Forum Topic

If we look at the economics of roadspace dispassionately, it would be fair to say that streets having more than half their space taken up by parked cars is not an economic use of space.Many journeys in a car are taken by one person, yet that person takes up a disproportionate amount of road space. When they finish their journey, they continue to take up the same amount of space.If you look at the most popular and regularly used cycelways you will see that the busiest ones are those which are connected to others, and get people to their destinations in the most economical way possible. In order to populate more cycleways, these have to be connected and designed with the economics of getting people safely and directly between the places they need to go.Bike hangars are a good example of economising roadspace. 6 people can store their vehicles in the space it would take to park one car. Yet some people become apoplectic and percieve it as a ‘waste of space’.If I can use the road between Kew Bridge and Richmond as an example. I have driven the route and cycled it. The cycleway is clear and safe. But if it was removed, there is would not be enough space for another car lane. It would be given over to the odd car parking space. Do we want to give the option of travelling along that road by various means? Or do we want to give the space back entirely to motor vehicles, whether they are moving or not? Which would be more economically sustainable?The end goal isn’t to have roads saturated with traffic, but to have streets which appear empty because everyone is moving freely by the quickest and easiest means available.My generation has been sold the dream that owning a car is best for the individual and best for the economy. This, I’m afraid, is not true, and not sustainable. It is something many of the younger generation in London have come to realise. Look at any car advert and you see only one car on the road. That is far from reality. Would you agree with me that if we all drove, we would not in fact have the ‘freedom of the road’ we were promised, but we’d each be stuck behind the car in front?

Dominik Klimowski ● 139d

There are plenty of roads without cycle lanes, as mentioned. Some are ok, some are less safe, and some don't allow much space, mainly due to cars parked either side. With the latter it's a case of cycling in front of cars, but then many get impatient or start beeping, or worse cars coming the other way will drive straight at me assuming I'll somehow evaporate. Not much can be done with streets like that, but the attitude of many (not all) drivers makes cycling stressful and dangerous. An alternative safe cycle lane would counter that problem.One part of my route is Kensington High Street. What's frustrating is there used to be a cycleway here (part of the east/west route) but it was ripped out. Now there is a conspicuous gap, where cyclists use the cycleway until Kensington High Street, where it becomes a free-for-all. This is what you'd describe as sharing the road with other users. It wouldn't be so bad save for the fact that where the cycleway used to be now has a car or van parked every 50meters, so that cyclists have to constantly weave in and out of traffic. Once we get to Olympia, the cycleway returns, and everyone can breathe sigh of relief. Traffic continues to move, as now there is a cycle lane in the place of parked cars.You are assuming that my motives are solely for my own benefit. I am an experienced cyclist, but many are not (people are not born with cycling experience). I see a wide demographic using the C9, from children, families, elderly, and the odd mobility scooter. You express indignation at the low number of people cycling, but the best way to get more people to cycle is to create safe roads for them to do so. I won't be around in years to come, but I would like roads to improve so that cycling becomes a more desirable travel option for future generations, thus freeing up road space for all. Some of the routes I mentioned would terrify me as a child or novice cyclist. Everyone has the right to travel, and driving is not an option for many, so it is only fair that everyone has an equal opportunity to do so safely and without fear.

Dominik Klimowski ● 139d