Forum Topics

August smile

These are actual comments made by Georgia State Troopers that were taken off their car videos:1. "You know, stop lights don't come any redder than the one you just went through."2. "Relax, the handcuffs are tight because they're new. They'll stretch after you wear them a while."3. "If you take your hands off the car, I'll make your birth certificate a worthless document."4. "If you run, you'll only go to jail tired."5. "Can you run faster than 1200 feet per second? Because that's the speed of the bullet that will be chasing you."6. "You don't know how fast you were going? I guess that means I can write anything I want to on the ticket, huh?"7. "Yes, sir, you can talk to the shift supervisor, but I don't think it will help. Oh, did I mention that I'm the shift supervisor?"8. "Warning! You want a warning? O.K, I'm warning you not to do that again or I'll give you another ticket."9. "The answer to this last question will determine whether you are drunk or not. Was Mickey Mouse a cat or a dog?"10. "Fair? You want me to be fair? Listen, fair is a place where you go to ride on rides, eat cotton candy and corn dogs and step in monkey poop."11. "Yeah, we have a quota. Two more tickets and my wife gets a toaster oven."12. "In God we trust; all others we run through NCIC." ( National Crime Information Center )13. "Just how big were those 'two beers' you say you had?"14. "No sir, we don't have quotas anymore. We used to, but now we're allowed to write as many tickets as we can."15. "I'm glad to hear that the Chief (of Police) is a personal friend of yours. So you know someone who can post your bail."AND THE WINNER IS....16. "You didn't think we give pretty women tickets? You're right, we don't. Sign here."

Graham Weeks ● 3106d18 Comments ● 3072d

New hazard for Ealing motorists -  Avoid Springbridge Road MSCP

Be very wary of parking in the Council's Springbridge Road car park.  I got a parking ticket last week for parking in the new private car park the council has designated for the local NHS CCG inside the car park itself.  There are 20 poorly signed bays on the 5th floor for the exclusive use of the NHS CCG.  They park a row of shiny new BMWs and Mercs up there.  The blue floor treatment is exactly the same as the rest of the car park so it is not very obvious that this is a separate private car park.  The shiny new BMWs and Mercs carry no special badges so that offers no clue to the unwary.  My offence was "85 Parked without clearly displaying a valid permit where required".  Well as it happens none of the CCG vehicles were displaying any kind of permit either.  I paid for my ticket and went off into town.  It is how you use town centre car parks.  You do not expect to have to negotiate additional restrictions inside.  The day I got done I was one of 5 people with tickets in the same 20 space area.  The next day I popped back and another 2 cars had tickets.  Clearly this new feature of the car park is trappy.  And the parking people will surely know this from their stats.  It is pretty bent.  Town centre car parking is a rare commodity and I am not aware of the council doing any public consultation on whether the public should lose 20 spaces to one organisation.  Why can't the high panjandrums of the NHS CCG take their chances with parking like everyone else?  Anyway pay and display car parks are hazardous enough without introducing new traps inside them.  Avoid Springbridge Road MSCP.

Phil Taylor ● 3090d10 Comments ● 3083d

FIRE DANGER IN EALING HMOs?

It is not only tower blocks in Notting Hill where there is danger of fire.   There was a fire in a large  HMO in W3 a couple of weeks ago.  Not on the same scale as Grenfell Tower and no one died but with striking parallels:  Council failure to heed residents’ representations, Council tolerance of bad management, Council unaccountability and uncaring politicians ignoring warnings. Neighbours of the HMO in question discovered recently that a few years ago it was issued with a licence despite the fact it was badly managed, overcrowded, and lacked adequate fire-prevention and escape provision.  It stayed that way for four years. The Council’s Employee Code of Conduct defines as gross misconduct, deserving of immediate dismissal, “serious negligence that causes or might cause loss, damage or injury”.  What happened to the officer who irresponsibly licensed this HMO?  He was promoted.  He then reappointed the same HMO licence holder and manager, knowing their bad record. Of course he did.   That was his record too. Neighbours complained to senior officers, ward councillors and Council Leader Bell.   They were ignored.  The matter was put to MP Huq.  Ignored.  She was evidently more concerned with protecting Ealing Council from scrutiny than the safety of the lives of constituents.  Party before people! Neighbours made a formal complaint.  Council officers refused to accept it, suppressed it, covering up the scandal and protecting colleagues from investigation, and thereby corrupting the Council’s complaints procedure.The Council, far from learning from complaints, as it hypocritically claims to do, has endorsed the policy revealed here of banking licence fees and abandoning HMO residents to squalid and dangerous conditions. Anyone living in an HMO should insist that the property is thoroughly inspected immediately.  The production of a licence (as we have seen with the W3 HMO) guarantees nothing.   It is possible in Ealing for a property to be licensed and dangerous to live in.  Ask the landlord to see his licence.  The name of the responsible officer is on the first page.  Is it one of the officers involved in the W3 scandal?   Who is it?  Write to Julian Bell and ask him.  He knows the names. If it is found that the licensed HMO does not conform to legal requirements, Julian Bell should  be asked to explain how a license came to be granted and what action he intends to take against the council officer(s) responsible.   Ask him to assure you that your HMO has been adequately inspected.  Does it have an up-to-date gas-safety certificate on display?  Is the door to your part of the property a proper fire-door fitted with a seal around the edge? Is the building fitted with smoke-alarms and an adequate integrated fire-alarm system?  Is there emergency lighting on the stairs. Is there adequate escape-provision?  Particularly important if you live on an upper floor.All these things are required by law. Fire-fighters should not be obliged to risk their lives because council officers are indifferent to the safety of human lives and cover up for colleagues, and when our supposed “representatives”, Bell and Huq, are happy to turn a blind eye to anything that might embarrass their party.

vincent paul WRIGLEY ● 3134d0 Comments ● 3134d

Labour's Land Value Tax would be excruciating for London

On page 86 of its manifesto Labour raises the prospect of a Land Value Tax (LVT):A Labour government will give local government extra funding next year. We will initiate a review into reforming council tax and business rates and consider new options such as a land value tax, to ensure local government has sustainable funding for the long term.I did the calculation for my house.  My current council tax is £2,270.  Under Labour's LVT proposals this would go up to £5,890, a rise of £3,620 or 160%.  It would be excruciating for my family.  Finding £3,620 out of an already reduced after tax income would effectively mean the end of holidays or a move to a smaller property.  It is quite easy to do this calculation for yourself.  Get your property value off Zoopla.  Multiply by 0.55 to get an estimate of the value of the undeveloped land.  Multiply 0.0085 to get the tax you would pay.  The rate of 0.85% comes from proposers of the tax themselves.  It is no good Labour claiming that this is scaremongering.  They have raised the proposal and stated the rate.  We know it has to be a large amount because they themselves are presenting it as a get out of free jail card for local government finance. Here is a mechanism that will allow Labour to pump vast funds into its local government clients without affecting headline tax rates for regular people.  The 1%ers will pay!  Unfortunately that means anyone who has struggled to buy a property in London.  Good luck on Thursday!

Phil Taylor ● 3163d13 Comments ● 3140d

Code Club at Acton & Ealing Central Library

https://www.codeclub.org.uk/Code Club is a nationwide network of free volunteer-led after-school coding clubs for children aged 9-11.I am currently volunteering for 2 code clubs, one at Acton Library and other at Ealing Central Library.Currently we have few seats available for the children so if you're interested for your child to learn about coding, then please get in touch with the hosts below:Acton Library:Everyone Active Acton Centre, High St, London W3 6NEAwatif El-Martaoui elmartaouia@hotmail.comTime: Saturday 11-12 pmEaling Central Library:103 Ealing Broadway Centre, London W5 5JYMartha LambertMartha.Lambert@carillionservices.co.ukTime: Thursday 4-5 pmCode club projects help children learn to code in Scratch, HTML & CSS and Python by using step by step guides to make games, animations or websites. The projects gradually introduce coding concepts to allow children to build their knowledge incrementally.We also support active clubs with a range of extra resources like certificates and posters, as well as competitions and offers.To join the code club, we will need from a parents/ carers,1) A small permission form signed on the first day2) An email address which will be used by the children to create accounts for online resources.Please feel free to get in touch with me in case you have any questions. And do check website https://www.codeclub.org.uk/ if you want more information.Many Thanks,Sandeepsanmestry@gmail.com

Sandeep Mestry ● 3155d0 Comments ● 3155d

NHS: Why we can't trust two-faced Joy (Damschroder-)Morrissey nee Inboden (a.k.a. Boden)

Two-faced Joy (Damschroder-)Morrissey nee Iboden (a.k.a. Boden) Conservative candidate for Ealing Central and Acton waxed lyrical about she had come over to the UK to study the European model for social medicine (highlighting Sweden), however, her disdain of us Brits and oue view of the NHS is shocking in the following article in the Mirror (P.s. has anyone read her LSE Masters dissertation?):"Tory candidate mocked 'hysterical' Labour's NHS fears - in seat that's having its local hospital downgraded"Joy Morrissey accused the party of "fetishising" the service and said people should stop calling it "our NHS" or "treating it like a religion"  http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/tory-candidate-mocked-hysterical-labours-10562985A Tory election candidate mocked Labour as "deluded" and "hysterical" for warning about the NHS's future - in a seat whose local hospital is being downgraded.Joy Morrissey accused the party of "fetishising" the service and said people should stop calling it "our NHS" or "treating it like a religion" in a scathing blog last year.She wrote in January 2016: "The institution remains remarkably unchanged - the promised armageddon again failing to materialise."The credibility of these increasingly hysterical forecasts of doom can surely be no more than that of the deluded old soul wandering Oxford Street with his "The End Is Nigh' placard."The only one left for them now a NASA-style 10 second countdown."Her local Ealing Hospital is being downgraded from a district to a local hospital as part of national cost-cutting 'Sustainability and Transformation Plans' (STPs).She accused Labour of "fetishing" the service and told people to stop calling it "our NHS" (Photo: PA)The plan is set to cut the number of beds from 288 to 50 and leaves questions over the future shape of Ealing's A&E as part of a reduction from nine to five acute hospitals in north west London.The STP report says Ealing's current setup is "not financially sustainable" after it ran up a deficit of £30million.And it does not rule out an A&E downgrade, saying only: "No substantive changes to A&Es in Ealing will be made until there is sufficient alternative capacity out of hospital or in acute hospitals."The plan was formally published after Ms Morrissey's blog post last year, but campaigners said fears over Ealing Hospital had been known for some time. It has already had its paediatric and maternity wards closed with services moved elsewhere in north west London.Ms Morrissey's Labour rival Rupa Huq said: "This confirms what we already know - The Tories won’t protect Ealing [Hospital] because their candidate looks at our NHS with derision."She should apologise for these offensive remarks."Ms Morrissey is in a bitter battle to overturn the 274 majority of Labour's Rupa Huq (Photo: Getty)The hospital provides for thousands of people in the warring candidates' Ealing Central and Acton constituency, one of the most marginal seats in the country. It sits just outside the seat's boundary.Ms Huq is defending a majority of just 274 and the Greens and UKIP have pulled out to give each side a boost.Ms Morrissey wrote her blog post on the Conservative Way Forward website in January 2016 with a photo of her outside Ealing Hospital.In it she complained the Tories could "guarantee every patient the gift of eternal life and send them home with a complimentary pot of caviar and it still wouldn't be enough".She added: "Stop treating a valuable public service like a religion that can only be spoken of in a hushed tone of reverence rarely heard outside of the Vatican."We can begin by desisting from the glutinous and now obligatory practice of referring to 'Our' NHS.The blog post was written in January last year"For every member of the public that has bought into Labour's fetishisation of this institution there is an equally large and silent number that haven't."They do not gaze at the NHS with uncritical awe - and neither should we."Ms Morrissey became embroiled in a row over the NHS plans last week with Ms Huq.She pulled out of a hustings and threatened legal action against her Labour rival, accusing the campaign of "blatant lies" over a leaflet that said the hospital was closing.A spokeswoman for London North West Healthcare NHS Trust said: "There will be some changes at Ealing Hospital over the next three to five years, to provide local people with the services they use the most, so patients receive the best possible care. This will include a local A&E at Ealing Hospital.”Ms Morrissey has been contacted for comment by the Mirror, but had not replied at the time of publication.

John Alan Peters ● 3163d11 Comments ● 3162d

National Health Service breakdown and privatization: "Sustainability and Transformation Plans"

I'm deeply concerned that in the build up to the General Election there has been little discussion about the disastrous changes to the NHS being proposed by the local Sustainability and Transformation Plan, the "North West London STP" which covers 8 boroughs from Westminster to Hillingdon including Ealing. These plans for the 44 "footprint" regions of England and Wales have been made in a secretive manner, with very little public information and are nothing more than plans to slash, trash and privatise our NHS.          But most worrying are large private healthcare companies and their lobbyists, such as Virgin Care and American healthcare companies including UnitedHealth, the previous employer of Simon Stevens CEO of the NHS, which will chase the UK's expenditure through the NHS using the Health and Social Care Act 2012. This pressure will inexorably lead to the American model of healthcare management which causes 50% of personal bankruptcies each year in the US. All the STPs call for "Accountable Care Organisations/Systems", a term which Americans recognise only too well. This system with low fixed budgets will be screwed down so that it does not meet the public need and it will turn the health provision in England and Wales into a two tier health system where the rich will pay and the rest of us will be left with a very poor, minimal NHS, like the American Medicare/Medicaid system.        I would urge all readers to contact their candidates and let them know that the public will not stand for the destruction of the NHS and all MPs must reject the STPs and reject the move to Accountable Care Organisations. These "new models of care" will end the NHS as a comprehensive service that provides the full range of care to all who need it, free at the point of need and fully accountable to the public (private companies will hide their waste as well as their profits).              Readers can find their candidates on the website. www.whocanivotefor.co.uk/elections

Una-Jane Winfield ● 3164d3 Comments ● 3162d

May smile

A dying man gathered his lawyer, doctor and clergyman at his bed side and handed each of them an envelope containing $25,000 in cash. He made them each promise that after his death and during his repose, they would place the three envelopes in his coffin. He told them that he wanted to have enough money to enjoy the next life.A week later the man died. At the Wake, the Lawyer and Doctor and Clergyman, each concealed an envelope in the coffin and bid their old client and friend farewell.By chance, these three met several months later. Soon the Clergyman, feeling guilty, blurted out a confession saying that there was only $10,000 in the envelope he placed in the coffin. He felt, rather than waste all the money, he would send it to a Mission in South America. He asked for their forgiveness.The Doctor, moved by the gentle Clergyman's sincerity, confessed that he too had kept some of the money for a worthy medical charity. The envelope, he admitted, had only $8000 in it. He said, he too could not bring himself to waste the money so frivolously when it could be used to benefit others.By this time the Lawyer was seething with self-righteous outrage. He expressed his deep disappointment in the felonious behavior of two of his oldest and most trusted friends. "I am the only one who kept his promise to our dying friend. I want you both to know that the envelope I placed in the coffin contained the full amount. Indeed, my envelope contained my personal check for the entire $25,000."

Graham Weeks ● 3197d6 Comments ● 3178d

R.I.P Jerome Rogers

To those who dont know this young man received PCNs from Camden Council & was unable to pay which resulted in an impossible & obscene  debt of over £1000.Jerome, felt unable to cope & took his own life.Camden Council blood on their hands, maybe Ealing too.Something needs to be done.PCNs are a business, money making racket. All to often there are stories of the most harmless infringement resulting in a fine - Longfield Ave for example.Parking is at a premium yet Ealing Council anti car campaign, along with TFL, have bus lane fines, CPZ, turning restrictions, out of bay parking fines, yellow lines etc etc.Someone, some person - MAHFOUZ? set these restrictions & then people like poor Jerome cant cope.The buck is quickly passed to the bailiffs, but how is it legal or morally acceptable for the debt to spiral to amounts unpayable??I hate these councils restrictions, the dumb wardens, 2 faced unapproachable.The councils contractors all parked opposite Perceval house pushing traffic over on the side of the live bus lane. Dare you encroach will a ticket follow??Yet no lights are put out or tickets issued to vehicles actually causing a hazard or obstruction.far easier to find a vehicle an inch outside the markings, a householder stopped outside their house causing no harm. The motorist trying to get from A - B yet impeded by pointless obstructions.With respect to Jeromes mum I would say how much I really hate these  wardens & more so the councils.Whoever you are council person sleep well, blood on your hands, Mrs Rogers forgives, I resent.Either way Jerome has no choice but lives forever in our hearts.Perhaps our local MPs can or will take action, actually do something about this extortion rather than publicity for thenselves

Peter Yale ● 3197d0 Comments ● 3197d

Hanwell litter

This is from a poster on Facebook Hanwell Friends group and he asked me to post it here for him.Keith Freegard20 March at 09:46I picked 2 bags of litter today between Viaduct and Hanwell locks. At least 80% of the littered items are drinking related. All are tins of strong eastern european branded lagers - like Zubr; Tuskie;Walkizch;Debaum etc. the rest of litter is energy drinks, vodka and beer bottles plus snack food wraps, burger n chips , then smoking and drug related packs. So the 'target market' for any focussed behavior change is well-defined :-'Drinkers buying strong eastern EU branded lager from local shops who like to gather in parks and consume vast amounts of booze while smoking and eating fast food.'Oh and also members of this social group with very low respect for society and the environment ( most of them I guess). I also think there is some strange and twisted symbolism going on here, so that the very obvious pile of discarded cans is making a statement to the rest of the community. Maybe a sort of ' look at us, we can do what we like and do not accept your petty rules of living in a community'.... but I find it impossible to understand the minds of people who do this.Anyway - can the local council put some targetted effort into preventing the litter caused by this small group of offenders in our locality? maybe work with the shops who sell the drink n food? maybe offer incentives to get the blighters to pick up the littered drink cans? Maybe tour parks in evenings to indentify the drinking groups? Or maybe just allow those who pick up litter ( there ARE lots of us) to carry on sorting the symptons of this social disease.

Graham Weeks ● 3239d2 Comments ● 3238d

Paddington station layout

Paddington station is really not very accessible for those of us living in West London!  If you travel on the Circle/Hammersmith and City lines westbound across London you arrive at the far end of the station and have to walk along the taxi rank to see the arrivals boards and access the station.  From there it is impossible to reach platform 11 in the 2 minutes you are sometimes given to reach a train as the straightforward access to the platform has been blocked. You have to go all the way to the front of the station and then walk back all the way you have come back up the platform to reach the trains.  Not within 2 minutes!It is hard to know how to get to your platform once a train has been indicated on a screen by the taxi rank (where you arrive from the westbound Hammersmith and City and Circle lines). There are several entrances to the station there which are not well labelled to tell you which platforms are accessed from each.  There is no overall plan to refer to showing you what the layout is and how to get around.  Especially there is no indication of all the entrances to the Underground, which is complex there as they lead to different lines or different directions of travel.  There are two entrances to the Bakerloo line (also communicates via tunnel with the Hammersmith and City, and Circle lines East bound.  There is an entrance to the Hammersmith and City East line right at the front of the station, but the Hammersmith and City and Circle lines Westbound is right at the far end of the station on the West side on the upper level.  If you need to attend St Mary's hospital you have to walk all the way to the front of the station, and then double back and walk the whole length of the station again on the road outside.  Needless to say, people attending hospitals are not the young and fit.  There is perfectly good access to the hospital's road from the taxi rank, but that has been blocked off for no logical reason.What is more I very much fear that when Crossrail comes in the entrance to Crossrail will be from the East side of the station, and I suspect the track and trains will be on the far West side of the station.  Will people arriving on the West side of the station (eg on the Hammersmith and City, Circle line Westbound from Kings Cross etc)have to cross the entire station to get to the entrance to Crossrail and then back again to get on a train?Finally, I am concerned that Ealing Broadway station is going to become even more hectic, and already the situation on Platform 3 is quite frightening at times.  People belt down the single narrow stairway to catch a train,  in serious danger of taking a tumble down the stairs and taking others with them.  One would expect when Crossrail comes that the stairwells will be doubled in capacity at least, or there will be accidents.Design of public transport should take account of the fact that many travellers are not young fit and able to cope and consider those burdened with shopping, luggage, children, disability, age, illnesses. Will the arrangements at Ealing Broadway station adequately address the needs of the less agile or travellers burdened with luggage, shopping, children, wheelchairs, other disabilities?

Barbara Dore ● 3272d18 Comments ● 3262d

Public meeting. Proposed changes to Health provision

Thhe next Acton central ward forum will be held on 22nd February at St. Mary's church hall beginning at 7.00pm. This is important. Come if you can and bring your questions.Ealing CCG will be presenting an early draft of their proposals for changing primary and secondary health care in the Borough. You may want to hear what they have to say and have the opportunity to ask questions.be Amongst the proposals are : - a radical shift from care in hospital to care provided through new clinics. One for Southall. One for the current site of Ealing Hospital and one for Acton. Three 7 day GP services with early/late opening. One for Ealing Broadway.- A new frailty unit at Ealing Hospital focusing on older persons who may need a bed while diagnosis is done or care is arranged.- A "local" A&E at Ealing hospital with diagnostic services. Patients will still be seen urgently as now.- A target of  more patients given appropriate care and medication faster allowing a reduction in acute beds over time. - A  diagnostic and stabilisation admissions centre at Ealing hospital for patients needing hospital observation for up to seven days before being transferred for longer term care.These proposals are still at an early stage but we believe that you may want to hear them for yourselves. Do try and attend this public meeting. Ward forums are for everyone. Rallies like the one last week can be fun for the faithful and the speakers can be powerful, but we need a measured thoughtful response to the proposals. Placard waving doesn't cut it for all of us. If you can't make it to Acton, why not ask your ward Councillors to arrange a public meeting for your area and go along as a critical friend?

Maire Lowe ● 3269d3 Comments ● 3263d

A police warning?

I do not know how real this is but it makes sense.This is the thing these days, with people out of work and needing cash. Beware, it's headed your way. Just last weekend on Friday night we parked in a public parking area. As we drove away I noticed a sticker on the rear window of the car. When I took it off after I got home, it was a receipt for gas.. Luckily my friend told me not to stop as it could be someone waiting for me to get out of the car... Then we received this email yesterday: WARNING FROM POLICE THIS APPLIES TO BOTH WOMEN AND MEN BEWARE OF A PIECE OF PAPER ON THE BACK WINDOW OF YOUR VEHICLE--NEW WAY TO DO CARJACKING (NOT A JOKE) Heads up everyone ! Please, keep this circulating...You walk across the parking lot, unlock your car and get inside. You start the engine and shift into reverse... When you look into the rearview mirror to back out of your parking space, you notice a piece of paper stuck to the middle of the rear window. So, you shift into Park, unlock your doors, and jump out of your car to remove that paper (or whatever it is) that is obstructing your view. When you reach the back of your car, that is when the carjackers appear out of nowhere, jump into your car and take off. They practically mow you down as they speed off in your car. And guess what, ladies ? I bet your purse is still in the car. So now the carjacker has your car, your home address, your money, and your keys. Your home and your whole identity are now compromised ! BEWARE OF THIS NEW SCHEME THAT IS NOW BEING USED. If you see a piece of paper stuck to your back window, just drive away. Remove the paper later. And be thankful that you read this e-mail. I hope you will forward this to friends and family, especially to women. A purse contains all kinds of personal information and identification documents, and you certainly do NOT want it to fall into the wrong hands. Please keep this going and tell all your friends

Graham Weeks ● 3295d8 Comments ● 3293d

Funding for small local charity.

Not sure if this forum allows such posts and I am new to the world of charity fundraising, but here goes...I am a volunteer and committee member for a small yet vital charity based in Hanwell, Ealing - The Hanwell Neighbourly Care Scheme (HNCS).  The scheme offers support to older people in the area, helping in emergencies and encouraging contact through the development of local Pop-Ins, maintaining independence and nurturing friendship among older people. We also try to arrange regular lunches, day trips and other activities.Our charity is facing unprecedented pressure on funding and successful applications for grants and awards continue to be extremely challenging as we try to ensure the success of HNCS in both the short and the long term. We are reaching out to request support or advice in any capacity the local community can give?Below are links to both our Facebook page and current website (this is currently being overhauled and updated) which I hope give you some insight as to what we do. Please like, follow and share our page if you so wish!  Should you have any questions on such matters, or wish to find out anything else, please do not hesitate to contact me. I can easily put you in touch with our Co-ordinator/Outreach Worker or Committee Chair should this also be of assistance.Many thanks for your time, and I do hope you enjoy browsing the pages below :www.facebook.com/HanwellNCShttp://hncs.zohosites.com/contact.htmlRegards,Alan, HNCS

Alan Baverstock ● 3305d5 Comments ● 3301d

Commemorative  poppies

Last week whilst on afternoon poppy 'duty' in my mobility scooter at Waitrose West Ealing, it was nice to meet several 'Ealing Today' members who came to say hello.  As always, it was a pleasure, privilege and, at times, a moving experience to attend every day with my colleague 'Morning shift George' and to meet so many nice people. Last year we raised just over £3.800, I reckon we have topped that!  So many moments to remember.   The young man who said 'You sir, represent a generation that I greatly admire and sadly will never see the like again. May I have the honour to shake your hand' - as he squeeezed a £20 note in the tin.    The young lady who bestowed a kiss with the words 'Thank you and your kind for the quality of my life'   The Nun who offered a blessing with similar sentiments.  The elderly charming lady who said 'I lost my husband in 1944.  His aircraft crashed over Normandy leaving me with 2 young children. My memories are every day, I still miss and love him'.  I too choked, as a tear trickled down her cheek.    With a queue forming how does one respond to the young children who ask 'What's the flower for mummy?  Hopefully, more fully explained at home.   A profusion of heart string tugging moments that make it so worthwhile, so thank you kind folk, not only for your generosity, but also the pleasure of meeting you all.      Warm thanks are also due to the manager and staff of Waitrose who look after George and myself so well.   One last thought, neither of us are getting any younger so if anyone fancies a 'shift' next year to give us a break, please 'shout' you would enjoy the experience and we would be grateful.

Roy Bartlett ● 3367d2 Comments ● 3364d

Leo Rosso , S Ealing Rd now owned by Santa Maria

From facebook NorthfieldsIn response to the comments about The Red Lion and the apparent death of its heritage I would like to offer a slightly different opinion, my parents purchased the Red Lion 15 years ago and they worked hard to create a fabulous environment, not everyone might agree but that's how I feel, when Santa Maria arrived next door we had no idea how it would impact our family and our future, but I fell in love with one half of Santa Maria and we now have our own family, after the passing away of my mother my dad and my brother continued with the pub but as my Dad felt retirement was coming his way and the Boys at Santa Maria wanted more space it made sense to sell to them and not to complete strangers. The fact that Pasquale and Angelo have seen how much the pub is loved and want to keep things the way they are is a blessing and one I am truly grateful for but in terms of turning it into a pizza express you might be surprised to know they were offered a sell out scenario years ago and decided it wasn't the way they wanted to go, they want to keep a heart and soul in what they are creating and believe they can only do that with them at the helm. In this day and age when pubs are literally closing down all over the place I am thrilled to see the Red Lion busy and receiving some love and care, even some of our hard core regulars are loving the new vibe and they are happy to bear with us while we find our feet. So thanks to all of you who are supporting us !! We hope to continue to offer award winning beer in award winning environments just with a new offering of London’s best pizzaSo it's saved, and you can eat pizza outside now!

N Robinson ● 3398d37 Comments ● 3367d

Yet another rant about council failings

I'm sick and tired of Ealing Council trumpeting the fact that council tax has not increased for 8 years now - speaking on behalf of myself and neighbours I've discussed this with, we'd more than happily pay more council tax if it meant a better service. Ealing Council execs are taking home huge salaries (159 paid upwards of £50k, 11 paid £100k+) whilst IMHO many of our key services, such as our roads, social care, rubbish collections, sanitisation and management of fly-tipping are all degrading. It certainly feels like 'They Don't Work For You'. 1. Wheelie bins (been discussed to death already)Nobody wanted them, yet they've been foisted on us. If you're going to act in such dictatorial fashion at least get it right and provide the service that we've been railroaded into. It's seemingly a lottery as to what gets collected and when. In our household, we recycle almost everything, so have very little household rubbish, maybe one to two black bags every fortnight, but our recycling bin is full by the end of each week, meaning trips to local recycling centres for the additional. Yet even despite this our recycling bin is still not collected on schedule. This is always reported, but why do I have to waste my time filling out 5 webpages pretty much every collection week? The results are wheelie bins left blocking the pavements for days on end as nobody knows when they'll be collected, but can't afford to miss it. It's a well publicised shambles, yet in 4 months there's been no sign of improvement at all, even the contrary. 2. Stop wasting money on personal benefitsThe road changes implemented (Longfield Ave/Courtfield Gdns) without consultation and against the wishes of residents are wrong and the only justification for Longfield can be personal benefit for council employees. It was supposedly a trial, time for someone to front up and either reverse this or explain reasons why it should stay - funds raised by punishing unsuspecting drivers is contrary to the safety aspects which apparently were used as justification for this change. 3. Draconian raising of funds It was my understanding that CCTV enforcement cars were banned https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-bans-use-of-cctv-spy-cars-for-on-street-parking so why are they still in use in Ealing? I have seen one around Ealing on an almost daily basis for the last couple of weeks. I'm not against parking fines for drivers flouting the laws, but surely the council shouldn't be breaking the law themselves. Would any councilors care to comment as to why they are being used? My understanding was that CCTV vehicles should only ever be used where it would be physically impossible or dangerous for a CEO to attend in the usual way. Clearly that's unlikely to be the case in the backstreets of Ealing. I'm sure others have other grumbles to add, but these are the main ones that annoy me. I suspect (and hope) there will be wholesale changes at the next local elections, right now I feel the council is a self-serving organisation running roughshod over its residents.

Philip Slater ● 3420d2 Comments ● 3412d

Council: Not much time for the unwell

Terry Freestone and Philippa Bond make an excellent point about Ealing Council not increasing Council Tax by two per cent to cover requirements in Adult Social Welfare (which is is allowed to in spite of Central Grovernment caps).I have broken my reply to them on the other rubbish colelction-related thread where they refer to this as I think it is very important as few people reaise that many on the cuts in care and support for adults could have been avoided.Ealing Labour Group has bever had much time for the disabled or adults in need of care. It is a political group rather than a social group. The fact that Poltical Assistants are still employed and paid for by the Council while disabled care centres are closed emphasizes this situation. We have seen extra charges imposed in adult respite care and for Council Tax for the disabled and their carers (who do what they do out of love and not for money saving the state a fortune). The two percent hike in Council Tax for adult social care could have helped keep many facilities for the ill and for the disabled open. Once a leading Labour apparatchik told me that there were only two homeless in Ealing, who didn't want to live indoors, although there were already hundreds of rough sleepers in Ealing, as these people were not legal, and were not signed on, they did not exist and so were not homeless. This mentality prevails today in Ealing Labour, with the emphasis on ignoring those that are not part of the latest (Stalinist) five-year plan.

John Murias ● 3456d8 Comments ● 3415d

Lack of neighbour notification - Planning

Not long ago, the Council's Planning Department announced that they were no longer sending out the usual neighbour notification letters giving 21 days in which to comment. A system that we have become used to. The department assured people that Public Notices on lampposts were quite sufficient to keep people informed of developments in their area and to allow them to participate in the decision-making process.I live in Acton and this new system is simply not working! The property next door applied to build a second house in their back garden. The original Notice was apparently seen by a neighbour but was gone by the next day. I reported this to the Planning Department. A second Notice was put up in only one of the two roads affected (as it is a corner plot). That disappeared within 24 hours. I again reported this to the Council and a third Notice was put up which again was gone by morning.I doubt whether many neighbours are aware of what is going on and it seems ridiculous that the Council stopped sending out letters to neighbours to save postage, but now instead they are having to send staff out 3 times to the same property and there are still no Notices in either of the 2 roads.On reading the news item on this website that Planning Officers are now being allowed to grant planning permission for up to 50 flats without any involvement of the Planning Committee Councillors, this would seem to be the end of planning control in Ealing!

Nicky Hermes ● 3576d17 Comments ● 3502d

Visit the oldest allotments in London  - Saturday 25th June

Northfield Allotments in Northfield Avenue, Ealing is opening its gates again for its second annual open day on Saturday 25th June from 1pm-5pm.Entrance is FREE.This year you can:·      Wander round the site and see what is growing – we’d love to know which is your favourite plot.·      See our heritage plot and go inside our World War II Anderson shelter·      Find out more about our wildlife and history on a guided walk of the site at 2pm and 4pm – pick up a ticket at the main gate on the day·      Talk to Tom our beekeeper and see his demonstration hive·      Visit our potager plot – to see how you could grow flowers and vegetables together at home·      See how one plotholder made a wildlife friendly shed from recycled materials·      Buy plants and vegetables·      Sit, relax and enjoy some tea and really lovely cakes from our refreshment stall This year we have been doing lots of research into the site and have now discovered that we are the oldest allotment gardens in London. We love our allotments and are keen to share them with fellow gardeners. So, please do come and join us, and see what is growing. Whether you want to chat with plotholders who are passionate about gardening or just come and soak in the atmosphere of this beautiful place – you will be very welcome.I know many people really enjoyed visiting the site last year - so if you missed out - you're in for a treat. Dogs are welcome too (if on a lead).Christina FoxChair of the Ealing Dean Allotment Societywww.ealingdean.co.uk

Christina Fox ● 3538d5 Comments ● 3506d

"Missing" Planning Applications - Public Register.

