Forum Topic

Floating bus stops, not such a great idea….

From Highways Magazine this week:The roll-out of floating bus stops has been halted by the Government as it responds to campaigns surrounding pedestrian safety.The Government has ordered an immediate suspension of bus stops where pedestrians board and disembark directly from or to a cycle lane.The pause was announced by Simon Lightwood, the local transport minister, in a statement to MPs on 26 June, with the minister referring to them as ‘problematic’ to people with visual impairments.The main concern highlighted by campaigners is that the floating stops force pedestrians – particularly vulnerable pedestrians or those with disabilities – to avoid cyclists using the bike lanes between the stops and the pavement.A UCL study commissioned by the charity The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association showed that guide dogs avoid using floating bus stops due to meeting cyclists travelling at speed.El Briggs, head of policy, public affairs and campaigns at The Guide Dogs for the Blind Association, said: ‘Our research has shown the significant fear, anxiety and distress caused by bus stop boarders for disabled people.‘Our research shows bus stop boarders are confusing, difficult to detect, and can create frightening near-misses with cyclists. No one should have to risk stepping into harm’s way just to board or leave a bus.’Sarah Gayton, of the National Federation of the Blind UK, also commented: ‘All types of floating bus stops are not safe or accessible for blind people, as well as all bus passengers.‘Guidance will not resolve this design flaw. The only solution is for the bus to pull up to the pavement curb where passengers can board and alight without crossing any cycle lane.‘We want cyclists to be safe, but not at the expense of the most vulnerable people; pedestrians, but particularly blind and disabled pedestrians.’Cue the mouth breathing minority here claiming that all cyclists are perfect and never endanger anyone!

Simon Hayes ● 11d21 Comments

It's one for Private Eye as it's so insane Signages that implies that if you are on a cycle heading uphill, you must cross the flow of traffic, ride onto the pavement through a bus stop, negotiating a traffic light column ( which is installed out of true) than a bin lamp post and a pole with a sign for cyclist to rejoin carriageway!So again crosssing two flows of traffic.As for Bus users, if you stand near the new kerbside to hail a bus or simply waiting as one does, you stand a good chance of a whack in the head from overhanging mirrors from large Vans or HGVs or indeed the bus as they now clip the kerb simply to avoid oncoming larger vehicles.How that is making things safer is beyond comprehension and there won't be a cyclist with half a brain who will be bothered to use it as there's no gain downhill and pointless uphill.What is evident already are scooters and e riders who now mount the pavement and ride at speed to circumvent the now blocked roads when two buses meet.It won't be long till someone cops it.But really? Thats responsible use of taxpayers money ? For nothing.  A bit like the claim of helping Climate Emergency by putting flower beds in Occupation Lane, a Hospital Access road which has walls both sides, is single lane and little light. Hence it's popularity with all the less savoury of this district. Utter nonsense.  Wasting peoples hard earned cash when there's so much basic stuff like sorting out uneven pavements and crappy road surfaces which really would make cycling a good bit easier and safer.

Raymond Havelock ● 3d

There have been quite a few incidents in Chiswick including a woman on a very expensive bike child carrier who laughed through a funeral entourage outside Chiswick Catholic Church 3 years ago. I witnessed that and have to say it was not accidental but sheer arrogance. But the stop just along near the old police station is lethal if you have anyone of a lesser disposition in your charge or if you have mobility or visual issues.  And for obvious reasons a lot of Bus users do. It is their only means of safe travelling independence.Massive amounts have been spent, some successful and some not to enable" the ' emancipation of the disabled" Ken Livingstone words not mine. But in fact some of those improvements made it easier for those who are not deemed disabled but less able. Something that inflicts most of us later rather than sooner.The 'Bus Islands' or 'Enhanced bus stops' as TfL have misleadingly renamed them, are fine if deployed in the environment that they are burned from. Former Tram or Trolleybus routes in European cities where there are wide straight boulevards.  Even then some are far from safe.Here, TfL have simply stuffed up a design and been nothing short of arrogant about it. Being quick to silence, ignore or freeze out critics. Even large charities for Age and disability. Being unwilling to refine and get some aspects right.The risk of getting hit in the head by HGV or Bus Mirrors ar a stop or getting hit by cyclists who whatever the signs say ride either way or straight through rather than round is constant. I suggest to anyone who smirks or scoffs at that experience to go volunteer and take someone with early dementia or a visual disability out shopping in Hammersmith Chiswick or Brentford by bus.What is supposed to be a feel good or assured trip ( for both volunteer and person ) has become in recent years a highly stressful experience.  Rather like being left with a relatives toddler in a room full of glass tables and sharp edges and a over exuberant pet dog.It's simply badly designed and the 'Enhanced Bus stops in Brentford from Ealing Road to Kew are probably the worst.I have to say I still ride on the road, even as a Cyclist I feel far safer. I note that quite a few others do the same and then there are those who do not respect pedestrians or anyone else and ride on the wrong side, at speed and without due care.  It's not just a problem from one source it from all means. 'A' and main 'B' Roads narrowed to a width that is too acute for current HGV and Bus Sizes. Meaning vehicles are now too close to the kerbs. From cyclist point of view, what idiot specified razor sharp kerbstones Amy of which are higher than pedal height which means you can Catch a pedal on a kerb if intimidated by a throw of passing cyclists riding at speed. A lot of money spent and a pretty poor end product which has made things more dangerous for just about everyone.Maybe now TfL and others will listen and be properly pragmatic and end computer modelling at junior level and solve the problems properly.

Raymond Havelock ● 10d