Forum Topic

Tory Wipe Out in Ealing on 3rd May

Having made a throw away comment in another thread about the Conservatives losing all their seats in Ealing borough in the local elections I thought I'd take a closer look just to see if it was a real possibility. Having done so I have to say that it is and that the Conservatives will certainly have a low single figure number of councillors and maybe even a big fat zero. Amazing to think that within the last decade they controlled the Council. I'm not saying that this is a good thing - in fact Council's overly dominated by one party don't tend to be particularly well run. Some very good and diligent councillors look set to lose their seats.On a ward by ward basis if you take Cleveland, Ealing Common and Northfield ward the national and London-wide swing against the party makes it very unlikely they will hold onto any of the seats there as their margin is small. One exception might be David Millican's seat in Northfield where is high personal vote combined with three opposition parties all thinking they have a chance might allow him to hang on.The two Tory 'safe' wards of Hanger Hill and Ealing Broadway present a real problem for them. They had the second and fourth highest percentage votes in the borough for Remain both over 70% In addition they have an extremely high proportion of EU citizens from other countries - 19.3% and 18.0% respectively as of the 2011 census. EU citizens can vote and the number resident will have gone up substantially over the last seven years. If they hang on in these wards it will be because the opposition vote is split three ways.

Andy Jones ● 2848d45 Comments

I did the same searches and came up with the same results so it looks like I may owe Scott an apology. I have a distinct memory of reading that he was a Seventh Day Adventist but my powers of recollection are not what they used to be.In the broader view it makes little difference. Although there are aspects of the Mormon religion that appear slightly wacky, the adherents of neither sect appear to be bad people.  As practiced here in the UK, their social conservatism is no different to what was mainstream twenty years ago. To equate them as a stepping stone to Wahhabism as Scott does is just silly and sixth form debate club logic.He is also obviously desperate for us to ask about his repeated 'coke and hookers' references from Private Eye. I never heard anyone else suggest that Julian Bell has anything other than a blameless personal life and as two decade long subscriber to Private Eye, there has never been any suggestion to the contrary in that publication.Once again this could be something from Scott's fevered imagination but perhaps he is making a link with coverage of the MIPIM conference which Julian Bell has attended over the years. Like most large business conferences there will be trade for prostitutes and drug dealers from business people freed from the constraints of being at home but you can't equate proximity with participation. It would be a bit like saying Scott Jones of Ealing is a necrophiliac if he lived near to an undertakers.Scott obviously has a lot of hate in his heart for Julian Bell. He would be a more effective foe if he focused on the issues raised by Peter but lazy parallels and false innuendo require much less thought, knowledge and effort.

Andy Jones ● 2841d