For almost 30 years to my knowledge, Planning Applications have been available to view and comment on.  Originally, before computers were widely used, the Public Register consisted of a buff-coloured foolscap cardboard folder at the Council's offices where the public could have immediate access to it. The Public Register contained the Application, Drawings & Plans, Agent's cover letter, Tree Report, etc.A few years ago, Planning Reception at Perceval House started referring callers to the Council's Website where these documents were available to view and print off.  One Council (Slough Borough Council) applied software to prevent easy printing though!In Ealing, up until the Planning Administrator, Mrs Chris Hall left the Council in the latter part of last year followed by her deputy Miss Michele Power, the Applications and supporting papers had always been available on the Council's Planning Website.But in recent months, all of a sudden most Application Forms seem to be completely missing from the Web.I have today written a 4-page letter to Mr Paul Najsarek, the new Chief Executive of Ealing Council asking that the Council publishes the Applications as before and importantly, as it is required to do by law.Please see at: https://www.dropbox.com/s/8lc1be6vjjzxkem/PaulNajsarek_26thMay2016.pdf?dl=0with one of the two attachments at:https://www.dropbox.com/s/vihb2akttgxtkg6/ApplicationForms_FiveCouncils.pdf?dl=0

Victor Mishiku ● 3539d5 Comments ● 3510d

Councillors' Anger Over Accusations of Planning Bias

Picking up on the Ealing Today article dated 26 May 16 “Councillors' Anger Over Accusations of Planning Bias” and specifically looking at what Councillor Lauren Wall was reported to have said (i.e., ''The report to planning committee members … states, ‘two storey flat roofs are not uncharacteristic of this conservation area with original and modified examples to late Victorian and Edwardian properties evident on Manor Court Road, Church Road and Campbell Road.’”), I couldn’t help but notice that she’d omitted the word, and to my mind it is rather crucial – ‘side’. Anyway, I was intrigued so yesterday I walked the length and breadth of Manor Court Road, Church Road and Campbell Road in search of examples of the two storey flat roofs, original or modifications to late Victorian and Edwardian properties.  I couldn’t find one… but admittedly, I was looking for two storey flat roof side extensions to late Victorian and Edwardian properties as that is, after all, what this dispute is all about.I did find one property at 28 Manor Court Road with a two storey flat roof side extension but it was a modification to a post WW2 mock Tudor property.  There were quite a few single storey flat roof side extensions – most of which were garages – particularly in Manor Court Road.  There was another two storey flat roof side extension in Church Road at the Bunny Park end, but again, it was to a post WW2 house.I wonder does the Report that Councillor Lauren Wall referred to actually give the addresses of the examples to which it refers?

Moira Walker ● 3522d1 Comments ● 3521d

REAL AIM OF EU PROJECT

REAL AIM OF EU PROJECT Daily Mail Reader's letter written today 27 May.Altiero Spinelli (1907-1986) was a former Italian communist who was imprisoned for 12 years on Ventotene off the west coast of Itay, following which he was interned for six more. With co-author Ernesto Rossi , he wrote the Ventotene Manifesto for a federal Europe controlled by a supranational government. He was a committed relentless advocate of a federal Europe suprastate who climbed rapidly through Europe's organisational system by covertly driving strategic elements of the EU 'project' to where it is today. He is revered by Brussels Eurocrats as the founding father of the EU following the introduction of his Spinelli Plan in 1984. Such was his influence that the largest EU Parliament building is named after him. Those who seek to dismiss Boris Johnson's comparison of failed attempts by dictators of the past to create a European superstate should heed these words of the Ventotene Manifesto: 'The problem which must first be solved is the final abolition of the division of Europe into sovereign national states. Without this, any progress will be appearance only.' What could be clearer? The final abolition of sovereign nation states and with it every vestige of national identity.: this was the covert goal from day one in the Twenties of what eventually became known as the 'project' , set in train by three people, Jean Monet, Arthur Salter and Paul-Henri Speak. Held to be sacrosanct by successive unelected and unaccountable EU Commissioners for decades, it continues to be so. David Cameron's support for the continued domination of the people of this country by a group of unelected, cabbalistic technocrats in Brussels is treacherous in the extreme.

Jean F Fernandez ● 3538d0 Comments ● 3538d

Expecting, and interested in child development?

Hi all,I'm currently studying for an MSc in Psychodynamics of Human Development with the British Psychotherapy Foundation. As part of this course, I'm required to conduct an infant observation for a period of up to 2 years. What stage of birth?Ideally, I'd met you while you are pregnant, discuss times and what would be suitable for you, and go through your expectations and any concerns you may have.If you're willing to take part, we'll set a time as close as you feel comfortable after birth. I'd come at a similar time each week for just an hour. There is no need to do anything for me, you would just carry on with your day and I would simply observe the baby.How long will it go on for?Infant observations typically cover up to 2 years of a child's life, and the course requires at least 15 months of observations. So I'll need you to be sure you'd be happy and able to commit to this. i.e. that you have no immediate plans to move country during this period etc. Of course holidays are expected, and we would arrange observations around this or simply take breaks during this time.What area(s) are you interested?I'm looking for is a family in London, preferably West London, or commutable from the Waterloo to Addlestone /Weybridge line or South Ealing tube station, but I'm very flexible and willing to commute further.When do you need to start observations?I'm ready to begin once I've found a suitable and stable family, who are interested in taking part and understand the commitment involved.A bit about me:I am 32 years old female, living in London with my partner. I am extremely approachable, friendly and considerate individual. I have been an aunt since I was 15, and am very comfortable with young children, having 2 nieces and 4 nephews. I currently work for a national charity in London but am planning to train as an adult psychotherapist after the course. I've just graduated from the Open University last year and hold a cleared enhanced DBS certificate (specifically undertaken for this infant observation).If you're interested, or have any questions, please get in touch or message me via Mumsnet: http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/pregnancy/2625140-Help-needed-for-infant-observation?msgid=60739787 Best,Tophuong

TP Tran ● 3563d0 Comments ● 3563d

Why would a local Councillor register himself and family members in two addresses at the same time?

Our council leader, Julian Bell and/or his wife, simultaneously registered themselves and the same family members in their private house in Eastfields Road as well as their housing association house in Noel Road, just round the corner. He did this on the Ealing electoral register for two years running in 2008 and 2009. Why do you think he would do that? Also, for three years (2011, 2012 and 2013) Cllr Bell and family registered themselves in his private Eastfields Rd house and no-one was registered in his housing association place in Noel Road. If his registrations were truthful why would social landlord A2Dominion allow him to keep the social home and why didn't he give the home back to them so a family in need might have it? This is a social home with a rent subsidised by us tax payers and as I understand it Cllr Bell will be getting a subsidy of around 70% off the market rent. If his family didn't live in the social home for three years because they were living at his other house then surely they don't need the housing association house anymore? If they were really living in the social home then why did hhe or his wife fill in a electoral registration form to Ealing Council saying they weren't? Why would a councillor, of all people, register falsely? Wouldn't false registrations call into question his honesty?Interestingly, in election years 2010 and 2014 Cllr Bell and/or his wife registered family members back in the housing association house again. I wonder why. Perhaps they thought those years might get more attention?It is all very strange and must have been done for a reason. What reason(s) do people think it could have been done for?

Michael Mckenna ● 3598d5 Comments ● 3571d

Come and Sing!  Choral workshop with Ralph Allwood.  Saturday 21st May 2016

Come and Sing!   Choral workshop with Ralph Allwood.Saturday 21st May 2016 St Thomas the Apostle ChurchBoston Road, W7 2ADRegistration from 10:30amWorkshops 11 am to 1 pm and 2pm to 4pm.Light lunch and refreshments provided.Informal concert 4:30pm to 5:15pm.  (Audience welcome.)Please join us at St Thomas the Apostle, Boston Road, Hanwell, for a day of choral workshops, culminating in an informal performance of some established favourites and new pieces from the Anglican choral tradition.  We are keen to share these pieces not just with experienced singers, but also with those who are new to this kind of choral singing –  so do come along if you haven’t sung this kind of music before.  We very much want to share the pleasures of this music-making with others – whether you are an Anglican, from another Christian denomination, of another faith, or of no faith. We will be singing:G.F. Handel: Zadok the PriestHubert Parry: I Was GladVaughan Williams arrangement of ‘the Old Hundredth’ - All People that on Earth do Dwell.Will Todd: Softly – a simple and beautiful new anthem, rather quieter than the rest of the programme.David Willcocks: Sing! A choral arrangement of the Toccata from Widor’s ‘Organ' Symphony (No. 5)We will be providing musical scores on the day – it helps if you can read music, but isn’t essential, and there will be experienced singers at the event to lead and support.  You can also find recordings and videos of the pieces on streaming music services and youtube – in some cases with the individual parts picked out. We are very pleased that Ralph Allwood MBE will lead the event. Ralph was for 26 years Director of Music at Eton College and is now a freelance choral director. Ralph is Director of the Eton Choral Courses, Junior Choral Courses, and Director of the Rodolfus Choir, which has produced over 20 CDs;  Gramophone magazine described their singing as ‘unspeakably beautiful'. Ralph is also founder and conductor of Inner Voices, a choir made up of some of the very best singers from state schools across London. He is also Director of Music at the Old Royal Naval College in Greenwich.    www.ralphallwood.com St. Thomas the Apostle Church is on Boston Road, about 800m north of Boston Manor underground station, and served by E8 and 195 bus services. St Thomas’s is a grade II* building, widely acknowledged as one of the finest new churches built between the wars. The event is part of celebrations marking the restoration of St. Thomas’s magnificent Walker pipe organ, and the programme has a slant towards pieces that combine choral singing with powerful organ accompaniment. www.thomashanwell.org.ukWe will serve a simple lunch of vegetarian soup with bread, but you are very welcome to bring your own lunch, particularly if you have special dietary needs. We want to make the event open to all, but we have suggested a donation of at least £10 to cover the costs of the day (and more generous contributions are very welcome!)Please email to Natalie.Hyacinth.2015@live.rhul.ac.uk to register for the event by Thursday 19th May 2016, giving your name, your singing voice (Soprano/Alto/Tenor/Bass), and your contact details. The event is supported by Making Suburban Faith, a research project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council as a part of its ‘Connected Communities’ programme, and based at University College London and Royal Holloway, University of London.  The research project examines the creativity of different suburban faith communities particularly as expressed in architecture, material culture, ritual, music and performance. www.makingsuburbanfaith.org

Nick Robinson ● 3577d0 Comments ● 3577d

Vote for Ealing Half Marathon!!

Ealing needs your help to spread the word: http://www.ealingtoday.co.uk/default.asp?section=info&page=earunningawards001.htmThere's still time to help Ealing make its mark in the running world once again.Ealing Half Marathon has its sights set on a third consecutive win at The Running Awards 2016. Voted the UK’s Best Half Marathon in 2014 and 2015,  it has once again been shortlisted for the UK’s Best Half Marathon at this year’s awards on Friday 22nd April.Voting at The Running Awards is now closed in most categories except for Best Half Marathon, Best Marathon and Favourite Charity. Voting for the Half Marathon and Marathon categories closes at 6pm on Wednesday 20th April, and the Charity category remains open until 10.00pm on the awards evening.Voting is quick and simple, all you need is your name and email address. Please go to http://therunningawards.com/vote/30/32#vote and vote for the Ealing Half Marathon before 6pm on 20th April.As a Community Interest Company (CIC), Ealing Half Marathon is hoping to secure some last minute votes from locals who benefit from the community projects funded by the event and from all those who have been inspired to run thanks to the race. Throughout the year, the CIC engages in community activities including school presentations, children’s clubs and coaching, and running clubs for adults – all of which have seen local residents of all ages don their running shoes and get active.A win at The Running Awards 2016 would be a fantastic precursor for the BT Sport Industry Awards 2016, which take place just a week later and in which the Ealing Half Marathon CIC has also been shortlisted. The race is deservedly enjoying the recognition and accolades that it has received over its five-year history, as it is very unique in what it gives back to the community.Kelvin Walker, Director of Ealing Half Marathon CIC and Race Director of the Half Marathon, commented: “We are absolutely thrilled to have been shortlisted once more for Best Half Marathon at The Running Awards 2016. It was an honour to win this category the past two years and we are incredibly grateful to all those who have voted for us so far. We like to think of the Ealing Half Marathon as a real community race with the professional touch, and we are proud that our hard work in the community is being recognised.“Thank you to all those who have voted for us again at this year’s awards. We are looking forward to a wonderful night of celebration for the running industry as a whole.“Entries for our 2016 race are open and anyone wishing to run and to support our work in the community should go to the website and sign up as soon as possible.”The Ealing Half Marathon has raised over £850,000 since its inauguration in 2012, and is looking forward to welcoming 8,000 runners of all abilities to its fifth anniversary race on Sunday 25th September 2016. Go to www.ealinghalfmarathon.com for further race details and to sign up now, like the Facebook page www.facebook.com/ealinghalf and follow @EalingHalf on Twitter to keep up to date with all the latest news about the Ealing Half Marathon.Go to www.therunningawards.com for full details of The Running Awards 2016 and to vote for Ealing Half Marathon by 6pm on 20th April.Thank you so much!!

Sandra Courtney ● 3581d0 Comments ● 3581d

LICENSING LANDLORDS

The Council wants to force all landlords, not just HMO landlords, in Acton Central, East Acton, South Acton, Southall Green and Southall Broadway to be licensed at a cost of £500 per property.  They are currently 'consulting'.  They have paid Harper Mayhew Associates to come up with a 'Case for Selective Licensing'. It is hard going. Ealing is blinding landlords and tenants with science.  The report even fails to do the job the way the law requires.   Mayhew ends by asking the Council to do further work and come up with its own case.  The Council has failed to do this.   As part of the project the Council has compiled a secret register of "suspected" rented properties.  They are refusing to say what it contains, but it seems to contain the names of residents and it associates them with incidents of antisocial behaviour and crime for which there is no evidence they were responsible.  Are you on this sinister register?  Have you been defamed?  The Council claims the proposed new licensing schemes are needed because it doesn’t have enough powers to deal with problems.  The real problem is they don’t use the powers they have.  How often have you made a complaint about noise, nuisance etc. and got nowhere?  The Consultation is turning out to be a sham. At the Acton meeting for the public to ask questions and be listened to,  the council representative failed to answer an important question when he was interrupted and the last part of the event, the “Plenary Session”, when we were supposed to ask questions and get answers from the Council representatives never took place.  Rather conveniently they  did not reappear until people had already begun to leave the meeting. Thus the only chance for the public to put their questions and have  them answered  by the Council was lost!! 

vincent paul WRIGLEY ● 3612d0 Comments ● 3612d

What a waste of money

Occasionally I need to drive into the office, which involves a soul-destroying slog along the A40 into London - today was one of those days. Whilst sitting practically motionless in traffic I noticed the new ‘average speed camera’ system all the way along the A40. The first thing that struck me was I’d like to find any person who’s managed to exceed the speed limit and give them a medal. Surely the only time it’s possible to sustain a speed above the limit would be late night through to the early morning, so why on earth are we spending so much money on this system? It certainly doesn’t look like it came on the cheap and I can’t see how it’ll ever pay for itself. For 18 hours of the day drivers will be creeping by at single-digit mph. I think road safety is a very important issue, but I don’t see how this system will do anything to help. Going by TFL’s own figures, only 21% of fatal accidents in London involved ‘speed as a contributory factor’. That’s still a lot of people dying, but as a proportion it’s low. Now if these cameras had some sort of detection for people texting, updating facebook or taking selfies on their phone as they drive then I’d be far more supportive – I’d bet my life that is now a far higher contributory factor to fatal accidents. If you don’t believe me then just do the journey I did this morning and have a look around, nobody seems to be looking at the road. Surely there were better ways to spend money on the A40, as long as I can remember it’s been like a big car park and I can’t imagine average speed cameras will do anything to improve that. A more cynical person might feel that they're just a bit more state surveillance in the name of health and safety, but either way it seems to me it’s a huge waste of money.

Philip Slater ● 3794d18 Comments ● 3658d

Acton Aerodrome

  It's not been a great day in the Wood household today,first the central heating boiler cast off it's mortal coil on the coldest day of the year. Then the front door lock decided it only has one position....locked with the usual occupants on the outside in the snow and sleet. I smashed a hole in the top of the door and persuaded my wife that falling five feet head first probably wouldn't hurt that much if she did a parachutist roll before she landed,she didn't and it did!    Since then it's been fairly quiet,both disaster wise and wife wise,leaving plenty of time for reflection and nostalgia.    Something caused me to remember,that as a kid my Grandad always talking about when he worked at Ruffy Baughmanns based at Acton Airfield as a mechanic in the 1920s..                    Acton Airfield? I hear you say, yes well until today so did I,but it turns out that if you Google Acton Aerodrome/Airfield there's quite a lot of "stuff" about it which to an anorak first class,is interesting and if you're a LBE local history type then there is lots to learn.     A good place to start is at      http://www.bmanor.co.uk/pics/Acton_Airfield.pdf     Funny thing is I used to work in Concord Rd and Alliance Road ,Alliance being the name of the company building single seat aircraft (dub.) Concord Road is a new road named after the plane but minus the "e" good old GB!!!    That's it....it's freezing in bed...I may be a while.         

Tony Wood ● 3676d35 Comments ● 3665d

Ealing Council blows £200K on virtue signalling

I am quite happy to see Ealing Council being broadly supportive of higher wages for the low paid but I am not sure to what extent it should be a priority if it means taking cash from frontline services for what is essentially virtue signalling by businesses and the council.  Yesterday’s announcement of £200K in business rates relief for local businesses looks good on the face of it but is in reality just a bung to Citizens UK which is a churchy advocacy movement.  All well and good but there is no way that Ealing Council could ever justify a £100K a year grant of unrestricted funds to Citizens UK and this looks all too much like a back door way of supporting an advocacy group rather than a boon to local businesses.  There will be lots of voluntary organisations which do work directly with needy people in Ealing who will wonder why Ealing council has taken millions of Pounds off them in recent years but is now bunging Citizens UK £200K.  The money that the council is diverting from vital services such as childrens’ services is going to be used to pay £500 a year fees for businesses to be accredited by what is effectively a campaign or subsidiary of Citizens UK called the Living Wage Foundation.  This is really just a trading name of Citizens UK which is constituted as a charity.  Citizens UK sucks and blows about £1 million per annum so this new source of funds for Citizens UK is worth about 10% of their total income for two years – a good deal for them if Ealing businesses take it up.  This exercise is just virtue signalling on the public purse.  The Council itself says:Ealing Council is marking its intention to become a Living Wage BoroughGreat, £200K worth of marking.  More expensive even than Bassam Mahfouz’s Christmas tree which was £13K spent signalling the council's recycling credentials.  Next time Julian Bell tells you how heartbroken he is over cuts ask him how he found this £200K.

Phil Taylor ● 3744d3 Comments ● 3741d

Planned Tube improvement works affecting services in Ealing

From TfL Press OfficeMajor rail junction replacement will improve reliability of District and Piccadilly lines                                        • Hanger Lane rail junction to be modernised in October• Work will ensure the junction is more reliable and trains will run faster• Forms part of complete modernisation of four Tube linesA major rail junction will be replaced next month to improve reliability on both the District and Piccadilly lines.London Underground (LU) engineers and contractors will completely renew and realign the Hanger Lane junction to make it faster, smoother and more reliable for the thousands of customers who travel through the area each day.The junction rebuild involves breaking out and renewing track and signalling over nine days from Saturday 24 October to Sunday 1 November. During the work the District line will need to close between Ealing Broadway and Turnham Green, with the Piccadilly line closing from Acton Town to Uxbridge on the two weekends during the period. Other Tube services will continue to serve the area, as will rail replacement and local bus services. TfL will publicise the closure and alternative routes to customers to minimise disruption and keep them up to date.Innovative use of modern installation techniques means the work will be done in two halves, rather than all at once, allowing the Piccadilly line to remain open on weekdays. In the past the new points, which are moving sections of track that allow trains to change from one line to another, would have been installed all at once, closing both lines throughout the work.LU will take full advantage of the closure of the District line section to carry out other essential work at Ealing Broadway, preparing for the full modernisation of the line. Engineers will also replace an additional 330 metres of track, making the entire area more reliable, with a smoother ride.During the closure there will be some changes to transport services:• The District line will not run between Ealing Broadway and Turnham Green. But the Central line will continue to serve Ealing Broadway every day as normal• The Piccadilly line will run as normal on weekdays, providing alternative Tube routes from Ealing Common and Acton Town • The Piccadilly line will close between Acton Town and Uxbridge on the weekends of 24/25 October and 31 October/1 November• Trains will not run from Chiswick Park Underground station throughout, but it will be open to serve customers with tickets and information• Rail replacement buses will serve Ealing Broadway, Ealing Common, Acton Town and Chiswick Park throughout the work, supplementing existing local bus routes• LU will run 50 per cent more District line services to Richmond to serve the semi-finals and final of the Rugby World Cup on 24, 25 and 31 OctoberThe work forms part of the next phase of the Underground's modernisation, bringing faster, more frequent and more reliable journeys to millions of Circle, District, Hammersmith & City and Metropolitan line passengers. Customers are already seeing a new fleet of air-conditioned trains being introduced, which will all be in service by the end of 2016. Work will soon begin on new signalling and control systems for the four lines, with the improvements together boosting capacity by an average of a third.David Waboso, LU’s Director of Capital Programmes, said: “Our engineers and contractors will be working around the clock to replace this complex junction. I am sorry for the disruption to customers during the closure, which we will keep as short as possible. When the junction re-opens, it will be immediately more reliable and trains will be able to travel faster through it. District line customers will see more and more new trains over the next year, followed by a complete modernisation of the line’s signalling that will radically improve journeys.”ENDSNotes to editors• Hanger Lane rail junction is where the Ealing Broadway branch of the District line divides from the Uxbridge branch of the Piccadilly line • The work does not affect Hanger Lane Underground station • During the closure, three fewer off peak trains will run each hour on the District line between Turnham Green and Barking • Following the work, trains will be able to run faster and more smoothly through the junction. Points failures will be much less frequent, meaning fewer delays to customers and more reliable journeys through Ealing and Chiswick • The current Hanger Lane railway junction was built in 1984 and the poor condition of the ground on which it rests requires frequent maintenance and leads to repeated points failures, causing delays to District and Piccadilly line customers

Patrick Green ● 3790d1 Comments ● 3756d

Dropped Kerb / Front Garden Crossover - End of Terrace

Hi, I have 3 questions about: dropping my kerb in LB Ealing; contractors to prepare my front garden; and materials to use.I live in Hanwell and several of my neighbours have recently dropped their kerbs and two houses, including my next-door neighbours', are having their front gardens paved as I type.Having resisted for several years, I think I may now have to do the same thing, otherwise I'll often need to park on another road, which for various reasons, will make life pretty difficult for me.However, I live on the end of a terrace and have a shared drive with an existing dropped kerb at the alley way between the houses.  I've been told that Ealing Council will not allow me to drop the kerb in front of my house because of this shared dropped kerb.  A neighbour tells me that they will allow me to extend the shared dropped kerb by 60cm / 2 feet towards my house, which should be enough to drive onto the front area at an angle.Apparently, this rule was brought in 5-10 years ago to dissuade people from paving over their front gardens.  It certainly hasn't had any effect in my road or the surrounding area!My questions:1.  Does anyone know if there is a way around the rule which prevents me dropping the kerb in front of the house?  Parking is so close that I don't see how I will have sufficient room to drive on to the front at an angle.2.  Does anyone have direct experience or knowledge of any permeable materials which are fairly low maintenance and allow rainwater to soak into the soil, rather than going directly into the sewerage system?3.  Can anyone recommend a builder or contractor who can work with permeable materials and doesn't just want to cover everything with concrete or impermeable membranes?Thanks!

Phil Kay ● 3773d9 Comments ● 3768d

Donate An Hour for Guide Dogs

Can you give us just one hour of your day on Tuesday 6th October 2015 between 7am-7pm to help us celebrate Guide Dogs Week?Every hour, another person in the UK goes blind.When someone loses their sight, the charity Guide Dogs is there to make sure they don’t lose their freedom as well. By donating just an hour of your time, you will be making a huge difference to the lives of people who are blind or partially sighted.The charity Guide Dogs does not receive any government funding. The lifetime cost of one guide dog is £50,000 and we rely on the generosity of donations to fund our life-changing work. Guide Dogs Week runs from 3-11 October and we are holding our largest collection across the capital on Tuesday 6th October. In order to make the most of the day, we need to have as many collectors as possible on the streets. We have designated several collection points across London already, including one outside Ealing Broadway Station. If none of these are convenient for you, we would be happy to consider other suggestions.If you are able to help us with this for even an hour - before/after work, lunchtime or during the day - you will be helping a person living with sight loss to regain their freedom of movement and independence.Alternatively, you may prefer to fundraise for us in your workplace through a collection or event such as cake sale. For more information please visit our website:http://www.guidedogs.org.uk/microsites/guide-dogs-week-2015/#.VgO5fTZ0zct

Desiree Polluk ● 3784d1 Comments ● 3784d

Diesel - Just Say No!

A recent BBC Radio 4 programme has highlighted new evidence from the World Health Organisation that diesel pollution has been strongly linked to lung infections in young babies and lung and bladder cancer for people exposed to it over longer periods. What plans do the council, the government and city hall have to tackle the issue? What are Environmental Health Officers for if not to protect us from deadly influences? Modern pollution can’t be seen – the effects are long term and therefore easy for politicians to ignore.In an effort to improve air quality motorists were once encouraged to use diesel vehicles. The thinking was that there would be fewer environmental pollutants released in our urban areas as a result of the increased use of more efficient fuels. In the 90s, tougher regulation of the motor industry resulted in a reduction in car emissions. However, as more people opt for diesel, emissions have started to rise sharply.With this new evidence  and the established fact that diesel vehicles emit 10-20 times more particles than petrol cars, should something not be done to tackle the massive increase in their usage in our towns? If people are being forced to use them to save fuel costs then vehicle manufacturers should be forced to clean them up.I am concerned that the test conditions manufacturers adhere to to ensure their new vehicles meet the necessary emissions targets are not tough enough.  They aren’t as demanding as the real stop start urban driving conditions and higher power demands vehicles are put through in towns. Under real conditions vehicles produce huge numbers of complex deadly pollutants including oxides of nitrogen. Leeds University’s research on Nitrogen Oxide emissions from diesel vehicles shows that Nitrogen Dioxide is a marker for a cocktail of dangerous gasses present in fumes. DEFRA need to revise their test requirements to prevent the car industry releasing harmful vehicles on to our streets.For its part the EU has set pollution limits across the Eurozone to combat vehicle emissions. However, according to data from monitoring stations in London these limits have been breached for some years and the UK will face a heavy fine as a result. 40 out of 43 assessment zones fail to meet targets according to the Commons Environmental Audit Committee’s findings last November. We as a nation are on target to miss the vital EU air pollution limit for which we will be assessed in 2015. The target date has already been delayed at the request of our government.Instead of initiating real, practical measures to combat this rise in deadly pollutants, it has been discovered by the campaign group Clean Air for London that dust suppressant trucks have been deployed on our roads. These are converted gritters that spray the road with water to stick the harmful particles to the tarmac. If they had any practical benefit to citizens of London or if the Mayor really cared about the health of those most at risk then their efforts would surely be concentrated around schools and hospitals. However, Clean Air for London have discovered that these vehicles concentrate their work around the monitoring sites most likely to show a breach of legal pollution limits when the figures are sent back to Brussels. Is this not a case of London’s citizens being hoodwinked by the Mayor of London? He may be appear to be an affable character but he obviously doesn’t care that we are all having years taken off our lives to secure his political ambitions.The medical evidence for the damage to us from vehicle emissions is stacking up. Certain gaseous emissions and particulates coming from diesel fumes are extremely inhalable and remain in our lungs indefinitely. What are the unknown effects of this?In Millhouses, East Sheffield, local campaigner Neil Perry has gathered results from a diffusion tool to measure pollution from vehicle fumes in an initiative called East End Quality of Life. He has shown that at Christmas and New Year, when car use is at its heaviest and CO2 concentrations are at their highest level for the year, children’s hospitals experience epidemics of bronchialitis in small babies. The virus that causes this has been shown to be triggered by nitric oxide. Even if you regard any of these facts as insignificant in the face of the possible financial savings involved with using diesel fuel then you need to digest the following fact. Respiratory illness caused by pollution is the biggest public health challenge after smoking. The cost on public health care arising from lung disease deaths is estimated at around £8-20 billion per year.It is my view that the scientific world holds a consensus that climate change is happening and that it is a result of human activity. I feel, however, that it is better to tackle the harmful effects of pollution that are closest to us. Even if you believe the unqualified climate change deniers you must still agree that we need to get dirty vehicles out of our cities. EU pollution limits are being breached in dozens of UK conurbations.The government should encourage people away from diesel. If we are breaching EU pollution levels then that means that we are guilty as drivers, particularly of diesel cars. Businesses owners, most of which require transport, are also guilty. And failing to deal with this folly and perhaps most guilty of all is the government, council leaders, MPs, the Mayor, and the EU for not making us comply!You can hear the programme that inspired me to write this on BBC iPlayer.Channel: BBC Radio 4Programme: File on 4Date: 07/08/2012Reporter: Julian O’Halloran

Alan Anderson ● 4884d12 Comments ● 3785d

Acton Main Line Neighbourhood Forum

An application has been sent to Ealing Council for the formation of The Acton Main Line Neighbourhood Forum by some people who want more say in the increasing number of developments around the future Crossrail station.The Localism Act of 2011 handed residents and businesses the power to work with councils and developers on a neighbourhood plan for their own area.Jan Gayle-Farlow, the forum's acting chair, said: 'My neighbours and I realised that each new development proposal is being treated as though it's the only one in the area. We need to think more holistically about planning in Acton.' Dee Kelly, a committee member, said, 'I know we need more housing, but where are all the children going to go to school? We'd like more input into what should be community space. A neighbourhood plan would benefit everyone.' The public consultation on the forum should last six weeks, after which it's hoped that the council will 'designate' (i.e. formally recognise) the forum, which would then move ahead and come up with a neighbourhood plan. This would be voted on by those within the forum area in a referendum.The Acton Main Line Neighbourhood Forum have a web site and a Twitter account (@ActonMLNF) and are delivering a leaflet outlining their ideas to every household inside their proposed boundary. You can register your interest in the Acton Main Line Neighbourhood Forum online. Twitter: @ActonMLNF    Email: Neighbourhoodforum24@gmail.com

Martin Cain ● 3804d1 Comments ● 3802d

WARNING - DON'T ASK A TRAFFIC WARDEN !!!

One would assume that a Civil Enforcement Officer(Traffic Warden) would be aware of parking regulations and restrictions after all they are employed by Ealing Council to uphold the law. Thinking this was the case my husband asked the Traffic Warden's advice because he was aware that a yellow sign some way along the road stated that suspension was in force between Bay 1 and Bay 7.  The Traffic Warden asked ‘Where are you parked?’ and when my husband pointed to the bay where his car was parked the warden responded with the words ‘OK You are all right there’ so feeling assured my husband left the vehicle a few minutes before 2pm. So you can imagine how annoyed and confused we were to find a parking ticket on the windscreen timed at 2pn exactly!There is absolutely no way we would have parked in that location if there was any doubt about whether or not it was breaking the law.We looked around to try and locate the Traffic Warden in question but of course we could not see any warden around.  Counting the bays we thought we were in Bay 8.  According to the council the first bay is not counted as it is loading/unloading only. Perhaps the Traffic Warden made the same mistake - who knows. If he was unsure why not say it is up to the driver to double check? Why would the warden tell my husband that it was fine to park in that bay if that is not the case?  It is very unfair that my husband then received a parking fine within minutes even though he checked with the traffic warden before parking in that bay.  Perhaps it would be better if Ealing Council actually marked out which bays are affected to prevent people getting unfair parking fines, and by the way the suspension sign  was quite a few yards along on a lamp post. It should be located at the start and finish of the restricted area.On a later visit we spoke to 2 wardens who just said we sould have got the badge number of the person who said it was fine to park where we did. It seens you cannot even trust a Civil Enforcement Officer who is employed by Ealing Council to give the correct advice!We appealed of course but the Parking Services are sticking to their guns. Easy money for the council I guess, once again the motorist is fair game.In the past when each bay had a parking meter it was easy to check whether or not it was OK to park in that bay, now there is no beginning or no end and left up to the motorist to try and figure it all out. So my advice folks is NEVER take advice from a Traffic Warden, in fact don't even park in a road which has a sign saying some bays are suspended. Unless of course you want to pay a £55.00 fine!

