Forum Topic

The increased questioning of the integrity of postal voting, without any evidence being presented that there are any significant problems, seems to have its origins in the Trump campaign's activity in Georgia. They have repeatedly made claims about postal voter fraud, particularly among the black community there, on a scale to have an impact on results. These claims have been investigated time and time again, including by Republican elected officials in the state, and found to be totally baseless. What has happened is that the Russians appear to be continuing to push the claims hard through their disinformation network and generalising them so that postal voting is being smeared in every democracy and, what concerned nobody previously, becomes amplified by useful idiocy on social media. This thread provides a good example of how a falsehood, if repeated often enough and appealing to a person's existing prejudices, can be accepted as an absolute fact by some. We may be at the foothills of this attempt to chip away at confidence in the democratic process. A Trump win in the American election which would probably be followed by a Russian victory in the war in Ukraine and an increase in confidence among those states hostile to our way of life. With most western government's struggling with slow economic growth and huge debt burdens, democratically elected government's will probably have to deliver lots of bad news and this looks set to be a very difficult period for us all.

Gordon Southwell ● 346d

The Electoral Commission has a reputation for high standards so you are right to say they are known for being accurate and correct and therefore we should trust their conclusion that voter fraud is not significant and that the machinery of our democracy is sound. Data on voting methods is ultimately put into the public domain on a ward level so it would be very easy to identify fraud if it was 'rife'. You don't explain why you think postal voting is particular vulnerable to fraud but that could be because you have never  gone through the process. When you apply there is a registration check which verifies the details against the electoral register and cross checks the signature you gave when you registered to vote. Any doubts about the authenticity means the application will be rejected even if it is just a minor discrepancy in the details provided. Each postal vote is issued with a unique identifier, making it easier to track and verify votes. In some instances, the voter's signature on the security statement must be witnessed by another person, adding an extra layer of verification. Upon receipt, postal votes are checked for the correct details and any irregularities. Votes with mismatched information or missing elements are not counted. Election officials receive training to recognize and handle suspicious activities and potential fraud.Of course the system doesn't totally preclude the chances of fraud but neither does in person voting, however a lot of effort would go into fraudulently casting a single vote and doing it on a large scale would be close to impossible.Questioning the integrity of our democratic processes without any actual evidence is profoundly unpatriotic as you are pushing a line of argument that Putin and his shills are currently trying to get people to believe. Check your facts before parroting what the enemies of this country are telling you.

Mark Evans ● 347d