Forum Topic

The appointment of Tony Clements as Chief Executive of LBE in 2022 was ‘interesting’, to say the least.He was previously employed as Head of Place at the council between 207 and 2020. He left in mysterious circumstances with a £74,000 payoff for ‘loss of office’ (which isn’t really a reason for any payout). That should have precluded him from applying for the top job when previous incumbent Paul Nasjarek suddenly resigned in 2022. But it didn’t.He’s Peter Mason’s pal. The two worked closely together when Mason had he cabinet portfolio for planning in the borough, even enjoying trips to MIPIPM in Cannes together. So no great shock that Mason would want his mate back to oversee his strategy for transforming Ealing into some sort of dystopian hell.When Clements took office (on a starting salary of £192,000 plus a generous pension package) a raft of resignations from senior executive directors happened almost immediately. The word is that Clements was difficult to work with, hence his departure in 2020, and as the new head honcho he wanted his own lackeys in place. He also oversaw the restructuring that increase the number of directorates at the council (and the consequent inflated salaries to go with them).There’s no scrutiny of council officers, at any level, until the ombudsman gets involved. Little wonder that things don’t get done. For instance the failure to produce Authority Monitoring Reports for five years, despite there being a legal requirement to do so. These provide updates on housing figures every year and are used to ensure that overdevelopment won’t happen. Of course, it was helpful for developers who could appeal against planning refusals, as happened with the ones by West Ealing station now going ahead. No explanation has been forthcoming from the council about the failure to produce these reports. Even Cllr Shital Manro refused to explain, despite numerous requests on this forum and elsewhere.Incompetence? Laziness? Corruption? Draw your own conclusions. These are all rife in other local authorities, so why would Ealing be any different?

Simon Hayes ● 97d

There's a name that has a history - the disgraceful treatment of the coffee hut business in Walpole Park and the disastrous subsequent appointment of  'preferred' candidates for that and the restaurant were all overseen and a trail of links all involved the same characters - all linked.How on earth can a Council Officer - a Public Servant. have a second position that has a direct conflict of interest?They are supposed to be impartial and not have connections. But far too many do.Who remembers the rewards for a certain Executive of Regeneration in Two Boroughs whose only achievement was closing ranks within and spewing De-generation.?These people who are always the same names and on a Merry- Go-Round of top local authority positions all evade the public they serve but are always at the events held by Developers and Architectural and consultant junkets not to mention Cannes where 'done deals' are brokered behind closed doors and at events where the only media coverage is tightly controlled with copy and even picture control and trade media 100% dependent on feeding of these so everything is controlled.Its high time all Senior officers and managers declare connections and interests that pose a risk to themselves being corrupted or manipulated.And it should be published so those who are not online or expert in detective work can access information just be asking in a library for example.It absolutely stinks. Clearly someone withing tipped of a developer and associated consultants.Clearly this was privy others elected , or even instigated.A lot of connections and uncanny that the same names and companies crop up.Not just felling trees - possible to justify future land release and/or alternative use  but also to push through desires of developers with inappropriate designs that nullify any future protection and open the way for more extreme developments.What is going on in Lammas Park and around it are all inextricably linked.There needs to be a full open public enquiry as to just what is really going on, the ethical conduct , secret deals and more.

Raymond Havelock ● 97d