment we rang again and said look we've now got 4 blokes standing idle... "be there in an hour, if not it'll arrive tomorrow morning"So onto Wednesday. Rang PINKLEAF at 9.00am to ask what time today because the lads are back on site and cant do anything else until rubble cleared..... "there's no permit for that skip yet, we only applied for it yesterday - do our best to get you a skip tomorrow"Thursday.. no skipFriday.. no skipSaturday.. no skipSunday.. no skip (but we went to church to pray for one)Monday - we chased again and same old tired excuses as week before.Then on the Tuesday, a whole week later than promised, PINKLEAF delivered a skip!!! But they were just teasing us... the driver refused to drop it as he wanted a cash payment.. even though we'd paid up front on a debit card (believe me if we hadn't we'd been off elsewhere!!!). Finally he spoke with the office and dropped the holy grail.So we used the skip for a week and a half and I asked last Friday morning for the skip to be collected ASAP..PINKLEAF confirmed they'd try and collect the next day but more likely Monday.. fine I said but please ensure Monday as I didnt want the collection experience to be the same as the delivery. "No problem" said PINKLEAF.So here I sit on Friday evening after ringing PINKLEAF this morning and giving them what for about having a skip still on the road a week after asking for it to be collected and guess what? I still have a skip from PINKLEAF on the road taking up a precious parking space and attracting daily attention from do as you likeys and potential fly tippers.Despite PINKLEAF assuring me there "no problem - definitely collected today" or, as I said to her, just trying to get me off the phone.So that's my experience of PINKLEAF skips... God how I wished I'd stuck with Gowing & Pursey who've given me excellent service over the years.I'm not endorsing any Company or telling you who not to use in LB of Ealing, I'm merely giving you factual tale of my experience.I've not hired a skip since LBE changed the permit regime to make it the hire companies responsibility to get the permit. I'm not happy as it takes something out of your control and once you've committed with a company to get your permit your basically stuck as I see it.I did tell PINKLEAF I'd get onto the Council about this but I'm not sure it'll count for anything. The monthly permit does however run out next week so I'm toying with the idea of blocking the skip in and then reporting it so a fine gets issued but I'm not that small minded -- I just want this skip off the road!!!!Enter joke of your choice about "rubbish service"

Colin Goodman ● 4266d9 Comments ● 4262d

Niqab

The Quran tells us that it is best to follow the Prophets Sunnah. So if the wives wore hijab/ niqab & they were the best of woman & the prophet pbuh had a beard which is the best man ever to live then why wouldn't u want to follow the best people? And if u believe in the Quran it tells u numerous times to follow the prophets Sunnah so it's your own personal choice whether to do it or not!!! Unfortunately some sisters don't present the hijab in the best way but there are many sisters out there that are trying there best to be modest in there dress & behaviour in this evil society we live in. If you are truly a Muslim sister you will support your sisters with the hijab and not state by wearing the hijab we are covering our religion & our character from the rest of the world. Because this statement is completely not true I can put a covering on my head but not on my character!! Unless your talking about the niqab? Which is the full face covering that yr talking about! But even though I don't wear niqab I still choose to support these sisters because this is a choice they've made and I don't feel that the niqab changes they're character but rather they're facial expressions while communicating!!Wearing a hijab for these women represents what it is...modesty. Any rejection or provocation comes from bigotry. It is exactly the same as the thought that a woman in a mini skirt who gets raped asked for it. The modest head-covering which you see on statues and pictures of Mary, and that Christian women wore for centuries, and many still do, particularly orders of religious sisters? The most ironic thing about this, is that, Mary the mother of Jesus is always portrayed wearing a hijab, and further, the Bible contains a command instructing believing women to "cover their head or shave off their hair! " The head covering the Jewish women were required to wear is different from the head covering Muslim women are required to wear. I think they symbolized different things maybe. Please look at it and tell me what the difference in level of covering between Virgin Mary's clothing and the hijab? In all three religions it symbolizes the same thing 1 obedience to God's commands 2 Modesty and respect to women.People are offended by people walking down the road in head to toe bin bags. It's spooky. You have the right to feel offended. You do not have the right to stop them doing it.It is socially acceptable to be openly racist towards Muslims in this country. Legally not so because more and more Muslims are standing up to this fascism and rightfully so. What, values like stripping down to get sunburned on the beach and drinking to excess on a Friday night out? Why don't you just wear what you want and allow other people to wear what they want? The right to wear what you want is not a special privilege. Its a basic democratic right and one that you yourself enjoy. No one tells you what you can or cannot wear. Why do you think you can tell others what they should wear?These racist just don't like being pointed out and don't like to be exposed when challenged! So all in all, this university wanted to make a rule for less than 1% of the population who (I assume) aren't causing any big disturbances or anything? In regard of safety/terror issues, I'd be more worried about backpacks, but I doubt those will be banned in an university setting. Ban on Burqa/ Niqab is against religious-***-human rights of Muslim Women in Europe. Those who support ban on veil are Islamophobic.We live in a world were women are paid to be naked and fined to be covered, unbelievable! Sisters if you want to wear the niqab you do that. Inshallah you are rewarded for your efforts and commitment in the hereafter. A woman should be free to wear what she likes, if you going to ban a woman for covering up herself, please also ban woman that fail to cover up. The only people who will suffer are Muslim women. A ban would be unjust. One of the best things about this country is its tolerance. Let us remain tolerant.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4274d6 Comments ● 4273d

Halal Meat

Halal Meat Muslims say a prayer before they kill an animal. Christians say a prayer before they eat it. I'm not sure why either of these practices should be thought particularly offensive. How on earth does eating a piece of meat or poultry that has been slaughtered with a prayer equate to accepting or supporting a religious practice? Why are you so threatened if a person has said a couple of words in Arabic beforehand? With so much crap going on in the world it's ridiculous (and frankly embarrassing) that this is something of major concern to the extent that it is creating so many headlines. Granted, people should be told if they are eating halal meat, but the vitriolic responses are becoming increasingly disturbing. This is not about food standards, it is not about 'defending' a secular society, it is not about labelling or consumer rights or animal welfare. This is about the fact that some people just don't like Muslims.Slaughterhouses are businesses, they also have "the right to choose" to conduct and practice their business in whichever way they wish in order to maximise their customer base. Pizza Express and other restaurants also have "the right to choose" what their menu consists of, again in order to maximise their customer base. Both halal-compliant slaughterhouses and Pizza Express are doing just that, nothing sinister or malicious or untoward. You have the right as the consumer to choose what you buy/eat, sure, which is why it's important that products are labelled well and that, say, places which use halal meat say that they do. Which Pizza Express was doing anyway. This wasn't a secret, the company are pretty clear about it on their website and if this matters so much to you then surely in order to exercise your "right to choose" as a consumer and decide whether/not to eat there you have to actually go and do some research? If you want to be an engaged consumer you have to actually be an engaged consumer, you can't expect everybody to do it for you, you have to ask. When you buy a chocolate bar, do you expect somebody to rush up to you and say 'BY THE WAY THAT CONTAINS NUTS~!' or do you read the packaging?This is a story about lazy people who couldn't be bothered to act like engaged consumers and are horrified to find out that they were 'unwittingly' being given something they never asked not to be given in the first place. That is all it is.You guys can eat anything even pigs that roll in their own filth but you wont eat HALAL which is clean meat.  You know, the bible also says you shouldn't eat pork as it is 'unclean'.....just saying for all of you stating this is a christian country. Bit of course it's nothing to do with the meat, it's just another excuse to have a pop at Muslims isn't it. I for one am proud to live in a multicultural society and am glad that my child is growing up in one. I would hate for her to grow up as a little Englander with a hateful, narrow view of the world and frightened of anything even remotely different to her. Pork is banned in the christian religion. Read the bible and find out. Stop this vendetta against Halal meat......how many will get an Asian / Indian halal curry after a night Boozing! And as usual I bet the Muslim parents wouldn't have an issue with pork etc as long it was served n cooked separately to the Halal food which would also apply if catering for vegetarians and non vegetarians!! British Muslims have every right to be catered for. They are as British as the rest. I think people are worried in case the ritual prayers are in fact spells which will turn them all into Muslims. This week's row has got nothing all to do with animal welfare. The fuss is about people's fears over the covert Islamification of society. You may or may not agree that concerns are realistic or even legitimate, but food suppliers and others concerned ought not to deny that it is an issue or answer criticisms honestly. I don't think eating halal meat actually turns you into a Muslim. This time it is aimed at Muslims. However assaults on ritual slaughter have a long history in terms of European anti-Semitism. This is just more of the same, prejudice dressed up as concern for animal welfare. Taking lives, foods and shelters of others are cruelty, so, don't take meat, fish and vegetables  for food because they have lives. Don't milk animals because they are their babies food. Don't take drinks because they are the abodes of so many living creatures. Don't let mothers do breast-feeding because it harms their beauty.....Just be the champion of saints of mankind! "  - Do this words sounds funny? Hope, don't for those champions who are the modern advocates of "RIGHTS". Stunning is unethical. Stunning causes the animal SO much pain. Halal is HUMANE and CARING to the animal. Denmark is a country that SUPPORTS animal cruelty. Science has shown the Halal is peaceful. Science has shown that stunning causes animals PAIN and SUFFERING. Centuries ago people were more natural. Stop perverted GMO and perverted food practices. Islam is the best way of life.Birmingham school says sorry for serving non-Halal meat to Muslim pupils. Council catering staff had wrongly dished up the non-Halal food to Muslim pupils on December 12, but details have only just come to light. On Monday parents received a letter from Craig Jansen, head of the 1,400-pupil secondary school and sixth form, in which he apologised unreservedly for the incident. There are hundreds  of state and church schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies so that non-Muslim children could enjoy their own meals in their own schools. IA London School of Islamics Trust    

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4345d47 Comments ● 4303d

It's Recycling Week but Reusing is Better....so here's some info:

http://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/200970/recycling_services/1611/re-use_collection_service"Re-use collection serviceFind a new home for your unwanted but good condition furniture and appliances with our reuse service for bulky items.Working in partnership with London Re-use Network we can collect items from your home to be passed on to vulnerable families.The items must be in good, clean condition and have the appropriate fire safety labels attached. The London Re-use Network will not accept broken, stained, ripped or torn items.Items which can be collected include:  BedsSofasFridgesWashing machinesTablesChairsComputersTelevisionsBicyclesHow to book a collectionOnline: www.londonreuse.comPhone: The London Re-use Network hotline on 0203 142 8506 (9am-5pm)The items will be collected from inside your property to keep them in good condition for re-use and to prevent damage by the weather or animals. Please ensure items are clean, have user manuals where possible, have safety labels attached, and have all pieces and parts.Collections cost £20 for 1-8 items, and £25 per fridge or freezer.Please check our full list of items which can be collected for more information.If you have large items to be collected that are not suitable for re-use you can use the bulky waste collection service."Don't forget the Charity Shops, and www.westlondonwaste.gov.uk  Some charities may collect free.Friends in North London shared a collection.  Why not see if you can do this if you do not have a full quota as per the description - bulky waste can be by the black bin liner full - check out bulky waste collection info.

Philippa Bond ● 4309d2 Comments ● 4309d

Trojan Horse

Trojan Horse Tahir Alam is allegedly the man behind a blueprint for the ‘Trojan Horse’ plot for the radical ‘Islamisation’ of secular state schools. An alleged plot to takeover some of Britain’s schools by Islamist extremists has been reportedly masterminded by a ringleader who had drafted a guide document on the process, a media report has said. Tahir Alam, chairman of governors at Park View school in Birmingham, is allegedly the man behind a blueprint for the so-called “Trojan Horse” plot for the radical “Islamisation” of secular state schools. He called for “girls [to] be covered except for their hands and faces”, advocated gender segregation in some school activities, and attacked a “multicultural approach” to collective worship, the Sunday Telegraph' reported. In his 72-page document, published by the Muslim Council of Britain in 2007, Tahir Alam and co-author Muhammad Abdul Bari categorically attacked many state schools for not being “receptive of legitimate and reasonable requests made by some Muslim parents and pupils in relation to their faith-based aspirations and concerns”. They described how Muslim governors could be activated to press the “views and aspirations of Muslim parents and the local community” on reluctant schools. Birmingham has a large Muslim population, nearly 22 per cent, according to the 2011 census. The “Trojan Horse” plot had come to light recently and involves the alleged takeover of secular state schools and the removal of secular head teachers in Birmingham by radical Muslim staff and governors. There are more Methodist schools than Muslim schools in England and 33% of English state schools are Christian. There’s been a big kerfuffle over a supposed Muslim influence on six schools in Birmingham, with outlets like the BBC and Telegraph alleging a “Trojan horse” takeover by Muslim parents. But whether you agree with religion in schools or not, the faith that is most clearly represented in Britain’s education system is Christianity. There are more Methodist schools (26 or 0.13%) than Muslim schools in England. Out of the total number of state-funded schools (primary and secondary) in England this is what percentage were Muslim in 2012. Some 0.06% or 12 schools are Muslim faith schools.  Out of all UK state-funded schools, 33.61% or 6751 schools are Christian. School segregation: 12% of state schools are split into boys and girls. Charges against the six schools in Birmingham include not teaching the curriculum, inviting radical speakers to talk to the children and gender segregating classrooms – to the detriment of girls. A small, but significant number of traditional British schools are split by gender too. The man accused of being at the centre of the plot, Faisal Khan, has denied the allegations, saying his sole motive was to improve the standards at schools and that he had no wish to “Islamize” British schools. British authorities are now investigating the alleged plot. UK Education Secretary Michael Gove appointed Peter Clarke, former head of Scotland Yard’s Counter Terrorism Command, to lead the probe. The appointment of Clarke has faced criticism, with critics saying the move has resulted in rising fears over a possible government crackdown on Muslim communities in the UK. There are concerns that the plan could prevent ordinary Muslims from getting involved in their children’s schooling affairs for fear of being branded extremist. “The idea that MCB document was a Communist or Trotskyite-type plot to takeover all Birmingham/UK schools is laughable. This feeds into a wider 'counter-jihadist' (Breivik, EDL, etc) narrative that Muslims want to "take over". To describe the handbook as 'a document on manipulating teachers and curriculum' or 'a detailed blueprint for the radical "Islamisation" of secular state schools', as Sunday Telegraph says, is an insult to the many thousands of professionals and lay people who have been involved over the last ten years in the massive improvements in the educational achievement of young Muslim people. There is a level of hysteria building which is not justified, we need to take the temperature down and politicians must not play with these issues or else face a potential backlash, possibly in community cohesion." Abdul BariThe whole saga is outrageous, beyond belief and frankly if it was not so serious, it would be comical. The documents on which this whole action is perused is false and as there is no proof of extremism in schools, Mr Gove has made it illegal for Muslims to have conservative views (coming from a minister of conservative government, its comical really). Feel like we are back in the fifties in the USA again. Michael Gove is an avowed Zionist which is not the best way to approach issues like this! Because it can lead greater attacks on Islam. It amazes me that on the basis of an anonymous letter the whole country has been lead to believe that there is an organised plot to somehow take over schools, now allegedly across the length and breadth of Britain! Furthermore the amount of coverage that this has received from the media as being a credible story, to me, suggests the level of Islamophobia in our society has reached alarming and dangerous heights. I would suggest that for the sake of fairness, equality and justice all schools are subject to the same level of scrutiny. For example Christian, C-of-E, Jewish and Hindu, Sikh schools. I believe that this not only a witch hunt but a move to tarnish and undermine the credibility of Muslims in general and the noble teachings of a widely practiced and rapidly growing religion which a people devotedly choose to follow. Islamophobia should be stopped - especially when the racist is a government minister or department. you must share this island with many people, why does it belong to one people? Grammar schools regularly carry out gender segregation, shall we remove those Head teachers too.  The horse in question, it is alleged, contained Muslim extremism – brought to state schools by stealth, by governor bodies launching subtle pincer movements, to remove the kind of pesky teachers who might object to the segregation of pupils by sex, or a refusal to stick to the syllabus. How incredibly extremist. Schools where segregation of pupils by sex occur. How different from boy's only Grammar schools and High schools for Girls that exist in predominately Conservative areas. And that exist predominately in the private school sector. It does though surely produce better exam results, as pupils are less influenced by the idea of 'girl's subjects' and 'boy's subjects', and are less likely to be distracted by sex. Allegations of an Islamic takeover plot of Birmingham schools are just the latest in a string of slurs against Muslims. It is not clear what is meant by an "Islamic plot takeover", and whether that is the same thing as saying or hinting that some Muslims might want to get some schools to adopt their particular version of Islamic religious values, behaviours and life-styles. If it is the latter, that would not necessarily be an indication of "terrorism", so I struggle to see the need for 'counter-terrorism' input. It is not terrorism in any way shape or form. It is important to remember this is not about Islam as such but yet another chance to bash people perceived as foreigners. To many Muslim is another word for immigrant and coloured person, two terrible bugbears. Why should an unnamed, undated, unspecific source has effected students, teachers, governors, parents in one swoop. It has serious implications on unfounded accusations for hundreds of people. In no way shape or form is this right, nor should have it EVER happened. Just by a anonymous letter how can you judge the schools and it is bringing such bad vibe to Birmingham schools and local Muslim community we feel like we're targets no matter how hard we try we will never please and move forward from the terrorist labelling. I am disgusted at the way these particular schools and governors were targeted for no reason other than being Muslim. No solid evidence wa available to substantiate these accusations which arose and yet such great weight and focus was attached to them. Morally unjust and utterly unacceptable. The Trojan Horse document was clearly written by someone who knows little about Birmingham and even less about Islam. It has chimed, however, with widespread Islamophobic fantasies and fears amongst non-Muslims, and as a result of unethical reporting in the media has done much damage. On the one hand we get told we are not integrating enough and we should engage more in civic society. On the other, when we do, we get accused of having sinister agendas. Since when do concerns by religiously conservative parents about teaching on homosexuality, girls and boys mixing, and the reciting of prayers, require anti-terrorist experts to get involved? Allegations of an Islamic takeover plot in Birmingham schools aren't justified by the evidence – and the government response is way out of proportion. Perhaps its best to let the Muslim community sort these issues out. These are in effect Muslim schools now. It is up to the Muslim community to see off hard liners (if there are any) otherwise it is their own children's' education that will suffer. I think it would be very difficult for non Muslims to get involved either as governors or management so perhaps that it is one of the reasons for the conflicts that have arisen. It may be best for the Government to but out providing the record of the school is O.K. from an exam point of view. I am so disgusted that even after it was proved there is no factual evidence or basis for that racist and hate filled document, schools in Birmingham are being subjected to this horrific ordeal and the name of many good reputable teachers is being tarnished... Why? Clearly viewable that this accusation has been purposely placed on these schools which surprisingly consists of majority Muslim children. Clearly the school policies are being contradicted by Mr Gove as they clearly state that it is the schools priority and job to meet the needs of the local community and of the students within the school. So if a school is doing that then what is the issue? What is happening feels like the persecution of a religious group. This is important because the wit hunt feeds Islamophobia. As we can see from the bombings and arson attacks on mosques in the UK, Islamophobia is a very dangerous and divisive form of racism. I'm sick of this hatred of Islam and Muslims. Haters, ignorant scum, look for any means to target Muslims, now even in our schools. It's a joke and this has to stop. How hypocritical does a country have to be to illegally invade Muslim countries and then accuse Muslims of terrorism? I am a Muslim. I am an anti-terrorist.   I never realised how racist and anti-Islamic this country is until I moved here. These people are here legally and have the right to live how they want to. Just because there are terrorists who use Islam as a doctrine to justify their hateful acts, does NOT mean that every Islam wants to change Britain to Sharia Law, kill the gays and put all women in burkas! These people are being judged and punished for the actions of others that have nothing to do with them, simply because they are of the same religion. Do you judge Germans in the same way because their country committed genocide? Or the Irish if they are from an area where religious conflict was particularly violent? No. Seems like thinly veiled racism to me, not the 'staunch upholding of British rights against religious extremists' as you all seem to espouse. What do people mean when they talk about 'multiculturalism'? If a lot of people come from a foreign country and settle in a particular area they will bring the culture of that country with them. Of course they will want their schools to promote their values. Gender segregation is everywhere in the Muslim world including in EU applicant, Turkey, so either we believe in Britain as multicultural or we don't. You don't get to pick and choose the bits you want. Why not sit down with parents and listen to their concerns, instead of ordering an investigation? Shocked at this terrifying witch hunt against Muslims who are simply trying to raise standards. Its totally unacceptable to create a furore in the country over anonymous accusations with no proof. Because it is a divisive move and will affect community relations. This is the very reason why society does not function properly, this is a deliberate attempt to spread fear amongst communities, as the best way to control a nation is through fear itself. because this is NOT ,,I repeat is NOT an Islamic plot to take over Birmingham, so DO NOT put false information in the media to put Muslims down!!!!! What next.....Muslims taking over hospitals, banks, pubs....come on... Tomorrow, a Pakistani MP would become the PM of GB and this does not mean that the country has become a colony of Pakistan.  What's taking place is an absolute disgrace. This whole witch hunt is putting Muslims off from becoming governors at a time when it is need the most. Why should Muslim parents be targeted when all they want at the end of the day is a good all round education for their children. Before Muslims governors came on to the scene all the inner city schools were doing poorly and failing all the children of the school. Muslim parents were criticised for their lack of involvement in their children's schools. Now they are being vilified. It is an absolute disgrace that an ex anti terrorist police office has been brought in to investigate the situation. It stinks of racism and the desire to label all Muslims into the category of extremist and jihadist. What a disgrace by the national and the local government. It's wrong for Gove to be deliberately politicising our Education system. All our children deserve respect and not to be scapegoated. What a total waste of tax payers money and tactical manoeuvre by Michael Gove to divert attention away from the real issues. Gove’s war is designed to destabilise governing bodies where Muslims form a majority. Don't want us to be part of 'big society'?  We totally reject the idea that there is Muslim plot to take over Birmingham schools. We abhor the scapegoating of the Muslim community being whipped up by the media. We call for the removal of Peter Clarke as we believe this is a provocative appointment, designed to divide our community. I don't believe that there is an Islamic Plot to take over Birmingham schools. It's a set-up. Anonymous complaints have been used in the past to hound good head teachers of community schools out of their jobs in order to facilitate the creation of academies. This whole story smells of falsification and corruption. I suspect that the people wishing to take over schools are not Islamic extremists, but Academy Chains with business interests. A shamefully irresponsible and sensationalised inquiry whose adverse impact on community relations locally and nationally will sadly be lingering long and far. If British authorities are so concerned about their education institutions being infiltrated by ``extremists'' then I suggest they stop Tony Blair, architect in chief of the illegal and violent 2003 Iraq invasion from speaking at colleges and universities across the UK and the world. His lies and fabrications caused the deaths, directly and indirectly, of thousands of Iraqis, British and Americans. While the survivors of his wars suffer in silence, this former British Prime Minister makes millions through his speaking engagements at educational institutions across the world with little or no sign of remorse for the suffering he caused. Nothing I see in the above articles suggests the British Muslim educators in question did anything illegal, let alone anywhere as remotely destructive as the twice elected British Prime Minister. Britain's interests would be served better if they questioned their own domestic and overseas policies instead of perennially whining on about ``extremist'' from their (mostly) law abiding immigrant communities. There are a total of 21300 Primary and 3900 Secondary schools in the UK. Finding that 6 out of these 25200 had board members who wanted to push their extremist views over the governance of those school is not a Islamic Plot or Trojan Horse to Islamises UK. This is a massive overreaction and the Islamophobia on display in the comments is more terrifying than the actual case itself. Stop the racist witch hunt in Birmingham schools. We Muslims have a right to our religion. I decry everything which denigrates Muslims in this country. The media and governmental attitudes and actions, inflame prejudice and ignorance. We want the best for our children and such baseless witch hunt of school governors does not help the cause of better education. Stop this hate against Muslims. It is not them who are terrorists , but all those who imply they are with the help of media you try bringing others to your side giving false details - twin towers wasn't Muslim either - that was the Americans - you will not win as Islam Will forever grow and prove it is peaceful through the will of God (Allah SWT)... amen. This is undermining confidence in the Muslim community and increasing Islamophobia. This is another example of the media whipping up hysteria against the UK Muslim community.  The way our Govt treating British Muslims is as if all Muslims are terrorists unless they prove otherwise. Govt should focus on its job. Governors of this school worked hard to help a failing school achieve outstanding rating from Ofsted. Please fix Ofsted and stop demonising Muslims. Nick Clegg on LBC radio indicated that the DFE is full of right wing ideologues and extremist loons. Islamic schools protect Muslim children from the onslaught of Euro centrism, homosexuality, racism, and secular traditions. All education systems appear to be indoctrination systems. I went to a good private school. Guess how we were 'encouraged' to think about politics! Having a Muslim name in UK is a crime. All UK job application forms have sections ask your race and religions. Most UK employers simply reject your applications just by looking at this section. Native Brits must learn to respect and tolerate those who are different. The needs and demands of the Muslim community are different from those of natives. Muslims are in Britain not to give up their cultural heritage. They must integrate in their new home country, learn new languages and apply for political representation -- without forgetting their cultural heritage. It is important to learn Standard English, but their  languages should not be neglected. They need Masajid and grave yards. Muslim children not only need halal meat or Eid Holidays but they need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their development period also. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. The whole world belongs to Muslims. He/she must learn and be well versed in Standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. At the same time, he/she must learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural heritage and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. For a Muslim English is an economic language and Arabic is a religious while Urdu and other community languages are their social and emotional languages.Muslim children not only need halal meat or Eid Holidays but they need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their development period also. There are hundreds of state primary and secondary schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion all such schools may be opted out to become Muslim Academies. This means the Muslim children will get a decent education. Muslim schools turned out balanced citizens, more tolerant of others and less likely to succumb to criminality or extremism. Muslim schools give young people confidence in who they are and an understanding of Islamic teaching of tolerance and respect which prepares them for a positive and fulfilling role in society. Muslim schools are attractive to Muslim parents because they have better discipline and teaching Islamic values. Children like discipline, structure and boundaries. Bilingual Muslim children need Bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods, who understand their needs and demands. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. Legally, the state has an obligation to respect the rights of parents to ensure that 'education and teaching(of their children) is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.' The schools must satisfy the spiritual, moral, social, and cultural needs of Muslim pupils. State schools with non-Muslim monolingual teachers are not in a position to satisfy their needs. A good school is not just a knowledge factory or a conveyor belt for churning out exam passes - it is a community, a family. A community is held together by common values and principles.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4316d14 Comments ● 4309d

Exam Factories

Almost all children now believe they go to school to pass exams. The idea that they may be there for an education is irrelevant. Leading companies are struggling to recruit teenagers with basic skills because schools have been turned into “exam factories”, business leaders have warned. Many employers had been left “disheartened and downright frustrated” by poor levels of literacy, numeracy, communication and timekeeping among school leavers and graduates. Overemphasis on sitting exams and hitting targets throughout compulsory education had robbed children of the chance to develop the “soft” skills needed in the work place. Business leaders believed the emphasis on passing exams at school meant children failed to develop other skills, including the ability to hold a conversation, display good work ethic, turn upon time and apply basic literacy and numeracy. State, independent and faith schools have become exam factories and are only interested in A to C Grades. They do not educate children. The result is that anti-social behaviour, gun and knife culture, racism, drug addiction. binge drinking, high rate of teenage pregnancies and abortions, high divorce rate are common in society. Exam results do not reflect a candidate’s innate ability. Employers have moaned for years that too many employees cannot read or write properly. According to a survey, school-leavers and even graduates lack basic literacy and numeracy skills. More and more companies are having to provide remedial training to new staff, who can’t write clear instructions, do simple maths, or solve problems. Both graduates and school-leavers were also criticised for their sloppy time-keeping, ignorance of basic customer service and lack of self-discipline. Even Muslim schools have also become Exam Factories, only interested in A to C grades just like state schools. There is a positive co-relation between faith, culture and language. Faith needs culture and languages to flourish. According to a research, children who study the language and culture of their parents may achieve more and become more involved citizens. Migrant Muslims speak variety of languages. State schools as well as Muslim schools give lip service to the community languages but majority of Muslim schools completely ignore or discourage community languages. The ex- chairman of the Association of Muslim Schools Mr.Idrees Mears, a native revert totally rejects the teaching of Urdu and other languages. The same opinion was expressed by the head of state funded Islamia School as well as by the ex- Chairman of the Nida Trust. They are not in a position to understand the needs and demands of the bilingual children because they are themselves monolinguals. It is a well known fact that social and emotional education comes with one’s own language, literature and poetry. Pakistani children suffer more than other children. They speak different languages at home and when they go to the Masajid they are exposed to Urdu and Arabic. At schools they are exposed to English and at the age of 11 are exposed to European languages. Now European languages are introduced at Primary level, but Urdu is totally ignored and discouraged by the state as well as by the Muslim schools. English, Arabic and Urdu must be introduced at nursery level so that the children can grow up with three languages. We have already lost three generation and the fourth one is in the process of losing its linguistic and cultural identity by not learning Urdu. The Muslim community is suffering because of social and cultural problems of high rate of divorce, run away young girls, low academic achievements, drug addiction, drinking, teenage pregnancies, disrespect for their parents and elders, forced marriages and honour killings. It is all because our youth are cut off from their cultural roots and languages. I blame state schools because they have never been serious in the teaching of Urdu, Arabic and other community languages.   An American research reveals in 2005 that bilingual learners with no education in their first language take longer to learn English and a bilingual learner with a good education in their own language do best of all. Muslim schools are committing the same mistake by ignoring community languages. Even OFSTED is not serious about the importance of bilingualism and bilingual education. Their priority is the teaching of English language. Nobody is denying the importance of English as an economic language but equally important is the first languages of the children for social and emotional literacy. The Muslim community has been passing through a phase of fourth Crusades. The battleground is the field of education, where the young generation will be educated properly with the Holly Quran in one hand and Sciences in other hand to serve the British society and the world at large. A true Muslim is a citizen of the world, which has become a small global village. We are going to prepare our youth to achieve that objective in the long run. A true Muslim believes in Prophet Moses and the Prophet Jesus and without them one cannot be a Muslim. My suggestion is that in all state, independent and Christian based school special attention should be given to the teaching of Comparative Religion and Islam should be taught by qualified Muslim Teachers to make the children aware the closeness of Islam to Christianity and Judaism which will help them to think about Islam, as “A Pragmatic and Modern Way of Life,” during their life time. British schooling and the British society is the home of institutional racism. The result is that Muslim children are unable to develop self-confidence and self-esteem, therefore, majority of them leave schools with low grades. Racism is deeply rooted in British society. Every native child is born with a gene or virus of racism, therefore, no law could change the attitudes of racism towards those who are different. It is not only the common man, even member of the royal family is involved in racism. The father of a Pakistani office cadet who was called a "***" by Prince Harry has profoundly condemned his actions. He had felt proud when he met the Queen and the Prince of Wales at his son's passing out parade at Sandhurst in 2006 but now felt upset after learning about the Prince's comments. Queen Victoria invited an Imam from India to teach her Urdu language. He was highly respected by the Queen but other members of the royal family had no respect for him. He was forced to go back to India. His portrait is still in one of the royal places. Children should be taught about the contribution Muslims have made to civilisation in order to combat threats of extremism and discrimination. It will help native children to develop positive attitudes towards Muslims. It will bring divided communities closer together, by teaching children about debt west owe to Muslims - coffee and pinhole camera to the three - course dinner and advancement in maths. The teaching will bring together science, history, RE, citizenship and community cohesion - some of the most pressing problems for the minister responsible for the curriculum. One of the major reasons for the alienation of British Muslims is a lack of clear identity. It is crucial for the British society to understand the hugely positive impact that Islamic inventors have had upon the world, and for Muslims to take pride in it. At present there is a widespread mis-conception among many people worldwide that the state of science and technology during the period known as "The Dark Ages" was that of stagnation and decline. The Muslim civilisation flourished and contributed to thousands of essential inventions that still affect western life style. The open recognition of the contribution of the Muslims should be reflected in the National Curriculum. The mainstream history of scientific ideas has failed to acknowledge numerous Islamic scientists and their great efforts and achievements throughout the centuries. A report by the Institute for Community Cohesion found that native parents were deserting some schools after finding their children outnumbered by pupils from ethnic minorities. Schools in parts of England are becoming increasingly segregated. The study focused on 13 local authorities. Many of the schools and colleges are segregated and this was generally worsening over recent years. This is RACISM because British society is the home of institutional racism. My statement regarding Muslim schools where there is no place for non-Muslim child or a teacher is based on educational process and not on racism. Muslim children need Muslim teachers during their developmental periods. For higher studies and research, Muslim teacher is not a priority. I have been campaigning for Muslim schools since early 70s because there is no place for foreign cultures, languages and faiths in state schools. Muslim children are victim of racial abuse and discrimination. Neither Muslim community nor the DFE paid any attention to my proposal. Muslim community kept on setting up Masajid for worshiping and for the education of their children. Masajid help Muslim children to recite the Holy Quran without understanding and teach them how to perform their prayers. DFE introduced Multicultural education for the integration and assimilation of the Muslims. I regard Muslim schools not just Faith schools but more or less bilingual schools. I set up the first Muslim school in Forest Gate London in 1981. Special attention was given to Standard English, Arabic and Urdu languages along with National Curriculum. But due to its closure, it could not become a model school for others to follow. Islamia School, founded by Yusuf Islam became the model school where there is no place for the teaching of Urdu and other community languages and only Arabic is taught. The sound knowledge of one’s owns language would appear to help – not hinder the acquisition of a second language and bilingual children may even have cognitive advantages and that the ability to speak more than one language is going to be increasingly important for the world of the future. Therefore, Muslim children and young Muslims have potentially a major educational advantage, although sadly this is not being developed well at present. British policy makers now recognise bilingualism as an educational asset rather than a problem. Education plays a central role in the transmission of languages from one generation to the next. The teaching of mother tongues is essential in terms of culture and identity. Arabic is a religious language for the Muslims but for Pakistanis, Urdu is also essential for culture and identity. Blind Muslim children in Bradford are learning to read Arabic and Urdu Braille, by a blind teacher who travelled from Pakistan. Now blind Muslim children are not going to miss out on culture, religion, language and the social aspects and integration into their own community and identity. Majority of Muslim children are from Pakistan, Bangladesh and India They need to learn Arabic and Urdu to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. Urdu is a lingua frankua of the Muslim communities from the sub-continent. The young generation learn Urdu from Indian/Pakistani films, more than two dozen TV Channels and couple of radio stations broadcasting round the clock in Urdu/Hindi. They can speak and understand but are unable to read and write Urdu literature and poetry. Bilingualism and bilingual education should be part and parcel of each and every Muslim school. The problem is that most of Muslim schools are running by British educated Muslims who are made monolinguals by state schools. They do not feel the charm of bilingualism. They have never been given the chance to learn Arabic and Urdu along with English. An English man is proud of his language, culture and faith or no faith. In the same way a Muslim should be proud of his faith, languages and cultures. In my opinion at least three hours a day must be given for the teaching of English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages from nursery level. The teaching of Standard English will help them to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. According to a recent report, Muslim schools performed best overall, although they constitute only a fraction of the country's 7000 schools. Muslim schools do well because of their Islamic ethos and a focus on traditional discipline and teaching methods. They teach children what is right and what is wrong, because young children need structured guidance. Bilingual Muslims children have a right, as much as any other faith group, to be taught their culture, languages and faith alongside a mainstream curriculum. More faith schools will be opened under sweeping reforms of the education system in England. There is a dire need for the growth of state funded Muslim schools to meet the growing needs and demands of the Muslim parents and children. Now the time has come that parents and community should take over the running of their local schools. Parent-run schools will give the diversity, the choice and the competition that the wealthy have in the private sector. Parents can perform a better job than the Local Authority because parents have a genuine vested interest. The Local Authority simply cannot be trusted. The British Government is planning to make it easier to schools to “opt out” from the Local Authorities. Muslim children in state schools feel isolated and confused about who they are. This can cause dissatisfaction and lead them into criminality, and the lack of a true understanding of Islam can ultimately make them more susceptible to the teachings of fundamentalists like Christians during the middle ages and Jews in recent times in Palestine. Fundamentalism is nothing to do with Islam and Muslim; you are either a Muslim or a non-Muslim. Muslim children suffer from identity crises because their parents teach them Islam and their schools teach them something else. There must be a positive co-relation between school and home, otherwise, children will suffer academically, spiritually , socially and emotionally. They are also unable to develop self-confidence and self-esteem. You better teach your children in your own schools and let migrant communities teach their children according to their needs and demands. British Establishment and society should concentrate on the evils of their own society and stop trying to change the way of life of Muslims. Muslim community does not want to integrate with the British society, indulging in incivility, anti-social behaviour, drug and knife culture, binge drinking, teenage pregnancies and abortion.  Prince Charles, while visiting the first grant maintained Muslim school in north London, said that the pupils would be the future ambassadors of Islam. But what about thousands of others, who attend state schools deemed to be "sink schools"? In education, there should be a choice and at present it is denied to the Muslim community. In the late 80s and early 90s, when I floated the idea of Muslim community schools, I was declared a "school hijacker" by an editorial in the Newham Recorder newspaper in east London. This clearly shows that the British media does not believe in choice and diversity in the field of education and has no respect for those who are different. Muslim schools, in spite of meager resources, have excelled to a further extent this year, with couple of schools achieving 100% A-C grades for five or more GCSEs. They beat well resourced state and independent schools in Birmingham and Hackney.  Muslim schools are doing better because a majority of the teachers are Muslim. The pupils are not exposed to the pressures of racism, multiculturalism and bullying. There are hundreds of state primary and secondary schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion all such schools may be opted out to become Muslim Academies. This mean the Muslim children will get a decent education. Muslim schools turned out balanced citizens, more tolerant of others and less likely to succumb to criminality or extremism. Muslim schools give young people confidence in who they are and an understanding of Islam’s teaching of tolerance and respect which prepares them for a positive and fulfilling role in society. Muslim schools are attractive to Muslim parents because they have better discipline and teaching Islamic values. Children like discipline, structure and boundaries. Bilingual Muslim children need Bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods, who understand their needs and demands.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4310d1 Comments ● 4309d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 15

HERE IS A CHANCE FOR EALING’S PEDESTRIANS TO HAVE THEIR SAY ABOUT PAVEMENT CYCLING WHERE IT REALLY MATTERS!The LONDON ASSEMBLY’s Transport Committee has just issued a report entitled “Feet First – Improving pedestrian safety in London” http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/publications/feet-first-improving-pedestrian-safety-in-london , together with: a CONSULTANCY DOCUMENT in the shape of draft “Pedestrian Action Safety Plan” https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streets/pedestrian-safety-plan/user_uploads/pedestrian-safety-action-plan.pdfBoth the report and the action plan are aimed at reducing pedestrian deaths/injuries on London’s roads.ONE GLARING OMISSION in both documents is the total absence of any reference to PAVEMENT CYCLING.Of course, IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING that PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL under the Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act subject to financial penalties under the 1999 the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (SI 1999/1851).THE TROUBLE IS that, as demonstrated by many of the 200-plus responses my thirteen "PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS” posts on EalingToday, unless NO PAVEMENT CYCLING is said clearly, signs displayed for all to understand and the law enforced by the Met Police, pavement cycling will continue to be seen by the growing number of cyclists as a ‘safe option’ (for themselves) response to the new cycling wave.I shall be submitting the draft GLA paper I published in earlier posts (reproduced below) in my comments on the TfL SAFETY ACTION PLAN in the hope of having the enforcement of the law against PAVEMENT CYCLING added into the plan.COMMENTS on the “Pedestrian Safety Action Plan” may be submitted on-line before 9th May at:https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streets/pedestrian-safety-plan/consultation/intro/view before 9th May.DON’T MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GET THE ERADICATION PAVEMENT CYCLING PUT ON THE AGENDA TOO.                                                ===============================A DRAFT PAPER TO THE LONDON ASSEMBLYPROPOSINGA PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE MET POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT BY THE EXERCISE OF THEIR POWERS UNDER  THE  ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988  GRANTED BY STATUTORY INSTRUMENT (SI 1999/1851) THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable stickers on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right, surrounding a pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol ].Hopefully with such a measure pavement cycling would in time attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places (Health Act 2006  http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml) and become as self-policing as the anti-smoking laws. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)PUBLIC ENCOURAGEMENT – Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures, to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement”                                         =======================

Tony Purton ● 4384d123 Comments ● 4339d

Angry

Damn I’m so angry.Just had the Northfields Ward ‘Vote Labour’ leaflet through my letterbox.The claims of their ‘successes’ are scandalous!“Labour kept Northfield Library open and provided better facilities”.Only after a concerted campaign by, inter alia, Eric Leach and West Ealing Neighbours who fought this same Labour council’s plans to close it or, at best, man it with ‘volunteers’. This ‘battle’ was won despite the loaded ‘consultation’ exercise from this Labour council.“Labour built the Log Cabin Children’s Centre.”What a dreadful sleight on the tireless work for over 30 years by the dedicated leaders and volunteers along with the countless number who raised, and continue to raise funds to support this vital service. The council provided funds to restore a neglected resources which provides, through a charity, a vital service at far lower cost than the council could.“Labour increased primary school places and plans more at Elthorne Park High School”Is meeting a statutory obligation to provide primary school places an achievement? Any council would have to do the same. This is the same ‘colour’ of council that shamelessly embarked on school rebuilding programmes via PFI which will see us all paying for the new buildings long after they have reached the end of their viable life.Then, to add insult to injury, I notice that one of the  Labour candidates is Cllr. Varma. Is this the same Cllr. Varma who was  deselected by his own ward party? . If so, if he was not good enough for Southall Broadway what Damascene conversion now makes him good enough for Northfields?Anyone who values this borough should cast their vote for any party other than labour.

Nigel Brooks ● 4346d2 Comments ● 4346d

Labour skimps on Central Ealing's roads

In the last two years the Labour council has allocated £6.5 million (in total for the two years together) of capital spending to resurfacing the Borough’s roads and pavements.  This sounds like a lot of money but it is half of what the previous administration spent on the roads.  You might think that on average this money would be fairly evenly spent across the Borough.  It isn’t.  Although the council claims to use objective assessments of roads and pavements the actual spending patterns do make you wonder.  In the one year 2011/12 50% of expenditure went to the 5 wards of Southall (they might expect to get 22% on average). In the one year 2012/13 49% of expenditure went to the 2 wards of Northolt (they might expect to get 9% on average).How much has gone to Central Ealing?  Over two years and six wards the council has spent £549K resurfacing ten roads or pavements in all of Central Ealing:Hollingbourne Gardens (road), ClevelandSutherland Road (right pavement), ClevelandHaven Green (road), Ealing BroadwayRavensbourne Gardens (road), Ealing BroadwayThe Knoll (both pavements), Ealing BroadwayGreystoke Gardens (road), Hanger HillChilton Road (both pavements), NorthfieldsRegina Road (road), WalpoleChapel Road (road), WalpoleClovelly Road (road), WalpoleEaling Common had nothing at all.  This represents 8.4% of the Borough’s total spend.  If the six wards had received an equal share they might have expected to get 26% of the total, some 17.6% or £1.144K more.  You can work out for yourself if you think that Central Ealing is getting a good deal.  More details here:http://philtaylor.org.uk/2012/11/labours-road-spending-games/

Phil Taylor ● 4899d19 Comments ● 4350d

What DO our elected Councillors and Council Officers REALLY DO?

Gerry (Mr Tan)! Based on your recent comments on this Forum about the quality of Bond Street I purposefully went off and looked at Bond Street again. Perhaps I was being too unkind? The build quality of the pavement is really good. The natural stone flags have stood the test of footfall and weather well. However, it is the build quality of the work that was done five years that has allowed the street to remain straight and level. Around this, however, there is an air of creeping neglect that suggests that Ealing Council does not really care what is happening hear, or cannot maintain the road. Whether this is financial, political, or due to the main Contractors (Enterprise!) I do not know, however my investigation is intriguing.Starting at the North-East top corner of Bond Street there is a (once-) white painted grill that opens onto the street:It is ajar and reveals what looks like several years of accrued rubbish.As you go down the street you notice the way in which the local businesses are narrowing the busy pavement with their planters and “window boxes” making it difficult to go along the pavement more than one abreast in certain places.The impressive and robust planters have withstood a few years of hard use, however, are clearly not being looked after. On closer inspection this planter has an extensive collection of cigarette ends, rubbish and weeds inside it.Further down the street the topiarised Buxus hedge balls have been allowed to die completely and not replaced. Some sensible individual thought to put some annual bedding in here as a temporary stop gap, though on closer inspection there is nice selection of rubbish and cigarette ends in there; a length of rusty braided wire rope loops up from the soil (originally used as to anchor the roots of the Buxus to stop it being pulled up by thieves and vandals it remains) to trap the unwary child's fingers...Further down the street there are more dying bushes and a staved-in container (this plant is in need of urgent help), and yet more rubbish.Across the road there is a damaged parking meter with yellow and black tape on it leaning at a strange angle awaiting repair.Overshadowing it all across a quarter of the West side of Bond Street are the closed and boarded front of the old YMCA and the associated charity shops; bought by the Council for use as part of the projected film quarter development. Boarded and empty they represent an important asset that the community could use.Bond Street in Ealing, being at the very centre of wealth and business in Ealing, you think would attract greater scrutiny than it does from the main political parties: situated in a Conservative ward in a Borough run by a Labour Council you would think both Conservatives and Labour would be micro-managing this prime site? However, it seems to be suffering the same level of indifference from both parties except, of course, Southall. You would think that all parties would be jumping up and down on the Council Officers and the contractors to ensure Bond Street was A1plusplus AND CLAIMING THIS FOR THEMSELVES. Especially as there is a local election in May!As a final thought, the quality of the real stone pavement seems to have given it a longer life than a cheaper alternative, however, I think that we must bear in mind that this project was conceived and enacted in wealthier times, i.e. before the “credit crunch” and what was acceptable and indeed lauded is not now. The pavement in front of Ealing Town Hall is over-ostentatious, and the immensely expensive cut granite paving stones being used in Southall have a positively “Marie Antoniette – Let them eat Cake” factor about them in  the light of emerging food banks. Based on a stroll through the quality retail street of Central Ealing, I am lead to wonder yet again what the politicians who say they are represent us are actually do?

Peter Mcleod ● 4378d13 Comments ● 4350d

Why isn't planning an election issue?

I had hoped that the borough's under resourced planning department would become an election issue but it would appear that all parties are studiously avoiding it. Perhaps there's just too much potential for embarrassment where certain local politicians are concerned for it to be a comfortable subject for discussion. Over the last two years I have had more contact with the department than I ever wanted (1. a surprise demolition plus the absurd planning applications that followed it, 2. the outhouse complete with shower and toilet that has been built two metres from our kitchen window, 3. an attempt to discover the planning history relating to the Starlite Ballroom) and I am appalled at its inability to cope with its caseload. I am very concerned about the increase in run off caused by the loss of front (and in some cases back) gardens but no one seems willing to address the issue. Telling homeowners that they shouldn't buy a house with a garden if they don't want one isn't a vote winner but I have wondered how much it is costing everyone to deal with extra surface water, something that could be reduced if the rules were enforced. The green waste charge isn't enough of an excuse. It would be interesting to know how many councillors and prospective councillors have exceeded the permitted five square metres of paving outside their properties. I would welcome some support and advice on the council website about how to reinstate a front garden (we are trying to break up a patch of tarmac by letting things grow through it). A grant or reduced council tax for those who do so is probably too much to ask for.