Jean F Fernandez ● 3814d8 Comments ● 3811d

Future of housing associations inquiry launched

The Communities and Local Government Committee is holding an inquiry into the viability and sustainability of housing associations. This inquiry looks at the proposed extension of Right to Buy and how this and a number of other government measures may impact on the ability of housing associations to build and develop.• Inquiry: The housing association sector and the Right to Buy• Communities and Local Government CommitteeThe Housing Bill, to be published later this year, will enable the extension of the Right to Buy to housing association tenants, giving them the ability to buy their homes at a discount. Chair's comments: Clive Betts MP, Chair of the Communities and Local Government Committee, said:"Providing people with a roof over their heads, and ensuring more homes are built, are central to our nation’s future. Uncertainty around the extension of the Right to Buy scheme, and issues arising from the impact of welfare reforms and from changes announced in the Budget, raise real questions about the future sustainability of housing associations. Our inquiry will examine the effect on housing associations, and particularly their ability to house their tenants and invest in building new homes, of government policies, including the extension of Right to Buy and the reduction in rental income announced in the Budget."Written submissions The Committee is seeking evidence on the following points:Proposals on the Right to BuyThe type and quality of housing stock covered by the extension.The geographical distribution of housing association properties covered by the scheme.What the effect on the availability of affordable homes will be, and whether any projections have been carried out.The steps that could be taken to minimize the effect on the availability of social housing.The ability of those eligible for the policy to buy their own homes and keep up mortgage repayments.The availability of financial education for prospective buyers, including advice to prospective leaseholders about their responsibilities for paying for major works.The approach of mortgage lenders to the scheme.Proposals for the replacement of the homes sold, including the proposal for funding replacement through the sale of council homes in high value areas.Lessons learned from the earlier experience of the Right to Buy, including the experience of Scotland.Proposals in the BudgetWhat the effects will be on housing associations of the cap on rents.What the effects will be on housing associations of changes in housing benefit for younger people.What the effects will be on housing associations of other proposals in the Budget.Welfare reform proposalsWhat the effects have been on housing associations of changes to the welfare system in the last Parliament.What the effects will be on housing associations of the proposed changes to the welfare system.Other issuesThe role of the Regulation Committee of the Homes and Communities Agency.The accounting consequences for the national debt of the government’s proposals.Deadline for submissionsWritten submissions should be sent by Friday 28 August 2015. Send a written submissionGo To: http://www.parliament.uk/business/committees/committees-a-z/commons-select/communities-and-local-government-committee/inquiries/parliament-2015/housing-association-sector-and-right-to-buy/commons-written-submission-form/

Martin Cain ● 3819d0 Comments ● 3819d

Double Protest

In the interests of efficiency and democracy tonight I had the dubious pleasure of attending two protests outside the Town Hall at the same time. By far the biggest protest(300) was against the allocation of the entire voluntary sector older peoples services budget for the next 3.5 years to one organisation, Southall Neighbourly Care. Age UK Ealing's consortium including Southall Day Centre has been left with no funding from Ealing. This will have an immediate and severe effect on services to Ealing's older people. There was no paper information available from Ealing's award winning press office to explain this "strange" decision. I choose my words with care.The other protest was against the decision without debate, facts or discussion to award every household in Ealing with two yes two wheelie bins. This award was in recognition that my current recycle rate is approaching 100%. I can't think why I was protesting. It is a brilliant decision by cabinet to clutter the pretty streets of our borough. They don't like democracy and neither do you sorry do I. Let's just scrap ordinary councillors because they and we were not involved in this discussion and the award winning press office that tells us nothing and just let cabinet run the caboodle under the radar. And don't anyone dare say it is in cabinet papers without providing me with a precis in hard copy. Julian get those slabs of rock out and get cabinet members chiselling. Just can't wait for the next authoritarian surprise from the mountain. Or do you make do with Northalla Fields?

Arthur Breens ● 3842d3 Comments ● 3836d

Alice Gross Inquest

Perhaps I am too much in thrall to conspiracy theories, but does it strike anyone else as suspicious that a file has been lost by the coroner in this case and this seems likely to put the whole inquest into limbo?Firstly, why were Alice's parents not informed of this earlier?  The file was supposedly lost in November and it is now late July.Secondly, why is whatever information the file contained not retrievable?  Was it not copied or scanned in case of loss?  Was there only one copy extant?  If so, surely this is very careless?This is terrible for Alice's parents.  They are entitled to a full inquiry into the circumstances of their daughter's death.It has always seemed somewhat suspicious to me that the chief suspect for this crime so neatly took his own life, thus obviating the need for any further police enquiries.  It is not beyond the bounds of possibility that others, as yet unknown, were involved.  What better way to ensure a man's silence than to hang him in a place where the body will be very difficult to find and advanced decomposition will have taken place before it is discovered? Lastly, if everything took place as we have been led to believe, why did no-one stumble across Zalkalns as he was committing the crime?  The canal towpath and Fitzherbert Walk are reasonably busy as a short-cut to/from Brentford.  How can he have muffled her cries or hidden her body without detection?What do others think, or am I alone in my suspicions?

Thelma Leach ● 3843d6 Comments ● 3840d

Planning Manager - wrong in law again?  (TVU case)

Once again (please see the other posting re. the Hanwell case), the new Planning Manager directly acting for Head of Planning, Aileen Jones, has expressed a legal opinion, which it seems at the least is highly misleading if not simply wrong!In the TVU Ealing case, a certain area of land was required to be landscaped after demolition of all existing structures and the Council imposed a planning covenant on the burdened land to ensure this would be the case. The TVU now want to breach the restriction in order to develop and build housing on the open land.Neighbours pointed out to the Council that there is a Legal Agreement in force imposing a covenant on the land which obviously precludes use of the same land for housing.  The Planning Manager, Adrian Harding, recently wrote to one of the neighbours asserting that a new planning permission would effectively override the terms of the existing Legal Agreement and thus it would cease to have any legal effect. Mr Harding cited a Prudential court case to support his assertion.Mr Harding wrote:"....the local planning authority is required to determine the submitted application in accordance with the development plan for the area and taking account of any other material considerations. The implications of existing restrictive legal agreements in respect of the determination of later planning applications has been considered by the Courts. In Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Sunderland City Council and Peel Investments (15/7/2010) the Courts found that the later grant of planning permission started a new chapter in the planning history of the site and that the earlier restrictions did not continue to apply. Therefore, if the local planning authority were to grant planning permission for the residential development proposed at the University of West London, having reviewed the proposal in the light of relevant development plan policies and all other material considerations, then the earlier legal agreement would no longer be of any effect. It is therefore not necessary for the University to formally apply to have the section 106 legal agreement removed....".But what Mr Harding did not say is that in the case he cites "Prudential Assurance Co Ltd v Sunderland City Council and Peel Investments", the Agreement there specificially envisaged that a new development could displace the status quo and that the terms of the Legal Agreement would thus be rendered ineffective. As far as I know, this is not the case in the Ealing TVU Agreement.I have just received the following comment from Gerald Moran, Solicitor in Lincoln's Inn on the assertion by Mr Harding and disputing it:"By clause 2.2 of the section 52 agreement there was an obligation that within a certain timescale the Developer (or its successor) would carry out landscaping in accordance with planning condition 8 "and thereafter retain such landscaping to the satisfaction of the local planning authority". Presumably it was thought than an agreement binding the land about this would add something to the requirement of planning condition 8 for replacing trees or plants which die or are removed within the first five years etc.Doubtless the development envisaged now is inconsistent with retaining the landscaping devised for the 1992 permitted development. It is understandable if the Council in its capacity as holder of the agreement may decide not to seek to enforce the obligation to certain landscaping that no longer satisfies a planning purpose.However, I do not go so far as Mr Harding who asserts that the section 52 agreement has ceased to have an legal effect. He relies on R o/a Prudential Assurance Co. Ltd v Sunderland City Council.  You will see at para.3 of the attached copy decision that clause 3 of the 1988 agreement made clear that, save for one exception, nothing in the agreement would prohibit or limit any development to be carried out in accordance with some future planning permission (on which the council would be able to consider the planning merits).  The Judge refers to this at para. 30 as being critical to the case and only capable of having one meaning.Although the 1992 agreement has the usual provision to make clear that it would not fetter the powers and duties of the council in particular as planning authority, I do not see anything to say that development under a new planning permission could be carried out even if inconsistent with some obligation under the agreement (such as permanent retention of landscaping)."The Judgment referred to can be seen at the following URL:https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/14377445/R%20Prudential%20v%20Sunderland.pdfThis is the second occasion that the new Planning Manager has given legal pronouncements that do not appear to be correct!  The problem is (as well demonstrated in the recent Hanwell case) that Members of the Planning Committee rarely question what they are being told by officers and hence serious mistakes can occur to the detriment of both neighbours and the local enviornment.

Victor Mishiku ● 4071d8 Comments ● 3865d

Neighbours Trees

Wonder if anyone can offer some advice – I actually no longer live in Ealing – I moved to Richmond four years ago but we don’t have such a forums to pose such queries on so I hope you’ll indulge an old Ealingite.I have the problem of a neighbours trees overhanging the rear of my garden – this isn’t my next door neighbours but a house in another road whose garden goes across the back of ours. The trees are enormous – very very high – with very big leaves. The problem is that they block the light to the back of our garden which causes the back of our lawn to die. Of course there are associated issues such as HUNDREDS if not thousands of leaves dropped in our garden at autumn, animals nesting in the tree (such as squirrels who have ripped the roof of our shed off!) etc but it really is the lack of light that bothers us – we only have a small garden so the lack of light making a third of it virtually useless is quite an issue. I have googled this issue and nearly all the websites say the same thing – that we can chop off branches etc as long as they only hang over our property, and that the owners can ask for these trimmings back (why?) and that the tree must not be damaged and we must only cut to our border etc etc. It also says to check that there is no preservation order on the trees (there isn’t) and they are not in a conservation area (they are not)If we are talking a few branches of some medium sized trees we would consider doing this ourselves, but this is certainly one for the professionals – this would need tree surgeons and would be quite a lot of work and so cost and I don’t see why I should pay for that. I have spoken to the council who has advised that this is a civil matter and something they would not get involved in.My intention is to go see the owners of the house/trees and ask if they are planning to do this work and explain my situation – I hope that this can be resolved amicably; but I also am trying to be forearmed and informed in case they simply refuse to do anything about it – does anyone have any experience or can advise whether legally I have any leg to stand on – I really don’t want to start incurring costs if it’s something I can’t win. Any info would be gratefully received

Trizia Fiorellino ● 3874d3 Comments ● 3874d

BMW Car Theft

I'm posting this as I just want to make readers aware of my recent car theft of a 2008 BMW 1 series.  This happened in Amherst Road on 30th April 2015 in the early hours.  The car was taken without keys, there was no broken glass and it was taken using a sophiscated mobile device to gain entry and drive off.  The police are aware of this method.I have copied a couple of articles below. Perhaps our theft could have been avoided.From http://www.honestjohn.co.uk/crime/bmw BMW had a significant security problem with some of its models produced between 2007 and 2011, which made them fairly easy to steal for high-tech criminals armed with the right electronic gadgets. Our data shows a higher than average rate of thefts for quite a few BMW models. The problem has been rectified in new BMW models and those with at-risk vehicles can have a security update applied free of charge at their local dealership. This is the likely explanation as to why the X6 sees such a high crime rate.It’s not all bad news for BMW, though – if you take all the types of crime across the board for all models the mean average comes out at slightly better than the average overall crime rate for all models – most BMWs have good alarm systems, which are enough to deter opportunists who want to take sat navs and other valuables. And another article from http://www.ealingtimes.co.uk/news/11437787.Letter_to_Editor__Thieves_have_new_way_of_stealing_your_car/     First published Thursday 28 August 2014 in Ealing TimesPLEASE could you make your readers aware of a car theft which occurred last night. My BMW was parked outside my house in Drayton Grove when it was stolen. It was taken without keys or any sign of forced entry (broken glass, etc), possibly by some sort of device that the police say criminals are using to deactivate your key when you try to lock it. The thieves then enter the car using some sort of re-programming method for a new key. I have chased it up with the police, who have simply told me: "It is probably on some shipping container going abroad." Please make Ealing residents aware of this new method of car theft. Dr Fatima Al-Ruhaimi, Drayton Grove, W13

Evelin Matley ● 3910d4 Comments ● 3910d

Planning Manager Misdirects Committee on Hanwell case

I was appalled to witness the new LBE Planning Manager attending Wednesday night's Planning Committee TWICE misdirect the Members of the Committee on how they may or may not vote on an application.Item 03 on the Agenda (my copy had no index!) was for a contentious proposed development in Hanwell at Nos.1 - 7 Clock Tower Mews in the Conservation Area. A previous similar planning application was refused in April 2014 by a differently-constituted committee prior to the May Election.The previous application having been refused for reasons of design and appearance, roof profile, etc   - it was not refused on grounds of overdevelopment.Ms Carolyn Brown spoke on behalf of objectors and also Elthorne Ward Councillor, Cllr. Yoel Gordon (a former Member of the Planning Committee) spoke against the development very forcibly and described the presentation of the developers' agent as "disgraceful" and worse!Then, the Planning Manager (who I had never seen before) introduced the item and straight away MISDIRECTED the Planning Committee by telling them that they could not decide the case on any other matter giving a new reason for refusal as the Committee would be fettered by the previous decision for a similar proposal where the grounds for refusal had been on design and appearance, etc.This is wrong in law and there is a landmark case (Chisnell) from  2005 where the High Court ruled that a Planning Committee is NOT bound by previous decisions and may decide an application on a different ground to that previously refused on, so long as they gave a reason for their decision.In this instance, several Members said that they were regretful that they were bound by this restriction (as they thought) and one Councillor said that it was an overdevelopment.The Legal Officer did not interject to correct what the Planning Manager had said, nor did the Assistant Chief Planning Officer, who was also present.The Committee duly passed the Application in the belief that they were prevented from making a finding of "overdevelopment".Later on during the same Committee Meeting when introducing another case, the Planning Manager did it again!  This time, I could not sit there in silence and I interjected myself saying "Totally Incorrect". I was told to keep quiet by the Chairman.NB. This is the second time that I had to interject  - at a previous Committee on 14th August 2013, the then deputy Chairman (Cllr. Chris Summers) made a similar mistake, BUT before voting, both the Legal Officer and another Councillor Edward Rennie acknowledged that I was right (having interjected from the public gallery) that the Committee is NOT fettered by past decisions and may look at any Application with fresh eyes. Naturally, the Committee will bear in mind previous decisions which are a material consideration to be taken into account but they are not necessarily a deciding factor or a veto on a different Committee considering a similar application afresh coming to a different conclusion.On Wednesday, after my interjection on the second instance of misdirecting the Committee, finally the LBE Legal Officer spoke up effectively to confirm that what I had indicated was correct. I would just add that whilst the first case was being discussed (during which the Legal Officer did not correct the Planning Manager), I hastily scribbled a note and passed it to one of the Committee Members (as I was seated downstairs to hear another case) to say that the "Chisnell" case Judge had ruled that a Planning Committee are NEVER fettered in reaching a decision and departing from a previous decision, so long as they give a reason for doing so.I think that my message was passed round to a few Councillors, but alas, none questioned the Legal Officer or the Planning Manager on this.  Later, during the Meeting, they all heard that I was right! V.Mishiku (The Covenant Movement)  28/11/14.

Victor Mishiku ● 4084d24 Comments ● 3911d

First Great Western station improvements

I received an email from FGW informing what's in it for me that they have now won their new franchise.The announcement from FGW on the station improvements that lie within the borough have been copied and pasted below. Ealing BroadwayMore seats as part of our programme to deliver three million additional seats across the network by December 2018; Introduction of a more modern fleet of electric trains for commuter services across London and the Thames Valley; Free on-train wifi; Eligible to bid for £2.2 million of community improvement funding; Continued funding for the local Community Rail Partnership to help improve services and encourage local rail travel; A suite of energy efficiency improvements to help reduce energy useSouthallMore seats as part of our programme to deliver three million additional seats across the network by December 2018; More frequent stopping services; Introduction of a more modern fleet of electric trains for commuter services across London and the Thames Valley; Free on-train wifi; Eligible to bid for £2.2 million of community improvement funding; A suite of energy efficiency improvements to help reduce energy useActon Main Line, Hanwell and West EalingIntroduction of a more modern fleet of electric trains for commuter services across London and the Thames Valley; Free on-train wifi; Eligible to bid for £2.2 million of community improvement funding; A suite of energy efficiency improvements to help reduce energy useDrayton Green, Castlebar Park and South GreenfordFree on-train wifi;Eligible to bid for £2.2 million of community improvement funding; A suite of energy efficiency improvements to help reduce energy useGreenford StationStation improvements yet to be announced (confirmed)Want to know more:https://content.firstgreatwestern.co.uk/greater-west/?utm_source=BAGWDM&utm_medium=DM&utm_campaign=BAGWcrm

Ben Owen ● 3952d0 Comments ● 3952d

Patient Records for sale???

I believe a number of GP's have been asked for the private medical details of their patients which may then be sold by the NHS to varius organisations such as Insuance, Banks and so on!A friend mentioned this was featured on breakfast TV last Thursday morning.If this is true (and I have no reason to doubt it) surely it is totally wrong to pass this private and personal information on to anyone let alone organisations who would obviously use this information for their own gain?My friend worked for 9 years in a hospital and she is absolutely astonished, and livid, to think that the NHS, or the Government, (whoever is responsible for such a crazy idea) could even consider this because NO-ONE is allowed to look at a patient's medical information, not even their family.A patient's medical record should be between them annd their Doctor, unless the patient gives permission for this information to be made available to another body.Visitors in a hospital are not even allowed to pick up the chart at the end of the patient's bed to read let alone handing this valuable data on to goodness know who else!Doctors won't give results of tests to a spouse or partner, and that's how it should be. Where do we get a say in all this?The governmet are not to be trusted with all this innformation, remember many cases of files going missing, information being left on trains or thrown in rubbish bins?Has anyone heard about this, and what do you think about it?I know the NHS needs more money but there must be better ways of raising it!

Jean F Fernandez ● 4376d30 Comments ● 3962d

Evening Standard article re local hospitals 24 March 2015

A&E's  GPs SPENT £13M ON CONSULTANTSOfficials leading a controversial GP-led shake-up of emergency and maternity care in West London spent £13.4million on consultants in 9 months, it was revealed today.The Shaping A healthier Future plan saw the closure of A&E's at Central Middlesex and Hammersmith Hospitals last September. Ealing Hospital's maternity department is due to close this year, and A&E's at Ealing and Charing Cross will be downgraded within years.A Freedom of Information request found that between April and December last year the GPs in charge of the reorganisaion awarded 22  contracts to firms including McKinsey, PwC, PA Consulting anf M&C Saatchi.Health campaigner Dr Louise Irvine said: "These figures cover only 9 months of the 3 years and more that the SAHF project has been running. Where is the value for money audit on work done by these consulatants to show what has been achieved for these millions?"A Shaping A Healthier Future spokeswoman said: "We are undertaking large scale improvements for our two million residents, including increasing access to primary care, joining up health and social care, improviung hospitals; and enhancing mental health services.To deliver these we often need a wide renge of specialist experience for a short period of time, which is what these external consultants provide."@RossLydallRoss Lydall Well, it's only money, eh folks???Health Editor

Jean F Fernandez ● 3968d3 Comments ● 3964d

CPZ abuse

Can it be a coincidence that the proposed CPZ changes reported on this website were slipped in a now barely circulated local newspaper, are proposals that best suit the employer of the same councillor responsible for parking ?I wonder if he is to be one of the recipients of said permits?This councillor and his chums and their somewhat distorting & underhand methods are nothing short of despicable.Every paying CPZ permit holder should have been clearly informed about the intentions of changes to the system. This should have been done in 'About Ealing' and/or emailing every CPZ holder which would contact the vast majority.If I get emails from LBE consulting me on all manner of proposals many of which are not relevant to me, why not one on something that is?It's a fiddle. It's seems also to be a rather characteristic technique of this councillor's employer, A2Dominion.  Are they pulling his strings?Just 25 permits near a station or shopping area will be enough to return some streets to the problems that led residents to sign up to a CPZ in the first place.It wholly undermines those who are paying already too much for all day zones which exist because of the risk of all day and part day parking.The original remit for CPZs in Ealing was as a service first and foremost to local residents.It was also not for profit and would never rise higher than the rate of inflation.This was reiterated again and again.  I know. I was one who attended many 'resident partnership' meetings with the then Labour administration when the CPZs were in their infancy. Zone C in particular.  " Any operating surplus will be ploughed back into the zones for improvements to roads and services"In any case, why are local registered GPs having to pay for permits? Why do they not have free permits for Zones that fall into their practice domains?In actual terms it costs nothing. A very poor justification and rather crass to use medics as an excuse to justify others most certainly not deserving.Why are full time unpaid carers paying for permits?Why are elderly over 80 not getting an allowance of free visitor permits?Businesses have had to pay top dollar if they happen to be based inside a CPZ.This hit sole traders and small businesses like small shops very hard and forced some out completely.This latest proposal is purely to suit this councillors employers at A2Dominion who no doubt will be paying for the permits from the large amount of taxpayers money they receive with no accountability.It is bad enough that a Council Leader has failed to explain a highly unorthodox arrangement with A2D over a property but to find another high ranking portfolio councillor also employed by the said company and behind a rather hypocritical change that undermines the whole ethos the CPZ scheme nothing short of shameless.It would not surprise me if they also get free permits.As others have mentioned, there really should be a rather full investigation, why is this not being pressed hard for?

Mark Kehoe ● 3994d25 Comments ● 3978d

March smile

hree blondes were all applying for the last available position on the Texas Highway Patrol. The detective conducting the interview looked at the three of them and said, "So y'all want to be cops, huh?"The blondes all nodded.The detective got up, opened a file drawer, and pulled out a folder. Sitting back down, he opened it, pulled out a picture, and said, "To be a detective, you have to be able to detect. You must be able to notice things such as distinguishing features and oddities like scars and so forth."So saying, he stuck the photo in the face of the first blonde and withdrew it after about two seconds. "Now," He said, "did you notice any distinguishing features about this man?"The blonde immediately said, "Yes, I did. He has only one eye!"The detective shook his head and said, "Of course he has only one eye in this picture! It's a profile of his face! You're dismissed!"The first blonde hung her head and walked out of the office.The detective then turned to the second blonde, stuck the photo in her face for two seconds, pulled it back, and said, "What about you? Notice anything unusual or Outstanding about this man?""Yes! He only has one ear!"The detective put his head in his hands and exclaimed, "Didn't you hear what I just told the other lady? This is a profile of the man's face! Of course you can only see one ear! You're excused too!"The second blonde sheepishly walked out of the office.The detective turned his attention to the third and last blonde and said, "This is probably a waste of time, but...." He flashed the photo in her face for a couple of seconds and withdrew it, saying, "All right, did you notice anything distinguishing or Unusual about this man?"The blonde said, "I sure did. This man wears contact lenses."The detective frowned, took another look at the picture, and began looking at some of the papers in the folder. He looked up at the blonde with a puzzled expression and said, "You're absolutely right! His bio says he wears contacts! How in the world could you tell that by looking at his picture?"The blonde rolled her eyes and said, "Well, Hellooooooooooooo! With only One eye and one ear, he certainly can't wear glasses."

Graham Weeks ● 3982d0 Comments ● 3982d

Kuznia Smaku restaurant, a review following an unexpecrted visit.

Last Thursday night I had a sublime experience at the Kuznia Smaka Restaurant on the South Ealing Road. On an off-chance in rather too-grubby clothing from the garden I decided that I needed a civilized meal out. The South Ealing area does not have the gastronomic quality that it used to. Usually I limit myself to the Zayka Indian restaurant where I have experienced over twenty years of invariably excellent food and friendly and tolerant service. Last night I wanted something a little more rarefied and not-quite-as-exciting. Eating in the Kuznia Smaku was just like dinner at home when I was child (from my name you will have realized that although I am a born Englishman, I have Polish roots from my Polish parents who fought in the Allied Eighth Army North Africa and Italy during the Second World War (after being imprisoned by the Russians in the Lubjanka and in Siberia itself, etc., etc.)). It was re-assuring to discover that the quality avant-garde Polish cuisine that as available at the Kuznia Smaka indicates that Polish haute-cuisine has retained its integrity over the past thirty or forty years. The meal that I had consisted of (in English translation): a soup as a starter consisting of a clear broth/consomme with vermicelli, for the main course I had a chicken-loin-strip fritter (which is about the highest quality of chicken that you can obtain) with side dishes of new potatoes with dill and a cucumber/yogurt cucumber salad which is known “mizeria”. For desert I had a portion of Polsih cheesecake. With the meal I had two pints of Polish “Lech” beer a cup of white coffee and a glass of tap water (for my effervescent Vitamin C and Zinc tablet). This meal cost me £32.50. The last time that I had encountered the chicken-loin-strip-fritter in this form was in the dining room of the Hotel Warszawa in Warsaw in the 1970s. If memory serves the quality achieved by the Kuznia Smaka last night is the same as the Hotel Warszawa in its Communist heyday in the 1970s, and slightly better than how my late Mother made it. Mark Laskowski.

Mark Laskowski ● 3992d5 Comments ● 3983d

Would you like to be Julian Bell's new flunky?

See link to job advert: www.w4mpjobs.org/JobDetails.aspx?jobid=49828. Copied and pasted below as well. Of course if Cllr Bell did his job for Ealing full time he would not need to pay someone the thick end of £45k plus pension contributions to help with "drafting and developing policies". Good job the Council is not having to make any service cuts at the moment eh?Head of the Leader's OfficeWorking For:Ealing CouncilLocation: LondonSalary: £42,951 - £44,766 PA inclusiveJob Details:Work at the heart of Ealing Council.Ealing Council is improving the support it provides to the leader of the council and cabinet by creating this new role. This post will be part of the new strategy and engagement directorate, based within the chief executive’s department which also includes the council’s marketing and communications and policy functions.This new role offers an exciting and challenging opportunity within a high-profile area, where you will provide strategic support to councillors to ensure that corporate priorities become reality.You will work closely with the chief executive and senior officers drafting and developing policies as well as engaging with our partners and the community. You will need to carry out relevant research and keep abreast of trends and developments in local government.As the first person to be appointed to this new position, it is a great opportunity for you to make your mark in a high-profile role.You will be directly supported by the leader of the council’s executive assistant and an apprentice.We are looking for someone with experience of working with senior managers who has solid research and report writing abilities. You should also be able to draft strategies and policies and be a strong communicator.You should be a highly motivated individual with good organisational and administrative skills as well as excellent judgement.Please note that this post is politically restricted and subject to Ealing’s enhanced vetting process.Closing Date: 9 March 2015Interview/Start Dates:Interview date: week commencing 23 March 2015.

Vlod Barchuk ● 3992d4 Comments ● 3992d

The Can of Worms that is A2Dominion

So the wall of silence over Cllr. Bell is more than coincidence?  Cllr Mahfouz works for them as well. Just who else in LBE and LBH work for this tarnished Housing Association.This Housing Association which has deregistered as a Charity is a disgrace.Huge salary hikes for it's directors and executives, appalling conditions and treatment of tenants and managed tenancies, poor quality fault ridden older housing stock, poor quality new build housing stock, employment for the politically involved and favours for affilliated 'pals'Management that has persistently evaded questions from MPs and resisted Grant Shapps suggestion that they ought to be open to FoI questions as they are quaffing £millions in taxpayers subsidies and grants.It's not just Ealing Councillors, Hounslow seems to have several cosy relationships as well.Hillingdon though have wised up to A2D and are investigating some of their activities.The Car Parking fiddle comes as no surprise as the 'leaning on' of LBE Highways staff over footway and road issues over A2D new building as well as the waving through of planning permissions  came from people with vested interests has been rumoured for quite a while.From all the stories leaking out about A2D it's apparent that this organisation is clearly corrupt and is the corruptor, with far too many politicians in their grubby palms.A complete and open investigation is needed and any councillor associated fiscally or otherwise needs to be suspended and fully investigated.

Anthony Waller ● 4009d4 Comments ● 4006d

Oscar winning director endorses brand new film enterprise ‘Hattie’s Club’

Hattie’s Club is set to bring the West London community together, with its inaugural screening of multi award winning film “12 Years a Slave”.  Hattie’s club launch night will be Wednesday 18th February, at the Victoria Hall, Ealing Town Hall,London,W5Steve McQueen has not only personally endorsed this screening, he has collaborated with Priscilla Mensah (founder of Hattie’s Club) in writing a poignant letter to be read out, on the night.  This will undoubtedly add great sentiment to this debut event. Choosing Ealing as a venue for the launch was a no brainer with its rich heritage of film making stemming from Ealing studios. It is also particularly significant as both Steve McQueen and Priscilla Mensah both come from the Queen of the suburb’s. Acknowledging the work of Steve McQueen and his heart wrenching but inspiring story of Solomon Northup was the  most fitting way to launch Hattie’s film club in Ealing Hattie’s Club will meet monthly and promises exciting and interesting forthcoming events and themed evenings in different locations in Ealing and surrounding boroughs. Hattie ’s club plans to screen a diverse collection of films both mainstream and independent. Steve Mc Queen has kindly provided signed posters of the film. These will be the special prizes to be drawn in a raffle draw on the night.All ticket sold have a unique number and these will be automatically entered into the draw.  A donation from the screening will be going to Ealing Food bank and Great Ormond Street Children’s hospital. To add, ‘Hattie’s Club is on the lookout for up and coming film directors seeking to promote their films to a new audience.  So aspiring McQueen’s, apply within!Door open at 19.15pmTickets can be purchased at www.eventbrite.co.uk /screening of 12 years a slave

Priscilla Mensah ● 4013d0 Comments ● 4013d

A Christmas Message

MESSAGE FROM THE SULTANAH OF JOHORE Highly educated, from Oxford University. Open minded and full of logic and compassion. Her understanding of Islam, and respecting Christianity and other religions is an eye opener for those politicians who played the religious and racial cards to divide and rule.RAJA ZARITH IDRIS (Sultanah of Johore)Season of goodwill MIND MATTER by RAJA ZARITH IDRIS (Sultanah of Johore)If Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Isa (Jesus), a prophet respected and revered in Islam, is it so wrong to wish a blessed day for those who celebrate it?DURING the days before Christmas last year, I wished my friends who were celebrating it "Merry Christmas" in much the same way they would wish me "Selamat Hari Raya" or "Happy Eid".I find it rather sad that such a simple greeting – one which I grew up with and which I have never regarded as something that would compromise or de-value my own faith – is now regarded as something so religiously incorrect for us Malaysian Muslims.When I was at boarding school in England , I had to go to church every Sunday because it was part of the rules. My father advised me to consider it as part of my "education" and he had no doubt that the experience would strengthen rather than weaken my own faith.I was able to see the similarities and differences between Christianity and Islam. I learned more than the average Malaysian Muslim would about Christianity. I learnt that just as we Muslims categorise ourselves according to the four different schools of thoughts of the four Imams (Imam Malik, Imam Al Shafi, Imam Abu Hanifa and Imam Ahmad Abn Hambal) and are either Sunnis or Shias, so Christians too are divided into different sects or churches.Going to church did not make me less of a Muslim when I was a young girl, and neither does saying "Merry Christmas" make me less of a Muslim now. My faith has not been shaken just because I wished some friends a time of joy with their families. Neither will I suddenly suffer from amnesia and forget what my religion is.What I do not wish to forget, however, is that there are good, kind people who are not of the same faith as me.As Harun Yahya, the Turkish writer (he was selected last year as one of the 500 most influential Muslims in the world by the Royal Isla mic Strategic Studies Centre of Jordan ) noted: "Islam is a religion of peace, love and tolerance".Today, however, some circles have been presenting a false image of Islam, as if there were conflict between Islam and the adherents of the two other monotheistic religions. Yet Islam's view of Jews and Christians, who are named `the People of the Book' in the Quran, is very friendly and tolerant."This attitude towards the People of the Book developed during the years of the birth of Islam. At that time, Muslims were a minority, struggling to protect their faith and suffering oppression and torture from the pagans of the city of Mecca . Due to this persecution, some Muslims decided to flee Mecca and shelter in a safe country with a just ruler. The Prophet Muhammad told them to take refuge with King Negus, the Christian king of Ethiopia . The Muslims who followed this advice found a very fair administration that embraced them with love and respect when they went to Ethiopia . King Negus refused the demands of the pagan messengers who asked him to surrender the Muslims to them, and announced that Muslims could live freely in his country."Such attitudes of Christian people that are based on the concepts of compassion, mercy, modesty and justice, constitute a fact that God has pointed out in the Quran."I do not wish to be a self-centred Muslim who expects friends of other faiths to wish me Selamat Hari Raya or, for those who are not Malaysians and therefore do not know about Hari Raya, a Happy Eid and yet do not return their goodwill when it is Christmas, Chinese New Year, Deepavali or Vesak Day.Every year, friends who are Christians, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs or those without any faith come to our home to celebrate Hari Raya with us. They do so with sincerity and as a mark of respect for one of the most important days in the Muslim calendar. Why should we not reciprocate their kindness, show them the same mark of respect for their religion and wish them the same joy on their holy days of celebration?An Islamic scholar and lecturer also reminded me that as Muslims we must remember the importance of both the five Pillars of Islam and in the six Pillars of Iman (Faith), which are:Belief in Allah;Belief in the angels;Belief in the revealed Books (which include the Bible, the Torah and the Holy Quran);Belief in the Prophets (May Peace be Upon Them);Belief in the Resurrection and the events of Kiamah, the Day of Judgement; andBelief in the predestination (Qada' and Qadar) by Allah in all things.The prophets include not just Muhammad (May Peace Be Upon Him) as the last prophet and as the Messenger of Islam, but also in the 24 earlier ones who are mentioned in both the Bible and the Quran. Four of them are Ibrahim (Abraham), Musa (Moses), Daud (David), and Isa (Jesus).So, if Christmas is the celebration of the birth of Isa (Jesus), a prophet respected and revered in Islam, is it so wrong to wish a blessed day for those who celebrate it?We are now in the second decade of the 21st century. Surely, we should, now more than ever, be far more enlightened at a time when information of any sort and of all kinds are so readily available to us.What is most important is that we regard one another as fellow citizens and treat each other with respect, regardless of our race or religion. The writer is Royal Fellow, School of Language Studies and Linguistics, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), and holds a BA (Honours) degree in Chinese Studies, University of Oxford .[The writer is also the current Sultanah of Johor]

Jean F Fernandez ● 4062d1 Comments ● 4062d

Choose the right care this Christmas

People in Ealing are being encouraged to choose the right care for their needs this Christmas to help ease pressure on NHS services.Many common winter illnesses and injuries, such as colds and flu, can be treated at home with a well-stocked medicine cabinet containing:Paracetamol and ibuprofen for pain relief Decongestants for cold and flu symptoms such as blocked noses or sinusesTablets or liquids to help with heartburn and other digestion problemsAntiseptic wipes for cuts, grazes and minor woundsRehydration remediesA thermometerPlasters and sterile dressingsAntihistamines Your local pharmacist can provide professional, confidential advice and treatment without an appointment. You can see a pharmacist for a range of problems including coughs, colds, skin conditions, aches and pains, and stomach complaints or emergency contraception. They may prescribe you with over-the-counter remedies and will be able to advise on medicines that are safe to use with any other medications you are already taking.There are a number of pharmacies open in Ealing over Christmas. Click on the link below for more information. http://www.ealingccg.nhs.uk/media/13005/Ealing%20Pharmacy%20Christmas%20rota%202014.pdfIf you’re still unsure which care option to choose, NHS 111 is a round-the-clock phone service, free to call from landlines and mobiles. NHS 111 offers expert advice for situations when you need help urgently but it isn’t an emergency.The telephone team are fully-trained and supported by nurses, paramedics and other medical professionals. If they think you should see a healthcare professional, they will direct you to the correct service for your need, including GP practices that are open at weekends.Dr Mohini Parmar, chair of Ealing CCG, said: “During the winter months, an increase in winter illnesses and injuries puts additional pressure on health services, so it’s important to use your NHS wisely.“Self-care is important all year round but can be particularly essential during the winter months. It’s vital to drink lots of fluids to stay hydrated, and be sure to wrap up warm.“We would also encourage people to check in regularly with any neighbours or family members who might be vulnerable in the cold and the dark.“A&Es come under a lot of pressure at this time, so using services sensibly not only means that you will get the most suitable advice or treatment as quickly as possible, it also frees up emergency services for people with life-threatening illnesses or injuries.”

