Forum Topic

If you have every worked for any large organisation you will probably have come across similar cases it isn't unique to TfL. While some of the criticisms made are valid that isn't the whole picture. TfL has had a number of successes over the years including the takeover and upgrade of London Overground and the implementation of Oyster/contactless. They also did a great deal to get their finances in a strong position before the pandemic which is a key reason they have managed to survive a collapse in their revenue and an unwillingness of government to cover resulting losses. Even if you were to assume that TfL has no redeeming features, it makes no sense to me for any London resident to argue that they should not receive proper financing from the government. If TfL was really as bad as people are suggesting then the Department for Transport could use its control of the purse strings to demand reform. The reality is that, other than forcing TfL to introduce some unpalatable increases in fares, charges and reductions in services, the government are not requiring any structural changes at TfL. The only outcome I can foresee here is that Londoners are going to get a really raw deal in any settlement that is reached and that is because our votes don't matter that much to the current government. Policy driven by short term political advantage is never going to bring about a positive outcome and the real danger is that this government sends London into a spiral of decline as a city. None of us should be cheerleading for that.


Gordon Southwell ● 1388d

Although I'm not going to argue that in some cases public sector pay is excessive a £12million bonus pot for an organisation the size and complexity of  TfL isn't necessarily excessive. It's a very small part of its overall budget. This would include key staff such as engineers, accountants, lawyers and IT professionals who are essential to the network and need to be incentivised to stay when they are likely to be getting offers to move. If you can provide some specific examples of misuse of bonus payments at TfL that demonstrate profligacy I'd be interested but for the time being it is more important to focus on the bigger picture. TfL had seen a substantial improvement in its financial position before the pandemic comparing the situation to when Boris Johnson left. All city transport networks in Europe are subsidised by governments and, per passenger, London gets the smallest amount of any major population area. Our fares are the highest already. The notion, therefore that somehow TfL has the ability to maintain services and keep fares affordable without government support is delusional. These regular negotiations in which the government takes it to the bring every time are just ways to squeeze more money out of Londoners by forcing TfL to introduce more charges and take away more travel benefits than they would be inclined to. With the north and Midlands up in arms about betrayal despite the fact that £96 billion is about to be spent on them, it plays very well in constituencies that the government is seeking to keep that tube and bus services are being cut and so that is what we may need to brace ourselves for.


Gordon Southwell ● 1391d