Forum Topic

A novel thought- Should Councils vet for terrorist connections B4 providing houses, etc willy nilly?

I'm sure The Lefties will come up with reasons why not, probably the standard, idiotic "It's agaiinst their Rights!"......

Rosco White ● 147d3 Comments

These Boroughs that have declared ( without any consultation or mandate ) a 'Borough of Sanctuary' have also created a burden for all tax paying residents.The astronomic cost of this is near to breaking some neighbouring Boroughs and damaging this one.Surely this entire Nation is A Nation of Sanctuary?  It's been the policy National Governments for a very long time.So should it not be the State that picks up the costs and not the localised districts many of whom are areas that already have costly difficulties ?It seems perverse to place the burden onto some and not all, and reckless for some Councils to create additional problems on their boroughs just to suit virtue signalling and feel good.

Raymond Havelock ● 144d

Surely they should have been  vetted long before they were even considered for a property.We need to deal with those here waiting already.Small boats jeopardise UK security, no one knows who, or how many are here.

Peter Yale ● 147d

No, because that sancitimouous moralistic thing called Councillor Polly Knewstub had decried that Ealing is a borough of santuary (Ealing Council 13/06/2023). This seems to imply that there will be no critical case by case thinking/evaluation. So long as the that sanctimuous moralists jodsworths are happy. They are usually in the Labour Party.

Anthony Hawran ● 147d