Louisa Elliott ● 4065d1 Comments ● 4063d

Ealing Council to cut £89 million over four years

While it comes as a shock that Ealing Council is going to have to make cuts amounting to £89 million over the next four years I cannot but hope it will be somewhat more humane than during the last round of cuts that saw the closure of so many facilities for the sick and disabled, not to mention the bizarre attack on thr  borough library network that underpins the very fabric of Ealing.If cuts are to be made I would hope that a more humanistic approach, rather than a pride-driven approach is taken. I cannot see how Ealing can justify cutting a single care worker, however, I can think of several non-essential acitivities that could be pruned that are of somewhat lesser value than the effect that a single care worker on the well-being of needy people, for example:*To abolish the honorary and non-political or administrative office of the mayor of Ealing along with the deputy mayor, full time administrative staff, office space, and cars.*To abolish the Ealing Council Events Department, as however nice having free or subsidised entertainment may be it is not essential to the quality of life of people relying on welfare and care services.*To leave the appalling recycled plastic bottle Christmas Tree in storage and not put it up outside the Town Hall ever again saving on labour and admin and of course power.*To not put up unnecessary civic Chrismas decorations and to not proliferate these into new areas of the Borough saving on electricity and also reducing Ealing's carbon footprint for the electricity saved.*To rent out under say 20 year leases (as I am loathe to see beautiful historic civic buildings sold off) the old Town Hall and the so-called Pitxhanger Manor in Walpole Park (perhaps it could be to somebody like the YMCA who could provide much-needed temporary social accomodation).*To stop wasting time effort and money on ridiculous posturing like creating a virtual National Park of London.These are things that come to mind that would "save a care worker" from being cut if people are prioritised above political posturing.

Neil F. Weber ● 4100d45 Comments ● 4096d

October smile

An Irish MiracleMurphy drops some buttered toast on the kitchen floor and it lands butter-side-up.He looks down in astonishment, for he knows that it's a law of nature of the universethat buttered toast always falls butter-down.  So he rushes round to the presbytery to fetch Father Flanagan.  He tells the priest that a miracle has occurred in his kitchen.  But he won't say what it is, so he asks Fr. Flanagan to come and see it with his own eyes.He leads Fr. Flanagan into the kitchen and asks him what he sees on the floor."Well," says the priest, "it's pretty obvious. Someone has dropped some buttered toast on the floorand then, for some reason, they flipped it over so that the butter was on top.""No, Father, I dropped it and it landed like that!" exclaimed Murphy  "Oh my Lord," says Fr. Flanagan, "dropped toast never fallswith the butter side up. It's a miracle .Wait... it's not for me to say it's a miracle. I'll have to report this matterto the Bishop and he'll have to deal with it.He'll send some people round; to interview you, take photos, etc."A thorough investigation is conducted, not only by the archdiocesebut by scientists sent over from the Curia in Rome.No expense is spared. There is great excitement in the townas everyone knows that a miracle will bring in much need tourism revenue.Then, after 8 long weeks and with great fanfare, the Bishop announces the final ruling."It is certain that some kind of an extraordinary event took place in Murphy's kitchen,quite outside the natural laws of the universe. Yet the Holy See must be very cautiousbefore ruling a miracle.  All other explanations must be ruled out.  Unfortunately, in this case, it has been declared 'No Miracle' because they thinkthat Murphy may have buttered the toast on the wrong side!"

Graham Weeks ● 4134d32 Comments ● 4108d

Car Wash at TESCO at Gillette Corner

There was a thread on here recently about car valets. I posted on this about my reservations at using one off of South Ealing Rd and I think I mentioned the one at TESCO Osterely. Today I went against my better judgement and put the car in at TESCO Gillette Corner whilst I went to a meeting at SKY. So here I am issuing a WARNING to all to stay away from this place!!!!I returned after over 2 hours and was shocked at the state the outside of the car was left in. The "Main Man" came to me and said it wasn't finished and would be done in 2 or 3 minutes. Off I went to get a sandwich and 10 mind later returned to see the car still not done to a good standard and the bloke washing it starts arguing with me that these marks aren't down to him and won't come off. He slaps more polish on and what surprise with a little bit of effort we have an area of the car which is okay but the rest still naff. Then the killer....I noticed a huge scratch across the roof by the windscreen which was fresh and 1000% wasn't there before. Cue the "Main Man" returns and an almighty row kicks off with him accusing me of not wanting to pay. Apparently he's a professional and it's impossible to make these scratches with soap, water and a sponge. It didn't take long for the East European workforce to gather around giving me the folded arms and one eyed glare.It was only after I did one and insisted on paying for a crap job that it dawned on me.... The scratches where perfect arm length and would've been caused quite easily by a watch!!!!I'm still fuming but you've got no chance with these dogs so all I can do is warn as many people off as I can.DONT USE THE CAR WASH AT TESCO OSTERELY!!!!

Colin Goodman ● 4157d20 Comments ● 4127d

Gross family request - yellow ribbon removal

The official pages on Twitter and Facebook report that the Gross family would like the yellow ribbons to be removed - this is the text posted to the Facebook page yesterday:A message about Yellow Ribbons For Alice. The outpouring of love and support for Alice and her family since 28 August has been amazing. The yellow ribbons that have blanketed the area are enormously appreciated by the Gross family, and they have asked us to thank all the ribbon fairies on their behalf. Thank you from the bottom of our hearts. The sight of six thousand yellow ribbons worn by the runners, marshals and spectators at the Ealing Half Marathon was awe-inspiring. Each and every ribbon was made by hand with love, and we thank all concerned for their help and support. Thank you also to everyone, wherever you live, who has tied, worn or shared a real or virtual ribbon. Your support has brought comfort in these dark days, and you have done us all proud. Our yellow ribbons have been a symbol of all the best in our fantastic community. They have raised awareness of Alice’s disappearance and they have conveyed the hope of her safe return. For the last week they have served as a mark of respect following the heartbreaking news of her death. Now the time has come for us to take down the yellow ribbons. We and the family should be grateful if you could please help to take them down over this weekend. However, the ribbons, flowers and tributes at the Hanwell clock tower can remain for now. Thank you. On behalf of the Gross family the administrators of the Find Alice Gross Facebook group should like to thank each and every one of you for your continued, wonderful support. It means so very much to all of us.

Guy Edema ● 4134d0 Comments ● 4134d

The Chef's Protege - anyone seen it?

Is this programme the most damning indictment of the UK's education system ever? My wife and I just started watching this programme, catching up on episodes from the last month or so. For anyone who hasn't seen it, Michel Roux Jr, Theo Randall and Tom Kitchin go back to the catering colleges where they trained, to try to find a young protege to mentor. What they find has me totally astounded: -A 3rd year student (3rd year at catering college!) who cannot make scrambled eggs without a microwave. She has a long think about it, but after coming up blank, has to be instructed as how to make them in a pan, with which she then fails abysmally. -A 3rd year student who didn't know that olives had stones in them-A 2nd year student who didn't know to add oil to a pan to fry something, tried to dry fry mushrooms. -A student (I forget which, but 2nd/3rd year) who'd had a risotto once, when her Mum made it. -None of them had made pasta before, including a 2nd year who claimed never to have encountered Italian food. Now at the age of 18/19, I certainly wouldn't have claimed to be the best or most knowledgeable chef, but if I'd sent (& paid for) my kids to go to catering college I'd expect them to know these things within the first day/week, which makes me wonder what the hell do they do there? What DO they learn about? Anyone been to one, who could enlighten me? Or is it just the path of least resistance to get some sort of qualifications? What makes it worse is that the candidates put forward for the show were the colleges' most promising students supposedly!!

Philip Slater ● 4158d10 Comments ● 4154d

{press release} new protest group over draconioan Ealing Policy

Press Release distributed to various media outlets this week:- Local man refuses to have his kerb dropped until Ealing Council reviews their draconian policy on dropped kerbsMany people feel restrictions set by the Ealing Council on Driveway Crossover / Dropped Kerb is completely ridiculous.  Now they have set up a pressure group and are lobbying for change.Sometimes laws and regulations are hardly well thought out at all and seem to be created by politicians who are completely divorced from the real world.  According to a new pressure group recently launched in Ealing, that's exactly the case with the Ealing driveway crossover / dropped kerb restriction.  They've decided to take it to social media and the press and demand the restrictions are modified to something more sensible.1 man in particular Mohamed Alwakeel (the spokesperson for the new group) refuses to implement a dropped curb on his property for his driveway until such time as this draconian policy is reviewed through Public Consultation, rather than the closed committees that usually decide on this policy. Mohamed has good ground to believe that his rights under the European Convention on Human Rights under article article 8 have been infringed by the pointless Council Policy. Beurocrats will tell you the policy is related to pedestrian safety as well as the look of the street, yet ask any member of the public and they will tell you they have never heard of anyone being hurt due to the pavement being dropped.  Mohamed strongly believes this policy should be dictated by public consulatation not meetings behind closed doors. Mohamed's next door neighbour has a dropped curb over 5 metres, yet no one has ever complained about it, or been hurt by it. Currently the maximum allocation for a single dropped kerb is 2.4m and 1 per household, irrespective of other factors.  The pressure group would like to see this changed to the 4.8 metres which is what the council would seize on the public road in order for allocation of 1 parking bay, be it for parking permit or disability etc.  Anything less is quite ridiculous. There should not be 1 rule for the council paying public and 1 rule for council beurocrats who wish to seize land on the public road.  Brent, a neighboring council for example has a maximum allocation of 4.8 for dropped curb and will even consider granting 2 dropped curbs if your home is wide enough, this is a much more reasonable policy. The group plans on continuing to voice their opinion until a change comes in effect.For more information or to join visit https://www.facebook.com/ealingcrossover.

mohamed alwakeel ● 4160d50 Comments ● 4154d

e-petition to Ealing Council to take tougher action against public drinking and associated litter

Please could you sign and circulate to your family and friends this e-petition to Ealing Council to take tougher action against public drinking and associated littering and anti social behaviour in Greenford and Perivale.  To sign the petition please follow this link: http://ealing.cmis.uk.com/ealing/ePetitions/tabid/96/ID/9/Consumption-of-alcohol-in-public-and-associated-littering-in-Greenford-and-Perivale.aspx The petition is open to be signed until 22nd September and states as follows: 'We the undersigned ask Ealing Council to actively campaign against public consumption of alcohol in Greenford and Perivale, to recognise the chronic increase in litter that public drinking is creating in the area from discarded beer cans, bottles, cigarette packets, plastic bags used to carry the drinking vessels and associated waste and the eyesore, public health hazard, including increased incidence of rats, and danger to wildlife that this litter creates in our streets, car parks, parks other public open spaces and private gardens. We ask the Council to recognise the unacceptable impact public drinking and associated antisocial behaviour from drunkenness is having on the lives of residents, including urinating and littering on private property and unwanted sexual advances to vulnerable residents. We ask the Council to act on these issues by: - launching a campaign with Council officers, Councillors and residents meeting public drinkers together with police officers, to increase the number and size of no street drinking signage;- creating an office in the Council specifically dedicated to cracking down on public drinking and enforcing the Controlled Drinking Zone; - increasing the numbers of litter bins in litter hotspots- sending letters to all households in the area informing residents that the Council is cracking down on public drinking;- working with the local police to ensure more is done to enforce the Controlled Drinking Zone and to reduce public drinking.'

Graham Weeks ● 4180d22 Comments ● 4156d

URGENT: Starlite Ballroom planning application

There is a revised planning application for the Starlite Ballroom, a venue that opened sixty years ago this year and hosted bands including the Who and Pink Floyd. Read more here: https://www.facebook.com/SaveTheStarliteGreenfordPlease help to save a precious asset for the whole borough by objecting to this application http://www.pam.ealing.gov.uk/portal/servlets/ApplicationSearchServletas soon as possible, mentioning some or all of the following points:- The Starlite Ballroom is an asset to the area, a UK music heritage site, the venue for some of the world's best known musicians, such as Jack Bruce, Eric Clapton, David Bowie and Jeff Beck.- It is the only large venue of its kind left in Greenford suitable for concerts, the stage at Greenford Hall is regarded as too high for that kind of event.- If restored it has the potential to stimulate regeneration in Greenford and the surrounding area, because its reopening would result in job creation and an increase in the general level of prosperity.- It has considerable potential for combined use as a combined community/arts centre and a commercial site, particularly because of its proximity to Sudbury Town Underground station. There is nothing of that kind in the area at the moment but there are successful examples of such projects such as Rich Mix London (http://www.richmix.org.uk/).- Residents have been asking for a local bus service connecting them with Ealing which would be justified and supported by the presence of the Starlite.- It is an unusual blend of pre-war and post-war Modernist architecture which reflects the changes in Greenford's architectural history. Its demolition would result in a loss of part of its local distinctiveness.- Having a prestige site like the Starlite on the doorstep on the doorstep is bound to lead to a rise in property values.- Its presence will stimulate local interest in heritage and attract tourist revenue, to the advantage of the borough as a whole. In January (16/1/2014, Vanessa Feltz Show, BBC 94.9) the Mayor of London said that there was potential for a music heritage trail through the borough - if there is nothing left to see there will be no point in creating it. Foreign tourists are already staying in the borough at hotels built in recent years.- If a block of flats replaces it there will be an increased concentration of residents needing more services, especially if they are bought to let and shared by multiple tenants, at a time when they are already stretched to breaking point.- It is highly likely that each new resident will own a car and as a result there could be a significant increase in the number of vehicles parked in the streets around it. Parking is already a problem there and fourteen off street spaces simply won't be enough. - Its use as a community centre would lead to an increase in pedestrian traffic, benefiting the small businesses around it.- New residents are more likely to do their regular weekly shopping at large supermarkets, rather than the small shops in its immediate vicinity.The whole of the borough of borough of Ealing has a tale to tell about the evolution of 20th century rock and blues, we already have events like The Hanwell Hootie and The Ealing Club has managed to retain its site at the Red Room in Ealing Broadway. If the council genuinely supports the preservation of local music heritage it must deny this planning application and support the Starlite.

Albertina McNeill ● 4196d3 Comments ● 4168d

IFTIKHAR FINALLY MADE A RACIST COMMENT

If you look at the context...it's racist.It's on the Brentford forum on the " gig is up " thread... his last post!"With out immigration, British society and economy would bleed to death. Britain is dying it natural death by aging population and low birth rate. Now the population would be replaced by Muslims.***    Did you forget how your white asses came on boats, robbed people of their wealth from colonies in East?   ***And killed and tortured them? Did you ´integrate´ then? You Britishers are-were nothing but thieves. Majority British population does not know its own history of crimes against humanity because your government there wants to regiment you with false propaganda and tell you bed time stories about your ´royalty´... who were, as I said, nothing but thieves. Whilst I agree that you have an immigration problem in this country, I don't think that this is your main problem. Your main problem is the disintegration of the family unit and the loveless binge drinking environment that your children are growing up in! NEVER in my life have I seen another country where people so seldom give their children a hug and a kiss like in this country and NEVER in my life have I seen another country where there are so many children from different fathers growing up in single parent households! Before you tackle the immigration problem (at least the immigrants LOVE their kids) you should first look at yourselves!"If I or anyone else would have used words like thieves, murderers and torturers... then referred to a specific skin colour there would be hell to pay would there not???If I had said that Muslims were brown arsed terrorists I'd be hung, drawn and quartered !!MODERATORS.... I WANT THIS MAN BANNED WITH IMMEDIATE EFFECT !

Andy Wright ● 4202d13 Comments ● 4192d

Skip Hire Company Experience

I'm not recommending or warning... you can make your own mind up.I had a ring around for an 8 yard skip on LBE licensed skip hire companies.By far the cheapest was PINKLEAFI booked a skip on the Friday to arrive first drop on the following Tuesday (they said allow 48 hours to spin permit around)Booked my labour in to kick off Tuesday and they began digging.Chased PINKLEAF up at 10.00am as no sign of skip -- they confirmed "on it's way"At 11.00am another chase to PINKLEAF.. "the driver is just having his tacheometer break around the corner from you - be there in 15 mins"So at 1.30pm yet another call.. got the classic "wagon has broken down"... could only laugh!!!3.00pm just for devilment we rang again and said look we've now got 4 blokes standing idle... "be there in an hour, if not it'll arrive tomorrow morning"So onto Wednesday. Rang PINKLEAF at 9.00am to ask what time today because the lads are back on site and cant do anything else until rubble cleared..... "there's no permit for that skip yet, we only applied for it yesterday - do our best to get you a skip tomorrow"Thursday.. no skipFriday.. no skipSaturday.. no skipSunday.. no skip (but we went to church to pray for one)Monday - we chased again and same old tired excuses as week before.Then on the Tuesday, a whole week later than promised, PINKLEAF delivered a skip!!! But they were just teasing us... the driver refused to drop it as he wanted a cash payment.. even though we'd paid up front on a debit card (believe me if we hadn't we'd been off elsewhere!!!). Finally he spoke with the office and dropped the holy grail.So we used the skip for a week and a half and I asked last Friday morning for the skip to be collected ASAP..PINKLEAF confirmed they'd try and collect the next day but more likely Monday.. fine I said but please ensure Monday as I didnt want the collection experience to be the same as the delivery. "No problem" said PINKLEAF.So here I sit on Friday evening after ringing PINKLEAF this morning and giving them what for about having a skip still on the road a week after asking for it to be collected and guess what? I still have a skip from PINKLEAF on the road taking up a precious parking space and attracting daily attention from do as you likeys and potential fly tippers.Despite PINKLEAF assuring me there "no problem - definitely collected today" or, as I said to her, just trying to get me off the phone.So that's my experience of PINKLEAF skips... God how I wished I'd stuck with Gowing & Pursey who've given me excellent service over the years.I'm not endorsing any Company or telling you who not to use in LB of Ealing, I'm merely giving you factual tale of my experience.I've not hired a skip since LBE changed the permit regime to make it the hire companies responsibility to get the permit. I'm not happy as it takes something out of your control and once you've committed with a company to get your permit your basically stuck as I see it.I did tell PINKLEAF I'd get onto the Council about this but I'm not sure it'll count for anything. The monthly permit does however run out next week so I'm toying with the idea of blocking the skip in and then reporting it so a fine gets issued but I'm not that small minded -- I just want this skip off the road!!!!Enter joke of your choice about "rubbish service"

Colin Goodman ● 4203d9 Comments ● 4199d

Niqab

The Quran tells us that it is best to follow the Prophets Sunnah. So if the wives wore hijab/ niqab & they were the best of woman & the prophet pbuh had a beard which is the best man ever to live then why wouldn't u want to follow the best people? And if u believe in the Quran it tells u numerous times to follow the prophets Sunnah so it's your own personal choice whether to do it or not!!! Unfortunately some sisters don't present the hijab in the best way but there are many sisters out there that are trying there best to be modest in there dress & behaviour in this evil society we live in. If you are truly a Muslim sister you will support your sisters with the hijab and not state by wearing the hijab we are covering our religion & our character from the rest of the world. Because this statement is completely not true I can put a covering on my head but not on my character!! Unless your talking about the niqab? Which is the full face covering that yr talking about! But even though I don't wear niqab I still choose to support these sisters because this is a choice they've made and I don't feel that the niqab changes they're character but rather they're facial expressions while communicating!!Wearing a hijab for these women represents what it is...modesty. Any rejection or provocation comes from bigotry. It is exactly the same as the thought that a woman in a mini skirt who gets raped asked for it. The modest head-covering which you see on statues and pictures of Mary, and that Christian women wore for centuries, and many still do, particularly orders of religious sisters? The most ironic thing about this, is that, Mary the mother of Jesus is always portrayed wearing a hijab, and further, the Bible contains a command instructing believing women to "cover their head or shave off their hair! " The head covering the Jewish women were required to wear is different from the head covering Muslim women are required to wear. I think they symbolized different things maybe. Please look at it and tell me what the difference in level of covering between Virgin Mary's clothing and the hijab? In all three religions it symbolizes the same thing 1 obedience to God's commands 2 Modesty and respect to women.People are offended by people walking down the road in head to toe bin bags. It's spooky. You have the right to feel offended. You do not have the right to stop them doing it.It is socially acceptable to be openly racist towards Muslims in this country. Legally not so because more and more Muslims are standing up to this fascism and rightfully so. What, values like stripping down to get sunburned on the beach and drinking to excess on a Friday night out? Why don't you just wear what you want and allow other people to wear what they want? The right to wear what you want is not a special privilege. Its a basic democratic right and one that you yourself enjoy. No one tells you what you can or cannot wear. Why do you think you can tell others what they should wear?These racist just don't like being pointed out and don't like to be exposed when challenged! So all in all, this university wanted to make a rule for less than 1% of the population who (I assume) aren't causing any big disturbances or anything? In regard of safety/terror issues, I'd be more worried about backpacks, but I doubt those will be banned in an university setting. Ban on Burqa/ Niqab is against religious-***-human rights of Muslim Women in Europe. Those who support ban on veil are Islamophobic.We live in a world were women are paid to be naked and fined to be covered, unbelievable! Sisters if you want to wear the niqab you do that. Inshallah you are rewarded for your efforts and commitment in the hereafter. A woman should be free to wear what she likes, if you going to ban a woman for covering up herself, please also ban woman that fail to cover up. The only people who will suffer are Muslim women. A ban would be unjust. One of the best things about this country is its tolerance. Let us remain tolerant.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4211d6 Comments ● 4210d

Halal Meat

Halal Meat Muslims say a prayer before they kill an animal. Christians say a prayer before they eat it. I'm not sure why either of these practices should be thought particularly offensive. How on earth does eating a piece of meat or poultry that has been slaughtered with a prayer equate to accepting or supporting a religious practice? Why are you so threatened if a person has said a couple of words in Arabic beforehand? With so much crap going on in the world it's ridiculous (and frankly embarrassing) that this is something of major concern to the extent that it is creating so many headlines. Granted, people should be told if they are eating halal meat, but the vitriolic responses are becoming increasingly disturbing. This is not about food standards, it is not about 'defending' a secular society, it is not about labelling or consumer rights or animal welfare. This is about the fact that some people just don't like Muslims.Slaughterhouses are businesses, they also have "the right to choose" to conduct and practice their business in whichever way they wish in order to maximise their customer base. Pizza Express and other restaurants also have "the right to choose" what their menu consists of, again in order to maximise their customer base. Both halal-compliant slaughterhouses and Pizza Express are doing just that, nothing sinister or malicious or untoward. You have the right as the consumer to choose what you buy/eat, sure, which is why it's important that products are labelled well and that, say, places which use halal meat say that they do. Which Pizza Express was doing anyway. This wasn't a secret, the company are pretty clear about it on their website and if this matters so much to you then surely in order to exercise your "right to choose" as a consumer and decide whether/not to eat there you have to actually go and do some research? If you want to be an engaged consumer you have to actually be an engaged consumer, you can't expect everybody to do it for you, you have to ask. When you buy a chocolate bar, do you expect somebody to rush up to you and say 'BY THE WAY THAT CONTAINS NUTS~!' or do you read the packaging?This is a story about lazy people who couldn't be bothered to act like engaged consumers and are horrified to find out that they were 'unwittingly' being given something they never asked not to be given in the first place. That is all it is.You guys can eat anything even pigs that roll in their own filth but you wont eat HALAL which is clean meat.  You know, the bible also says you shouldn't eat pork as it is 'unclean'.....just saying for all of you stating this is a christian country. Bit of course it's nothing to do with the meat, it's just another excuse to have a pop at Muslims isn't it. I for one am proud to live in a multicultural society and am glad that my child is growing up in one. I would hate for her to grow up as a little Englander with a hateful, narrow view of the world and frightened of anything even remotely different to her. Pork is banned in the christian religion. Read the bible and find out. Stop this vendetta against Halal meat......how many will get an Asian / Indian halal curry after a night Boozing! And as usual I bet the Muslim parents wouldn't have an issue with pork etc as long it was served n cooked separately to the Halal food which would also apply if catering for vegetarians and non vegetarians!! British Muslims have every right to be catered for. They are as British as the rest. I think people are worried in case the ritual prayers are in fact spells which will turn them all into Muslims. This week's row has got nothing all to do with animal welfare. The fuss is about people's fears over the covert Islamification of society. You may or may not agree that concerns are realistic or even legitimate, but food suppliers and others concerned ought not to deny that it is an issue or answer criticisms honestly. I don't think eating halal meat actually turns you into a Muslim. This time it is aimed at Muslims. However assaults on ritual slaughter have a long history in terms of European anti-Semitism. This is just more of the same, prejudice dressed up as concern for animal welfare. Taking lives, foods and shelters of others are cruelty, so, don't take meat, fish and vegetables  for food because they have lives. Don't milk animals because they are their babies food. Don't take drinks because they are the abodes of so many living creatures. Don't let mothers do breast-feeding because it harms their beauty.....Just be the champion of saints of mankind! "  - Do this words sounds funny? Hope, don't for those champions who are the modern advocates of "RIGHTS". Stunning is unethical. Stunning causes the animal SO much pain. Halal is HUMANE and CARING to the animal. Denmark is a country that SUPPORTS animal cruelty. Science has shown the Halal is peaceful. Science has shown that stunning causes animals PAIN and SUFFERING. Centuries ago people were more natural. Stop perverted GMO and perverted food practices. Islam is the best way of life.Birmingham school says sorry for serving non-Halal meat to Muslim pupils. Council catering staff had wrongly dished up the non-Halal food to Muslim pupils on December 12, but details have only just come to light. On Monday parents received a letter from Craig Jansen, head of the 1,400-pupil secondary school and sixth form, in which he apologised unreservedly for the incident. There are hundreds  of state and church schools where Muslim children are in majority. In my opinion, all such schools may be opted out as Muslim Academies so that non-Muslim children could enjoy their own meals in their own schools. IA London School of Islamics Trust    

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4281d47 Comments ● 4240d

It's Recycling Week but Reusing is Better....so here's some info:

http://www.ealing.gov.uk/info/200970/recycling_services/1611/re-use_collection_service"Re-use collection serviceFind a new home for your unwanted but good condition furniture and appliances with our reuse service for bulky items.Working in partnership with London Re-use Network we can collect items from your home to be passed on to vulnerable families.The items must be in good, clean condition and have the appropriate fire safety labels attached. The London Re-use Network will not accept broken, stained, ripped or torn items.Items which can be collected include:  BedsSofasFridgesWashing machinesTablesChairsComputersTelevisionsBicyclesHow to book a collectionOnline: www.londonreuse.comPhone: The London Re-use Network hotline on 0203 142 8506 (9am-5pm)The items will be collected from inside your property to keep them in good condition for re-use and to prevent damage by the weather or animals. Please ensure items are clean, have user manuals where possible, have safety labels attached, and have all pieces and parts.Collections cost £20 for 1-8 items, and £25 per fridge or freezer.Please check our full list of items which can be collected for more information.If you have large items to be collected that are not suitable for re-use you can use the bulky waste collection service."Don't forget the Charity Shops, and www.westlondonwaste.gov.uk  Some charities may collect free.Friends in North London shared a collection.  Why not see if you can do this if you do not have a full quota as per the description - bulky waste can be by the black bin liner full - check out bulky waste collection info.

