Forum Topic

Councillor Shital Manro, if people in power are disingenuous, and stonewall the people who elected them, this will engender rudeness and frustration from the people towards those in power.The case of the Manor Road death trap tower development is an example of this. Nearly 3000 people objected to this development. There was a last minute few/a handful of supporter sychophants for the death trap tower development. However,  the developers won an appeal (October 2021) to overturn the Planning Committee's original decision (October 2020) to reject the development. You, Shital Manro, voted for the Manor Road death trap tower. The planning inspector highlighted the incompetance of the Labour run Ealing Council, of which you are a member. Your council administration had failed to publish housing figures which would have shown this death trap tower development was unnecessary.At risk of being idiosyncratic, when you attended a Stop the Towers meeting at Drayton Green Primary School (September 2019), you seemed like an officious stonewalling overlord to the people who had gathered. That does not help in making people engaged in wanting to be involved in politics. It encourages hostility towards politicians.Endearing youself to developers seems to be more important than serving the people. Getting rid of Planning Notification Letters is another example of this. These are examples of why democracy declines and leads to overlod feudalism, because the people feel excluded and frustrated.

Anthony Hawran ● 1267d

Cllr Manro, you are being disingenuous. The question wasn’t where is the report. The question was why were no reports produced for several years, despite it being a statutory duty of the council to do so? As a result developers, particularly Southern Grove, are able to challenge planning decisions that go against them. You will know this, of course, having chaired the planning committee for a number of years.Can you explain the failure to produce the reports? Even the latest one is out of date now.Here’s some guidance to refresh your memory:‘Local plans are prepared by local planning authorities. They create the framework for the future development of an area and are the starting-point for considering whether planning applications should be approved.Local development schemes (LDS) set out the programme for preparing the development plan documents (DPD) that will make up the local plan.The Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004 introduced a requirement for local planning authorities to make an annual report to the Secretary of State about the implementation of the local development scheme and the extent to which the policies set out in the local plan were being achieved. This was referred to as an Annual Monitoring Report, which had to be published as a single document on a specific date.However, section 113 of the Localism Act 2011 amended this requirement, renaming the report the Authority Monitoring Report (AMR), allowing it to be published annually rather than on a specific date, and removing the requirement for it to be a single report. This gives local authorities the flexibility to publish a number of component documents when information becomes available, which together make up the AMR. The authority must make these reports available to the public.The minimum information an AMR should contain is defined in Regulation 34 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012. It should:Set out progress with local plan preparation.Report on activities relating to the duty to cooperate.Describe how the implementation of policies in the local plan is progressing.It may also provide information about the implementation of any neighbourhood plans, and whether there is a need to undertake a partial or full review of the local plan, and may highlight how contributions made by development have been used, such as planning obligations, the community infrastructure levy and new homes bonus payments.NB the National Infrastructure Commission also publishes an Annual Monitoring Report, setting out its views on the government’s progress over the past year in delivering infrastructure.’

Simon Hayes ● 1271d

Once again the facts don’t match what you say as usual this is a reply from the council to residents . Thank you for raising this issue, and the deeply frustrating impact that this is having on users of West Ealing station. I know that Network Rail’s contractors have been working hard overnight to resolve the issue of the potentially dangerous wall and that this is taking them longer to resolve than they originally hoped, but that everything is being done to get the station fully re-opened as swiftly as possible. I’m now in a position to provide the following information: Dangerous Wall at alongside West Ealing station / Unauthorised Demolition, Manor Road We have now had an opportunity to properly investigate this matter. It is now clear that there are two separate issues: firstly concerns about an unsafe wall alongside the station and secondly an unauthorised start on site at Manor Road. Taking each in turn we can confirm the following; The Station WallThis wall is outside the Manor Road development site and is understood to be in the ownership of Network Rail. Network Rail has been monitoring this wall’s stability for several years. The construction team from the Manor Road development site – Henry Construction – raised concerns about the wall yesterday morning and notified Network Rail. Network Rail then condemned the wall and closed the station. Network Rail contracted Balfour Beatty to erect scaffolding last night, we understand this was completed by about 1:30am. Work is underway to take down the wall and this is being progressed as swiftly as possible to enable the station to re-open. Manor Road Development SiteThe part of the Manor Road scheme that has commenced is the development of the social housing being delivered by Metropolitan Thames Valley Housing Association (MTVH). Planning conditions imposed on the planning permission require the submission of construction management plans, amongst other matters, prior to commencement. The Council has not received any discharge of conditions applications to date, so this is clearly an unauthorised, premature start to the works. MTVH’s contractors Henry Construction have been working on site at Manor Road. Staff from the Council’s Building Control service visited the site on Wednesday and Thursday and can confirm that the contractors have, in their view, commenced demolition without the required approvals. The site owners have now been notified and warned that a Temporary Stop Notice would be issued. It is understood that Henry Construction have now stopped work on site. To date, the Council has not received any discharge of conditions applications for the Manor Road site, and whilst they have been requested, it is unclear when they will be submitted. MTVH accept that Henry Construction have overstepped the mark and are keen to rectify the situation and allay local people’s concerns. The council will continue to liaise with MTVH over this breach and have made it clear that we expect the planning conditions to be discharged in full and to our satisfaction before work can recommence.

Mr Shital Manro ● 1271d