Forum Topic

"They claim that during the recent election that it was the old familiar faces who knocked on doors and did the work to get the vote out during the general election"That certainly wasn't the case in Ealing Central and Acton, where we had huge numbers of new members, together with helpers sent from other parts of London, going from door to door to get out the vote for the Labour Party and our candidate Rupa Huq.  It was such a successful campaign that we increased her majority from a slender 274 to over 13,000.And I don't think the huge number of new Labour members are being or need to be 'controlled' by Momentum, when they're genuinely inspired and enthused by the new direction the party is moving in. I think your local councillor's fear that not enough 'new people' will put themselves forward is misplaced. In Ealing many new potential candidates did put themselves forward, somewhat to the consternation of the 'old guard' drawing up the shortlists. Their real fear is the opposite - that there are too many 'new people' putting themselves forward, just as there are too many new members with different political views.  Of course a lot of local issues are regarded as 'non-political', but many aren't. The tragic fire in a tower block not far from here is being revealed as ideological neglect of the poor and vulnerable based on local party political decision making. In Haringey, a Labour council is selling off public assets and displacing many of its most needy residents. Even local developments in Ealing raise political issues, such as privatising public space and social cleansing through large scale regeneration schemes, and privatising public services through outsourcing, which might actually be behind that 90% of your councillor's post bag.

Peter Evans ● 2699d

The problem for Momentum locally is that being a Councillor isn't really about taking any political stance - it is more about providing a link between the public and the Council primarily to make sure their problems are dealt with. I was chatting somebody who is a Councillor recently in another borough and she said her post bag is 90% Council tenants having maintenance issues, problems with refuse collection and issues with parking enforcement and CPZs. I can't imagine Ealing is any different.There seems to be a degree of scepticism among the 'red Tory Blairite scum' who have served conscientiously as Councillors that there are many people among the new surge of membership who would be sufficiently interested in the job to do it properly. They claim that during the recent election that it was the old familiar faces who knocked on doors and did the work to get the vote out during the general election - as the three local candidates where avowedly non-Corbynite the support from that section of the party was allegedly a bit lukewarm.What concerns them is that a relatively small number of people in Momentum can control a large number of votes through calls to action through Facebook. This allows them to corral enough people to win virtually any vote at the local level except in areas with a significant proportion of ethnic minority members. The vote of longer serving members who have done their time, volunteered for the party and been loyal through thick and thin counts equally with that of someone who was a member of a rival party only a few months before.Of course this is the system Labour has chosen for themselves so anyone who is unhappy with it only has themselves to blame. The problem for the Ealing electorate is that if Councillors are selected on the basis of their adherence to the tenets of the national leadership rather than any demonstrable record of public service it may become harder to find a Councillor who is prepared to help.

Andy Jones ● 2700d

Ealing Labour Group started off the process of selecting council candidates over a year ago.  Ultimately, the final selection is made by the local party membership in each ward, which has increased substantially over the past couple of years and include a significant number who support Jeremy Corbyn and the recent Labour Party manifesto.  These members also sense that many of our local Labour Councillors are not so supportive of these policies nor of the present leadership, and there is an understandable determination among many members to change the political flavour of our Labour Council to more closely align with the policies of the Party nationally. So while the selection process in Ealing hasn't been as dramatic as in Haringey, there has been a fairly drawn out contest between the more traditional sitting councillors and new applicants with more left wing views.  However, while the wider local membership might have the final say, the initial candidate selection and approval was done by various remote sub-committees of more established party members, which some members feel has limited the candidates being put before them to those with more traditional views.  In addition, the Ealing Labour Group chose to start the official process off such a long time ago that, under the present rules, only members who joined before April 2016 can actually vote at the final selection meetings.  This, of course, excludes many new and enthusiastic members and could again produce an unrepresentative result. So, depending on one's political viewpoint, the whole thing has been an entirely proper democratic process or a total stitch up!

Peter Evans ● 2700d

There was an article in the Standard earlier this week which focused on Haringey where there is a full blown attempt to oust sitting Labour candidates in favour of Momentum/Corbynite replacements. Haringey may be a bit of a special case as Jeremy used to be a councillor there and has sent shadow cabinet ministers to speak against current councillors. There is also a very large scale housing development which has been characterised as social cleansing by Momentum but which will deliver 5,000 new homes.Ealing was mentioned in the article but only in passing. A friend who is quite active locally in Labour says that it is very unlikely that any sort of left wing coup could take place. The borough had quite a large and active membership before the Corbyn £3 member surge took place. Southall Labour party has the largest member base in the country and is not pro-Corbyn. The Councillors voted in favour of the most right wing candidate in the leadership election and there isn't really a rival candidate on the left to take over from Julian Bell. A high number of sitting councillors will defend their seats in 2018 so change is unlikely.Given the financial constraints on local authorities taking over the Council would be a poison chalice because whoever is running the show will have to make cuts which would be very embarrassing for people who define themselves as anti-austerity. It isn't really worth the bother for Momentum to have a crack at taking over Ealing.Apparently a similar story with the MPs. Virendra Sharma and Steve Pound enjoy strong support in their local party and, although Rupa Huq isn't as well established she is untouchable as a female Muslim MP who brought in such a huge majority at the last election.Ealing local politics seems set to remain a bit dull.

Andy Jones ● 2701d