Philippa Bond ● 4246d2 Comments ● 4245d

Trojan Horse

Trojan Horse Tahir Alam is allegedly the man behind a blueprint for the ‘Trojan Horse’ plot for the radical ‘Islamisation’ of secular state schools. An alleged plot to takeover some of Britain’s schools by Islamist extremists has been reportedly masterminded by a ringleader who had drafted a guide document on the process, a media report has said. Tahir Alam, chairman of governors at Park View school in Birmingham, is allegedly the man behind a blueprint for the so-called “Trojan Horse” plot for the radical “Islamisation” of secular state schools. He called for “girls [to] be covered except for their hands and faces”, advocated gender segregation in some school activities, and attacked a “multicultural approach” to collective worship, the Sunday Telegraph' reported. In his 72-page document, published by the Muslim Council of Britain in 2007, Tahir Alam and co-author Muhammad Abdul Bari categorically attacked many state schools for not being “receptive of legitimate and reasonable requests made by some Muslim parents and pupils in relation to their faith-based aspirations and concerns”. They described how Muslim governors could be activated to press the “views and aspirations of Muslim parents and the local community” on reluctant schools. Birmingham has a large Muslim population, nearly 22 per cent, according to the 2011 census. The “Trojan Horse” plot had come to light recently and involves the alleged takeover of secular state schools and the removal of secular head teachers in Birmingham by radical Muslim staff and governors. There are more Methodist schools than Muslim schools in England and 33% of English state schools are Christian. There’s been a big kerfuffle over a supposed Muslim influence on six schools in Birmingham, with outlets like the BBC and Telegraph alleging a “Trojan horse” takeover by Muslim parents. But whether you agree with religion in schools or not, the faith that is most clearly represented in Britain’s education system is Christianity. There are more Methodist schools (26 or 0.13%) than Muslim schools in England. Out of the total number of state-funded schools (primary and secondary) in England this is what percentage were Muslim in 2012. Some 0.06% or 12 schools are Muslim faith schools.  Out of all UK state-funded schools, 33.61% or 6751 schools are Christian. School segregation: 12% of state schools are split into boys and girls. Charges against the six schools in Birmingham include not teaching the curriculum, inviting radical speakers to talk to the children and gender segregating classrooms – to the detriment of girls. A small, but significant number of traditional British schools are split by gender too. The man accused of being at the centre of the plot, Faisal Khan, has denied the allegations, saying his sole motive was to improve the standards at schools and that he had no wish to “Islamize” British schools. British authorities are now investigating the alleged plot. UK Education Secretary Michael Gove appointed Peter Clarke, former head of Scotland Yard’s Counter Terrorism Command, to lead the probe. The appointment of Clarke has faced criticism, with critics saying the move has resulted in rising fears over a possible government crackdown on Muslim communities in the UK. There are concerns that the plan could prevent ordinary Muslims from getting involved in their children’s schooling affairs for fear of being branded extremist. “The idea that MCB document was a Communist or Trotskyite-type plot to takeover all Birmingham/UK schools is laughable. This feeds into a wider 'counter-jihadist' (Breivik, EDL, etc) narrative that Muslims want to "take over". To describe the handbook as 'a document on manipulating teachers and curriculum' or 'a detailed blueprint for the radical "Islamisation" of secular state schools', as Sunday Telegraph says, is an insult to the many thousands of professionals and lay people who have been involved over the last ten years in the massive improvements in the educational achievement of young Muslim people. There is a level of hysteria building which is not justified, we need to take the temperature down and politicians must not play with these issues or else face a potential backlash, possibly in community cohesion." Abdul BariThe whole saga is outrageous, beyond belief and frankly if it was not so serious, it would be comical. The documents on which this whole action is perused is false and as there is no proof of extremism in schools, Mr Gove has made it illegal for Muslims to have conservative views (coming from a minister of conservative government, its comical really). Feel like we are back in the fifties in the USA again. Michael Gove is an avowed Zionist which is not the best way to approach issues like this! Because it can lead greater attacks on Islam. It amazes me that on the basis of an anonymous letter the whole country has been lead to believe that there is an organised plot to somehow take over schools, now allegedly across the length and breadth of Britain! Furthermore the amount of coverage that this has received from the media as being a credible story, to me, suggests the level of Islamophobia in our society has reached alarming and dangerous heights. I would suggest that for the sake of fairness, equality and justice all schools are subject to the same level of scrutiny. For example Christian, C-of-E, Jewish and Hindu, Sikh schools. I believe that this not only a witch hunt but a move to tarnish and undermine the credibility of Muslims in general and the noble teachings of a widely practiced and rapidly growing religion which a people devotedly choose to follow. Islamophobia should be stopped - especially when the racist is a government minister or department. you must share this island with many people, why does it belong to one people? Grammar schools regularly carry out gender segregation, shall we remove those Head teachers too.  The horse in question, it is alleged, contained Muslim extremism – brought to state schools by stealth, by governor bodies launching subtle pincer movements, to remove the kind of pesky teachers who might object to the segregation of pupils by sex, or a refusal to stick to the syllabus. How incredibly extremist. Schools where segregation of pupils by sex occur. How different from boy's only Grammar schools and High schools for Girls that exist in predominately Conservative areas. And that exist predominately in the private school sector. It does though surely produce better exam results, as pupils are less influenced by the idea of 'girl's subjects' and 'boy's subjects', and are less likely to be distracted by sex. Allegations of an Islamic takeover plot of Birmingham schools are just the latest in a string of slurs against Muslims. It is not clear what is meant by an "Islamic plot takeover", and whether that is the same thing as saying or hinting that some Muslims might want to get some schools to adopt their particular version of Islamic religious values, behaviours and life-styles. If it is the latter, that would not necessarily be an indication of "terrorism", so I struggle to see the need for 'counter-terrorism' input. It is not terrorism in any way shape or form. It is important to remember this is not about Islam as such but yet another chance to bash people perceived as foreigners. To many Muslim is another word for immigrant and coloured person, two terrible bugbears. Why should an unnamed, undated, unspecific source has effected students, teachers, governors, parents in one swoop. It has serious implications on unfounded accusations for hundreds of people. In no way shape or form is this right, nor should have it EVER happened. Just by a anonymous letter how can you judge the schools and it is bringing such bad vibe to Birmingham schools and local Muslim community we feel like we're targets no matter how hard we try we will never please and move forward from the terrorist labelling. I am disgusted at the way these particular schools and governors were targeted for no reason other than being Muslim. No solid evidence wa available to substantiate these accusations which arose and yet such great weight and focus was attached to them. Morally unjust and utterly unacceptable. The Trojan Horse document was clearly written by someone who knows little about Birmingham and even less about Islam. It has chimed, however, with widespread Islamophobic fantasies and fears amongst non-Muslims, and as a result of unethical reporting in the media has done much damage. On the one hand we get told we are not integrating enough and we should engage more in civic society. On the other, when we do, we get accused of having sinister agendas. Since when do concerns by religiously conservative parents about teaching on homosexuality, girls and boys mixing, and the reciting of prayers, require anti-terrorist experts to get involved? Allegations of an Islamic takeover plot in Birmingham schools aren't justified by the evidence – and the government response is way out of proportion. Perhaps its best to let the Muslim community sort these issues out. These are in effect Muslim schools now. It is up to the Muslim community to see off hard liners (if there are any) otherwise it is their own children's' education that will suffer. I think it would be very difficult for non Muslims to get involved either as governors or management so perhaps that it is one of the reasons for the conflicts that have arisen. It may be best for the Government to but out providing the record of the school is O.K. from an exam point of view. I am so disgusted that even after it was proved there is no factual evidence or basis for that racist and hate filled document, schools in Birmingham are being subjected to this horrific ordeal and the name of many good reputable teachers is being tarnished... Why? Clearly viewable that this accusation has been purposely placed on these schools which surprisingly consists of majority Muslim children. Clearly the school policies are being contradicted by Mr Gove as they clearly state that it is the schools priority and job to meet the needs of the local community and of the students within the school. So if a school is doing that then what is the issue? What is happening feels like the persecution of a religious group. This is important because the wit hunt feeds Islamophobia. As we can see from the bombings and arson attacks on mosques in the UK, Islamophobia is a very dangerous and divisive form of racism. I'm sick of this hatred of Islam and Muslims. Haters, ignorant scum, look for any means to target Muslims, now even in our schools. It's a joke and this has to stop. How hypocritical does a country have to be to illegally invade Muslim countries and then accuse Muslims of terrorism? I am a Muslim. I am an anti-terrorist.   I never realised how racist and anti-Islamic this country is until I moved here. These people are here legally and have the right to live how they want to. Just because there are terrorists who use Islam as a doctrine to justify their hateful acts, does NOT mean that every Islam wants to change Britain to Sharia Law, kill the gays and put all women in burkas! These people are being judged and punished for the actions of others that have nothing to do with them, simply because they are of the same religion. Do you judge Germans in the same way because their country committed genocide? Or the Irish if they are from an area where religious conflict was particularly violent? No. Seems like thinly veiled racism to me, not the 'staunch upholding of British rights against religious extremists' as you all seem to espouse. What do people mean when they talk about 'multiculturalism'? If a lot of people come from a foreign country and settle in a particular area they will bring the culture of that country with them. Of course they will want their schools to promote their values. Gender segregation is everywhere in the Muslim world including in EU applicant, Turkey, so either we believe in Britain as multicultural or we don't. You don't get to pick and choose the bits you want. Why not sit down with parents and listen to their concerns, instead of ordering an investigation? Shocked at this terrifying witch hunt against Muslims who are simply trying to raise standards. Its totally unacceptable to create a furore in the country over anonymous accusations with no proof. Because it is a divisive move and will affect community relations. This is the very reason why society does not function properly, this is a deliberate attempt to spread fear amongst communities, as the best way to control a nation is through fear itself. because this is NOT ,,I repeat is NOT an Islamic plot to take over Birmingham, so DO NOT put false information in the media to put Muslims down!!!!! What next.....Muslims taking over hospitals, banks, pubs....come on... Tomorrow, a Pakistani MP would become the PM of GB and this does not mean that the country has become a colony of Pakistan.  What's taking place is an absolute disgrace. This whole witch hunt is putting Muslims off from becoming governors at a time when it is need the most. Why should Muslim parents be targeted when all they want at the end of the day is a good all round education for their children. Before Muslims governors came on to the scene all the inner city schools were doing poorly and failing all the children of the school. Muslim parents were criticised for their lack of involvement in their children's schools. Now they are being vilified. It is an absolute disgrace that an ex anti terrorist police office has been brought in to investigate the situation. It stinks of racism and the desire to label all Muslims into the category of extremist and jihadist. What a disgrace by the national and the local government. It's wrong for Gove to be deliberately politicising our Education system. All our children deserve respect and not to be scapegoated. What a total waste of tax payers money and tactical manoeuvre by Michael Gove to divert attention away from the real issues. Gove’s war is designed to destabilise governing bodies where Muslims form a majority. Don't want us to be part of 'big society'?  We totally reject the idea that there is Muslim plot to take over Birmingham schools. We abhor the scapegoating of the Muslim community being whipped up by the media. We call for the removal of Peter Clarke as we believe this is a provocative appointment, designed to divide our community. I don't believe that there is an Islamic Plot to take over Birmingham schools. It's a set-up. Anonymous complaints have been used in the past to hound good head teachers of community schools out of their jobs in order to facilitate the creation of academies. This whole story smells of falsification and corruption. I suspect that the people wishing to take over schools are not Islamic extremists, but Academy Chains with business interests. A shamefully irresponsible and sensationalised inquiry whose adverse impact on community relations locally and nationally will sadly be lingering long and far. If British authorities are so concerned about their education institutions being infiltrated by ``extremists'' then I suggest they stop Tony Blair, architect in chief of the illegal and violent 2003 Iraq invasion from speaking at colleges and universities across the UK and the world. His lies and fabrications caused the deaths, directly and indirectly, of thousands of Iraqis, British and Americans. While the survivors of his wars suffer in silence, this former British Prime Minister makes millions through his speaking engagements at educational institutions across the world with little or no sign of remorse for the suffering he caused. Nothing I see in the above articles suggests the British Muslim educators in question did anything illegal, let alone anywhere as remotely destructive as the twice elected British Prime Minister. Britain's interests would be served better if they questioned their own domestic and overseas policies instead of perennially whining on about ``extremist'' from their (mostly) law abiding immigrant communities. There are a total of 21300 Primary and 3900 Secondary schools in the UK. Finding that 6 out of these 25200 had board members who wanted to push their extremist views over the governance of those school is not a Islamic Plot or Trojan Horse to Islamises UK. This is a massive overreaction and the Islamophobia on display in the comments is more terrifying than the actual case itself. Stop the racist witch hunt in Birmingham schools. We Muslims have a right to our religion. I decry everything which denigrates Muslims in this country. The media and governmental attitudes and actions, inflame prejudice and ignorance. We want the best for our children and such baseless witch hunt of school governors does not help the cause of better education. Stop this hate against Muslims. It is not them who are terrorists , but all those who imply they are with the help of media you try bringing others to your side giving false details - twin towers wasn't Muslim either - that was the Americans - you will not win as Islam Will forever grow and prove it is peaceful through the will of God (Allah SWT)... amen. This is undermining confidence in the Muslim community and increasing Islamophobia. This is another example of the media whipping up hysteria against the UK Muslim community.  The way our Govt treating British Muslims is as if all Muslims are terrorists unless they prove otherwise. Govt should focus on its job. Governors of this school worked hard to help a failing school achieve outstanding rating from Ofsted. Please fix Ofsted and stop demonising Muslims. Nick Clegg on LBC radio indicated that the DFE is full of right wing ideologues and extremist loons. Islamic schools protect Muslim children from the onslaught of Euro centrism, homosexuality, racism, and secular traditions. All education systems appear to be indoctrination systems. I went to a good private school. Guess how we were 'encouraged' to think about politics! Having a Muslim name in UK is a crime. All UK job application forms have sections ask your race and religions. Most UK employers simply reject your applications just by looking at this section. Native Brits must learn to respect and tolerate those who are different. The needs and demands of the Muslim community are different from those of natives. Muslims are in Britain not to give up their cultural heritage. They must integrate in their new home country, learn new languages and apply for political representation -- without forgetting their cultural heritage. It is important to learn Standard English, but their  languages should not be neglected. They need Masajid and grave yards. Muslim children not only need halal meat or Eid Holidays but they need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their development period also. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. A Muslim is a citizen of this tiny global village. He/she does not want to become notoriously monolingual Brit. The whole world belongs to Muslims. He/she must learn and be well versed in Standard English to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. At the same time, he/she must learn and be well versed in Arabic, Urdu and other community languages to keep in touch with their cultural heritage and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. For a Muslim English is an economic language and Arabic is a religious while Urdu and other community languages are their social and emotional languages.Muslim children not only need halal meat or Eid Holidays but they need state funded Muslim schools with Muslim teachers as role models during their development period also. There are hundreds of state primary and secondary schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion all such schools may be opted out to become Muslim Academies. This means the Muslim children will get a decent education. Muslim schools turned out balanced citizens, more tolerant of others and less likely to succumb to criminality or extremism. Muslim schools give young people confidence in who they are and an understanding of Islamic teaching of tolerance and respect which prepares them for a positive and fulfilling role in society. Muslim schools are attractive to Muslim parents because they have better discipline and teaching Islamic values. Children like discipline, structure and boundaries. Bilingual Muslim children need Bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods, who understand their needs and demands. There is no place for a non-Muslim child or a teacher in a Muslim school. Legally, the state has an obligation to respect the rights of parents to ensure that 'education and teaching(of their children) is in conformity with their own religious and philosophical convictions.' The schools must satisfy the spiritual, moral, social, and cultural needs of Muslim pupils. State schools with non-Muslim monolingual teachers are not in a position to satisfy their needs. A good school is not just a knowledge factory or a conveyor belt for churning out exam passes - it is a community, a family. A community is held together by common values and principles.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4253d14 Comments ● 4245d

Exam Factories

Almost all children now believe they go to school to pass exams. The idea that they may be there for an education is irrelevant. Leading companies are struggling to recruit teenagers with basic skills because schools have been turned into “exam factories”, business leaders have warned. Many employers had been left “disheartened and downright frustrated” by poor levels of literacy, numeracy, communication and timekeeping among school leavers and graduates. Overemphasis on sitting exams and hitting targets throughout compulsory education had robbed children of the chance to develop the “soft” skills needed in the work place. Business leaders believed the emphasis on passing exams at school meant children failed to develop other skills, including the ability to hold a conversation, display good work ethic, turn upon time and apply basic literacy and numeracy. State, independent and faith schools have become exam factories and are only interested in A to C Grades. They do not educate children. The result is that anti-social behaviour, gun and knife culture, racism, drug addiction. binge drinking, high rate of teenage pregnancies and abortions, high divorce rate are common in society. Exam results do not reflect a candidate’s innate ability. Employers have moaned for years that too many employees cannot read or write properly. According to a survey, school-leavers and even graduates lack basic literacy and numeracy skills. More and more companies are having to provide remedial training to new staff, who can’t write clear instructions, do simple maths, or solve problems. Both graduates and school-leavers were also criticised for their sloppy time-keeping, ignorance of basic customer service and lack of self-discipline. Even Muslim schools have also become Exam Factories, only interested in A to C grades just like state schools. There is a positive co-relation between faith, culture and language. Faith needs culture and languages to flourish. According to a research, children who study the language and culture of their parents may achieve more and become more involved citizens. Migrant Muslims speak variety of languages. State schools as well as Muslim schools give lip service to the community languages but majority of Muslim schools completely ignore or discourage community languages. The ex- chairman of the Association of Muslim Schools Mr.Idrees Mears, a native revert totally rejects the teaching of Urdu and other languages. The same opinion was expressed by the head of state funded Islamia School as well as by the ex- Chairman of the Nida Trust. They are not in a position to understand the needs and demands of the bilingual children because they are themselves monolinguals. It is a well known fact that social and emotional education comes with one’s own language, literature and poetry. Pakistani children suffer more than other children. They speak different languages at home and when they go to the Masajid they are exposed to Urdu and Arabic. At schools they are exposed to English and at the age of 11 are exposed to European languages. Now European languages are introduced at Primary level, but Urdu is totally ignored and discouraged by the state as well as by the Muslim schools. English, Arabic and Urdu must be introduced at nursery level so that the children can grow up with three languages. We have already lost three generation and the fourth one is in the process of losing its linguistic and cultural identity by not learning Urdu. The Muslim community is suffering because of social and cultural problems of high rate of divorce, run away young girls, low academic achievements, drug addiction, drinking, teenage pregnancies, disrespect for their parents and elders, forced marriages and honour killings. It is all because our youth are cut off from their cultural roots and languages. I blame state schools because they have never been serious in the teaching of Urdu, Arabic and other community languages.   An American research reveals in 2005 that bilingual learners with no education in their first language take longer to learn English and a bilingual learner with a good education in their own language do best of all. Muslim schools are committing the same mistake by ignoring community languages. Even OFSTED is not serious about the importance of bilingualism and bilingual education. Their priority is the teaching of English language. Nobody is denying the importance of English as an economic language but equally important is the first languages of the children for social and emotional literacy. The Muslim community has been passing through a phase of fourth Crusades. The battleground is the field of education, where the young generation will be educated properly with the Holly Quran in one hand and Sciences in other hand to serve the British society and the world at large. A true Muslim is a citizen of the world, which has become a small global village. We are going to prepare our youth to achieve that objective in the long run. A true Muslim believes in Prophet Moses and the Prophet Jesus and without them one cannot be a Muslim. My suggestion is that in all state, independent and Christian based school special attention should be given to the teaching of Comparative Religion and Islam should be taught by qualified Muslim Teachers to make the children aware the closeness of Islam to Christianity and Judaism which will help them to think about Islam, as “A Pragmatic and Modern Way of Life,” during their life time. British schooling and the British society is the home of institutional racism. The result is that Muslim children are unable to develop self-confidence and self-esteem, therefore, majority of them leave schools with low grades. Racism is deeply rooted in British society. Every native child is born with a gene or virus of racism, therefore, no law could change the attitudes of racism towards those who are different. It is not only the common man, even member of the royal family is involved in racism. The father of a Pakistani office cadet who was called a "***" by Prince Harry has profoundly condemned his actions. He had felt proud when he met the Queen and the Prince of Wales at his son's passing out parade at Sandhurst in 2006 but now felt upset after learning about the Prince's comments. Queen Victoria invited an Imam from India to teach her Urdu language. He was highly respected by the Queen but other members of the royal family had no respect for him. He was forced to go back to India. His portrait is still in one of the royal places. Children should be taught about the contribution Muslims have made to civilisation in order to combat threats of extremism and discrimination. It will help native children to develop positive attitudes towards Muslims. It will bring divided communities closer together, by teaching children about debt west owe to Muslims - coffee and pinhole camera to the three - course dinner and advancement in maths. The teaching will bring together science, history, RE, citizenship and community cohesion - some of the most pressing problems for the minister responsible for the curriculum. One of the major reasons for the alienation of British Muslims is a lack of clear identity. It is crucial for the British society to understand the hugely positive impact that Islamic inventors have had upon the world, and for Muslims to take pride in it. At present there is a widespread mis-conception among many people worldwide that the state of science and technology during the period known as "The Dark Ages" was that of stagnation and decline. The Muslim civilisation flourished and contributed to thousands of essential inventions that still affect western life style. The open recognition of the contribution of the Muslims should be reflected in the National Curriculum. The mainstream history of scientific ideas has failed to acknowledge numerous Islamic scientists and their great efforts and achievements throughout the centuries. A report by the Institute for Community Cohesion found that native parents were deserting some schools after finding their children outnumbered by pupils from ethnic minorities. Schools in parts of England are becoming increasingly segregated. The study focused on 13 local authorities. Many of the schools and colleges are segregated and this was generally worsening over recent years. This is RACISM because British society is the home of institutional racism. My statement regarding Muslim schools where there is no place for non-Muslim child or a teacher is based on educational process and not on racism. Muslim children need Muslim teachers during their developmental periods. For higher studies and research, Muslim teacher is not a priority. I have been campaigning for Muslim schools since early 70s because there is no place for foreign cultures, languages and faiths in state schools. Muslim children are victim of racial abuse and discrimination. Neither Muslim community nor the DFE paid any attention to my proposal. Muslim community kept on setting up Masajid for worshiping and for the education of their children. Masajid help Muslim children to recite the Holy Quran without understanding and teach them how to perform their prayers. DFE introduced Multicultural education for the integration and assimilation of the Muslims. I regard Muslim schools not just Faith schools but more or less bilingual schools. I set up the first Muslim school in Forest Gate London in 1981. Special attention was given to Standard English, Arabic and Urdu languages along with National Curriculum. But due to its closure, it could not become a model school for others to follow. Islamia School, founded by Yusuf Islam became the model school where there is no place for the teaching of Urdu and other community languages and only Arabic is taught. The sound knowledge of one’s owns language would appear to help – not hinder the acquisition of a second language and bilingual children may even have cognitive advantages and that the ability to speak more than one language is going to be increasingly important for the world of the future. Therefore, Muslim children and young Muslims have potentially a major educational advantage, although sadly this is not being developed well at present. British policy makers now recognise bilingualism as an educational asset rather than a problem. Education plays a central role in the transmission of languages from one generation to the next. The teaching of mother tongues is essential in terms of culture and identity. Arabic is a religious language for the Muslims but for Pakistanis, Urdu is also essential for culture and identity. Blind Muslim children in Bradford are learning to read Arabic and Urdu Braille, by a blind teacher who travelled from Pakistan. Now blind Muslim children are not going to miss out on culture, religion, language and the social aspects and integration into their own community and identity. Majority of Muslim children are from Pakistan, Bangladesh and India They need to learn Arabic and Urdu to keep in touch with their cultural roots and enjoy the beauty of their literature and poetry. Urdu is a lingua frankua of the Muslim communities from the sub-continent. The young generation learn Urdu from Indian/Pakistani films, more than two dozen TV Channels and couple of radio stations broadcasting round the clock in Urdu/Hindi. They can speak and understand but are unable to read and write Urdu literature and poetry. Bilingualism and bilingual education should be part and parcel of each and every Muslim school. The problem is that most of Muslim schools are running by British educated Muslims who are made monolinguals by state schools. They do not feel the charm of bilingualism. They have never been given the chance to learn Arabic and Urdu along with English. An English man is proud of his language, culture and faith or no faith. In the same way a Muslim should be proud of his faith, languages and cultures. In my opinion at least three hours a day must be given for the teaching of English, Arabic, Urdu and other community languages from nursery level. The teaching of Standard English will help them to follow the National Curriculum and go for higher studies and research to serve humanity. According to a recent report, Muslim schools performed best overall, although they constitute only a fraction of the country's 7000 schools. Muslim schools do well because of their Islamic ethos and a focus on traditional discipline and teaching methods. They teach children what is right and what is wrong, because young children need structured guidance. Bilingual Muslims children have a right, as much as any other faith group, to be taught their culture, languages and faith alongside a mainstream curriculum. More faith schools will be opened under sweeping reforms of the education system in England. There is a dire need for the growth of state funded Muslim schools to meet the growing needs and demands of the Muslim parents and children. Now the time has come that parents and community should take over the running of their local schools. Parent-run schools will give the diversity, the choice and the competition that the wealthy have in the private sector. Parents can perform a better job than the Local Authority because parents have a genuine vested interest. The Local Authority simply cannot be trusted. The British Government is planning to make it easier to schools to “opt out” from the Local Authorities. Muslim children in state schools feel isolated and confused about who they are. This can cause dissatisfaction and lead them into criminality, and the lack of a true understanding of Islam can ultimately make them more susceptible to the teachings of fundamentalists like Christians during the middle ages and Jews in recent times in Palestine. Fundamentalism is nothing to do with Islam and Muslim; you are either a Muslim or a non-Muslim. Muslim children suffer from identity crises because their parents teach them Islam and their schools teach them something else. There must be a positive co-relation between school and home, otherwise, children will suffer academically, spiritually , socially and emotionally. They are also unable to develop self-confidence and self-esteem. You better teach your children in your own schools and let migrant communities teach their children according to their needs and demands. British Establishment and society should concentrate on the evils of their own society and stop trying to change the way of life of Muslims. Muslim community does not want to integrate with the British society, indulging in incivility, anti-social behaviour, drug and knife culture, binge drinking, teenage pregnancies and abortion.  Prince Charles, while visiting the first grant maintained Muslim school in north London, said that the pupils would be the future ambassadors of Islam. But what about thousands of others, who attend state schools deemed to be "sink schools"? In education, there should be a choice and at present it is denied to the Muslim community. In the late 80s and early 90s, when I floated the idea of Muslim community schools, I was declared a "school hijacker" by an editorial in the Newham Recorder newspaper in east London. This clearly shows that the British media does not believe in choice and diversity in the field of education and has no respect for those who are different. Muslim schools, in spite of meager resources, have excelled to a further extent this year, with couple of schools achieving 100% A-C grades for five or more GCSEs. They beat well resourced state and independent schools in Birmingham and Hackney.  Muslim schools are doing better because a majority of the teachers are Muslim. The pupils are not exposed to the pressures of racism, multiculturalism and bullying. There are hundreds of state primary and secondary schools where Muslim pupils are in majority. In my opinion all such schools may be opted out to become Muslim Academies. This mean the Muslim children will get a decent education. Muslim schools turned out balanced citizens, more tolerant of others and less likely to succumb to criminality or extremism. Muslim schools give young people confidence in who they are and an understanding of Islam’s teaching of tolerance and respect which prepares them for a positive and fulfilling role in society. Muslim schools are attractive to Muslim parents because they have better discipline and teaching Islamic values. Children like discipline, structure and boundaries. Bilingual Muslim children need Bilingual Muslim teachers as role models during their developmental periods, who understand their needs and demands.IALondon School of Islamics Trust

Iftikhar Ahmad ● 4246d1 Comments ● 4246d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 15

HERE IS A CHANCE FOR EALING’S PEDESTRIANS TO HAVE THEIR SAY ABOUT PAVEMENT CYCLING WHERE IT REALLY MATTERS!The LONDON ASSEMBLY’s Transport Committee has just issued a report entitled “Feet First – Improving pedestrian safety in London” http://www.london.gov.uk/mayor-assembly/london-assembly/publications/feet-first-improving-pedestrian-safety-in-london , together with: a CONSULTANCY DOCUMENT in the shape of draft “Pedestrian Action Safety Plan” https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streets/pedestrian-safety-plan/user_uploads/pedestrian-safety-action-plan.pdfBoth the report and the action plan are aimed at reducing pedestrian deaths/injuries on London’s roads.ONE GLARING OMISSION in both documents is the total absence of any reference to PAVEMENT CYCLING.Of course, IT GOES WITHOUT SAYING that PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL under the Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act subject to financial penalties under the 1999 the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (SI 1999/1851).THE TROUBLE IS that, as demonstrated by many of the 200-plus responses my thirteen "PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS” posts on EalingToday, unless NO PAVEMENT CYCLING is said clearly, signs displayed for all to understand and the law enforced by the Met Police, pavement cycling will continue to be seen by the growing number of cyclists as a ‘safe option’ (for themselves) response to the new cycling wave.I shall be submitting the draft GLA paper I published in earlier posts (reproduced below) in my comments on the TfL SAFETY ACTION PLAN in the hope of having the enforcement of the law against PAVEMENT CYCLING added into the plan.COMMENTS on the “Pedestrian Safety Action Plan” may be submitted on-line before 9th May at:https://consultations.tfl.gov.uk/streets/pedestrian-safety-plan/consultation/intro/view before 9th May.DON’T MISS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO GET THE ERADICATION PAVEMENT CYCLING PUT ON THE AGENDA TOO.                                                ===============================A DRAFT PAPER TO THE LONDON ASSEMBLYPROPOSINGA PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE MET POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT BY THE EXERCISE OF THEIR POWERS UNDER  THE  ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988  GRANTED BY STATUTORY INSTRUMENT (SI 1999/1851) THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable stickers on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right, surrounding a pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign.] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol ].Hopefully with such a measure pavement cycling would in time attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places (Health Act 2006  http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml) and become as self-policing as the anti-smoking laws. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)PUBLIC ENCOURAGEMENT – Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures, to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement”                                         =======================

Tony Purton ● 4321d123 Comments ● 4276d

Angry

Damn I’m so angry.Just had the Northfields Ward ‘Vote Labour’ leaflet through my letterbox.The claims of their ‘successes’ are scandalous!“Labour kept Northfield Library open and provided better facilities”.Only after a concerted campaign by, inter alia, Eric Leach and West Ealing Neighbours who fought this same Labour council’s plans to close it or, at best, man it with ‘volunteers’. This ‘battle’ was won despite the loaded ‘consultation’ exercise from this Labour council.“Labour built the Log Cabin Children’s Centre.”What a dreadful sleight on the tireless work for over 30 years by the dedicated leaders and volunteers along with the countless number who raised, and continue to raise funds to support this vital service. The council provided funds to restore a neglected resources which provides, through a charity, a vital service at far lower cost than the council could.“Labour increased primary school places and plans more at Elthorne Park High School”Is meeting a statutory obligation to provide primary school places an achievement? Any council would have to do the same. This is the same ‘colour’ of council that shamelessly embarked on school rebuilding programmes via PFI which will see us all paying for the new buildings long after they have reached the end of their viable life.Then, to add insult to injury, I notice that one of the  Labour candidates is Cllr. Varma. Is this the same Cllr. Varma who was  deselected by his own ward party? . If so, if he was not good enough for Southall Broadway what Damascene conversion now makes him good enough for Northfields?Anyone who values this borough should cast their vote for any party other than labour.

Nigel Brooks ● 4283d2 Comments ● 4283d

Labour skimps on Central Ealing's roads

In the last two years the Labour council has allocated £6.5 million (in total for the two years together) of capital spending to resurfacing the Borough’s roads and pavements.  This sounds like a lot of money but it is half of what the previous administration spent on the roads.  You might think that on average this money would be fairly evenly spent across the Borough.  It isn’t.  Although the council claims to use objective assessments of roads and pavements the actual spending patterns do make you wonder.  In the one year 2011/12 50% of expenditure went to the 5 wards of Southall (they might expect to get 22% on average). In the one year 2012/13 49% of expenditure went to the 2 wards of Northolt (they might expect to get 9% on average).How much has gone to Central Ealing?  Over two years and six wards the council has spent £549K resurfacing ten roads or pavements in all of Central Ealing:Hollingbourne Gardens (road), ClevelandSutherland Road (right pavement), ClevelandHaven Green (road), Ealing BroadwayRavensbourne Gardens (road), Ealing BroadwayThe Knoll (both pavements), Ealing BroadwayGreystoke Gardens (road), Hanger HillChilton Road (both pavements), NorthfieldsRegina Road (road), WalpoleChapel Road (road), WalpoleClovelly Road (road), WalpoleEaling Common had nothing at all.  This represents 8.4% of the Borough’s total spend.  If the six wards had received an equal share they might have expected to get 26% of the total, some 17.6% or £1.144K more.  You can work out for yourself if you think that Central Ealing is getting a good deal.  More details here:http://philtaylor.org.uk/2012/11/labours-road-spending-games/

Phil Taylor ● 4836d19 Comments ● 4287d

What DO our elected Councillors and Council Officers REALLY DO?

Gerry (Mr Tan)! Based on your recent comments on this Forum about the quality of Bond Street I purposefully went off and looked at Bond Street again. Perhaps I was being too unkind? The build quality of the pavement is really good. The natural stone flags have stood the test of footfall and weather well. However, it is the build quality of the work that was done five years that has allowed the street to remain straight and level. Around this, however, there is an air of creeping neglect that suggests that Ealing Council does not really care what is happening hear, or cannot maintain the road. Whether this is financial, political, or due to the main Contractors (Enterprise!) I do not know, however my investigation is intriguing.Starting at the North-East top corner of Bond Street there is a (once-) white painted grill that opens onto the street:It is ajar and reveals what looks like several years of accrued rubbish.As you go down the street you notice the way in which the local businesses are narrowing the busy pavement with their planters and “window boxes” making it difficult to go along the pavement more than one abreast in certain places.The impressive and robust planters have withstood a few years of hard use, however, are clearly not being looked after. On closer inspection this planter has an extensive collection of cigarette ends, rubbish and weeds inside it.Further down the street the topiarised Buxus hedge balls have been allowed to die completely and not replaced. Some sensible individual thought to put some annual bedding in here as a temporary stop gap, though on closer inspection there is nice selection of rubbish and cigarette ends in there; a length of rusty braided wire rope loops up from the soil (originally used as to anchor the roots of the Buxus to stop it being pulled up by thieves and vandals it remains) to trap the unwary child's fingers...Further down the street there are more dying bushes and a staved-in container (this plant is in need of urgent help), and yet more rubbish.Across the road there is a damaged parking meter with yellow and black tape on it leaning at a strange angle awaiting repair.Overshadowing it all across a quarter of the West side of Bond Street are the closed and boarded front of the old YMCA and the associated charity shops; bought by the Council for use as part of the projected film quarter development. Boarded and empty they represent an important asset that the community could use.Bond Street in Ealing, being at the very centre of wealth and business in Ealing, you think would attract greater scrutiny than it does from the main political parties: situated in a Conservative ward in a Borough run by a Labour Council you would think both Conservatives and Labour would be micro-managing this prime site? However, it seems to be suffering the same level of indifference from both parties except, of course, Southall. You would think that all parties would be jumping up and down on the Council Officers and the contractors to ensure Bond Street was A1plusplus AND CLAIMING THIS FOR THEMSELVES. Especially as there is a local election in May!As a final thought, the quality of the real stone pavement seems to have given it a longer life than a cheaper alternative, however, I think that we must bear in mind that this project was conceived and enacted in wealthier times, i.e. before the “credit crunch” and what was acceptable and indeed lauded is not now. The pavement in front of Ealing Town Hall is over-ostentatious, and the immensely expensive cut granite paving stones being used in Southall have a positively “Marie Antoniette – Let them eat Cake” factor about them in  the light of emerging food banks. Based on a stroll through the quality retail street of Central Ealing, I am lead to wonder yet again what the politicians who say they are represent us are actually do?

Peter Mcleod ● 4315d13 Comments ● 4287d

Why isn't planning an election issue?

I had hoped that the borough's under resourced planning department would become an election issue but it would appear that all parties are studiously avoiding it. Perhaps there's just too much potential for embarrassment where certain local politicians are concerned for it to be a comfortable subject for discussion. Over the last two years I have had more contact with the department than I ever wanted (1. a surprise demolition plus the absurd planning applications that followed it, 2. the outhouse complete with shower and toilet that has been built two metres from our kitchen window, 3. an attempt to discover the planning history relating to the Starlite Ballroom) and I am appalled at its inability to cope with its caseload. I am very concerned about the increase in run off caused by the loss of front (and in some cases back) gardens but no one seems willing to address the issue. Telling homeowners that they shouldn't buy a house with a garden if they don't want one isn't a vote winner but I have wondered how much it is costing everyone to deal with extra surface water, something that could be reduced if the rules were enforced. The green waste charge isn't enough of an excuse. It would be interesting to know how many councillors and prospective councillors have exceeded the permitted five square metres of paving outside their properties. I would welcome some support and advice on the council website about how to reinstate a front garden (we are trying to break up a patch of tarmac by letting things grow through it). A grant or reduced council tax for those who do so is probably too much to ask for.