Albertina McNeill ● 4359d11 Comments ● 4351d

'Heartbleed' Bug: Change ALL Of Your Passwords Warn Security Experts

'Heartbleed bug' exposes encryption keys; How to test your favourite sites for safetyNot much consumers can do to fix the problem.Published 09 April 2014  |  Brownie MarieEmail Print Text Size Larger SmallerMore Sharing Services ShareCodenomiconA flaw in the popular OpenSSL software has left millions of people vulnerable to having their banking information, tax files, emails, and other online data exposed. And there's no way to know if someone has accessed your information.Nicknamed "Heartbleed," the "bug" is actually a weakness in OpenSSL's cryptographic software that makes SSL/TLS encryption backfire on computer users. The "https" protocol that is supposed to identify a secure website is actually a signal to hackers that the site is vulnerable to cyber attack. The hackers can then trick a computer's server into sending data stored in its memory.Google security researcher Neel Mehta was the first to discover Heartbleed, and the weakness was confirmed by internet security firm Codenomicon. Alarmingly, researchers found that the Heartbleed flaw has been in OpenSSL for two years. It is unknown if attacks have been carried out, because exploiting the software loophole leaves no trace.In addition to exposing users' passwords, personal files, and credit card information, hackers can also steal encryption keys-- the code that translates computer-generated nonsense into usable information."It may even be able to use the secret key to impersonate the server, tricking users into divulging their password and other sensitive information," Vox Media wrote.Codenomicon states that because of the wide-spread use of OpenSSL and the untraceability of Heartbleed, consider your accounts compromised."You are likely to be affected either directly or indirectly," their website, Heartbleed.com states. "OpenSSL is the most popular open source cryptographic library and TLS (transport layer security) implementation used to encrypt traffic on the Internet. Your popular social site, your company's site, commercial site, hobby site, sites you install software from or even sites run by your government might be using vulnerable OpenSSL."To end Heartbleed's hold on the server, vendors and service providers must adopt the Fixed OpenSSL, which was released Monday."Operating system vendors and distribution, appliance vendors, independent software vendors have to adopt the fix and notify their users," Codenomicon instructs. "Service providers and users have to install the fix as it becomes available for the operating systems, networked appliances and software they use."Changing your passwords before the server has adopted Fixed OpenSSL is useless. As of today, most of the major websites, including Yahoo, Google, and Facebook, have fixed the problem. To check if a website has installed the updated OpenSSL software, visit http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/....................................................................,,...................................................................................................................................................................................................................Yahoo Among Millions of Websites Vulnerable to 'Heartbleed' OpenSSL Security BugA new security bug has been found in OpenSSL, the cryptographic library that secures most of the internet's websites, and Yahoo is one of the of the most well-known domains known to have been compromised.Security researchers are very concerned as the bug - dubbed Heartbleed - has been around for two years and affects encryption of data sent over the internet, meaning users' passwords and other sensitive data are open to being spied on.Other websites featured on the top 1,000 websites list compiled by Mustafa Al-Bassam (a former member of the LulzSec hacker collective who is now a computer science student) include popular websites like Imgur, Flickr, OKCupid, WeTransfer, Eventbrite, Web.de, Outbrain, Stackexchange and Kickass Torrents.It will be difficult to discover if or when you have been compromised as attackers are able to exploit the flaw without leaving any trace of their presence.    What is OpenSSL?    OpenSSL is the software library used in servers, operating systems, email and instant messaging systems to protect internet traffic as it travels back and forth. More than 53% of the web servers which host more than 500 million websites use the software which relies on OpenSSL    (Source: NetCraft)DiscoveredThe bug was first brought to light by security firm Codenomicon, who attempted to attack their own servers:"We have tested some of our own services from attacker's perspective. We attacked ourselves from outside, without leaving a trace. Without using any privileged information or credentials we were able steal from ourselves the secret keys used for our X.509 certificates, user names and passwords, instant messages, emails and business critical documents and communication," they wrote on an in-depth information page.Codenomicon adds that anyone on the internet exploiting the flaw will be able to read the memory of a machine that's protected by a vulnerable version of the OpenSSL library.Security researcher Filippo Valsorda has developed an online test that allows anyone to find out whether a server is vulnerable to being attacked, simply by entering the server's hostname.Not an TLS/SSL flawA new version of OpenSSL, version 1.0.1g is now available to download to patch the flaw, which was caused by an implementation problem in the OpenSSL cryptography library, not a design flaw in SSL/TLS - the protocols used to provide secure communication online."There is no flaw in the TLS protocol or the way it is designed, it's simply an implementation bug that has a catastrophic failure mode. The error is the code equivalent of a typo. But some typos are worse than others," explains Paco Hope, Principal Consultant, at Cigital, a consulting firm which helps organisations to develop secure software."The vulnerabilities in the software you use matter just as much as vulnerabilities in code you write. Finding and fixing such bugs requires applying security throughout the software lifecycle and on all the relevant code, not exclusively at the end and not just exclusively on code you write. And if you acquire software from third parties, you care about what they integrate into the product as much as what they write for you."Fox IT has published a list of indicators that can help companies to identify if their servers may be vulnerable.According to Fox IT, attackers can retrieve the source code of the website, usernames and passwords, as well as private SSL keys.

Nikki Howard ● 4380d10 Comments ● 4366d

What DO our elected Councillors and Council Officers REALLY DO?

Gerry (Mr Tan)! Based on your recent comments on this Forum about the quality of Bond Street I purposefully went off and looked at Bond Street again. Perhaps I was being too unkind? The build quality of the pavement is really good. The natural stone flags have stood the test of footfall and weather well. However, it is the build quality of the work that was done five years that has allowed the street to remain straight and level. Around this, however, there is an air of creeping neglect that suggests that Ealing Council does not really care what is happening hear, or cannot maintain the road. Whether this is financial, political, or due to the main Contractors (Enterprise!) I do not know, however my investigation is intriguing.Starting at the North-East top corner of Bond Street there is a (once-) white painted grill that opens onto the street:It is ajar and reveals what looks like several years of accrued rubbish.As you go down the street you notice the way in which the local businesses are narrowing the busy pavement with their planters and “window boxes” making it difficult to go along the pavement more than one abreast in certain places.The impressive and robust planters have withstood a few years of hard use, however, are clearly not being looked after. On closer inspection this planter has an extensive collection of cigarette ends, rubbish and weeds inside it.Further down the street the topiarised Buxus hedge balls have been allowed to die completely and not replaced. Some sensible individual thought to put some annual bedding in here as a temporary stop gap, though on closer inspection there is nice selection of rubbish and cigarette ends in there; a length of rusty braided wire rope loops up from the soil (originally used as to anchor the roots of the Buxus to stop it being pulled up by thieves and vandals it remains) to trap the unwary child's fingers...Further down the street there are more dying bushes and a staved-in container (this plant is in need of urgent help), and yet more rubbish.Across the road there is a damaged parking meter with yellow and black tape on it leaning at a strange angle awaiting repair.Overshadowing it all across a quarter of the West side of Bond Street are the closed and boarded front of the old YMCA and the associated charity shops; bought by the Council for use as part of the projected film quarter development. Boarded and empty they represent an important asset that the community could use.Bond Street in Ealing, being at the very centre of wealth and business in Ealing, you think would attract greater scrutiny than it does from the main political parties: situated in a Conservative ward in a Borough run by a Labour Council you would think both Conservatives and Labour would be micro-managing this prime site? However, it seems to be suffering the same level of indifference from both parties except, of course, Southall. You would think that all parties would be jumping up and down on the Council Officers and the contractors to ensure Bond Street was A1plusplus AND CLAIMING THIS FOR THEMSELVES. Especially as there is a local election in May!As a final thought, the quality of the real stone pavement seems to have given it a longer life than a cheaper alternative, however, I think that we must bear in mind that this project was conceived and enacted in wealthier times, i.e. before the “credit crunch” and what was acceptable and indeed lauded is not now. The pavement in front of Ealing Town Hall is over-ostentatious, and the immensely expensive cut granite paving stones being used in Southall have a positively “Marie Antoniette – Let them eat Cake” factor about them in  the light of emerging food banks. Based on a stroll through the quality retail street of Central Ealing, I am lead to wonder yet again what the politicians who say they are represent us are actually do?

Peter Mcleod ● 4378d0 Comments ● 4378d

Guerrilla Gardening - Saturday 1st March

Some of you might know the unloved pathway between the Northfield Avenue allotments and the gardens of Loveday Road. You can see it on the google map here..http://tinyurl.com/od67gqgWe've* recently discovered that the pathway belongs to the allotments, which was a bit of a surpise.  So we have decided to adopt it and try and tidy it up. The short term plan is to clear the mud off the tarmac path, sow wildflowers and build a loggery for the stag beetles (which have been spotted on the allotments). We have made a start and you can see what we've already done here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walk-putting-our-plan-actionThe long term plan for the pathway - which we have named Radbourne Walk - is to manage it as a wildlife corridor. We also want ot make it a pleasant place for people too. So if you use it as a short cut or take the dog for a walk we hope you'll find it a pleasant place to be and actually walk along with a spring in your step as you enjoy the flowers. ;-) You can find out more about what inspired us and what our plans are - here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walkIf you are up for a bit of volunteer gardening - you'd be very welcome - even if you only spare us an hour.The next session in on Saturday 1st  March. Our aim is to clean another section of path, we’ll also sow another wildflower meadow and create the first loggery for the stag beetles.We will be working on the lower section near Occupation Road. If you would like to volunteer bring a garden fork, spade, rake or stiff broom. We'll meet on the footpath at 10am on Saturday 1st March for a quick briefing and then off we go. Do let us know if you are coming  (email  allotmentsw13@gmail.com )  - just so we can bring enough tea bags ;-)Christina FoxChair: Ealing Dean Allotment Society* We are the newly formed Ealing Dean Allotment Society - set up to manage the allotments in Northfields Avenue on behalf on our landlord Pathways. All our members are plot holders at Northfields.The aims of the Society are:2.1           To provide a safe, secure, accessible and well-managed allotment site for the benefit of the Members of the Society (“the Members”)2.2           To improve and enhance the allotments for the greater convenience and enjoyment of the Members2.3           To be a good neighbour to the local community2.4           To conserve the allotment as a green space in a built-up area and secure its long term use as allotment gardens and a haven for wildlife and its conservation2.5           To contribute to healthy living through open-air physical activity and the cultivation of natural food produce, flowers and fruit trees2.6           To foster community fellowship and social relationships between Members, irrespective of age, gender, faith, race, ethnic origin, disability or sexual orientation.2.7           To promote the art, science and practice of horticulture among Members and the wider community of Ealing.

Christina Fox ● 4427d21 Comments ● 4380d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 12

An open letter to Ealing’s Council Leader Councillor Julian Bell published in the Ealing Gazette Friday 21 March 2014GOING DUTCH [is last resort for town - editor]Ealing Council’s plan to create a ‘mini-Holland’ for cyclists in the Borough (Gazette 14 March) may conjure up visions of cyclists freely sharing the pavements with pedestrians.I would like to remind the plan’s author, Councillor Julian Bell, that shared use of footpaths is very much a last resort for town planners according to the Department for Transport guidance “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists”. This document says among other things; “It is important to recognise that pedestrians and cyclists are not homogeneous groups and their needs vary considerably”; “Where the need for cyclists to use existing footways or footpaths has been identified …….. their right to be there must be established by changing the legal status of the footway or footpath to that of a cycle track.”; “Where the facility is an adjacent use one - the remainder is a footway or footpath”; “It is illegal for a cyclist to ride on the pedestrian side, but the cycle track will normally retain a right of way for people on foot.”  “No impression should be given that it is acceptable to cycle on the pedestrian side.” “This may need to be reinforced by local publicity and enforcement action.” Perhaps the first thing Councillor Bell should do is spend a small amount of the considerable funds allocated for improving cycling facilities in the Borough on a poster campaign emphasising the illegality of pavement cycling under Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 and the penalties for doing so under the 1999 amendment to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (SI 1999/1851), no mention of which appears in any of the Council’s propaganda or training literature encouraging the greater use of cycles.Tony Purton – by e-mailThe following draft paper to the Greater London Assembly sets out this proposition in the simplest terms. If Ealing Council really wants to ‘lead’ in encouraging more cycling in the Borough it should set an example to other London Boroughs by actively discourage pavement cycling, and act before it is pushed!                          A DRAFT PAPER TO THE GREATER LONDON ASSEMBLY                                                         PROPOSING                   A PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES                                                   ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT AS INTENDED BY THE CREATION OF FIXED PENALTY POWERS UNDER THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988 – SI 1999/1851 THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable self-adhesive labels on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right on a white background, surrounding a black pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol .Such a measure would ensure that no-one could be in any doubt about the law. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI 1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)6.  Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.THE EFFECT - Hopefully the result would be that in time pavement cycling will attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places, a criminal offence under the Health Act 2006,  and become as self-policing as the ‘SmokeFree’ laws; the enforcement of which is the responsibility of managers of ‘smokefree’ premises through compulsory signage and ‘verbal’ warnings to customers under the supervision of local authority enforcement officers, such as environmental health officers, trading standards or local community support officers – if physical violence is threatened by a person smoking, managers should seek assistance from the police. See http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social as well as an illegal activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement” [see PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 6 on Page  6 or 7]=======================OFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/madeLTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists:  http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/LTN%202- 04%20Adjacent%20and%20Shared%20Use%20Facilities%20for%20Pedestrians%20and%20Cyclists.pdf

Tony Purton ● 4399d41 Comments ● 4380d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 14

I have forwarded a compendium of all my EalingToday posts on PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS to Tony Armstrong CEO of LIVING STREETS together with a compendium of all the comments those posts have attracted.Mr Armstrong has assured me that all the points I make are reflected in LIVING STREETS’ policy briefing dated November 2009 which can be accessed on this link.http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/sites/default/files/content/library/Policy_briefings/pb0309pedcycle.pdfThis paper represents a very different view of LIVING STREETS policy towards pavement cycling to the imaginary conversations with Living Streets reported by Ben Owen in his three responses to PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 10 [on 11/02/14 and 14/02/14] as the following extracts demonstrate:“The main points of this paper can be summarised as follows: • Pedestrians and cyclists share many common objectives when it comes to urban planning – both  forms of transport have been marginalised at the expense of motor vehicles; •  Pavement cycling is illegal and the law must be better enforced; • Off-carriageway provision for cyclists must never come at the expense of pedestrian space, safety, or amenity. Local action •  Greater enforcement by local police forces of cycling offences, particularly pavement cycling, including targeted crackdowns where appropriate; •  When designing off-road routes for cyclists, segregated, as long as sufficient width is available, is generally preferable to shared use; “Living Streets believes that promoting modal shift to cycling through urban design should not be achieved at the expense of pedestrian space and amenity – but rather through the reallocation of space away from motorised traffic.” “We think that the Home Office guidance above is not strong enough. A pavement cyclist, by definition, is not showing “consideration to other road users” through the very fact that they are invading the space of the most vulnerable.”LET PEDESTRIANS TAKE NOTE AND ACT TO PROTECT THEIR PRECIOUS 'SAFE HAVEN' ENVIRONMENT - THE PUBLIC FOOTPATHS!

Tony Purton ● 4393d4 Comments ● 4392d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 11

“I can see Pavements are for pedestrians - Part 11 coming shortly”; Nigel Brooks post 14/02/14 18:18:00WARNING – SOME OF THE INFORMATION BELOW COULD CAUSE DISTRESS TO OVER-SENSITIVE READERS!“YOU ARE FREE NOT TO READ THE THREAD AND NOT TO COMMENT”; Phillipa Bond post 07/03/14 08:51:00    STALEMATE? The lively discussion on this topic which has been raging for the last two months seems to have dried up. Is it due to Lenten observance, or have the ‘opinion formers’ who seem to dominate the pages of the ‘ealingtoday’ Forum finally run out of RED HERRING arguments to offer? Too much ‘free speech’ can, it seems, lead to verbal indigestion!Prompted by the 170-odd collective ‘musings’ on this topic I refer readers to the DfT’s guidance for Town Planners “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists” which provides authoritative answers to some of the rare ‘on topic’ points made ‘in debate’. See http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/LTN%202-04%20Adjacent%20and%20Shared%20Use%20Facilities%20for%20Pedestrians%20and%20Cyclists.pdfIT OFFERS THE FOLLOWING GEMS:STATEMENTS OF THE OBVIOUS: 3.1.1.Schemes that involve adjacent or shared use of space between pedestrians and cyclists may be contentious, particularly when the scheme introduces cyclists into areas previously reserved solely for pedestrians. 3.2.3 IT IS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNISE THAT PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS ARE NOT HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS AND THEIR NEEDS VARY CONSIDERABLY. SHARED USE FOOTPATHS ARE A MEASURE OF LAST RESORT: 3.1.2.The process can be summarised thus: identify the need for a cycle route within a particular corridor; check for possible on-carriageway solutions; IF AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED conduct a site assessment to determine whether adjacent or shared use is feasible; and if it is feasible, determine what form the facility should take. If not, CHECK AGAIN FOR ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTIONS or alternative alignments. Ultimately, RETAINING THE CURRENT ARRANGEMENT MAY BE THE PREFERRED COURSE OF ACTION. 3.4.1 It should not automatically be assumed that cyclists can be better served off the carriageway because an improved on-carriageway solution is not available. 5.2.5.If it is decided to abandon the proposal, THE SEARCH FOR AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTION MAY BEGIN AGAIN.ILLEGAL FOOTPATH CYCLING MAY BE AN INDICATION OR THE NEED FOR AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY ROUTE: 4.3.10 Illegal cycling on the footpath or footway is recorded. This can indicate both a problem and a desire line to be addressed. If cyclists take to the footway only occasionally, this may indicate that on-road measures to assist cyclists at those locations are more suitable than an adjacent or shared use route.SAFETY INCLUDES PERCEIVED SAFETY: 4.5.3. Any notable changes to conditions for pedestrians should be noted. In most cases, journey times will be unaffected and in a facility with sufficient width, the safety and comfort will also be unaffected. SAFETY IN THIS CONTEXT SHOULD INCLUDE CHANGES TO PERCEIVED SAFETY. CONSULTATION IS A MUST: 5.1.1. A thorough consultation process should be applied no matter what legal process is being used to create the cycle track. Before recommending the detailed design of an adjacent or shared facility, it is essential to seek the views of user groups and others likely to have an interest. LEGAL: 10.1.1. Where the need for cyclists to use existing footways or footpaths has been identified at a specification, their right to be there must be established by changing the legal status of the footway or footpath to that of a cycle track. A SHARED FOOTPATH REMAINS A FOOTPATH IN LAW: 10.1.2. ……… Where the facility is an adjacent use one - the remainder is a footway or footpath. IT IS ILLEGAL FOR A CYCLIST TO RIDE ON THE PEDESTRIAN SIDE. [See also Highway Code rule 62 ] 6.1.5 …….. PEDESTRIANS CAN LEGALLY USE A CYCLE TRACK BUT CYCLISTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO RIDE ON THE PEDESTRIAN SIDE. POLICE TO ENFORCE: 10.2.1  A considerable amount of public concern is generated by cyclists misusing footways and footpaths, particularly where badly planned or designed facilities encourage such behaviour. 10.2.2 Cycling on the footway in England and Wales is an offence under Section 72 of the Highways Act1835 as amended by Section 85Å1Ç of the Local Government Act 1888. 10.2.3.Enforcement is a matter for the Police. INVALID CARRIAGES CAN USE THE PAVEMENTS: 10.3.3. An invalid carriage can be used on footways, footpaths, bridleways or pedestrianised areas providing that it is used in accordance with the prescribed requirements. Invalid carriages have no specific right to use a cycle track but users commit no offence in doing so, unless an order or local bye-law exists creating one.ALSO:EALING’S BY-LAWS GOVERNING CYCLING IN THE BOROUGH’S PARKS can be found at: http://www.ealing.gov.uk/downloads/download/713/parks_and_open_spaces_by-laws Para (1)(11) says: “No person shall, without reasonable excuse, ride a cycle, except in any part of the ground where there is a right of way for cycles, or along such routes as may be fixed by the Council and indicated by signs placed in conspicuous positions in the ground.”AND:EALING’S ‘MINI HOLLAND’ PROGRAMME:  Ealing Council is bidding to create a MINI HOLLAND for cyclists within the borough – see  http://www.ealing.gov.uk/downloads/download/2548/mini_holland_cycle_bidFINALLY:Last Monday BBC2’s ‘Top Gear’ team presented their own ideas on improving road cycling safety to Westminster Council – available on i-Player.KEEP DEATH OFF THE ROADS BY ALL MEANS, BUT DON’T BRING IT ONTO THE PAVEMENTS. CHECKMATE!COMPLAINTS about the content of the above documents should be addressed to:DfT minister Robert Goodwill – re “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists”Councillor Bassam Mahfouz (bassam.mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk) , Ealing Council Cabinet Member for Transport and the Environment: re EALING’S BY-LAWS GOVERNING CYCLING IN THE BOROUGH’S PARKSJulian Bell (julian.bell@ealing.gov.uk) Leader Ealing Council: re EALING’S ‘MINI HOLLAND’ PROGRAMMEhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/: re Top Gear’s programme Monday 24 February

Tony Purton ● 4412d18 Comments ● 4400d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 10

TO THE PEDESTRIAN ‘SILENT MAJORITY’IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE - HAVE YOUR SAY  CONTACT LIVING STREETS info@livingstreets.org.uk see: http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streets (T)WITTERING ON THIS WEBSITE IS A WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY AND WILL CHANGE NOTHING. COMMENTS SO FAR: Living Streets have been provided with a compendium of the 134 comments on this topic posted on this Forum by just 25 people demonstrating all the usual prejudices against the enforcement of the law against pavement cycling for which the police were granted fixed penalty powers 15 years ago under the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851.MOST SENSIBLE CONTRIBUTION yet by Phillipa Bond: “NOT everybody does know that it is illegal to cycle on the pavement  - It would be good if everybody DID know that cycling is illegal on the pavement and DID appreciate that the pavement is used by many elderly people who can/do no longer drive/cycle and for whom a fall could be devastating. Unfortunately they don't and because people are more self-centred nowadays they often just don't want to know when told and are dismissive of anything that doesn't suit them.” [see ‘Dear Tony Purton’ comment 29/01/14 12:03:00] =================================A DRAFT PAPER TO THE GREATER LONDON ASSEMBLYPROPOSINGA PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT AS INTENDED BY THE CREATION OF FIXED PENALTY POWERS UNDER THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988 – SI 1999/1851 THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable self-adhesive labels on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right on a white background, surrounding a black pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol .Such a measure would ensure that no-one could be in any doubt about the law. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI 1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)6.  Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.THE EFFECT - Hopefully the result would be that in time pavement cycling will attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places, a criminal offence under the Health Act 2006,  and become as self-policing as the ‘SmokeFree’ laws; the enforcement of which is the responsibility of managers of ‘smokefree’ premises through compulsory signage and ‘verbal’ warnings to customers under the supervision of local authority enforcement officers, such as environmental health officers, trading standards or local community support officers – if physical violence is threatened by a person smoking, managers should seek assistance from the police. See http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social as well as an illegal activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement” [see PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 6 on Page 4]=======================OFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/made

Tony Purton ● 4442d61 Comments ● 4409d

EALING HOSPITAL A&E DEPARTMENT

My visit to Ealing Hospital Urgent Care Unit was a pleasant experience considering I ended up waiting for 3 hours to be seen and left with a leg in plaster. While speaking to the nurse initially I asked what the latest news was on Ealing’s A&E department closing. She said she wasn’t confident it would stay open, but very concerned as to where A&E patients would go as those hospitals such as Northwick Park are under so much strain as they currently stand, I can only imagine! Following my x-ray I had my consultation with a Doctor who I asked again about the A&E department closing, his response was “of course it is going to close!”I was taken back and had to ask why he was so confident in his response, he replied “If there were more white people in the area no one would think about closing the Ealing A&E but it’s not, if this was Kensington & Chelsea do you think they would even think about it?”I had to agree with what he said but I did add that the community of the Ealing borough was very strong and hopefully their support and petitions would prevail. The Doctor made a very good point I wanted to share - Unfortunately we live in a Western society where the Media and Celebrity statuses have a huge impact on impressions made, political decisions made in our big bad society. How can “we” as the Ealing community keep Ealing Hospital A&E OPEN?How can “we” the Ealing Community get a “celebrity” however shallow the idea is “we” the community need the Ealing Hospital A&E department to stay for our Children, our Neighbours, our Friends and Families a Celebrity might just help with “our fight?”

Sasha Brown ● 4423d7 Comments ● 4421d

Closure of Maternity Unit at Ealing Hospital

No More Babies Born In EalingMeeting to launch a Campaign to Save the Maternity Unit at Ealing HospitalTuesday  4th March7.00pmNorthfield Community Centre 71A Northcroft Rd : West Ealing: W13 9SS Underground - Northfield (Piccadilly Line): Bus - E3 • The Maternity Unit at Ealing Hospital is to close.• Children’s services (paediatrics) are to close.• A&E is to be down graded to an urgent care centre.2015 is targeted for the closure of the maternity unit IF capacity can be found at Northwick Park; West Middlesex or Hillingdon Hospital. Theoretically expectant mothers have a choice of any hospital that provides maternity services but in practice not all have availability at the time needed.The maternity department at Ealing was purpose built. It recently upgraded its facilities and now has a total of 11 birthing rooms; three are home-from-home labour suites with one of the three having a pool for water births.  The labour ward has a dedicated operating theatre and recovery room with ease of access to a 15-cot special care baby unit. All this is to go.These closures will mean long journeys to hospitals outside the borough of Ealing. We would welcome to this meeting anyone interested in joining, and helping to plan, a campaign to save the maternity and paediatric department at Ealing Hospital.IF you are unable to attend the meeting but would like us to keep you informed about the campaign please let us know. Thelma Leach (not Eric!)

Eric Alan Leach ● 4431d9 Comments ● 4421d

Why have crossings at Greenford Flyover?

Greenford Green Labour has raised safety at Greenford Flyover as a local priority. It says that they will work with TfL to introduce surface level crossings. Not a new idea, a local Conservative councillor has been promoting this for some time. Why indulge those who are too lazy to use the subways? Their excuse for crossing the slip roads is that they fear being mugged or even murdered in the space under the Flyover but that could happen to them anywhere. On schooldays you will see more than one parent dodging traffic with their children, often with a phone clamped to one ear, because they are late. Apart from being a real menace to responsible drivers this provides a very poor example to the next generation of pedestrians. Other parents make the effort to turn up on time and at certain times of day there are quite a few people with pushchairs using the subways. They aren't perfect, they are quite steep and the dogleg layout makes CCTV coverage awkward, but I still see them being used by people on mobility scooters and cyclists. The opening of William Perkin High School near these subways was a major concern for me and I commented on it during the planning application stage. Whoever is responsible for the area under the flyover has cut back the bushes and undergrowth since the school was launched, and the steps have been improved.A more intelligent option would be to make it much harder to cross the slip roads (higher, more substantial barriers) while using that space for an air-conditioned community building in use 24 hours a day. A walk-in medical centre, a police station, a cybercafe and even a local radio station could make that space useful. It is not suitable for a skate park - it is below street level, out of sight of the road, and and I could feel the effects of the noise and emissions when I was down there for two hours with Henry Shaftoe, a lecturer in Planning and Architecture along with Chris Vallance of BBC Radio 4 on a hot day. Henry Shaftoe has been active in improving a similar space in Bristol (read about it here:  https://info.uwe.ac.uk/news/uwenews/news.aspx?id=1895).One of my neighbours, who admits he has never used the subways since it was built in 1979, wants the space filled with concrete, which shows a profound lack of understanding as to how such structures work. If the crossings are put in place the area under the flyover could be used as a nature reserve, with access limited in the same way that it is at Perivale Wood. It could soak up all the run off caused by the loss of front gardens. It would be interesting to see what local members of the Selborne Society and Friends of the Earth think of this idea. Here is a short video for all those who, like my neighbour, have never been under Greenford Flyover, recorded before the growth was cut back: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BPcfRRaKbs&feature=youtu.be

Albertina McNeill ● 4423d6 Comments ● 4422d

Over the hill so we don't deserve a pill???

How wonderful - how caring....now the Department for Health proposals would mean that elderly patients would be denied life saving drugs just because they have reached a certain age?Previously we had to contend with a 'postcode lottery' which meant that treatment would be given (or not) depending on where one lived.Now we have the powers that be thinking of a new way to save money - let the elderly go to hell, let's concentrate on those who would benefit society! What do they want to do - do mercy killings? Are the elderly such a burden on society no use to anyone?How do they know if the younger person is actually doing anything to benefit society? Will they check that they are acctually working before givinng treatment on the NHS?What about the elderly who volunteer to help others? What about the role of grandparents? Pensioners worked and contributed to this very society and are rewarded with one of the lowest pensions in Europe.So let me get this straight, first they want to take away our Freedom Passes, the Winter Fuel Allowance, Free TV Licence for the over 75's. Transport by taxi cars for the disabled is also under consideration and this service may be scrapped in April next year.  Then of course those pensioners who do have savings, well they have lost out on miserable interest rates and have done so for years.Pensioners who fall ill and need long term care in a Nursing Home would have to sell their property to pay for it, but the reckless and the feckless would get all this care for FREE. And they say that pensioners are getting away lightly whilst everyone else is having to tighten their belts? Now there is evidence that closing the A&E wards means taking risks with patient's lives because they have to travel further to get treatment - what on earth is happeninng to our NHS which was something the nation could be proud of.The NHS has wasted money for YEARS, so before they go down the proposed route of denying treatment to the elderly perhaps they should first consider the following:Stop surgery which is simply for cosmetic reasons - boob jobs and the like. If the patient wants this then ask them to pay towards it.Let the drunks pay something towards their treatment, same goes for the drug addicts - anything that is self inflicted, unless they are willing to help themselves.Health tourists - they should pay for treatment - it's not the International Health Service!Cut back on Hospital Managers and consider bringing back Matron.Let those who are not entitled to free treatment pay for it!Charge a small fee for missed appointments, if it the patient at fault.And do the unthinkable - check how much is being misappropriated from the hospital!Think of the many ways savings could be made but STOP PICKING ON PENSIONERS!!!

Jean F Fernandez ● 4430d20 Comments ● 4422d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 9

Topic: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 9 Posted by: Tony Purton Date/Time: 29/01/14 17:26:00 FOR THE ‘SILENT MAJORITY’ – THE PEDESTRIANSPAVEMENT CYCLING IS A NATIONAL PROBLEMHAVE YOUR SAY – CONTACT LIVING STREETS info@livingstreets.org.uk http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streets AND THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES LISTED BELOWOFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/madeFixed Penalty £50   Fine: £500FOLLOW THE NATIONAL DEBATE ON BBC RADIO 4PM’s 17 JANUARY 2014 between Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) Presenter: Eddie MairEDDIE MAIR:  The UK’s Minister for Cycling wants cyclists to use the pavements. Well, to be precise, Robert Goodwill says cyclists should not be fined for mounting the pavement if they are escaping a dangerous section of road. In an e-mail to a cycling campaigner the minister said that discretion should be exercised; QUOTE “When a cyclist is using the pavement alongside a dangerous section of road by the speed of the traffic.” He said enforcement was up to the police but he reiterated guidance from 1999 when fixed penalties for cycling on pavements were introduced. It states that the goal was not to penalise responsible cyclists. Robert Goodwill said “Cyclists must be mindful not to put pedestrians at risk.”Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of the Living Streets a charity that represents pedestrians. Roger Geffen Policy Director of the cycling charity CTCEDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong, what do you think of what the cycling minister has said?TONY ARMSTRONG: Well we’re disappointed in this. We were opposed to the original guidance when it came out because we don’t believe there is a happy compromise were a cyclist can responsibly cycle on the pavement. Many pedestrians value that safe haven status the pavements give them, particularly older people and people with disabilities. So saying that because we have failed to make the roads safe for cyclists we should create another problem by creating intimidation for pedestrians, we think that is not the right solution.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever cycled?TONY ARMSTRONG: I cycle every day. I cycle in London every day and I know exactly how unsafe and fearful it can be.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever felt on a stretch of road where you feel in danger that if you could just get on the pavement for a moment that would be a good thing?TONY ARMSTRONG: Yeah absolutely. And what we’re saying is that if someone is in immediate danger of being in a collision or in immediate threat then get on the pavement. All the pedestrians that are on that pavement would absolutely be fine with that. We are not talking about where people are in immediate danger. The problem is when lots of people feel nervous, and who’s to define what a dangerous road is, because if you feel nervous and if you feel fearful about cycling then you just think ‘Oh, the minister has put this guidance out – I’ll just cycle on the pavements’; and many people are already using the pavements because they don’t feel particularly safe on our streets. Cycling has increased hugely since the original guidance came out and it‘s not an adequate solution if you want to make our streets more sustainable and safer for those more vulnerable people, both pedestrians and cyclists.EDDIE MAIR: Roger Geffen what do you think of what the minister said?ROGER GEFFEN: Firstly let me agree with one point Tony just made which is that the main solution should be to create safe conditions for people of all ages and backgrounds to be able to cycle safely and law abidingly on the roads. People should not feel they have to make the choice between what is safe and what is legal. On the other hand I do think that the guidance does make sense. I think anyone would accept that there is a distinction to be made between cycling in a way that endangers or intimidates pedestrians, in which case they should feel the full force of the law, and where people are actually cycling on the pavement to avoid danger and are not causing it. At that point I think one would accept that it is not police priority to be enforcing the law. What we do believe though is in that situation one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course. We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but fixes it too, by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.EDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong?TONY ARMSTRONG: There are sanctions that are reasonable as Roger said, but it doesn’t solve the central point. We are saying there is no reasonable behaviour that doesn’t intimidate pedestrians. You can’t behave in a way that respects pedestrians even if you are feeling respectful and try to do your best to avoid cycling on the pavement.EDDIE MAIR: I’m looking at a tweet from Paul ……. to this programme ……….. he says that this works fine in Japan where people cycle on the pavement. Is that true?ROGER GEFFEN: That is correct. It is not a solution we would advocate. I do think that Tony has an entirely fair point that cyclists and pedestrians should not be put in conflict because we can’t work out how to create fair conditions whereby people are given their own space on the road. That is the right answer, along with lower speed limits; 20mph should be the norm in urban streets. We should be creating safe conditions so that people are not faced with the choice between what is safe and what is legal. I would agree with Tony on that. I do think though that there are some situations where you have got a busy main road and an empty pavement where if you were to then take enforcement action against that cyclist, particularly if you were talking about a pensioner in the situation, then I do think it would be reasonable for the police to exercise some discretion and I think on that basis we would agree with the minister’s position.EDDIE MAIR: Thank you both. Tony Armstrong from Living Streets and Roger Geffen from CTC.                                      ==============================================FOOTNOTE: LIVING STREETS is also campaigning for ‘Time to cross’ – seehttp://e-activist.com/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=1719&ea.campaign.id=23733&ea.tracking.id=hphttp://www.livingstreets.org.uk/blog-post-by-cutting-green-man-time-tfl-is-putting-cars-before-people==============================================THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESEaling’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk  Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk  Tel: 020 3054 0293 The Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime (MOPAC) http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/about-mopacThe Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is Stephen Greenhalgh. http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/about-mopac/the-deputy-mayor-for-policing-and-crime enquiries@mopac.london.gov.uk or write to: Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime 2nd Floor, City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA Tel: (020) 7983 6532 London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk  Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk  Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk  Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Council Leader: Julian Bell mailto julian.bell@ealing.gov.uk BIKEABILITY: http://bikeability.dft.gov.uk/ CYCLE TRAINING PROVIDER: Cycle Training UK  http://www.cycletraining.co.uk/index.php?pg=2

Tony Purton ● 4428d0 Comments ● 4428d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 7

Wednesday, January 15, 2014                 http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streetsLiving Streets’ comment in response to ongoing debate around responsible pavement cycling.Living Streets’ Chief Executive, Tony Armstrong, said: "Pedestrians and cyclists share many concerns on our streets, not least a woeful lack of priority and funding from Government to make cycling and walking much safer. Living Streets campaigns on many issues, such as 20 mph speed limits and improved street design, which would benefit and enhance the safety of both groups of road users. "However, there is no benefit in enhancing the safety of one vulnerable road user to the detriment of another, when what we need is a concerted effort to reduce harm from collisions with motorised traffic."We know from our supporters that many people feel threatened and unsafe by pavement cycling, particularly those who are more vulnerable such as disabled people, and people with sight or hearing impairments. “Pavement cycling is illegal and Living Streets will continue to vigorously campaign to ensure anti-social and illegal behaviour is not tolerated."In 2012, 51% of fatalities on London’s streets were pedestrians and nationally 16 pedestrians are killed or seriously injured every day. They are far and away the most vulnerable road users and Living Streets will continue to campaign for measures to allow us all to walk our streets as safely as possible.”For any media enquiries, please contact the Living Streets press office on 020 7377 4914, or email info@livingstreets.org.uk.For any out of office hours enquiries, please call 07545 209865.LISTEN TO THE BBC's "Radio 4 PM" INTERVIEW with Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen  of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) on 17th January: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 mins – or read the full transcript at PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 8

Tony Purton ● 4458d1 Comments ● 4429d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

LETTER BY PAUL BOATENG HOME OFFICE MINISTER July 1999 RE fixed penalty fines for pavement cycling                                             see copy at: http://www.ctc.org.uk/news/goodwill-reiterates-footway-cycling-guidancePAUL BOATENG MP                                                      HOME OFFICEQUEEN ANNE’S GATELONDON SW1H 9ATTel:0171 273 4597Fax: 0171 273 40909 July 1999Ben Bradshaw MPHouse of CommonsLondonSW1A 0AAYou wrote to me on 27 June about your concerns over the introduction of a fixed penalty for the offence of cycling on the pavement. We met to discuss this issue on 30 June, and I am hoping to be able to attend a meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group on 13 July or soon thereafter, when the issue can be further discussed. In the meantime, I think it would be helpful to set out the precise position on the fixed penalty offence as there has been some mis-reporting of it.The fixed penalty for cycling on the pavement is one of seven offences which are being added to the fixed penalty system. The others concern overtaking on a pedestrian crossing (three offences), failing to fixed (sic) a regulation registration mark (number plate) to a vehicle. Driving on the footway and carrying more than one person on a pedal cycle which was constructed to carry one person. These are all existing offences, and in adding them to the list of fixed penalty offences we are not singling out cycling on the pavement for any unique or special attention. The fixed penalty system already applies to a number of cycling offences such as cycling without lights and contravening a traffic sign. The measure is certainly not anti-cycling. As you will know from your contacts with Ministers at DETR, the Government wishes to promote cycling and those Ministers are also concerned, like us, with irresponsible cycling which cannot be condoned.The proposal for the new fixed penalty offences were originally put to us by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO and were subject to public consultation in July 1996. Administrative and other difficulties have badly delayed the introduction of the Fixed Penalty Order, but I am not in any doubt on the merits of introducing it in England and Wales. As you will see from the Order, the two cycling offences will not be added to the fixed penalty system in Scotland as a different view has been taken of the problem there. But the public correspondence the Home Office has received over the last year to January 1999 about cycling on the pavement shows that 137 correspondents were in favour of introducing the fixed penalty, whilst 30 were against it.Similarly, of 45 letters received from Members of Parliament, 35 were in favour and 10 against it. The prosecutions for cycling on the pavement in England and Wales have risen from 314 in 1995 to 648 in 1997 – the last year for which we currently have figures. Convictions have risen from 282 to 594 over that same period. I believe there is a genuine concern about inconsiderate cycling on the pavement in England and Wales and this particularly affects the elderly and disabled.I know that Alun Michael discussed this informally with some members of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group on 19 March last year. I am sure he gave careful considerationto the Group’s concerns, but I know that he wrote to you subsequently on 31 March last year maintaining his view that the fixed penalty for the offence should be introduced. I hope to be able to discuss the issue with the Group myself on 13 July or soon thereafter.I have stressed that this issue is about inconsiderate cycling. The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of the traffic, and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. This is not a clamp down on responsible cycling, and I know the police service too do not see it in that way. It has also b een suggested that young children will be affected. That is not so as the fixed penalty system can only be used for those aged 16 and over. A further misconception has been the idea that the police will b e able to impose an “on the spot” fine. Fixed penalties are nor “on the spot” fines. The recipient of a fixed penalty notice has 28 days in which either to pay the penalty and thereby discharge his or her liability to conviction or to request a court hearing if they wish to dispute the matter. I should also add that the use of the fixed penalty system for this type of offence is not new. A fixed penalty for cycling in prohibited areas can already be issued in some force areas where the local authority has introduced bylaws, for example in pedestrian precincts.Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle in the rfoad. This is one reason why the offence is most commonly enforced by verbal warnings rather than by prosecution. Sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required. The aim of providing the option to issue a fixed penalty notice (currently £20) is so that the police, in appropriate circumstances, may take simple and effective visible action which is stronger than a verbal warning but fall short of prosecution. The police service has many competing priorities to meet and I have absolutely no reason to believe that the introduction of a fixed penalty for cycling on the pavement will lead to a widespread shift of priorities into enforcing the offence. As I have already indicated, the service does not see the issue in that way but the fixed penalty will allow them to deal more simply and directly with particular local problems as and when they arise.I recognise that there are still concerns about how the fixed penalty will be used, and I know that ACPO are keen to dispel any concern that the police will use this power indiscriminately and without due regard to the circumstances, Before the offence is introduced we and ACPO intend to offer reassurance on this point by issuing a public statement on it.I note your particular concerns ab out other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that the issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement. Nevertheless I hope this letter is helpful in clarifying the details of what is proposed. I hope it will be possible to meet you and colleagues on 13 July or soon thereafter when I hope I shall be able to reassure you further on the issues.I am copying this letter to Glenda Jackson at DETR.PAUL BOATENG

Tony Purton ● 4459d2 Comments ● 4429d

Any animal lovers who can help?

Three weeks on Saturday (on 8 March) there will be demonstrations across the EU against the treatment of dogs in Romania. The aim is to force our governments to put pressure on Romania to stop the cruelty and torture. I am organising the London protest with a friend.In case you don't know, a law was recently passed in Romania allowing for the 'eradication' of all stray dogs, of which there are hundreds of thousands. Dogs - well, dead dogs - are worth a lot of money in a system that is corrupt from the top down, and it's our (EU) money that is being used to line pockets and buy new 4x4s. Many of the general public in Romania have enthusiastically joined in with the 'eradication', and dogs are having their heads smashed in, their legs cut off, being deliberately run over and left to die in agony, being put in crates with a dozen others and dumped on a rubbish tip to starve to death ...The law allows for public shelters to keep the dogs for 14 days in case they are claimed - but because most of them will be killed on day 14 officials consider it a waste of money to give the dogs food or even water. After the 14 days, the dogs are not put down humanely - the money received to buy anaesthesia can be pocketed and the dogs have their heads kicked in, or smashed with a shovel, or they are injected with antifreeze or bleach. An agonizing death, but so much cheaper! Cheaper still, many of them are trapped by snowfall in the makeshift shelters - they freeze or suffocate.This is not an anti-Romanian rant. Because of the crisis I have met many wonderful Romanians who are appalled by what is being carried on in their name. But they need help. Can you help us raise funds to get the dogs out of the public shelters, come on our demonstrations, send blankets or maybe even foster or adopt a dog from Romania? I've met many 'Rommie rescues' and they are just lovely, normal dogs.If you want to find out more, try an internet search - but, beware, the photos are graphic and they will shock and haunt you. Or you can pm me, and I can tell you more and how you can help.Thank you for reading.

Lynn Clements ● 4436d1 Comments ● 4436d

TFL oppose extending bus routes when Ealing Hospital shuts

What additional hospital bus routes do we need (when the Ealing Hospital services are reduced)?There is a TFL appendix which will be discussed at a Town Hall meeting open to the public on  Tuesday 11 February at 6.00 p.m. in the Queens Hall. .Council say This is likely to be a very sensitive and important issue for many residents. Typical of the relevant department, nothing is shown on the front page of the Council website, nor anywhere in the Gazette.TFL sayThe Travel Analysis shows that about an estimated 2,260 would travel from Central Middlesex Hospital and 41,280 would travel from Ealing Hospital to West Middlesex Hospital annually – a total of 43,540 patients per year or about 174 per weekday, which equates to 350 daily trips assuming 2-way journeys.To extend say the E8 or E2 service to West Middlesex Hospital (cost £550-£700K) they sayFor one of these extensions to meet our current threshold for implementation it would require at least 1,250 additional trips per weekday.In other words for the numerically challenged much, much more than 350 trips per day.They conclude Given the current provision of bus services and the predicted number of trips to West Middlesex Hospital, the existing network is adequate to cater for additional demand to the hospital. (W.Mid).Also no other routes will be extended.So the country save billions on hospital reorganisation and TFL gets away scot free on account of their ridiculously high criteria for new bus routes, for which the authorities will make no special exception.TFL must be laughing their socks off as this meeting will be poorly attended due to the projected underground strike which starts this Tuesday at 9.00p.m. Full reference herehttp://ealing.cmis.uk.com/Ealing/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=zPFiS1JI2KpKuSSW7hRrl7vr5g67%2bz8PrjD4kKa08b68mXASJOJ3pw%3d%3d&rUzwRPf%2bZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3d%3d=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2fLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3d%3d&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&kCx1AnS9%2fpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2bAJvYtyA%3d%3d=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&FgPlIEJYlotS%2bYGoBi5olA%3d%3d=NHdURQburHA%3d&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3d

George Knox ● 4439d1 Comments ● 4439d

Puns for Educated Minds

How does Moses make his tea? Hebrews it....Venison for dinner again? Oh deer!A cartoonist was found dead in his home. Details are sketchy.I used to be a banker, but then I lost interest.Haunted French pancakes give me the crepes.England has no kidney bank, but it does have a Liverpool.I tried to catch some fog, but I mist.They told me I had type-A blood, but it was a Type-O.I changed my iPod's name to Titanic. It's syncing now.Jokes about German sausages are the wurst.I know a guy who's addicted to brake fluid, but he says he can stop any time.I stayed up all night to see where the sun went, and then it dawned on me.This girl said she recognized me from the vegetarian club, but I'd never met herbivore.When chemists die, apparently they barium.I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. I just can't put it down.I did a theatrical performance about puns. It was a play on words.I didn't like my beard at first. Then it grew on me.Did you hear about the cross-eyed teacher who lost her job because she couldn't control her pupils?When you get a bladder infection you know urine trouble.Broken pencils are pretty much pointless.What do you call a dinosaur with an extensive vocabulary? A thesaurus.I dropped out of the Communism class because of lousy Marx.All the toilets in New York's police stations have been stolen. As of now, it appears the police have nothing to go on.I got a job at a bakery because I kneaded dough.Velcro - what a rip off!

