Watermans Park Development and the 235 bus
In fact the Area Forum was fairly uncontroversial (as they  go) with the main item of contention being works on the Duke of Northumberland  River where some of the locals are concerned (amongst other things) that the  changes will increase the risk of flooding.
          
I spent a lot of Friday in Brentford County Court where  there was a Case Management Conference (CMC) on the Watermans Park moorings  saga. Having managed to stay a step or two ahead of the law for most of my life  I had never heard of a CMC in these circumstances but it was all about how the  trial will be conducted, about what evidence will be admitted, document  disclosure etc. Barristers for the council and the majority of the boaters,  plus three boaters who are representing themselves, fought it out with the judge  on a lot of technical legal questions and as I suppose is pretty standard, we  won some and lost some. It brought home to me how long this is going to take.
A relief in the evening to be out knocking on doors in  Lateward and Clifden etc on the old referendum trail. I didn’t have time to go  home and change so I was still in my suit like somebody who takes himself  seriously: this is not recommended for canvassing, especially when it’s a warm  evening, but our reception was very good again and the evening was capped off  with a drink or two in the well-hidden garden of the Watermans Arms.
Then it was the Bank Holiday Weekend. I spent some time down  at Crystal Palace indulging the old car thing. Back when I was a boy they used  to have a car racing circuit in the park there and my boyhood heroes would  appear but it was stopped many years ago because of noise and safety concerns. I  hadn’t realised they run a Bank Holiday sprint meeting so it was good to go for  the first time and stir up a few ghosts from the 1960s.
Tuesday back to business and I spent the afternoon on the  Watermans Park proposals again, attending a meeting with various interested  parties about legal and practical plans. I begin to understand why previous  attempts to resolve the unauthorised moorings have not come to fruition because  it is all extremely complicated but there is a real determination to get it  resolved this time.
In the evening a licensing panel. We expected a very  contentious application but this was withdrawn at the last minute and we had  only one application, for an extension of hours of an existing café/restaurant  in Chiswick. We had a no-show and only two on the panel where there are  normally three and muggins had to take the chair.
No meetings on Wednesday other than our campaign committee  for Remain in the EU in the evening, where we set out our plans up to and  including June 23rd. 
Two major issues have been bubbling in the background this  week and taking up quite a lot of time and emotion. The first is the very  unique (whatever the editor says) Sarah Trimmer Hall, where it seemed that the  instructions given to the developer by planning had not been followed. A lot of  activity by residents (and councillors!) sniffing round what was going on,  taking photos, informing planners etc, which culminated in another planning  visit on Tuesday and some fairly direct communications. We wait to see what  happens next but there is direct engagement in this issue by Council Leader  Steve Curran as well as top council officers.
The other (yes, you guessed it) is our old, and frequently  lost, friend the 235. After TfL had fulfilled a request from Barratts to (I kid  you not) wash the road – something I personally witnessed with a man with an  industrial sized bottle of Fairy Liquid and a lot of bubbles, mummy, in the  middle of GWQ – the service resumed, and everything in the garden was rosy.  This morning the regular as clockwork 7.48 am email – it’s stopped AGAIN. I was  wondering whether this was because of a previously unnoticed understain on the  road (perhaps they should have used new, biological Ariel) or the ruddy  bollard, or some newly-invented reason, when the man from TfL wrote back to me  saying NO IT HASN’T STOPPED. Shortly afterwards one of my spies confirms this:  it seems that the morning spotter had been fooled by seeing a flock of 235s  roosting, like starlings, at the stand behind Morrisons saying Brentford County  Court on the front. Oops. Well, to be fair we are all working to the  expectation that it will not last long. During the course of the morning we  hatched a plan to have a public meeting to get together a petition about the  235: it will be held on 12th June at 5.30 in the Clayponds Community  Centre, Clayponds Gardens and so far confirmed attendees are Steve Curran, Mel  Collins and myself plus Julie Brooker who runs the community centre and some  other very concerned residents. All welcome! Admission Free!
Guy Lambert
June 6, 2016
| 
 |