Albertina McNeill ● 4295d11 Comments ● 4288d

'Heartbleed' Bug: Change ALL Of Your Passwords Warn Security Experts

'Heartbleed bug' exposes encryption keys; How to test your favourite sites for safetyNot much consumers can do to fix the problem.Published 09 April 2014  |  Brownie MarieEmail Print Text Size Larger SmallerMore Sharing Services ShareCodenomiconA flaw in the popular OpenSSL software has left millions of people vulnerable to having their banking information, tax files, emails, and other online data exposed. And there's no way to know if someone has accessed your information.Nicknamed "Heartbleed," the "bug" is actually a weakness in OpenSSL's cryptographic software that makes SSL/TLS encryption backfire on computer users. The "https" protocol that is supposed to identify a secure website is actually a signal to hackers that the site is vulnerable to cyber attack. The hackers can then trick a computer's server into sending data stored in its memory.Google security researcher Neel Mehta was the first to discover Heartbleed, and the weakness was confirmed by internet security firm Codenomicon. Alarmingly, researchers found that the Heartbleed flaw has been in OpenSSL for two years. It is unknown if attacks have been carried out, because exploiting the software loophole leaves no trace.In addition to exposing users' passwords, personal files, and credit card information, hackers can also steal encryption keys-- the code that translates computer-generated nonsense into usable information."It may even be able to use the secret key to impersonate the server, tricking users into divulging their password and other sensitive information," Vox Media wrote.Codenomicon states that because of the wide-spread use of OpenSSL and the untraceability of Heartbleed, consider your accounts compromised."You are likely to be affected either directly or indirectly," their website, Heartbleed.com states. "OpenSSL is the most popular open source cryptographic library and TLS (transport layer security) implementation used to encrypt traffic on the Internet. Your popular social site, your company's site, commercial site, hobby site, sites you install software from or even sites run by your government might be using vulnerable OpenSSL."To end Heartbleed's hold on the server, vendors and service providers must adopt the Fixed OpenSSL, which was released Monday."Operating system vendors and distribution, appliance vendors, independent software vendors have to adopt the fix and notify their users," Codenomicon instructs. "Service providers and users have to install the fix as it becomes available for the operating systems, networked appliances and software they use."Changing your passwords before the server has adopted Fixed OpenSSL is useless. As of today, most of the major websites, including Yahoo, Google, and Facebook, have fixed the problem. To check if a website has installed the updated OpenSSL software, visit http://filippo.io/Heartbleed/....................................................................,,...................................................................................................................................................................................................................Yahoo Among Millions of Websites Vulnerable to 'Heartbleed' OpenSSL Security BugA new security bug has been found in OpenSSL, the cryptographic library that secures most of the internet's websites, and Yahoo is one of the of the most well-known domains known to have been compromised.Security researchers are very concerned as the bug - dubbed Heartbleed - has been around for two years and affects encryption of data sent over the internet, meaning users' passwords and other sensitive data are open to being spied on.Other websites featured on the top 1,000 websites list compiled by Mustafa Al-Bassam (a former member of the LulzSec hacker collective who is now a computer science student) include popular websites like Imgur, Flickr, OKCupid, WeTransfer, Eventbrite, Web.de, Outbrain, Stackexchange and Kickass Torrents.It will be difficult to discover if or when you have been compromised as attackers are able to exploit the flaw without leaving any trace of their presence.    What is OpenSSL?    OpenSSL is the software library used in servers, operating systems, email and instant messaging systems to protect internet traffic as it travels back and forth. More than 53% of the web servers which host more than 500 million websites use the software which relies on OpenSSL    (Source: NetCraft)DiscoveredThe bug was first brought to light by security firm Codenomicon, who attempted to attack their own servers:"We have tested some of our own services from attacker's perspective. We attacked ourselves from outside, without leaving a trace. Without using any privileged information or credentials we were able steal from ourselves the secret keys used for our X.509 certificates, user names and passwords, instant messages, emails and business critical documents and communication," they wrote on an in-depth information page.Codenomicon adds that anyone on the internet exploiting the flaw will be able to read the memory of a machine that's protected by a vulnerable version of the OpenSSL library.Security researcher Filippo Valsorda has developed an online test that allows anyone to find out whether a server is vulnerable to being attacked, simply by entering the server's hostname.Not an TLS/SSL flawA new version of OpenSSL, version 1.0.1g is now available to download to patch the flaw, which was caused by an implementation problem in the OpenSSL cryptography library, not a design flaw in SSL/TLS - the protocols used to provide secure communication online."There is no flaw in the TLS protocol or the way it is designed, it's simply an implementation bug that has a catastrophic failure mode. The error is the code equivalent of a typo. But some typos are worse than others," explains Paco Hope, Principal Consultant, at Cigital, a consulting firm which helps organisations to develop secure software."The vulnerabilities in the software you use matter just as much as vulnerabilities in code you write. Finding and fixing such bugs requires applying security throughout the software lifecycle and on all the relevant code, not exclusively at the end and not just exclusively on code you write. And if you acquire software from third parties, you care about what they integrate into the product as much as what they write for you."Fox IT has published a list of indicators that can help companies to identify if their servers may be vulnerable.According to Fox IT, attackers can retrieve the source code of the website, usernames and passwords, as well as private SSL keys.

Nikki Howard ● 4317d10 Comments ● 4302d

What DO our elected Councillors and Council Officers REALLY DO?

Gerry (Mr Tan)! Based on your recent comments on this Forum about the quality of Bond Street I purposefully went off and looked at Bond Street again. Perhaps I was being too unkind? The build quality of the pavement is really good. The natural stone flags have stood the test of footfall and weather well. However, it is the build quality of the work that was done five years that has allowed the street to remain straight and level. Around this, however, there is an air of creeping neglect that suggests that Ealing Council does not really care what is happening hear, or cannot maintain the road. Whether this is financial, political, or due to the main Contractors (Enterprise!) I do not know, however my investigation is intriguing.Starting at the North-East top corner of Bond Street there is a (once-) white painted grill that opens onto the street:It is ajar and reveals what looks like several years of accrued rubbish.As you go down the street you notice the way in which the local businesses are narrowing the busy pavement with their planters and “window boxes” making it difficult to go along the pavement more than one abreast in certain places.The impressive and robust planters have withstood a few years of hard use, however, are clearly not being looked after. On closer inspection this planter has an extensive collection of cigarette ends, rubbish and weeds inside it.Further down the street the topiarised Buxus hedge balls have been allowed to die completely and not replaced. Some sensible individual thought to put some annual bedding in here as a temporary stop gap, though on closer inspection there is nice selection of rubbish and cigarette ends in there; a length of rusty braided wire rope loops up from the soil (originally used as to anchor the roots of the Buxus to stop it being pulled up by thieves and vandals it remains) to trap the unwary child's fingers...Further down the street there are more dying bushes and a staved-in container (this plant is in need of urgent help), and yet more rubbish.Across the road there is a damaged parking meter with yellow and black tape on it leaning at a strange angle awaiting repair.Overshadowing it all across a quarter of the West side of Bond Street are the closed and boarded front of the old YMCA and the associated charity shops; bought by the Council for use as part of the projected film quarter development. Boarded and empty they represent an important asset that the community could use.Bond Street in Ealing, being at the very centre of wealth and business in Ealing, you think would attract greater scrutiny than it does from the main political parties: situated in a Conservative ward in a Borough run by a Labour Council you would think both Conservatives and Labour would be micro-managing this prime site? However, it seems to be suffering the same level of indifference from both parties except, of course, Southall. You would think that all parties would be jumping up and down on the Council Officers and the contractors to ensure Bond Street was A1plusplus AND CLAIMING THIS FOR THEMSELVES. Especially as there is a local election in May!As a final thought, the quality of the real stone pavement seems to have given it a longer life than a cheaper alternative, however, I think that we must bear in mind that this project was conceived and enacted in wealthier times, i.e. before the “credit crunch” and what was acceptable and indeed lauded is not now. The pavement in front of Ealing Town Hall is over-ostentatious, and the immensely expensive cut granite paving stones being used in Southall have a positively “Marie Antoniette – Let them eat Cake” factor about them in  the light of emerging food banks. Based on a stroll through the quality retail street of Central Ealing, I am lead to wonder yet again what the politicians who say they are represent us are actually do?

Peter Mcleod ● 4315d0 Comments ● 4315d

Guerrilla Gardening - Saturday 1st March

Some of you might know the unloved pathway between the Northfield Avenue allotments and the gardens of Loveday Road. You can see it on the google map here..http://tinyurl.com/od67gqgWe've* recently discovered that the pathway belongs to the allotments, which was a bit of a surpise.  So we have decided to adopt it and try and tidy it up. The short term plan is to clear the mud off the tarmac path, sow wildflowers and build a loggery for the stag beetles (which have been spotted on the allotments). We have made a start and you can see what we've already done here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walk-putting-our-plan-actionThe long term plan for the pathway - which we have named Radbourne Walk - is to manage it as a wildlife corridor. We also want ot make it a pleasant place for people too. So if you use it as a short cut or take the dog for a walk we hope you'll find it a pleasant place to be and actually walk along with a spring in your step as you enjoy the flowers. ;-) You can find out more about what inspired us and what our plans are - here...http://ealingdean.co.uk/radbourne-walkIf you are up for a bit of volunteer gardening - you'd be very welcome - even if you only spare us an hour.The next session in on Saturday 1st  March. Our aim is to clean another section of path, we’ll also sow another wildflower meadow and create the first loggery for the stag beetles.We will be working on the lower section near Occupation Road. If you would like to volunteer bring a garden fork, spade, rake or stiff broom. We'll meet on the footpath at 10am on Saturday 1st March for a quick briefing and then off we go. Do let us know if you are coming  (email  allotmentsw13@gmail.com )  - just so we can bring enough tea bags ;-)Christina FoxChair: Ealing Dean Allotment Society* We are the newly formed Ealing Dean Allotment Society - set up to manage the allotments in Northfields Avenue on behalf on our landlord Pathways. All our members are plot holders at Northfields.The aims of the Society are:2.1           To provide a safe, secure, accessible and well-managed allotment site for the benefit of the Members of the Society (“the Members”)2.2           To improve and enhance the allotments for the greater convenience and enjoyment of the Members2.3           To be a good neighbour to the local community2.4           To conserve the allotment as a green space in a built-up area and secure its long term use as allotment gardens and a haven for wildlife and its conservation2.5           To contribute to healthy living through open-air physical activity and the cultivation of natural food produce, flowers and fruit trees2.6           To foster community fellowship and social relationships between Members, irrespective of age, gender, faith, race, ethnic origin, disability or sexual orientation.2.7           To promote the art, science and practice of horticulture among Members and the wider community of Ealing.

Christina Fox ● 4363d21 Comments ● 4317d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 12

An open letter to Ealing’s Council Leader Councillor Julian Bell published in the Ealing Gazette Friday 21 March 2014GOING DUTCH [is last resort for town - editor]Ealing Council’s plan to create a ‘mini-Holland’ for cyclists in the Borough (Gazette 14 March) may conjure up visions of cyclists freely sharing the pavements with pedestrians.I would like to remind the plan’s author, Councillor Julian Bell, that shared use of footpaths is very much a last resort for town planners according to the Department for Transport guidance “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists”. This document says among other things; “It is important to recognise that pedestrians and cyclists are not homogeneous groups and their needs vary considerably”; “Where the need for cyclists to use existing footways or footpaths has been identified …….. their right to be there must be established by changing the legal status of the footway or footpath to that of a cycle track.”; “Where the facility is an adjacent use one - the remainder is a footway or footpath”; “It is illegal for a cyclist to ride on the pedestrian side, but the cycle track will normally retain a right of way for people on foot.”  “No impression should be given that it is acceptable to cycle on the pedestrian side.” “This may need to be reinforced by local publicity and enforcement action.” Perhaps the first thing Councillor Bell should do is spend a small amount of the considerable funds allocated for improving cycling facilities in the Borough on a poster campaign emphasising the illegality of pavement cycling under Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 and the penalties for doing so under the 1999 amendment to the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 (SI 1999/1851), no mention of which appears in any of the Council’s propaganda or training literature encouraging the greater use of cycles.Tony Purton – by e-mailThe following draft paper to the Greater London Assembly sets out this proposition in the simplest terms. If Ealing Council really wants to ‘lead’ in encouraging more cycling in the Borough it should set an example to other London Boroughs by actively discourage pavement cycling, and act before it is pushed!                          A DRAFT PAPER TO THE GREATER LONDON ASSEMBLY                                                         PROPOSING                   A PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES                                                   ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT AS INTENDED BY THE CREATION OF FIXED PENALTY POWERS UNDER THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988 – SI 1999/1851 THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable self-adhesive labels on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right on a white background, surrounding a black pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol .Such a measure would ensure that no-one could be in any doubt about the law. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI 1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)6.  Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.THE EFFECT - Hopefully the result would be that in time pavement cycling will attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places, a criminal offence under the Health Act 2006,  and become as self-policing as the ‘SmokeFree’ laws; the enforcement of which is the responsibility of managers of ‘smokefree’ premises through compulsory signage and ‘verbal’ warnings to customers under the supervision of local authority enforcement officers, such as environmental health officers, trading standards or local community support officers – if physical violence is threatened by a person smoking, managers should seek assistance from the police. See http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social as well as an illegal activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement” [see PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 6 on Page  6 or 7]=======================OFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/madeLTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists:  http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/LTN%202- 04%20Adjacent%20and%20Shared%20Use%20Facilities%20for%20Pedestrians%20and%20Cyclists.pdf

Tony Purton ● 4336d41 Comments ● 4317d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 14

I have forwarded a compendium of all my EalingToday posts on PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS to Tony Armstrong CEO of LIVING STREETS together with a compendium of all the comments those posts have attracted.Mr Armstrong has assured me that all the points I make are reflected in LIVING STREETS’ policy briefing dated November 2009 which can be accessed on this link.http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/sites/default/files/content/library/Policy_briefings/pb0309pedcycle.pdfThis paper represents a very different view of LIVING STREETS policy towards pavement cycling to the imaginary conversations with Living Streets reported by Ben Owen in his three responses to PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 10 [on 11/02/14 and 14/02/14] as the following extracts demonstrate:“The main points of this paper can be summarised as follows: • Pedestrians and cyclists share many common objectives when it comes to urban planning – both  forms of transport have been marginalised at the expense of motor vehicles; •  Pavement cycling is illegal and the law must be better enforced; • Off-carriageway provision for cyclists must never come at the expense of pedestrian space, safety, or amenity. Local action •  Greater enforcement by local police forces of cycling offences, particularly pavement cycling, including targeted crackdowns where appropriate; •  When designing off-road routes for cyclists, segregated, as long as sufficient width is available, is generally preferable to shared use; “Living Streets believes that promoting modal shift to cycling through urban design should not be achieved at the expense of pedestrian space and amenity – but rather through the reallocation of space away from motorised traffic.” “We think that the Home Office guidance above is not strong enough. A pavement cyclist, by definition, is not showing “consideration to other road users” through the very fact that they are invading the space of the most vulnerable.”LET PEDESTRIANS TAKE NOTE AND ACT TO PROTECT THEIR PRECIOUS 'SAFE HAVEN' ENVIRONMENT - THE PUBLIC FOOTPATHS!

Tony Purton ● 4330d4 Comments ● 4329d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 11

“I can see Pavements are for pedestrians - Part 11 coming shortly”; Nigel Brooks post 14/02/14 18:18:00WARNING – SOME OF THE INFORMATION BELOW COULD CAUSE DISTRESS TO OVER-SENSITIVE READERS!“YOU ARE FREE NOT TO READ THE THREAD AND NOT TO COMMENT”; Phillipa Bond post 07/03/14 08:51:00    STALEMATE? The lively discussion on this topic which has been raging for the last two months seems to have dried up. Is it due to Lenten observance, or have the ‘opinion formers’ who seem to dominate the pages of the ‘ealingtoday’ Forum finally run out of RED HERRING arguments to offer? Too much ‘free speech’ can, it seems, lead to verbal indigestion!Prompted by the 170-odd collective ‘musings’ on this topic I refer readers to the DfT’s guidance for Town Planners “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists” which provides authoritative answers to some of the rare ‘on topic’ points made ‘in debate’. See http://www.ukroads.org/webfiles/LTN%202-04%20Adjacent%20and%20Shared%20Use%20Facilities%20for%20Pedestrians%20and%20Cyclists.pdfIT OFFERS THE FOLLOWING GEMS:STATEMENTS OF THE OBVIOUS: 3.1.1.Schemes that involve adjacent or shared use of space between pedestrians and cyclists may be contentious, particularly when the scheme introduces cyclists into areas previously reserved solely for pedestrians. 3.2.3 IT IS IMPORTANT TO RECOGNISE THAT PEDESTRIANS AND CYCLISTS ARE NOT HOMOGENEOUS GROUPS AND THEIR NEEDS VARY CONSIDERABLY. SHARED USE FOOTPATHS ARE A MEASURE OF LAST RESORT: 3.1.2.The process can be summarised thus: identify the need for a cycle route within a particular corridor; check for possible on-carriageway solutions; IF AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTION CANNOT BE ACHIEVED conduct a site assessment to determine whether adjacent or shared use is feasible; and if it is feasible, determine what form the facility should take. If not, CHECK AGAIN FOR ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTIONS or alternative alignments. Ultimately, RETAINING THE CURRENT ARRANGEMENT MAY BE THE PREFERRED COURSE OF ACTION. 3.4.1 It should not automatically be assumed that cyclists can be better served off the carriageway because an improved on-carriageway solution is not available. 5.2.5.If it is decided to abandon the proposal, THE SEARCH FOR AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY SOLUTION MAY BEGIN AGAIN.ILLEGAL FOOTPATH CYCLING MAY BE AN INDICATION OR THE NEED FOR AN ON-CARRIAGEWAY ROUTE: 4.3.10 Illegal cycling on the footpath or footway is recorded. This can indicate both a problem and a desire line to be addressed. If cyclists take to the footway only occasionally, this may indicate that on-road measures to assist cyclists at those locations are more suitable than an adjacent or shared use route.SAFETY INCLUDES PERCEIVED SAFETY: 4.5.3. Any notable changes to conditions for pedestrians should be noted. In most cases, journey times will be unaffected and in a facility with sufficient width, the safety and comfort will also be unaffected. SAFETY IN THIS CONTEXT SHOULD INCLUDE CHANGES TO PERCEIVED SAFETY. CONSULTATION IS A MUST: 5.1.1. A thorough consultation process should be applied no matter what legal process is being used to create the cycle track. Before recommending the detailed design of an adjacent or shared facility, it is essential to seek the views of user groups and others likely to have an interest. LEGAL: 10.1.1. Where the need for cyclists to use existing footways or footpaths has been identified at a specification, their right to be there must be established by changing the legal status of the footway or footpath to that of a cycle track. A SHARED FOOTPATH REMAINS A FOOTPATH IN LAW: 10.1.2. ……… Where the facility is an adjacent use one - the remainder is a footway or footpath. IT IS ILLEGAL FOR A CYCLIST TO RIDE ON THE PEDESTRIAN SIDE. [See also Highway Code rule 62 ] 6.1.5 …….. PEDESTRIANS CAN LEGALLY USE A CYCLE TRACK BUT CYCLISTS ARE NOT ALLOWED TO RIDE ON THE PEDESTRIAN SIDE. POLICE TO ENFORCE: 10.2.1  A considerable amount of public concern is generated by cyclists misusing footways and footpaths, particularly where badly planned or designed facilities encourage such behaviour. 10.2.2 Cycling on the footway in England and Wales is an offence under Section 72 of the Highways Act1835 as amended by Section 85Å1Ç of the Local Government Act 1888. 10.2.3.Enforcement is a matter for the Police. INVALID CARRIAGES CAN USE THE PAVEMENTS: 10.3.3. An invalid carriage can be used on footways, footpaths, bridleways or pedestrianised areas providing that it is used in accordance with the prescribed requirements. Invalid carriages have no specific right to use a cycle track but users commit no offence in doing so, unless an order or local bye-law exists creating one.ALSO:EALING’S BY-LAWS GOVERNING CYCLING IN THE BOROUGH’S PARKS can be found at: http://www.ealing.gov.uk/downloads/download/713/parks_and_open_spaces_by-laws Para (1)(11) says: “No person shall, without reasonable excuse, ride a cycle, except in any part of the ground where there is a right of way for cycles, or along such routes as may be fixed by the Council and indicated by signs placed in conspicuous positions in the ground.”AND:EALING’S ‘MINI HOLLAND’ PROGRAMME:  Ealing Council is bidding to create a MINI HOLLAND for cyclists within the borough – see  http://www.ealing.gov.uk/downloads/download/2548/mini_holland_cycle_bidFINALLY:Last Monday BBC2’s ‘Top Gear’ team presented their own ideas on improving road cycling safety to Westminster Council – available on i-Player.KEEP DEATH OFF THE ROADS BY ALL MEANS, BUT DON’T BRING IT ONTO THE PAVEMENTS. CHECKMATE!COMPLAINTS about the content of the above documents should be addressed to:DfT minister Robert Goodwill – re “LTN 2/04 - Adjacent and Shared Use Facilities for Pedestrians and Cyclists”Councillor Bassam Mahfouz (bassam.mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk) , Ealing Council Cabinet Member for Transport and the Environment: re EALING’S BY-LAWS GOVERNING CYCLING IN THE BOROUGH’S PARKSJulian Bell (julian.bell@ealing.gov.uk) Leader Ealing Council: re EALING’S ‘MINI HOLLAND’ PROGRAMMEhttp://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/: re Top Gear’s programme Monday 24 February

Tony Purton ● 4349d18 Comments ● 4337d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 10

TO THE PEDESTRIAN ‘SILENT MAJORITY’IF YOU WANT TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE - HAVE YOUR SAY  CONTACT LIVING STREETS info@livingstreets.org.uk see: http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streets (T)WITTERING ON THIS WEBSITE IS A WASTE OF TIME AND ENERGY AND WILL CHANGE NOTHING. COMMENTS SO FAR: Living Streets have been provided with a compendium of the 134 comments on this topic posted on this Forum by just 25 people demonstrating all the usual prejudices against the enforcement of the law against pavement cycling for which the police were granted fixed penalty powers 15 years ago under the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851.MOST SENSIBLE CONTRIBUTION yet by Phillipa Bond: “NOT everybody does know that it is illegal to cycle on the pavement  - It would be good if everybody DID know that cycling is illegal on the pavement and DID appreciate that the pavement is used by many elderly people who can/do no longer drive/cycle and for whom a fall could be devastating. Unfortunately they don't and because people are more self-centred nowadays they often just don't want to know when told and are dismissive of anything that doesn't suit them.” [see ‘Dear Tony Purton’ comment 29/01/14 12:03:00] =================================A DRAFT PAPER TO THE GREATER LONDON ASSEMBLYPROPOSINGA PUBLIC AWARENESS POSTER CAMPAIGN BY LONDON’S LOCAL AUTHORITIES ‘PAVEMENT CYCLING IS ILLEGAL’TO HELP THE POLICE ENFORCE SECTION 72 OF THE 1835 HIGHWAYS ACT AS INTENDED BY THE CREATION OF FIXED PENALTY POWERS UNDER THE ROAD TRAFFIC OFFENDERS ACT 1988 – SI 1999/1851 THE PROPOSALTo increase public awareness of the illegal (criminal) nature of pavement cycling by widely displaying small (75MM/3INCH) universally understandable self-adhesive labels on street lamp posts based on the ISO 3864-1 prohibition sign [a red circle with a red diagonal line through it running from top left to bottom right on a white background, surrounding a black pictogram of a cycle; similar to the common NO SMOKING sign] see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_symbol .Such a measure would ensure that no-one could be in any doubt about the law. POSSIBLE INFORMATIVE SIGN WORDINGRiding on the footpath is illegalSection 72 Highways Act 1835 – Highway Code Rule 64 Riding on the footpath is illegalFixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Fixed penalty £50 – Fine £500Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 – SI 1999/1851You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementHighway Code Rule 64POLICE FOLLOW-UPOnce the police are able to take for granted that anyone cycling on the pavement is doing so deliberately (willingly) in defiance of the law, they can deploy the full range of sanctions at their disposal to deal with serial offenders:1. A ‘verbal’ warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course2. A ‘formal’ (written/recorded?) warning with advice that the offender should take a ‘Bikeability’ course 3. A £50 fixed penalty notice, waived if the offender presents proof of having taken a ‘Bikeability’ course within the 28 day appeal period4. Prosecution and £500 fine with a court order that the offender MUST take a ‘Bikeability’ course before cycling on the road again5. Apply the Fixed Penalty system to children below the age of 16 but above the age of criminal responsibility (10 years of age at present)6.  Pedestrians should be encouraged to remonstrate with pavement cyclists and report incidents of pavement cycling to their local community police team – with photographic evidence if possible.THE EFFECT - Hopefully the result would be that in time pavement cycling will attract the same social stigma as smoking in public places, a criminal offence under the Health Act 2006,  and become as self-policing as the ‘SmokeFree’ laws; the enforcement of which is the responsibility of managers of ‘smokefree’ premises through compulsory signage and ‘verbal’ warnings to customers under the supervision of local authority enforcement officers, such as environmental health officers, trading standards or local community support officers – if physical violence is threatened by a person smoking, managers should seek assistance from the police. See http://www.health-safety-signs.uk.com/smoking-legislation-help.shtml FUNDING – In London, the Mayor’s Policing and Crime Office could allocate just 1% of the promised £100M funding to local authorities for road cycling safety measures to be devoted to such a publicity campaign. Further funds could be made available from the surplus income on the ‘Parking Fund’ of many London boroughs which is ring-fenced to be spent only on transport-related projects including funding London’s ‘Freedom Passes’.VALUE FOR MONEY – If pavement cycling is popularly discouraged as an anti-social as well as an illegal activity and becomes self-policing, the cost and effort of policing the offence would be greatly reduced.PAVEMENT CYCLING IS A SEPARATE ISSUE FROM ROAD CYCLING SAFETY – Pavement cycling is illegal and should not be allowed under any circumstances. Safety for cyclists on the roads is a separate objective in its own right. As Home Office minister Paul Boateng said in the last paragraph of his guidelines letter of 9 July 1999 “I note your particular concerns about other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement” [see PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 6 on Page 4]=======================OFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/made

Tony Purton ● 4378d61 Comments ● 4346d

EALING HOSPITAL A&E DEPARTMENT

My visit to Ealing Hospital Urgent Care Unit was a pleasant experience considering I ended up waiting for 3 hours to be seen and left with a leg in plaster. While speaking to the nurse initially I asked what the latest news was on Ealing’s A&E department closing. She said she wasn’t confident it would stay open, but very concerned as to where A&E patients would go as those hospitals such as Northwick Park are under so much strain as they currently stand, I can only imagine! Following my x-ray I had my consultation with a Doctor who I asked again about the A&E department closing, his response was “of course it is going to close!”I was taken back and had to ask why he was so confident in his response, he replied “If there were more white people in the area no one would think about closing the Ealing A&E but it’s not, if this was Kensington & Chelsea do you think they would even think about it?”I had to agree with what he said but I did add that the community of the Ealing borough was very strong and hopefully their support and petitions would prevail. The Doctor made a very good point I wanted to share - Unfortunately we live in a Western society where the Media and Celebrity statuses have a huge impact on impressions made, political decisions made in our big bad society. How can “we” as the Ealing community keep Ealing Hospital A&E OPEN?How can “we” the Ealing Community get a “celebrity” however shallow the idea is “we” the community need the Ealing Hospital A&E department to stay for our Children, our Neighbours, our Friends and Families a Celebrity might just help with “our fight?”

Sasha Brown ● 4360d7 Comments ● 4357d

Closure of Maternity Unit at Ealing Hospital

No More Babies Born In EalingMeeting to launch a Campaign to Save the Maternity Unit at Ealing HospitalTuesday  4th March7.00pmNorthfield Community Centre 71A Northcroft Rd : West Ealing: W13 9SS Underground - Northfield (Piccadilly Line): Bus - E3 • The Maternity Unit at Ealing Hospital is to close.• Children’s services (paediatrics) are to close.• A&E is to be down graded to an urgent care centre.2015 is targeted for the closure of the maternity unit IF capacity can be found at Northwick Park; West Middlesex or Hillingdon Hospital. Theoretically expectant mothers have a choice of any hospital that provides maternity services but in practice not all have availability at the time needed.The maternity department at Ealing was purpose built. It recently upgraded its facilities and now has a total of 11 birthing rooms; three are home-from-home labour suites with one of the three having a pool for water births.  The labour ward has a dedicated operating theatre and recovery room with ease of access to a 15-cot special care baby unit. All this is to go.These closures will mean long journeys to hospitals outside the borough of Ealing. We would welcome to this meeting anyone interested in joining, and helping to plan, a campaign to save the maternity and paediatric department at Ealing Hospital.IF you are unable to attend the meeting but would like us to keep you informed about the campaign please let us know. Thelma Leach (not Eric!)

Eric Alan Leach ● 4368d9 Comments ● 4358d

Why have crossings at Greenford Flyover?

Greenford Green Labour has raised safety at Greenford Flyover as a local priority. It says that they will work with TfL to introduce surface level crossings. Not a new idea, a local Conservative councillor has been promoting this for some time. Why indulge those who are too lazy to use the subways? Their excuse for crossing the slip roads is that they fear being mugged or even murdered in the space under the Flyover but that could happen to them anywhere. On schooldays you will see more than one parent dodging traffic with their children, often with a phone clamped to one ear, because they are late. Apart from being a real menace to responsible drivers this provides a very poor example to the next generation of pedestrians. Other parents make the effort to turn up on time and at certain times of day there are quite a few people with pushchairs using the subways. They aren't perfect, they are quite steep and the dogleg layout makes CCTV coverage awkward, but I still see them being used by people on mobility scooters and cyclists. The opening of William Perkin High School near these subways was a major concern for me and I commented on it during the planning application stage. Whoever is responsible for the area under the flyover has cut back the bushes and undergrowth since the school was launched, and the steps have been improved.A more intelligent option would be to make it much harder to cross the slip roads (higher, more substantial barriers) while using that space for an air-conditioned community building in use 24 hours a day. A walk-in medical centre, a police station, a cybercafe and even a local radio station could make that space useful. It is not suitable for a skate park - it is below street level, out of sight of the road, and and I could feel the effects of the noise and emissions when I was down there for two hours with Henry Shaftoe, a lecturer in Planning and Architecture along with Chris Vallance of BBC Radio 4 on a hot day. Henry Shaftoe has been active in improving a similar space in Bristol (read about it here:  https://info.uwe.ac.uk/news/uwenews/news.aspx?id=1895).One of my neighbours, who admits he has never used the subways since it was built in 1979, wants the space filled with concrete, which shows a profound lack of understanding as to how such structures work. If the crossings are put in place the area under the flyover could be used as a nature reserve, with access limited in the same way that it is at Perivale Wood. It could soak up all the run off caused by the loss of front gardens. It would be interesting to see what local members of the Selborne Society and Friends of the Earth think of this idea. Here is a short video for all those who, like my neighbour, have never been under Greenford Flyover, recorded before the growth was cut back: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-BPcfRRaKbs&feature=youtu.be

Albertina McNeill ● 4359d6 Comments ● 4358d

Over the hill so we don't deserve a pill???

How wonderful - how caring....now the Department for Health proposals would mean that elderly patients would be denied life saving drugs just because they have reached a certain age?Previously we had to contend with a 'postcode lottery' which meant that treatment would be given (or not) depending on where one lived.Now we have the powers that be thinking of a new way to save money - let the elderly go to hell, let's concentrate on those who would benefit society! What do they want to do - do mercy killings? Are the elderly such a burden on society no use to anyone?How do they know if the younger person is actually doing anything to benefit society? Will they check that they are acctually working before givinng treatment on the NHS?What about the elderly who volunteer to help others? What about the role of grandparents? Pensioners worked and contributed to this very society and are rewarded with one of the lowest pensions in Europe.So let me get this straight, first they want to take away our Freedom Passes, the Winter Fuel Allowance, Free TV Licence for the over 75's. Transport by taxi cars for the disabled is also under consideration and this service may be scrapped in April next year.  Then of course those pensioners who do have savings, well they have lost out on miserable interest rates and have done so for years.Pensioners who fall ill and need long term care in a Nursing Home would have to sell their property to pay for it, but the reckless and the feckless would get all this care for FREE. And they say that pensioners are getting away lightly whilst everyone else is having to tighten their belts? Now there is evidence that closing the A&E wards means taking risks with patient's lives because they have to travel further to get treatment - what on earth is happeninng to our NHS which was something the nation could be proud of.The NHS has wasted money for YEARS, so before they go down the proposed route of denying treatment to the elderly perhaps they should first consider the following:Stop surgery which is simply for cosmetic reasons - boob jobs and the like. If the patient wants this then ask them to pay towards it.Let the drunks pay something towards their treatment, same goes for the drug addicts - anything that is self inflicted, unless they are willing to help themselves.Health tourists - they should pay for treatment - it's not the International Health Service!Cut back on Hospital Managers and consider bringing back Matron.Let those who are not entitled to free treatment pay for it!Charge a small fee for missed appointments, if it the patient at fault.And do the unthinkable - check how much is being misappropriated from the hospital!Think of the many ways savings could be made but STOP PICKING ON PENSIONERS!!!