Graham Weeks ● 4440d4 Comments ● 4440d

My story.. Someone somewhere must remember him or taxi rank or clubs xxxx

Find my dadHere is my story :-(I was born Mandy Ann Millsom 01/04/1969.Birth mothers name Linda olive Millsom 11/11/50She is now known as Linda Maidment and lives in Stevenage xxxxxxxxShe has a total memory block and cannot remember ANYTHING at all so no point contacting her.In 1969 my father, Christopher would have been 23/24yrs old. He was never told Linda was pregnant.In 1969 he worked at the wimpy in ealing as a chef.This went in the Ealing gazette:Do you remember a Christopher or Christos who worked in West Ealing?A mum of four, who was adopted at birth, is desperate to find her real father who worked in Ealing in 1969.Bev Gauntlett, 43, from Surrey,is asking for help from anyone who might have been in West Ealing or Shepherd’s Bush in the 1960’s and knew a Christoper or Christos who worked at the Wimpy close to the Lido junction.She says: ” In my adoption file it describes him as Greek Cypriot, 5″ 6 dark straight hair, dark brown eyes, olive complexion, good looking. His name is Christopher or Christos. In 1969 he was 24yrs old and worked as a chef at the wimpy bar, Ealing ( Lido junction). Apparently he was a very nice man, liked a joke and always smiling. He had an older brother and they both did some casual driving too. Christopher or Christos apparently had a room in the Shepherd’s Bush area. He met my mother and they had a relationship for about 6 months.”Bev says she discovered she had been adopted by accident and her birth mother Linda Olive Millsom had never told her father that she was pregnant.” My dad has 4 beautiful granddaughters that he also doesn’t know about.. It’s so sad. If anyone can remember hanging out in those days or even knew any of his friends or even the first letter of his surname would be fantastic..I so desperately want to find my dad, my father, my roots.”If you think can help please contact Bev via euGreeka or directly by email.Additional info:The owners of the wimpy back in 1969 have a son called "Ali" his number is xxxxxxx and was going to find out who his parents sold the wimpy to next as they may remember him.Another lady contacted me and said " Ok I lost all contact with Chris a couple years ago the only thing I can suggest that you call the salon he used to own, its now called Class".More infoHi In 1969 he was 24yrs old.he had a room in the shepherds bush area.dont know his older brothers name but they both did some casual driving. My father is of Greek orodox. He played card games in a Greek club.his brother was a taxi driver. I think my birth mother stayed at the YMCA for women Another lady told me this:She knows of him from years ago and think he lives and eats in wetstone north london xAnother old Greek man told me that a friend of his used to manage a taxi firm way back then and said that a Greek guy christos drove for them for about a month an that also a lady called Linda used to answer the phones.think he lives and eats in wetstone north london now x

Bev Gauntlett ● 4472d2 Comments ● 4443d

New training thread!! (Pictures)

Gosh, haven't we done well! Pictures galore!!Just remember we didn't have a clue a few months ago?But thanks to our professors..we've made progrerss.Now we've learnt how to post pictures from cyberspace..whether or not we are using IE (Internet Explorer) or some other Browser like MF (Mozilla Firebox) We have learnt how to use the img scr= (plus the two vv thingies)...which is like a carrier for transferring pictures from one place to another.I've described in my amateurish way to some people what BROWSERS are.Imagine you are moving into a new house..I tell them..the kitchen is just a shell..and you need to install a ready-made kit like MFI..or JOHN Lewis, or Smallbone..which will each have different facilities like dual taps, washer/dryer combined, one kit may have a mangle!! and another might have a  spin dryer. In the same way Internet Explorer is a popular USA kit...but an alternative is Mozilla Firebox (born out of Netscape and AOL??). I believe that there is one called Opera too. They all seem to have different features..and interestingly Peter has just had installed MF so it seems..and on another thread he compliments it's (MF's)  speed. There are other goodies too.Perhaps this subject can be discussed on Peter'e new Topic/thread.So..in seaching Cyberspace....we find pictures we like or need...do a right click etc etc and look for the jpg at the end of the picture address(THE URL)...and copy and taste onto the reply screen..and add the img src= etc.The most valuable addition to these feats though..has been the possibility of using one "own" picture..the ones you have perhaps downloaded from your camera onto MY PICTURES..or that you have transferred from cyberspace to your MY PICTURES. Several of us are now using the Internet Hosting facility IMGHOSTINGwhich enables one to "UPLOAD" any picture onto your own PRIVATE GALLERY(album)..before despatching the pictures either to this Forum ..or to e-bay etc etc.  IMGHOSTING is free up to point..after which you pay £7? for 6 months.There are other hosting services too..including fotopic etc.I've found that its necessary to reduce the size of some of the photos in MY PICTURES.  I locate the picture and bring it up on screen..and by right-clicking I find what size it is. Many from my Canon Ixus 500 camera..are shown to be 1800 x900 for example. With the Photo shop I have..I go to VIEW, click RESIZE, and them reduced to size by pressing  on an arrow. When the size reaches say 750 x ?..I save it..and then use it to post to IMG HOSTING..who only accept these modest sizes. But the Waitrose picture came out ok ..didn't it..or was it still too large!Graham wanted help with his APPLE MAC computer  ..so maybe someone can give him advice about what he has to do to post Pictures...and become a PP(Picture Poster)!Anyone else need help with Picture postings..or any questions?

Jim Lawes ● 7557d25 Comments ● 4445d

World Famous Expert on Suburbia Sir Peter Hall to speak on Saturday at Ealing Central Library

Hi there, just wanted to draw your attention to an event this Saturday in Ealing Central Library. Hope this works as a hyperlink:http://bloomsburyhistory.typepad.com/bloomsbury-history/2014/01/local-history-conference-suburbia-in-west-london-ealing-uk.htmlOtherwise click on "events" to the right. More info: A local history conference on the subject of suburbia with particular reference  to west London will take place this Saturday 25th January at Ealing Central Library from 2.30. A series of talks will be delivered by speakers including Ealing borough historian Jonathan Oates, the Sociology Lecturer and former Deputy Mayoress of Ealing Dr Rupa Huq and the eminent academic and previous government advisor on urbanism and planning Sir Professor Peter Hall. Professor Hall, author of some 40 books will be discussing his latest “Good Cities, Better Lives” and Dr Huq will draw on her recent two titles "On the Edge" and "Making Sense of Suburbia Through Popular Culture". Both are Ealing residents. Huq will argue that the true soul of the nation now resides in suburbia and that the tourist attractions of Buckingham Palace, Stratford on Avon and Stonehenge tell us nothing about contemporary British society whereas Ealing is a microcosm of it. Other topics to be probed include the status of Bedford Park, whether the title "Queen of the Suburbs" for Ealing is justified and why riots came to Ealing in 2011. All are welcome.To book call 020 8 825 9278 or 0203 700 1053 or email ealing.reading@carillionservies.co.uk Admission is £4Hope to see you there, do spread the word

Rupa Huq ● 4457d4 Comments ● 4447d

CYCLING TEST A 'SENSIBLE' IDEA

Letters: Ealing Gazette Friday 24 January 2014ROAD TESTS FOR CYCLISTSWhat commentators [Colin Lomas 17 January and others] either forget, or are not aware of, is that cycling on the pavement was made a fixed penalty offence by Home Office Minister of State Paul Boateng in 1999 to help the police enforce Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act. DfT minister Robert Goodwill has just reissued those 1999 guidelines.The issues were discussed on Radio 4’s PM programme last Friday 17 January [http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 mins] between Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC). Roger Geffen speaking for cyclists said “…….. one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course"."We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but but fixes it too by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.”Seen in this light, Jean Orman’s idea [letters 10 January] that cyclists should be required to take a test before they ride on the roads sounds eminently sensible. Because of confusion in the public mind, a police and local authority publicity/poster campaign reminding the population at large that the ‘default’ law is that pavement cycling is illegal, unless signposted otherwise [This] would go a long way to help the police enforce the law against it by making sure that those who do it do so knowingly (or ‘willingly’) as the law says. Tony Purton Ealing                    ==================================NOTE: The full transcript of the BBC Radio 4PM interview referred to above can be read under post PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 8The full text of Home Office Minister's July 1999 'guidance' letter can be read under post PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

Tony Purton ● 4454d17 Comments ● 4451d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 8

The transcript of BBC Radio 4 PM’s interview with Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) on 17th January 17.30:http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 minsPresenter: Eddie MairMAIR:  The UK’s minister for cycling wants cyclists to use the pavements. Well, to be precise, Robert Goodwill says cyclists should not be fined for mounting the pavement if they are escaping a dangerous section of road. In an e-mail to a cycling campaigner the minister said that discretion should be exercised QUOTE “When a cyclist is using the pavement alongside a dangerous section of road by the speed of the traffic.” He said enforcement was up to the police but he reiterated guidance from 1999 when fixed penalties for cycling on pavements were introduced. It states that the goal was not to penalise responsible cyclists. Robert Goodwill said “Cyclists must be mindful not to put pedestrians at risk.”Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of the Living Streets a charity that represents pedestrians. Roger Geffen Policy Director of the cycling charity CTCEDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong, what do you think of what the cycling minister has said?TONY ARMSTRONG: Well we’re disappointed in this. We were opposed to the original guidance when it came out because we don’t believe there is a happy compromise were a cyclist can responsibly cycle on the pavement. Many pedestrians value that safe haven status the pavements give them, particularly older people and people with disabilities. So saying that because we have failed to make the roads safe for cyclists we should create another problem by creating intimidation for pedestrians, we think that is not the right solution.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever cycled?TONY ARMSTRONG: I cycle every day. I cycle in London every day and I know exactly how unsafe and fearful it can be.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever felt on a stretch of road where you feel in danger that if you could just get on the pavement for a moment that would be a good thing?TONY ARMSTRONG: Yeah absolutely. And what we’re saying is that if someone is in immediate danger of being in a collision or in immediate threat then get on the pavement. All the pedestrians that are on that pavement would absolutely be fine with that. We are not talking about where people are in immediate danger. The problem is when lots of people feel nervous, and who’s to define what a dangerous road is, because if you feel nervous and if you feel fearful about cycling then you just think ‘Oh, the minister has put this guidance out – I’ll just cycle on the pavements’; and many people are already using the pavements because they don’t feel particularly safe on our streets. Cycling has increased hugely since the original guidance came out and it‘s not an adequate solution if you want to make our streets more sustainable and safer for those more vulnerable people, both pedestrians and cyclists.EDDIE MAIR: Roger Geffen what do you think of what the minister said?ROGER GEFFEN: Firstly let me agree with one point Tony just made which is that the main solution should be to create safe conditions for       people of all ages and backgrounds to be able to cycle safely and law abidingly on the roads. People should not feel they have to make the choice between what is safe and what is legal. On the other hand I do think that the guidance does make sense. I think anyone would accept that there is a distinction to be made between cycling in a way that endangers or intimidates pedestrians, in which case they should feel the full force of the law, and where people are actually cycling on the pavement to avoid danger and are not causing it. At that point I think one would accept that it is not police priority to be enforcing the law. What we do believe though is in that situation one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course. We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but fixes it too, by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.EDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong?TONY ARMSTRONG: There are sanctions that are reasonable as Roger said, but it doesn’t solve the central point. We are saying there is no reasonable behaviour that doesn’t intimidate pedestrians. You can’t behave in a way that respects pedestrians even if you are feeling respectful and try to do your best to avoid cycling on the pavement.EDDIE MAIR: I’m looking at a tweet from Paul ……. to this programme ……….. he says that this works fine in Japan where people cycle on the pavement. Is that true?ROGER GEFFEN: That is correct. It is not a solution we would advocate. I do think that Tony has an entirely fair point that cyclists and pedestrians should not be put in conflict because we can’t work out how to create fair conditions whereby people are given their own space on the road. That is the right answer, along with lower speed limits; 20mph should be the norm in urban streets. We should be creating safe conditions so that people are not faced with the choice between what is safe and what is legal. I would agree with Tony on that. I do think though that there are some situations where you have got a busy main road and an empty pavement where if you were to then take enforcement action against that cyclist, particularly if you were talking about a pensioner in the situation, then I do think it would be reasonable for the police to exercise some discretion and I think on that basis we would agree with the minister’s position.EDDIE MAIR: Thank you both.  Tony Armstrong from Living Streets and Roger Geffen from CTC.===================================================================FOOTNOTE: Extracts from Community Forum Code of Conduct“Avoid disruptive activity online, such as persistent off-topic comments and postings or statements that incite others to ……………… participate in illegal activities. “This is not a chat-site.

Tony Purton ● 4458d4 Comments ● 4457d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 5

To many pedestrians last Friday’s newspaper headlines “Minister: Let cyclists ride on pavement” will be seen as a body blow to pedestrian safety. For cycling groups it will undoubtedly be hailed as a ‘freedom charter to ride on the pavements’. There is, however, more to it than that..DfT minister Robert Goodwill was responding to complaints from cycling campaigners that during their recent ‘Operation Safeway’ blitz on road safety in London, the police have been ‘over-zealous’ in issuing fines every time cyclists were spotted riding on the pavement. All Robert Goodwill has done is to reiterate the guidance issued by Labour Home Office minister Paul Boateng in 1999 when pavement cycling was made a fixed penalty offence after concerns were expressed that the police were turning a blind eye to those cycling on the footpath - prosecutions in the ten years 1984 to 1994 had declined significantly. “The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required.” At least Robert Goodwill acknowledges that pavement cycling is illegal. That is a great leap forward from 2009 when the DfT’s top civil servant Robert Devereux told the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee during a hearing on ‘Improving road safety for pedestrians and cyclists in Great Britain’ that he thought pavement cycling was legal - until he checked with his support staff sitting next to him and had to admit he was wrong! See http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/665/9061004.htm Q42 - Q47 49th Report 2008–09.FOR THE FULL TEXT OF PAUL BOATENG’S 1999 GUIDANCE SEE: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

Tony Purton ● 4459d3 Comments ● 4458d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 4

I am grateful to Ben Owen, Al Stuart, Paul James and Nigel Brooks for their continued intemperate comments on my purely factual posts about the illegality of pavement cycling PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 3. Each time they whinge about the unfairness of life as seen from the saddle of a bicycle they bring the topic back up to the top of the list, increasing the readership of my original posts and exposing their own intolerant attitude to us pedestrian PLEBS!.THERE ARE NO LAWS ABOUT PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOUR because walking is a fundamental means of human movement carried out at unthreatening speeds. It is the speed of mechanically assisted human movement which creates danger, is confined to the roads, and is controlled by the traffic laws. EVEN ‘JAYWALKING’ IS NOT ILLEGAL IN THIS COUNTRY! See these extracts from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaywalking“The United Kingdom does not formally describe priority regulations for drivers and pedestrians at road junctions or other locations, except with respect to marked Zebra, Pelican, and Puffin crossings, where motorists are required to give way to pedestrians under defined conditions. Elsewhere, the Highway Code relies on the pedestrian making their own judgement on whether it is safe to cross based on the Green Cross Code. If the pedestrian's judgement was correct then no evasive re-action should be required by any drivers, but drivers [including cyclists] are expected to avoid hazards and are examined on their ability to do so during the Hazard Perception Test.” “The term "jaywalking" is rarely used, and there is no law preventing jaywalking as such. In England, Wales and Scotland it is legal to cross all roads except motorways (where pedestrians and slow vehicles are not permitted), and roads with the "No Pedestrians" sign displayed. The Highway Code contains additional rules for crossing a road safely, but these are recommendations and not legally enforceable, although as with other advisory parts of the Highway Code compliance or otherwise can be used to establish liability in civil law proceedings such as insurance claims.” “When crossing a road, pedestrians are advised to wait until it is safe to cross. Vehicles have priority when crossing a road, although, if a pedestrian is crossing the road across a side street where a car is about to turn, vehicles should give way to the pedestrian. This is demonstrated in the Highway Code [Rule 170].] In UK schools children are taught to cross roads safely through the Green Cross Code. British children are taught to "Stop, Look, Listen and Think" before crossing a road, as demonstrated in the Arrive Alive campaign.”“Zebra crossings are points where pedestrians can cross with the right of way. Traffic [including bicycles!] should [MUST Highway Code Rule 195] stop at such points for pedestrians.” AND THIS IS WHAT THE HIGHWAY CODE SAYS TO VEHICLE DRIVERS/RIDERS [INCLUDING CYCLISTS!] about ‘Road users requiring extra care’ 205 There is a risk of pedestrians, especially children, stepping unexpectedly into the road. You should drive with the safety of children in mind at a speed suitable for the conditions.206 Drive carefully and slowly when• in crowded shopping streets, Home Zones and Quiet Lanes (see Rule 218) or residential areas • driving past bus and tram stops; pedestrians may emerge suddenly into the road • passing parked vehicles, especially ice cream vans; children are more interested in ice cream than traffic and may run into the road unexpectedly • needing to cross a pavement or cycle track; for example, to reach or leave a driveway. Give way to pedestrians and cyclists on the pavement • reversing into a side road; look all around the vehicle and give way to any pedestrians who may be crossing the road • turning at road junctions; give way to pedestrians who are already crossing the road into which you are turning • the pavement is closed due to street repairs and pedestrians are directed to use the road • approaching pedestrians on narrow rural roads without a footway or footpath. Always slow down and be prepared to stop if necessary, giving them plenty of room as you drive past. 207 Particularly vulnerable pedestrians. These include:• children and older pedestrians who may not be able to judge your speed and could step into the road in front of you. At 40 mph (64 km/h) your vehicle will probably kill any pedestrians it hits. At 20 mph (32 km/h) there is only a 1 in 20 chance of the pedestrian being killed. So kill your speed • older pedestrians who may need more time to cross the road. Be patient and allow them to cross in their own time. Do not hurry them by revving your engine or edging forward • people with disabilities. People with hearing impairments may not be aware of your vehicle approaching. Those with walking difficulties require more time • blind or partially sighted people, who may be carrying a white cane using a guide dog. They may not be able to see you approaching • deafblind people who may be carrying a white cane with a red band or using a dog with a red and white harness. They may not see or hear instructions or signals.208 Near schools. Drive slowly and be particularly aware of young cyclists and pedestrians. In some places, there may be a flashing amber signal below the ‘School’ warning sign which tells you that there may be children crossing the road ahead. Drive very slowly until you are clear of the area.209 Drive carefully and slowly when passing a stationary bus showing a ‘School Bus’ sign (download ‘Vehicle markings’ (PDF, 537KB)) as children may be getting on or off.210 You MUST stop when a school crossing patrol shows a ‘Stop for children’ sign (download ‘Signals by authorised persons’ (PDF, 123KB) and ‘Traffic signs’ (PDF, 486KB)).Law RTRA sect 28

Tony Purton ● 4464d20 Comments ● 4460d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 3

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 3THE HOME OFFICE ADVICE quoted by Paul James was published by Labour Home Office minister Paul Boateng in 2006 and has been overtaken by events. There has been a dynamic to increase the use of bicycles, boosted by last year’s Olympic Games and heavily promoted by the government as a new ‘green’ idea. IN 2009 THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE in its report ‘Improving road safety for pedestrians and cyclists in Great Britain’ said: 4. “Some cyclists are perceived to behave irresponsibly, such as riding on pavements and disregarding red traffic signals, thereby posing a danger to themselves and making other road users including elderly pedestrians feel unsafe”5.  There appears to be a lack of understanding amongst the public and some police about the legal requirements for cyclists, including, for example, whether it is illegal to cycle on a pavement. The Department confirmed that it was illegal and undertook to consult its police liaison officer about how it might draw this to the attention of police forces across the country. Legislation also requires new bicycles to be fitted with bells but it is not illegal, subsequently, to remove them. The Department agreed that it could devise new rules to constrain irresponsible cyclists but said that it would need to be satisfied that the police could enforce them. Enforcing cycling offences was typically not high on the agenda of most police forces due to competing demands on their time.Robert Devereux, Permanent Under-secretary of the DfT, giving evidence to the Committee said he did not think pavement cycling was illegal – but when pressed by Geraldine Smith MP confirmed that it was, which seemed to come as a surprise to him. Read the evidence for yourself http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/665/9061004.htm Q42  Geraldine Smith: Can you tell me, first of all: is it illegal to cycle on pavements?   Mr Devereux: No, I do not think so. I will just check that. I have a feeling that it is a Highway Code recommendation not to do it rather than it being actually against the law. Mr Devereux: Sorry, I have just checked this and it is illegal to be on the pavement. That being the case, there is no reason why a policeman should not—   Q45  Geraldine Smith: It is illegal? Do the Department for Transport make that clear to the police because a police superintendent was at this forum with me and he said that it was legal to cycle on pavements, so, if you are confirming that, I can go back and tell him that it is actually illegal.  Mr Devereux: It is page 22 of the Highway Code in red, which means it is illegal, "You must not cycle on the pavement".  Q46  Geraldine Smith: Excellent! I am very pleased about that. I shall go back and tell him.   Mr Devereux: It is Rule 64. In terms of whether or not people are aware of it, and you have clearly caught me out, I was not expecting quite so many anti-cyclist questions, so forgive me, we have within the Department a police liaison officer and I will go back and make sure that he actually makes that clear to the police  Q47  Geraldine Smith: Yes, if you would, because I was quite surprised at these forums that it came up, not just at one, but at every one of them, as an area which people were really concerned about, and I did expect it a bit, but I think there is a feeling that people in authority do not take it seriously enough. As I say, the superintendent that I was with said, "No, it is legal to cycle on the pavement, it is just illegal if it is irresponsible cycling", and that is quite different from what you have said, so maybe there should be an instruction going out to every police force in the country making the position clear to people.   Mr Devereux: I will ask the liaison officer to do something appropriate to make sure it is clear. CURRENT DfT AND HOME OFFICE MINISTERS AND THE POLICE are in no doubt that pavement cycling is illegal as they have confirmed to me personally and whose words I have published.  IN HIS ‘VISION FOR CYCLING IN LONDON’ Mayor Boris Johnson says:“We will act more vigourously against cyclist violations, such as riding on the pavement” (page 23)“The Metropolitan and City of London Police have a vital job in safety, security and enforcement against antisocial cyclist behaviour” (page 28)“We recognise the real problem of antisocial cycling” (page 31)“We will increase enforcement action against illegal cyclist behaviour” (page 31)THE CYCLIST LOBBY ZEROS IN ON THIS STATEMENT IN THE ‘VISION’“One of the best ways of stopping people cycling on the pavement is to give them better places to cycle on the road” (page 33) – which is simply a repetition of the usual excuse made by cyclists for riding on the pavement ‘for their own safety’ and reflects the half-hearted way in which cycling policy is being implemented.GET BRITAIN CYCLING – by the All-party Parliamentary Cycling Group says:“ We need to train cyclists and drivers alike to travel legally and safely.”http://allpartycycling.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/get-britain-cycling1.pdf  A GRIMBY MAGISTRATE SAID: to a 29-year-old Grimsby man he fined £750 ‘cycling without consideration’ after hitting and injuring a five-year-old child while riding on the pavement, who claimed he was only cycling on the pavement because of the dangers of cycling on the road: "By not cycling on the road you put your own safety ahead of others, and the consequences of this could have been much worse. People have been killed by cyclists in similar incidents.“THE AUTHOR Is a life-time cyclist, motorcyclist, motorist and walker whose main hobby is flying extensively in the UK and Europe as a private pilot. In the 1970s and 80s I cycled daily to work from Ealing to Tottenham Court Road. At the age of 78 I find no need to use a bike (which I still have), preferring to walk and use public transport for local journeys. Pedestrian safety - my own - is now my major concern. I hope to achieve it by the time I reach the ‘walking stick’ stage. Two years ago I took the one day ‘Bikeability’ course on safe ‘on road’ cycling to see what it was like – it was good and I recommend it to all my OAP friends, some of whom have taken my advice.

Tony Purton ● 4545d18 Comments ● 4465d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 2

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 2DON’T JUST REPLY TO THIS POST – WRITE TO THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESThe four recent postings on pavement cycling seem to have attracted the usual hate-mail from cyclists claiming that everybody else is worse than they are so why pick on them. Some 17 individuals have registered 118 posts so far. 5 of the posters seem to be against pavement cycling. The rest make the usual excuses for it and (t)witter on about irrelevant issues. What I hope to do is encourage PEDESTRIANS to have their say by writing to the responsible authorities (listed below), as I have done, to press those authorities to enforce the long-standing law against pavement cycling. All the authorities agree that pavement cycling is illegal (see below) but do little to enforce the law. Cleveland Ward councillor John Popham has recently admitted to one correspondent (not me) that “cycling on the pavement….. is definitely getting worse.”In Bristol a campaign group has made a stand against pavement cycling following evidence videoed by pensioners – see http://road.cc/content/news/67162-pensioners-who-videoed-pavement-cyclists-bristol-are-now-campaigning-more-cycle. David Willingham, who represents Bishopston has asked new police commissioner Sue Mountstevens to crack down on the 'anti-social' antics of riders.If the government is encouraging people to walk more, they will do so on the pavements. If the government realises its stated aim to increase cycle use in the UK to 5 times its present volume over the next 12 years (from 2% of journeys in 2011 to 10% of all journeys in 2025) then the danger/nuisance of pavement cycling we experience today will soon increase beyond any tolerable bounds on more crowded pavements.Safety for cyclists on the roads is a matter for all road users (including cyclists) to resolve between them. The pavements are not a refuge for any of them. A default 20mph urban speed limit would reduce the speed differential between motor vehicles and cyclists. If cyclists want to be separated from motor vehicles they should lobby for exclusive cycle lanes. For Phillipa Bond - Re SIGNS: a clearly intelligible NO PAVEMENT CYCLING sign is simple and cheap to produce and display. Take the ubiquitous NO SMOKING sign, a red circle with a backward red slash across it, and put a bicycle in the middle in place of the smoking cigarette – and there you have it. Embossed with the Met Police and Ealing Council logos and bearing reference to Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act and Rule 64 of the Highway Code, such signs could be printed on self-adhesive A4 labels (6 or 8 to a page) and stuck on lamp-posts throughout the Borough. I have submitted such a design to both the Met Police and Ealing Council. The reaction of Ealing Council’s cycling guru Nick O’Donnell was: “we do not believe that the erection of what would have to be a mass of signs across the Borough on this matter is really (a) good spend of taxpayers money (b) in line with our policies on reducing street clutter and (c) likely to actively deter this activity to justify the spend”. Ealing Council has bid for £38.5 million of London Mayor Boris’s £100 million fund to improve facilities for cyclists. A few £ thousands spent on self-adhesive labels to protect pedestrians would hardly be missed, but the NO CYCLING signs would encourage pedestrians to exert their right in law to cycle-free pavements.Here are some of the official statements I have collected from the highest levels of the “responsible authorities” in the course of pursuing this issue. PARLIAMENTThere appears to be a lack of understanding amongst the public and some police about the legal requirements for cyclists, including, for example, whether it is illegal to cycle on a pavement. The Department confirmed that it was illegal and undertook to consult its police liaison officer about how it might draw this to the attention of police forces across the country.Enforcing cycling offences was typically not high on the agenda of most police forces due to competing demands on their time. Public Accounts Committee: Report on Cycling, October 2009MINISTERS“..cycling on the pavement ….. is an offence. Enforcement is a matter for the police.” Mike Penning, Transport Minister: letter Ref.MC/344 59 22 March 2012“Rule 64 of the Highway Code clearly states that you MUST NOT cycle on the pavement. The Code is essential reading for road users” Norman Baker, Transport Minister: Written PQ answer 353 DfT Ref.39439 10/12 17 April 2012“The way the police enforce the law ….. are matters for their professional judgement and discretion” Nick Herbert, Home Office Minister: Written PQ answer [103300] 19 April 2012METROPOLITAN POLICE“The impact and hazards caused by cycling on the pavement is [also] punishable by way of fixed penalty notice and we issued over 6,150 tickets for this offence last year.” Commander Adrian Hanstock Met Police: letter 14 May 2012“… there are no specific advisory campaigns advising the general public about cycling on the pavement”  Commander Adrian Hanstock Met Police: e-mail 20 May 2012 Police National Legal Database and DfT Police Liaison Newsletter September 2009Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 provides an offence of riding or driving on the footpath. It states: 72. If any person shall wilfully ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road, made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers; or shall wilfully lead or drive any horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, cattle or carriage of any description, or any truck or sledge, upon any such footpath or causeway or tether any horse, ass, mule, swine or cattle on any highway so as to suffer or permit the tethered animal to be thereon.Offence Wording: On **(..SPECIFY DATE..) at **(..SPECIFY TOWNSHIP..) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely **(..SPECIFY ROAD AND LOCATION..), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengersNOTES:(i) A footpath is part of a highway, if it is beside a road.(ii) The section only extends to the wilful obstructions specified.(iii) Proceeding may be instituted by anyone and is not confined exclusively to the Highway Authority.(iv) "Wilful" under this section means "purposely“The legislation makes no exceptions for small wheeled or children’s cycles. However, if any rider is under the age of criminal responsibility (10) they will not be guilty of the offence.Section 72 applies to the driving of  'a carriage of any description', which includes bicycles, tricycles , motor vehicles and trailers, as well as to certain animals.Local bye-laws may apply in relation to cycling in pedestrian precincts.EALING COUNCIL“I agree that adults cycling on pavements is not appropriate and illegal and as has been repeatedly explained to you something we are working on discouraging”. Nick O’Donnell Assistant Director Strategic Transport, London Borough of Ealing“cycling on the pavement….. is definitely getting worse.” CLEVELAND WARD COUNCILLOR John Popham HOW MUCH DOES A MOVING CYCLIST WEIGH?Any moving body has an energy potential far greater that it’s standing weight – known as Kinetic Energy. It is measured by the formula ½MV² where M=weight and V=speed.It is well understood that a 1 ton vehicle (a typical saloon car) traveling at 30mph has a Kinetic Energy potential of 450 tons, which is why it is almost certain to kill any pedestrian it hits at that speed. A cyclist traveling at 10mph will ‘weigh’ 50 times his own weight. At 15mph he will ‘weigh’ 112 times his own weight. That energy potential in collision with a pedestrian can do a great deal of damage, not to mention the ‘trauma’ of such a collision especially for the vulnerable elderly or infirm. A rugby full back blocking an attacking forward in full flight probably experiences the sort of collision that an unsuspecting pedestrian might suffer from a collision with a 10mph cyclist. PROTECTIVE CLOTHINGCyclists tend to wear helmets and some protective clothing in case they fall off their bikes.  Pedestrians do not dress to protect themselves from collision with cyclists or any other vehicles. They rely simply on avoiding them. THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESEaling’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293 London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk], responsible for implementing London Mayor Boris Johnson’s ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Ward Councillors:Councillor Isobel Grant     Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk                              Councillor John Popham   John.popham@ealing.gov.uk                             Councillor Greg Stafford   Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukEaling Conservative Action TeamRosa Popham      rpopham@btinternet.com                              Ian Proud        ianproud@ip-associates.demon.co.uk                                                                

Tony Purton ● 4545d8 Comments ● 4468d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANSThe ‘cycling lobby’ (including the CTC) insists on sharing the public pavements, uninvited, on the grounds that cyclists are no threat to pedestrians, that most pedestrians don’t mind, and it is safer for cyclists than riding on the roadways. The government’s Bikeability scheme promotes safer cycling on the roadways, acknowledging (but only in whispers) that pavement cycling is illegal. There are moves afoot to create a default 20mph speed limit in all urban areas which would reduce the speed differential between motor vehicles and cyclists thereby making the roads safer for all road users and easier for pedestrians to cross the roads. See http://www.20splentyforus.org.uk/its_time_for_20.htmTfL is said to be developing a ‘Pedestrian Safety Action Plan’. The Living Streets organisation http://www.livingstreets.co.uk   is involved in those discussions – contact Tom.Platt@living streets.co.uk . Hopefully the Plan will tackle the issue of pavement cycling.What does the ‘pedestrian lobby’ think? Why not tell the responsible authorities listed in the following letter, and raise the issue at the next Cleveland Ward meeting on Thursday 24October.WHO SHOULD STOP PAVEMENT CYCLING?(Unsigned letter to Ealing Gazette 23 August 2013)Reply to the editor Ealing Gazette on 23 August – not publishedThe simple answer is the Metropolitan Police. Pavement cycling is a crime under the 1835 Highways Act, as indicated in Rule 64 of the Highway Code. Pavement cycling incidents should be reported (preferably with photographic evidence) to Sgt James Ayling of Ealing’s Community Police Team [mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406] with copies to Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command [mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293]. Unfortunately the Metropolitan Police appear to regard pavement cycling as a ‘petty crime’ which they are content to ignore as a matter of policy in favour of chasing ‘real criminals’. Ealing’s own police officers are badly (or ‘defensively’) briefed on the issue as your correspondent has discovered.At Ealing Council the promotion of cycling in the borough is the responsibility of Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell [mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078]. There is an office dealing with cycling issues [mailto: cycling@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 5771]. However, Ealing Council refuses to make its social contribution to controlling pavement cycling by putting up signs indicating that it is illegal, or even mentioning the illegality of pavement cycling in any of its cycling-promotion literature. Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is Ealing’s Cabinet Member for Transport and Environment [mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656]London Mayor Boris Johnson’s recently appointed London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk] is responsible for implementing his ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ [http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Cycling%20Vision%20GLA%20template%20FINAL.pdf] which includes enforcing the law against pavement cycling [pages 23, 28 and 31]. Ealing and Hillingdon member of the London Assembly Dr Onkar Sahota [mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558] may be expected to pursue the issue in the London Assembly. Perhaps the best way to tackle the issue would be by clear signing and public pressure. It is only 6 years since the civil anti-smoking laws, enforced by Environmental Health Officers, came into force. No-smoking signs abound in public places and the law is generally observed because of public resistance to smoking. Simple self-explanatory signs against pavement cycling could have a similar effect in helping to enforce the 1835 Highways Act under which it is a criminal offence for anyone to ride (or even ‘scoot’) a bicycle on the public footpath. Public resistance to pavement cycling would do the rest.Perhaps significantly, there is no official ‘no-pavement-cycling’ sign in the Department of Transport’s library of road signs. However, a simple sign adapted from DfT’s Road Signs Manual Chapter 3 diagram 5.26 (page 37) would do the trick for Ealing:[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223943/traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03.pdf]This letter is copied to the Police Officers and Officials mentioned in the text plus local MPs Angie Bray and Steve Pound.Tony Purton Ealing W13 NOTE: In an e-mail exchange reacting to this letter, Ealing’s Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell made  the following statements:1. Ealing Council runs a nationally acclaimed cycle training course where lawful and proper cycling habits are taught 2. we work on a regular basis with our cycle trainers, the local cycling campaign and the local police to seek to discourage pavement cycling.3. We also work with the local police to try and pick up on known “hotspots” where this activity occurs 4. “we do not believe that the erection of what would have to be a mass of signs across the Borough on this matter is really (a) good spend of taxpayers money (b) in line with our policies on reducing street clutter and (c) likely to actively deter this activity to justify the spend.  5. “Our bikeability training was awarded a national award last year and is rated as one of the best in the country”6. “we are well aware of the issues of pavement cycling in the Pitshanger area”7. “I agree that adults cycling on pavements is not appropriate and illegal and as has been repeatedly explained to you something we are working on discouraging”. QUESTION: Have you seen any signs of Ealing Council or Ealing Police acting to ‘discourage’ pavement cycling?

Tony Purton ● 4550d37 Comments ● 4468d

The big Labour lie machine comes to Ealing

The Labour party paid for someone to push this through my door today whilst we were in the park, Walpole Park as it happens.  Let’s take apart Labour's spin and lies.  Let’s start with the “Investing” box.  The council spends almost nothing on cycling.  It merely rebrands the London Mayor’s spending on cycling as its own.  The cycle hub was paid for by Transport for London, not the council.  It would certainly have happened if the Tories were in power.  Not quite sure what they mean by “a new transport interchange at the station”.  There is a modernisation of the railway bit of the station going to happen with Crossrail and a new frontage.  Hardly a new transport interchange and all paid for out of the Crossrail project.  Nothing to do with the council.  The council might have insisted on escalators, an exit to the east of the station and a more sympathetic frontage but all three of these have slipped through it grasp.  When the Tories were in power we kept a close eye on Crossrail with a scrutiny panel.  I would hope we would have got a better deal for Ealing out of Crossrail than this council has.  The Walpole Park line particularly rankles with me as I kicked the project off in 2008.  The early stages of these things take a while.  It was a Conservative administration that allocated the council’s share of the money for this and I personally met the Heritage Lottery Fund to argue the case for this project, more here.  It is great that the Labour council has continued this project (it was so far advanced it would have been hard to stop frankly) but to try to claim it as a uniquely Labour achievement is simply unjust.  Much of what happens in local government is uncontroversial.  Good ideas prosper hopefully but take a while to work through the system.  More than 4 years often.  This kind of dividing lines nonsense is just another big Labour lie.  The current Labour administration has had little flexibility in capital spending, like ours before, due to the demands of school expansion.  Where it has had latitude it has spent £2.5 million on an empty car park in Southall and £10 million on new offices for council staff.  The car park really was their idea and one we consistently fought.  The officers tried to interest us in building them new offices, we said no.  Funny how these two don’t appear in the leaflets.  Looking at the right hand box, the local Tories also wholeheartedly approve of the Labour group freezing council tax for four years (like just about every other council in the country).  It might be nice if Labour acknowledged the £20 million of council tax freeze grant it has pocketed from the government to pay for it in large part (which is why most other councils also did the same thing).   We might have gone further but I am certain that we would not have put up the council tax at all at the very least.  The “Tories attack Ealing families” logo simply shows you just who is the nasty, name calling party in this borough at least.  No-one is “attacking Ealing families” unless you call leaving Ealing’s roads unmended and dirty an attack on families.  I wouldn’t use that language.  I would say that the Labour party is lying to “Ealing families” on a massive scale though.

Phil Taylor ● 4474d3 Comments ● 4474d

Cycling From Ealing

Can I ask whether anyone knows of any small cycling groups in the Ealing area? I took up recreational cycling about four years ago, it becoming quite a passion. My primary interest is mountain biking, although I’ve also done a reasonable amount of road cycling too, particularly in the winter (wet, muddy) months. From slow unfit beginnings I was very pleased indeed with my progression, cycling becoming more and more enjoyable the fitter I got, also resulting in people not having to wait for me so often – indeed there would be times I’d have to wait for others, which was quite a nice feeling!That was until a few medical issues in the second half of this year, resulting in me not cycling anywhere near as much and getting progressively less fit. It’s a bit of a vicious circle as being a lot slower I’m not enjoying it as much and so trend not to go out so much, exacerbating the problem. It would provide a lot more incentive if I could find a few other local riders of a similar level of fitness – i.e. brisk but not racers, whom I could perhaps tag on with regularly. I’m thinking of road riding but don’t currently have a road bike, using a mountain bike - but it’s a good, light one with dry off road tyres so isn’t bad on road. Prior to my medical and resultant fitness issues I could cruise at 17/18 mph on level road, hitting 20 at a push. However now I’m about 2 to 3 mph down on those values.Does anyone here do ‘training’ rides or know of anyone I might be able to approach?  

Chris Bennett ● 4479d4 Comments ● 4479d

Dr Onkar Sahota's application in Haven Green rejected

Neighbours are celebrating after a building application for a 128 year old house in Ealing's Haven Green Conservation area was thrown out at committee last night (Wednesday 13th March)The substantial property on Castlebar Road - bordering Longfield Walk was bought in 2011 for £1.4million by Ealing and Hillingdon GLA representative Dr Onkar Sahota.He wanted to add a basement, extend the house both sideways and to the rear and add a glass roof.Over a hundred people objected to the plans, claiming the proposals were highly detrimental to the area.Last night - despite the application being recommended for approval by Ealing Council planners - a committee of Councillors rejected it.10 voted against the proposed development, none for and there were three abstentions. Councillors were particularly unhappy with the glass roof extension which they described as looking like a glass 'roof box'.Liberal Democrat Councillor, Nigel Bakhai, voted against the application. He said: '' The plans were out of character with the Haven Green Conservation Area and I could not support officer's recommendation to approve.'' Victor Mishiku, who has been heading the local campaign says he used his 27 years' experience of planning issues to help local residents.He is appalled by the whole procedure, claiming planners 'ruthlessly' tried to push through this application and adds: '' Is Ealing Council Planning Department "fit for purpose"?  The 43 Castlebar Road case attracted comments from the Committee that the report was poorly written, absurd, in defiance of reality, insulting (to the intelligence) and part of the proposal was described as "disgraceful" and resulting in the glass box roof extension making the top roof part of the development being "lit up like a Xmas Tree''.Next door neighbour Judy Jaafar says: '' I and others will be writing formal letters of complaint to the LBE chief executive about how badly this whole application was handled by the Planning Department, about procedural irregularities and about how the planners were quite happy to break almost all their own planning guidelines in an effort to push this through. Fortunately the councillors saw through all the nonsense, "lies" in the words of one councillor, and we saw informed local democracy in action.'' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxI am sure you have all read this but what I find interesting is Doctor's sure do earn a lot of money maybe that's why the NHS is in crisis.Secondly, Isn't it strange that Planning control were happy with his plans. I hope it wasn't an inside job or that innapropriate payment was made to any officer. I hope they conduct a full investigation into this state of affairs because something smells fishy. Where there is money, there is corruption.

Anna Lang ● 4771d194 Comments ● 4490d

MAYOR MUST ACT TO PROTECT PEDESTRIANS

Published in 'Your Letters' Ealing Gazette Friday 13 December 2013For safety’s sake stay off pavementsIn response to London Assembly member Jenny Green’s call for Boris Johnson to act to protect cyclists on London’s roads [“Mayor must act to protect cyclists” letters Friday 6 December], will she also call on him to stop cyclists taking to the pedestrian pavements ‘for their own safety’. NO CYCLING signs on lamp posts would be a cheap and effective way to start (see below).However cyclists are viewed by other road users they are in law an anti-social and criminal menace when they ride on the pedestrian pavements. Under Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 pedal cycles are defined as carriages, to be ridden only on the carriageways. Rule 64 of the Highway Code defines pavement cycling as a NO-NO!Following the recent deaths of cyclists in London the Metropolitan Police appear to be monitoring more closely the behaviour of cyclists on the roads, and the behaviour of other road users towards cyclists. They should at the same time crack down on any cyclists riding on the pavement, which is a criminal offence in itself no matter how the rider behaves while doing so.Certainly a default 20mph speed limit on the capital’s streets would make a significant contribution to cycling safety by reducing the speed differential between cyclists and other road traffic.Tony Purton Ealing Copied to: 'James.Ayling@met.police.uk'; Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk'; ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk; bassam.mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk; 'andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk'; 'onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk'; 'steve.pound.mp@parliament.uk'; 'angie.bray.mp@parliament.uk'Personal reply from Jenny Bond: "In response to your comments about cycling on pavements, it makes me very angry when cyclists break the law because it is dangerous, disrespectful to pedestrians and gives a bad name to those cyclists who don’t break the rules." See also previous postings: Page 6: PAVEMENT CYCLING; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 2. Page 5: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 3THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES TO CONTACT ARE:Ealing’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293 London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk],  responsible for implementing London Mayor Boris Johnson’s ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Ward Councillors:Councillor Isobel Grant     Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk                              Councillor John Popham   John.popham@ealing.gov.uk                             Councillor Greg Stafford   Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukEaling Conservative Action TeamRosa Popham      rpopham@btinternet.com                              Ian Proud             ianproud@ip-associates.demon.co.uk

Tony Purton ● 4497d5 Comments ● 4491d

Widespread local opposition to the Lionel Road Scheme

Ealing residents may be aware that the London Borough of Hounslow last week approved a planning application by Lionel Road Developments Limited to build 910 high rise apartments, a 160 bedroom hotel and a 20,000 seat football stadium just over the South Ealing- Brentford border in a a triangular site bounded by Lionel Road, three railway lines and the West end of Chiswick High Road. This scheme is contrary to borough, GLA and national planning guidelines and policy, particularly as it contains no social or affordable housing and involves building tower blocks up to 17 storeys high within 5 metres of each other adjacent to the A4, the M4, Chiswick Road, the North Circular Road and Kew Bridge in an area where traffic congestion is already a major problem.The Council approved this aplication despite the serious objections made by over 1,000 residents of Chiswick W4, Brentford TW8, Richmond TW9 and others and despite the objections of local non-party political residents groups who represent many thousands of local people who live close to the proposed scheme. Members of these groups will have found it unnecessary to submit objections individually as they quite understandably felt they were represented by their local residents' group, society or association.The objectors included: 1. Brentford Community Council2. Chiswick High Road Action Group3. Strand on the Green Association4. Friends of Stile Hall Gardens5. The Kew Society6. The Kew Residents Association7. The Kew Bridge Owner's Association8. The Isleworth Society9. The West Chiswick and Gunnersbury Society10. The Thornton-Mayfield Residents Association11. The Temaire Place Residents Management Company 12. The Green Dragon Lane Housing Cooperative13. The Grove Park Group (whose objections were mysteriously omitted from the Officers' Report).14. The Isleworth SocietyImportant national and local organisations that objected included:15. The London Borough of Richmond on Thames16. English Heritage (whose objections will be a matter for consideration by the Secretary of State in accordance with Circular 02/09)17. The Georgian Group18. The Victorian Society19. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew20. Kew Bridge Engines Trust (The Steam Museum)21. The London Parks and Gardens TrustThe Greater London Authority commented critically on the Report but did not lodge an objection at this stage perhapsd because the planning application will now be referred to the Mayor in accordance with the Mayor of London Order 2008. The London Borough of Ealing made no objection even though Ealing residents nearby will be badly affected by the scheme - both during construction and afterwards.The application was supported by Stephen Pound, the MP for Ealing North (which is of course a safe distance away from Lionel Road,  Chiswick and Brentford).

David Giles ● 4499d13 Comments ● 4491d

CYLCING IN EALING'S PARKS - 2

CONFUSED OF EALINGHaving posted the original article on this topic I have become more conscious of the signing in Pitshanger Park. IT IS CONFUSING TO SAY THE LEAST!There is one solitary NO CYCLING sign in Pitshanger Park which stands between the bowling green and the tennis courts, facing towards the bowling green. This sign would imply that cycling is prohibited in the whole of the Eastern end of Pitshanger Park, which includes the children’s playground and the children’s play centre. HOWEVER, that area can be accessed by another path on the other side of the tennis courts, and from the park entrance opposite Barnfield Road where there aren’t any NO CYCLING signs. If Ealing Council rescinded its anti-cycling by-laws in 2006, as Anne Reddy suggested, perhaps this solitary sign is a forgotten relic of an earlier era. QUESTION: is cycling in this area allowed or not? ASK EALING COUNCIL!Then there is the footpath running from the bowling green to the Millet Arms past St Mary’s Church Perivale. At the entrance to the path there are overlapping anti-cycling barriers and a green finger sign (partly defaced) which reads “FOOTPATH LEADING TO PERIVALE” Underneath the green sign is blue finger sign pointing away from the footpath and past the bowling green towards Argyle Road which reads PERIVALE ½ followed by the image of a cycle which implies that cyclists should go that way. BUT a few metres down the footpath towards the Millet Arms there is a fairly new blue sign indicating a SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH. At the other end of the footpath there are similar anti-cycling barriers before the bridge over the Brent, and another blue SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH sign indicating it is OK to cycle from there to the Millet Arms exit. Entering path from the Millet Arms end there is a blue SHARED PEDESTRIAN/CYCLING PATH sign by the Lych Gate, and on the opposite side of the road is a blue finger sign with a cycle image on it indicating WEST EALING 1½. SO, on balance one might conclude that the footpath between the bowling green and the Millet Arms is a SHARED PATH. On other footpaths from the allotments area and from Argyle Road linking with the ‘SHARED’ footpath at the bridge over the Brent there are no shared pedestrian/cycling signs. QUESTION; Does the presence of the SHARED PATH signs on the ‘footpath’ between the bowling green and the Millet Arms and the absence of shared path signs elsewhere indicate that cycling on other footpaths in Pitshanger Park is NOT ALLOWED? ASK EALING COUNCIL!Looking at the other access points into Pitshanger Park from Argyle Road and Scotch Common there are no SHARED PATH signs anywhere. HOWEVER, at the entrance by the Argyle Road/Scotch Common roundabout there is a green finger sign pointing into the park saying PUBLIC FOOTPATH. On Scotch Common there are two signs – a green finger sign saying PUBLIC FOOTPATH pointing towards the park entrance opposite Kent Avenue, and where that footpath starts is a blue finger sign with a cycle image on it saying PERIVALE ¾. QUESTION: Is there one rule for cycling on the footpaths in Ealing’s open parks and another for cycling on enclosed footpaths like those in Pitshanger Park. ASK EALING COUNCIL!SO, whilst the law against pavement cycling alongside the highways is absolutely clear, but un-signposted, the local by-laws created and enforced by Ealing Council are totally unclear and the signposting is contradictory. CYCLISTS SHOULD ASK EALING COUNCIL TO EXPLAIN THE LOCAL BY-LAWS CLEARLY IN THEIR CYCLING PROMOTION LITERATURE, AND MAKE THEIR OFF-HIGHWAY SIGNAGE CONSISTENT WITH THOSE BY-LAWS!

