Forum Topic

Whatever the limitations of the current newspaper owners it has to be admitted that nobody is really doing a great deal better across the country. The problem seems to me less management and more a general collapse in traditional revenues. There is a danger in harking back to a period when things were undoubtedly much better and saying that it has all gone to pot. The chances are that if you took the combined readership of this web site and Get West London you would find that it is greater than the Ealing Gazette in its pomp. The expectation of free content means that the resources devoted to editorial are a fraction of what they were but enough stories are published to keep people interested. I can only speak for Acton but awareness of the site seems more or less universal and that one is published less frequently and has a lower distribution than this one with 6,000 getting this site's newsletter. Get West London probably has a comparable readership. Obviously it is an apples and pears comparison because people are digesting news in bite size chunks rather than in one sitting by reading a newspaper but you can make an argument that more people than ever are reading local news in the area.Whilst the breadth and quality might not be at the level it used to be local media still does a reasonable job of keeping people informed who want to be about the key things that are going on.I agree that the main thing that people can do to improve the Gazette is pick up a copy and read it. I have urged people to do this in the past. However, this is hard to achieve if no copies are stocked locally.

Andy Jones ● 3149d

A good Local Newspaper has to be independent. Completely independent from manipulation and dictates of advertisers.For most of it's existence, the Ealing Gazette and it's sister titles were exactly that. Editorial was free to report, expose and highlight whatever went on in it's patch, good, bad, Murky or bright.Sadly changes of ownership and total reliance on advertising and revenue from local authorities have brought the editorial content to nothing more than a legal obligation for a registered newspaper.To be fair, whilst the recent brace of owners of the Gazette and it's sisters have destroyed the papers further than they ought, most damage has come from the public at large.They simply don't read local papers and barely read any newspapers.It's only when they are gone that things start to be noticed.Much has migrated to the internet, but the problem with the web and an increasing one at that, is people only read what they want to read and are fed what cookies and data says they ought to read.Worse still is the totally unreliable sources of information and poorly researched material which makes the internet far less than it should and ought to be.In my view a strong independent local paper is still a key part of a democratic free society and it's diminished presence contributes to the many liberties taken by those in power who see opportunities in the lack of any sort of watchdog and a lack of a single cohesive communication to the local people.This website is an example.  The forum contributors are more or less the same small number of people, the editorial limited and as mentioned Get West London a really messy and difficult site good for sport but lacking in editorial and journalistic prowess.A sad loss which can only be sorted by people picking up those Ealing Gazettes and supporting it.  I fear it's too late to turn it around as it won't suit the management.

Mark Kehoe ● 3149d

There isn't really an easy solution to this problem. A few months back I chatted to a local councillor about a planning application that I was considering objecting to. I put it to him that, because the notice about the application appeared in the Gazette and the paper wasn't available anywhere near the site, the Council had failed in its statutory duty to inform residents.I was told this would not be deemed as adequate grounds for refusal as people had tried this line of argument before and it had been rejected. The law doesn't specify any minimum amount of circulation and at the moment is being interpreted as if a paper exists at all it is good enough. Ealing is far from unique in having this issue as the problem is even worse throughout the UK. You could seek a judicial review on the grounds of inadequate consultation but there would be no guarantee of success - it would probably only be worth it for a larger development.The Council have no broader legal obligation to keep us informed just a series of specific responsibilities based on outdated legislation. For planning they get a fixed fee from developers so have every incentive to minimise costs. Ealing actually serves people relatively well compared to other boroughs - if you find a copy of the Gazette look at their notices against those from places like Kensington and Chelsea and Westminster which appear in ridiculously small fonts.The Council put pressure on Trinity Mirror to increase distribution and proper content for the Ealing Gazette but I doubt they will want to rock the boat as the company is an important supporter of the Labour party. Every election you will see a wraparound on the Gazette urging you to vote Labour. I was told this is actually a donation by the company valued at below the £5,000 that would make it individually notifiable. Trinity apparently do this across the country for Labour party candidates.This probably also helps on the editorial line of the paper. The Gazette isn't exactly overtly pro-Labour but does go quite softly on them particularly on controversial issues such as Julian Bell's housing situation. The current arrangement suits both sides and nobody is doing anything illegal so things aren't likely to change.

Andy Jones ● 3154d