Jean F Fernandez ● 4367d20 Comments ● 4359d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 9

Topic: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 9 Posted by: Tony Purton Date/Time: 29/01/14 17:26:00 FOR THE ‘SILENT MAJORITY’ – THE PEDESTRIANSPAVEMENT CYCLING IS A NATIONAL PROBLEMHAVE YOUR SAY – CONTACT LIVING STREETS info@livingstreets.org.uk http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streets AND THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES LISTED BELOWOFFICIAL REFERENCESHighway Code Rule 64 – You MUST NOT cycle on the pavementSection 72 Highways Act 1835 - Offence Wording: “On (date) at (town) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely (location), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers”Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 - Statutory Instruments 1999 No. 1851: The Fixed Penalty Offences Order 1999  - Section 3 2(b) ‘cycling on the footway contrary to section 72 of the Highways Act 1835’  http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1999/1851/madeFixed Penalty £50   Fine: £500FOLLOW THE NATIONAL DEBATE ON BBC RADIO 4PM’s 17 JANUARY 2014 between Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) Presenter: Eddie MairEDDIE MAIR:  The UK’s Minister for Cycling wants cyclists to use the pavements. Well, to be precise, Robert Goodwill says cyclists should not be fined for mounting the pavement if they are escaping a dangerous section of road. In an e-mail to a cycling campaigner the minister said that discretion should be exercised; QUOTE “When a cyclist is using the pavement alongside a dangerous section of road by the speed of the traffic.” He said enforcement was up to the police but he reiterated guidance from 1999 when fixed penalties for cycling on pavements were introduced. It states that the goal was not to penalise responsible cyclists. Robert Goodwill said “Cyclists must be mindful not to put pedestrians at risk.”Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of the Living Streets a charity that represents pedestrians. Roger Geffen Policy Director of the cycling charity CTCEDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong, what do you think of what the cycling minister has said?TONY ARMSTRONG: Well we’re disappointed in this. We were opposed to the original guidance when it came out because we don’t believe there is a happy compromise were a cyclist can responsibly cycle on the pavement. Many pedestrians value that safe haven status the pavements give them, particularly older people and people with disabilities. So saying that because we have failed to make the roads safe for cyclists we should create another problem by creating intimidation for pedestrians, we think that is not the right solution.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever cycled?TONY ARMSTRONG: I cycle every day. I cycle in London every day and I know exactly how unsafe and fearful it can be.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever felt on a stretch of road where you feel in danger that if you could just get on the pavement for a moment that would be a good thing?TONY ARMSTRONG: Yeah absolutely. And what we’re saying is that if someone is in immediate danger of being in a collision or in immediate threat then get on the pavement. All the pedestrians that are on that pavement would absolutely be fine with that. We are not talking about where people are in immediate danger. The problem is when lots of people feel nervous, and who’s to define what a dangerous road is, because if you feel nervous and if you feel fearful about cycling then you just think ‘Oh, the minister has put this guidance out – I’ll just cycle on the pavements’; and many people are already using the pavements because they don’t feel particularly safe on our streets. Cycling has increased hugely since the original guidance came out and it‘s not an adequate solution if you want to make our streets more sustainable and safer for those more vulnerable people, both pedestrians and cyclists.EDDIE MAIR: Roger Geffen what do you think of what the minister said?ROGER GEFFEN: Firstly let me agree with one point Tony just made which is that the main solution should be to create safe conditions for people of all ages and backgrounds to be able to cycle safely and law abidingly on the roads. People should not feel they have to make the choice between what is safe and what is legal. On the other hand I do think that the guidance does make sense. I think anyone would accept that there is a distinction to be made between cycling in a way that endangers or intimidates pedestrians, in which case they should feel the full force of the law, and where people are actually cycling on the pavement to avoid danger and are not causing it. At that point I think one would accept that it is not police priority to be enforcing the law. What we do believe though is in that situation one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course. We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but fixes it too, by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.EDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong?TONY ARMSTRONG: There are sanctions that are reasonable as Roger said, but it doesn’t solve the central point. We are saying there is no reasonable behaviour that doesn’t intimidate pedestrians. You can’t behave in a way that respects pedestrians even if you are feeling respectful and try to do your best to avoid cycling on the pavement.EDDIE MAIR: I’m looking at a tweet from Paul ……. to this programme ……….. he says that this works fine in Japan where people cycle on the pavement. Is that true?ROGER GEFFEN: That is correct. It is not a solution we would advocate. I do think that Tony has an entirely fair point that cyclists and pedestrians should not be put in conflict because we can’t work out how to create fair conditions whereby people are given their own space on the road. That is the right answer, along with lower speed limits; 20mph should be the norm in urban streets. We should be creating safe conditions so that people are not faced with the choice between what is safe and what is legal. I would agree with Tony on that. I do think though that there are some situations where you have got a busy main road and an empty pavement where if you were to then take enforcement action against that cyclist, particularly if you were talking about a pensioner in the situation, then I do think it would be reasonable for the police to exercise some discretion and I think on that basis we would agree with the minister’s position.EDDIE MAIR: Thank you both. Tony Armstrong from Living Streets and Roger Geffen from CTC.                                      ==============================================FOOTNOTE: LIVING STREETS is also campaigning for ‘Time to cross’ – seehttp://e-activist.com/ea-action/action?ea.client.id=1719&ea.campaign.id=23733&ea.tracking.id=hphttp://www.livingstreets.org.uk/blog-post-by-cutting-green-man-time-tfl-is-putting-cars-before-people==============================================THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESEaling’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk  Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk  Tel: 020 3054 0293 The Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime (MOPAC) http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/about-mopacThe Deputy Mayor for Policing and Crime is Stephen Greenhalgh. http://www.london.gov.uk/priorities/policing-crime/about-mopac/the-deputy-mayor-for-policing-and-crime enquiries@mopac.london.gov.uk or write to: Mayor’s Office for Policing And Crime 2nd Floor, City Hall The Queen’s Walk More London London SE1 2AA Tel: (020) 7983 6532 London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk  Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk  Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk  Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Council Leader: Julian Bell mailto julian.bell@ealing.gov.uk BIKEABILITY: http://bikeability.dft.gov.uk/ CYCLE TRAINING PROVIDER: Cycle Training UK  http://www.cycletraining.co.uk/index.php?pg=2

Tony Purton ● 4365d0 Comments ● 4365d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 7

Wednesday, January 15, 2014                 http://www.livingstreets.org.uk/pavements-are-for-pedestrians-says-living-streetsLiving Streets’ comment in response to ongoing debate around responsible pavement cycling.Living Streets’ Chief Executive, Tony Armstrong, said: "Pedestrians and cyclists share many concerns on our streets, not least a woeful lack of priority and funding from Government to make cycling and walking much safer. Living Streets campaigns on many issues, such as 20 mph speed limits and improved street design, which would benefit and enhance the safety of both groups of road users. "However, there is no benefit in enhancing the safety of one vulnerable road user to the detriment of another, when what we need is a concerted effort to reduce harm from collisions with motorised traffic."We know from our supporters that many people feel threatened and unsafe by pavement cycling, particularly those who are more vulnerable such as disabled people, and people with sight or hearing impairments. “Pavement cycling is illegal and Living Streets will continue to vigorously campaign to ensure anti-social and illegal behaviour is not tolerated."In 2012, 51% of fatalities on London’s streets were pedestrians and nationally 16 pedestrians are killed or seriously injured every day. They are far and away the most vulnerable road users and Living Streets will continue to campaign for measures to allow us all to walk our streets as safely as possible.”For any media enquiries, please contact the Living Streets press office on 020 7377 4914, or email info@livingstreets.org.uk.For any out of office hours enquiries, please call 07545 209865.LISTEN TO THE BBC's "Radio 4 PM" INTERVIEW with Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen  of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) on 17th January: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 mins – or read the full transcript at PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 8

Tony Purton ● 4395d1 Comments ● 4366d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

LETTER BY PAUL BOATENG HOME OFFICE MINISTER July 1999 RE fixed penalty fines for pavement cycling                                             see copy at: http://www.ctc.org.uk/news/goodwill-reiterates-footway-cycling-guidancePAUL BOATENG MP                                                      HOME OFFICEQUEEN ANNE’S GATELONDON SW1H 9ATTel:0171 273 4597Fax: 0171 273 40909 July 1999Ben Bradshaw MPHouse of CommonsLondonSW1A 0AAYou wrote to me on 27 June about your concerns over the introduction of a fixed penalty for the offence of cycling on the pavement. We met to discuss this issue on 30 June, and I am hoping to be able to attend a meeting of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group on 13 July or soon thereafter, when the issue can be further discussed. In the meantime, I think it would be helpful to set out the precise position on the fixed penalty offence as there has been some mis-reporting of it.The fixed penalty for cycling on the pavement is one of seven offences which are being added to the fixed penalty system. The others concern overtaking on a pedestrian crossing (three offences), failing to fixed (sic) a regulation registration mark (number plate) to a vehicle. Driving on the footway and carrying more than one person on a pedal cycle which was constructed to carry one person. These are all existing offences, and in adding them to the list of fixed penalty offences we are not singling out cycling on the pavement for any unique or special attention. The fixed penalty system already applies to a number of cycling offences such as cycling without lights and contravening a traffic sign. The measure is certainly not anti-cycling. As you will know from your contacts with Ministers at DETR, the Government wishes to promote cycling and those Ministers are also concerned, like us, with irresponsible cycling which cannot be condoned.The proposal for the new fixed penalty offences were originally put to us by the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO and were subject to public consultation in July 1996. Administrative and other difficulties have badly delayed the introduction of the Fixed Penalty Order, but I am not in any doubt on the merits of introducing it in England and Wales. As you will see from the Order, the two cycling offences will not be added to the fixed penalty system in Scotland as a different view has been taken of the problem there. But the public correspondence the Home Office has received over the last year to January 1999 about cycling on the pavement shows that 137 correspondents were in favour of introducing the fixed penalty, whilst 30 were against it.Similarly, of 45 letters received from Members of Parliament, 35 were in favour and 10 against it. The prosecutions for cycling on the pavement in England and Wales have risen from 314 in 1995 to 648 in 1997 – the last year for which we currently have figures. Convictions have risen from 282 to 594 over that same period. I believe there is a genuine concern about inconsiderate cycling on the pavement in England and Wales and this particularly affects the elderly and disabled.I know that Alun Michael discussed this informally with some members of the All Party Parliamentary Cycling Group on 19 March last year. I am sure he gave careful considerationto the Group’s concerns, but I know that he wrote to you subsequently on 31 March last year maintaining his view that the fixed penalty for the offence should be introduced. I hope to be able to discuss the issue with the Group myself on 13 July or soon thereafter.I have stressed that this issue is about inconsiderate cycling. The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of the traffic, and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. This is not a clamp down on responsible cycling, and I know the police service too do not see it in that way. It has also b een suggested that young children will be affected. That is not so as the fixed penalty system can only be used for those aged 16 and over. A further misconception has been the idea that the police will b e able to impose an “on the spot” fine. Fixed penalties are nor “on the spot” fines. The recipient of a fixed penalty notice has 28 days in which either to pay the penalty and thereby discharge his or her liability to conviction or to request a court hearing if they wish to dispute the matter. I should also add that the use of the fixed penalty system for this type of offence is not new. A fixed penalty for cycling in prohibited areas can already be issued in some force areas where the local authority has introduced bylaws, for example in pedestrian precincts.Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle in the rfoad. This is one reason why the offence is most commonly enforced by verbal warnings rather than by prosecution. Sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required. The aim of providing the option to issue a fixed penalty notice (currently £20) is so that the police, in appropriate circumstances, may take simple and effective visible action which is stronger than a verbal warning but fall short of prosecution. The police service has many competing priorities to meet and I have absolutely no reason to believe that the introduction of a fixed penalty for cycling on the pavement will lead to a widespread shift of priorities into enforcing the offence. As I have already indicated, the service does not see the issue in that way but the fixed penalty will allow them to deal more simply and directly with particular local problems as and when they arise.I recognise that there are still concerns about how the fixed penalty will be used, and I know that ACPO are keen to dispel any concern that the police will use this power indiscriminately and without due regard to the circumstances, Before the offence is introduced we and ACPO intend to offer reassurance on this point by issuing a public statement on it.I note your particular concerns ab out other offences which pose a threat to cyclists and I am very willing to discuss and consider those problems with you. But I do not see that the issue as affecting the case for having a fixed penalty offence for cycling on the pavement. Nevertheless I hope this letter is helpful in clarifying the details of what is proposed. I hope it will be possible to meet you and colleagues on 13 July or soon thereafter when I hope I shall be able to reassure you further on the issues.I am copying this letter to Glenda Jackson at DETR.PAUL BOATENG

Tony Purton ● 4396d2 Comments ● 4366d

Any animal lovers who can help?

Three weeks on Saturday (on 8 March) there will be demonstrations across the EU against the treatment of dogs in Romania. The aim is to force our governments to put pressure on Romania to stop the cruelty and torture. I am organising the London protest with a friend.In case you don't know, a law was recently passed in Romania allowing for the 'eradication' of all stray dogs, of which there are hundreds of thousands. Dogs - well, dead dogs - are worth a lot of money in a system that is corrupt from the top down, and it's our (EU) money that is being used to line pockets and buy new 4x4s. Many of the general public in Romania have enthusiastically joined in with the 'eradication', and dogs are having their heads smashed in, their legs cut off, being deliberately run over and left to die in agony, being put in crates with a dozen others and dumped on a rubbish tip to starve to death ...The law allows for public shelters to keep the dogs for 14 days in case they are claimed - but because most of them will be killed on day 14 officials consider it a waste of money to give the dogs food or even water. After the 14 days, the dogs are not put down humanely - the money received to buy anaesthesia can be pocketed and the dogs have their heads kicked in, or smashed with a shovel, or they are injected with antifreeze or bleach. An agonizing death, but so much cheaper! Cheaper still, many of them are trapped by snowfall in the makeshift shelters - they freeze or suffocate.This is not an anti-Romanian rant. Because of the crisis I have met many wonderful Romanians who are appalled by what is being carried on in their name. But they need help. Can you help us raise funds to get the dogs out of the public shelters, come on our demonstrations, send blankets or maybe even foster or adopt a dog from Romania? I've met many 'Rommie rescues' and they are just lovely, normal dogs.If you want to find out more, try an internet search - but, beware, the photos are graphic and they will shock and haunt you. Or you can pm me, and I can tell you more and how you can help.Thank you for reading.

Lynn Clements ● 4373d1 Comments ● 4373d

TFL oppose extending bus routes when Ealing Hospital shuts

What additional hospital bus routes do we need (when the Ealing Hospital services are reduced)?There is a TFL appendix which will be discussed at a Town Hall meeting open to the public on  Tuesday 11 February at 6.00 p.m. in the Queens Hall. .Council say This is likely to be a very sensitive and important issue for many residents. Typical of the relevant department, nothing is shown on the front page of the Council website, nor anywhere in the Gazette.TFL sayThe Travel Analysis shows that about an estimated 2,260 would travel from Central Middlesex Hospital and 41,280 would travel from Ealing Hospital to West Middlesex Hospital annually – a total of 43,540 patients per year or about 174 per weekday, which equates to 350 daily trips assuming 2-way journeys.To extend say the E8 or E2 service to West Middlesex Hospital (cost £550-£700K) they sayFor one of these extensions to meet our current threshold for implementation it would require at least 1,250 additional trips per weekday.In other words for the numerically challenged much, much more than 350 trips per day.They conclude Given the current provision of bus services and the predicted number of trips to West Middlesex Hospital, the existing network is adequate to cater for additional demand to the hospital. (W.Mid).Also no other routes will be extended.So the country save billions on hospital reorganisation and TFL gets away scot free on account of their ridiculously high criteria for new bus routes, for which the authorities will make no special exception.TFL must be laughing their socks off as this meeting will be poorly attended due to the projected underground strike which starts this Tuesday at 9.00p.m. Full reference herehttp://ealing.cmis.uk.com/Ealing/Document.ashx?czJKcaeAi5tUFL1DTL2UE4zNRBcoShgo=zPFiS1JI2KpKuSSW7hRrl7vr5g67%2bz8PrjD4kKa08b68mXASJOJ3pw%3d%3d&rUzwRPf%2bZ3zd4E7Ikn8Lyw%3d%3d=pwRE6AGJFLDNlh225F5QMaQWCtPHwdhUfCZ%2fLUQzgA2uL5jNRG4jdQ%3d%3d&mCTIbCubSFfXsDGW9IXnlg%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&kCx1AnS9%2fpWZQ40DXFvdEw%3d%3d=hFflUdN3100%3d&uJovDxwdjMPoYv%2bAJvYtyA%3d%3d=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&FgPlIEJYlotS%2bYGoBi5olA%3d%3d=NHdURQburHA%3d&d9Qjj0ag1Pd993jsyOJqFvmyB7X0CSQK=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNR9xqBux0r1Q8Za60lavYmz=ctNJFf55vVA%3d&WGewmoAfeNQ16B2MHuCpMRKZMwaG1PaO=ctNJFf55vVA%3d

George Knox ● 4376d1 Comments ● 4375d

Puns for Educated Minds

How does Moses make his tea? Hebrews it....Venison for dinner again? Oh deer!A cartoonist was found dead in his home. Details are sketchy.I used to be a banker, but then I lost interest.Haunted French pancakes give me the crepes.England has no kidney bank, but it does have a Liverpool.I tried to catch some fog, but I mist.They told me I had type-A blood, but it was a Type-O.I changed my iPod's name to Titanic. It's syncing now.Jokes about German sausages are the wurst.I know a guy who's addicted to brake fluid, but he says he can stop any time.I stayed up all night to see where the sun went, and then it dawned on me.This girl said she recognized me from the vegetarian club, but I'd never met herbivore.When chemists die, apparently they barium.I'm reading a book about anti-gravity. I just can't put it down.I did a theatrical performance about puns. It was a play on words.I didn't like my beard at first. Then it grew on me.Did you hear about the cross-eyed teacher who lost her job because she couldn't control her pupils?When you get a bladder infection you know urine trouble.Broken pencils are pretty much pointless.What do you call a dinosaur with an extensive vocabulary? A thesaurus.I dropped out of the Communism class because of lousy Marx.All the toilets in New York's police stations have been stolen. As of now, it appears the police have nothing to go on.I got a job at a bakery because I kneaded dough.Velcro - what a rip off!

Graham Weeks ● 4377d4 Comments ● 4377d

My story.. Someone somewhere must remember him or taxi rank or clubs xxxx

Find my dadHere is my story :-(I was born Mandy Ann Millsom 01/04/1969.Birth mothers name Linda olive Millsom 11/11/50She is now known as Linda Maidment and lives in Stevenage xxxxxxxxShe has a total memory block and cannot remember ANYTHING at all so no point contacting her.In 1969 my father, Christopher would have been 23/24yrs old. He was never told Linda was pregnant.In 1969 he worked at the wimpy in ealing as a chef.This went in the Ealing gazette:Do you remember a Christopher or Christos who worked in West Ealing?A mum of four, who was adopted at birth, is desperate to find her real father who worked in Ealing in 1969.Bev Gauntlett, 43, from Surrey,is asking for help from anyone who might have been in West Ealing or Shepherd’s Bush in the 1960’s and knew a Christoper or Christos who worked at the Wimpy close to the Lido junction.She says: ” In my adoption file it describes him as Greek Cypriot, 5″ 6 dark straight hair, dark brown eyes, olive complexion, good looking. His name is Christopher or Christos. In 1969 he was 24yrs old and worked as a chef at the wimpy bar, Ealing ( Lido junction). Apparently he was a very nice man, liked a joke and always smiling. He had an older brother and they both did some casual driving too. Christopher or Christos apparently had a room in the Shepherd’s Bush area. He met my mother and they had a relationship for about 6 months.”Bev says she discovered she had been adopted by accident and her birth mother Linda Olive Millsom had never told her father that she was pregnant.” My dad has 4 beautiful granddaughters that he also doesn’t know about.. It’s so sad. If anyone can remember hanging out in those days or even knew any of his friends or even the first letter of his surname would be fantastic..I so desperately want to find my dad, my father, my roots.”If you think can help please contact Bev via euGreeka or directly by email.Additional info:The owners of the wimpy back in 1969 have a son called "Ali" his number is xxxxxxx and was going to find out who his parents sold the wimpy to next as they may remember him.Another lady contacted me and said " Ok I lost all contact with Chris a couple years ago the only thing I can suggest that you call the salon he used to own, its now called Class".More infoHi In 1969 he was 24yrs old.he had a room in the shepherds bush area.dont know his older brothers name but they both did some casual driving. My father is of Greek orodox. He played card games in a Greek club.his brother was a taxi driver. I think my birth mother stayed at the YMCA for women Another lady told me this:She knows of him from years ago and think he lives and eats in wetstone north london xAnother old Greek man told me that a friend of his used to manage a taxi firm way back then and said that a Greek guy christos drove for them for about a month an that also a lady called Linda used to answer the phones.think he lives and eats in wetstone north london now x

Bev Gauntlett ● 4408d2 Comments ● 4380d

New training thread!! (Pictures)

Gosh, haven't we done well! Pictures galore!!Just remember we didn't have a clue a few months ago?But thanks to our professors..we've made progrerss.Now we've learnt how to post pictures from cyberspace..whether or not we are using IE (Internet Explorer) or some other Browser like MF (Mozilla Firebox) We have learnt how to use the img scr= (plus the two vv thingies)...which is like a carrier for transferring pictures from one place to another.I've described in my amateurish way to some people what BROWSERS are.Imagine you are moving into a new house..I tell them..the kitchen is just a shell..and you need to install a ready-made kit like MFI..or JOHN Lewis, or Smallbone..which will each have different facilities like dual taps, washer/dryer combined, one kit may have a mangle!! and another might have a  spin dryer. In the same way Internet Explorer is a popular USA kit...but an alternative is Mozilla Firebox (born out of Netscape and AOL??). I believe that there is one called Opera too. They all seem to have different features..and interestingly Peter has just had installed MF so it seems..and on another thread he compliments it's (MF's)  speed. There are other goodies too.Perhaps this subject can be discussed on Peter'e new Topic/thread.So..in seaching Cyberspace....we find pictures we like or need...do a right click etc etc and look for the jpg at the end of the picture address(THE URL)...and copy and taste onto the reply screen..and add the img src= etc.The most valuable addition to these feats though..has been the possibility of using one "own" picture..the ones you have perhaps downloaded from your camera onto MY PICTURES..or that you have transferred from cyberspace to your MY PICTURES. Several of us are now using the Internet Hosting facility IMGHOSTINGwhich enables one to "UPLOAD" any picture onto your own PRIVATE GALLERY(album)..before despatching the pictures either to this Forum ..or to e-bay etc etc.  IMGHOSTING is free up to point..after which you pay £7? for 6 months.There are other hosting services too..including fotopic etc.I've found that its necessary to reduce the size of some of the photos in MY PICTURES.  I locate the picture and bring it up on screen..and by right-clicking I find what size it is. Many from my Canon Ixus 500 camera..are shown to be 1800 x900 for example. With the Photo shop I have..I go to VIEW, click RESIZE, and them reduced to size by pressing  on an arrow. When the size reaches say 750 x ?..I save it..and then use it to post to IMG HOSTING..who only accept these modest sizes. But the Waitrose picture came out ok ..didn't it..or was it still too large!Graham wanted help with his APPLE MAC computer  ..so maybe someone can give him advice about what he has to do to post Pictures...and become a PP(Picture Poster)!Anyone else need help with Picture postings..or any questions?

Jim Lawes ● 7494d25 Comments ● 4382d

World Famous Expert on Suburbia Sir Peter Hall to speak on Saturday at Ealing Central Library

Hi there, just wanted to draw your attention to an event this Saturday in Ealing Central Library. Hope this works as a hyperlink:http://bloomsburyhistory.typepad.com/bloomsbury-history/2014/01/local-history-conference-suburbia-in-west-london-ealing-uk.htmlOtherwise click on "events" to the right. More info: A local history conference on the subject of suburbia with particular reference  to west London will take place this Saturday 25th January at Ealing Central Library from 2.30. A series of talks will be delivered by speakers including Ealing borough historian Jonathan Oates, the Sociology Lecturer and former Deputy Mayoress of Ealing Dr Rupa Huq and the eminent academic and previous government advisor on urbanism and planning Sir Professor Peter Hall. Professor Hall, author of some 40 books will be discussing his latest “Good Cities, Better Lives” and Dr Huq will draw on her recent two titles "On the Edge" and "Making Sense of Suburbia Through Popular Culture". Both are Ealing residents. Huq will argue that the true soul of the nation now resides in suburbia and that the tourist attractions of Buckingham Palace, Stratford on Avon and Stonehenge tell us nothing about contemporary British society whereas Ealing is a microcosm of it. Other topics to be probed include the status of Bedford Park, whether the title "Queen of the Suburbs" for Ealing is justified and why riots came to Ealing in 2011. All are welcome.To book call 020 8 825 9278 or 0203 700 1053 or email ealing.reading@carillionservies.co.uk Admission is £4Hope to see you there, do spread the word

Rupa Huq ● 4393d4 Comments ● 4384d

CYCLING TEST A 'SENSIBLE' IDEA

Letters: Ealing Gazette Friday 24 January 2014ROAD TESTS FOR CYCLISTSWhat commentators [Colin Lomas 17 January and others] either forget, or are not aware of, is that cycling on the pavement was made a fixed penalty offence by Home Office Minister of State Paul Boateng in 1999 to help the police enforce Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act. DfT minister Robert Goodwill has just reissued those 1999 guidelines.The issues were discussed on Radio 4’s PM programme last Friday 17 January [http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 mins] between Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC). Roger Geffen speaking for cyclists said “…….. one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course"."We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but but fixes it too by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.”Seen in this light, Jean Orman’s idea [letters 10 January] that cyclists should be required to take a test before they ride on the roads sounds eminently sensible. Because of confusion in the public mind, a police and local authority publicity/poster campaign reminding the population at large that the ‘default’ law is that pavement cycling is illegal, unless signposted otherwise [This] would go a long way to help the police enforce the law against it by making sure that those who do it do so knowingly (or ‘willingly’) as the law says. Tony Purton Ealing                    ==================================NOTE: The full transcript of the BBC Radio 4PM interview referred to above can be read under post PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 8The full text of Home Office Minister's July 1999 'guidance' letter can be read under post PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

Tony Purton ● 4391d17 Comments ● 4388d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 8

The transcript of BBC Radio 4 PM’s interview with Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of Living Streets and Roger Geffen of the National Cyclist Touring Charity (CTC) on 17th January 17.30:http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b03pmkb3  31.56 mins - 37.20 minsPresenter: Eddie MairMAIR:  The UK’s minister for cycling wants cyclists to use the pavements. Well, to be precise, Robert Goodwill says cyclists should not be fined for mounting the pavement if they are escaping a dangerous section of road. In an e-mail to a cycling campaigner the minister said that discretion should be exercised QUOTE “When a cyclist is using the pavement alongside a dangerous section of road by the speed of the traffic.” He said enforcement was up to the police but he reiterated guidance from 1999 when fixed penalties for cycling on pavements were introduced. It states that the goal was not to penalise responsible cyclists. Robert Goodwill said “Cyclists must be mindful not to put pedestrians at risk.”Tony Armstrong Chief Executive of the Living Streets a charity that represents pedestrians. Roger Geffen Policy Director of the cycling charity CTCEDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong, what do you think of what the cycling minister has said?TONY ARMSTRONG: Well we’re disappointed in this. We were opposed to the original guidance when it came out because we don’t believe there is a happy compromise were a cyclist can responsibly cycle on the pavement. Many pedestrians value that safe haven status the pavements give them, particularly older people and people with disabilities. So saying that because we have failed to make the roads safe for cyclists we should create another problem by creating intimidation for pedestrians, we think that is not the right solution.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever cycled?TONY ARMSTRONG: I cycle every day. I cycle in London every day and I know exactly how unsafe and fearful it can be.EDDIE MAIR: Have you ever felt on a stretch of road where you feel in danger that if you could just get on the pavement for a moment that would be a good thing?TONY ARMSTRONG: Yeah absolutely. And what we’re saying is that if someone is in immediate danger of being in a collision or in immediate threat then get on the pavement. All the pedestrians that are on that pavement would absolutely be fine with that. We are not talking about where people are in immediate danger. The problem is when lots of people feel nervous, and who’s to define what a dangerous road is, because if you feel nervous and if you feel fearful about cycling then you just think ‘Oh, the minister has put this guidance out – I’ll just cycle on the pavements’; and many people are already using the pavements because they don’t feel particularly safe on our streets. Cycling has increased hugely since the original guidance came out and it‘s not an adequate solution if you want to make our streets more sustainable and safer for those more vulnerable people, both pedestrians and cyclists.EDDIE MAIR: Roger Geffen what do you think of what the minister said?ROGER GEFFEN: Firstly let me agree with one point Tony just made which is that the main solution should be to create safe conditions for       people of all ages and backgrounds to be able to cycle safely and law abidingly on the roads. People should not feel they have to make the choice between what is safe and what is legal. On the other hand I do think that the guidance does make sense. I think anyone would accept that there is a distinction to be made between cycling in a way that endangers or intimidates pedestrians, in which case they should feel the full force of the law, and where people are actually cycling on the pavement to avoid danger and are not causing it. At that point I think one would accept that it is not police priority to be enforcing the law. What we do believe though is in that situation one of the options available to the police should be to send the cyclist on a cycle training course. We send drivers who’ve offended on driver training and speed awareness courses. Surely it is even more justified to do that for cyclists, given that is effectively a punishment that not only fits the crime but fixes it too, by giving cyclists the confidence and skills to ride safely and correctly and according to the law on the roads.EDDIE MAIR: Tony Armstrong?TONY ARMSTRONG: There are sanctions that are reasonable as Roger said, but it doesn’t solve the central point. We are saying there is no reasonable behaviour that doesn’t intimidate pedestrians. You can’t behave in a way that respects pedestrians even if you are feeling respectful and try to do your best to avoid cycling on the pavement.EDDIE MAIR: I’m looking at a tweet from Paul ……. to this programme ……….. he says that this works fine in Japan where people cycle on the pavement. Is that true?ROGER GEFFEN: That is correct. It is not a solution we would advocate. I do think that Tony has an entirely fair point that cyclists and pedestrians should not be put in conflict because we can’t work out how to create fair conditions whereby people are given their own space on the road. That is the right answer, along with lower speed limits; 20mph should be the norm in urban streets. We should be creating safe conditions so that people are not faced with the choice between what is safe and what is legal. I would agree with Tony on that. I do think though that there are some situations where you have got a busy main road and an empty pavement where if you were to then take enforcement action against that cyclist, particularly if you were talking about a pensioner in the situation, then I do think it would be reasonable for the police to exercise some discretion and I think on that basis we would agree with the minister’s position.EDDIE MAIR: Thank you both.  Tony Armstrong from Living Streets and Roger Geffen from CTC.===================================================================FOOTNOTE: Extracts from Community Forum Code of Conduct“Avoid disruptive activity online, such as persistent off-topic comments and postings or statements that incite others to ……………… participate in illegal activities. “This is not a chat-site.