Tony Purton ● 4525d1 Comments ● 4524d

CYCLING IN EALING'S PARKS

Re ‘Rude people towards cyclists in Lammas Park’ - posted 02/11/2013. CYCLISTS HAVE NO ‘RIGHT’ TO CYCLE ON FOOTPATHS AWAY FROM THE ROAD, but only commit an offence where local by-laws or traffic regulation orders create such an offence. It is the responsibility of every cyclist to ensure that he/she can ride legitimately and safely on any paths which are not part of the public carriageway. The ONLY place cyclists have an unassailable legal right to ride is ON THE PUBLIC HIGHWAY – NOT on the pavement (footpath), unless signposted for shared use, but ON THE ROADWAY (carriageway). REF: The Official Highway Code 2007 Edition ‘Rules for Cyclists’ pages 21-26.SEE EARLIER POSTS: PAVEMENT CYCLING/IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING  – 15/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 22/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS 2 – 26/10/2013; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS 3 – 26/10/2013While encouraging cycling, Ealing Council fail to include in their promotional material information on where cyclists can (and cannot) legally ride so that cyclists can be sure of their ‘rights’, and so that walkers can be aware that they are expected to share space with cyclists – while emphasising that cyclists must give priority to pedestrians. Why not ask for clarification. CONTACT EALING COUNCIL:- Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell - ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk; Cabinet Member for Transport and Environment Bassam Mahfouz - Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk    Cleveland Ward Councillors: Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk ; John.popham@ealing.gov.uk; Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukThe following extracts from the reference websites set out the issues.https://www.gov.uk/local-government-legislation-byelaws - Cycling in parks etc is subject to by-laws made by local councils …..  under an enabling power established by an Act of Parliament. Since by-laws create criminal offences, they cannot come into effect unless they have been confirmed by a Secretary of State http://www.theguardian.com/environment/bike-blog/2011/jul/28/cycling-pavement-offence  - The basic [1835 Highways Act] pavement cycling offence …..  does not apply on paths which are "away from the road" - for example in alleyways or in parks. Whether cycling is allowed is likely to depend on local considerations. In some cases there may be local by-laws prohibiting cycling - it's a good idea to watch out for these especially in parks and in pedestrianised areas.Local Government minister [Eric Pickles] announced [in July 2011] that councils no longer have to receive permission from Whitehall to remove restrictive by-laws. The initiative is part of a government effort to remove the red-tape facing many councils and to devolve decision-making to local communities. [Whether Ealing Council rescinded all its anti-cycling by-laws five years earlier in 2006, as suggested by Anne Reddy, is difficult to verify on Ealing Council’s website.]http://www.bikehub.co.uk/featured-articles/cycling-and-the-law/ - Cyclists have no right to cycle on footpaths “away from the road” but only commit an offence where local by-laws or traffic regulation orders create such an offence. If no local by-law signage is apparent, the local authority may (or may not) explicitly allow cycling in pedestrian zones. …. cyclists must give priority to pedestrians and must take the utmost care in areas where pedestrians hold sway. According to the Department for Transport’s Code of Conduct, cyclists need to weigh up whether there’s a critical mass of pedestrians: “In pedestrianised areas, only ride your cycle if there aren’t too many pedestrians about; otherwise dismount and push it.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Towpath - Not all towpaths are suitable for use by cyclists, but where they are, and the canal is owned by British Waterways, a permit is required. There is no charge for a permit, but it acts as an opportunity to inform cyclists about safe and unsafe areas to cycle. Some areas including London are exempt from this policy, but are covered instead by the London Towpath Code of Conduct. There is also a Two Tings policy in place, requiring bikes used on a towpath to be fitted with a bell, which should be rung twice when approaching pedestrians. Parts of some towpaths have been incorporated into the National Cycle Network, and in most cases this has resulted in the surface being improved.[11]http://www.nationaltrail.co.uk/thamespath/downloads.asp?PageId=106 - The Thames Path National Trail is not a long distance route for cyclists: Most of the Thames Path is a public footpath on which cyclists have no legal right to ride unless they have permission from the landowners - cycling without permission is a trespass offence against landowners.  http://www.royalparks.org.uk/about/cycling.cfm[Cycling in Royal Parks is now encouraged although in some places restricted.]

Tony Purton ● 4535d7 Comments ● 4525d

PAVEMENT CYCLING

IT GOES WITHOUT SAYINGPavement cycling is dangerous, anti-social, illegal, and a criminal act!Cycling is a road carriageway activity for a vehicle classed in law as a ‘carriage’ Highways Act 1835 Section 72 – Rule 64 of the Highway CodeThe government is actively promoting cycling as an alternative means of transport to reduce public dependence on private motor cars, improve personal fitness and reduce environmental pollution. The overall object is said to be to increase cycle use in the UK from 2% of journeys in 2011, to 10% of all journeys in 2025, and 25% by 2050In March 2013 London Mayor Boris Johnson published his ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ and appointed journalist Andrew Gilligan as his Cycling Commissioner. In April 2013 the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group published its ‘Get Britain Cycling’ report. Parliament debated the issue for four hours on Monday 2 September 2013. Some £100million is on offer from TfL to enable London Boroughs to improve road safety for cyclists..A national ‘Bikeability’ scheme is sponsored by the Department for Transport to teach safe cycling on the roads, administered through local authorities. Its training programme concentrates on youngsters of school age.Yet the danger to pedestrians of pavement cycling ‘goes without saying’. It is barely acknowledge in the above reports. It was mentioned only once in the Parliamentary debate. The issue is not addressed at all in any of the central or local government cycling publicity.Enforcing the law against pavement cycling is the responsibility of Britain’s police forces under the overall command of Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sir Bernard Hogan-Howe, since road laws are part of the criminal law. Yet it seems police policy to view pavement cycling as a ‘petty crime’, not worth bothering about, and certainly not worth any serious policing effort. As Parliament’s Public Accounts Committee commented in its October 2009 report on ‘Improving road safety for pedestrians and cyclists in Great Britain’ “Enforcing cycling offences was typically not high on the agenda of most police forces.”The legal sanctions against the crime of pavement cycling reflect this ‘petty crime’ attitude. Police officers can issue an on-the-spot £30 Penalty Notice to anyone over the age of 16 for cycling ‘irresponsibly’ on the pavement. Children under the age of criminal responsibility (10) cannot be prosecuted. The maximum penalty the courts can impose for causing death by dangerous cycling (on the pavements or on the road) is £2500. Pavement cycling occurs because a) many pavement cyclists believe (or claim) that cycling is a ‘pedestrian’ activity which is allowed on the pavements, b) most cyclists use the pavements because of the perceived danger of cycling on the roads, c) many pedestrians either believe the same thing or are pressured into ‘tolerating’ pavement cycling, d) there are no public notices declaring that pavement cycling is illegal.In 2007 a law was introduced banning smoking in public places. That law is widely respected, and many premises display a simple notice reinforcing the law. A similar simple sign widely displayed on our streets could have a similar effect to eliminate pavement cycling, if only police and local authorities would spend a fraction the money they have available for improving cycling safety on the roads - to keep cycling off the pavements. Transport for London is said to be developing a new ‘Pedestrian Safety Action Plan’ which should address the threat of pavement cycling to pedestrian safety.The message to cyclists must be: ‘’KEEP DEATH OFF THE ROADS – BUT DON’T BRING IT ONTO THE PAVEMENTS!”Tony Purton, Ealing W13

TONY PURTON ● 4556d23 Comments ● 4532d

Good News for Alcoholics and the Oil & Booze Industry

Yesterday the licensing committee for Hanwell granted a licence to the Shell garage in Church Road to sell alcohol. Only from 8am to 11pm though, mind you. There are some limits.This is good news for those characters in the local debating society who congregate on the bench in the garden of St Mellitus as they will have more choice of outlets from which to buy the substance that is destroying their lives.Some say it’s a good compromise as the initial request was for a 24 hour licence. I think that’s a defeatist view. I think it’s bad news for our area and we should have resisted it with all the means at our disposal. But maybe I’ve got too much faith in democracy.I would have hoped that local councillors would be the ones to defend our community from the malign avarice of big businesses pedalling alcohol to vulnerable addicts and petrol to the car dependent who are poisoning our atmosphere. But no! The licensee is a councillor himself, Shital Manro.Ok maybe that does fit the character of such a person if they are Conservative. But again, no! He is a Labour councillor. The Ealing Council website tells us that he holds a licence for six petrol stations in the borough. How is helping ordinary people? He’s just profiting from two of our century’s most abused substances.People of North Greenford, don’t vote for this man at the next election. He has made a mockery of our system.

Alan Anderson ● 4534d1 Comments ● 4534d

Greenford Redevelopment briefing, 21/11/2013

A briefing is being held regarding the redevelopment of the former GlaxoSmithKline site at the GSK site security office, Greenford Road (Thursday 21st November), ahead of the submission of the planning application in late November. I have serious concerns about what is being proposed and I feel that it will affect a great many more people than those who live in the immediate area. The cinema could be a good thing but does "a local food store" mean "supermarket"? Will it result in emissions from hundreds or thousands of extra cars in the area every day? How will it affect the shops that are already there? From what I've seen so far the development means even more "off the shelf" ugly architecture. How much more grey brick/weathered wooden panels/concrete can we take? They are a 21st century version of the red brick/white plastic stuff that was built in the 70s/80s. Will the tallest building be visible from the Horsenden Hill side? Will the development have a negative impact on the wildlife close to that section of the canal and change the nature of that place? Will the new development put off the many walkers who visit Greenford and spend money in the shops/pubs because the canal is a natural pleasant environment? It promises jobs but will they just be more part time minimum wage jobs? How many will the kind that pay a mortgage? Please look at the proposal and attend the briefing.  http://www.greenfordredevelopment.com/content/pdf/34_1383053613.pdf

Albertina McNeill ● 4536d1 Comments ● 4534d

5 Years Ago Today LBE Said YES  to Dickens Yard

Bonfire Night 2008 was the the fateful day that Councillor Potts' Planning Committee said YES to St George's Dickens Yard proposal to build 698 homes behind the Town Hall. How ironic it is that exactly five year later the current Planning Committee will decide tonight whether St George's 'inducement' of £3.65 million to LBE will persuade elected Members to remove the 2008 planning requirement for St George to build 59 Affordable Homes at Dickens Yard. After five years a quick assessment of where we are with Dickens Yard might be useful.+ 50% of flat sales have been to international buyers+ Still bargains to be had. 12, three bedded flats at £1.1+ million each are still on the market+ No retail occupation of the ground floors of the residential tower blocks already built. Retail experts predict these retail sites will never be occupied.+ The latest block under construction is huge. 13 storeys and still growing. You can now see it as you approach from Ealing Common around about Silom Village restaurant.+ The hole that is being dug now is vast. It looks like the result of an asteroid strike. Go and park in the never full Springbridge Road car park and marvel at the depth.The key questions asked in 2008 still remain. Exactly which local housing problem does Dickens Yard address? Why has a private company been given control of 4.4 acres of public land till then year 2258?Drag out the dynamite.....

Eric Alan Leach ● 4536d1 Comments ● 4536d

An appeal to our Council Leader

I’ve just finished reading this week’s Gazette and, having taken stock of the many awful events in store for Ealing, I find that I am furious with what this Labour council has allowed to take place. I can’t remember a time when so many bad things were on the cards.I’m going to list the issues here. Most of them have already been condemned on this forum but I want to show what cluster of rotten stuff is being allowed to happen. The A&E closure is out of the control of the council but the majority is directly approved by Ealing. So I ask how Julian Bell can justify these moves with his Labour supporting electors.The front page of the Gazette is dominated by some weird people supposedly typical of those protesting against the closure of Ealing Hospital A&E. I’m surprised that some on the forum support this on the basis that the existing service is unpopular. Surely this calls for improvements there rather than closure. Our prospect is for casualties being driven seven miles through traffic to Northwick Park or Hillingdon while maybe dying on the way. ‘Putting patients at the centre of the NHS’. Julian Bell has called these ‘weasel words’ and rightly so. The Conservative party didn’t achieve a majority in the general election but they are getting to put into action all their wicked policies. Will any of our institutions survive this coalition?The Oaks Development, Acton has been approved by this council. Come on, you’ve already vandalised the lovely Victorian swimming pool we had there. Is it your intention to kill Acton by leaving the legacy of this oversized monster in Acton High Street? Okay, some version of the inevitable flats/car park/supermarket that will mainly benefit rich investors you’d probably get away with, but this thing is an insult to us.Incinerator, North Acton. This one has yet to be approved. Let’s see who Julian puts first in this. I know we all throw stuff away but not enough is being done to make people reduce their black bag habit. Some families in our street must be buying, opening, chucking away consumables 24/7 because they leave up to four or five bags outside their house every week. Mass consumerism and the packaging that comes with it mainly benefits big businesses so they must be made to deal with rubbish in a way that doesn’t force harmful ‘nanoparticles, sulphur dioxide, benzene and noisy polluting lorries’ down the throats of those in a two mile radius.Arcadia Shopping Centre. A private equity real estate investor has got planning consent to plonk this cathedral to evil slap bang in the centre of our high street. In a more prominent position than Christ the Saviour on the opposite corner – a building dedicated to the unselfish, benevolent values we used to revere – a grossly branded monument to the destruction of nature and human health is to be erected. Instead of a McDonald’s we’d probably be better off with a diabetes drop in centre. Does Counsellor Julian Bell not worry about what people’s first impressions are when they arrive in Ealing? If you arrive by rail you’re greeted with a grotty terminal where the old and sick are forced to struggle up a mountain of stairs, above which is a hoarding for money lenders, and you are spewed out of the narrow doorway where lorries park on the small pavement and fly by night shysters wheel clamp the unwary. Nice.‘A new charity shop created by celebrity retail expert Mary Portas’ - a woman who has made herself famous by pointing rudely at all the things she doesn’t like - opened on The Green this weekend. The ‘business guru’ wants ‘local artists, crafts people, designers, cake bakers’ to come and give stuff to the shop. I’m sure she does. For her this is the perfect business model for self-promotion. It costs her nothing and makes her look like the saviour of its beneficiaries, Save the Children, and at the same time creating the impression that this self-styled ‘Queen of Shops’ has graced the people of Ealing with a little of her royal brilliance. Does she think we’re stupid? Her PR company is paid to promote and advise shopping mall giant Westfield, something you could argue has harmed Ealing directly. So come on Julian Bell. If you really are Labour don’t you think we should eject this phony woman from Ealing? Shouldn’t our tax money go to help poor children instead of bailing out the Post Office pension scheme to sweeten the gift of our Royal Mail to JP Morgan and other blood-sucking behemoths? How many more betting shops and fried chicken outlets are you going to dump on us?‘HS2 tunnel will cut disruption for neighbours.’ Not doing at all would be even better? A recent poll shows that 6 out of 10 would prefer rail management to be overhauled. We don’t trust any of the decisions being made in our name. Knock it on the head!No mention at all over the past two weeks about Warren Farm. Did you know if you take a short walk over the flight of locks near The Fox in Hanwell you arrive in a beautiful 61 acre meadow that used to be used by schools for galas and sport competitions? The organisers of the Mela wanted to hold their event there two years ago but were refused. I wonder why? Could it be that the council want us to forget about it so they can give it away? I wonder why 61 acres of the best drained playing fields in Ealing is being leased to QPR for a peppercorn rent for 200 years? We’ll never have the freedom to enjoy it the way we do now ever again. It doesn’t even make sense from an expedient business point of view. Does Hanwell really need drunk, chanting men traipsing through it every home game like there are now in Shepherd’s Bush?None of these events are in the spirit of what I understand to be Labour’s beliefs. There obviously were enough supporters to elect the Labour council in Ealing. Those within the party have just let everyone down. If this is the best they can manage then the party must need more active people with greater courage and conviction of the right kind. So come on the new blood, get in there! You can’t be any worse than what we’ve got. We must ensure that we see the appalling governance of this Bell end.

Alan Anderson ● 4536d0 Comments ● 4536d

An opportunity for a new A&E for Ealing?

Jeremy Hunt chose his words carefully saying that the Ealing Hosptial and the Charing Cross Hospital A&Es would remain open until alternatives were in place. We should start campaigning for a new purpose-built emergency centre in the W5 postcode that will be accessible to Ealing residents rather than waiting for whatever alternative arrangements central government might dump on us.Mr Maytree makes the same point on the getwestlondon.co.uk (Ealing Gazette) website -"Now that all the local luminaries, activists, and politicians have been photographed protesting at the proposed closure of bits of the sub-standard Ealing Hospital could we please get down to the business of what is really important and that is the provision of world-class emergency health care for Ealing itself."The wording of the announcements is interesting with the message that the facilities at Ealing and Charing Cross will continue to operate until alternative arrangements can be made. It strikes me that if the political ostriches could pull their heads out of the sand they would see an opportunity to influence these alternative arrangements. The closure of Ealing Hospital is not just to do with money, it is a dreadful place with an entrenched management and staff who are just not up to the job. The NHS wants to get rid of this problem and so what we should be doing is to start campaigning for a new accident and emergency unit for Ealing which is purpose-built to provide emergency medicine (trauma centre) rather than operating as a general hospital. I would prefer to see something close to a tube station and accessible to the residents of Ealing and Acton and not in the middle of nowhere like Ealing Southall hospital is."I could suggest the extremely poorly managed and semi-derelict Ascott Allotments site in South Ealing as a possibility for this. It is next door to South Ealing Tube station, two bus routes, and is close to the A4/M4 for emergency access, not to mention being accessible to people living in the W5, W3, W4, W13 post codes."

Anne Reddy ● 4539d5 Comments ● 4539d

JULIAN BELL AND EALING COUNCIL - Time to prove you have the interests of residents at heart

I am a resident of Acton - but wanted to post about something that is of importance to all residents in Ealing.On Wednesday (16th) the council is to vote about a controversial development to build a tower block in the heart of Acton on the site of the Oaks shopping centre. (See article in the Evening Standard below)http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/stars-and-locals-campaign-against-dogs-dinner-shopping-centre-plan-in-west-london-8873630.htmlThe block is STRONGLY opposed by local residents - hundreds of whom turned out to meet councillors at a site visit. The residents are not opposed to building housing on the site. However they are opposed to the building of a high-rise tower block in the middle of a low-rise Victorian town centre. They are opposed to the building of a gated-development in the middle of an area which is widely-known for being a tight-knit community. And they are concerned about the population density proposed for the site which is massively in breach of London planning guidance.So why should people living in Ealing care?Because this is an issue that affects every resident in Ealing. Across Ealing there have already been a number of developments which will only continue to grow in number with the huge pressure on land and space in London. But the  Ealing Labour council’s record has not always been good in dealing with new developments. Often they are voted through by councillors who do not live in the area - and therefore think they can avoid electoral damage while local councillors can protest innocence. (As is the case with this development)And often the council seem completely out-of-touch with the views of local residents. In our case senior Labour councillors have been tweeting about the arrival of a supermarket as part of the development - not realising that locally this is widely opposed if it comes at the cost of having an ugly barracks built in our community.So the vote on Wednesday 16th is a test.It is a test for Julian Bell and his Labour council.  The council needs to demonstrate whether they care about the residents they serve.  They need to show that they are on the side of voters when faced with developers that seem to neither know nor care about the communities that they are building in.Julian Bell and the Labour council need to show they are on the side of residents.

Richard Grange ● 4560d20 Comments ● 4543d

The hypocrisy of Councillor, Ray Wall

I am very upset by the article on Ealing Today about a Labour councillor raising money for the Ealing food bank. I can't believe that a councillor of any political party in Ealing would try and use a necessary and good cause as the Ealing food bank to get political publicity for their campaign. It is even worse that it is a Labour councillor who is part of the party that supposedly supports equality and inclusiveness in society but the Labour Party in Ealing has trodden on the least well off and most vulnerable without conscience during this term in power in Ealing. It has closed down several places providing day care for the ill and disabled and it has also introduced council tax charges for Ealing residents receiving disaibility allowances, income support, and sickness benefit which other councils have not and which even Ealing's conservatives would not do. What use is £20 or £30 of free food when you are having to pay £300 of extra council tax out of your unemployment or disability?I have to ask where was Councillor Ray Wall when the Ealing Labour Party was using its block vote to close down Ealing's day care facilities for the ill and disabled? Where is he seen speaking out against the extra council tax from people's meagre benefits? Where was he? The word that comes to mind is "hypocrisy".I am a Christian I am also surprised that there is no mention of the fifty mainly Christian churches that made this project happen. To me the article reads as though the food bank is some kind of worthy cause set up in some way by Councillor Wall himself.I shall pray for you Councillor Wall in the hope that you may do something to relieve needy people in Ealing of your extra taxes.

Paula James ● 4574d1 Comments ● 4574d

Gunnersbury park for exclusive private school?

Cut and Pasted from the Brentford TW8 forum. Cannot see it on the Ealing version but it is an Ealing issue, especially as the area in question will affect teh Ealing /Acton part of the park first.It's possible that this could be the beginning of the end of the park as a public park. Developers are salivating over the potential of grabbing slices of the place and it could become an exclusive facility for the wealthy.Topic: Gunnersbury Park in danger again. Forum HomePosted by: K DanielsDate/Time: 05/04/13 10:11:00Hello All,You may already have heard that the Councils have appointed a firm of developers to turn the Small Mansion into an extension of an Ealing private girls' school. If this goes ahead, the public will be barred access to a large chunk of the Park (in contravention of the legal covenant) as well as suffer increased traffic, noise, pollution, etc.There is a meeting of the Gunnersbury Park Joint Advisory Board on Friday 19 April at 6.30 in the Small Mansion. I don't know what's on the agenda, but do try to come along to find out more and express your views. Let's have a good turnout and try to nip this in the bud, or, once a precedent is established,  the rest of the Park will follow suit. every blade of grass belongs to the public. Gunnersbury is an amazing park, lets try & keep it that way. Gunnersbury is being regenerated, take a keep @ the official you-tube channel.http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_iLFCh1HAfQBest wishes.PLEASE ATTEND THIS MEETING & SHOW YOUR SUPPORT TO KEEP THIS PARK IN THE PUBLIC DOMAIN ! APRIL 19TH @ 6.30PM AS ABOVE.

Michael Brandt ● 4741d55 Comments ● 4587d

Man had sex with a goat.

I read this today in this evening's standard. What on earth is happening to society. I know some of you on this forum will not find this shocking and will start screaming the political correction debate. But come on guys, is this normal. Even some of you will start saying it is a free society. Every man to his own. A man has been banned from visiting every single farm in the country after he had sex with a goat.Robert Newman, 23, admitted the offence at a farm in Wiltshire in April.He pleaded guilty at North West Wiltshire Magistrates Court in Chippenham and was released on bail.Newman, of Devizes, Wilts, was ordered to keep away from farm animals and stay indoors after 7pm.He had been due to stand trial but changed his plea to guilty and will be sentenced on September 12, after a pre-sentence report has been prepared.Newman must obey a curfew between 7pm and 7am and is not allowed to enter any land where farm animals are kept.In a similar unrelated case, last year father of three Nicholas Saunders was convicted of having sex with his ex-wife's dog.He was caught having intercourse with the four-year-old bull mastiff called Sasha in former wife Kelly Thacker’s bed.Saunders, of Lechlade, Glos, was placed under supervision and ordered to attend a sex offenders course.He was placed on the sex offenders register for the next five years.He was also given a four-year restraining order preventing him from entering his ex-wife’s home without her written permission or by court order.Passing sentence, recorder Stewart Patterson told him: “It is quite clear from your behaviour that night that you demonstrated distorted sexual thinking which needs to be addressed."

Asha Smith ● 4612d35 Comments ● 4587d

Deadline tonight 10pm - Oppose Appeal on Victorian Villa Peacehaven 3 Creswick Road

Please e-mail before 10pm tonight and ask for safe receipt of your letter/e-mailEmail address is teamp13@pins.gsi.gov.ukThe Planning Inspectorate – Case Officer (Mr Paul Puddy)3/05 WingTemple Quay House2 The SquareBristolBS1 6PNReference to quote on all documentation is APP/A5270/A/13/2202542 Appeal made by Mr S. Ben Shooshan : Peacehaven 3 Creswick Road, W3 9HEThe above mentioned was refused planning permission by the Councils Planning Committee for the following reasons set out below and the owners Mr S B Shooshan have now issued an appeal to the Planning Inspectorate.If you would like to comment or oppose this appeal please note that you will need to write to the Planning Inspectorate tonight before 10pm as this is the deadline.Below are the reasons why this application was refused by the Planning Committee1. The proposed development would entirely screen existing protected trees at the rear of the development site which have a high amenity value and provide a valuable contribution to the area. The development would, therefore, be contrary to policies 5.5 of the adopted Ealing Unitary Development Plan 'Plan for the Environment' 2004, policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Adopted Development (Core) Strategy and policies 7.21 of the London Plan 2011. 2. The design of the proposed development fails to reflect the character of the area and would be of an inappropriate scale to the size of the site and would for these reasons be contrary to policy 5.5 of the adopted Ealing Unitary Development Plan 'Plan for the Environment' 2004, emerging policies 7.4 and 7C of the Draft Ealing Development Management Development Plan, policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Adopted Development (Core) Strategy and policy 3.5 of the London Plan 2011. 3. The proposal would fail to protect and enhance the character of the existing locally listed building on site and would therefore be contrary to policy 4.7 of the adopted Ealing Unitary Development Plan 'Plan for the Environment' 2004, emerging policy 7C of the Draft Ealing Development Management Development Plan, policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Adopted Development (Core) Strategy and policies and policy 7.8 of the London Plan 2011. 4. The development proposal provides insufficient information with respect to the current use of the existing Peacehaven building on site and for this reason the development has the potential to give rise to car parking and other planning related issues. Therefore, the development would be contrary to policies 9.1 of the adopted Ealing Unitary Development Plan 'Plan for the Environment' 2004, emerging policy 6.13 of the Draft Ealing Development Management Development Plan, policies 1.1 and 1.2 of the Adopted Development (Core) Strategy and policy 6.13 of the London Plan 2011.NB. Original planning application number for this application is PP/2013/0111 Case Offficer for LBE Planning Dept was Emma Lewis FYI.

Maria Fitzsimmons ● 4591d2 Comments ● 4591d

17 Questions Cllr Bell needs to provide answers too.

1.             Why did the Leader feel the need to attend personally this initial pre-application and not any others? What was so special about this application?2.             Will the Leader outline fully the “correct procedure” that he described at Full Council on the 16th July which he was following?3.             Did the Leaders office in fact handle the initial enquiry from Dr Sahota? Or was it The Leader himself?4.             Who at the Council side set up the appointment? Was it with Dr Sahota personally or his office?5.             If the request for a pre-application meeting was made verbally, when and where was it made?6.             If the request was made in writing, was it by letter or email?  If the request was by email, was it sent from Dr Sahota’s personal or private email address?7.             Who decided which Officers should attend? Were the Officers under instructions to attend?8.             How long did the meeting last?9.             Why were no notes of the meeting taken? Who decided on that course of action?10.    What “advice” did Dr Sahota actually receive about his application?11.    Did the Leader involve himself in any way with any planning officer before the report into the application was compiled and released?12.       Why did the planning officer who wrote the report suddenly resign from the department just before the report was presented to planning committee?13.       Will this planning officer be interviewed as part of the investigation and if not why not?14.       Did the Leader personally support the candidacy of Dr Sahota for GLA membership in 2012?15.             Did the Leader personally campaign for Dr Sahota at the GLA elections in 2012?16.       Has the Leader of the Council ever enjoyed any hospitality at Dr Sahota’s expense at any time?17.       Did the Leader discuss this application at any stage in any form with the Chair of the Planning Committee?

Benjamin Dennehy ● 4633d9 Comments ● 4620d

Fraudulent Council heating contractor, who do you complain too?

We had the usual annual gas safety check letter from Ealing council, showing us what safety checks will be carried out and when. T. Brown the contractor turns up on said day, "we've come to replace the flue on your boiler" (they've not even looked at said boiler yet). And they spoke of needing a builder to knock out a fair amount of brickwork in order to do so. They also refused to carry out the safety check, saying it was not that sort of appointment. Percival House would not deal with the matter or take a complaint from us.When the contractor turns up again, it was "because of the fault we found with the flue when we carried out the safety check we need to fit this flue" No safety checks were carried out, no-one has looked for a fault with the boiler, gas stove or any other gas related fittings to the house. They then insisted on fitting the said flue, making the comment that the boiler was old and may need replacing soon. And what do you know, it has not worked since they touched it. It worked perfectly before they got their hands on it, now it does not. We still have had no gas safety checks, T. Brown still replaced the flue to the boiler that had no reported faults to it, and had no contractor even look for a fault on it.We know what the next step will be, they will make more work for themselves by claiming the boiler will need replacing as hinted at.Why does Ealing Council have no way of reporting those sort of contractors? This is a major safety issue, no gas safety checks have been carried out yet T. Brown know of (unreported) fault to a boiler they or anyone else have never even looked at since it's last annual check.

Leslie Bailey ● 4628d7 Comments ● 4626d

me and mobile phones do not get on!

I have a basic mobile phone. It has no internet, no email, can do nothing except make calls and send and receive texts. Yet still I can make mistatkes by sending texts to the wrong people. It is so easily done and can be very embarrassing.I'll share with you something that happened to me a few months ago.  I had enrolled on a gym personal training course which was for a week. I decided i would train as a personal trainer because I hate going to gyms and being pestered so if i had the knowledge and qualification, I could train myself.On the first day, mid morning at break, a guy who i had not noticed before came over and introduced himself and shook my hand. I thought what a nice gentleman. I was very impressed.From then, we would chat and sit next to each other at clas and i would help him in his theory work. He was also attractive, over 6ft tall and covered in tatoos. I would wonder whether he was married or was gay because he never spoke about his life.Then on the last day of the course, we were studying nutrition and how junk food is bad for children. He suddenly said in the clas 'I take my kids to macdonalds'. He then told me that he had seperated form his first wife and was now dating an asian girl but she lived about 200 miles away and they would meet up at weekends.We left on friday. we didn't exchange numbers and that was it. Then on Saturday afternoon, i received a text. I then realised it was from him. I was very shocked as i had not given him my number.It said 'Hi Ash, how are you. Would you ike to meet up for a coffee to go through the books!!!!.Now, in my head all thoughts were going through. What does he mean. What are all the exclamation marks. Does he fancy me. Does he really want to study. How did he get my number?Now I just had to tell a friend of mine and in my message to my friend i wrote - ' I am not the type of girl to have an affair, i hope he has not got the wrong idea.and can you believe it, by mistake, i had clicked on the send button and sent it to that guy by mistake.I was horrified, mortified. Words cannot describe how I felt. I wanted to die.After half an hour, i received a reply from the guy. he wrote!!!!all i wanted was some help with my course work. I have a partner and i love her with all my heart.Now there are two ways of looking at this message.But ever since, i am so so careful with text messages. I hate mobile phones.

Asha Smith ● 4632d4 Comments ● 4630d

Dr Sahota planning application and Cllr Bell intervention

I sent this email yesterday having found out information that concerns me. Why did Cllr Bell organise a meeting prior to application being heard with Dr Sahota, planners and his architects on site? This is not usual practice for the Leader!I believe Cllr Bell has behaved with poor judgment at best and something far more serious at worst. I ask you to write to Cllr Bell seeking clarification. He refuses t answer me.Dear Dr Sahota,I made a FOI request regarding a meeting you had with the Leader of the Council and planners prior to your planning application being heard. I understand you made a request for this meeting through Cllr Bell's office and that he acted as an introducer.The FOI answer said:"Cllr Bell was also present to facilitate introductions as the request for advice had come from Dr Sahota through Cllr Bell’s office."May I ask why you did this? Cllr Bell does not represent the ward of the development. Why did you not make this request through your local councillors or the normal planning channels that other applicants do?What were you hoping to achieve by invoking the Leader's office?Do you think it fair that you get an audience and are introduced to planners by the Leader yet other planning applicants are rarely, if ever, afforded such treatment with the Council Leader?Do you think it looks appropriate for a London GLA member to have requested this meeting? In the interest of transparency were minutes of the meeting taken and if not, why not?My residents are rightly interested to know why a wealthy and powerful Labour politician used the Leaders office to get a meeting with planners to discuss his application that was subsequently supported by officers against an outcry from residents.Cllr Bell has refused to respond to my correspondence asking him about this meeting.I am making no inferences. I have no idea what was said at that meeting. I am just interested to know your thoughts on the matter, as are my residents. After all we have an open democracy and  this is now a matter of pubic record.You do not have to respond but I feel it would be appropriate to do so as inferences, rightly or wrongly, could be drawn. Your explanation would be most welcome.Kind regards,Benjamin

Benjamin Dennehy ● 4652d0 Comments ● 4652d

Volunteer Photographer Opportunity - Ealing Heritage Lottery Fund Projects

Time Lapse Photography VolunteerEaling Council is managing programmes of redevelopment and restoration in Walpole Park, PM Gallery & House, Gunnersbury Park and Gunnersbury Park Museum aided by Heritage Lottery Fund grants.We want to document the changes to the four sites throughout the projects by taking regular, seasonal photographs of key areas.The first site to undergo capital works will be Walpole Park. Close to the centre of the borough in Ealing itself, this park was formerly the historic garden of Pitzhanger Manor, the country home of John Soane, the late 18th century architect who designed the Bank of England and other famous London landmarks. Soane’s townhouse in Lincoln’s Inn Fields is now an important London museum and houses his eclectic and influential collection of artwork and other cultural artefacts, including paintings by Hogarth.Role DescriptionPurpose of RoleVolunteers will take photographs of key areas of the four Heritage Lottery Funded sites as works progress.Range of key tasks and opportunities1. Take high quality photographs according to exact specifications2. Document changes to sites as seasons change and capital works progress3. Link photographs to historic views of the sites, contributing to the legacy of the projects and heritage of the sitesRequirementsVolunteers should have good interpersonal skills and be confident to talk informally to members of the public about the activities they are involved in and how they contribute to the developments of the sites.The ability to take clear, high quality photographs is necessary and photographic training is preferred.Camera can be provided but volunteers with their own equipment would be welcome!CommitmentWe would be aiming to photograph the sites on a monthly basis, therefore volunteers would need to be available once a month for half a day in the first instance. More time may be required as the projects develop.For more information or to apply please contact Ellie Lewis-Nunes, Outreach Officer on:LewisNunesE@ealing.gov.uk or 020 8825 6787

Ellie Lewis-Nunes ● 4661d7 Comments ● 4659d

Hanwell Community Forum v Ealing Council

Reading that Hanwell Community Forum (HCF)HCF is threatening to take the council to court because they want to give QPR the go ahead for the redevelopment of Warren Farm is appalling. HCF only has a core group of a dozen or so people and the three meetings that I have attended over the last four years has never seen more than fifteen people present. The last meeting I went to had eight people, so for HCF to claim that she is representing the interests of ALL Hanwellians is simply not correct.Warren Farm will be open to everybody. The facilities will be massively improved from pitches to showers. I would suspect that QPR are likely to put on training sessions for the local community. I also noticed in yesterday's Evening Standard that Notting Hill Home Ownership describes one of the attractions for the new development "The Boatyard" as "Warren Farm which has a very large sports ground with football and cricket pitches". It would be a fantasy to claim that I am a QPR fan. Many more people would use Warren Farm if it was properly maintained. HCF has not done any consultation with local residents so to claim that the council is relegating residents green spaces is sheer utter tosh.Questions I would like answered are:If HCF proceeds with legal action who is going to foot the bill for HCF to take the council to court? How many people agree with HCF for them to proceed with legal action?Are those signatories freely available? Can those signatures be audited? Have they consulted all local residents to claim representation before taking the case to court? If not, why not?How many Hanwell residents are needed for HCF to claim that they are representing the interests of the majority of residents?How long will the plans be suspended if HCF takes the council to court?One example of the dicatorship of HCF is the redevelopment of the Uxbridge Road through Hanwell. I discovered that HCF wanted the improvements to match their own self interest and not those who also live in Hanwell. I spoke to the Chair, Carolyn Brown, at one of the consultations, who disagreed with the plans despite having significant benefits for cyclists.  Carolyn and HCF has done a huge amount of good for Hanwell, but that does not give her (or them) the power take the council to court on under the guise of representating Hanwell residents.

Ben Owen ● 4680d23 Comments ● 4670d

Sunflower Summer Fete this Saturday 22nd June

For a fun day out for all the family, visit Southfield Primary's Sunflower Fete on Turnham Green, Chiswick(by Turnham Green Church) this Saturday 22nd June from 11am to 4pm.This year the theme for the children’s fancy dress parade which is always a highlight of the fete is ‘The Mad Hatter’s Tea Party’ and there will be a prize for the best hat and outfit.Fete Attractions will include: a bungee trampoline and bouncy castle. Little ones will enjoy the face painting and other activities in the Children’s Craft Corner or try their hand at traditional games such as hook-a-duck while older children will love the football tournament, beat the goalie and old favourites such as the coconut shy – there’s something to amuse all ages.To bag a bargain, pay a visit to a variety of stalls selling everything from second hand books to plants, flowers, toys and bric-a-brac and do not miss out on the opportunity to participate in the Tombola to win some fantastic prizes. With a great selection of food and snacks on offer with tea and light refreshments, you can indulge your taste buds at the Sunflower Cafe, the Wyndham House barbeque, the Pimms Tent or try a selection of an eclectic mix of food from around the world from the International Food Stall - courtesy of the culinary skills of the school’s parents, while you enjoy the music from the jazz quartet. The Sunflower fete is supported by local businesses and organised by The SPSA (Southfield Parent Staff Association - registered charity 1015206) which works hard to raise funds for projects and much needed resources that enhance the children’s experience at school.

Marina Judith ● 4674d0 Comments ● 4674d

Council Tax Demands Unlawful?

In two roads in the Borough, out of the blue, about 20 Council Tax Demands have been sent to persons living under Licences to occupy a room in a larger building used as an HMO. Some going back into 3 financial years!To date, the freehold owner (Licensor) has paid all taxes and heating/lighting, etc with the Licence fee being inclusive.Most of the rooms are bare rooms with licencees having to share cooking facilities in a Kitchen in the basement of the 4-storey house. Rooms have shared bathrooms outside their room or some have a shower/WC inside the room but no Kitchen. The Licence states that a room may have to changed for another room on 24 hours notice. Access with a key for the owner (and his cleaner) is reserved. No food preparation or cooking is allowed in the room. The licencee must quit the building on 7 days notice. The house is registered with the Council as a Licensed HMO.The payment of Council Tax legislation (under Section 8 and Class C) displaces the normal liability of occupiers to pay Council Tax and the liability falls solely on the owner in premises such as this.This is very worrying as people would not have taken rooms if they had known that this would arise (wrongly!).It is believed that the Council Tax Demands are all unlawful.The Council staff claim that it is "nothing to do with the Council" at all and has arisen because of re-banding assessments carried out by the VOA earlier this year and advises that everyone must pay the (unlawful) Demands in full and then try to claim the money back by appealing to a Valauation Tribunal (which normally deals with mere Valuation comparables).However, it is the Council that is demanding these monies from persons who are by law not liable for them!This is a serious matter and Cllr. Yvonne Johnson, the Finance Portfolio Holder, has kindly agreed to investigate this and the legal issues that have been drawn to the Council's attention of which their staff seem oblivious.

Victor Mishiku ● 4714d46 Comments ● 4680d

Fight the privatisation of the NHS sign the petition

You cannot trust this Government on anything! This email has just been circulated:A new fight over NHS privatisation has just begun. Jeremy Hunt is trying to use new powers, hidden within last year's controversial NHS laws, to force local GPs to privatise more health services. [1] This is one of the things we were afraid might happen - and now our worst fears are being confirmed. We need to do all we can to stop it.Jeremy Hunt's new privatisation plot is contained within "NHS competition regulations". [2] Usually these kinds of rules get quickly rubber-stamped by Parliament. This time, we need to get MPs and Lords to stand up to Hunt and block his plans. [3]It’s a long shot, but we have a chance of stopping these changes because Hunt is breaking promises made to MPs when NHS laws were voted through last year. [4] If we generate a huge, public outcry to put pressure on the politicians who clung on to those promises last time the government attacked our NHS, we can convince them to stop these new laws.Sign the petition against Jeremy Hunt's new NHS privatisation plan here – we’ve got just a couple of days before we’ll need to deliver it:https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-section75Hunt's new regulations (Statutory Instrument 257 under Section 75 of the Health & Social Care Act 2012) are like a catalogue of our worst fears. [5] GPs would have to open up every part of local health services to private companies, whether or not it’s what they or local people want. It would speed up the break up of the NHS, giving profit-hungry companies new rights to muscle in.Last year, the government promised it wouldn’t go as far as forcing privatisation on local health services. Lots of MPs and Lords said these promises convinced them to vote for the NHS law. Now, we need to go back to these same MPs and Lords, and tell them to find some backbone. If they really voted for the law because of those promises, now they’ve got no excuse not to put a stop to Hunt’s latest privatising move.Let’s build a petition to hand in to each of the MPs and Lords who believed the government’s promises on privatisation:https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-section75All over the country, 38 Degrees members have been working together to convince their local NHS decision makers to do the right thing and limit privatisation in their area. Now, government is trying to take that power away from local doctors and the patients they serve.This is going to be tough. It could be the start of the second round of the fight to protect everything that’s precious about the NHS. But it’s the right thing to do, because we know that when private companies move in, all too often it doesn’t end well for patients.Sign the petition now:https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/nhs-section75Thanks for being involved,Ian, Becky, Alex and the rest of the 38 Degrees teamNOTES[1] The National Health Service (Procurement, Patient Choice & Competition) Regulations 2013 http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2013/257/contents/made[2] Under Section 75 of the Health and Social Care Act 2012[3] Although rare, there have been a few examples of Parliament blocking regulations contained in secondary legislation: http://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-information-office/l07.pdf[4] For example, Simon Burns MP, then a health minister, told parliament: “...it will be for commissioners to decide which services to tender…to avoid any doubt—it is not the Government’s intention that under clause 67 [now 75] that regulations would impose compulsory competitive tendering requirements on commissioners, or for Monitor to have powers to impose such requirements.” (12/7/11, Hansard, c4423)[5] See for example this briefing by Keep Our NHS Public: http://www.keepournhspublic.com/pdf/Section75parliamentarybriefingFeb%202013.pdf

Jaz Brown ● 4788d8 Comments ● 4744d

Maximum of 4 dogs allowed to be walked.

Commercial dog walkers in the Royal Parks are being made to pay £300 for a licence and are limited to walking four animals at a time.The licence system was introduced on April 2 and requires dog walkers to pay the £300 annually for a permit and agree to the code of conduct, limiting the number of dogs they can walk.The new system will cover all the Royal Parks, including Hyde Park, Richmond Park, Green Park, Bushy Park and Kensington Gardens. Professional dog walkers who are caught without a licence could be fined and banned.Park managers said they had taken action after complaints about some people walking large numbers of dogs at the same time, but opponents said the reforms had been sneaked in and effectively stopped them from using some of London’s most beautiful green spaces. Sophie Langella, a professional dog walker for 13 years who regularly uses the Royal Parks for her Dog Aerobics business, is among those leading a campaign against the new licences.She said: “They sneaked them in and we weren’t given any notice at all about them.“It’s very disappointing. When other parks have introduced licences or dog control orders we have worked with them and explained what we do, and in general the limit has been set at six dogs.“Six is what the insurance companies allow. There is no way I can afford to pay for the licence and only walk four dogs without putting my prices up.“Already I can see that the other parks are becoming much busier because dog walkers aren’t using the Royal Parks, so there is a knock-on effect.” More than 600 people have signed a petition against the licence system. Sera Mendelson, from Willesden, has called for tougher restrictions after her dog, a Pomeranian called Bella, died on her first trip out with a dog walker.Bella had been taken out by a commercial walker with “several” other dogs in September 2011 and ran off after being taken off the lead. She was found injured in Kenwood car park the next day after being run over. Mrs Mendelson said: “These people are businesses and if they are having to pay that much money, and then only walk four dogs, they simply won’t go to those parks, which means there will be more people in other parks and on the streets.”In a statement, parks management said: “The introduction brings commercial dog walking in line with the way we manage other commercial activities. We have observed an increase in the number of commercial dog walkers, including those who exercise large numbers of dogs at the same time.”I think they should introduce this scheme to Ealing Parks. I often see dog walkers with 6 or 7 dogs and just this morning, one of the dogs ran off and the owner was calling him but he wouldn't come back so she had to run off to get him and all the other 6 were left on their own.

Asha Smith ● 4746d0 Comments ● 4746d

Bogus wedding In West London

Immigration inspectors had been tipped off by staff at Hillingdon register office that the “happy couple” did not seem to be in a legitimate relationship. They went to Monday’s ceremony at the civic centre in Uxbridge and swooped on the man shortly before the wedding started.The 22-year-old Indian groom, who had been living in Harlington, was found to have over-stayed his visa and was arrested and detained for being in the country illegally. He is expected to be deported.His intended bride, a 23-year-old Hungarian woman who is here legally under EU law, was questioned and later released by officers. The pair did not share a common language.Sarah Burton, from the UK Border Agency, said: “We are working closely with registrars across the London to clamp down on sham weddings and civil partnerships. This operation is another example of the success that we are having.“Where there are suspicions that a relationship may not be genuine we will investigate and, if necessary, intervene to stop it happening.”Councillor Jonathan Bianco said: “The London borough of Hillingdon takes its duty in regards to the institution of marriage seriously and is proud that our staff helped the UK Border Agency expose this sham marriage. Our staff are trained to look out for suspicious activity and helped raise the alarm in this case.“We hope that it will act as a deterrent to others who may be considering a sham marriage and sends out a clear message that criminal activity won’t be tolerated.” Last week a solicitor from Hatfield was jailed for 10 years for organising sham marriages on what was called “an industrial scale”, involving more than 1,000 couples and netting him and his accomplices an estimated £20 million.Judge John Bevan said members of Souleiman GA solicitors had run a “conveyor belt” of brides being flown in from eastern European countries. They would marry men they had never met from non-EU countries.The UK Border Agency received more than 1,700 calls from registrars worried about sham marriages in 2011, double the number of the previous year

Asha Smith ● 4786d79 Comments ● 4774d

True or Scare -Mongering?

