Forum Topic

I used to go to the Watermans regularly but mainly for the cinema which combined cheap tickets and free parking. Don't recall ever going to a theatrical production there as they never really seemed to operate a regular programme. Its failure probably had more to do with poor build quality, the value of the site it occupied, Covid blowing a hole in the venue's finances and increased competition from new local cinemas. It can't be taken as an indication that the area can't support a theatre. 

From what I understand is that rising construction  and regulatory costs meant that the 'affordable' units at the Brentford Police station site weren't viable for the housing association originally involved in the deal and the whole thing has been held up by trying to persuade something to take it on. This has nothing whatsoever to do with the viability of the theatre on the site. As I've argued previously fake affordability requirements have contributed to the collapse of housing starts in London. Obviously no development which would incorporate a theatre as a planning gain is going to be proposed at this point. It could be the case that the government accepts this situation and residential construction simply ceases for the next few years or it could be that the problem is recognised and measures are take to stimulate activity which would allow mothballed projects to resume or be repurposed.  While there are a whole range of possible scenarios, one of them is that the council is aware of policy changes that will revive the Broadway Connection plans, the Mastcraft deal and a raft of other projects in the area. These could include a more flexible interpretation of planning gain exactly like the one that was used gain approval for the Brentford stadium which presented it as a community asset. It is in this scenario that a theatre gets built in the centre of Ealing. I'm not even claiming it is the most likely outcome but it does explain why the council are so adamant about moving forward with an unpopular policy that won't bring in that much revenue.

Gordon Southwell ● 14h

The Arts Trust running Watermans did nothing to promote the venue for years. Complacency or incompetence, who knows? They could have had live music, as they did in the early days, and certainly could have had more, and better, theatre productions.But once the site was earmarked as a prime location for swish new riverside apartments its fate was sealed. People I know who worked there have told me that it was dreadful. There was no impetus from management, happy to let it limp along. Covid did have an impact but the Watermans management came round with the begging bowl asking patrons to bail it out.There's no political will to replace it. Hounslow could follow the Ealing example of compulsory purchase that was applied to the Filmworks development when it stalled, but it won't. Regardless of the affordable housing element the revised Watermans plan is for a 'flexible arts space' (whatever that means) rather than the 'world class theatre' originally promised. Such venues are expensive to build and offer very little to no return for developers, unlike blocks of flats that can generate massive profits in the right area.Strange that you cite building costs. Other development in Brentford has gone on apace, notably the old Heidelberg site, while the old Watermans has lain rotting. There has been nothing to stop the Watermans redevelopment unless the rumours that the developers are in financial difficulties are true.Back to Ealing though. Where do you suggest a potential 1200 seat auditorium be built in or around the Broadway?

Simon Hayes ● 13h