Tony Purton ● 4395d4 Comments ● 4393d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 5

To many pedestrians last Friday’s newspaper headlines “Minister: Let cyclists ride on pavement” will be seen as a body blow to pedestrian safety. For cycling groups it will undoubtedly be hailed as a ‘freedom charter to ride on the pavements’. There is, however, more to it than that..DfT minister Robert Goodwill was responding to complaints from cycling campaigners that during their recent ‘Operation Safeway’ blitz on road safety in London, the police have been ‘over-zealous’ in issuing fines every time cyclists were spotted riding on the pavement. All Robert Goodwill has done is to reiterate the guidance issued by Labour Home Office minister Paul Boateng in 1999 when pavement cycling was made a fixed penalty offence after concerns were expressed that the police were turning a blind eye to those cycling on the footpath - prosecutions in the ten years 1984 to 1994 had declined significantly. “The introduction of the fixed penalty is not aimed at responsible cyclists who sometimes feel obliged to use the pavement out of fear of traffic and who show consideration to other pavement users when doing so. Chief police officers, who are responsible for enforcement, acknowledge that many cyclists, particularly children and young people, are afraid to cycle on the road, sensitivity and careful use of police discretion is required.” At least Robert Goodwill acknowledges that pavement cycling is illegal. That is a great leap forward from 2009 when the DfT’s top civil servant Robert Devereux told the Parliamentary Public Accounts Committee during a hearing on ‘Improving road safety for pedestrians and cyclists in Great Britain’ that he thought pavement cycling was legal - until he checked with his support staff sitting next to him and had to admit he was wrong! See http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/665/9061004.htm Q42 - Q47 49th Report 2008–09.FOR THE FULL TEXT OF PAUL BOATENG’S 1999 GUIDANCE SEE: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 6

Tony Purton ● 4396d3 Comments ● 4395d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 4

I am grateful to Ben Owen, Al Stuart, Paul James and Nigel Brooks for their continued intemperate comments on my purely factual posts about the illegality of pavement cycling PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 3. Each time they whinge about the unfairness of life as seen from the saddle of a bicycle they bring the topic back up to the top of the list, increasing the readership of my original posts and exposing their own intolerant attitude to us pedestrian PLEBS!.THERE ARE NO LAWS ABOUT PEDESTRIAN BEHAVIOUR because walking is a fundamental means of human movement carried out at unthreatening speeds. It is the speed of mechanically assisted human movement which creates danger, is confined to the roads, and is controlled by the traffic laws. EVEN ‘JAYWALKING’ IS NOT ILLEGAL IN THIS COUNTRY! See these extracts from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jaywalking“The United Kingdom does not formally describe priority regulations for drivers and pedestrians at road junctions or other locations, except with respect to marked Zebra, Pelican, and Puffin crossings, where motorists are required to give way to pedestrians under defined conditions. Elsewhere, the Highway Code relies on the pedestrian making their own judgement on whether it is safe to cross based on the Green Cross Code. If the pedestrian's judgement was correct then no evasive re-action should be required by any drivers, but drivers [including cyclists] are expected to avoid hazards and are examined on their ability to do so during the Hazard Perception Test.” “The term "jaywalking" is rarely used, and there is no law preventing jaywalking as such. In England, Wales and Scotland it is legal to cross all roads except motorways (where pedestrians and slow vehicles are not permitted), and roads with the "No Pedestrians" sign displayed. The Highway Code contains additional rules for crossing a road safely, but these are recommendations and not legally enforceable, although as with other advisory parts of the Highway Code compliance or otherwise can be used to establish liability in civil law proceedings such as insurance claims.” “When crossing a road, pedestrians are advised to wait until it is safe to cross. Vehicles have priority when crossing a road, although, if a pedestrian is crossing the road across a side street where a car is about to turn, vehicles should give way to the pedestrian. This is demonstrated in the Highway Code [Rule 170].] In UK schools children are taught to cross roads safely through the Green Cross Code. British children are taught to "Stop, Look, Listen and Think" before crossing a road, as demonstrated in the Arrive Alive campaign.”“Zebra crossings are points where pedestrians can cross with the right of way. Traffic [including bicycles!] should [MUST Highway Code Rule 195] stop at such points for pedestrians.” AND THIS IS WHAT THE HIGHWAY CODE SAYS TO VEHICLE DRIVERS/RIDERS [INCLUDING CYCLISTS!] about ‘Road users requiring extra care’ 205 There is a risk of pedestrians, especially children, stepping unexpectedly into the road. You should drive with the safety of children in mind at a speed suitable for the conditions.206 Drive carefully and slowly when• in crowded shopping streets, Home Zones and Quiet Lanes (see Rule 218) or residential areas • driving past bus and tram stops; pedestrians may emerge suddenly into the road • passing parked vehicles, especially ice cream vans; children are more interested in ice cream than traffic and may run into the road unexpectedly • needing to cross a pavement or cycle track; for example, to reach or leave a driveway. Give way to pedestrians and cyclists on the pavement • reversing into a side road; look all around the vehicle and give way to any pedestrians who may be crossing the road • turning at road junctions; give way to pedestrians who are already crossing the road into which you are turning • the pavement is closed due to street repairs and pedestrians are directed to use the road • approaching pedestrians on narrow rural roads without a footway or footpath. Always slow down and be prepared to stop if necessary, giving them plenty of room as you drive past. 207 Particularly vulnerable pedestrians. These include:• children and older pedestrians who may not be able to judge your speed and could step into the road in front of you. At 40 mph (64 km/h) your vehicle will probably kill any pedestrians it hits. At 20 mph (32 km/h) there is only a 1 in 20 chance of the pedestrian being killed. So kill your speed • older pedestrians who may need more time to cross the road. Be patient and allow them to cross in their own time. Do not hurry them by revving your engine or edging forward • people with disabilities. People with hearing impairments may not be aware of your vehicle approaching. Those with walking difficulties require more time • blind or partially sighted people, who may be carrying a white cane using a guide dog. They may not be able to see you approaching • deafblind people who may be carrying a white cane with a red band or using a dog with a red and white harness. They may not see or hear instructions or signals.208 Near schools. Drive slowly and be particularly aware of young cyclists and pedestrians. In some places, there may be a flashing amber signal below the ‘School’ warning sign which tells you that there may be children crossing the road ahead. Drive very slowly until you are clear of the area.209 Drive carefully and slowly when passing a stationary bus showing a ‘School Bus’ sign (download ‘Vehicle markings’ (PDF, 537KB)) as children may be getting on or off.210 You MUST stop when a school crossing patrol shows a ‘Stop for children’ sign (download ‘Signals by authorised persons’ (PDF, 123KB) and ‘Traffic signs’ (PDF, 486KB)).Law RTRA sect 28

Tony Purton ● 4401d20 Comments ● 4397d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 3

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 3THE HOME OFFICE ADVICE quoted by Paul James was published by Labour Home Office minister Paul Boateng in 2006 and has been overtaken by events. There has been a dynamic to increase the use of bicycles, boosted by last year’s Olympic Games and heavily promoted by the government as a new ‘green’ idea. IN 2009 THE PUBLIC ACCOUNTS COMMITTEE in its report ‘Improving road safety for pedestrians and cyclists in Great Britain’ said: 4. “Some cyclists are perceived to behave irresponsibly, such as riding on pavements and disregarding red traffic signals, thereby posing a danger to themselves and making other road users including elderly pedestrians feel unsafe”5.  There appears to be a lack of understanding amongst the public and some police about the legal requirements for cyclists, including, for example, whether it is illegal to cycle on a pavement. The Department confirmed that it was illegal and undertook to consult its police liaison officer about how it might draw this to the attention of police forces across the country. Legislation also requires new bicycles to be fitted with bells but it is not illegal, subsequently, to remove them. The Department agreed that it could devise new rules to constrain irresponsible cyclists but said that it would need to be satisfied that the police could enforce them. Enforcing cycling offences was typically not high on the agenda of most police forces due to competing demands on their time.Robert Devereux, Permanent Under-secretary of the DfT, giving evidence to the Committee said he did not think pavement cycling was illegal – but when pressed by Geraldine Smith MP confirmed that it was, which seemed to come as a surprise to him. Read the evidence for yourself http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/665/9061004.htm Q42  Geraldine Smith: Can you tell me, first of all: is it illegal to cycle on pavements?   Mr Devereux: No, I do not think so. I will just check that. I have a feeling that it is a Highway Code recommendation not to do it rather than it being actually against the law. Mr Devereux: Sorry, I have just checked this and it is illegal to be on the pavement. That being the case, there is no reason why a policeman should not—   Q45  Geraldine Smith: It is illegal? Do the Department for Transport make that clear to the police because a police superintendent was at this forum with me and he said that it was legal to cycle on pavements, so, if you are confirming that, I can go back and tell him that it is actually illegal.  Mr Devereux: It is page 22 of the Highway Code in red, which means it is illegal, "You must not cycle on the pavement".  Q46  Geraldine Smith: Excellent! I am very pleased about that. I shall go back and tell him.   Mr Devereux: It is Rule 64. In terms of whether or not people are aware of it, and you have clearly caught me out, I was not expecting quite so many anti-cyclist questions, so forgive me, we have within the Department a police liaison officer and I will go back and make sure that he actually makes that clear to the police  Q47  Geraldine Smith: Yes, if you would, because I was quite surprised at these forums that it came up, not just at one, but at every one of them, as an area which people were really concerned about, and I did expect it a bit, but I think there is a feeling that people in authority do not take it seriously enough. As I say, the superintendent that I was with said, "No, it is legal to cycle on the pavement, it is just illegal if it is irresponsible cycling", and that is quite different from what you have said, so maybe there should be an instruction going out to every police force in the country making the position clear to people.   Mr Devereux: I will ask the liaison officer to do something appropriate to make sure it is clear. CURRENT DfT AND HOME OFFICE MINISTERS AND THE POLICE are in no doubt that pavement cycling is illegal as they have confirmed to me personally and whose words I have published.  IN HIS ‘VISION FOR CYCLING IN LONDON’ Mayor Boris Johnson says:“We will act more vigourously against cyclist violations, such as riding on the pavement” (page 23)“The Metropolitan and City of London Police have a vital job in safety, security and enforcement against antisocial cyclist behaviour” (page 28)“We recognise the real problem of antisocial cycling” (page 31)“We will increase enforcement action against illegal cyclist behaviour” (page 31)THE CYCLIST LOBBY ZEROS IN ON THIS STATEMENT IN THE ‘VISION’“One of the best ways of stopping people cycling on the pavement is to give them better places to cycle on the road” (page 33) – which is simply a repetition of the usual excuse made by cyclists for riding on the pavement ‘for their own safety’ and reflects the half-hearted way in which cycling policy is being implemented.GET BRITAIN CYCLING – by the All-party Parliamentary Cycling Group says:“ We need to train cyclists and drivers alike to travel legally and safely.”http://allpartycycling.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/get-britain-cycling1.pdf  A GRIMBY MAGISTRATE SAID: to a 29-year-old Grimsby man he fined £750 ‘cycling without consideration’ after hitting and injuring a five-year-old child while riding on the pavement, who claimed he was only cycling on the pavement because of the dangers of cycling on the road: "By not cycling on the road you put your own safety ahead of others, and the consequences of this could have been much worse. People have been killed by cyclists in similar incidents.“THE AUTHOR Is a life-time cyclist, motorcyclist, motorist and walker whose main hobby is flying extensively in the UK and Europe as a private pilot. In the 1970s and 80s I cycled daily to work from Ealing to Tottenham Court Road. At the age of 78 I find no need to use a bike (which I still have), preferring to walk and use public transport for local journeys. Pedestrian safety - my own - is now my major concern. I hope to achieve it by the time I reach the ‘walking stick’ stage. Two years ago I took the one day ‘Bikeability’ course on safe ‘on road’ cycling to see what it was like – it was good and I recommend it to all my OAP friends, some of whom have taken my advice.

Tony Purton ● 4482d18 Comments ● 4401d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS - 2

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 2DON’T JUST REPLY TO THIS POST – WRITE TO THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESThe four recent postings on pavement cycling seem to have attracted the usual hate-mail from cyclists claiming that everybody else is worse than they are so why pick on them. Some 17 individuals have registered 118 posts so far. 5 of the posters seem to be against pavement cycling. The rest make the usual excuses for it and (t)witter on about irrelevant issues. What I hope to do is encourage PEDESTRIANS to have their say by writing to the responsible authorities (listed below), as I have done, to press those authorities to enforce the long-standing law against pavement cycling. All the authorities agree that pavement cycling is illegal (see below) but do little to enforce the law. Cleveland Ward councillor John Popham has recently admitted to one correspondent (not me) that “cycling on the pavement….. is definitely getting worse.”In Bristol a campaign group has made a stand against pavement cycling following evidence videoed by pensioners – see http://road.cc/content/news/67162-pensioners-who-videoed-pavement-cyclists-bristol-are-now-campaigning-more-cycle. David Willingham, who represents Bishopston has asked new police commissioner Sue Mountstevens to crack down on the 'anti-social' antics of riders.If the government is encouraging people to walk more, they will do so on the pavements. If the government realises its stated aim to increase cycle use in the UK to 5 times its present volume over the next 12 years (from 2% of journeys in 2011 to 10% of all journeys in 2025) then the danger/nuisance of pavement cycling we experience today will soon increase beyond any tolerable bounds on more crowded pavements.Safety for cyclists on the roads is a matter for all road users (including cyclists) to resolve between them. The pavements are not a refuge for any of them. A default 20mph urban speed limit would reduce the speed differential between motor vehicles and cyclists. If cyclists want to be separated from motor vehicles they should lobby for exclusive cycle lanes. For Phillipa Bond - Re SIGNS: a clearly intelligible NO PAVEMENT CYCLING sign is simple and cheap to produce and display. Take the ubiquitous NO SMOKING sign, a red circle with a backward red slash across it, and put a bicycle in the middle in place of the smoking cigarette – and there you have it. Embossed with the Met Police and Ealing Council logos and bearing reference to Section 72 of the 1835 Highways Act and Rule 64 of the Highway Code, such signs could be printed on self-adhesive A4 labels (6 or 8 to a page) and stuck on lamp-posts throughout the Borough. I have submitted such a design to both the Met Police and Ealing Council. The reaction of Ealing Council’s cycling guru Nick O’Donnell was: “we do not believe that the erection of what would have to be a mass of signs across the Borough on this matter is really (a) good spend of taxpayers money (b) in line with our policies on reducing street clutter and (c) likely to actively deter this activity to justify the spend”. Ealing Council has bid for £38.5 million of London Mayor Boris’s £100 million fund to improve facilities for cyclists. A few £ thousands spent on self-adhesive labels to protect pedestrians would hardly be missed, but the NO CYCLING signs would encourage pedestrians to exert their right in law to cycle-free pavements.Here are some of the official statements I have collected from the highest levels of the “responsible authorities” in the course of pursuing this issue. PARLIAMENTThere appears to be a lack of understanding amongst the public and some police about the legal requirements for cyclists, including, for example, whether it is illegal to cycle on a pavement. The Department confirmed that it was illegal and undertook to consult its police liaison officer about how it might draw this to the attention of police forces across the country.Enforcing cycling offences was typically not high on the agenda of most police forces due to competing demands on their time. Public Accounts Committee: Report on Cycling, October 2009MINISTERS“..cycling on the pavement ….. is an offence. Enforcement is a matter for the police.” Mike Penning, Transport Minister: letter Ref.MC/344 59 22 March 2012“Rule 64 of the Highway Code clearly states that you MUST NOT cycle on the pavement. The Code is essential reading for road users” Norman Baker, Transport Minister: Written PQ answer 353 DfT Ref.39439 10/12 17 April 2012“The way the police enforce the law ….. are matters for their professional judgement and discretion” Nick Herbert, Home Office Minister: Written PQ answer [103300] 19 April 2012METROPOLITAN POLICE“The impact and hazards caused by cycling on the pavement is [also] punishable by way of fixed penalty notice and we issued over 6,150 tickets for this offence last year.” Commander Adrian Hanstock Met Police: letter 14 May 2012“… there are no specific advisory campaigns advising the general public about cycling on the pavement”  Commander Adrian Hanstock Met Police: e-mail 20 May 2012 Police National Legal Database and DfT Police Liaison Newsletter September 2009Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 provides an offence of riding or driving on the footpath. It states: 72. If any person shall wilfully ride upon any footpath or causeway by the side of any road, made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengers; or shall wilfully lead or drive any horse, ass, sheep, mule, swine, cattle or carriage of any description, or any truck or sledge, upon any such footpath or causeway or tether any horse, ass, mule, swine or cattle on any highway so as to suffer or permit the tethered animal to be thereon.Offence Wording: On **(..SPECIFY DATE..) at **(..SPECIFY TOWNSHIP..) wilfully rode a pedal cycle upon a footpath or causeway by the side of a road, namely **(..SPECIFY ROAD AND LOCATION..), made or set apart for the use or accommodation of foot passengersNOTES:(i) A footpath is part of a highway, if it is beside a road.(ii) The section only extends to the wilful obstructions specified.(iii) Proceeding may be instituted by anyone and is not confined exclusively to the Highway Authority.(iv) "Wilful" under this section means "purposely“The legislation makes no exceptions for small wheeled or children’s cycles. However, if any rider is under the age of criminal responsibility (10) they will not be guilty of the offence.Section 72 applies to the driving of  'a carriage of any description', which includes bicycles, tricycles , motor vehicles and trailers, as well as to certain animals.Local bye-laws may apply in relation to cycling in pedestrian precincts.EALING COUNCIL“I agree that adults cycling on pavements is not appropriate and illegal and as has been repeatedly explained to you something we are working on discouraging”. Nick O’Donnell Assistant Director Strategic Transport, London Borough of Ealing“cycling on the pavement….. is definitely getting worse.” CLEVELAND WARD COUNCILLOR John Popham HOW MUCH DOES A MOVING CYCLIST WEIGH?Any moving body has an energy potential far greater that it’s standing weight – known as Kinetic Energy. It is measured by the formula ½MV² where M=weight and V=speed.It is well understood that a 1 ton vehicle (a typical saloon car) traveling at 30mph has a Kinetic Energy potential of 450 tons, which is why it is almost certain to kill any pedestrian it hits at that speed. A cyclist traveling at 10mph will ‘weigh’ 50 times his own weight. At 15mph he will ‘weigh’ 112 times his own weight. That energy potential in collision with a pedestrian can do a great deal of damage, not to mention the ‘trauma’ of such a collision especially for the vulnerable elderly or infirm. A rugby full back blocking an attacking forward in full flight probably experiences the sort of collision that an unsuspecting pedestrian might suffer from a collision with a 10mph cyclist. PROTECTIVE CLOTHINGCyclists tend to wear helmets and some protective clothing in case they fall off their bikes.  Pedestrians do not dress to protect themselves from collision with cyclists or any other vehicles. They rely simply on avoiding them. THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIESEaling’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293 London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk], responsible for implementing London Mayor Boris Johnson’s ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Ward Councillors:Councillor Isobel Grant     Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk                              Councillor John Popham   John.popham@ealing.gov.uk                             Councillor Greg Stafford   Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukEaling Conservative Action TeamRosa Popham      rpopham@btinternet.com                              Ian Proud        ianproud@ip-associates.demon.co.uk                                                                

Tony Purton ● 4482d8 Comments ● 4405d

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS

PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANSThe ‘cycling lobby’ (including the CTC) insists on sharing the public pavements, uninvited, on the grounds that cyclists are no threat to pedestrians, that most pedestrians don’t mind, and it is safer for cyclists than riding on the roadways. The government’s Bikeability scheme promotes safer cycling on the roadways, acknowledging (but only in whispers) that pavement cycling is illegal. There are moves afoot to create a default 20mph speed limit in all urban areas which would reduce the speed differential between motor vehicles and cyclists thereby making the roads safer for all road users and easier for pedestrians to cross the roads. See http://www.20splentyforus.org.uk/its_time_for_20.htmTfL is said to be developing a ‘Pedestrian Safety Action Plan’. The Living Streets organisation http://www.livingstreets.co.uk   is involved in those discussions – contact Tom.Platt@living streets.co.uk . Hopefully the Plan will tackle the issue of pavement cycling.What does the ‘pedestrian lobby’ think? Why not tell the responsible authorities listed in the following letter, and raise the issue at the next Cleveland Ward meeting on Thursday 24October.WHO SHOULD STOP PAVEMENT CYCLING?(Unsigned letter to Ealing Gazette 23 August 2013)Reply to the editor Ealing Gazette on 23 August – not publishedThe simple answer is the Metropolitan Police. Pavement cycling is a crime under the 1835 Highways Act, as indicated in Rule 64 of the Highway Code. Pavement cycling incidents should be reported (preferably with photographic evidence) to Sgt James Ayling of Ealing’s Community Police Team [mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406] with copies to Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command [mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293]. Unfortunately the Metropolitan Police appear to regard pavement cycling as a ‘petty crime’ which they are content to ignore as a matter of policy in favour of chasing ‘real criminals’. Ealing’s own police officers are badly (or ‘defensively’) briefed on the issue as your correspondent has discovered.At Ealing Council the promotion of cycling in the borough is the responsibility of Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell [mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078]. There is an office dealing with cycling issues [mailto: cycling@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 5771]. However, Ealing Council refuses to make its social contribution to controlling pavement cycling by putting up signs indicating that it is illegal, or even mentioning the illegality of pavement cycling in any of its cycling-promotion literature. Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is Ealing’s Cabinet Member for Transport and Environment [mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656]London Mayor Boris Johnson’s recently appointed London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk] is responsible for implementing his ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ [http://www.london.gov.uk/sites/default/files/Cycling%20Vision%20GLA%20template%20FINAL.pdf] which includes enforcing the law against pavement cycling [pages 23, 28 and 31]. Ealing and Hillingdon member of the London Assembly Dr Onkar Sahota [mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558] may be expected to pursue the issue in the London Assembly. Perhaps the best way to tackle the issue would be by clear signing and public pressure. It is only 6 years since the civil anti-smoking laws, enforced by Environmental Health Officers, came into force. No-smoking signs abound in public places and the law is generally observed because of public resistance to smoking. Simple self-explanatory signs against pavement cycling could have a similar effect in helping to enforce the 1835 Highways Act under which it is a criminal offence for anyone to ride (or even ‘scoot’) a bicycle on the public footpath. Public resistance to pavement cycling would do the rest.Perhaps significantly, there is no official ‘no-pavement-cycling’ sign in the Department of Transport’s library of road signs. However, a simple sign adapted from DfT’s Road Signs Manual Chapter 3 diagram 5.26 (page 37) would do the trick for Ealing:[https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223943/traffic-signs-manual-chapter-03.pdf]This letter is copied to the Police Officers and Officials mentioned in the text plus local MPs Angie Bray and Steve Pound.Tony Purton Ealing W13 NOTE: In an e-mail exchange reacting to this letter, Ealing’s Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell made  the following statements:1. Ealing Council runs a nationally acclaimed cycle training course where lawful and proper cycling habits are taught 2. we work on a regular basis with our cycle trainers, the local cycling campaign and the local police to seek to discourage pavement cycling.3. We also work with the local police to try and pick up on known “hotspots” where this activity occurs 4. “we do not believe that the erection of what would have to be a mass of signs across the Borough on this matter is really (a) good spend of taxpayers money (b) in line with our policies on reducing street clutter and (c) likely to actively deter this activity to justify the spend.  5. “Our bikeability training was awarded a national award last year and is rated as one of the best in the country”6. “we are well aware of the issues of pavement cycling in the Pitshanger area”7. “I agree that adults cycling on pavements is not appropriate and illegal and as has been repeatedly explained to you something we are working on discouraging”. QUESTION: Have you seen any signs of Ealing Council or Ealing Police acting to ‘discourage’ pavement cycling?

Tony Purton ● 4486d37 Comments ● 4405d

The big Labour lie machine comes to Ealing

The Labour party paid for someone to push this through my door today whilst we were in the park, Walpole Park as it happens.  Let’s take apart Labour's spin and lies.  Let’s start with the “Investing” box.  The council spends almost nothing on cycling.  It merely rebrands the London Mayor’s spending on cycling as its own.  The cycle hub was paid for by Transport for London, not the council.  It would certainly have happened if the Tories were in power.  Not quite sure what they mean by “a new transport interchange at the station”.  There is a modernisation of the railway bit of the station going to happen with Crossrail and a new frontage.  Hardly a new transport interchange and all paid for out of the Crossrail project.  Nothing to do with the council.  The council might have insisted on escalators, an exit to the east of the station and a more sympathetic frontage but all three of these have slipped through it grasp.  When the Tories were in power we kept a close eye on Crossrail with a scrutiny panel.  I would hope we would have got a better deal for Ealing out of Crossrail than this council has.  The Walpole Park line particularly rankles with me as I kicked the project off in 2008.  The early stages of these things take a while.  It was a Conservative administration that allocated the council’s share of the money for this and I personally met the Heritage Lottery Fund to argue the case for this project, more here.  It is great that the Labour council has continued this project (it was so far advanced it would have been hard to stop frankly) but to try to claim it as a uniquely Labour achievement is simply unjust.  Much of what happens in local government is uncontroversial.  Good ideas prosper hopefully but take a while to work through the system.  More than 4 years often.  This kind of dividing lines nonsense is just another big Labour lie.  The current Labour administration has had little flexibility in capital spending, like ours before, due to the demands of school expansion.  Where it has had latitude it has spent £2.5 million on an empty car park in Southall and £10 million on new offices for council staff.  The car park really was their idea and one we consistently fought.  The officers tried to interest us in building them new offices, we said no.  Funny how these two don’t appear in the leaflets.  Looking at the right hand box, the local Tories also wholeheartedly approve of the Labour group freezing council tax for four years (like just about every other council in the country).  It might be nice if Labour acknowledged the £20 million of council tax freeze grant it has pocketed from the government to pay for it in large part (which is why most other councils also did the same thing).   We might have gone further but I am certain that we would not have put up the council tax at all at the very least.  The “Tories attack Ealing families” logo simply shows you just who is the nasty, name calling party in this borough at least.  No-one is “attacking Ealing families” unless you call leaving Ealing’s roads unmended and dirty an attack on families.  I wouldn’t use that language.  I would say that the Labour party is lying to “Ealing families” on a massive scale though.

Phil Taylor ● 4411d3 Comments ● 4411d

Cycling From Ealing

Can I ask whether anyone knows of any small cycling groups in the Ealing area? I took up recreational cycling about four years ago, it becoming quite a passion. My primary interest is mountain biking, although I’ve also done a reasonable amount of road cycling too, particularly in the winter (wet, muddy) months. From slow unfit beginnings I was very pleased indeed with my progression, cycling becoming more and more enjoyable the fitter I got, also resulting in people not having to wait for me so often – indeed there would be times I’d have to wait for others, which was quite a nice feeling!That was until a few medical issues in the second half of this year, resulting in me not cycling anywhere near as much and getting progressively less fit. It’s a bit of a vicious circle as being a lot slower I’m not enjoying it as much and so trend not to go out so much, exacerbating the problem. It would provide a lot more incentive if I could find a few other local riders of a similar level of fitness – i.e. brisk but not racers, whom I could perhaps tag on with regularly. I’m thinking of road riding but don’t currently have a road bike, using a mountain bike - but it’s a good, light one with dry off road tyres so isn’t bad on road. Prior to my medical and resultant fitness issues I could cruise at 17/18 mph on level road, hitting 20 at a push. However now I’m about 2 to 3 mph down on those values.Does anyone here do ‘training’ rides or know of anyone I might be able to approach?  

Chris Bennett ● 4416d4 Comments ● 4416d

Dr Onkar Sahota's application in Haven Green rejected

Neighbours are celebrating after a building application for a 128 year old house in Ealing's Haven Green Conservation area was thrown out at committee last night (Wednesday 13th March)The substantial property on Castlebar Road - bordering Longfield Walk was bought in 2011 for £1.4million by Ealing and Hillingdon GLA representative Dr Onkar Sahota.He wanted to add a basement, extend the house both sideways and to the rear and add a glass roof.Over a hundred people objected to the plans, claiming the proposals were highly detrimental to the area.Last night - despite the application being recommended for approval by Ealing Council planners - a committee of Councillors rejected it.10 voted against the proposed development, none for and there were three abstentions. Councillors were particularly unhappy with the glass roof extension which they described as looking like a glass 'roof box'.Liberal Democrat Councillor, Nigel Bakhai, voted against the application. He said: '' The plans were out of character with the Haven Green Conservation Area and I could not support officer's recommendation to approve.'' Victor Mishiku, who has been heading the local campaign says he used his 27 years' experience of planning issues to help local residents.He is appalled by the whole procedure, claiming planners 'ruthlessly' tried to push through this application and adds: '' Is Ealing Council Planning Department "fit for purpose"?  The 43 Castlebar Road case attracted comments from the Committee that the report was poorly written, absurd, in defiance of reality, insulting (to the intelligence) and part of the proposal was described as "disgraceful" and resulting in the glass box roof extension making the top roof part of the development being "lit up like a Xmas Tree''.Next door neighbour Judy Jaafar says: '' I and others will be writing formal letters of complaint to the LBE chief executive about how badly this whole application was handled by the Planning Department, about procedural irregularities and about how the planners were quite happy to break almost all their own planning guidelines in an effort to push this through. Fortunately the councillors saw through all the nonsense, "lies" in the words of one councillor, and we saw informed local democracy in action.'' xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxI am sure you have all read this but what I find interesting is Doctor's sure do earn a lot of money maybe that's why the NHS is in crisis.Secondly, Isn't it strange that Planning control were happy with his plans. I hope it wasn't an inside job or that innapropriate payment was made to any officer. I hope they conduct a full investigation into this state of affairs because something smells fishy. Where there is money, there is corruption.

Anna Lang ● 4707d194 Comments ● 4427d

MAYOR MUST ACT TO PROTECT PEDESTRIANS

Published in 'Your Letters' Ealing Gazette Friday 13 December 2013For safety’s sake stay off pavementsIn response to London Assembly member Jenny Green’s call for Boris Johnson to act to protect cyclists on London’s roads [“Mayor must act to protect cyclists” letters Friday 6 December], will she also call on him to stop cyclists taking to the pedestrian pavements ‘for their own safety’. NO CYCLING signs on lamp posts would be a cheap and effective way to start (see below).However cyclists are viewed by other road users they are in law an anti-social and criminal menace when they ride on the pedestrian pavements. Under Section 72 of the Highways Act 1835 pedal cycles are defined as carriages, to be ridden only on the carriageways. Rule 64 of the Highway Code defines pavement cycling as a NO-NO!Following the recent deaths of cyclists in London the Metropolitan Police appear to be monitoring more closely the behaviour of cyclists on the roads, and the behaviour of other road users towards cyclists. They should at the same time crack down on any cyclists riding on the pavement, which is a criminal offence in itself no matter how the rider behaves while doing so.Certainly a default 20mph speed limit on the capital’s streets would make a significant contribution to cycling safety by reducing the speed differential between cyclists and other road traffic.Tony Purton Ealing Copied to: 'James.Ayling@met.police.uk'; Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk'; ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk; bassam.mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk; 'andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk'; 'onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk'; 'steve.pound.mp@parliament.uk'; 'angie.bray.mp@parliament.uk'Personal reply from Jenny Bond: "In response to your comments about cycling on pavements, it makes me very angry when cyclists break the law because it is dangerous, disrespectful to pedestrians and gives a bad name to those cyclists who don’t break the rules." See also previous postings: Page 6: PAVEMENT CYCLING; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS; PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 2. Page 5: PAVEMENTS ARE FOR PEDESTRIANS – 3THE RESPONSIBLE AUTHORITIES TO CONTACT ARE:Ealing’s Community Police Team mailto: James.Ayling@met.police.uk Tel: 020 8246 9406 Met Police HQ: Commander Adrian Hanstock head of the Met Police Safer Transport Command mailto: Adrian.Hanstock@met.police.uk Tel: 020 3054 0293 London Cycling Commissioner Andrew Gilligan [mailto: andrew.gilligan@london.gov.uk],  responsible for implementing London Mayor Boris Johnson’s ‘Vision for Cycling in London’ London Assembly: Ealing and Hillingdon member Dr Onkar Sahota mailto: onkar.sahota@london.gov.uk Tel: 020 7983 6558 Ealing Council: Assistant Director of Strategic Transport Nick O’Donnell mailto: ODonnellN@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 020 8825 8078 Ealing Council Cabinet: Member for Transport and Environment Councillor Bassam Mahfouz is mailto: Mahfouz@ealing.gov.uk Tel: 07949 104 656Ealing Ward Councillors:Councillor Isobel Grant     Isobel.grant@ealing.gov.uk                              Councillor John Popham   John.popham@ealing.gov.uk                             Councillor Greg Stafford   Gregory.stafford@ealing.gov.ukEaling Conservative Action TeamRosa Popham      rpopham@btinternet.com                              Ian Proud             ianproud@ip-associates.demon.co.uk

Tony Purton ● 4434d5 Comments ● 4427d

Widespread local opposition to the Lionel Road Scheme

Ealing residents may be aware that the London Borough of Hounslow last week approved a planning application by Lionel Road Developments Limited to build 910 high rise apartments, a 160 bedroom hotel and a 20,000 seat football stadium just over the South Ealing- Brentford border in a a triangular site bounded by Lionel Road, three railway lines and the West end of Chiswick High Road. This scheme is contrary to borough, GLA and national planning guidelines and policy, particularly as it contains no social or affordable housing and involves building tower blocks up to 17 storeys high within 5 metres of each other adjacent to the A4, the M4, Chiswick Road, the North Circular Road and Kew Bridge in an area where traffic congestion is already a major problem.The Council approved this aplication despite the serious objections made by over 1,000 residents of Chiswick W4, Brentford TW8, Richmond TW9 and others and despite the objections of local non-party political residents groups who represent many thousands of local people who live close to the proposed scheme. Members of these groups will have found it unnecessary to submit objections individually as they quite understandably felt they were represented by their local residents' group, society or association.The objectors included: 1. Brentford Community Council2. Chiswick High Road Action Group3. Strand on the Green Association4. Friends of Stile Hall Gardens5. The Kew Society6. The Kew Residents Association7. The Kew Bridge Owner's Association8. The Isleworth Society9. The West Chiswick and Gunnersbury Society10. The Thornton-Mayfield Residents Association11. The Temaire Place Residents Management Company 12. The Green Dragon Lane Housing Cooperative13. The Grove Park Group (whose objections were mysteriously omitted from the Officers' Report).14. The Isleworth SocietyImportant national and local organisations that objected included:15. The London Borough of Richmond on Thames16. English Heritage (whose objections will be a matter for consideration by the Secretary of State in accordance with Circular 02/09)17. The Georgian Group18. The Victorian Society19. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew20. Kew Bridge Engines Trust (The Steam Museum)21. The London Parks and Gardens TrustThe Greater London Authority commented critically on the Report but did not lodge an objection at this stage perhapsd because the planning application will now be referred to the Mayor in accordance with the Mayor of London Order 2008. The London Borough of Ealing made no objection even though Ealing residents nearby will be badly affected by the scheme - both during construction and afterwards.The application was supported by Stephen Pound, the MP for Ealing North (which is of course a safe distance away from Lionel Road,  Chiswick and Brentford).

David Giles ● 4436d13 Comments ● 4428d