Duchess devastated by hospital tragedy: Little boy, 4, who stole Kate's heart at hospice died after blunders by clinic at centre of NHS scandal'Honour': Mackenzie Cackett's tragic plight won the heart of the Duchess of Cambridge when she met him at the Treehouse Hospice, of which she is a patronThe Duchess of Cambridge met Mackenzie Cackett while he was receiving end of life care at The Treehouse Hospice, Ipswich, of which she is a patron.    Comments (32)    ShareBritain's oldest mod refuses to give up her scooter and still wears Doc-Martin boots and khaki jacketsMaureen with the scooter she drives now, her new Olympics special edition Vespa PX 125xxSeptuagenarian Maureen Leer from Colchester in Essex, refuses to stop riding her scooters despite her children's desperate attempts to make her stop and settle down.    Comments (133)    ShareNeigh thanks! Food minister turns down Findus bolognese lunch because it would be 'bad politics' to eat itFood Minister David Heath turns down a Findus spaghetti bolognese lunch from MoS man Nick Constable saying it would be 'bad politics'David Heath (left) insisted ready meals were safe following the withdrawal of Findus beef lasagne meals despite refusing a meal from MoS man Nick Constable (right).    Comments (109)    Videos    ShareEU super spies to get right to snoop on your emails, website visits, medical data and police recordsFormer Shadow Home Secretary David Davis has warned about plans European super-spying agencyThe controversial move, demanded by Brussels in an EU directive, will sweep aside British privacy laws that protect UK citizens from intrusion into their personal lives.

Os A Whittle ● 4803d0 Comments ● 4803d

Underground Orchestra - Shepherds Bush Empire - Sat 26 Jan - In aid of charity Day Trippers

Hello all,Apologies for putting out a plug as a first post, i am normally found on the Chiswick version of the site! I am taking part in a very special concert at the Shepherds Bush Empire this Saturday. It is in aid of the local childrens charity Day Trippers www.daytrippers.org.uk.In a nutshell, Shaun Buswell, a friend of mine, set out to put together an orchestra of people he met on the tube for the first time, while carrying their instruments. After one year of toil, he pulled together the musicians on the 12 December last year and there is a one time only concert taking place at Shepherds Bush Empire on Saturday 26th January mixing some classical numbers, a medley of music from films set in London and songs from Shaun's band. A few of Shaun's band are also taking part (i count as one of them).In addition, we are also looking for musicians to take part in a "flash mob" song, which is part of the show. Anyone taking part in this will get a free ticket and sit together in the gallery at the Empire to watch the show and play their instrument during the song. We will just need names and instruments in advance and people can PM through here if they would like to take part.Details of the challenge here:http://www.121212.org.uk/Tickets here:http://www.o2shepherdsbushempire.co.uk/event/47909/the-12-12-12-underground-orchestra-challenge-ticketsFacebook:https://www.facebook.com/events/436586566408386/I look forward to hearing from anyone who would like to take part in the flash mob and of course anyone non-musicians who would like to come and watch a very special, unique event (and the largest group of musicians to ever play the SB Empire)Many thanks in advanceMartin

Martin Whaley ● 4820d0 Comments ● 4820d

On a lighter note, The Curry Contest

CURRY CONTESTIf you can read this whole story without laughing then there's absolutely no hope for you. Note: Please take time to read this slowly.For those of you who have lived in Natal , you know how typical this is. They actually have a Curry cook-off about June/July. It takes up a major portion of a car park at the Royal Show in Kathmandu.Judges # 1 & 2 were two food critics from EnglandJudge #3 was an inexperienced food critic named Frank, who was visiting from America .Frank: "Recently, I was honoured to be selected as a judge at a Curry Cook-off. The original person called in sick at the last moment and I happened to be standing there at the judge's table asking for directions to the beer garden when the call came in. I was assured by the other two judges ( Natal Indians) that the curry wouldn't be all that spicy and, besides, they told me I could have free beer during the tasting, so I accepted".Here are the scorecard notes from the event:CURRY # 1 - SEELAN'S MANIAC MONSTER TOMATO CURRY....Judge # 1 -- A little too heavy on the tomato. Amusing kick.Judge # 2 -- Nice smooth tomato flavour. Very mild.Judge # 3 (Frank) -- Holy XXXXXX, what the hell is this stuff? You could remove dried paint from your driveway with it. Took me two beers to put the flames out. I hope that's the worst one. These people are crazy.CURRY #2 - PHOENIX BBQ CHICKEN CURRY...Judge # 1 -- Smoky, with a hint of chicken. Slight chilli tang.Judge # 2 -- Exciting BBQ flavour, needs more peppers to be taken seriously.Judge # 3 -- Keep this out of the reach of children. I'm not sure what I'm supposed to taste besides pain. I had to wave off two people who Wanted to give me the Heimlich manoeuvre! They had to rush in more beer When they saw the look on my face.CURRY # 3 - SHAMILA'S FAMOUS "BURN DOWN THE GARAGE" CURRY...Judge # 1 -- Excellent firehouse curry. Great kick.Judge # 2 -- A bit salty, good use of chilli peppers.Judge # 3 -- Call 911. I've located a uranium spill. My nose feels like I have been snorting Drain Cleaner. Everyone knows the routine by now. Get me more beer before I ignite. Barmaid pounded me on the back, now my backbone is in the front part of my chest. I'm getting XXXXXXed from all the beer.CHILLI # 4 - BABOO'S BLACK MAGIC BEAN CURRY...Judge # 1 -- Black bean curry with almost no spice. Disappointing.Judge # 2 -- Hint of lime in the black beans. Good side dish for fish or other mild foods, not much of a curry.Judge # 3 -- I felt something scraping across my tongue, but was unable to taste it. Is it possible to burn out taste buds? Shareen, the beer maid, was standing behind me with fresh refills. That 200kg woman is starting to look HOT...just like this nuclear waste I'm eating! Is chilli an aphrodisiac?CHILLI # 5 LALL'S LEGAL LIP REMOVER...Judge # 1 -- Meaty, strong curry. Cayenne peppers freshly ground, adding considerable kick. Very impressive.Judge # 2 -- Average beef curry, could use more tomato. Must admit the chilli peppers make a strong statement.Judge # 3 -- My ears are ringing, sweat is pouring off my forehead and I can no longer focus my eyes. I farted and four people behind me needed paramedics. The contestant seemed offended when I told her that her chilli had given me brain damage. Shareen saved my tongue from bleeding by pouring beer directly on it from the pitcher. I wonder if I'm burning my lips off. It really XXXXXXes me off that the other judges asked me to stop screaming. Screw them.CHILLI # 6 - VERISHNEE'S VEGETARIAN VARIETY...Judge # 1 -- Thin yet bold vegetarian variety curry. Good balance of spices and peppers.Judge # 2 -- The best yet. Aggressive use of peppers, onions, and garlic. Superb.Judge # 3 -- My intestines are now a straight pipe filled with gaseous, sulphuric flames. I am definitely going to XXXXXX myself if I fart and I'm worried it will eat through the chair. No one seems inclined to stand behind me except that Shareen. Can't feel my lips anymore. I need to wipe my XXXXXX with a snow cone ice-cream.CHILLI # 7 - SELINA'S "MOTHER-IN-LAW'S-TONGUE" CURRY...Judge # 1 -- A mediocre curry with too much reliance on canned peppers.Judge # 2 -- Ho hum, tastes as if the chef literally threw in a can of chilli peppers at the last moment. (I should take note at this stage that I am worried about Judge # 3. He appears to be in a bit of distress as he is cursing uncontrollably).Judge # 3 -- You could put a grenade in my mouth, pull the pin, and I wouldn't feel a thing. I've lost sight in one eye, and the world sounds like it is made of rushing water. My shirt is covered with curry which slid unnoticed out of my mouth. My pants are full of lava to match my shirt. At least, during the autopsy, they'll know what killed me. I've decided to stop breathing - it's too painful. Screw it; I'm not getting any oxygen anyway. If I need air I'll just suck it in through the 4-inch hole in my stomach.CHILLI # 8 - NAIDOO'S TOENAIL CURLING CURRY...Judge # 1 -- The perfect ending. This is a nice blend curry. Not too bold but spicy enough to declare its existence.Judge # 2 -- This final entry is a good, balanced curry. Neither mild nor hot. Sorry to see that most of it was lost when Judge #3 farted, passed out, fell over and pulled the curry pot down on top of himself. Not sure if he's going to make it. Poor man, wonder how he'd have reacted to really hot curry?Judge # 3 - No Report.

Nigel Brooks ● 4823d6 Comments ● 4820d

West Ealing – Hanwell town centres new proposed traffic scheme.

The above proposes not less than six raised tables and a 20mph speed limit on the Uxbridge Road. This is Ealing’s main artery used not only by public transport, motorists, commercial vehicles and cyclists but also, more important, by all three emergency services. I wonder whether any of these vital services have been asked to take part on the initial design of the draft scheme.When few years back I was a member of the Specialist scrutiny panel set up to look at the 20 mph zones we were astonished to find out that emergency services were not consulted on the various schemes being implemented then.  When we asked the officer in charge of transport/traffic we were told that “they (the emergency services) always oppose these schemes” The reason for their opposition was that it slows down their response time. One of the Panel’s recommendation that was then included in the council policy that governs the implementation of the 20mph schemes, was that emergency services must be engaged.Historically all three services have had their base on the Uxbridge Road (Southall, Ealing and Acton Police stations, The Fire Services and Ealing's A&E as it allows them to respond promptly and quickly to any emergency that arises.I do hope that, if they have not yet been approached, at one point they will be asked to take part in the consultation and that their comments be taken on board. 

Rosa Popham ● 4863d8 Comments ● 4856d

Oversized recycling trucks causing damage

I stood and watched Ealings new Kerbsiders. probably the most dangerous and useless vehicles to be deployed on Ealings streets.Watching for the entire 20 mins it took the crew to cover just 100m of Chandos Avenue it is not difficult to see just how the recycling system is now so pi**poor.The vehicles are designed for wide roads with driveway parking to allow operatives to stay on the kerbside. Here they are being used in side streets barely wide enough to accomodate the vehicle.Consequently operatives have barely enough space to negotiate the loading side of the vehicle without clipping parked vehicles with the recycling bags and boxes.There is so little safe clearance that loaders have to place bags and boxes on parked vehicles or just do one bag or box at a time. Which clearly they now do.If you wondered where the scuffs and scratches on your car have come from look no further.In fact the operatives are very careful, clearly wary that these vehicles are dangerous to operate but this and care towards residents property has really slowed them up.Their wheelbase is too long for them to negotiate small streets easily. As are the new standard refuse trucks which have axle loads that exceed the loads recommended for victorian side street sewers, water mains and services.This is also a problem where raised crossings are placed on main roads. The resulting bounce caused by a bus or truck sends a shock wave several times the laden weight of the vehicle resulting in fractures to gas, water and sewer services.As usual, none of these factors have been considered in road projects or deployment of vehicles.But we really do need to know who the numbskull is that thought these machines would be a good idea.When the loader is operated, there is barely enough room for the operatives to keep clear it is an accident waiting to happen.It takes 4 times longer to load the vehicles and it is a very slow process.The loader comes perilously close to trees and street lights. In fact there is already visible marks of damage in Northfields and South ealing

Michael Brandt ● 4870d2 Comments ● 4870d

Colm Costello

Possibly as a result of his unfamiliarity with the areaand its history Cllr. Costello made a big mistake in tryingto play the Irish Card, in this particular part of London.All through from the 30's to the 60's at least, WestLondon in terms of the Great West Road Factories,The Western Avenue, Greenford with Lyons Rockwareand Glaxo etc, London Transport and others provided thousands of welcome jobs managerial, clerical,and manual  for Irish people wanting to avoid poverty and joblessness back home. Those thousands settled in Ealing, bought homes, and raised families many of whom still live in the Borough.And for all anyone can tell without ever being laughed at on account of being Irish , or of being "thick". And for the information of Cllr Costello the claim that there ever were " No Dogs No Irish" signs appears to be a fabrication.And of course this is hardly a recent phenomenon.the London Docks were mainly built by Irishlabourers who then settled in the area andwhose families were a foundation of the docklabour force.So scratch many Londoners and you won't need togo very deep to find some Irish blood.But of course the likes of a recent arrivalsuch as Colm Costello couldn't be expected to know that.Hence his surprise to discover that Cllr. Wall was in fact part Irish himself. Which apparently Cllr. Costellostill doesn't fully accept.Thus to many people of Irish descent, if not othersCllr Costello's ready resort to accusations of bigotry onthe part of Cllr Wall when this is totally unwarrented isdeeply offensive. One somehow suspects that Colm Costellohas led a relatively soft life, where prejudice andbigotry are things he's mainly read about in thebooks of his favourite author, Frank McCourt.Please don't forget that the only person on this forumwho has ever referred to the possibility of Irish peoplebeing described as "thick" is Colm Costello himself, postingas Mark Stevens. Nobody else. Everything else is a productof Costello's fevered imagination in posting bogusconversations between Mark Stevens and himself on thisforumSo that if there is any apologising to do to Irish people in general - as Costello was demanding of Cllr Wall, in the now sickening exchanges between Costelloand himself - then it is in fact Colm Costellowho needs to do the apologising.michael adams...

Michael Adams ● 4880d23 Comments ● 4872d

Do you Oppose Ealing hospital closure

Forwarding this message from 38 Degrees (See Acton W3 Website):This Wednesday could be an important day for the future of the NHS in Ealing. 38 Degrees members are getting together to decide what's next in the campaign to protect local health services. Could you come along?The details of the get-together are:19:00 - 20:00, Wednesday 5th DecemberSilva Cafe148 The BroadwayWest EalingHanwellW13 0TLDirections:"Silva Cafe (Caribbean & Latin American Cuisine) is on the Broadway which is a bit of Uxbridge Rd. It is about 10 blocks west of Northfields, just a little further west from West Ealing Library & Sainsbury's. Buses 207, 83 and E8 all run pass it."As well as helping to save the NHS, these get-togethers are a great chance to have a chat with other 38 Degrees members who live in Ealing.Right now, local doctors in Ealing are forming a Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG). This new group will have power to decide what health services you and your neighbours are able to access and who provides them.The doctors on Ealing CCG will be under pressure from the government to slash costs and hand out contracts to private companies. That could put vital services at risk.Wednesday evening's meeting will be a chance to plan things we can do to ask doctors in Ealing to use their new powers to protect our NHS, not privatise it. If we work together, we can make sure they hear from hundreds of local people as they make these crucial decisions.Elsewhere in the country these get-togethers have been well-attended. Could you come on Wednesday? https://secure.38degrees.org.uk/ealing-get-together

George Knox ● 4872d0 Comments ● 4872d

Two MORE centres disabled to close while Ealing Council spends half a million on a vanity sign

I just didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I read the stories in the Ealing. Gazette. Two more centres for the disabled (for those with learning difficulties) by Julian Bell our council leader (cry!) while half a million pounds has been spent on a new illuminated sign saying "Acton" hanging on a rail bridge over the road (cry!) that changes its colours once a week, or that someone had stolen the "A" from it (laungh) or that there was "fury" over this act (laugh). Who is furious? Not me. Time someone stood up to Bell and his second-rate crew who want to stamp out expression and comment by censoring the internet so that his voters cannot tell him what they think because he doesn't want to hear. That a Conservative councillor found a clever and legal way to have a snipe at him and his crew of incompetents through the Ealing Today Forum he has got endless time for (under the laws that let councils spy on many of us under the local authority surveillance powers). I can but wonder how many roads in Acton could have been resurfaced for half-a-million pounds? Instead we have a half-million-pound sign that welcomes you to a land of potholes. For that matter the fountain in Walpole Park could probably have been fixed for a hundredth of that cost. Perhaps Bell's time would be better spent looking at CCTV working out which of his council officers (salaried or elected) had not bothered to maintain or police the fountain pump in Walpole Park rather than "reviewing CCTV" footage to see who knicked the "A" from what has to be the ultimate vanity project in Ealing (after the Southall car park)!.

Philip K Screener ● 4881d12 Comments ● 4879d

Ealing's Labour Council to tax ill and disabled

Ill and disabled people are going to lose part of their council tax benefit from next year under government directives to make people on sickness and disability payments pay council tax. Even though Ealing Council is run by an elected Labour Council and the Labour Party have been condemning the Conservative Government welfare reforms they are going to be charging ill people who will receive no extra benefits to match this. Ealing residents who have been receiving Council Tax Benefit are being sent a letter for public consultation on a draft scheme that Ealing Council will be implementing for this.While the letter is headed up as coming from the "Benefits Service" of Ealing Council this is not the coming from the department which is intended to help those with benefits (that is another part of Ealing Council) it is, in fact, coming from the bit of the "Council Tax Collection" service that grudgingly deals with Council Tax Benefits.On first inspection it looks as if interacting with this consultation is going to be handled in the same even-handed way (not) that the tickets to Ealing Council's Olympic Torch Party in Walpole Park were distributed: in a way that the ill, disabled, or without the Internet are not able to access fully.No information about the proposed "New Tax" is being sent out, the letter directs those notified to either visit the Ealing Council website on www.ealing.gov.uk/consultations or to ring 0208 8825 7000 and choose option 5 (thats through a switchboard). This is hardly an inclusive or accessible path for many ill and disabled people in Ealing.The question is: is this an attempt by our Labour Council to get more money out of the ill and disabled by making it difficult for those affected to interact in the process and hence on the QT? I would like to see a pledge from our local Labour Party that those in Ealing will not pay any more than they would have before these changes.The letter reads thus:Benefits Serviceyour ref: (blank)case ref: (a number)date: 13-Aug-2012please ask for: (blank)direct line/ext (blank)Dear XXX,I am witing to inform you that the government has announced changes to Council Tax Benefit. From 1 April 2013, Council Tax Benefit, the current means of helping people on low incomes pay their council tax, will be replaced by a new localised Council Tax Support scheme.Certain vulnerable groups, such as pensioners, will not be affected by the changes. However, if you are a working age person currently in receipt of Council Tax Benefit it is likely that the proposed changes will directly affect you.Ealing Council has been working on designing a local scheme and is now carrying out a public consultation on its draft proposals. The consultation runs from 8 August 2012 to 3 October 2012. If you would like more details on:* Why the scheme is changing* Who will be affected by the changes* What the proposed changes are* How you can have your sayPlease visit our website: www.ealing.gov.uk/consultationsOrRing 020 8825 7000 and choose option 5.Yours SincerelyAnthony Walker.Ironically, the bottom of the piece of paper has two highly inappropriate logos on it: an "Investor in People" logo, and a "Positive About Disabled People" logo.

John Arthur Forest ● 4977d9 Comments ● 4894d

Richmond Council is holding a referendum on the expansion of Heathrow Airport

Conservative-run Richmond Council is holding a referendum on the expansion of Heathrow Airport. It will be held before May next year and other west London councils will be encouraged to take part.The Council Leader, Councillor Nicholas True, said:“Richmond Council has again taken a united stance on an issue where people rightly expect us to put aside party bickering in local politics. We are all elected to fight for our residents - and there is no issue more important to them than this."I deeply regret that the nightmare vision of Heathrow expansion that had been so wisely laid to rest by our Coalition government has been resurrected. This time we must kill it off for good. As far as this Council is concerned it will be all-out war with the big money interests and slick-suited PR men peddling this foolish project. It is perfectly possible to deliver increased airport capacity in south-east England without expanding Heathrow. No-one in their right minds would consider building a new airport on the Heathrow site today - that must surely go for a new runway, too."Frankly, Richmond and other west London residents have had enough. They have patiently borne the scourge of Heathrow, with all the noise, pollution and risks, for decades. In 2010 they were given hope of permanent relief from expansion - they trusted the word of those who gave that promise and it should not be broken. "As their elected representatives we are not prepared to sit meekly and take incoming fire from the Heathrow lobby without giving our residents the chance to hit back and have their say. The proposed ballot will give the long-suffering people of west London an unprecedented opportunity to shout loud and clear to those that run the airport, and anyone inside government who may support them, that Londoners simply won’t take it. I hope that other boroughs will join us.”The Mayor of London, Boris Johnson, added: “I warmly welcome the news of this ballot in Richmond. It is a positive step that people living in the vicinity of Heathrow and who would feel the impact of any expansion most acutely, are given an opportunity to have their opinions clearly heard. Londoners elected me on a platform of opposition to expansion at Heathrow and it is a mandate I am absolutely determined to defend. A third runway would mean more traffic, more noise, more pollution and a serious erosion in the quality of life for hundreds of thousands of people. We need to rule out this option once and for all and quickly take forward a bolder, longer term solution capable of supporting the needs of the capital, namely a new hub airport ideally to the east of London."Will Ealing Council follow Richmond's example ?

David Giles ● 4934d1 Comments ● 4933d

Coffee Shop Business for Sale

Hi all, not sure if this is the right location or even if it's allowed but I have a mobile coffee shop that's run successfully in Ealing for over six years. I'm expanding to fixed premises so I don't need my mobile business anymore. In a nutshell the business has earned me just over £30,000 per year pre tax profits (basically, my salary) for the last six years. I work from 8am until 1pm Monday to Friday. I am based entirely in Ealing and visit local businesses whose employees come out to pick up a freshly made espresso based coffee. The work's pleasant and easy. I keep fit and I'm outside in the fresh air rather than being stuck behind a desk.I am selling the van with all its fittings as a going concern – espresso machine, grinder, pie/croissant warmer, diesel generator, fridge, water butt, sink and work surfaces. Any stock I have is included in the price. • The van is valued at £3,500. It is a well looked after Mercedes Vito with only 32,000 miles on the clock (seven years old) with service history and new MOT and tax.• The diesel generator is valued at £3000. • The fit out on the van cost me £11,000.• The round is worth over £30,000 a year.I am willing to accept £15,000 for the business.If you think you might like a change of career or to go part time or to do something entirely different let me know by way of a post on here and I can arrange to meet you so you can see the business in action.

Darren Halford ● 4956d0 Comments ● 4956d

Non-Halal food at night, is there anywhere?

A lot has been said about what is wrong, what has changed for the worse, what race is to blame etc for drink related social problems, on another thread on this forum.So here is my view as a white working class person, on what has changed for the worse. I was brought up in West Ealing. My early drinking years (say 1978 onwards) Were, if I wanted Courage beers The Royal (already dying) and the Red Lion, both Boston Road, or the Foresters or the Grosvenor. For a penny extra, there was Fullers in the Plough, Northfields Ave.But more than that, if you left half hour before kicking out time there was the Chip shop, where you could buy savaloy & chips to soak up the beer on the way home. Not any more! The chip shops all seem to have to close by 21:30-22:00. Leaving us with only the fried chicken or kebab shops, all of which are Halal!! Well a lot of us out here refuse to eat halal, so you now have people who've been on the beer all evening, often drunk with no way of soaking up that beer until we get home, this will cause some behaviour problems in itself.So why have the non halal options been taken from us?That is in itself a reverse form of racism, it's eat halal or go without (McDonalds I refuse to see as real food, and the KFC sells halal without saying so).This sort of thing breed hatred and resentment of the muslim community. They can get a hot meal at night, but not anyone who doesn't eat halal food. Is there anywhere left that is non-halal for the after pub people who want something hot to eat? If not why not?

Leslie Bailey ● 4974d44 Comments ● 4960d

CYCLING 75 MILES...

... TO BEAT BLOOD CANCER On 1 April 2010, my son Jake was diagnosed with leukaemia. He was 20 years old. And suddenly the world went very dark indeed.    Even though he’s now in remission, 30,000 people every year in the UK get the same heart-stopping news. And go to that same dark place. That’s one person every 17 minutes. And I simply can’t just stand by and let that happen without trying to do something about it.  For the last two years, I’ve ridden the 52-mile London Bikeathon to raise as much money as possible for Leukaemia and Lymphoma Research. In that time, some amazingly generous people have helped me raise more than £4,500.  But knowing the nightmare that engulfed my boy for so long – and the dreadful pain he endured while he fought both the illness and the effects of the treatment – means that I can do nothing less than continue to ride against this truly awful disease.And this year I’m going the extra mile – well an extra 23 miles actually – by taking on the 75-mile Box Hill Endurance challenge. It takes place on 16 September and includes part of the Olympic cycling route. And Box Hill. A walk in the park it ain’t…These are difficult and uncertain times, but if any of you can donate even just a few pounds by going to http://www.justgiving.com/PaulHigham3 I’d be very grateful. OR DONATE BY TEXT It's really easy to donate by text too. And it's free! Just use the code JMGH55 and add the amount, then text to 70070 Please help us fight back. Help us beat this insidious, brutal and heart-breaking disease. Thank you so much And please forward this email to anyone you think might want to help. The more people who know about it, the better!Paul Higham(Goldsmith Avenue, Acton)

Paul Higham ● 4999d0 Comments ● 4999d

Human Right to claim benefits!!!

Newspaper article on Thursday 12 July.Human Rights law will be extended to include the right to claim benefits and enjoy a comfortable standard of living courtesy of the taxpayer under plans unveiled last night.A Government panel of experts is considering whether Labour's Human Rights Act - which is already hugely hugely controversial- should be extended to include so-called 'socio-economic rights'. This would allow the jobless to take the Government to court if ministers did not provide a minimum standard of living,Earlier this week, a report by the Josephh Rowntree Foundation suggested a family of four needed an income of almost £37,000 to have a satisfactory lifestyle.The 'Commission on a Bill of Rights' was set up by David Cameron to end the rampant abuse of human rights laws. Originally the PM had pledged to scrap Labour's Act and replace it with a UK Bill of Rights, which would stop the system being abused by criminals and those who refuse to work. But after being forced in to a coalition with the Lib Dems he had to downgrade his pledge, instead, he established the commission to decide the best way forward. Yesterday, despite deliberating for 15 months, the panel said it had not decided whether to recommend any change to the Act.The article goes on and on - but to get to the point - can we really afford to give the jobless a comfortable standard of living when money is tight and benefits are being cut for old and young alike?This Human Rights Law seems to have caused more problems than anything else! Surely something has got to give?

Jean F Fernandez ● 5015d32 Comments ● 5009d

Is it ok to imply the Irish are Thick

I went to a council meeting last night. I won't make that mistake again. If you have ever seen Prime Ministers Questions and didn't like it because of all the shouting and general childish behaviour, then you will hate this. I was expecting to hear a debate on compensating residents because of the poor service we now get from the rubbish collection company, but that never happened. There was a vote at the start of the meeting to change the agenda, then another vote after half eight and for some reason the debate never happened. I have no idea why. Anyways there was a debate where the Labour councillors who spoke praised themselves and the Conservative Councillors who spoke criticised them. Again, not sure what it was all about. I think Labour were saying this is how well we have done so far and the Conservatives said this is how bad you are. At one point in the debate, one of the Conservative Councillors spoke only to be mocked by one of the Labour ones who thought he would shout abuse at him in a mock Irish accent. The implication was that the Conservative Councillor didn't have a clue what he was talking about because he was Irish. Most of the Labour Councillors, not all, thought this was hilarious. I didn't. It may be that the Conservative Councillor is a bit thick, but to link this to his being Irish is not on. In this day and age, stereotying people like this is not on. For that reason, I won't be attending council meetings again.

Mark Stevens ● 5046d52 Comments ● 5011d

Tickets to see Claude Bourbon in Brentford this Friday!

Hi everyone, there's a competition on the front of BrentfordTW8.com to win tickets to this gig on Friday: Lovely to meet some of you at the Ian Mc Nabb gig the other week hopefully see you again on Friday - here are the details cut and pasted from the Brentford site:Claude Bourbon headlines his own show at Brentford's Docking Station on 20th July - this will be a fantastic night of acoustic music with special guests Andrew Prince and Anthea Neads, courtesy of Helen Martin Productions.From the press re Claude: "This finger picking guitarist has performed and studied all over the world; he has crafted an unbelievable fusion of classical and jazz, with ethereal Eastern influences, Spanish and Latin elements with strains of Western folk.…This accomplished artist offers tender, compelling performance through highly developed precision. His sound instantly creates ambience – from haunting Spanish moods to lyrical, romantic jazz, Claude Bourbon provides both a rich evening of music for lovers, and a real treat for music lovers…”, BBC, UK. Read more about him and listen to some of his music  here.Special guests Anthea Neads and Andy Prince will bring us an innovative mix of folk-rock, 60s psychedelia and contemporary influences, featuring striking vocals and lyrical basslines. See their website Anthea Neads and Andy Prince for music clips, album reviews and more!Tickets are £8 in advance and will be £10 on the door.e-mail info@helenmartinproductions for more information or to buy tickets in advance.To win a pair of tickets email info@neighbournet.com the answer to:Who is Claude's favorite British Guitarist?One winner from each of Brentford, Chiswick and Ealing sites will win a pair of tickets. Entrants must be registered with one of the sites.

Helen Martin ● 5011d0 Comments ● 5011d

Why pick on a soft touch?

Once again the story rolls on - some Conservative MP's are considering targeting pensioners by stopping the Freedom Pass, Fuel Allowance and free Prescriptions!I would love to see these MP's trying to live for a week or two on a pension, they would surely get a rude awakening. They live in luxury, have their subsidised meals, drinks, all sorts of perks. Chauffeur driven cars, home in the country for some, and at the end of their working life have a huge pension to look forward to.Compare that with a pensioner who has worked all their lives, sometimes for a miserable salary. Gordon Brown raided their pension funds. Inflation has reduced their little bit of savings. Council Tax, Lighting, Heating, Water Bills, plus the high cost of food and many are left with very little to live on.The Freedom Pass really is a Godsend for pensioners, it means that they are not forced to sit at home all day long with nothing to do. Instead they are able to get out and about, meet their friends, go to the library, or for hospital appointments. Without the Freedom Pass I can assure you that pensioners would suffer tremendously. Many would suffer from depression moping around the house all day, sometimes lonely old folk can go days without getting the change to speak to another person. Is this what our 'caring government' would wish for them? Pensioners have paid their dues to society and it is high time they received this little perk towards the end of their working life.As for Fuel Allowance, there have been many stories inthe press that some pensioners have in the past had to choose between eating and heating. With costs soaring due to greedy untility companies it is no wonder pensioners are finding it more problematic to keep their homes heated. Is this what our 'caring governbment' would wish for the older generation? No doubt MP's elderly relatives are well cared for and well heeled!Then we come on to prescriptions, as one gets older there is a greater chance that health conditions mean more visits to the GP and more medication. Why should pensioners be expected to fork out the high price for prescriptions? If this were to happen many pensioners would just go without their medication and end up in hospital which would cost the NHS much more in the long run.Why for instance are prescriptions free in Wales and as far as I am aware in Scotland and Northern Ireland? Can this be fair? I have also heard that pensioners living in Southern Ireland are well catered for. The pensions in this country are lower than in most other European countries. Not something to be proud of.There are so many ways the government can save money but targetting a soft touch like Pensioners is really disgraceful! They say it would cost more money if these benefits were means tested, so why bother?Instead concentrate on the Quangoes, The Pen Pushers in the NHS and other areas. The advisers - why on earth do these people who are supposed to be capable of running the country need so many advisers? Haven't they got the brains to work things out themselves?The NHS could save BILLIONS if only they would stop trying to deliver free treatment to the entire world. Check who is entitled to receive treatment, or ensure that the patient is intending to pay for his/her care. A number of NHS hospitals are close to going into administration because of mismanagement. Sack the Managers!We are also spending a fortune on overseas aid, even when countries say they don't want our money, still we insist on handing it over! Most of the money probably ends up in the hands of those in power. I doubt the people living in those countries feel the benefit! We also give huge amounts to the IMF - aiding countries like Argentina, Greece, Spain - you name it!Bring our troops home from Afganistan, what on earth they are doing there God only knows. It must be like trying to train a Rotweiller, and for what? Stop reducing our Army to save money and then relying on the TA. Labour even closed our local TA in Horn Lane some years ago and sold the land to build flats!Can we not have someone running this once great country of ours who actually cares about our own people?We are so generous to anyone and everyone who comes to these shores, whether or not they are a deserving case, whether or not they wish us well or wish us harm. Surely if money is tight we cannot continue like this? Why pick on the pensioners weho have worked all their lives and end up trying to live from day to day on a miserly pension?If the Conservatives once again wish to be known as the 'Nasty Party' then they are certainly going the right way about it. If they decide to target pensioners in this fashion then I for one will never ever vote for them again.Sorry for the rant but someone has to say it

Jean F Fernandez ● 5018d28 Comments ● 5017d

London Riots Aftermath

There was an excellent programme on BBC3 last night which centred on the aftermath of the London Riots and followed both the victims AND the perpetrators.2x Ealing people were featured - Leni Hazlitt, whos flat above the Londis store was burnt out, and Zakar Hussain, who had put his life savings into the Mango Café which was flooded due to the water pumped into the adjacent buildings. Both of whom are still struggling almost a year on, which makes me feel sick and is WRONG!How can we let this happen to our community ? OK, whilst the riots were in full flow there was little that we could do apart from wait for the authorities to restore order, but afterwards - we could have and should have done more. I was touched by the numbers that went to Ealing to help with the clean up. But seeing people like Leni and Zakar still suffer is wrong (and there are more people – e.g. owners of the Londis store who I understand are on the breadline). We should be lobbying MP's to push insurance companies or whatever is in the way of getting these peoples’ lives back to where they were before the riots. Or should we ? Are our MP’s doing us a service if they’re not spending every waking hour working for their constituents ? They’re quick enough to tell us what we want to hear in those dark days in order to score political points, but for me, actions count!! All I see from these people are irritating posts on Ealing Today / Twitter about the rubbish situation where they're trying to point score off one another. This is nothing in comparison to people who’s quality of life has been compromised.I want to see an MP who cares - genuinely cares. Who'll go the extra mile for his constituents. Who'll roll their sleeves up and do the dirty work. Who'll creat whatever shit storm is required to get the right focus. Sadly, with the wet blankets we have in power in Ealing, I do not feel that we have that person.Am I wrong in saying that we have forgotten about the riots and those that have been affected ?

Bud Richards ● 5018d10 Comments ● 5017d

Can you spare an hour in Ealing to help OPEN Ealing and Books for London between now and Tuesday?

Hi everyone!Can you spare an hour or two in Ealing to help us out between now and Tuesday?Next week is moving week! Books for London (http://www.booksforlondon.org.uk/) have been storing about 12,000 or so books at the top of the OPEN Ealing community centre since last November, but it’s now time for them to go, as they won’t all fit into OPEN’s new premises when the move this summer.We’ve arranged with Read International for their partner, Better World Books to take these away for us this Monday and Tuesday. They will then be sold on, with the money going to Read International, to support their great work in bringing education and literacy to Africa.Unfortunately, moving these books requires a lot of work, and we need help! We need volunteers to:-Help attach tracking stickers to 550 boxes of books at OPEN Ealing this weekend – without these, the books could get lost, and Read International will lose out. Saturday and Sunday, 3-6 pm-Help us to load these onto Better World Books’ truck  – Monday and Tuesday, 3-6pm (this will be from OPEN’s ground floor, rather than the 6th floor like last time!)This will all be happening at OPEN Ealing, 113 Uxbridge Road, Ealing W5 5TL(5-7 min walk from Ealing Broadway station or West Ealing station)This is a very big job, and we need loads of help to make it a small one! If you can help, please email us at londonbookswap@gmail.com,or Tweet us at @BooksforLondon.

Chris Gilson ● 5029d0 Comments ● 5029d

It's your duty to AVOID paying tax LAWFULLY

I am starting to get sick and tired of Government ministers (Lib Dems actually), the Labour Party and jealous tax payers who constantly attack those that can lawfully avoid paying tax on their income. It's a ludicrous state of being when somehow it has become an inalienable moral duty to give the state, or politicians, your hard earn fruits of your labour! How mad have we become?Danny Alexander has said that millionaires who use lawful schemes to avoid income tax are the ‘moral equivalent of benefit cheats'.What a fool. What's the difference between a multimillionaire and a benefit recipient - one contributes to society the other takes from it. To make any connection shows how morally bankrupt the Lib Dems truly are.Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161852/Jimmy-Carr-Stars-avoid-tax-better-benefit-cheats-says-Danny-Alexander.html#ixzz1yK8cbZtPWe all know the state is absolutely crap at managing and running anything properly. It is management heavy, stuck in its old ways and dominated by Unions. The state education system fails hundreds of thousands every year, the health service kills thousands every year, we have an over weight police force, a prison system not fit for purpose and we engaged in an illegal war costing billions. We make U-turns on aircraft carriers that cost £250 million, we make constant changes to IT systems costing billions that are then abandoned. We pay the feckless to not work, we have created a culture where an estimated 600,000 in England alone are "super obese" - that's worse than morbid - a gluttonous drain on the public purse. All paid for by those millionaires who pay their "fair share". The top 1% of earners pay 30% of all income tax - tell me, how is that not paying your fair share?I say it's your duty to pay what you HAVE too and no more. If you can lawfully avoid tax it's your duty to do so.

Cllr Benjamin Dennehy ● 5039d34 Comments ● 5037d

Bike Week in Ealing

Here's a run down of bike events that Ealing Cycling Campaign will be running over the course of next week:-Sat 16 June  Doctor Bike and Stall.Ealing Green. From 10am until 4pm. Join us on Ealing Green, at the bottom of Bond Street where Doctor Bike will be present to check over your bike and resolve any minor problems plus advice on all things cycling, cycle maps & leaflets etcSun 17June Family Ride Suitable for families with small children. Short ride to a local leisure spot. Bring a picnic. Depart 10am Ealing Town Hall steps, return 4pm-ish.Wed 20 June Sunset Ride Gentle ride along the river to watch the Sun go down from Richmond Hill. Remember to bring your bike lights. Meet outside Ealing Town Hall. Depart 7pm. Sat 23 June     Doctor Bike and StallActon Park   From 11am until 3pm. Join us in Acton Park by the cafe, where Doctor Bike will be present to check over your bike. Plus advice, leaflets and cycle maps from our information stall. Sun 24 June    Gentle Ride for Children and Beginners Suitable for families with small children. Quiet route to a local Park. Bring a picnic. Depart 10am Ealing Town Hall steps, return 3pm. In addition to the events above provided by Ealing Cycling Campaign, the Council will be providing the following Doctor Bike sessions.Sunday 17 June: Southall Park 12-3pmMonday 18 June: Greenford Town Centre 4pm-7pm Tuesday 19 June: Haven Green 4pm-7pm Wednesday 20 June: Hanwell ClockTower 4pm-7pm Thursday 21 June: Acton Town Centre 4pm-7pm Friday 22 June: Melbourne Avenue, West Ealing 4pm-7pm Saturday 23 June: Southall Park 2pm -5pm Happy cycling!

Ben Owen ● 5044d1 Comments ● 5044d

Anesthetized Democracy at local Government is OK.?

We do have Parliamentary Democracy at Government Level . At local leval we should have more of an egalitarian Democracy.Citizens living in local communities should have the power and the voice to raise issues and be heard on all issues that confront the individual before action is considered.We do not have that.Freedom belongs to Groups that peddle their self Interest. Benifits are decided on a priority basis in the UK.so if some one from abroad is registered in, they are promptly prioritised  over the person or persons who had made application for help with say just two or three children. Guess who jumps the queue? IF this process is repeated it is easy to work out the frustation of the waiting family.Can they raise a voice ?.The Southall area committees have been abandoned, for wards . Many a time I have arrived to find No local Councillor turns up at ward meetings. I am told that two councillors are not even known by anybody. Does anybody Care? This cannot go on for long. Something must give. All over West london particularly Ealing's Borders remain Testimony to neglect.Granted; our resources are scarce, but who are we to share it with.? The Super rich Un-Touchables have the power to own more of everything we once ownned  .The NEEDY in our midst are falling prey to the GREEDY.....and we may say nothing about it ? I am sad to find so much stress among our once happy neighbours. Can we dare to hope that People will see the necessity for Change .?

Os A Whittle ● 5044d1 Comments ● 5044d

Street cleaning - the facts!

It has taken not less than 37 written questions presented at the special council meeting by Conservatives councillors - on top of oral questions made on the night from opposition members - to   Cllr Mahfouz, to have an idea of how he is really performing as Cabinet member for Transport and EnvironmentIn last week Gazette he proudly claimed that he had “achieved the highest ever rate of recycling and street cleaning”.  Although recycling figures are now around the 44% rates perhaps he should have given credit to the efforts of residents rather than on himself, considering that hardly any new recycling initiative has come forward from this current administration. However the street cleaning figures do present a sorry state of affair and the reality is indeed different from the picture he describes – as we didn’t know ourselves by looking at the sorry state of our streets and road.Asked how many streets were graded A, B, C by the street monitoring team in the month of April and how did this compared with April 2011, the answer was as follows:Grade A:         2,960 (2012)   - 12,750 (2011)Grade B:       790     “     -         444      “Grade C:          681     “     -         313      “Grade D             7     “     -           0      “It doesn’t take someone with a Maths degree to work out that from April 2011 to April 2012 only around a third of streets have been assessed compared to the same period in the previous year. It is also telling that Grade D (which is the worst grade possible) has also made a comeback in 2012. However, these figures clearly demonstrate that that our streets are getting dirtier by the year and that Cllr Mahfouz is being quite economic with the truth. Other questions put to him reveal that fly tips are up as well: from 277 in April 2011 to 344 in April 2012.  Perhaps this is as direct result of cutting the envirocrime officers from 23 in April 2010 down to 13 posts in April 2012, as well as cuts in the street monitoring team: from 7 to 5 during the same period.Considering that one of the key priorities of this administration is “Making Ealing cleaner” and the fact that both last year and this year, and they are proposing to do the same for next year, they have budgeted to underspend £9M per year, are cuts to the above services justifiable or justified?To prioritise something means to put more resources into it, not cutting it!In the wave of the recent recycling and refuse contract fiasco and considering the above, it is time for Cllr Mahfouz and his administration to stop treating us like children by telling us what they think we may want to hear rather than how things really are. They need to come clean and be transparent if they want to regain some sort of credibility from their residents.

Rosa Popham ● 5069d8 Comments ● 5049d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult 14years+ beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday 08:00pm-9:30pm.  Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

Waseem Nayyer ● 5061d0 Comments ● 5061d

Planning appeal dismissed - a great relief!

