The decision not to proceed with a full electric vehicle (EV) gully charging trial is perplexing, especially considering the anticipated shift from internal combustion engine (ICE) vehicles to hybrid and fully electric cars over the next few years.I understand the advantages of home charging and appreciate the cost savings during off-peak times. This not only benefits car owners but also helps the environment by allowing charging to occur without putting additional pressure on the grid or requiring extra resources.As noted in other comments, the EV charging sector outside of homes is highly commercialised. Companies that own the technology, in partnership with network providers, can set their own policies and pricing. For instance, some companies charge their employees different rates than they do for visitors. Similarly, sports clubs often charge their members significantly less than they do for non-members, making this an important revenue stream.I would like to see our council take advantage of this charging technology to benefit residents and their guests. However, I suspect the council will focus primarily on generating revenue, with residents ultimately seeing little to no benefit from it.Without the use of a freedom of information request, our council is unlikely to be transparent about charges, commercial relationships, and any commissions paid to the council.
Bill Trenchard ● 31d