Forum Topic

Lammas Park Why all the misleading and Deception?

New posters have appeared in Lammas Park.  They still do not explain in any detail the rationale for the failed works.They still do not have a single name of anyone in charge.The pictures though are hugely misleading.They show " Flooding in and Ealing Street"The pictures are actually the flooding in and around two 'Speed tables" in Church Lane/ Culmington Road.In actuality the cause of the flooding dates back to the installation some years ago of the traffic calming speed tables - which serve their purpose.But the construction of these blocked the fall of rainwater to the drains and caused problems from day one.The road rises slightly after the Junctions of Elers Road and Lammas Park Gardens and the rainfall cannot soak away as the Drains are the wrong side.This has worsened because of two other factors. 1.The drains have not been routinely descaled for decades ( They used to be done every 10 years by a local company based in Derwent Yard ). I know this for sure as it was one of my first student summer jobs ) Simple rudimentary stuff but highly effective.2. The huge trees produce a lot of leaves which are not dealt with and full the galleys and rot and again block water flow and drains up.  This is a problem locally around the parks.The roots have disturbed the level flows of the gullies. Again something that form time to time is easily remedied.Does it really take huge earthworks to remedy a lack of basic urban maintenance?Why use misleading pictures with the very cause in the pictures? Water unable to reach the drainsThe third Picture shows a flooded western end of the park.  This was in winter and after a very long dry period.  A very heavy rainstorm caused this and it was no more than water logged - just like a level playing field.  It took longer to drain away as it was much colder in that period.Theres used to be a slightly boggy area no more than a few metres in diameter near there that was down to a leak from an inspection chamber.Fact is Lammas Park has had minimal maintenance since the 1960s. Always the poor relation to Walpole Park which was looked after really well. Lammas Park has lost a lot of it's once equally good amenities to free and open access to all, but it at least remained a very safe park for children to play in,  be it sport or the swings or the long gone adventure playground.That is no longer even a consideration. Boggy Water and Playground? Irritant fauna and biting insects?  Why do you think Victorian Parks were created? Especially when surrounded by open meadows?  Because they were made to be safe and healthy places.With this bird brained scheme which has no evidence of proper risk or impact assessments is frankly, shameful and those behind it ought to be made accountable.But putting pictures with misleading captions is stooping to the level of regimes that this nation fought to quell. Tell the truth. And explain everything properly.  And produce the independent risk assessments.

Raymond Havelock ● 192d14 Comments

Ben, you are just dim. Sorry if you don’t like plain speaking, but frankly if you talk nonsense it deserves short shrift.As for council bashing, well plenty of other people criticise the council, and rightly so. It has consistently shown itself to be self-serving and incompetent.An example for you, and I’ll use easy to understand language to help you.For 12 years Ealing Labour said there’s no money owing to government funding cuts. We saw services chopped and the blame laid squarely at the for if the coalition and then Conservative governments.In May 2022 Labour increased its number of councillors in Ealing, largely as a result of a negative campaign against the national government rather than any achievement managed under Julian Bell or Peter Mason.What was the very first motion passed by the new council? To increase councillor allowances, amounting to an increase of a million pounds over four years. Suddenly no mention of cuts or lack of funding! Now that is self-serving.The list of lies, failures and brass-necked cronyism is lengthy. Take your pick from the Ealing Town Hall saga, the ‘no more tall towers’ pre-election pledge by Mason (handily forgotten), failure to produce legally required Authority Monitoring Reports for five years (gifting planning appeals to developers at taxpayers expense), the Lammas Park earthworks, Gurnell, etc, etc. Years and years of the stuff, all recorded on this site but not widely disseminated to the population because there’s no effective local media, just the taxpayer funded Around Ealing propaganda sheet.Arthur mentions consultations. He knows a lot about that subject, as do I, and the flagrant disregard for the legal requirements on the part of the council is breathtaking. You probably don’t care or don’t understand. That’s your choice, but other people still feel the duty to highlight such matters.Labour now has nobody to blame at national level. Already making themselves unpopular there and you notice how the local left have gone very quiet over issues such as child benefit caps, winter fuel allowance and national insurance hikes, things that will impact a lot of people negatively in Ealing in the not too distant future. That will take some explaining in 18 months when the next local elections are due.Standing as an independent is pointless in most places in England. Eric Leach, who is an excellent community representative for West Ealing, tried and failed and that underlined how unengaged many are with local issues - until they are directly affected by them.Which brings us to LTNs. The opposition to those was huge. 3,500 attendees at two marches. Maybe you missed it, but the facts are the facts. They took the roadblocks out and Bell lost his job. You can’t rewrite the narrative now.You seem to think you speak for some silent majority, but you really don’t.Oh, and Philippa is boring. Really tedious. That’s an opinion and you can lump it.

Simon Hayes ● 192d