I don't have a link for the document, so I have copied the dismissal of the appeal in full. This is in South Acton, just off Acton Lane, very close to the Chiswick border.I thought this document would be of interest to anyone else fighting over-development in their area. The applicant want to convert this single-dwelling "uncharacteristically shallow" double-fronted house into 4 flats. Many neighbours on the two roads affected by the application objected to both the original application and the appeal, due to the many reasons explained in the document below (mainly over-development of the site creating cramped living conditions, poor design, very little outdoor space and parking pressures). In the Inspector's own words "the current proposal would result in an unsatisfactory cramped and oppressive environment for its occupants".We were very relived today to be informed today that, after a site visit only 13 days ago, HM Inspectorate in Bristol dismissed the appeal, and therefore agreed with Ealing Council's original refusal to grant the application. Appeal DecisionSite visit made on 8 May 2012by Elizabeth Lawrence BTP MRTPIan Inspector appointed by the Secretary of State for Communities and Local GovernmentDecision date: 21 May 2012Appeal Ref: APP/A5270/A/12/216797145 Leythe Road, London, W3 8AW.The appeal is made under section 78 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990against a refusal to grant planning permission.The appeal is made by Mr M Gahir against the decision of the Council to the LondonBorough of Ealing.The application Ref P/2011/3028, dated 11 July 2011, was refused by notice dated 25October 2011.The development proposed is conversion of existing double fronted single dwellinghouse into 4 self contained flats.••••Preliminary matters1. The Appellant has suggested that the room sizes in the flats could be changed.However no revised plans have been submitted and any such changes wouldfirst need to be formally considered by the Council. Accordingly and for theavoidance of doubt I confirm that this decision is based upon the submittedscheme.Decision2. The appeal is dismissed.Main Issue3. The main issue is whether the proposed flats would provide satisfactory livingconditions for their occupants.Reasons4. Eight days after the Appeal application was submitted The London Plan 2011was adopted and its policies and advice were therefore applicable to theproposal. Policy 3.5 of The London Plan states that Local DevelopmentFrameworks should incorporate minimum space standards that generallyconform to table 3.3 of The London Plan. It goes on to state that the minimumspace standards set out in table 3.3 are set as the minimum for dwellings ofdifferent sizes and that boroughs should seek to ensure that new developmentreflects these standards. The objective of this policy is to improve the qualityof homes in London.www.planningportal.gov.uk/planninginspectorateAppeal Decision APP/A5270/A/12/21679715. The Council’s Supplementary Planning Guidance 14 (SPG14) includes lowerminimum space standards and remains a material consideration. However itwas published several years ago and is for guidance purposes only. ConverselyThe London Plan is up-to-date and forms part of the development plan for thearea. As stated in paragraph 196 of the National Planning Policy Framework(NPPF), applications for planning permission must be determined in accordancewith the development plan, unless material considerations indicate otherwise.6. The Appellants Appeal statement states that flats one and two would besuitable for single persons, although the submitted design and accessstatement indicates that they could each accommodate between one and twopersons. Having regard to the size of the proposed bedrooms in flats one andtwo they could be occupied by two persons each. The first floor two bedroomflat would have two double bedrooms and could be occupied by up to fourpersons. The attic flat would have an open plan bed/living area and couldreadily be described as a single person unit.7. With the Appeal scheme all of the flats would fall below the minimum floor-space standards set out The London Plan and only the loft flat would complywith the minimum floor-space standard set out in SPG14. Overall the floor-space would be in excess of 27m2 below the minimum standards set out in TheLondon Plan and 12m2 below those in SPG14.8. At the same time the hallway and bathrooms serving flats one and two, thelobby to flat three and the stairs and landings would be devoid of natural lightand ventilation. The kitchen area to flat three would be reliant on secondarylight and the living rooms and kitchen areas to flats one and two would have anorth westerly aspect and despite the proposed roof lights would receive littlesunlight. Also their outlook would be directly at the boundary with 31 NewtonAvenue. Whilst this boundary is currently open, to protect the living conditionsof the occupants of the proposed flats and the residents at 31 Newton Road atall fence or wall would need to be provided.9. The Council’s SPG13 – Garden Space advises that all residential developmentshould provide private garden space in addition to appropriate landscaping andchildren’s play space. A communal garden area of 75m2 should be providedin conversion schemes for up to five flats and such space should be screenedfrom public roads, footpaths and ground floor windows. Ground floor flatsshould have private gardens where there is at least 3 metres between thewindows and the boundary screening. Following the construction of a singlestorey rear extension the rear garden of the Appeal property has been reducedto a maximum depth of 2.5 metres and one of the rear windows would be only1.5 metres from the rear boundary. Not only would the outlook from the rearwindows be poor the garden area would be confined and would be over-shadowed at most times.10. The front garden would be fully utilised for access to the flats and theassociated refuse and recycling storage areas and neither of the upper floorflats would have any usable private garden area. This is despite the fact thatthe first floor flat would have the potential to be occupied by a family.11. SPG13 states that in town and neighbourhood centres the full standard forgarden space can be relaxed, provided well designed, sunny sitting out space isAppeal Decision APP/A5270/A/12/2167971provided. However, in this instance the site is not within a defined town orneighbourhood centre and the space provided is poorly designed, largely over-shadowed and would only serve two of the four flats.12. The Appellant has indicated that a contribution could be made towards theprovision and/or improvement of public open space within the area. Howeveras no details or legal agreement to secure such provision are provided noweight can be given to this factor.13. Although there are a number of public open spaces within the area, the closestbeing some 130 metres from the Appeal site, the site is located within both anarea of Existing District Park Deficiency and Local Park Moderate Deficiency. Atthe same time the availability of public open space in the area does not addressthe need for private garden space. The poor quality and inadequate provisionof private garden space would result in a poor living environment for theoccupiers of the proposed flats, which would not be adequately compensatedfor by the proximity of the local areas of public open space.14. The main entrance to the flats and the proposed refuse and recycling areas toserve all the flats would be located immediately outside the bedroom windowsto the ground floor flats. This could result in noise, odour and disturbance forthe occupants of those flats. As with the restricted private garden space thesefactors highlight and exacerbate the cramped nature of the scheme and theoppressive environment it would result in for the occupants of thedevelopment.15. For these reasons the scheme would fail to comply with policy 5.5 of theLondon Borough of Ealing Unitary Development Plan 2004 (UDP). This policystates that residential development should provide good living conditions forresidents, including an attractive outlook, adequate indoor living space,adequate sunlight and daylight and adequate play space for children.16. The need for one and two bedroom flats in the borough is fully appreciated andis a matter to which I attach considerable weight. However, it is also importantthat the standard of accommodation provided in any development issatisfactory if it is to meet the needs and expectations of its occupants. In thisinstance, the current proposal would result in an unsatisfactory cramped andoppressive environment for its occupants.17. The Appellant has referred to a number of flats schemes in the locality.However from the details submitted none appear to be directly comparable tothe Appeal scheme in relation to location, plot size, the size and orientation ofthe gardens and the nature and size of the flats. As such they do not set aprecedent for the Appeal proposal which has been assessed on its individualmerits.18. Finally, as a single dwelling occupied by a large family, or in multi-occupation,the use of the Appeal property would be less intensive than if it was occupiedfor four independent flats with nine bed-spaces.19. I conclude on the main issue that the proposed flats would provideunsatisfactory living conditions for their occupants. As such the scheme wouldconflict with policy 3.5 and table 3.3 of The London Plan, policy 5.5 and table5D of the UDP and the advice set out in SPG 13 and SPG14. It would alsoAppeal Decision APP/A5270/A/12/2167971conflict with paragraphs 56 and 58 of the NPPF which deal with the design andfunctioning of the built environment.Other matters20. The Appeal site is uncharacteristically shallow and despite its double frontage ismore intensively developed than the majority of residential properties in thelocality. Although some of the dwellings in the road have been converted toflats none appear to be used for four flats and they have larger private gardenareas than the Appeal property. Not only would the proposed scheme providecramped living conditions for its occupants, the intensity and density of the usewould be totally out of keeping with the surrounding area. The front gardenarea would be dominated by refuse and recycling facilities and the two reargardens would be extremely cramped both visually and in terms of use.21. Any activity within the flats would be unlikely to generate a significant amountof noise and disturbance. However the coming and going of four householdswould be evident and would highlight the intensive nature of the scheme.Also, some of the proposed refuse and recycling bins would be sited justoutside the front living room window of 43 Leythe Road and their use wouldresult in noise, smell and loss of privacy for the occupants of that property22. Overall the scheme would fail to respect and would detract from the characterand appearance of the street scene and the living conditions of the occupantsof 43 Leythe Road. On their own these matters would not amount to reasonsfor dismissing this Appeal, however they highlight and exacerbate the crampedand unsatisfactory nature of the development.23. Policy 9.8 of the UDP encourages low car housing in areas where there arecontrolled parking zones, which includes Leythe Road. This is on the basis thatthe developer undertakes to form or contribute to a City Car Club and thatresidents of the scheme contribute to its management. Alternatively a “low carhousing clause” could be entered into which would prevent the occupants of thedevelopment from purchasing residents’ permit.24. The proposal provides no on-site parking and no legal agreement has beensubmitted relating to the formation or contribution to a City Car Club. Althoughthe Appellant has indicated that they would be willing to enter into a legalagreement to limit the application for parking permits no such agreement hasbeen submitted. On the contrary the Appellant has confirmed that the propertyalready benefits from two residents parking permits. As such the proposalwould conflict with policy 9.8 of the UDP.25. The area in which the Appeal site is located is congested and the availability ofon-street parking to meet the needs of the occupants of all of the dwellings inLeythe Road is limited. Consequently without a legal agreement in placerelating to either a City Car Club or a restriction on parking permits theproposal would unacceptably increase the pressure for on-street parking in thevicinity. This would have an adverse effect on the free flow of traffic, whichwould have an unacceptable impact on highway safety and would materiallydetract from the living conditions of existing residents, due to noise,disturbance and the reduced availability of on-street parking.Appeal Decision APP/A5270/A/12/216797126. Drainage, including drainage within the building is a matter that is dealt withunder the Building Regulations and any issues regarding ownership are aprivate legal matter. Finally any concerns regarding the handling of theAppeal application by the Council fall outside the scope of this Appeal, whichdeals solely with the planning merits of the proposed scheme.Conclusion27. Whilst I have found in favour of the Appellant on some points my conclusion onthe main issue and my findings in relation to character and appearance,parking and the living conditions of the occupier of 43 Leythe Road amount tocompelling reasons for dismissing this Appeal. These matters could not besatisfactorily addressed by the imposition of conditions.Elizabeth LawrenceINSPECTOR

Jennifer Monaghan ● 5068d0 Comments ● 5068d

Live debate TONIGHT on same sex marriage in Chiswick...

Dear all!Please mark and reserve an important date for your diaries!On Monday 30th April 2012 at Gunnersbury Baptist Church in Chiswick, there will be an exciting and relevant, free public debate on the subject of the Governments recent proposals to redefine marriage to incorporate same-sex couples.Two top-class speakers with differing opinions will discuss this very important topic.1) Adrian Trett is Chair of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) + Liberal Democrats since the Coalition Government was formed, and the author of the original motion on Equal Marriage in the UK for Liberal Democrat Conference in 2010. His campaigning group has been working with our Liberal Democrat Ministers, in particular Lynne Featherstone MP to enable this issue to be brought on to the Government's agenda, now with the public consultation and hopefully for legislation to be passed by 2015 to enable equal marriage in the UK.2) Rev. David Robertson is the Pastor of St. Peters Free Church in Dundee. He is the Author of 'The Dawkins Letters' and regular conference speaker and debater for the Evangelical Christian Church. There will be a chance, during this debate for questions from the audience.Doors will open at 7.00 pm for a 7.30 pm start. Entrance to this debate is absolutely free although early arrival is recommended.Watch out for the formal publicity - fliers and posters!I hope you will support this important event,Many thanks,Laurence TruettDebate Coordinator07807003553

Laurence Truett ● 5090d2 Comments ● 5075d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult 14years+ beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday 08:00pm-9:30pm.  Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

Waseem Nayyer ● 5075d0 Comments ● 5075d

Tube works near Ealing Common

For around the last month or so, TFL have decided that the track between Turnham Green and Ealing Broadway needs work. This work has been taking place in evenings and gets particularly loud on bank holiday weekends. I live alongside the tube line, right opposite Ealing Common station (as I am sitting here at 12.30 at night, there is currently 7 workers and a JCB around 50 yards from my ground floor bedroom window) The workers seem to have no concept of the fact it's late at night, and are shouting loudly to one another. Things were even worse this morning at 5.45am (on a Saturday) when they were out there with a chainsaw of some kind - Not the nicest thing to wake up to when you're looking forward to a lie in after a week of work!I understand that works on the tube line need to be done, but doing them at such unsocial hours is completely unfair. I'm getting very little sleep because of it, and can only imagine what a nightmare it must be for couples nearby with children. Surely it must be breaking some sort of environmental law regarding noise pollution?I was wondering if anyone else is being effected by these works in the same way? I have taken photos and been making notes of the antisocial times work has been carried out. If you have taken any action against it, please let me know. I am going to try and compile a list of residents that have been effected, as I feel that several names should get my complaint further than just mine.Thanks,Andrew

Andrew Butler ● 5084d5 Comments ● 5081d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult 14years+ beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday 08:00pm-9:30pm.  Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

Waseem Nayyer ● 5083d0 Comments ● 5083d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult 14years+ beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday 08:00pm-9:30pm.  Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

Waseem Nayyer ● 5089d0 Comments ● 5089d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday.  Next session is on Monday the 16th of April 08:30pm-10pm.  From May its going to be 8pm-9:30pm. Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

Waseem Nayyer ● 5091d0 Comments ● 5091d

Recycling uncollected AGAIN

Around here (around St Mary's / South Ealing) once again the black sacks have been collected on the correct day (Tuesday) during the morning, but NONE of the recycling has been. A fortnight ago the recycling was collected just before dusk and last week it was done during lunchtime by operatives who really were not happy at doing it. This week we seem to be back to what now passes for normal - no recycling collection - and the foxes will have a fine time tonight redistributing everything all over the pavements and gardens.I really believe that the Council has truly fouled up the contract with Enterprise and that in reality they are only supposed to collect the black sacks - witness the lack of proper recycling vehicles and everything being dumped in standard rear platform compacting lorries as previously reported. Indeed on the first week of the new regime operatives collecting black sacks were heard to mutter along the lines of "what are we supposed to do with all this stuff?".This appalling mess has been going on for nearly a month now and it is time questions were asked in high places and for those responsible to be called upon to resign. I have no confidence in the Council's repeated assurances that these are merely teething troubles, nor in the assertions that recycling is not going to landfill. In my view it is time for the "opposition" to call a vote of "No Confidence" in the ruling group and to re-instate the previous contractors - at least then we might return to having a clean and pleasant borough.

Russell Maiden ● 5095d8 Comments ● 5094d

Live marriage debate this Monday in Chiswick...

On Monday 30th April 2012 at Gunnersbury Baptist Church in Chiswick, there will be an exciting and relevant, free public debate on the subject of the Governments recent proposals to redefine marriage to incorporate same-sex couples.Two top-class speakers with differing opinions will discuss this very important topic.1) Adrian Trett is Chair of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) + Liberal Democrats since the Coalition Government was formed, and the author of the original motion on Equal Marriage in the UK for Liberal Democrat Conference in 2010. His campaigning group has been working with our Liberal Democrat Ministers, in particular Lynne Featherstone MP to enable this issue to be brought on to the Government's agenda, now with the public consultation and hopefully for legislation to be passed by 2015 to enable equal marriage in the UK.2) Rev. David Robertson is the Pastor of St. Peters Free Church in Dundee. He is the Author of 'The Dawkins Letters' and regular conference speaker and debater for the Evangelical Christian Church. There will be a chance, during this debate for questions from the audience.Doors will open at 7.00 pm for a 7.30 pm start. Entrance to this debate is absolutely free although early arrival is recommended.Watch out for the formal publicity - fliers and posters!I hope you will support this important event,Many thanks,Laurence TruettDebate Coordinator

Laurence Truett ● 5096d0 Comments ● 5096d

Live Kidney Donation - Please help increase awareness to save my mum and patients like her :)

Hello everyone,My mother has recently been diagnosed with end stage renal failure and is in need for a transplant. Last night I made a facebook page to try and increase awareness of live kidney donation in the hope of finding my mum a donor. I realise this is quite an unconventional approach but I have been overwhelmed by the response from my friends offering to be considered as donors and helping spread the word.I am not a regular user of Twitter but made an account today to try and spread the message even further than my Facebook network. As you can appreciate I will do anything to try and save my mum. So, I thought I would post the link on here too. We have lived in West London for about 30 years and mums renal team are based at Hammersmith Hospital. I was hoping that perhaps some of you might be willing to help increase awareness of live kidney donation by posting the FB page I have created for my mum on your own walls and Twitters (link below) or anywhere you can think of, in the hope of finding a donor for my mum and for patients like her. I think this is so important as not many people actually know they could be considered as donors and if they did, perhaps we could reduce the suffering people experience waiting for years on dialysis and save more lives. People don't realise that living with one kidney does not mean that life will be any different to what it would be with two.The link below takes you to the page I created if you are interested in helping out and I am contactable on http://www.facebook.com/TalulahDelilahhttp://www.facebook.com/pages/Help-find-a-living-kidney-donor-for-my-mum/345334168849821Thank you so much for taking time to read this.Natalia

Delilah Natalia ● 5100d0 Comments ● 5100d

For the record - Greenford is actually part of the London Borough of Ealing

I have always been aware that some people have a poor opinion of Greenford, the area I've lived in for over twenty years, but the disdain and snobbery with which it is regarded by certain residents of central Ealing has become painfully clear recently. Over the last few days I have been engaged in a "discussion" on Twitter by someone who responded to a comment I made regarding the potential impact of HS2 on Greenford. I was under the impression that he didn't even live in the country because his knowledge of the area was so vague. He also seemed to think that high speed rail would benefit W7 and W13 postcodes, when it won't stop anywhere in the borough. In fact it affects UB6. When I pointed this out he told me that Greenford was part of Uxbridge!This may seem trivial but it turns out that this person lives in West Ealing, around three miles from Greenford. I have struggled to find much hyperlocal interaction in my area, which is very quiet in this respect compared to central Ealing, and am concerned that those whose comments about Greenford do make it online will dominate the debate. I am also angry that anyone feels qualified to comment on issues that will have a profound effect on an area they've clearly never visited.So, for the benefit of this person (whose ears are surely burning after the discussion I had about them last night):1. Greenford may have a UB6 postcode but it is part of your borough, along with Southall, Acton, Perivale and Northolt.2. You said that you know enough about Greenford to know that it needs improving. I walk past the end of your street to mine most weekday evenings and I only feel at risk from violence, dealers and drunks at your end. 3. Horsenden Hill is at least a quarter of a mile from the HS2 route. Perivale Wood, the second oldest nature reserve in the UK, is not and is at risk from HS2. 4. The neighbouring borough will benefit from employment created by HS2, not Ealing. Our borough will experience traffic congestion, noise and dirt as well as loss of trade and income. Who will want to stay in the hotels at Hanger Lane if the work is carried out 24 hours a day? 5. Crossrail may increase the value of your home because it will stop in West Ealing. Lucky you. HS2 will trash the value of mine. I will gain nothing from it.  6. Greenford may have a lot of warehouses and traffic. It also has Horsenden Hill, an ancient church, eighteenth and nineteenth century buildings and a music heritage worth bragging about.Finally I would ask residents of Greenford to stand up for themselves and our area. Don't let the snobs shout you down.

Albertina McNeill ● 5103d7 Comments ● 5100d

FREE collection of Garden Waste

Although I am not a subscriber to the garden waste service, my street's garden refuse, left in old pink bags, was collected free of charge this morning. Wednesday is our regular refuse / recycling day.I've been forwarded the following statement by Cllr Gary Malcolm, which comes from Keith Townsend, Ealing Council's Executive Director for Customer Services, which I'm sure will be of interest to all Ealing's residents. I have edited it ever so slightly."Hopefully I can clarify the situation. Any garden waste presented should be collected on [your normal] collection days irrespective of whether a resident has subscribed to green bags.  What is supposed to happen is that anyone who has not subscribed to the service should be given a card to explain how to do so, although in the difficult couple of weeks we had, I would be surprised if this happened consistently.  This arrangement will be in place until the end of April.  The arrangements from May are that for  those residents who opt not to subscribe, their garden waste will not be collected.  At this stage, there are no plans to alter that arrangement, although it will be kept under review. However, if anyone has experienced missed collections, the same message applies i.e. leave the recycling out".  Cllr Gary Malcolm would like to be e-mailed of any problems that you may have with your garden waste not being recycled. Hiss e-mail address is Gary.Malcolm@ealing.gov.uk

Ben Owen ● 5101d0 Comments ● 5101d

Ball/street hockey (children and adult beginners programme)

West London Ball Hockey Club presents this exiting new sport to the local community of Ealing.  "something different"  "Important:  We play with trainers not roller blades"We have just moved into this new facility  "Elthorne Sports Centre. Westlea Road, off Boston Road, Hanwell W7 2AD".This sport is hugely famous in Canada, Czech and Slovak. Our Values are; Respect, Sportsmanship, Considering others, Affordable, Family friendly, Fun.  These values resonate in our both, children's and adult beginners programmes.We are affiliated with UK Dek (Ball) hockey association. & International street/ball hockey association. "One of our Aim is to Celebrates multiculturalism by introducing children (boys/girls age 5-14 year) and adults (male/female) to this fast & active sport which is good for fitness and health.Our Children programme costs £16 per-child for the whole term(9weeks)or £3 per-session.  New term starts on the 21st of April 2012 from 09:45am - 10:45am, Saturday mornings. Equipment provided.  Coaching followed by a game. End of term prizes awarded.Our adult beginners programme is for male & female.  It costs £5 per-person and £3 for students and unemployed.  We play every second Monday.  Next session is on Monday the 16th of April 08:30pm-10pm.  From May its going to be 8pm-9:30pm. Equipment provided. Coaching followed by a game.To learn more about our aims, prizes for the children, and how do we ensure safe and fun environment for children and adults.Please contact: Nicky Rae on 07906 638 612 (for children's programme), OREmail: westlondonballhockeyclub@hotmail.co.uk for further details (you can also request e-brochure).Website:  www.londonballhockey.co.uk

waseem nayyer ● 5105d1 Comments ● 5105d

Ealing's Missed collection - Update and Petition

I can update residents on a meeting tonight I had with with Ealing Council's Chief Executive.A number of things were highlighted during the meeting:• Confirmation that in the ward of Southfield (contains parts of Acton and Chiswick) 25 percent of roads have not had their waste collected this week.• Acceptance that their needs to be a change of policy so that streets missed out on a particular day should be treated with a higher priority.• Part of the cause of the problem was that the contractor had too few staff, they were not fully trained with the new collection vehicles and the collection rounds were larger than before.• That the backlog of uncollected waste is reducing borough wide and they hope to have no backlog by the end of this week.• Confirmation that better communication is needed from the Council when communicating with residents who have made complaints about the poor service.As you can imagine I am currently taking all promises from the Council, and their waste contractor, with a large pinch of salt. But tonight Ealing's Chief Executive was open and honest about the issues he is facing and I could see he is active in trying to ensure that the problems are not repeated next week.I have set up an on-line petition to get the Council to hold a review so that this type of poor service cannot happen again. Please sign it yourself and then please pass it on to friends and neighbours. The more signatures the more powerful our statement will be.The link to click is: http://signme.org.uk/727

Gary Malcolm ● 5108d2 Comments ● 5105d

Waste food still not collected in Church Gardens after waiting a full week - truly Beyond Disrespect

So, Councillor Mafouz, all this ostentatious eating of humble pie in public and all your assurances are worthless. No 'Bicycling Bassam' or officers spotted in this neglected backstreet, and endless waits on Council phoneline (boy am I sick of that repetitive dreary whining muzak) despite claims of extra customer 'services' phoneline staffing.The story from Church Gardens, South Ealing:- Black sacks and dry-recycling green boxes were collected on normal day (Tuesday) last week but not the food waste. After waiting a day or two I phoned to report this last Thurdsay and (when I eventually got through) was assured it would be collected from this street by end of next day (Friday) at latest. It wasn't. So, phoned up again today, no explanation as to why the promised 'mop-up' late collection didn't happen - just an assurance that it would be collected by end of tomorrow (Wed). No answer to my query as to how we could be sure that would happen in view of last week's failure, or what we are supposed to do about the accumulated waste if it wasn't.Tomorrow is the due day for refuse and recycling collection here - day later than normal due to bank holiday. I have no confidence whatever that performance will be any better than last week, and am not prapard to risk being lumbered with this container of festering food waste - some of it now a fortnight old - for a further week or more, plus the last few days' further accumulation.So, all that will be going into the black sack tomorrow morning, as will all this household's food waste from now on. The weekly task of dealing with this muck and cleaning out the container after collection (otherwise it stinks) was a messy time-consuming stomach-churning weekly task at the best of times. I see no reason to be lumbered with it if the Council isn't going to bother to collect it or to rectify pronto if it's missed on normal collection day.Well done Ealing Council!!

Chris Veasey ● 5109d1 Comments ● 5108d

Beyond Disrespect

Subject: BEYOND DISRESPECT WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!Abraham asked the Lord to spare 50 righteous people. God responded to Abraham's plea, "If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I  will spare all . . . . Genesis 18:16-33The movie " Corpus  Christi " is due to be released this June to August. This disgusting film set to appear in America later this year depicts  Jesus and his disciples as homosexuals!  As a play, this has already been in theatres for a while.  It's called " Corpus  Christi " which means "The Body of Christ".  It's revolting mockery of our Lord.  But we can make a difference.That's why I am sending this e-mail to you.  If you do send this around,  we just might be able to prevent this film from showing in Australia. Let's stand for what we believe in and stop the mockery of Jesus Christ our Saviour.  Where do we stand as Christians?  At the risk of a bit of inconvenience, I'm forwarding this to all I think would appreciate it, too.  Please help us prevent such offenses against our Lord.  There is no petition to sign, no time  limit, or minimum number of people to send this to.  It will take  you less than 2 minutes!Apparently, some regions in Europe have already banned the film.  All we need is a lot of prayer and a lot of e-mails.I address myself to all muslims and Hindus or believers or non believers .JUST GET THE WORD OUT ....  will God  be able to find at least 50 righteous people who are willing to express their concern and voice their opinion against this act of blasphemy?I AM NOT A PERSON WITH DEEP RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BUT THE TEXT ABOVE CAME TO ME FROM A FRIEND WHO IS UNHAPPY ABOUT SUCH RISREGARD FOR THE FEELINGS OF CHRISTIANS . I AM OUTRAGED. 

Os A Whittle ● 5110d5 Comments ● 5110d

Beyond Disrespect

Subject: BEYOND DISRESPECT WE CAN MAKE A DIFFERENCE!Abraham asked the Lord to spare 50 righteous people. God responded to Abraham's plea, "If I find in Sodom fifty righteous within the city, then I  will spare all . . . . Genesis 18:16-33The movie " Corpus  Christi " is due to be released this June to August. This disgusting film set to appear in America later this year depicts  Jesus and his disciples as homosexuals!  As a play, this has already been in theatres for a while.  It's called " Corpus  Christi " which means "The Body of Christ".  It's revolting mockery of our Lord.  But we can make a difference.That's why I am sending this e-mail to you.  If you do send this around,  we just might be able to prevent this film from showing in Australia. Let's stand for what we believe in and stop the mockery of Jesus Christ our Saviour.  Where do we stand as Christians?  At the risk of a bit of inconvenience, I'm forwarding this to all I think would appreciate it, too.  Please help us prevent such offenses against our Lord.  There is no petition to sign, no time  limit, or minimum number of people to send this to.  It will take  you less than 2 minutes!Apparently, some regions in Europe have already banned the film.  All we need is a lot of prayer and a lot of e-mails.I address myself to all muslims and Hindus or believers or non believers .JUST GET THE WORD OUT ....  will God  be able to find at least 50 righteous people who are willing to express their concern and voice their opinion against this act of blasphemy?I AM NOT A PERSON WITH DEEP RELIGIOUS BELIEFS BUT THE TEXT ABOVE CAME TO ME FROM A FRIEND WHO IS UNHAPPY ABOUT SUCH RISREGARD FOR THE FEELINGS OF CHRISTIANS . I AM OUTRAGED. 

Os A Whittle ● 5110d6 Comments ● 5110d

A Friday funny...

...from a friend in the 'States' (so please excuse the spelling).Jack decided to go skiing with his buddy, Bob. So they loaded up Jack's minivan and headed north. After driving for a few hours, they got caught in a terrible blizzard. They pulled into a nearby farm and asked the attractive lady who answered the door if they could spend the night.'I realize its terrible weather out there and I have this huge house all to myself, but I'm recently widowed,' she explained. 'I'm afraid the neighbors will talk if I let you stay in my house.''Don't worry,' Jack said. 'We'll be happy to sleep in the barn, and if the weather breaks, we'll be gone at first light. 'The lady agreed, and the two men found their way to the barn and settled in for the night. Come morning, the weather had cleared, and they got on their way. They enjoyed a great weekend of skiing.But about nine months later, Jack got an unexpected letter from an attorney. It took him a few minutes to figure it out, but he finally determined that it was from the attorney of that attractive widow he had met on the ski weekend.He dropped in on his friend Bob and asked, 'Bob, do you remember that good-looking widow from the farm we stayed at on our ski holiday up north about 9 months ago?''Yes, I do.' said Bob'Did you, er, happen to get up in the middle of the night, go up to the house and pay her a visit?''Well, um, yes!,' Bob said, a little embarrassed about being found out, 'I have to admit that I did.''And did you happen to give her my name instead of telling her your name?'Bob's face turned beet red and he said, 'Yeah, look, I'm sorry, buddy, I'm afraid I did.' 'Why do you ask?' 'She just died and left me everything.'

Nigel Brooks ● 5128d3 Comments ● 5125d

£5m on Southall Car park

5 million pounds for a car park when jobs are being lost and libraries are threatened with closure makes no sense. Southall is a heavily congested area already and the last thing it needs is more cars. Southall is very well connected through various bus routes which shoppers to the area can use thereby reducing congestion, helping the economy and the environment.If Ealing Council is determined to increase parking spaces surely it makes more sense to use what is available already. Why not increase the number of pay and display parking areas by doubling up on roads where there is residents parking only, as many of these spaces are free during the day while residents are working.But the Council also needs to take into account the rising petrol prices and if they continue to rise, how many people will be able to afford to drive in the future? Thereby making their car park redundant. As a resident of Southall and a tax payer, I strongly disagree with this decision and it is not what I want to see in Southall or how I want my money used.  I would rather see the Rangers who look after our parks and green spaces kept in employment and the businesses in Southall encouraged to keep their areas tidy so that rats are no longer a common sight, people educated about the health hazards of spitting and making the streets of Southall green again.These are the things that would make Southall a much better place in which to live and visit.

Meena Hans ● 5495d37 Comments ● 5145d

Brentford Festival cancelled for 2012

PRESS RELEASE RE THE CANCELLATION OF THE BRENTFORD FESTIVALAfter 7 successive years, the Brentford Festival scheduled for Sunday 2nd September in Boston Manor Park, will not be held there this year.As a result of the contract that the London Borough of Hounslow awarded to John Laing Integrated Services to manage Boston Manor Park and its use for public events, the Festival is being asked to make financial & legal commitments which, as a non-profit community group manned by unpaid volunteers, is just not able to make.Despite approaches to both LBH & Laing to resolve these issues, they have not responded in time for us commit our limited resources to organising & managing this year’s festival in Boston Manor Park.Additionally, we understand that the park’s staff who have volunteered their essential support of the Festival in previous years have recently lost their contract with Laing and so will not be available to us in future.It is possible that the Festival will be transferred to another site in the Brentford/Ealing area but, if so, it is unlikely to be on the same scale as previously and thus not as comprehensive a community event.We hope that the Brentford Festival can return to Boston Manor Park next year and to this end, we invite you to support us in resolving these issues by making your views known to the Council – you can do this by emailing Hamish Pringle, Assistant Director Leisure and Cultural Services (Hamish.pringle@hounslow.gov.uk) and/or your local councillor (see here)Brentford Festival Committeewww.brentfordfestival.org.ukFebruary 2012‘Dave Viney, the festival’s music manager commented “it is appalling that the Council has apparently abdicated any responsibility for free community events in public parks – the Brentford festival was a unique opportunity for local musicians to showcase their talents and entertain local residents in a festival environment – together with their oppressive regulation of live music in pubs & clubs, the Council seem hell-bent on exterminating live music in the borough’ Linda Massey Event Manager says “It is with great sadness that we have had to reach the decision to cancel Brentford Festival 2012.  We felt strongly about the decision for JLIS to charge a fee in 2011 and I mentioned this in my monthly article which appeared in the paper in May.  As unpaid volunteers there has never been an issue of my colleagues and I supporting the local community by providing a high quality event but not when someone else is profiting from it.  LB Hounslow came to the rescue last year and paid this bill but this always felt immoral.  We gave all parties enough time to sort the issue out amongst themselves and the timescale was not unreasonable”.  As a result we leave a lot of people disappointed; if the “powers that be” can rally around and meet our requests made in December then maybe we can consider resurrecting the event in 2013.

dave viney (music manager) ● 5161d17 Comments ● 5155d

Housing Crisis! What crisis?

Is there a housing crisis in Ealing? Yes. What is the evidence? Surely the "beds in sheds" initiative indicates there is a desperate need and free market forces appear able to satisfy that demand. However the "beds in sheds" initiative is certainly better at housing those at the "bottom of the heap" than the government or Ealing Council. Using figures from Ealing's Planning Policy Team's Annual Monitoring Report (extracted by West Ealing Neighbours) of the 265 new homes built in Ealing last year only 73 were "affordable" (a technical term) and of those only 6 yes ONLY 6 were social rented homes. This is of some embarrassment to officers because they used to send this as part of an ebulletin to those of us who were interested. Now they have stopped. Some of Ealing's Regeneration and Planning Team are off to the MIPIM property fair in Cannes to attempt to improve this number of 6. Who knows why they go there and what if anything it achieves. They need look no further than across the Uxbridge Road from their office windows. I think I could fit 24 Park Homes onto the cinema site. Do it now. It would solve two problems. Not only would families be housed but "The Empire would Strike Back" soon enough. The park homes could be towed off to some other miscreant.... Daniel's Department Store site? And what about empty properties. Oh yes (and I never found out why) Ealing paid £1.7million for the YMCA building in Bond Street. Fit it out and rehouse the displaced "beds in sheds" occupants. Empty offices same thing. There is a crisis. Just do it now. For Ealing's officers this is what you do in a crisis not swan off to Cannes on your bikes paid for by goodness knows who to broker goodness knows what. Better to go to Japan and see how they have rehoused people after the tsunami. Here there is a housing crisis. Deal with it.    

Arthur Breens ● 5191d12 Comments ● 5180d

Beware Ealing Dental Care!

Summary: They are in the business of greed rather than welfare of their patients and are refusing to treat registered NHS patients!I am a registered patient at Ealing Dental Care, 122 The Broadway in Ealing.  I made an appointment for a check up 2 weeks ago. I arrived this morning for my appointment.  I was given a form by the receptionist and immediately asked if I was on claiming any benefits.  I told the receptionist that I had Maternity Exemption.  Her behaviour immediately changed and she looked at me coyly. A female dentist standing nearby then walked over and said “We’re having financial difficulties at the moment.  We’re only seeing patients who are will to pay for treatment.”This seems utterly absurd and should be an infringement of NHS rules. I asked why I hadn’t been told when I made the appointment and they said “It’s a recent problem, only since last week”.  I don’t believe this at all and feel this practice is purely in the interest of greed rather than patient welfare.  They made no attempt to apologise for the inconvenience of having to take time off work or having to travel there as a heavily pregnant woman only to be refused a check up.Lastly, what I found most odd was they seemed willing to see me if I had been a “normal” NHS patient without Maternity Exemption.  The NHS pays them for my treatment regardless!!Bottom line: DO NOT USE THIS PRACTICE unless you've got loads of money to burn as a private patient.

Crystal Hirschorn ● 5187d8 Comments ● 5184d

South Ealing Gas Leak Scandal

Cllr Millican posts warn us of yet more gas-leak-related work on the South Ealing Road soon. This is pretty much a sham by Transco who have over the past twenty years failed to cure the root of the problem as anyone who travels, lives, or works on the South Ealing Road between Saint Mary's Church and the Thames knows. The root cause of this is one of the oldest "grid" gas mains in the country a 24inch monster of a "medium pressure" gas main deeply buried and very old and crumbling. It used to connect the old gas works in Brentford to Ealing Broadway via South Ealing. It is falling apart and Transco does not want to replace it because of the projected cost. This is why you will see the same patches of road being dug up time and again and manhole covers lifted to vent the gas. The truth is that the work that is seen to be done is yellow plastic pipes leading to customers and the second shallower cast iron gas main (six to eith inches) and "low pressure" which is nearer the road surface. This is largely cosmetic and is more concerned with venting the ducts belonging to the telecoms phone companies. If enough concrete is poured in on top then the gas get diverted elsewhere.There is one point just south of the bus stop opposite South Ealing tube station where there is occasionally a smell of gas and which gets dug up every couple of years. The problem is this Victorian antique which needs to be replaces.I would expect continued regular disruption for the next few decades on the South Ealing road until the gas main collapses completely.Will.

William J Malmet ● 5199d6 Comments ● 5194d

Think Local Shop Local

We are blessed with some great local shopping areas, buzzing with life, with cafe's, restaurants, independent shops and businesses, libraries, and open spaces: areas such as Northfields Avenue, The Avenue and Pitshanger Lane in Ealing, Churchfield Road in Acton, Leeland Road Farmers Market in west Ealing, Acton Market, Bond Street in central Ealing, South Road and King Street in Southall, the Broadway in Hanwell, Greenford Broadway, to name just a few.However we all know how tough the times there have been recently and, if we are to believe the pundits, it will be a while before things improve.Meanwhile Ealing's Conservative Council has been working hard to support local businesses and traders in every town right across the Borough: Acton, Ealing, Greenford, Hanwell, Northolt, Perivale, Southall and west Ealing.We are spending many millions of pounds to support shops and traders improve their marketing, merchandising and shop fronts; improving the street environment with new pavements, more hanging baskets, removal of clutter; and generally tidying up our towns.  This all helps to make shopping locally a more pleasant experience, as we are all more likely to shop locally if the environment is pleasurable.As part of this support, Ealing Council is suspending all charges for off-street parking for every weekend in January.  This is a huge boost and has been welcomed by the business and traders' associations.To weather this storm every one of our independent traders needs all the support they can get.  Support from us all. Of course there is a need for the big multiples, but very often the local independent traders offer a great service.  So I would like to start a campaign to shop locally and use local services.   I would like to encourage us to think local, spend local. We all have experiences of how local independent shops, traders and businesses have provided magnificent service and great value for money.  Let's share those experiences, through EalingToday, and support our local neighbourhood shops and businesses.Councillor David MillicanRepresenting Northfield WardCabinet Member for Regeneration and TransportMembers Room, Ealing Town Hall

David Millican ● 6298d93 Comments ● 5194d

Theatreland - must they shock with foul language?

Although this topic refers to theatres in the West End I wonder what theatregoers feel about the presence of foul language and innuendo in the theatre nowadays?Recently I went with friends to see 'Rock of Ages' in the Shaftesbury Theatre - the show was rude, lewd but the music was good. Although many in the audience did appear to enjoy the show my friends and I walked out during the interval! This sort of suggestion and innuendo was not what we expected to see and it is a shame because we did enjoy the music.  We were not surprised to find an elderly chap hanging around outside the theatre waiting for members of the audience to leave halfway through so he coule ask for a spare ticket to watch the end of the show! We are definately not prudes but do feel that it was unnecessary to expect the artists to behave in this manner.This evening my friend went to see Billy Elliott at the Victoria Palace Theatre with visitors from Singapore. She had seen this production a few years ago and enjoyed it, but now it seems to have acquired much more swear words and this is spoken in front of young children, both on stage and in the audience. In fact the show starts with a four letter word brin used by the 15 year actor. The guests from Singapore were quite shocked and my friend was embarrassed.She also said it was a similar experience when they went along to see Oliver. What is happening to this country when swear words are more widely accepted and probably expected in the theatre? Some of these productions are popular with children so it is worrying and rather sad that the level of accceptance has been reduced so much that the producers think that they must downgrade standards to appeal to an audience. What do others think? I love the theatre but find this foul language unacceptable and not necessary, especially in shows aimed at children.

Jean F Fernandez ● 5227d19 Comments ● 5215d

Acton Baths Campaign Update

The online petition is continuing and we have over 2300 signatures (previously 1862).We are now asking AS MANY PEOPLE AS POSSIBLE to attend the next Ward Forum Public Meeting, taking place this Wednesday, 23 Nov, 7pm onwards.This is your opportunity to raise questions, discuss the concerns you have about the way the council has been handling matters around the baths closure, and talk directly about this with the Elected Councillors who represent South Acton.Ealing’s Mayor: Cllr John Gallagher, is expected to attend, and possibly representatives of the council’s Regeneration and Leisure teams. Full details: South Acton Ward Forum MeetingCentre for Armenian Information and Advice,105a Mill Hill Road, Acton W3 8JFWed, 23 Nov, 7pm – 9pmWe are ALSO strongly recommending as many people as possible write (or email) the key decision maker/s at the council, and other influential people and groups, to express their opinions about the closure. These include:Councillor Julian Bell, Leader of the Councilc/o Labour Group Members’ RoomEaling Town Hall, New Broadway, London, W5 2BYEmail – Julian.bell@ealing.gov.ukEnglish Heritage1 Waterhouse Square, 138 - 142 Holborn, London, EC1N 2STEmail - london@english-heritage.org.uk or customers@english-heritage.org.ukThe Victorian Society1 Priory Gardens, London, W4 1TTEmail – admin@victoriansociety.org.uk  WE HOPE YOU CAN MAKE THE MEETING ON WEDNESDAY! Thank you and best wishes.Petition:  http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/acton-baths-closure-petition.html   Video: http://www.winkball.com/blogs/lqvh9YmK885m/acton-baths-closure   Facebook:  http://www.facebook.com/pages/Acton-Baths-Closure/232013403518724?sk=wall   Ealing Gazette Letter (20 Oct): http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/2011/10/20/letters-it-s-time-to-fight-to-save-the-pool-64767-29637633/   Ealing Gazette Article (18 Oct): http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/ealing-news/local-ealing-news/2011/10/18/council-handed-petition-against-acton-baths-closure-64767-29616137/

S Bradford ● 5250d2 Comments ● 5239d

Watermans 'Bliss' Evening this Saturday £12 Tickets

Just received an email about their charity event this Saturday evening, sounds really nice and just what one needs before Christmas .. This is a charity fundraising event for children’s charity Tree of Hope. We just want to give you a Wonderful EveningBliss@Watermans                                                Saturday 26 November - doors open 7.15pm7.30pm to 8.00pm - Meaning and Mysteries of LifeA colourful show from James Parker- Magician and Philosophical Illusionist 8.00pm to 8.30pm - Healing AngelsPurify Your Body, Mind, Heart and Soul from Stress and Negativity with the help of Angels - an Angel Healing Session by World Famous Angel Therapist Sabi Hilmi (www.purely-angels.com)8.45pm to 9.30pm - Comedy with Ray CrawfordCome and Kill Your Stress through Laughter (Fair Minded Aussie Bloke Fighting for a Fair Go)Ticket Price £12 (Early Bird Offer £10 if you book before 14 November) Friends discounts do NOT applyShow your tickets to Guru Tandoori Restaurant at the Venue and grab a mouth watering Indian meal for only £5THE TREE OF HOPE CHILDREN’S CHARITY offers ‘HOPE’ to the families of Sick UK Children who need Specialist Medical Surgery, Treatment and Therapy in order to free them from suffering, giving a better Quality to their Young Lives.Registered Charity in England and Wales No. 1043092Registered Charity in Scotland No. SC042611www.treeofhope.org.uk

Ann Ryan ● 5247d0 Comments ● 5247d

Reliable dog walker needed urgently in South Ealing

We urgently need to find a reliable dog walker in the South Ealing area.  This role may appeal to a fit, healthy retiree, someone looking to make a living from dog walking or another dog owner who doesn't work and walks their own dog who might like the company of ours!We are looking (initially) for the walks to be each lunch time, but we would ideally like to find someone who is flexible enough in their arrangements to be able to cover some evening walks, offer day care now and then (week days and weekends - at our home if you prefer) and holiday cover if we want to go abroad.We would like someone who can dedicate themselves to this role permanently without any conflicting part-time jobs or other commitments - we have been let down a lot in the past, which is no good for our stress levels or for the dog's well-being!Our dog is a young, lively, fun and very active medium size dog.  He weighs around 20kg so, you'd need to be pretty fit and strong(ish) to manage walking him.  He is very quick on his feet so, this role would be most suitable for someone who is able to run after him to catch him!  Saying that, his recall is pretty good and treats usually entice him back.  He's fully socialised and therefore, gets on very well with humans and other dogs.  We work full-time and we therefore, need someone we can trust who has a lot of love for dogs, a strong sense of reliability and commitment to the role.  We will require police clearance checks and references together with proof of identity and home address.  In turn, we will be paying a competitive rate (to be agreed in person).If you are interested in this role, please contact Jenny on: 07976 702073 or Toby on: 07973 390772. 

Jenny Wilkes ● 5250d0 Comments ● 5250d

Healthcare in Ealing Scheduled to Get Much Worse

NHS plans released recently will at best significantly reduce Accident and Emergency (A and E) services at Ealing's two hospitals, Ealing and Central Middlesex by 37%. I had to attend Ealing Hospital A and E early evening on Tuesday of last week. I had to wait over 90 minutes and for much of that time had to stand up as there were too fews chairs. However the clinical service, when provided, was of high quality. To be a viable local A and E service more room is needed; more chairs; and more nurses and more doctors.At worst both A and E units will be closed down. There are no plans to build any new hospitals or A and E units in Ealing.Ealing Council's plans are to grow Ealing's population from 310,000 to 350,000 over the next 15 years. The building of new homes alone will introduce some 28,000 new residents into Ealing. In Southall  some 8,000 new residents will occupy 3,750 new homes on the Gas Works site.The NHS logic to support this down grade in local healthcare services includes the argument that more specialists will be available in larger teams. However these teams will be remotely located outside the borough and the patient pool they will have to service will increase significantly in size. Ealing Patients will have to travel much longer distances to access emergency care and those worst affected will be the less able bodied and less prosperous members of Ealing society.Another bit of bizarre logic is that another part of London - North West London healthcare - has run up very large financial debts and healthcare service cuts will have to made in Ealing to save money and help the financial bale out in north west London.

Eric Alan Leach ● 5265d3 Comments ● 5262d

Acton Baths Campaign Update

Dear Friends, council taxpayers and pool & gym users. Did you know the council is planning to close Acton Swimming Baths as early as the 4 December 2011? Since no request for planning permission has yet been submitted to Ealing council, the aim of this campaign, and petition, is simply to persuade the council to keep Acton Baths and gym facilities open until planning permission has been approved. We have had a fantastic response so far, which meant we were able to present a total of 1862 signatures to the Mayor at the recent Ealing Town Hall Council Meeting (18 Oct). We gave a three minute presentation to councilors, which can be viewed at the ‘Video’ link below.As time is now very short, we are urging as many people as possible to write (or email) the key decision makers and influencers at the council, as soon as possible, to express their opinions about the proposed closure. These include: Lucy TaylorAssistant Director Regeneration and Planning PolicyPerceval House 4th Floor,14-16 Uxbridge Road,Ealing,London, W5 2HLEmail - taylorl@ealing.gov.uk Councillor Julian Bellc/o Labour Group Members' Room, Ealing Town Hall, New Broadway, London, W5 2BY Email - julian.bell@ealing.gov.ukWe are also continuing to collect signatures through the paper-based petition and on-line version. If you have not done so already, please forward the link to the on-line Petition (below) to your contacts, and post it on community forums, school groups, mums groups, etc, that you are a member of. If you would like to collect signatures using a paper copy of the petition text and signature form, or would like to contribute to the campaign in other ways, please get in touch by email (click on S Bradford above). Please check the Friends of Acton Baths noticeboard, in the corridor by the entrance to the main pool, for further updates.Thank you and best wishes.Petition: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/acton-baths-closure-petition.htmlVideo:http://www.winkball.com/blogs/lqvh9YmK885m/acton-baths-closureFacebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Acton-Baths-Closure/232013403518724?sk=wallEaling Gazette Letter (20 Oct):http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/2011/10/20/letters-it-s-time-to-fight-to-save-the-pool-64767-29637633/Ealing Gazette Article (18 Oct):http://www.ealinggazette.co.uk/ealing-news/local-ealing-news/2011/10/18/council-handed-petition-against-acton-baths-closure-64767-29616137/

S Bradford ● 5278d0 Comments ● 5278d

Mahfouz is talking rubbish

With this tweet Labour’s Cllr Bassam Mahfouz demonstrates that he does not understand the service that he is in charge of.  Sorry, I couldn't resist the title.  When the council works out participation rates for re-cycling it sends a man or woman with a clipboard down your street.  They tick the number of re-cycling boxes or pink re-usable bags outside the houses in your street.  This number gets divided by the total number of dwellings to calculate a participation rate.  When Mahfouz says only 25% use the service he misunderstands completely.  We use the garden waste service 3 or 4 times a year.  The rest of the year everything goes in the compost bin.  It is only when we have a big day in the garden and the compost bins (we have two big ones) get filled up that we start on the re-cycling bags.  It is unlikely that we would have ever have registered in any survey of participation.  This is the greenest approach.  The bulk gets composted.  Peaks get handled by the re-cycling service.  Re-cycling all garden waste is pretty dumb.  Carting around stuff that can be composted in your back garden and used there is silly.  Labour’s new charge will change my behaviour.  Instead of using the garden waste service 3 or 4 times a year I will simply bag up my excess in black sacks and leave it out for the bin man.  Mahfouz’s changes will break something that works, reduce the recycling rate in the borough and cost money in additional land fill tax.  Labour needs to think again.  Threatening people that the only alternative is fortnightly collection of rubbish is just a form of bullying.  It is worth noting that the council has done well with its new contract for waste, street cleaning and grounds maintenance.  It makes good a rather poor contract made by the previous Labour administration when one of the executives of the contractor was a Labour cabinet member.  As a result the council is due to save £3.5 million from this contract.  The Labour cabinet has decided to snatch another £1.1 million.  They are pressing too hard on this universal service.  They should look elsewhere and stop threatening people.  A positive approach would be to educate people about compost bins and offer a free and easy system for collecting excess.  This would save the council money and maximise the best possible re-cycling - composting your own waste and re-using at home without any transport.  It does involve some heavy spadework every six months or so though! The £40 wheelie bins will ingrain a bad habit of "re-cycling" all garden waste.

