Forum Topic

That makes a lot of sense but I think it is more important to think what life would be like without a local newspaper rather than hark back to when they used to be better.The big challenge that faces this part of West London over the next decade is the amount of development that will take place in the area. There is a risk that this will be unfettered due to the close relationship between the developers and Ealing Council and the archaic manner in which the public is supposed to kept officially informed about such matters. The notice of the planning application for a 32 storey building in Park Royal last month was hidden among a  long list of loft conversions and extensions in Ealing Council's notices in the Gazette. It is wrong however to suggest that the Gazette does no coverage of these matters. They do seem to think the skyscrapers going up in Park Royal are not newsworthy and have so far failed to report on a massive development planned in the Friary Park area of Acton (which to be fair ActonW3.com have yet to mention) but they did a very good job of reporting on the controversy of the Oaks development.A local paper that reports only on very major planning issues is not the ideal but it is better than the alternative of none at all. I fear for the Gazette's future because it may enjoy some degree of protection in the run up to the election but after that the next Government may be looking closely at the cost to the taxpayer of keeping it, and other papers like it, operating.

Andy Jones ● 3992d

You are entitled to your opinion on the quality of the content. I happen to think you underestimate it. They way you view news is now becoming the exception rather than the rule and you have a major misconception about the nature of GetwestLondon's operation. Trinity have spent a lot of money tailoring the site to the way people consume news at the moment. Very few people will navigate to a news web site on the off chance of finding something interesting - more and more they are being pulled in through social media. Publishers have less control over the prominence of their stories as this is largely determined by how many people share their content. A highly localised story, however interesting to the people immediately affected, isn't going to get many shares and therefore won't have a particularly high profile in social media.This site's primary method for distributing stories is through e-mail which was very effective in the past but is becoming less so as younger generations move away from this medium. They are very disinclined to subscribe to e-newsletter preferring to consume their news organically based on what people they know are interested in.Trinity have spent millions ensuring that the content they generate is presented in a form that is easy to share. This site does not do this so well and is at a competitive disadvantage.We probably will end up with a kind of news predominating that the older generation finds less to their taste. It will be shorter in length with less analysis and more tailored to younger people. The Ealing Gazette is totally dependent on the revenue it gets from the Council and if that disappears due to regulatory changes it would probably close. Longer term Getwestlondon might be your best and only source of local news.

Stuart Howard ● 4002d

I've got some old copies from the 1980s and 90s and what a superb paper the Ealing Gazette was.I think it is one of the worst aspects of the internet age that local newspapers and indeed national newspapers have gone into what looks like terminal decline.7 Local titles out of the Ealing Gazettes group folded just before Christmas. Including the Harrow and Wembley Observers which were the groups strongest titles at one time.Whilst forums like this are great in many ways, the internet does not have trained reporters who go out and knock on doors, seek out proper stories and  properly cover council meetings and the antics of those who do society no favours. Good reporters ask questions, sometimes very difficult questions, seek answers. Good reporters and writers cross check and double check and in particular, good local papers would publish solid reliable and true reports and stories.It was also clearly where high quality training for young journalists and photographers took place and regular or avid readers like myself could notice how much better material became from some of the regular names in the paper.Middlesex County Press as it was for a very long time, was independent and resistant to external influence, even some of the freesheets in the 80s seemed to manage that.Sadly we are reduced to local papers that are dependent on advertising and this new form that dictates the tone of the paper. The use of fake front pages and very poor and biased reporting inside by the pro Heathrow campaign is as low as Pravda in  CCCCP days.  Wholly undermining press freedom of which so much is shouted about over niche corners like "Charlie Hebdo"Real press freedom begins with local papers, whether it's exposing council wrongdoing, warped streetlamps, dubvious developers, dodgy doctors or dog poo on pavements. Getting into the the fabric of local life and getting answers from the culprits. Not press release 'statements'.I believe the lack of good strong local papers is why we are getting walked all over by so many things these days which simply would not go under the radar  unchecked with quite the ease.I really hope the Gazette survives and that it's owners find it's teeth again.

Anthony Waller ● 4013d