GLA report states benefits of scheme outweigh 'less than substantial' harm
A visualisation of the Perceval House redevelopment with Sadiq Khan. Picture: Red Block Rebels
Campaigners hoping the Mayor of London would block Ealing Council’s application to redevelop the Perceval House site have been disappointed.
Sadiq Khan delegated the decision to Deputy Mayor Jules Pipe who wrote to Ealing Council on 24 May informing it that the Greater London Authority (GLA) had no objections to the proposal which includes a 26 storey tower as well as 447 flats.
Those opposed to the scheme had been hopeful that the Mayor would refuse the scheme or call it in meaning a public hearing would have been held on
The GLA officer’s report said the proposed used for this ‘well-connected site within a Metropolitan town centre’ are ‘strongly supported’. The impact on local heritage assets was described as ‘less than substantial harm’.
While the height of the buildings was ‘not strictly in full accordance’ with London Plan policies it was this was outweighed by the public benefits of the scheme. The height was described as ‘broadly in line with planning policy in this highly accessible town centre location’ and the visual and environmental impacts were deemed to be acceptable.
An additional 557 objections to the scheme were sent directly to the Mayor on top of more than two thousand which were made at the time of the original application.
The application will now be subject to the approval of the Secretary of State.
Like Reading Articles Like This? Help Us Produce More
This site remains committed to providing local community news and public interest journalism.
Articles such as the one above are integral to what we do. We aim to feature as much as possible on local societies, charities based in the area, fundraising efforts by residents, community-based initiatives and even helping people find missing pets.
We've always done that and won't be changing, in fact we'd like to do more.
However, the readership that these stories generates is often below that needed to cover the cost of producing them. Our financial resources are limited and the local media environment is intensely competitive so there is a constraint on what we can do.
We are therefore asking our readers to consider offering financial support to these efforts. Any money given will help support community and public interest news and the expansion of our coverage in this area.
A suggested monthly payment is £8 but we would be grateful for any amount for instance if you think this site offers the equivalent value of a subscription to a daily printed newspaper you may wish to consider £20 per month. If neither of these amounts is suitable for you then contact email@example.com and we can set up an alternative. All payments are made through a secure web site.
One-off donations are also appreciated. Choose The Amount You Wish To Contribute.
If you do support us in this way we'd be interested to hear what kind of articles you would like to see more of on the site – send your suggestions to the editor.
For businesses we offer the chance to be a corporate sponsor of community content on the site. For £30 plus VAT per month you will be the designated sponsor of at least two articles a month with your logo appearing if supplied. If there is a specific community group or initiative you'd like to support we can make sure your sponsorship is featured on related content for a one off payment of £50 plus VAT. All payments are made through a secure web site.
May 28, 2021