Phil Taylor ● 5318d12 Comments ● 5288d

Sex Establishment Performance of nude dance on stage and in a private booth area

EALING LICENSING SUB-COMMITTEE   is to consider this applicationParkbox Ltd LA Confidential1 High StreetEaling W5 5DB New Application                         Sex Establishment Performance of nude dance on stage and in a private booth area Mon-Sat 21:00 - 07:00                 Sun 21:00 - 04:00 16/09/2011 is the date by which objections should be submitted if you do not want  http://www.la-confidential.net/.'Objections 3.23 When considering an application for the grant, renewal or transfer of a licence the appropriate authority should have regard to any observations submitted to it by the chief officer of police and any objections that they have received from anyone else within 28 of the application. Any person can object to an application but the objection should be relevant to the grounds set out in paragraph 12 for refusing a licence. Objections should not be based on moral grounds/values5 and local authorities should not consider objections that are not relevant to the grounds set out in paragraph 12. Objectors must give notice of their objection in writing, stating the general terms of the objection.  3.24 Where the appropriate authority receives notice of any objection the authority shall, before considering the application, give notice in writing of the general terms of the objection to the applicant. However, the appropriate authority shall not without the consent of the person making the objection reveal their name or address to the applicant. Directgov says,From 6 April 2010, local authorities will be able to require prospective lap dancing clubs in their area to apply for a sex establishment licence. They will also be able to require existing venues to get a sex establishment licence.Currently, lap dancing clubs are not treated as sex establishments. This means the only valid objections local people can make to the setting up of a lap dancing club in their area are: • the prevention of crime and disorder • public safety • prevention of public nuisance • protection of children from harmThe change in the law means that from April 6, local people will be able to oppose an application for a lap dancing club on the grounds it does not fit their local neighbourhood.'Ealing now has a reputation for rowdy binge drinking and riots. Do we want to add nude dancing?Objections to,Regulatory Services, Perceval House.Email: licensing@ealing.gov.uk

Graham Weeks ● 5321d2 Comments ● 5320d

Windmill Road W5 Development

Although the planning application has been slid through the back door at Hounslow Council, this will affect Ealing residents.It is for several Hi-Rise apartments for 1000 peopleThis is yet another Croydon like development that is rapidly scarring and damaging the local environs, quality of life and not bringing any residential benefit locally.This development however, will probably affect residents of South Ealing and Old Brentford which of course, lay in two boroughs.Currently there are 2 major developments in process within a third of a mile. One of which is only half completed and has already caused parking and service problems radiating over a third of a mileWhen finished the population will rise artificially by several thousand pushing the local population way beyond the infrastructure to service the local populus.Roads, schools, health services buses and energy & water services are already overstretched with no provision to provide permanent resolutions. In fact, it is largely not possible without penalising the existing residential populationTo top it all, this will result in another huge loss of small industry facilities which has in the last few years forced many businesses to leave the district and reduce significantly opportunities for local employment and rendering it almost impossible for the possibility of small businesses to start and develop.Once again, Greed is the prime mover here and it is a pure myth that this is to help those who need a home in the district. As we all know, those genuine locals will still not be able to afford to move in and like most other developments, 90% will be in the hands of buy to let and multiple landlords.As the application went in on the quiet, objections need to be made by 4th of July toHounslows planning dept>Nikolas.Smith@hounslow.gov.uk Plans can be seen at Brentford Library if it's ever open!

Michael Brandt ● 5402d11 Comments ● 5332d

House Hunt Mission Impossible

SORRY IF THIS MESSAGE APPEARS TWICE - MY LAPTOP CRASHED WHEN I TRIED TO POST IT A MINUTE AGO, SO NOT SURE IF IT SENT.Hello all,Apologies if this is a bit of a random post, and I know my request is somewhat of a long shot....but I thought it was worth a try anyway!Basically, my partner and I are looking to move to Ealing. We've looked around quite a few different areas in the West, but whenever we look elsewhere, we keep finding ourselves liking Ealing more.We're looking for an area to basically "set up home", and hopefully, if we are lucky one day soon, raise a family.With all its greenery, community feel, lovely Victorian/Edwardian houses, and great transport links, Ealing seems the perfect place for us.So, now that the tricky location decision has been made, we now have the seemingly impossible task of finding a home to buy!We know that August is a notoriously slow time for the property market, and most of the local agents seem to be pretty much out of stock and our waiting for instructions.Which brings me FINALLY to my question....I was wondering if there was anyone out there, or if anyone knew of someone who was thinking of putting their family home on the market in September/October time, but would perhaps consider a private sale rather than having to go through an agent and pay their fees?Like I say, I know it's a long shot....but if you don;t ask and all that.The area that we love in particular is between Ealing Broadway and SOuth Ealing tube (Lammas/Walpole Park area).Ok - I'll stop rambling now.Oh, and just to be clear, in case there is any doubt, this is a genuine request - I am not an estate agent trying to bag instructions!Thanks for reading.

Kristina Wilson-Brown ● 5360d8 Comments ● 5358d

Pavlo (Paul) Kulak - Rogue trader

I want to flag a rogue handyman/decorator operating in the Ealing/Hanwel/Perivale area that my fiancé and I have had trouble with recently.His name is Pavlo (Paul) Kulak and his wife (Mariela) often works with him. We had asked him to repair loose tiles around our bath and to replace a tiled cover for our boiler, both jobs relatively simple.The alarms bells started to ring when he completed the job in an unusually short space of time and then charged us a third more than he had originally quoted. The job seemed to have been done sufficiently so we accepted the extra cost and moved on.Two weeks later I noticed that the grouting around the bath tiles was coming off in chunks, and that the tiles actually moved when pressed lightly; now three months on they are all loose and coming away from the wall, and there are clearly signs of water damage underneath . Secondly, when the boiler cover was moved out for the annual service (as it was built to do) all of the tiles fell off the cover in one go! Clearly there is an issue with the type of fixative used on the tiles which was also probably not allowed to dry properly.Needless to say we contacted Paul who then reeled off a list of bad excuses, and claimed that we must have done something to cause the tiles to fall off! After much arguing Paul initially agreed to pay some money back but now has refused after chasing him on the phone for weeks.Sadly we have had to put this down to a bad experience but I want to let as many people know as possible not to use this guy to avoid the same thing happening again.Kirstie

Kirstie Cant ● 5389d2 Comments ● 5386d

Labour Library Defeat Shows that there is an Alternative

Last night the Labour council was comprehensively defeated over the library closure issue by its residents.  As a councillor that has been part of the fight to save Northfields library I thank every resident who signed every petition, sent every email and stood and supported our libraries. Labour last night tried to claim the plaudits for the u-turn but the reality these proposals should never have been brought forward and it now feels like a gross waste of time and money.  It also shows in simple terms that there is an alternative to the cuts mantra that the administration trot out ahead of every proposal to close services.  If you can save the libraries and still make the savings targets what else could be saved rather than cut?  What else could have been saved that has gone?  For me, this decision vindicates those like me who hold the view that the savings targets are in reality a tough but manageable proportion of the councils total expenditure. This is victory for the idea that the council can maintain services and still make it's sums add up.  The gloom and dispondency that currently surrounds the Labour administration should now be replaced with the conviction to protect services.  This will need strong administrative management of the council.  The library u-turn shows that where there is a will there is a way.  No longer will the Labour council be able to claim that there is no alternative to "the cuts". Yours sincerely Cllr Mark Reen

Mark Reen ● 5409d7 Comments ● 5394d

Council cuts 100% of park ranger patrols

I submitted this question about park ranger patrols before the last full council meeting Can the portfolio holder tell us how many patrols were performed by park rangers during 2011-11The answer really surprised me. Not the number of patrols, which they tell us about, but the rest of the information, which I didn't ask for at all. A common complaint that I and others have is that Labour hardly ever answer the questions they are asked. They answer the question they wanted you to ask. See for your self.There were 9347 patrols scheduled to be performed by park rangers over the 12 month period April 2010-March 2011, covering 147 sites. Approx 95% of the patrols were undertaken plus other ad hoc site visits as needed. That's my question answered as far as I am concerned. Here comes the bit that will come as a surprise to everyone who assumed that the patrols that Labour claimed were vital when we were restructuring the service a few years back would continue. There was never any evidence to suggest and/or support the assertion that scheduled proactive patrols were effective in reducing crime and/or vandalism, increasing public perception of safety or improving visitor experience or facilities. The quality {societal impact} measure of patrols are difficult to measure. It's a known fact {as in the case with all public space} that the public perception of safety is improved as a result of providing well maintained parks and open spaces that are welcoming clean and accessible, the councils parks provide the above. Following the parks service restructure in 2011, and since May 2011 parks are not now the subject of scheduled patrols. Park rangers now react to reports from partner organisations, contractors and residents and the aim is now to focus their time and the services resources on for example conservation work, usage monitoring and physical inspections. There has been no reported increase in parks based issues as a result of the restructure and the reduction in the number of park rangers. The service and the council will also benefit substantially from January 2012 as a result of the new environmental services contract which provides for a contractual requirement for the contractor to provide a detailed borough wide reporting regime across all public space, both street based and for parks and open spaces. God, I thought the answer to the question I didn't ask would never stop. What worries me about this is that this is the first i have heard that all patrols have been cancelled and they are sneaking the information out in this way. No consultation, no announcement. They seem also to be suggesting that ranger patrols were worse than useless and that rangers were not only wasting their time wandering around our parks, but they were also waisting council taxpayers money.That's not what they said at the overview and scrutiny public meeting where they heaped praise on rangers and said they were cutting them because of the coalition government cuts. It seems now that they were cutting them because they think they were a waste of council taxpayers money.  If I didn't ask this question, would they have ever told us

Colm Costello ● 5400d7 Comments ● 5399d

Calling All Volunteers! The Orangery, Gunnersbury Park this Saturday 12noon-4pm

ORANGE ROCKCORPS: Gunnersbury Park Project Saturday 25th June 2011, 12 noon – 4pmGunnersbury Park, The Orangery, W5 4NECalling All Volunteers!Gunnersbury Park is a beautiful 75 hectare (186 acres) landscape of exceptional mature trees, open grass spaces and historic buildingsregistered as Grade 2* by English Heritage with 21 separately listed buildings.Orange and RockCorps have come together to help you to give something back to the community. Take part in Orange RockCorps and help transform the Orangery in Gunnersbury Park. Big old buildings don't come better than this!If you are free on Saturday 25th June 2011 between 12 noon - 4pm and would like to help the Orange RockCorps team to renovate the Orangery by painting, washing, scrubbing, varnishing and just generally having a jolly good old time, then all you need to do is register as a volunteer online at:  http://www.orangerockcorps.co.uk/ or call 0800 954 7625. After you give your 4 hours, you'll get given 1 ticket to see some great musical artists.RockCorps is a pro-social production company. RockCorps uses music to inspire people to volunteer and get involved in their community. To date, over 45,000 volunteers have attended more than 20 amazing live music events. This is an opportunity not to be missed out on!!  This park exudes history, beauty and culture and this project will see the transformation of a currently disused building into a beautiful space. We guarantee you won't be disappointed. So come down and join the Orange RockCorps team as we take a step back in time! Note:• Registering online is essential: Only confirmed volunteers get all the details and a reserved place on the project.• You must be at least 16 years of age to participate in an Orange RockCorps project.

Rishi Joshi ● 5404d0 Comments ● 5404d

A selective truth

Crime statistics for Ealing.In Feb 2008 total notifiable offences were 2855. In Jan 2010 they dropped to 2612In Feb 2008 Ealing had the fourth highest notifiable offences out of 33 boroughs. In Jan 2010 Ealing had the sixth highest.So Ealing’s position has improved – albeit slowly. But is that still the case?From Jan 2009 to Jan 2010 there was an increase in total crimes reported in the borough from 32681 to 33129 -. including violent crimes up by 3% (which number far more than any other type of local crime). And yet in London overall, there was a decrease in total crimes reported from 848183 to 827798. In residents surveys Ealing people always say crime is the most important issue, and yet this year 94% said they felt safe. The Ealing people also said they are marginally more satisfied with how Ealing is policed than did the residents in all London. As crime overall in London has dropped but in Ealing it has gone up, then I would say the poll is not worth the paper it is written on. If Ealing people were better informed they should be asking why the Ealing figures have gone up but London’s figures have gone down.If Around Ealing put these figures into context against the overall London figures for the last 12 months, I would be asking why the Tory Council has failed to meet one of its 3 key strategic objectives. Around Ealing has a duty to contextualise statistics rather than allowing this rag to be used as a political mouthpiece. Why? Because in the residents survey, residents said they used this paper more than any other for sourcing Council information. Without contextualisation I would say that some will misinterpret the big picture because of a twisted presentation. That is why I cannot respect this paper.In the Council meeting tonight, the Councillors will see key crime figures shown as dropping. See pages 10 and 11 of the BUDGET STRATEGY AND COUNCIL TAX 2010/11 document. http://www.ealing.gov.uk/ealing3/export/sites/ealingweb/services/council/committees/agendas_minutes_reports/council/19may2009-24may2010/_9_march_2010/item_9_budget_strategy_report.pdfI just hope the authors of the Council paper know what they are doing - because it appears to me that the statistics which they have chosen are the ones which best suit their arguments. The paper certainly fails to mention that Ealing has some of the highest crime rates in all London and omits the latest crimes statistics for Ealing which I have sourced from the Metropolitan Police website.Is that what you call selectivity - or is it fair comment?

George Knox ● 5872d32 Comments ● 5405d

Cllr Julian Bell: Labour choose NOT to protect the most vulnerable

In a piece in the Ealing Gazette which frankly beggars the mind in terms of lack of objectivity and facts Conservative Council Leader Julian Bell presents a view that flies in the face of truth. How can he say these things and how can the Ealing Gazette print them?Bearing in mind the fact that he and his cronies have closed down a) the Albert Dane day centre for the disabled, b) closed down the LINKS project and day centre for the mentally ill, c) downgraded social services provision for the disabled people, d) attempted to halve the taxi card swipe provision for the disabled, and e) are planning to close a number of librares, how on earth can he claim that: "This Labour Council chooses to protect those with both ‘substantive’ and ‘critical’ care needs."He goes on to say: "We are trying to protect front line services and in the latest round of savings targets we have asked the corporate support services to take a bigger percentage hit (8.3% pa) than the childrens and adults services (3.5% pa) to the most vulnerable." which is a pretty amazing piece of cod accounting considering that not one of the top 89 earning staff employed as officers of Ealing Council feature in the 8.3% cut in corporate services.Does he think that we are honestly that stupid, especially as he plans to blow £5 million pounds on a car park in Southall.Looks to me that the need for a new Editor for the Ealing Gazette has moved from important to very urgent!

Marc Races ● 5418d7 Comments ● 5418d

Anyone had problems with British Gas???

We have their HomeCare 400 cover (you know the one which they advertise as giving 'peace of mind')???Their 'blog' said for Plumbing & Drainage Care 'Parts & Labour included' (Up to £1000 for drains). They called 4 times regarding an Interceptor Cap (which is in the inspection manhole just inside our property).The first 3 callers just pushed the Ingterceptor Cap back in place but the last person quoted £75 to fix a new one.We rang British Gas, the first person said she doesn't think we have to pay, I was transferred to another department who had no idea, and finally through to Dyno-Rod who said we would have to pay.In the meantime the fitter asked my husband to sign a form giving details of our Insurers, which he reluctantly did. He aslo asked whether anyone had put a camera down into the drain, we said no. He then did this procedure and said he found defects and encrustation in the underground pipes. This was going under the pavement outside our house. The fitter said he fitted a new Interceptor Cap and that we would receive some correspondence regarding his visit.Sure enough we did - a whopping great estimate of £1,304.40 for carryng out the investigation, fitting the new Interceptor Cap and includng costs for remedial work!We are pensioners and can you imagine the shock we had at receiving this letter?  I have written to complain to British Gas. We pay these people over £400 per year and were under the impression that this covered us - and as they say - for 'peace of mind' and as far as I am concerned this is one of the worst companies on the planet!They mentioned that the drain runs are 'non-shared' which is more or less what we thought (apart from the neighbours sink which is shared) but yesterday my neighbour said that actually his sewage drains for a large family actually go under our front garden and run into the same drain! We had absolutely no idea!Please has anyone come across this situation before? Any advice would be most welcome. I am certainly going to challenge this to the bitter end and I will then cancel British Gas because they have caused us nothing but trouble for years.Thankfully we no longer use them for our Gas & Electricity supply!

Jean F Fernandez ● 5433d4 Comments ● 5433d

Find out about fostering -  at Acton market - Fri 20 May

Ealing Council will be at Acton market, tomorrow Friday 20 May, from approx 10am,   appealing to residents to help change the life of a local child and consider fostering. Ealing has approximately 400 looked-after children and young people and there continues to be a great demand for people who can provide caring homes for the borough’s most vulnerable residents.  The council needs carers from all communities, but has a particular shortage of people who are from a White UK background. They would also like to hear from those who can foster children with disabilities or special needs or provide them with short breaks. There is also a  need for carers from all backgrounds who can look after older children, sibling groups and young mothers with babies. Carers receive dedicated support from the council including mentoring, access to a wide range of training including NVQ qualifications and generous allowance to help meet the needs of those in their care.  If you cant get to Acton market and want to find out more - there will be a chance to chat informally with Council staff and meet some Ealing foster carers at a special drop-in session at Northolt Leisure Centre on Wednesday 25 May from 3-6pm.The council also holds monthly information sessions for people who want to find out more about fostering and adoption. The next one will be held at Ealing Town Hall on Monday 6 June from 7.30- 9.30pm. Further information is available at www.ealing.gov.uk/fosteringadoption or by calling 0800 731 6550.

alison blake ● 5436d0 Comments ● 5436d

Thames water turn on the elderly

You could not make this up!Thames water have threatened legal action on Ealing council having sent snitches to see if allotment holders are using hosepipes to water vegetable and fruit plants.Allotment holders have observed a ban on hosepipe use per say for a very long period but this time Thames Water have got nasty.They are aiming at the elderly and less able members of society.This is a major part of later life for a great many and older folk make up the backbone of many allotment sites.Those who have a long walk from water supplies have their own water reserves replenished by a long hose saving 30 or 40 time consuming returns to the main supply.It is a fair and simple task and allows plot holders to carry own doing what they love.Needless to say they cannot prove whether the hoses are connected to a main supply or a plot holders rainwater tank (which is common)Water Companies seem to think this will save water! They must be either plain stupid, naive or riddled with 30 something lawyers and smarties who think food only comes from Waitrose.Of course, tired old bones carting dozens of buckets of water will no doubt cause spillages a plenty.This is an ageist and dicriminatory policy against the older and less able members of our "Big' Society and Ealing Council along with others should be ashamed in not standing up to the bullying and deceptive methods of Thames water and others.Thin end of the wedge, what next restrict shopping and travel hours for old people?

Oliver Gregan ● 5466d29 Comments ● 5457d

Rogue Trader: PC Renovations, building and gardening services

A warning to Ealing and West London residents!There is a trader operating under the name of PC Renovations; they are offering gardening and building services in the Ealing area, and claim to be from Richmond, although seem to be difficult to track down. I believe they may mainly be operating door-to-door.My elderly neighbour in W13 has been ripped off for several thousand pounds for shoddy work which wouldn't even have been worth much if it was done properly.When asked to remove a small tree, trim back shrubs and clear and demolish a small shed in my neighbours small garden, they ended up building a massive bonfire, and then proceeded to burn the entire shed, the tree, and most of the rubbish in the shed, including plastics, garden chemicals, tools, rags etc., causing masses of black smoke, and flames 4 metres high which threatened other trees.When I approached the main guy, he was very aggressive, and asserted that they had the right to do what they were doing 'as tree surgeons', and that the wood from both the tree and the shed was 'diseased, full of woodlice' and therefore couldn't be disposed of in any other way. As far as I can find, they are not registered tree surgeons, nor would this impart any special rights. Nor was all the wood 'diseased', and it would certainly have been taken down at the local Reuse-and-recycling centre, albeit at a price of course. There is no excuse for burning plastic and other waste, it is illegal. They left the fire only partially doused, leaving my neighbour, my wife, and myself to fully extinguish it later that night. The garden was left in a mess, and the adjoining neighbours garden used without permission as a temporary dumping ground.I have subsequently found out that not only did he charge her over £600 pounds for the garden 'clearance', but unbelievably, she paid out over £3000 pounds in total for other bits of minor work including clearing gutters, and installing some kind of material to stop the gutters being blocked (which was unnecessary and is already falling out), and applying some sealant to a small porch roof. They managed to con my neighbour out of this money with various sob stories; firstly the guys' daughter was ill, then he was getting divorced, then he'd committed suicide: all very tragic sounding but almost certainly untrue; each episode was coupled with a demand for more money. So obvious was the fraud that her bank even questioned the amounts going out of her account.My neighbour is very upset about the episode, and has reported the matter to the police. We've subsequently found out that other neighbours on our street have also been conned into letting these fraudsters do unnecessary work, including one who's front-garden tree was trimmed without his permission, and was then asked to pay for it.The firm drive a scruffy white flat-backed truck with an enlarged cab on-top of which are orange flashing lights, and 'search' lights; a sign on the side of the cab says "P.C. Renovations (Est 2000) ... Freephone number 0800 8589008". The main operator is about 55, white, obese, about 6' tall, with thinning dark brown hair, a ruddy complexion and a London accent, he's not a nice man. He is assisted by a tall thin, bespectacled ginger-haired youth, 20-25, and two other operatives, both white, one of whom has an Irish accent, and may be the individual who demanded money on the phone.Please avoid these traders; if you have further information on them, or their where-abouts, please email ellisnukinetics.com, and I'll pass the information on to the police.

Ellis Pritchard ● 5478d0 Comments ● 5478d

Earn a complimentary ticket to Brentford v Swindon

Help out in the local community and receive a COMPLIMENTARY ticket to watch Brentford Vs Swindon Town on Saturday 9th AprilFootball Clear-Up has once again teamed up with Brentford FC Community Sports Trust to give Brentford FC fans the chance to take part in their second ‘Football Clear-Up’ event.The community based event offers football fans the opportunity to represent their club in the local community by volunteering for two hours on the morning of the match.  As a reward for their hard work, the volunteers will receive a complimentary ticket for them and a Junior Bee to the afternoons’ match against Swindon, where hopefully The Bees will be parading the JPT Trophy.To take part in Football Clear-Up and earn a free ticket, fans eighteen years and over, need to register at www.footballclearup.com.The ‘Clear-Up’ will be taking place at Riverside Lands, Chiswick. The event will see participants clearing debris and generally tidying up the area around the Chiswick Rugby Clubs Clubhouse in preparation for the all new 567’s Youth Football Tournament. The tournament is open to U7 to U14s and is being designed and delivered in partnership with Chiswick Community School, Old Meadonians FC and Lovell Partnerships LtdBrentford FC Manager Nicky Forster said, "The Football Club is delighted with this scheme, which reinforces our reputation in the community as a family club. Those taking part in Football Clear-Up will be rewarded for their hard work and commitment to the community, and I hope that the boys will put in a performance to make them proud”Andrew Bell, Managing Director of Football Clear-Up said, “We are pleased to be holding a second Football Clear-Up event with Brentford FC Community Sports Trust. We held a fantastic event last year where we helped to ‘Clear-Up’ the boating arches under Kew Bridge. We are offering fans an alternative way of watching live football which for a family can be expensive”BFCCST Chief Executive Lee Doyle said, "The Football Clear-Up ethos is about being fan inclusive, irrespective of age, gender or social background. The Trust has always maintained its commitment to promoting inclusion and accessibility to the club. Football Clear-Up offers fans and families a fantastic and rewarding opportunity to show their support for both the Bees and their community”

Andrew Bell ● 5486d0 Comments ● 5486d

How to Write a Rant

How to write a rant.I think we all agree that there is nothing like a good rant. It is therefore pleasing to see that this forum is home to some of the best rants. There are many examples of quality ranting threads – long series of postings, lots of mindless statements, lots of aggression and even some colourful insults. But to date these have been the domain of a select few. Is it not time we widened the pool of people involved and have all of us start and contribute to rants? I wondered if a lack of knowledge and confidence on how to rant was acting as a deterrent. So I thought I’d help.A side note to the noteworthy expert ranters on the forum. This thread is not really for you. Please do not feel insulted by the advise offered here. I am sure you will see the guidance given as 'ranting 101' and view yourself as skilled in all the techniques noted. Just be patient while we get everyone else up to speed.I’ve studied the forum postings over this last few months and I think I may have worked out the optimal formulation for setting up and maintaining a rant. The below has been distilled from a number of rants seen in local forums over the last year – although I must say that the Ealing forum is currently leading the way. We are all very proud.There seems to be only a few simple rules to follow and your contribution to the forum will be a proper rant. It is possible to apply these from any perspective, i.e. left-wing, right-wing, liberal, religious, anti-religious, globalisationist, isolationist, animal rights, human rights, etc. I suggest we all adopt this approach in our contributions to the forum as such ranting must surely be cathartic and a great way to allow pent up emotions vent. The aim of a good rant is two-fold. One it is to incite and stimulate a response. This is important but only a means to an end. The second goal, and the real objective, is to establish the very longest thread of posts. From my observations the aim of a rant is not to present a logical, structured or coherent argument. I am pleased to present these as a series of posts on this thread. Of course if this post or any of its subsequent follow-up posts stimulate a response then we have an interesting dilemma. Do I respond and create a rant – or ignore them and rise above the ranting? Probably the latter. I am here as a guide, not a contributor.Next – setting out the initial statement so that it triggers a long rant.

Alan Clark ● 6340d232 Comments ● 5492d

Terracotta Deli and Cafe Disappointment

I have been meaning to try it since it opened and this morning I did. How was it? Disappointing. The manager/owner spoke aggressively and sarcastically to his staff, who in turn didn't seem to know what they were doing, or if they did, were so afraid of their boss it hindered their ability to work with confidence. I think there were three serving staff, in addition to the owner/manager, which seemed too many. I wanted to give my order at the counter and then find a place to sit, but a waiter told me to sit and then brought over a menu. Unnecessary and time-consuming. The system in Munson's works better: walk in, decide what you want, order, then wait for the order to arrive.I ordered a latte. It came with chocolate sprinkled on top. When I asked why, the waitress said, in an ignorantly pleasant manner, that this was how latte is made. Also, it was cold. I'm not one of these people who want their milk to be scolding, it ruins the flavour of the coffee when made this way, but this coffee was just about tepid. The waitress replaced it immediately. The coffee flavour was average.I was charged £2.50 for the coffee. I thought the price was £1.80 (maybe the sit- down price was more, but this wasn't stated). I was hoping the owner/manager would ask me how the experience was so I could give him some feedback. After all, I want our independent establishments to succeed, but he didn't even thank me for my custom or say goodbye.Terracotta is a good-looking deli and coffee shop but the service, quality of coffee and the attitude of the owner/manager to his staff  means I won't be returning. Perhaps if the owner/manager had spent his energy of training his staff to the standards he and the customer expects he wouldn't have to chastise them when they made mistakes.Can anyone recommend a coffee shop in Northfields where one can guarantee a very good cup of coffee in nice surroundings?

Darren Halford ● 6470d25 Comments ● 5496d

Is this a waste of money ???

Coming to every household on March 27 - a National Census, some 32 pages long, there will be no fewer than 918 boxes for you to tick in answer to questions! It will ask not only your age and job title, but also what type of central heating you use, when you last worked and who has been staying in your house.It will demand you tell the authorities whether you travel to work by motorcycle, scooter, moped or some other mode of transport. It will ask you deeply personal questions about your sexual orientation and emotional preferences. It will ask you when you last worked.It will ask about your ethincity: if you are white, you will be able to tick a box saying you are Engliish/Welsh/Scottish/Northern Irish, British or, alternatively, one of three separate boxes for Irish, Gypsy or Irish traveller and any other type of white background. The tick box system for black, Asicn ans mixed race groups is equally ridiculous. And then there are such vacuous questions as: how is your general health?The Cabinet minister responsible for the census is Francis Maude, and he has behaved with complete feebleness about the whole matter. He more or less admits that the census is quite unnecessary in the computer age. He says that too much money has been spent on this BEFORE the Government came into office and to cancel would run up excessive expenditure! So we are having a census that the Government tacitly admits is a waste of money and time!Failure to complete this form will result in a £1,000 fine!How can we spend £500m on this useless and intrusive census? It is astonishing that we are spending £500m money on this sort of thing. Already all our information is on one computer or another, and that is a worry enough in itself. So many incidents of personal data which has been left on public transport. Now in today's paper it seems that there is census security fears over US firm whose staff stole Obama's student records! They will be responsible for all the information collected!Should we be concerned?

Jean F Fernandez ● 5517d15 Comments ● 5505d

£500+ SPENDING. Council from the top down mired in waste

Council spending detail over £500 is on webpage. http://www2.ealing.gov.uk/services/business/procurement/500/As the Chief Executive seems to be in the frame at the moment, and someone presumably has brought that to his attention, I had a look at the expenditure in Quarter two 2010. In that period the Excel sheet of invoices tells us that the total expenditure against his department was £299,294.83.Out of that total on Stationery Consumables and Printing his department spent £184,664.48.Obviously I cannot say if that was a lot or a little but what I can and do ask is why on earth does his department need to use 30 different contractors to provide this service for his department.Using 30 contractors for apparently just one department when the country is broke, is just shameful. When looking at the total expenditure for all departments for Stationery Consumables and Printing for this quarter the cost was £382,066.77, but this time there was a monstrous number of 75 different suppliers. Do 3,373 Council employees really need so many suppliers?Have they not heard of bulk buying discounts? Have they not heard of the economy of scale in dealing with just a small handful of contractors? And under the heading of sharing suppliers with other West London Alliance Councils has the Chief Executive considered the further discounts which would then also be available? Once we see his department starting to lead by example, then at the same time some of the massive invoices paid by some other departments need to be looked at to see where else bulk buying would reduce the annual Council spending.I think Minister Pickles would be interested in this example of poor management. Over to you Councillor Taylor.

George Knox ● 5530d13 Comments ● 5509d

To Councillor Phil Taylor: re South Ealing Road 'Improvements'

Councillor Taylor, you told us: "It is worth remembering that this scheme is funded by TfL so if we strip out all of the road safety aspects they will not fund it.  But, if we don’t want it we don’t have to have it". I have put this to the Council's Assistant Director of Strategic Transport, Nick O'Donnell, who is responsible for this scheme, and he advises: "To clarify on Councillor Taylor's comments, it is up to the Borough how we spend our allocation of money.  If we wish a corridor to include road safety measures or not has no bearing on the funding.  I trust this clarifies that point".So one of you is talking rubbish and misinforming us. Which one is it? - you or him? - does this scheme really depend on yet-to-be-secured funding from TfL, dependent on demonstrable accident and casualty eduction justification, as you forcefully claim, or has all the funding necessary already been secured and allocated, as Mr O'Donnell equally forcefully claims?Whichver, you can take it from me that this scheme as currently proposed has NO meaningful correlation with the actual accident record on thus corridor - which is remarkably good - having analysed in detail the three years' injury accident records on which the Council claims the scheme to be based, and checked the results against the actual scheme proposed, and there is NO accident-based justification for any of the works proposed.

Chris Veasey ● 5513d5 Comments ● 5509d

Mammas and Pappas buggy for FREE

Hi, I have a mammas and Pappas pliko prammette to sell. You can use it either as a carry cot (where the baby lies flat) or a buggy. It has been WELL used so is by no means in perfect condition. Needs a bit of TLC. The handle bars do still adjust but one is a slightly different height due to carrying a trike across the handle bars! I'm being completely honest with the condition so as not to disillusion you! It is a lovely pram to use with baby but is heavy to push with a toddler  - hence why I'm swapping to a Maclaren. It comes with a rain cover, a foot apron, parasol, instructions and matching nappy bag. It is grey.  Please get in touch if you are interested, I live in Acton. Best wishesNatasha Below is some more information if you're interested; It looks like the pictures below (hope they come through) BUT is not as new or the same model, colour etc. This is the information given on the Mammas and Pappas website for the pliko prammette;Transforms from a pram into a pushchair without adding or taking anything away, making life easier for you as a parent and making every moment with your baby one to enjoy.Key Features:- Suitable from birth- Adjustable leg rest- Face to face in pramette mode- Forward facing pushchair mode- Toddler ride on step- Travel system compatible- Traditional pram mode- Height adjustable handles- One hand fold- Free standing when folded- Compact fold- Individual wheel suspension- Cup holder- Weight 9kg

N Scott ● 5514d0 Comments ● 5514d

WEN Public Meeting - Keep Calm and Carry On! - 2nd March

WEN public meeting - Keep Calm and Carry On - Wednesday 2nd March at St James Church (back of Sainsbury's) from 7.30pm  Keep Calm and Carry On is the theme of this years AGM which we're holding at St James Church, St James Avenue on Wednesday 2nd March starting 7.30pm.As the budget cuts bite, jobs are lost and everyone feels the pressure on their finances we have asked a range of local groups to come and talk for 5 minutes about their activities with the aim of helping, intriguing and inspiring us to get through the tough times ahead.So far we have signed up to speak:Ealing Freecycle - where you can give and get all manner of recycled goods from washing machines and bricks to toys and baby clothesEaling Transition - a group focused on the effects on our lives of climate change and peak oil. They have set up a community garden in Acton, give advice on growing to new allotment holders and much moreWinter Night Shelter project - a new project set up by local churches, including St James, to help homeless people over the winterEaling Cycling Campaign - help and advice on getting cyclingCultivate London - a brand new initiative from our local charity, Ealing and Brentford Consolidated Charity, which aims to take on derelict land and convert it into high yield herb farms to generate jobs and training in practical horticulture for disadvantaged young people. They are looking for volunteer mentors to work for a minimum of two hours a month to share gardening knowledge and work experience. Ealing LETS - the Local Exchange Trading Scheme - a way for people to exchange their time and skills using a local currency and help create an 'alternative' local economy based on need.

Diane Gill ● 5522d3 Comments ● 5515d

South Ealing Explosion 20/02/11

I am a resident in the terraced houses just behind Carlyle House where the gas explosion happened on Sunday 20th February.I want to note my frustration today at the preoccupation of all the emergency services reports and news stories etc. of this blast being based around the front of the building (which was actually the back of the flat involved) and the road in front of this and not the residential homes directly behind, so have joined this forum in order to vent it. There seems to be a total failure to mention the residential homes behind the Carlyle House flats, which are directly in front of the entrance to the flat and which actually bore the brunt of the explosion damage in the end. The closest house to the flat had windows blown in and we all have damaged roof tiles and holes that it seems we probably have to face will require being repaired ourselves in the all too likely event that the man involved is proved to be the cause and has no insurance of his own. The road and park have all been cleared of debris now of course, while our our roofs and gardens still have it strewn all over them.I am obviously immensely relieved that nobody got hurt, which does indeed seem amazing and yesterday, the idea of how much worse it could have been i.e If the building had collapsed on other residents, if children had been in the playground or garden, if I had carried out my plan to do some gardening that morning, if the debris that smashed my roof tiles had landed a few cm's further over and smashed through the glass skylight onto my housemate's head as he readied himself for work below it etc. This was all that was really on my mind in the hours after the incident, but today, in the cold light of a new day I have looked closer at my damaged roof and the garden full of concrete roofing  chunks, large pieces of roof tile, roofing felt plus sharp wooden shards and have wondered how I will get this fixed and cleaned up & who will in the end pay?This morning I was completely fobbed off by Ealing Homes operatives (who own and manage the block) and specifically their repairs Manager Mr. Bra who has his own structural engineers out today to inspect the block but appeared to have little or no respect to or for the surrounding houses affected and was unsympathetic, uncooperative and generally thoroughly unhelpful. Ealing Homes have point blank refused to release the basic information I require for my insurance company: the number of the flat involved, the name of the resident, the gas company involved and the name of a contact at Ealing Homes that might be used for contact by my insurance company. Yet in the event that he has no valid home insurance, I will have to pay for my repairs, which require immediate attention before any rain shower's rear their head, so need to know whether to claim via Insurance regardless or to instruct local repairers to make it watertight or fix entirely at my own very overpriced cost.My own insurance will send an assessor round of course but when it comes to requesting a structural engineer ...or somenone knowledgable to check this row of houses hasn't been structurally damaged from the blast itself, it is very clear that should this gentleman have done this on purpose, we will have little/no right to claim our repair costs back and even though many reports, including that of the gentleman from Murray Road, quoted in the Ealing Gazette report saying that there was just a dull thud, rather than a bang.I can tell you instead that from being less than 25 metres away within my home what I heard and felt that morning was no DULL thud. It was more of a loud BOOM, followed by tremors, then a pounding of matter raining from the skies onto our roofs, gardens & cars causing damage and making holes in their wake.I now have a garden full of large bits of debris and since I am left high and dry with my insurance and will have to either pay for its removal and damages myself or claim against my own home insurance and pay for it effectively next year with a higher premium.I also had no visit from any emergency services to inform me if gas was now safe, or to inspect our damage ...nothing. It surprises me I guess and I just wonder if its something anyone else has come across or if there is any legal or general advice anyone out there can give me, since at present I really cannot afford to throw hundreds of pounds on repairing the damage when someone decides to blow their home sky high! .. the crazy part being in this story is that if the blast debris had damaged my car, the insurance would surely cover the damage without requiring a third party insurance and without affecting my no claims but for the home repair requests, it seems to be the home owner who always suffers most in the end.Thanks for listening,Miss B of Carlyle Road Ealing

Lauren Bonner ● 5523d6 Comments ● 5518d

South Ealing Explosion 20/02/11

I am a resident in the terraced houses just behind Carlyle House where the gas explosion happened on Sunday 20th February.I want to note my frustration today at the preoccupation of all the emergency services reports and news stories etc. of this blast being based around the front of the building (which was actually the back of the flat involved) and the road in front of this and not the residential homes directly behind, so have joined this forum in order to vent it. There seems to be a total failure to mention the residential homes behind the Carlyle House flats, which are directly in front of the entrance to the flat and which actually bore the brunt of the explosion damage in the end. The closest house to the flat had windows blown in and we all have damaged roof tiles and holes that it seems we probably have to face will require being repaired ourselves in the all too likely event that the man involved is proved to be the cause and has no insurance of his own. The road and park have all been cleared of debris now of course, while our our roofs and gardens still have it strewn all over them.I am obviously immensely relieved that nobody got hurt, which does indeed seem amazing and yesterday, the idea of how much worse it could have been i.e If the building had collapsed on other residents, if children had been in the playground or garden, if I had carried out my plan to do some gardening that morning, if the debris that smashed my roof tiles had landed a few cm's further over and smashed through the glass skylight onto my housemate's head as he readied himself for work below it etc. This was all that was really on my mind in the hours after the incident, but today, in the cold light of a new day I have looked closer at my damaged roof and the garden full of concrete roofing  chunks, large pieces of roof tile, roofing felt plus sharp wooden shards and have wondered how I will get this fixed and cleaned up & who will in the end pay?This morning I was completely fobbed off by Ealing Homes operatives (who own and manage the block) and specifically their repairs Manager Mr. Bra who has his own structural engineers out today to inspect the block but appeared to have little or no respect to or for the surrounding houses affected and was unsympathetic, uncooperative and generally thoroughly unhelpful. Ealing Homes have point blank refused to release the basic information I require for my insurance company: the number of the flat involved, the name of the resident, the gas company involved and the name of a contact at Ealing Homes that might be used for contact by my insurance company. Yet in the event that he has no valid home insurance, I will have to pay for my repairs, which require immediate attention before any rain shower's rear their head, so need to know whether to claim via Insurance regardless or to instruct local repairers to make it watertight or fix entirely at my own very overpriced cost.My own insurance will send an assessor round of course but when it comes to requesting a structural engineer ...or somenone knowledgable to check this row of houses hasn't been structurally damaged from the blast itself, it is very clear that should this gentleman have done this on purpose, we will have little/no right to claim our repair costs back and even though many reports, including that of the gentleman from Murray Road, quoted in the Ealing Gazette report saying that there was just a dull thud, rather than a bang.I can tell you instead that from being less than 25 metres away within my home what I heard and felt that morning was no DULL thud. It was more of a loud BOOM, followed by tremors, then a pounding of matter raining from the skies onto our roofs, gardens & cars causing damage and making holes in their wake.I now have a garden full of large bits of debris and since I am left high and dry with my insurance and will have to either pay for its removal and damages myself or claim against my own home insurance and pay for it effectively next year with a higher premium.I also had no visit from any emergency services to inform me if gas was now safe, or to inspect our damage ...nothing. It surprises me I guess and I just wonder if its something anyone else has come across or if there is any legal or general advice anyone out there can give me, since at present I really cannot afford to throw hundreds of pounds on repairing the damage when someone decides to blow their home sky high! ...the crazy part being in this story is that if the blast debris had damaged my car, the insurance would surely cover the damage without requiring a third party insurance and without affecting my no claims but for the home repair requests, it seems to be the home owner who always suffers most in the end.Thanks for listening,Miss B of Carlyle Road Ealing

Lauren Bonner ● 5523d0 Comments ● 5523d

Senior Council staff salaries – a question  for Cllr Taylor

Dear EditorThanks for telling us about the new info concerning Council Spending on Ealing’s website.The presentation of the expenditure items over £500 need a Wikileaks type mind to analyse the data which seems just thrown into an Excel file. But what would you expect from an organisation that is troubled by standards which struggle with going the extra mile?I have not had time to look but Arthur will be not disappointed when he sees confirmation that there are large hunks of money spent by Regeneration by unelected Council Officers..However I did look at the list of Employees earning over £50,000 per year.http://www.ealingtoday.co.uk/default.asp?section=info&link=http://nnet-server.com/server/common/conealingspendingpublish001.htmNow COUNCILLOR TAYLOR you come right into the FIRING LINE for this along with JS, the Tory whip and others.How is it that there was such a large increase in numbers of senior staff who came into the over £50K per annum bracket in the last year before the last local election? Combined with what many call an election bribe, the changed picture is not good on first glance.Secondly you (rightly) bang on about the introduction of various staff efficiencies. But your lot created a situation which makes today’s salary bill even more expensive and presumably hard to deal with and more expensive as regards redundancy costs. Unless I am much mistaken these people are on a bonus scheme which is also much more generous than for the junior staff.How many of these staff in the over £50K level were existing and how many were brought in new? Do we need them all? Knowing that everyone in the country before the election wanted front line staff protected, what kind of wisdom was it that resulted in a substantial increase of back office staff? How many front line staff will go because of this folly which the effete Labour administration now have to deal with? This wisdom was even more suspect, because the Labour party have a very long tradition both locally and nationally of mismanaging our finances and you knew the stakes were high as regards winning Ealing again because the tram issue was history.You then (rightly) complain about staff going in House (the Housing maintenance people) and you remain silent about the May Gurney staff possibly coming in house.With a legacy like that,how can anyone know where we stand with the Tories these days? All very well complaining about Brown spending more than we could afford, but it looks as though the local Tories were tarred with the same brush. What do the junior staff think? Are we to be surprised about forthcoming marches next month and onwards?To coin your expression we should be told.

George Knox ● 5543d22 Comments ● 5527d

Shame on you, Council Leader Julian Bell

The only thing that I can think of as a response to your apology in the Ealing Gazette for the cuts is: "Shame on you"!The cuts in Ealing are being handled in a shameful way with no concept of fairness or proportionality in the way they are being implemented. Cavalier and partisan are the least impolite words that I can think of for the actions of a self-processed committed Christian who cuts Ealing's disabled centres and mental health support centres deeming them "not fit for purpose" and services while:a)Proceeding to spend £500,000 on a skateboard park.b) Continuing to plan to spend £500,000 on a dance studio in Ealing Town Hall.c) Proceeding to spend £5 million on restoring victorian folly structures in Gunnersbury Park.d) Planning and proceeding to spend tens of millions of pounds in building new facilities in two locations in Ealing for new council offices.e) Trying to cut the Taxi Cab scheme.Shame on you, sir. How much does it cost to build a couple of new day centres that we badly need that are "fit for purpose", not the £25 to £26 million that you are planning in the above actions. Are there other such hidden projects that we do not know about.How can you as a committed caring Christian axe these essential day centres and other services for the mentally ill and the disabled?I also ask why the cuts in Ealing Council are not proportionate all the way up to the top of the council? Of the top six executives there has not even been dicussion of removing one of these posts (that would easily pay for the staffing of a day centre with the disproportionate rates that care workers are paid compared with Ealing Council's top directors. For that matter, why have there been no cuts in the top thirty posts (by pay) in the Council? Is this fair?

Luther Brown ● 5546d2 Comments ● 5546d

Bulk Buying Scheme - Low Carbon Zone

Are you interested in reducing your fuel bills? Why not join a Bulk buying scheme to purchase solar panels at a discount and receive feed in tariff income tax free.At Ealing Green Drinks this week we listened to an excellent presentation by one of the founders of the Muswell Hill Sustainability Group who, with the help of the Local Council, set up the low carbon zone and a bulk buying scheme to assist residents to convert to renewable energy and reduce their carbon foot print. Many people turned up this week to listen and join in including the Ealing Cabinet member for the environment and transport. If you are interested in similar projects or can assist in any way why not get in touch with Ealing Transition or see their website details below, or let me know, you can also see the power point presentations at http://uk.groups.yahoo.com/group/ealinggreendrinks/ under "Folders". Ealing Transition Renewable EnergyAt the end of last year we ran a mini-conference on renewable energy. We are now in the process of exploring options for a community-based scheme. This might take the form of a buying group capable of negotiating discounts on the price of solar panels and electricity supply, or taking stakes in a larger generating facility. We will be organizing an event along these lines later this year. In the meantime, we’d love to hear from you if:You are already exploring renewable power for your home You’d like to invest in renewable power but do not have a suitable roof space You own or have access to a large public building with a south-facing roof You have experience in this area, or are interested in helping us to run the community scheme Do drop us a line at the usual address steering@ealingtransition.org.uk.

Conrad Bryan ● 5546d0 Comments ● 5546d

Mobile Phone advice please

I wonder whether anyone else has had this problem.I have a second mobile phone on Orange PAYG and because I did not use this phone for a few months and then suddenly discovered I was unable to make calls at all.I called in the Orange store where I was advised that I have now 'lost' my mobile number (which I had for years) and would now have to purchase another sim card for £5 which I reluctantly did.When I asked what happened to the small amount of credit I had on this phone, around £5 the lady just shrugged her shoulders!Now I know it is not a large sum of money, it is the fact that they can just cancel my mobile number and keep my money without even sending me a message to warn me that this would happen if I did not use the phone!I actually switched on this phone regularly as I use it when just popping to the local shops but there was no information or contact from Orange. I only discovered their 'policy' when I called in to the store.I have now sent theman email but am still waiting for an explanation ot a reply.By the way, I have just realised that PAYG customers on most of these deals are charged 20p minimum per call and 10p per text!  As a light user it would not be worth while for me to take out a contract.I have now discovered that ASDA and Tesco only charge customers 8p to make a call and 4p per text! How can they do this when the phone companies charge so much more?Any advice would be appreciated.

Jean F Fernandez ● 5560d19 Comments ● 5555d

New book launch: Who was Jack the Stripper?

