Forum Topic

Yet another Pitshanger Lane planning application

I noticed in several shop windows yesterday in the Lane a sign asking for objections to be submitted to yet another chancers planning application. From memory it was number 150 which I think is the chemists on the corner of Queens Walk which looks different from the other shops on that side of the street. The proposal is to add another 5 flats up on top there somehow. I've just tried to look it up on the council website but there's no access to the planning section for some reason!

peter king ● 1365d5 Comments

Thank you Fred, I tried to remember the whole number. If you are against the development, I think the window closes tomorrow

peter king ● 1357d

216608FUL  Redevelopment comprising a three storey rear extension;

Fred Hunt ● 1357d

I have just tried to find the reference number listed on many small posters in the shops in Pitshanger Lane who clearly don't want anymore speculative development to ruin the look of the shops and the flats above them. Ref no.216608 FUY apparently refers to a 2006 application for two smoke extractors. Someone isn't telling the truth here

peter king ● 1357d

well when i took Ealing to county court for ignoring me for 6 years the judge awarded vthem £1600 fact is that MASON a LFI activist  is not open, not inclusive and not transparent

P Taylor ● 1357d

Peter Mason, when he become Ealing Council Leader, said on Tuesday 18th May 2021 that, "I will lead an open, inclusive and transparent council, that engages local people in the challenges we face" (source: Ealing Today 20/05/2021).Yet Ealing Council cannot seem to maintain access to their Planning Portal. Over the last three days the "Search for a planning application" has not been accessible/available. Are Ealing Council making it deliberately harder for people to comment on planning applications? Therefore, they are not really being open, inclusive and transparent. They abolished notifying people affected by planning applications with a Planning Notification Letter, six and half years ago. They, it seems, are not really serving the public. Endearing themselves to developers at the expense of the people seems to be their underlying trait/characteristic.

Anthony Hawran ● 1365d