My second True Crime Story: Who was Jack the Stripper? will be launched at Abertillery Library sometime in March/April 2011. The book launch will coincide with a 1 hour drama/documentary to be aired throughout Britain and Europe focusing on Harold Jones, the killer of 2 school children in Abertillery, South Wales in 1921. (Google Harold Jones - The Welsh Killer, or Neil Milkins, or Jack the Stripper.)The documentary will be presented by television presenter and Kray Twins biographer Fred Dineage MBE and top British criminologist and criminal profiler Professor David Wilson. Jones was 15 when he murdered 8 year-old Freda Elsie Maud Burnell and 11 year-old Florence Irene Little in 1921. Jones was released from prison in 1941 having served 20 years for his crimes and owing to the turmoil of World War 11 he went off the police radar. During the times of the unsolved murders of 8 women in the Hammersmith district of London between 1959 and 1965, Jones lived in the Hammersmith district using various aliases. (He lived in Fulham, Putney and Hammersmith between 1947 and 1971 when he died.) Who was Jack the Stripper? examines the amazing links between Jones and the murdered women!Professor Bernard Knight who recovered and conducted the post mortems on all of Fred and Rosemary West's murder victims and "Taggart" creator Glenn Chandler have both read the manuscript for Who was Jack the Stripper? and have made positive comments on the amazing and startling coincidences linking Jones to the Hammersmith murders.Who was Jack the Stripper? is a follow up to Neil Milkins' top selling 2008 book: Every Mother's Nightmare - Abertillery in Mourning, which dealt in depth with the Harold Jones murders of Freda Burnell and Florence Little.Who was Jack the Stripper? will be distributed by:Neil Milkins, Rose Heyworth Press, 67 Arael View, Abertillery, Gwent NP13 1SU. Tel: 01495213744. n.milkin@sky.comemails and feedback welcomed. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------Forum Home

neil milkins ● 5559d0 Comments ● 5559d

Food & Drink Section of the Directory  -  suggested Updates

To the Editor:I've just been looking in the Food & Drink section of the Directory for some new ideas about where to dine out in Ealing and I fear many of the entries there may now be a bit out of date based on my own limited knowledge of the town centre. In the event that you might wish to bring this section up to date and make it more useful to your readership(and if it's not too impertinent!) here are the ones I'd suggest require updating or outright deletion. RestaurantsMy Old Dutch  -  closed down. Now called Crystal.Bella Italia  -  closed down, became Fogo, then closed again.Ealing Cottage.  Closed down.  Now called Molana.Coriander Leaf  -  closed downL'Amico Pizzeria  -  closed down.  Now called Abidan.Abba's  -  closed down.Chisimath Restaurant  -  closed down.  Now called Gospoda VitaPubsAll Bar One.  Closed down.  Now Halifax Building SocietyThe Spinning Wheel  -  closed down.  Soon to be a Sainsbury'sPark View  -  closed downThe Three Wishes  -  closed down. Reopened as Black GeorgeFinnegan's Wake  -  closed down. Reopened as The GroveThe Velvet Lounge  -  closed downThe Green  -  closed down.  Reopened as Cote.Ha Ha Bar & Canteen  -  closed down.  Reopened as FlavasThe Walsingham Arms  -  closed down.  Reopened as FlynnsDuffys  -  now called the Village InnSlug & Lettuce  -  now called the Sir Michael Balcon, an existing entry in the Directory.  Delete this entry.

Dominic Moore ● 5565d4 Comments ● 5565d

St Helena's Home 51 Drayton Green - likely to be demolished

From our news section.'110 year old site in West Ealing to be redevelopedFrom the WEN websitePreparation work has begun to demolish a historic building in Drayton Green.However objections have been raised about the plans by Notting Hill Housing Trust (NHHT) to build 30 flats and 6 town houses on the site which occupies almost an acre.St Helena's Home was built in 1896-7 and was run as a women's reformatory by nuns until 1940. It then became a girls' remand centre until 1965. The Chinese Government took over the place until NHHT bought the site for some £3.5 milliion a few years ago.West Ealing Neighbours (WEN) Ealing Civic Society and a number of residents have written to the council objecting to the building being bulldozed.The Council's web site is now showing the words 'Objection Raised' alongside the word 'Decision' in the Planning Application details (PP/2010/1733).WEN and Ealing Civic Society had tried to get English Heritage to list the building and protect it but weren't successful.However the original St Helena's Chapel Chapel now at 53 Drayton Green and owned by the International Presbyterian Church was listed earlier this year.The Chapel was designed by John Ninian Comper and was built in 1912-3' 65-79 it was a convent until IPC bought it. NHHT was offered the big block which IPC could not afford to keep but they did not proceed with alacrity and the Chinese communists bought it. AFAIK it was then unique, a communist embassy with a cross in the front.EH have indeed listed IPC's chapel, something I as a trustee wished the church to contest as I do not believe we were given statutory notice of intent by EH which gives one the time one need s to........So folks please object IPC will be submitting its own proposals for its share of the site but we are hindered by a listed building now.

Graham Weeks ● 5765d12 Comments ● 5568d

Please urge Angie Bray to speak up for Human Rights

Please note that the Coalition government is proposing a change to the law (Police Reform Bill) that will make it harder issue an arrest warrant in the UK for suspected war criminals and those who committed crimes against humanity. However, there is currently an Early Day Motion (EDM 108) in the house opposing this change to the law. This EDM is supported by 121 MPs which includes 32 Libdem MPs, 82 Labour MPs and the Green Party MP. I am happy to see that our two Ealing Labour MPs Stephen Pound and Virendra Sharma have signed this important EDM. However I note that there is only 1 Tory MP supporting the EDM which is Anne Main but unfortunately not our Ealing Central and Acton MP Angie Bray. According to Amnesty international there is simply no need to change the law and it seems the Coalition is motivated by political rather than legal concerns in pursuing this change.  It is important that the UK continues to stand up for human rights, but this change is giving the wrong signal about our position. We should not make it more difficult to arrest people like the Pinochets or the Milosovics of this world, wherever the crimes take place be they in the former Yugoslavia, Rwanda, Gaza or elsewhere in the Middle East. Can I urge people to write to Angie Bray MP asking her if she could speak out against clause 151 in the Police Reform Bill during the debates and to table amendments to this bill. For further information please see the Amnesty International website at www.amnesty.org.uk/actions_details.asp?ActionID=676 ORhttp://conradbryan.blogspot.com/2010/12/angie-bray-mp-should-speak-up-for.html

Conrad Bryan ● 5584d6 Comments ● 5571d

Christmas Eve Shopping/Activities Act at Ealing Town Centre

Tesco open till seven.Crispins Wine Bar (where real film people and real Ealing people go) is open 'till late (opposite Pitzhanger Manor down fromt the Oxfam bookshop).St Mary's Church (350 yards to the south of Crispin's has midnight communion at 11:30 (23:30). St. Mary's tends to be pretty ecumenical so Christian denominations other than Anglican are also welcome.Ealing Abbey (Roman Catholic) 350 yards in opposite direction from Crispins of the top of Eaton Rise north of Haven Green starts to function at  11.00pm with Matins Morning Prayer of Christmas Dayled by the Monastic Community with Carols at 11.30pm with the Ealing Abbey Choir followed by Midnight Mass 12.00/midnight. This huge church is usually packed by 11:00pm so if you want to sit down get there at 10:00!!!For those of you who need some some minute shopping tonight Tesco in the shopping centre closes its doors at 7.00 pm (19:00). Do not go past Ealing Broadway Station by car as there is a burst watermain which is slowing things up somewhat. The burst main was flooding the road yesterday and Thames Water deined to attend this afternoon!. The main is quite a large, definitely six inches diameter if not seven or eight. One wonders which Thames Water did not do anything sooner as if this had gone completely it would have washed out quite a few shops if not the railway station itself. The leak appears to be in a welded joint between two pipe sections.Happy Christmas!Maggie.

Maggie Tomlinson ● 5582d0 Comments ● 5582d

Oyster Daylight Robbery ?

As its the season of goodwill I thought it best to warn everyone of the perils of using Oyster and assuming you are only paying the correct amount. Normally I have a season ticket, but as it finished last week and I have some holiday I decided to use pay as you go...put £30 on it on Sunday for 4 days travel - should be enough I thought....however by the time I had finished a busy days travel (zone 1-3) and started my journey this morning found that over £14 had been taken!Now I know that Oyster should only take up to the equivalent of a day travelcard (£8.60) - so I checked this when I arrived at Liverpool St station this morning and was told that I had not swiped out at the end of my homeward journey the previous night and been charged the princely sum of £6 (peak single jouney fare !!) for this. I can distinctly remember that the barrier I used to exit Ealing Broadway opened up when I presented my card, but also that the indicator light on the barrier remained red (not amber or green) so I can only presume that the barrier was faulty.I am sure I was one of over several hundred who used that one last night - making a nice Xmas bonus for someone!This morning - all the barriers were open to entry/exit. Inviting people to forget to swipe ?? Why is this done early morning / late evening ?? Definitely sharp practice in my book. On a very positive note - the ticket person at the station refunded me the fares over the total single day travelcard once I explained what I had done.

Niall Connolly ● 5586d5 Comments ● 5585d

Ealing Freegive Group

Reusing items saves money, reduces waste and is a way to do something positive for the environment. Items we throw away such as bed, television, clothes, furniture, printer, toys, sofa and computer can pass to someone in your community.If you haven't heard yet, there is a wonderful organisation called Ealing Freegive ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ealingfreegive ). Ealing Freegive Group connects people who are giving and getting unwanted items for free in the London Borough of Ealing. It's all about recycle, reuse, reduce and keeping good stuff out of landfills and, at the same time, helping someone in your community by gifting them the item you no longer need. Another benefit of using Ealing Freegive is that it encourages poeple to get rid of junk that we no longer need and promote community involvement in the process. By using Ealing Freegive, not only are you able to get rid of your item with the minimum of fuss; you will also be doing your part in stopping another reusable item ending up in a landfill. It's completely free to join.Visit Ealing Freegive Group at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ealingfreegiveFreegive group is active in all London boroughs. Find a group near you at http://www.freegive.co.uk/londonfg.htmHow freegive group works: 1. You have a television or clothes or furniture or printer or toys you were going to throw out.2. You join your local Freegive group.3. You post an offer on your local Freegive group.4. People respond to you if they are interested.5. You pick a recipient and arrange for them to collect the item.6. They take the item away.7. You let your local freegive group know that the item is no longer available by posting an item TAKEN message to the group. Note: If you need an item you can request one on your local freegive group in the same way by posting an item WANTED message to the group and if someone has what you’re looking for they will contact you to offer it.This is a great idea! Encouraging people to reuse and recycle things by giving them away and not sending them to the garbage bin! Ealing Freegive is a great way to build a bond in the community and it's always good to recycle. Fantastic idea and everyone should join!

Amy Willson ● 5586d1 Comments ● 5585d

How some can bend the system and others cannot

Interesting to see a builder fined for his unauthorised dumping and scaffolding in South Ealing. Intersting too the quotes from Cllr Mahfouz.Maybe he should have taken a walk around a few other streets in South ealing and ask a few questions of the lack of joined up enforcement in the monitoring of building and planning in this town.How about this for blatant abuse of the system: 1. Erect a new fence and wall around your property, but quietly move the boundary 4 inches or so out into the pavement by claiming the cemented area between the pavement and the property.2. Hope no-one will notice or have photographs of said pavement.3. Wait a short while and put in a planning application for works.4. Somehow, find a way that leaves residents affected uninformed over alterations 5. Build right out to the new line demolishing part of 'new fence and wall.6. Fit gas heating vents and condensor outlets that overhang pavement and blow fumes and steam into faces of pedestrians at face height7. Get away with it.How? Well question 4 remains unexplained by LBE and the local residents associations.As for the encroaching of the pavement well it is for highways to notice and act, but as it was some months prior to the planning application, no-one checked or noticed...or did they? Some residents have keen eyes and did notice.Highways do not have to inform building control or planning of any discrepancy or where the correct boundary should be. No-one at planning noticed or checked until it was too late.  Only a few inches, but principals should exist here surely? Or we would all be doing it.As for heating equipment, Building control apparently require nothing more than a safety certificate from the gas fitter.Yet other heating vents are refused on grounds of being to near to other properties of people. But it's ok to have it straight in ones face? On a footway that has a lot of users?So how come it appears to be one rule for some and a different one for others?Cosy relationships with officers and architects/builders?Resident with good contacts?Who knows, but clearly some scheming has been going on somewhere.

Oliver Gregan ● 5596d5 Comments ● 5591d

Meanest traffic warden in Ealing??!!

Last night (Friday 10th December) at around 6 pm I went to buy a Christmas tree from 'The Christmas Forest' outlet opposite the Ramada Hotel with my 10 year old daughter to buy a Christmas tree.I parked immediately outside of the fence to the outlet where there was a notice which said clearly that the area was 'designated parking for customers of the Christmas Forest'.Within less than 10 minutes we had purchased a tree but when we returned to the car to load up, an Ealing traffic warden was in the process of giving me a parking ticket.He refused to withdraw the ticket as apparently no-one from the company had had the area de-designated from a single yellow line which was in force until 6:30 pm, even though I said I was loading up. He said that there had been a couple of incidents before where he had pointed this out to staff working at the facility so effectively I am the sacrificial lamb(!). We tried to make him see reason and to take it up with the company but as the law stands I am unlikely to win an appeal, given that the notice was on private land, and that the company had apparently been warned that parking was not permitted on that road at that time. It also is an utter waste of my time in this busy festive season and caused my daughter considerable distress in what should have been a pleasant family experience.In future I will buy my Christmas tree from an outlet where a £100 parking fine does not come as part of the package....Have any other readers had a similar experience or know of other examples of council wardens showing a complete lack of flexibility or common sense?

Andy Holt ● 5596d6 Comments ● 5594d

Check supermarket receipts

I have been asked to post the following, which seems to possibly be a new scam. I have not experienced it myself but do agree the bills need to be scrutined before leaving the supermarket and very often one does find " errors " have crept in. The most often occurring reasons being reduced items going through at the original price or taking an article from a place where it's price seems to be deliberately misleading. When that happens I always reject the item and call for the Manager and show them the area of the misleading item.        "CHECK YOUR RECEIPTS BEFORE LEAVING THE CHECK-OUT - READ ON...I bought a bunch of stuff, over £150, & I glanced at my receipt as the cashier was handing me the bags. I saw a cash-back of £40. I told her I didn't request a cash back & to delete it. She said I'd have to take the £40 because she couldn't delete it. I told her to call a supervisor.The supervisor came & said I'd have to take it. I said NO! Taking the £40 would be a cash advance against my Credit card & I wasn't paying interest on a cash advance!! If they couldn't delete it then they would have to delete the whole order. So the supervisor had the cashier delete the whole order & re-scan everything! The second time I looked at the electronic pad before I signed & a cash-back of £20 popped up. At that point I told the cashier & she deleted it. The total came out right. The cashier agreed that the Electronic Pad must be defective.Obviously the cashier knew the electronic pad was 'defective' because she NEVER offered me the £40 at the beginning. Can you imagine how many people went through before me & at the end of her shift how much money she pocketed?Just to alert everyone. My co worker went to Milford , XXXXXXXXX supermarket last week. She had her items rung up by the cashier. The cashier hurried her along and didn't give her a receipt. She asked the cashier for a receipt and the cashier was annoyed and gave it to her. My co worker didn't look at her receipt until later that night. The receipt showed that she asked for £20 cash back. SHE DID NOT ASK FOR CASH BACK!My co-worker called XXXXXXXXX supermarket who investigated but could not see the cashier pocket the money. She then called her niece who works for the bank and her niece told her this... "This is a new scam going on. The cashier will key in that you asked for cash back and then hand it to her friend who is the next person in the queue".Please, please, please check your receipts right away when using credit or debit cards!I wonder how many "seniors" have been, or will be, "stung" by this one????To make matters worse ...THIS SCAM CAN BE DONE ANYWHERE, AT ANY RETAIL ORWHOLESALE LOCATION!!!BEFORE LEAVING THE CHECK-OUT........CHECK YOUR RECEIPT!!!!!THIS COULD HAPPEN ANYWHERE. CHECK YOUR RECEIPT BEFORE LEAVING THE STAND.PLEASE PASS THIS ON TO YOUR FRIENDS, KIDS, LOVED ONES. "

Tony Price ● 5611d22 Comments ● 5603d

Local Police Response - 2010 Style

Safer Neighbourhood Policing was launched by the Metropolitan Police in April 2004. So...after more than six years how is it working out?Yesterday morning at 7:45am in broad daylight after being awoken by a tapping sound I spotted a stranger standing next to my car in the drive of my house. By the time I'd put on dressing gown and slippers and unlocked the front door he had disappeared. When my wife got in the car to go to work at 8:45 am she saw that the front offside small window of the car had been shattered.At 9:30am my son called me on his way to work to tell me that the passenger door of a van had been smashed just 50 yards from my house. Later in the morning I found out a neighbour across the road had his car front door window smashed.I got onto the Met's web site and noted the two telephone numbers for my Ward (Cleveland) Safer Neighbourhood Police (SNP). I called both numbers (020 8721 2920 and 07879 694696). I got no reply to either number and to my amazement neither number offered me the opportunity to leave a message.I then emailed the Cleveland SNP using the email address on the Met web site.At 6:30pm last night I called both telephone numbers again and got no answer and no messaging service from either. This morning at 10:15am I called both numbers and got no response. I've had no response to my email.14,000 people live in Cleveland Ward. Its population is the same as the Cathedral City of Eley in Cambridgeshire. Eley has a Police Station which is open six days a week. Cleveland Ward Ealing has no Police Station and the Cleveland Police don't answer phone calls or emails. So quite how does this constitute a local Police service? Can anyone advise me here?

Eric Alan Leach ● 5627d9 Comments ● 5614d

What will North Acton / Park Royal be like in 2026 MEETING 10TH NOVEMBER

Ealing development strategy sets out their vision for the future development of the borough. This is now being put forward for public consultation. They propose to:* make ealing a better place to live - Where are the proposals to improve our area?* To make Ealing one of the safest places to live - HOW?* To reduce health inadiqualities - HOW and WHERE are the improved local medical facilities????The development strategy will affect how, where and when the council propose to meet their targets for:HOUSING:1500 residential units: tower blocks at North Acton Station (SOUTHERN GATEWAY - Trentham Court has already been vastly reposessed with drug takiung squatters taking residence in empty flats! - Do we really want more of this???) I CAN PROVE THIS.500 residential units on the sites of the A40 Western Avenue green Corridor (bearing in mind that the pollution is so high here the windows for the proposed development are forbidden to overlook the A40 on health grounds DUE TO POLLUTION)LACK OF SCHOOL PLACES: this is at crisis point (proposal to build a new school in the West Acton area (where and when??? our schools are already at bursting point)EMPLOYMENTPotential net increase of 2000 office jobs (considering the current climate I don't think so)Continuing shift from manufacturing to distributiuon based employment.More cars and vans. Where will they park??? My road is already impossible to park in and there are only 8 houses in my street.WHERE IS THE INFASTRUCTUIRE TO SUPPORT THIS EXPANSION???* No new doctors or dentists* No community amenities - leisure facilities community centre etc.* No new green recreational space* No upgrade to North Acton tube station, just cosmetic improvement to station entrance* Air and noise pollution levels are cvery high (see front page). What measures are they taking to improcve our environment?WEST LONDON WASTE PLANE5out of ^ proposed sites for the West London Waste Plane are located in Park Royal. These are due to be discussed at Ealing Cabinet today. POTENTIONALLY our are could have a waste transfer station frrom energy waste plant facility.PLEASE COME TO THIS MEETING.... WE NEED THE SUPPORT OF RESIDENTS AS WE IMPROVE OUR QUALITY OF LIFE6.45 - 9PM WEDNESDAY 10TH NOVEMBERINCO EUROPE LTD, BASHLEY ROAD, PARK ROYAL, NW10 6SNWE DO NOT NEED MORE HOUSING IN THIS AREA WE ARE ALREADY OVERCROWDED. EALING COUNCIL KEEP TRYING TO OFFLOAD EXCESS HOUSING NEEDS ONTO THE ACTON AREA. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH. KEEP THE GREEN CORRIDOR. Ealing seem to be passing their housing problems on over polluted and over crowded Acton.Please show your support.

Emma Daniels ● 5628d0 Comments ● 5628d

West Ealing Family Day October 23rd 10am - 4pm

West Ealing Neighbours, local businesses and traders and the Council have joined together to put on the first ever West Ealing Family Day. Across the centre of West Ealing in Leeland Road, Melbourne Avenue and St James Avenue we will be putting on a series of events and activities for all the family.  The three streets will be differently themed:Leeland Road will have a specially extended farmers' market with apples as a theme (it's Apple Day on October 21st). There will be an exhibition of over 100 rare and different varieties of apple, cider tasting, apple and spoon racing and an apple juicing demonstrationMelbourne Avenue will be for food and entertainment with a stage set up for a variety of local music and dance events as well as children's entertainment and food stallsSt James Avenue is all about what people local people are producing, whether its crafts or artworks, and will play host to the first ever street craft market in West Ealing.  WEN's Abundance team will be busy making apple and pear juice all pressed from locally picked fruit and St James Church will house an art exhibition by the Brent Lodge Park Arts Collective  - a collective of artists with and without learning difficulties.  The church will also open its cafe where you can put your feet up and try locally made cakes and sandwiches.Please do come along and support us and help make this first ever Family Day a success... and, if it's a success, maybe we can gain enough support to make it an annual event.

Diane Gill ● 5661d7 Comments ● 5644d

Going Down The Pan???

I must say I have to agree with the article on Ealing Today with regard to the state of public loos - that is if one can find them!I would never use those modern toilets shaped like a pillbox - being rather claustrophobic I would hate to be stuck inside one of those contraptions!What about the toilets in theatres??? Very few loos for the ladies with a queue a mile long - trying to use the facilities before the show starts. In the meantime the gents just nip in and out of their loos - no problem!!! These places must have been designed by men!!!Westminster tops my list for well kept public toilets - they are usually clean and tidy with an attendant on the premises! Ealing Browadway is fine because the toilets in the shoppng mall are also well maintained.Some of the train stations charge about 30p to use the toilets - I think that is far too much, some of those toilets are absolutely awful! At least if they must levy a charge ensure that they are CLEAN!It is places such as West Ealing where it is almost impossible to locate a public toilet which means having to go into a restaurant, buy tea or coffee and then use the facilities - which rather defeats the object of the exercise! One can understand the restaurtants wishing to only alllow customers to use the rest room.Walpole Park, which is mentioned in the article, is typical of neglected public toilets. Badly maintained, tiny sink, cold water, no soap. Not a very pleasurable experience and bearing in mind the number of visitors to the park especially during the summer months when events are taking place, this really is not acceptable.In a previous post I mentioned being unable to find a public toilet on a unday morning in Piccadilly Station. Their facilities do not open until 10am - what is one supposed to do in the meantime?  Fortunately a staff member directed me to the toilet which is for staff use only (a dreadful looking loo if ever I saw one) but at least she saved the day. I was somewhat surprised at her question before she allowed me to visit their loo though - she wanted to know whether I was taking drugs! I ask you! What is the world coming to?I don't know action can be taken to improve the state and availability of public toilets but hopefully with the 2012 Olympics coming to London something will be done about it!Comments anyone???

Jean F Fernandez ● 5705d20 Comments ● 5652d

CPZ permit hike

Having just read that CPZ charges are to be hiked up, I cannot believe the rubbish uttered by the councillor in charge.I can only assume the man is naive and has not done his homework or must have been spoon fed innaccurate information that frankly amounts to pure stalinist propaganda ( or naziist if you prefer)I recall attending a few public meetings several years ago when there was a lot of concern about the imposition of Zone C and some of the irregularities of it's consultation.I'm sure that a few others (as there were a few hundred at these meetings who recall this)Ealing Council officials Daniel Metzger, a lady called Eva and 2  Labour councillors went to great lengths to assure unhappy residents that the charges would be ringfenced and would only increase at the rate of inflation.The intention was that the CPZs were not and will not be used as a revenue earning scheme and would self fund. It was a benefit not to just residents with cars but those who did not have cars.In fact, I remember statistics being read out that showed a large proportion of residents without vehicles were in favour of the scheme as it it would allow visitors to park outside their homes.They insisted that the set cost of the permits would be maintained and would never increase by any more than a few percent after 5 years.This was despite the wobbly predicament of the then Labour council who at least were prepared to be fair and listen.The following Tory administration honoured this and also left the borough in a far better financial situation in spite of the current problems at national levelThis they insisted was the cornerstone of the scheme and was to allow fairness for those less well off. In fact the desire was to allow free permits for residents over 70.This is the terms that residents myself included, voted on and after a lot of work with residents groups and associations, the principals and terms upon which Ealings CPZ exist.This is no doubt all on record and no doubt needs to be reminded to the present administration who clearly have not done their homework.To renague on a scheme that was to quote " A Partnership with residents" is a breach of the contract and Ealing are surely voiding the CPZs and are duty bound to reconsult all residents in a CPZ.Residents were also assured the right to request a review of their CPZ and vote to discontinue their zone. Something else that was assured.Quite probably an increase of more than 5% is illegal.

Oliver Gregan ● 5681d23 Comments ● 5672d

Free Open Source Software

Hello,   I have just received this link,"Government "committed" to using more open source" http://www.computerworlduk.com/news/public-sector/3239664/government-committed-to-using-more-open-source/?olo=email&no1x1   Many years ago the government asked the BBC to produce a series of programmes to provide some basic education about computers and computing. The BBC designed a small computer that could be programmed using either BASIC or machine code and use a variety of different functions and hardware connection ports. These computers were popular in schools, and many people who started with the BBC computers went on to become top programmers.   The advent of school parent-governors brought criticisms that students knew about computers but needed further instruction in the use of business computers, so schools abandoned teaching about computers and substituted teaching the use of specific Microsoft packages. Microsoft was delighted to provide free copies to schools and their staff, and create lock-in.   In the last few years there have been increasing numbers of complaints about this lock-in, and the government funded BECTA organization ceased to specify Microsoft packages, suggesting instead that schools should use computers. I recently heard that BECTA has been terminated.   I attended two large seminars organised by Tony Blair under Chatham House rules at which representatives of many well known organizations, companies, universities, broadcasters, and other interested persons discussed how Britain should be introduced to the huge range of facilities available, but Tony Blair relied on the advice, etc, freely given by his friend Bill Gates, the owner of Microsoft, so there were few changes.   I believe that the UK education system has almost totally failed to teach the full use of computing power, substituting instead superficial use of a poor quality restrictive and expensive commercial system. Free top quality Unix compatible operating systems and associated software have been available for many years.   Unix compatible systems present few problems for average users, but they are designed to be maintained by an administrator with some knowledge of the system.   There are plenty of University level courses available, but very little practical help for new users, who are expected to dive in using just the documentation available. I have spent a long time trying to persuade Ealing council to provide facilities, but the "Adult Learning" department have indicated that they do not have a clue about the subject. Previous attempts to contact the Ealing general education department resulted in a similar response. I have been told that Ealing Technical Services do use Unix compatible systems, including BSD, Sun Solaris, and Linux.   I met Margaret Mills who runs the Hanwell Community Centre and she was absolutely delighted at the prospect of a community based facility, but the centre was about to be closed for building maintenance. Ealing Council then decided to convert several of the biggest and best rooms to a computer learning suite, to be used by the council during the working day but it was to be specifically Microsoft Only.   There are probably insufficient qualified tutors in the UK, but I believe that community based schemes providing shared facilities can help to provide new user assistance for all ages, advanced collaborative development, and a pool of expertise for commercial projects. I have received hardware for a community project from various donors including the Physics department at Imperial College, but have met apathy and ignorance elsewhere. The majority of large organizations use secure Unix compatible systems, and they are very well known throughout the rest of the world, but Britain has fallen well behind.   I have heard about some community organizations around Birmingham, Bristol, and Sheffield that have permanent facilities and are doing well, and there are organized groups in London which can occasionally use facilities provided by universities, but there is a need for facilities that can be left partially configured at the end of the day, ready for further work later.   I have given away hundreds of CD and DVD demonstration discs, and met many IT professionals running shops and businesses who have expressed an interest in learning about Unix compatible systems, but I am not able to give one to one instruction for all individuals on demand.   I met a librarian working in Acton library who went to India for three weeks just to attend a Linux course because he could not attend one in England.   A friend who visited China on business told me that the only computers he found that were running Microsoft were the airport flight information computers, and they had all crashed to blue screens. All other computers were running Linux. The Chinese are only interested in quality and reliability, not the cost (they do not pay anyway).   I recently attended a joint GLLUG/UKUUG talk at UCL by Dr. Eng Lim Goh of SGI on the use of the SGI UltraViolet series of computers. There were several extremely high quality examples shown of computer simulations including high speed global weather changes, advance predictions of tornado locations, the effects of a tsunami hitting Tokyo, the electrical activity around a human heart, and the effects of a bird strike on a Rolls Royce engine, all using a single multi-core computer running a single copy of the standard Linux kernel. There is no other easily available system that could run these computers at any price. www.gllug.org.uk   Three of the top twenty data centre providers in the world run on Microsoft, eleven on Linux, and the rest either BSD or unspecified.    Linux runs over 80% of the top 500 supercomputer systems in the world, many standard computer, networking, and telephony products. It is generally secure and efficient, but because it is free there is no PR budget, little advertising, and no unofficial inducement to journalists or suppliers. The UK is generally ignorant of what is available, and is fed a superficial lightweight trivia diet rather than useful information. I am sure that the general public would be interested to see more about what is available to them as Free Open Source Software.   I have a large wheeled rack that would accommodate the stack of IBM servers previously used as part of a large number cruncher in the Physics department of Imperial College, a Cisco router, and some other equipment previously used in education and business. The hardware from Imperial College was replaced by a larger and more powerful Linux cluster ready for work on the data arriving from CERN, but this country also pays to dispose of huge amounts of perfectly adequate computer hardware, often just because the installed operating system has become outdated and replaced by the equally restrictive latest version.   I would be delighted to help set up a local community facility so that a self help group could learn more, but there has been little response other than apprehension, apathy, and ignorance. I have however been asked to help set up a facility in North Harrow. It will be further for me to travel, and little advantage to my near neighbours. My father was born in East Acton, and I have lived all my life in North Acton, my sister lives in East Acton.

Chris Bell ● 5679d14 Comments ● 5676d

John Henry Newman - the local connection

In the light of the papal visit to beatify Newman, here is the local connection to the then Anglican Newman.'In May 1808, John Henry Newman arrived at Great Ealing School as a boarder. A large private School of about 290 boys, it was run along the lines of the public schools by the genial Dr George Nicholas. ‘Dr Nicholas . . . was accustomed to say that no boy had run through the school, from the bottom to the top, so rapidly as John Newman.’  At the end of his time at Ealing School, John Henry underwent his conversion, influenced by Thomas Scott. '. . . to whom (humanly speaking)  I almost owe my soul.'  Scott was an Evangelical writer and clergyman who in his The Force of Truth traced his gradual recovery from a period of Arianism and then Unitarianism, to attainment of a firm and fervent Trinitarian faith. Newman confessed, 'I so admired and delighted in his writings that, when I was an undergraduate, I thought of making a visit to his parsonage, in order to see a man whom I so deeply revered.' - http://www.birmingham-oratory.org.uk/newman/Supplement.pdfFrom Wikipedia, 'Great Ealing School was situated on St Mary's Road, Ealing W5 London and was founded in 1698. In its heyday of the 19th century, it was as famous as Eton or Harrow, being considered "the best private school in England".[The school first took up residence in Ealing's Old Rectory. This was a moated house with a magnificent garden which stood next to the church of St Mary where Ranelagh Road now runs and all the way northward, along St Mary's Road to Warwick Road. The school had a swimming pool, cricket greens, tennis courts and the once famous Fives courts. A row of five cottages were used as studies. Opposite the school was the parish workhouse, where the poor and infirm slept three or more to a bed. [2] [3]The King of France, Louis-Philippe, taught mathematics and geography at the school. He did this to support himself whilst living in exile in Twickenham between 1800 and 1815. [4]Eventually, the Rectory succumbed to dry rot and had to relocate in 1847.[2]It moved from the north side of St. Mary's Church in Ealing on the eastern side of St Mary's Road to the western side of the same road and was renamed The Owls, which then formed part of its crest. In 1874, it became a day school teaching vocational subjects such as bookkeeping. In 1879, it changed again, becoming a school for Jewish boys.It closed in 1908 and the roads Cairn Avenue and Nicholas Gardens now stand upon the grounds. The latter is named after the famous headmastering family of its greatest period.Famous PupilsWilliam S. Gilbert of Gilbert and SullivanThomas Huxley - scientistFrederick Marryat - authorCardinal Newman - churchmanHicks Pasha - soldierHenry Rawlinson - soldier and adventurerZachary Pearce (1690–1774) Bishop of Rochester. George Augustus Selwyn (1809-1878) , First Bishop of New Zealand.Charles Knight. Publisher

Graham Weeks ● 5690d0 Comments ● 5690d

Proper label for A remarkable visitor to Ealing

Latest news tells of an interesting biker from Minsk who is travelling the world at age 69 for over 10 years now.  Good human interest story BUTam not happy with the labels deaf mute - here is why in a lift below from WikipediaSo should the description used be better and how do deaf or deafened forum members view this?For "deafness", see hearing impairment. For "Deaf" as a cultural term, see Deaf culture. For "inability to speak", see muteness.Deaf-mute is a term which was used historically, by hearing people, to identify a person who was both deaf and could not speak. The term continues to be used to refer to deaf people, mainly within a historical context, to indicate deaf people who cannot speak, or have some degree of speaking ability, but choose not to speak because of the negative or unwanted attention atypical voices sometimes attract.The classification has a particular importance in Jewish law; deaf-mutes were not moral agents, and therefore were unable to own real estate, act as witnesses, or be punished for any crime.In the past deaf-mute was regarded as a socially acceptable term, usually to describe deaf people who use a signed language, but in modern times, the term is frequently viewed as derogatory[citation needed][neutrality is disputed]. The preferred term today is simply "deaf"[1].Additionally, it is sometimes used to refer to other hearing people in jest, to chide, or to invoke an image of someone who refuses to employ common sense or who is unreliable. "Deaf and dumb,"[2] "semi-deaf" and "semi-mute" are other historic references to deaf people. Of these latter examples, only "deaf and dumb" prevails as a reference.There are connotations of insensitivity to deaf people concerning these terms of reference and for this reason the prevailing terms are generally looked upon as insulting, inaccurate or socially and politically incorrect.[3] From antiquity (as noted in the Code of Hammurabi) until recent times,[4] the terms "deaf-mute" and "deaf and dumb" were even considered analogous to "idiot" by some hearing people.In Europe and Western society, most deaf people are taught to speak with varying outcomes of ability or degrees of fluency. The simple identity of "deaf" has been embraced by the community of signing deaf people since the foundations of public deaf education in the 18th century and remains the preferred term of reference or identity for many years.

Colin Izzard ● 5716d0 Comments ● 5716d

Great Family Event on the 19th September

Yellow Umbrella Day is a charity event run by The Chiswick Park Communities Trust (registered charity number 1123584). This is a family charity event which raises profile and funding for three local children’s charities; The Kids’ Cookery School, The Log Cabin and The Shooting Star Children’s Hospice.  There will be a 10k sponsored run (the Runbrella) and 5k sponsored walk (the Mini Umbrella) departing from Chiswick Park at 11am.  The run and walk take in some of the beautiful Chiswick environment and avoid busy roads ensuring it is safe for all the family!  There is also the Woddle (for toddlers) at 12pm. Entertainment at Chiswick Park from 12pm – 4pm promises not to disappoint.  We have live performances from Suspiciously Elvis who will be bringing his nine piece band and four feather girls to Viva Chiswick Park!  There will be plenty of activities and fun for children of all ages including cookery classes, pony rides, badge making, arts and crafts, attractions, giant scalectrix, football workshops and plenty of food and drink.This year there will be an exclusive prize draw for those who have raised or donated over £100.  This will be first draw of the day and the winner will get their choice from all prizes.  The top prizes at present are:• An acoustic guitar signed by Jack Johnson • Original Disney artwork worth over £2,000 • Exclusive screening for you and 53 friends at Paramount’s private cinema • A recording session at Teddington studios • A child’s bicycle and lots more…..To find out more about Yellow Umbrella Day or sign up for the run or the walk or be a volunteer please visit our website www.yellowumbrelladay.comHope to see you at Yellow Umbrella Day on Sunday 19th September.

Anna Kriek ● 5719d0 Comments ● 5719d

Still time to act ?, as sent to me today

Iran stoning case, Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani is at imminent risk of execution in Tabriz prison. Moreover, her well known human rights lawyer, Mohammad Mostafaei, is in prison in Turkey after having fled the country to evade arrest for his advocacy work. His wife remains in prison in Iran – held hostage – until he is remanded into the regime’s custody (http://stopstonningnow.com/wpress/?p=1652). Given Turkey’s close relations with the Islamic Republic of Iran, Mostafaei can face deportation back to Iran even though he has applied for refugee status with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees there. Campaigners are concerned about the safety of Mostafaei and his wife. We are also extremely concerned for Ashtiani’s life. The regime may be preparing to execute her within the next few days, particularly given that the Tabriz prosecutor has demanded her execution and is awaiting the Tehran high court’s confirmation (http://stopstonningnow.com/wpress/?p=1665). In her most recent heart-wrenching message, she says: “I am now quiet and sad because a part of my heart is frozen. The day I was flogged in front of [my son] Sajjad, I was crushed and my dignity and heart were broken. The day I was given the stoning sentence, it was as if I fell into a deep hole and I lost consciousness. Many nights, before sleeping, I think to myself how can anybody be prepared to throw stones at me; to aim at my face and hands? Why? I thank all of you from Tabriz Prison. Mrs [Mina] Ahadi, tell everyone that I’m afraid of dying. Help me stay alive and hug my children.” As a result the public outcry, Brazilian president Lula da Silva has offered Ashtiani asylum there. Ashtiani has accepted the offer (http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/2010/08/sakineh-ashtiani-accepts-brazilian.html). The regime, however, has rejected it and continues to push for her execution and to disseminate misinformation on her case. It says it intends not to stone her but to execute her for murdering her husband. At the 30 July press conference in London, Mina Ahadi exposed the regime’s misinformation on the case and revealed court documents showing Ashtiani’s sentence of death by stoning for adultery. [In fact, she was acquitted of any murder charges; even those found guilty of murdering her husband have not been executed at the request of the victim’s family.] At the 30 July press conference, Maryam Namazie also refuted claims made by the embassy of the Islamic regime of Iran in London and the former French ambassador to Iran that stonings in Iran were rare; she referred to a new report published by the International Committee against Executions which has found that over 100 people have been stoned with 25 known cases currently awaiting death by stoning in Iran (http://www.iransolidarity.org.uk/Stoning%20List%20(1989-2010)_edited.doc). Other speakers at the press conference AC Grayling spoke of the contradiction between a medieval government and a progressive population wanting to be free whilst Peter Tatchell stressed the importance of supporting Sakineh and all those languishing on death row. Given the imminent risk of execution faced by Ashtiani and the insecure status of her lawyer in Turkey we urge the public to act now. Ashtiani’s stoning and execution orders must be rescinded, she must be immediately released and there must be an end to stoning and executions. PLEASE ACT NOW! 1- Send Sakineh a postcard of the city you live in or are visiting this summer telling her you are thinking of her and other prisoners on death row in Tabriz prison. You can address it to:Sakineh Mohammadi AshtianiTabriz PrisonTabriz, Iranhttp://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&ie=UTF8&q=tabriz+prison&fb=1&gl=uk&hq=prison&hnear=Tabriz,+Iran&view=map&cid=5511433647417998115&iwloc=A&ved=0CBcQpQY&sa=X&ei=kRVbTK2HKJOe_gaemtzoBA 2- Write letters of protest to the Islamic regime of Iran demanding Ashtiani’s release and an end to stonings and executions. Protest letters can be addressed to the below: Head of the JudiciarySadeqh LarijaniHowzeh Riyasat-e Qoveh Qazaiyeh (Office of the Head of the Judiciary)Pasteur St., Vali Asr Ave., south of Serah-e JomhouriTehran 1316814737, IranEmail: info@dadiran.ir or via website: http://www.dadiran.ir/tabid/75/Default.aspxFirst starred box: your given name; second starred box: your family name; third: your email address Head of the Judiciary in East Azerbaijan ProvinceMalek-Ashtar SharifiOffice of the Head of the Judiciary in TabrizEast Azerbaijan, Iran Sayed ‘Ali KhameneiThe Office of the Supreme LeaderIslamic Republic Street - Shahid Keshvar Doust StreetTehran, IranEmail: via website: http://www.leader.ir/langs/en/index.php?p=letter (English)http://www.leader.ir/langs/fa/index.php?p=letter (Persian) Secretary General, High Council for Human RightsMohammad Javad LarijaniHowzeh Riassat-e Ghoveh GhazaiyehPasteur St, Vali Asr Ave., south of Serah-e JomhuriTehran 1316814737, IranFax: +98 21 3390 4986Email: bia.judi@yahoo.com 3- Sign petitions in support of her case if you haven’t already done so. Here are two of them: http://stopstonningnow.com/sakine/sakin284.php?nr=50326944&lang=en, http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_stoning/?cl=651962225&v=6766. 4- Write to government officials, heads of state, MEPs and MPs in your country of residence calling on them to intervene to save her life and to cease recognition of a regime that stones people to death in the 21st century. See Mina Ahadi’s recent letter to heads of states on this: http://stopstonningnow.com/wpress/?p=1694. 5- Join protests to save her life. On 10 August come out in support of Ashtiani. On 28 August join 100 cities against stoning. More information to follow. 6- Write to the Turkish government asking them to release Mohammad Mostafaei and to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees in Turkey urging them to grant him refugee status and expedite his resettlement to a safe third country. Prime MinisterRecep Tayyip ErdoganBasbakanlik06573 Ankara, TurkeyFax: +90-312-417 0476Minister of InteriorIcisleri Bakanligi06644 AnkaraFax: +90 312 417 23 90Minister of Foreign AffairsDisisleri Bakanligi06100 AnkaraFax: +90 312 419 1547webmaster@mfa.gov.trUNHCR - Branch Office in TurkeyTiflis Cad. 552. Sok. No: 3Sancak Mah. 06550 AnkaraTurkeyFax: +90 312 441 21 73Via website: http://www.unhcr.org.tr/MEP/index.aspx?pageKey=BizeUlasin 7- Donate to the important work of the International Committee Against Stoning, International Committee Against Executions and Iran Solidarity by making your cheque payable to ‘Count Me In – Iran’ and sending it to BM Box 6754, London WC1N 3XX, UK. You can also pay via Paypal (http://countmein-iran.com/donate.html). Please earmark your donation. NOTES: * See information on 30 July press conference in London here: http://www.youtube.com/user/rezamoradi and here: http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/2010/07/press-coverage-on-30-july-press.html. * See clip of Islamic Republic’s state TV’s misinformation on the 24 July International Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani Day protests we organised and Ashtiani’s case. The regime blurs out her face, uses only her initials and says she was sentenced to execution for brutally murdering her husband. A translation of the court document sentencing her to death by stoning for adultery is available here which refutes their statements on her case: http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/2010/07/islamic-regime-of-irans-broadcast-on-24.html. * See a report of the successful 24 July International Sakineh Mohammadi Ashtiani Day here: http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/2010/07/24-july-huge-success.html and here: http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/2010/07/media-coverage-of-24-july-2010-world.html. * For more information contact:Mina Ahadi, Germany, International Committee Against Stoning and International Committee Against Executions Coordinator, minaahadi@aol.com, 0049 1775692413; http://notonemoreexecution.org/; http://stopstonningnow.com. Maryam Namazie, UK, Iran Solidarity Spokesperson, iransolidaritynow@gmail.com, 0044 7719166731, Iran Solidarity: www.iransolidarity.org.uk; http://iransolidarity.blogspot.com/.

Tony Price ● 5721d0 Comments ● 5721d

Great Family Event

We wanted you to be one of the first to know about Yellow Umbrella Day 2010.Yellow Umbrella Day is a charity event run by The Chiswick Park Communities Trust (registered charity number 1123584). The day raises funds for three local children’s charities; The Kids’ Cookery School, The Log Cabin and The Shooting Star Children’s Hospice.  There will be the 10k sponsored run (the Runbrella) and 5k sponsored walk (the Mini Umbrella) departing from Chiswick Park at 11am and the Woddle (for the toddlers) at 12pm.  Entertainment at Chiswick Park from 12pm – 4pm promises to be bigger and better than before with live performances from Suspiciously Elvis who will be bringing his 9 piece band and 4 feather girls to Viva Chiswick Park!  There will be plenty of activities and fun for children of all ages including cookery classes, pony rides, badge making, arts and crafts, attractions, giant scalectrix, football workshops and plenty of food and drink.This year there will be an exclusive prize draw for those who have raised or donated over £100.  This will be first draw of the day and the winner will get their choice from all prizes.  The top prizes at present are:• An acoustic guitar signed by Jack Johnson • Original Disney artwork worth over £2,000 • Exclusive screening for you and 53 friends at Paramount’s private cinema • A recording session at Teddington studios • A family ticket to a Middlesex CCC Twenty20 game and a tour of Lord’s • A child’s bicycle And much much more.....Please show your support this year and sign up to take part today.  It’s simple, just visit our website below to register for the 10k sponsored run or 5k sponsored walk or to be a volunteer. http://www.yellowumbrelladay.comHope to see you at Yellow Umbrella Day on Sunday 19th September.

Anna Kriek ● 5723d0 Comments ● 5723d

Ealing hospital exploitation - parking charges £3.50 minimum

I had the misfortune to go to Ealing hospital today for an x-ray, so I got out of my car to go and pay to see that the minimum charge for parking is:"up to 4 hours £3.50"YES - THREE-POUNDS-FIFTY MINIMUM CHARGE...and you have to type in your registration plate number to get a ticket, clearly to stop people from giving their unexpired ticket to someone else.The last 2 times I've been to the hospital was to A&E with my son, but my husband paid, so maybe it has been like this forever and I'm behind the times.Nevertheless, this is absolutely an outrageous and cynical way of generating revenue. Charge for parking, fine, everyone else does, but even if hospitals like the Chelsea & Westminster operate pay for what you use parking, vs. crazy minimum charges.I know the NHS needs to cut costs, just like every other government department, but generating extortionate revenues from the general population, particularly of the sick and elderly is a recurrent theme for hospitals, but it is seriously wrong.This will hit the poorest hardest. Even profit making companies, whose main source of income is parking fees e.g. NCP could not dream of such a pricing strategy as people would vote with their feet (or wheels) and go elsewhere, but oh, I forgot, this is a hospital, and there is no alternative for parking, so it is a captive audience, so yes, why not, let's just maximise the return.This is exploitation by a government body and it so wrong it makes me extremely angry.

Melissa Smith ● 5743d34 Comments ● 5724d

Door to Door Scam - The Organisation for Homeless and Unemployed People

The guy that I just gave a couple of bob to has a dog and a sob story. From Merton Community Safe.gov.ukResidents of Hillside please beware of a possible scam that may be happening on our ward. This was brought to our attention by a resident for which i am grateful. Young men are calling door to doore purporting to be selling selling goods for a charity (The Organisation for Homeless and Unemployed People). Well-spoken, smartly dressed young men have been reported harassing residents into buying household goods with various hard luck stories. The goods considered over-priced by the residents include tea towels for £7.99 and scrubbing brushes for £2.When residents have been reluctant or simply not interested they have either been cajoled with hard luck tales of how their livelihood depends on the sale or subjected to verbal abuse.The names given by the group are ‘The Organisation For Homeless & Unemployed People’ PO Box 2457 Woodford Green IG8 1EE and ‘The Homeless & Unemployed Workgroup’ POBox 66 Loughton, Essex IG10 3UQ.A query with the post office has uncovered that the PO Box numbers are false and neither postcodes exist in the Loughton and Woodford Green area.Under new Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2007 pressurising a consumer into buying a product or service by telling them that if they do not buy then the trader’s job or livelihood will be in jeopardy could be a prohibited practice. Trading with a name that is not identifiable also infringes basic consumer protection legislation. Residents are advised to report any sightings of this group to Merton Trading standards on 020 8545 4018 or their local police station’s Safer Neighbourhood Team. A list of the SNT offices and contact numbers can be found on the Metropolitan Police website in the Merton safer neighbourhood section.

Jas Wilkins ● 5725d0 Comments ● 5725d